Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change, and Amendment No. 1 Thereto, by the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to the Price Improvement Period Under the Rules of the Boston Options Exchange Facility, 15955-15959 [E5-1383]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 29, 2005 / Notices
the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
that the petition, request and/or the
contentions should be granted based on
a balancing of the factors specified in 10
CFR 2.309(a)(1)(I)–(viii).
Duke Energy Corporation, et al., Docket
No. 50–414, Catawba Nuclear Station
Unit 2, York County, South Carolina
Date of amendment request: February
5, 2005, as supplemented by letter dated
February 7, 2005.
Description of amendment request:
The amendment revises the system
bypass leakage acceptance criterion for
the charcoal adsorber in the 2B
Auxiliary Building Filtered Ventilation
Exhaust System train as listed in
Technical Specification 5.5.11,
‘‘Ventilation Filter Testing Program.’’
Date of issuance: February 7, 2005.
Effective date: As of the date of
issuance and shall be implemented
within 30 days from the date of
issuance.
Amendment No.: 213.
Renewed Facility Operating License
No. NPF–52: Amendments revised the
Technical Specifications.
Public comments requested as to
proposed no significant hazards
consideration (NSHC):
No.
The Commission’s related evaluation
of the amendment, finding of emergency
circumstances, state consultation, and
final NSHC determination are contained
in a safety evaluation dated February 7,
2005.
Attorney for licensee: Ms. Anne
Cottingham, Esquire.
NRC Section Chief: John A. Nakoski.
The Commission’s related evaluation
of the amendment, finding of emergency
circumstances, state consultation, and
final NSHC determination are contained
in a safety evaluation dated February 7,
2005.
Attorney for licensee: Ms. Anne
Cottingham, Esquire.
NRC Section Chief: John A. Nakoski.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day
of March 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Ledyard B. Marsh,
Director, Division of Licensing Project
Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E5–1343 Filed 3–28–05; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application
of Hythiam, Inc. to Withdraw its
Common Stock, $.0001 par value, From
Listing and Registration on the
American Stock Exchange LLC File No.
1–31932
17:01 Mar 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
imposed by the Commission for the
protection of investors. All comment
letters may be submitted by either of the
following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include the
File Number 1–31932 or;
March 22, 2005.
Paper Comments
On March 7, 2005, Hythiam, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (‘‘Issuer’’), filed
an application with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
pursuant to section 12(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’)1 and Rule 12d2–2(d)
thereunder,2 to withdraw its common
stock, $.0001 par value (‘‘Security’’),
from listing and registration on the
American Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘Amex’’).
On March 4, 2005, the Board of
Directors (‘‘Board’’) of the Issuer
unanimously approved resolutions to
withdraw the Security from listing and
registration on Amex and to list the
Security on the Nasdaq National Market
(‘‘Nasdaq’’). The Board determined that
it is in the best interest of the Issuer and
its stockholders to withdraw the
Security from listing on the Amex and
to list the Security on Nasdaq. The
Board believed that listing the Security
on Nasdaq will enable the Issuer and its
stockholders to benefit from increased
visibility to investors, an open market
structure, and an efficient electronic
trading platform. In addition, the Board
stated that the Issuer has met the initial
listing requirements of Nasdaq, and the
application for listing the Security on
Nasdaq has been approved.
The Issuer stated that it has met the
requirements of Amex’s rules governing
an issuer’s voluntary withdrawal of a
security from listing and registration by
complying with all the applicable laws
in effect in Delaware, in which it is
incorporated.
The Issuer’s application relates solely
to the withdrawal of the Security from
listing on the Amex and from
registration under section 12(b) of the
Act,3 and shall not affect its obligation
to be registered under section 12(g) of
the Act.4
Any interested person may, on or
before April 15, 2005, comment on the
facts bearing upon whether the
application has been made in
accordance with the rules of the Amex,
and what terms, if any, should be
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
20549–0609.
All submissions should refer to File
Number 1–31932. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help us process and
review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on
the Commission’s Internet Web site
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/delist.shtml).
Comments are also available for public
inspection and copying in the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
All comments received will be posted
without change; we do not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly.
The Commission, based on the
information submitted to it, will issue
an order granting the application after
the date mentioned above, unless the
Commission determines to order a
hearing on the matter.
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
15955
PO 00000
1 15
U.S.C. 78l(d).
2 17 CFR 240.12d2–2(d).
3 15 U.S.C. 78l(b).
4 15 U.S.C. 78l(g).
Frm 00139
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.5
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–1377 Filed 3–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–51418; File No. SR–BSE–
2005–01]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice
of Filing of Proposed Rule Change,
and Amendment No. 1 Thereto, by the
Boston Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating
to the Price Improvement Period Under
the Rules of the Boston Options
Exchange Facility
March 23, 2005.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
5 17
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(1).
29MRN1
15956
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 29, 2005 / Notices
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January 4,
2005, the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘BSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in items I, II, and
III below, which items have been
prepared by the BSE. On March 22,
2005, the BSE filed Amendment No. 1
to the proposed rule change.3 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change, as amended, from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The BSE proposes to modify the rules
of the Boston Options Exchange Facility
(‘‘BOX’’) that relate to the Price
Improvement Period (the ‘‘PIP’’) to
eliminate certain restrictions on the
ability of Order Flow Providers, Market
Makers, and Public Customers (as
defined in sections 1(46), 1(32), and
1(50), respectively, of Chapter I of the
BOX Rules) to participate in the PIP.
Below is the amended text of the
proposed rule change. Proposed new
language is in italics; proposed
deletions are in [brackets].
*
*
*
*
*
Rules of the Boston Stock Exchange
Rules of the Boston Options Exchange
Facility
Trading of Options Contracts on BOX
Chapter V
Sec. 18 The Price Improvement Period
(‘‘PIP’’)
(a) through (d) No change.
(e) Options Participants, both OFPs
and Market Makers, executing agency
orders may designate BOX-Top and
marketable limit Customer Orders for
price improvement and submission to
the PIP. Customer Orders designated for
the PIP shall be submitted to BOX with
a matching contra order, the ‘‘Primary
Improvement Order’’, equal to the full
size of the Customer Order. The Primary
Improvement Order shall be on the
opposite side of the market than that of
the Customer Order and represent a
higher bid (lower offer) than that of the
National Best Bid Offer (NBBO) at the
time of the commencement of the PIP.
BOX will not permit a PIP to commence
unless at least three (3) Market Makers
were quoting in the relevant series at the
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Amendment No. 1 superseded and replaced the
original filing in its entirety.
2 17
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:01 Mar 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
time an Options Participant submits a
Primary Improvement Order to initiate a
PIP. BOX will commence a PIP by
broadcasting a message to Participants
that (1) states that a Primary
Improvement Order has been processed;
(2) contains information concerning
series, size, price and side of market,
and; (3) states when the PIP will
conclude (‘‘PIP Broadcast’’).
i. The PIP shall be 3 seconds,
commencing upon the dissemination of
the PIP Broadcast. [During the PIP,
Market Makers may submit competing
orders, ‘‘Improvement Orders’’, for only
those classes within their appointment.
Unless assigned as a Market Maker in
the appropriate class, Options
Participants may submit Improvement
Orders only in a PIP for which, (1) they
have submitted the Primary
Improvement Order; (2) they hold a
Customer PIP Order, (‘‘CPO’’), in
accordance with the requirements of
Paragraph (g) of this Section 18; or (3)
they meet the PIP Proprietary Order
(‘‘PPO’’) requirements of Paragraph (h)
of this Section 18.] During the PIP,
Order Flow Providers and Market
Makers (except for the Order Flow
Provider or Market Maker that submits
the relevant Primary Improvement
Order) may submit competing orders,
‘‘Improvement Orders,’’ for their own
account. Order Flow Providers may
submit Improvement Orders for the
account of a Public Customer under any
type of instruction they wish to accept.
Order Flow Providers may also provide
access to the PIP on behalf of a Public
Customer in the form of a CPO (as set
forth in subparagraph (g) below). An
Improvement Order submitted to the PIP
for the account of a Public Customer,
including a CPO, must be identified as
a Public Customer Order. [Market
Makers and ]Options Participants
[meeting the foregoing criteria] who
submit Improvement Orders for a PIP,
including CPOs, shall be deemed ‘‘PIP
Participants’’ for that specific PIP only,
and may continually submit competing
Improvement Orders during that PIP.
During the PIP, Improvement Orders
shall be disseminated solely to Options
Participants.
ii. The Options Participant who
submitted the Primary Improvement
Order is not permitted to cancel or to
modify the size of its Primary
Improvement Order or the Customer
Order at any time during the PIP, and
may modify only the price of its Primary
Improvement Order by improving it.
The subsequent price modifications to a
Primary Improvement Order are treated
as new Improvement Orders for the sake
of establishing priority in the PIP
process. Options Participants that are
PO 00000
Frm 00140
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
permitted to submit Improvement
Orders (as set forth in subparagraph i.
above)[Market Makers, except for a
Market Maker that submits the relevant
Primary Improvement Order,] may: (1)
Submit competing Improvement
Order(s) for any size up to the size of the
Customer Order; (2) submit competing
Improvement Order(s) for any price
equal to or better than the Primary
Improvement Order; (3) improve the
price of their Improvement Order(s) at
any point during the PIP; and (4)
decrease the size of their Improvement
Order(s) only by improving the price of
that order. Improvement Orders may be
submitted in one-cent increments.
iii. At the conclusion of the PIP, the
Customer Order shall be matched
against the best prevailing order(s) on
BOX, in accordance with price/time
priority as set forth in Section 16 of this
Chapter V, whether Improvement
Order(s), including CPO(s) [and PPO(s)],
or unrelated order(s) received by BOX
during the PIP. Such unrelated orders
may include agency orders on behalf of
Public Customers, market makers at
away exchanges and non-Box
Participant broker-dealers, as well as
non-PIP proprietary orders submitted by
Options Participants.
iv. The only exceptions to time
priority are: (1) No order for a nonmarket maker broker-dealer account of
an Options Participant may be executed
before all Public Customer order(s),
whether an Improvement Order,
including a CPO, or unrelated, and all
non-BOX Participant broker-dealer
order(s) at the same price have been
filled; (2) as provided in paragraph (f) of
this Section 18; and (3) as provided in
paragraphs (b) and (c) of Section 19
below. Any portion of an Improvement
Order left unfilled shall be cancelled.
(f) The PIP Participant who submitted
the Customer Order to the PIP process
for price improvement retains certain
priority and trade allocation privileges
upon conclusion of the PIP, as follows:
i. In instances in which the Primary
Improvement Order as modified (if at
all) is matched by or matches any
competing Improvement Order(s) and/or
non-Public Customers unrelated order(s)
at any price level, the PIP Participant
retains priority for only forty percent
(40%) of any unexecuted portion of the
Customer Order available at that price
level, notwithstanding the time priority
of the Primary Improvement Order,
competing Improvement Order(s) or
non-Public Customer unrelated order(s).
The PIP Participant who submitted the
Customer Order to the PIP process will
receive additional allocation only after
all other orders have been filled at that
price level.
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 29, 2005 / Notices
ii. The Primary Improvement Order
shall yield priority to certain competing
orders in the following circumstances:
1. When an order for the proprietary
account of an OFP is matched by or
matches any competing Public
Customer order(s), whether an
Improvement Order, including a CPO, or
unrelated order(s), or any non-BOX
Participant broker-dealer order(s) at any
price level, it shall yield priority to
them, including any priority provided
pursuant to subparagraph f(i), above.
2. When the unmodified Primary
Improvement Order for the account of a
Market Maker is matched by any
competing Public Customer order(s),
whether an Improvement Order,
including a CPO, or unrelated order, or
any non-BOX Participant broker-dealer
order(s) at the initial PIP price level, it
shall yield priority to all competing
Public Customer order(s) or non-BOX
Participant broker-dealer order(s),
including any priority provided
pursuant to subparagraph f(i), above.
3. When the modified Primary
Improvement Order for the account of a
Market Maker matches any competing
Public Customer order(s), whether an
Improvement Order, including a CPO, or
unrelated order, or any non-BOX
Participant broker-dealer order(s) at
subsequent price levels, it shall yield
priority to all competing Public
Customer order(s) or non-BOX
Participant broker-dealer order(s),
including any priority provided
pursuant to subparagraph f(i) above.
iii. In all cases in which the Primary
Improvement Order has priority
pursuant to the provisions of (i) and (ii)
above, it shall be entitled to a trade
allocation of at least one (1) contract.
Note: It shall be considered conduct
inconsistent with the just and equitable
principles of trade for any Options
Participant to engage in a pattern of conduct
where the Options Participant submits
Primary Improvement Orders into the PIP
process for 2 contracts or less for the purpose
of manipulating the PIP process in order to
gain a higher allocation percentage than the
Options Participant would have otherwise
received in accordance with the allocation
procedures set forth in this Section 18.
(g) In addition to Improvement Orders
submitted on behalf of Public
Customers, OFPs may provide access to
the PIP on behalf of a customer that is
not a broker-dealer (i.e. Public
Customer) in the form of a Customer PIP
Order (‘‘CPO’’) provided that:
i. The terms of each CPO shall include
a price stated in rounded five cent or ten
cent increments, as appropriate,
(‘‘standard tick’’) at which the order
shall be placed in the BOX Book (‘‘BOX
Book Reference Price’’) as well as a
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:01 Mar 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
specific price stated in one cent
increments (‘‘penny tick’’) at which the
Public Customer wishes to participate in
any PIPs (‘‘CPO PIP Reference Price’’)
that may occur while his order is on the
BOX Book and displayed at the BOX
Book Reference Price;
ii. The terms of each CPO shall
include a specific order size (‘‘CPO
Total Size’’). The number of contracts
that may be entered into a PIP must be
no greater than the lesser of (a) the CPO
Total Size remaining on the BOX Book
or (b) the size of the Primary
Improvement Order submitted to the
PIP;
iii. In order for the CPO to be eligible
for participation in a PIP in the subject
options series, the BOX Book Reference
Price for a CPO at the time a PIP
commences must be equal to the best
BOX price (i.e. the BBO).
iv. The CPO may only participate in
a PIP on the same side of the market as
the Primary Improvement Order.
v. Upon initiation of a PIP for which
a CPO is eligible to participate pursuant
to paragraphs (i)–(iv) above, the OFP
who submitted the CPO to the BOX
Book must submit a CPO to the PIP at
a price which is better than the BOX
Book Reference Price and at any price
level up to the CPO PIP Reference Price.
At any time during the PIP, the OFP
may modify the price of the CPO
submitted to the PIP to any price level
up to the CPO PIP Reference Price.
(h) [Unless assigned as a Market
Maker in the appropriate class, Options
Participants may enter a PIP Proprietary
Order (‘‘PPO’’) for their proprietary
account in a PIP provided that:
i. At the commencement of the PIP,
they already have an order on the BOX
Book for their proprietary account equal
to the best BOX price (i.e. the BBO).
ii. The size of the PPO entered into a
PIP must be no greater than the lesser
of (a) the total size remaining on the
BOX Book for the proprietary order or
(b) the size of the Primary Improvement
Order submitted to the PIP.
iii. At any time during the PIP, the
Options Participant may improve the
price of the PPO submitted to the PIP.]
[(i)] In cases where an executable
unrelated order is submitted to BOX on
the same side as the Customer Order,
such that it would cause an execution
to occur prior to the end of the PIP, the
PIP shall be deemed concluded and the
Customer Order shall be matched
pursuant to Paragraph (e)(iii) of this
Section 18, above.
It shall be considered conduct
inconsistent with just and equitable
principles of trade for any Participant to
enter unrelated orders into BOX for the
PO 00000
Frm 00141
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15957
purpose of disrupting or manipulating
the Improvement Period process.
(i)[(j)] Improvement Orders, including
CPOs[and PPOs], must be submitted in
increments no smaller than one penny
($.01). Improvement Orders, including
CPOs[and PPOs], will be displayed to
BOX Options Participants, but will not
be disseminated to OPRA.
(j)[(k)] Improvement Orders may not
be executed unless the price is better
than the NBBO at the commencement of
the PIP, except in the following
circumstances:
i. Where an Options Official
determines that quotes from one or more
particular markets in one or more
classes of options are not reliable, the
Options Official may direct the senior
person in charge of BOX’s Market
Control Center to exclude the unreliable
quotes from the Improvement Period
determination of the NBBO in the
particular option class(es). The Options
Official may determine quotes in one or
more particular options classes in a
market are not reliable only in the
following circumstances:
(1) Quotes Not Firm: A market’s
quotes in a particular options class are
not firm based upon direct
communication to the Exchange from
the market or the dissemination through
OPRA of a message indicating that
disseminated quotes are not firm;
(2) Confirmed Quote Problems: A
market has directly communicated to
the Exchange or otherwise confirmed
that the market is experiencing systems
or other problems affecting the
reliability of its disseminated quotes.
ii. The away options exchange posting
the NBBO is conducting a trading
rotation in that options class.
Supplementary Material to Section 18
01. Initially, and for at least a Pilot
Period of eighteen months from the
commencement of trading on BOX,
there will be no minimum size
requirement for Customer Orders to be
eligible for the PIP process. During this
Pilot Period, BOXR will submit certain
data, periodically as required by the
Commission, to provide supporting
evidence that, among other things, there
is meaningful competition for all size
PIP orders, that there is significant price
improvement for all orders executed
through the PIP, and that there is an
active and liquid market functioning on
BOX outside of the PIP mechanism. Any
data which is submitted to the
Commission by BOXR will be provided
on a confidential basis.
02. With respect to the same series, no
PIP will run simultaneously with
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
15958
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 29, 2005 / Notices
another PIP, nor will PIPs queue or
overlap in any manner.
*
*
*
*
*
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
BSE included statements concerning the
purpose of, and basis for, the proposed
rule change, as amended, and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposal. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in item IV below. The BSE has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposal would be
to eliminate certain restrictions on the
ability of Order Flow Providers, Market
Makers, and Public Customers (as
defined in sections 1(46), 1(32), and
1(50), respectively, of Chapter I of the
BOX Rules) to participate in BOX’s
price improvement period, the PIP.
After an Order Flow Provider or a
Market Maker submits a Customer Order
(as defined in section 1(20) of Chapter
I of the BOX Rules) to the PIP, the
proposal would permit Order Flow
Providers and Market Makers (except for
the Order Flow Provider or Market
Maker that submits the relevant Primary
Improvement Order 4) to submit
competing orders, ‘‘Improvement
Orders,’’ for their proprietary account;
and, in the case of all Order Flow
Providers, to submit Improvement
Orders for the account of a Public
Customer (as defined in section 1(19) of
Chapter I of the BOX Rules).
Improvement Orders may be submitted
in one-cent increments at the same price
as the Primary Improvement Order or at
an improved price, and for any size up
to the size of the Customer Order
submitted to the PIP.
Currently, to participate in the PIP,
unless an Options Participant (as
defined in section 1(40) of Chapter I of
the BOX Rules) is assigned as a Market
Maker in the relevant class, Options
Participants may compete only in a PIP
4 When an Options Participant submits a
Customer Order to the PIP, the Options Participant
also submits a matching contra order, the ‘‘Primary
Improvement Order,’’ on the opposite side of the
market than that of the Customer Order, and at a
higher bid (lower offer) than that of the national
best bid or offer (NBBO) at the time of the
commencement of the PIP.
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:01 Mar 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
for which: (1) They have submitted the
Customer Order to the PIP (through the
use of the Primary Improvement Order);
(2) they hold a Customer PIP Order (as
described below); or (3) they meet the
requirements of Section 18(h) of Chapter
V of the BOX Rules, which, among other
things, include the requirement that an
Options Participant have an order in the
relevant class on the BOX Book (as
defined in Section 1(12) of Chapter I of
the BOX Rules) for their proprietary
account equal to the best BOX price. If
an Options Participant is assigned as a
Market Maker in the relevant class, the
Options Participant is not required to
meet any of these requirements to
participate in the PIP.
Currently, a Public Customer may
participate in a PIP only if it has
provided an Order Flow Provider with
a Customer PIP Order. A Customer PIP
Order includes a specific order size; a
price stated in rounded five cent or ten
cent increments, as appropriate, at
which the order shall be placed in the
BOX Book (the ‘‘BOX Book Reference
Price’’); and a specific price stated in
one cent increments at which the Public
Customer wishes to participate in any
PIPs that may occur while his order is
on the BOX Book. Because of the
inclusion of the BOX Book Reference
Price, a Customer PIP Order is a hybrid
of an instruction and an order. While a
Customer PIP Order participates in a
PIP, the order is removed from the BOX
Book. Currently, a Customer PIP Order
can participate in a PIP only if the BOX
Book Reference Price is equal to the best
BOX price at the time a PIP commences.
BSE proposes to allow Order Flow
Providers to provide access to the PIP
on behalf of a Public Customer not only
through Customer PIP Orders, but
through any type of instruction they
wish to accept, so long as the
Improvement Order (like a Customer
PIP Order) is identified as a Public
Customer Order when it is submitted to
the PIP. This identification is necessary
for purposes of allocation priority.
Customer PIP Orders would no longer
be the only Improvement Orders that
could be Public Customer Orders.
BSE also proposes to eliminate the
requirement that Options Participants,
unless assigned as a Market Maker in
the appropriate class, have an order on
the BOX Book for their proprietary
account equal to the best BOX price
before a PIP commences to participate
in the PIP. All references to the PIP
Proprietary Order would be eliminated
from the BOX Rules because all Options
Participants (except for the Order Flow
Provider or Market Maker that submits
the relevant Primary Improvement
Order to the PIP) could submit
PO 00000
Frm 00142
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Improvement Orders for their
proprietary accounts without
restrictions, and this separate order type
would no longer be necessary.
The Commission recently approved
the proposal of the International
Securities Exchange (the ‘‘ISE’’) to
establish a price improvement
mechanism (the ‘‘PIM’’).5 The ISE’s
rules relating to the PIM do not include
the restrictions discussed above, and
some of BOX’s Order Flow Providers
have requested that BSE modify BOX’s
rules in this manner to remain
competitive with the ISE.
BSE believes that the elimination of
the restrictions on when Options
Participants and Public Customers can
compete in the PIP would increase the
opportunity for them to participate in
the PIP, and could lead to more robust
competition in the PIP. BSE does not
believe that the elimination of these
restrictions would have a negative
impact on the incentives for BOX
Market Makers to quote competitively.
The primary incentives for BOX Market
Makers to quote competitively are
BOX’s general price/time priority rules
and the trade allocation priority granted
to the Market Maker Prime. A Market
Maker Prime is a Market Maker who has
a quote that is equal to the NBBO on the
same side of the market as the Primary
Improvement Order at the initiation of
the PIP. If more than one Market Maker
meets this criterion, the Market Maker
whose quote has time priority would be
the Market Maker Prime for that PIP.
A Market Maker designated as the
Market Maker Prime 6 would have
priority over all other Improvement
Orders and unrelated orders up to onethird of the portion of the Customer
Order remaining at the price level of the
Market Maker Prime’s Improvement
Order. This priority encourages Market
Makers to quote aggressively.7
BSE proposes to retain the Customer
PIP Order because it provides Public
Customers with the ability to have an
order on the BOX Book and participate
in a PIP without risking double liability.
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50819
(December 8, 2004); 69 FR 75093 (December 15,
2004) (‘‘PIM Approval Order’’).
6 This special priority, however, would apply
only if the Market Maker Prime enters an
Improvement Order during the PIP.
7 In its approval of BOX, the Commission stated
that it ‘‘believes that the BSE’s proposal to give
priority to a Market Maker who quotes aggressively
before a PIP is initiated, is consistent with the Act
and may provide a further incentive for Market
Makers to publicly display their best quotes, which
would benefit all options market participants.’’ See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49068 (January
13, 2004); 69 FR 2775 (January 20, 2004).
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 29, 2005 / Notices
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposal, as amended, is consistent with
the requirements of section 6(b) of the
Act,8 in general, and section 6(b)(5) of
the Act,9 in particular, in that it is
designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and
protect investors and the public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change, as amended,
will result in any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received written comments with respect
to the proposed rule change, as
amended.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the Exchange consents,
the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed
rule change, as amended; or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change, as
amended, should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
20549–0609.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BSE–2005–01. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change, as amended, that are filed with
the Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change, as amended,
between the Commission and any
person, other than those that may be
withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will
be available for inspection and copying
in the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the BSE. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BSE–2005–01 and should
be submitted on or before April 19,
2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–1383 Filed 3–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–BSE–2005–01 on the
subject line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–51412; File No. SR–FICC–
2004–13]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change To
Amend the Rules of the MortgageBacked Securities Division To Impose
Fines on Members for Violations of
Minimum Financial Standards and To
Modify the Penalty Assessment
Process for Failures of Members To
Submit Requisite Financial Reports on
a Timely Basis
March 23, 2005.
I. Introduction
On June 24, 2004, the Fixed Income
Clearing Corporation (‘‘FICC’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) and on
February 2, 2005, amended proposed
rule change SR–FICC–2004–13 pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’).1 Notice
of the proposal was published in the
Federal Register on February 16, 2005.2
No comment letters were received. For
the reasons discussed below, the
Commission is approving the proposed
rule change.
II. Description
FICC is seeking to amend the rules of
its Mortgage-Backed Securities Division
(‘‘MBSD’’) to impose fines on members
for violations of minimum financial
standards and to modify the penalty
assessment process for failures of
members to submit requisite financial
reports on a timely basis.
1. Violations of Minimum Financial
Standards
The rules of the MBSD require
clearing members to meet and maintain
certain minimum financial standards at
all times. While the majority of MBSD
members consistently satisfy their
minimum financial requirements,
occasionally members breach these
requirements and create undue risk for
FICC and its members.
Currently, the MBSD rules do not
impose specific margin consequences
for falling out of compliance with
minimum financial requirements but
allow the Membership and Risk
Management Committee in its discretion
to impose conditions which can include
an increase in the participant’s
minimum required deposits to the
Participants Fund.
1 15
8 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:01 Mar 28, 2005
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Exchange Act Release No. 51146
(February 7, 2005), 70 FR 7984.
2 Securities
10 17
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00143
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15959
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 29, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15955-15959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-1383]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-51418; File No. SR-BSE-2005-01]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule
Change, and Amendment No. 1 Thereto, by the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc.
Relating to the Price Improvement Period Under the Rules of the Boston
Options Exchange Facility
March 23, 2005.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
[[Page 15956]]
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 4, 2005, the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc. (``BSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in items I, II,
and III below, which items have been prepared by the BSE. On March 22,
2005, the BSE filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\3\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Amendment No. 1 superseded and replaced the original filing
in its entirety.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The BSE proposes to modify the rules of the Boston Options Exchange
Facility (``BOX'') that relate to the Price Improvement Period (the
``PIP'') to eliminate certain restrictions on the ability of Order Flow
Providers, Market Makers, and Public Customers (as defined in sections
1(46), 1(32), and 1(50), respectively, of Chapter I of the BOX Rules)
to participate in the PIP.
Below is the amended text of the proposed rule change. Proposed new
language is in italics; proposed deletions are in [brackets].
* * * * *
Rules of the Boston Stock Exchange
Rules of the Boston Options Exchange Facility
Trading of Options Contracts on BOX
Chapter V
Sec. 18 The Price Improvement Period (``PIP'')
(a) through (d) No change.
(e) Options Participants, both OFPs and Market Makers, executing
agency orders may designate BOX-Top and marketable limit Customer
Orders for price improvement and submission to the PIP. Customer Orders
designated for the PIP shall be submitted to BOX with a matching contra
order, the ``Primary Improvement Order'', equal to the full size of the
Customer Order. The Primary Improvement Order shall be on the opposite
side of the market than that of the Customer Order and represent a
higher bid (lower offer) than that of the National Best Bid Offer
(NBBO) at the time of the commencement of the PIP. BOX will not permit
a PIP to commence unless at least three (3) Market Makers were quoting
in the relevant series at the time an Options Participant submits a
Primary Improvement Order to initiate a PIP. BOX will commence a PIP by
broadcasting a message to Participants that (1) states that a Primary
Improvement Order has been processed; (2) contains information
concerning series, size, price and side of market, and; (3) states when
the PIP will conclude (``PIP Broadcast'').
i. The PIP shall be 3 seconds, commencing upon the dissemination of
the PIP Broadcast. [During the PIP, Market Makers may submit competing
orders, ``Improvement Orders'', for only those classes within their
appointment. Unless assigned as a Market Maker in the appropriate
class, Options Participants may submit Improvement Orders only in a PIP
for which, (1) they have submitted the Primary Improvement Order; (2)
they hold a Customer PIP Order, (``CPO''), in accordance with the
requirements of Paragraph (g) of this Section 18; or (3) they meet the
PIP Proprietary Order (``PPO'') requirements of Paragraph (h) of this
Section 18.] During the PIP, Order Flow Providers and Market Makers
(except for the Order Flow Provider or Market Maker that submits the
relevant Primary Improvement Order) may submit competing orders,
``Improvement Orders,'' for their own account. Order Flow Providers may
submit Improvement Orders for the account of a Public Customer under
any type of instruction they wish to accept. Order Flow Providers may
also provide access to the PIP on behalf of a Public Customer in the
form of a CPO (as set forth in subparagraph (g) below). An Improvement
Order submitted to the PIP for the account of a Public Customer,
including a CPO, must be identified as a Public Customer Order. [Market
Makers and ]Options Participants [meeting the foregoing criteria] who
submit Improvement Orders for a PIP, including CPOs, shall be deemed
``PIP Participants'' for that specific PIP only, and may continually
submit competing Improvement Orders during that PIP. During the PIP,
Improvement Orders shall be disseminated solely to Options
Participants.
ii. The Options Participant who submitted the Primary Improvement
Order is not permitted to cancel or to modify the size of its Primary
Improvement Order or the Customer Order at any time during the PIP, and
may modify only the price of its Primary Improvement Order by improving
it. The subsequent price modifications to a Primary Improvement Order
are treated as new Improvement Orders for the sake of establishing
priority in the PIP process. Options Participants that are permitted to
submit Improvement Orders (as set forth in subparagraph i.
above)[Market Makers, except for a Market Maker that submits the
relevant Primary Improvement Order,] may: (1) Submit competing
Improvement Order(s) for any size up to the size of the Customer Order;
(2) submit competing Improvement Order(s) for any price equal to or
better than the Primary Improvement Order; (3) improve the price of
their Improvement Order(s) at any point during the PIP; and (4)
decrease the size of their Improvement Order(s) only by improving the
price of that order. Improvement Orders may be submitted in one-cent
increments.
iii. At the conclusion of the PIP, the Customer Order shall be
matched against the best prevailing order(s) on BOX, in accordance with
price/time priority as set forth in Section 16 of this Chapter V,
whether Improvement Order(s), including CPO(s) [and PPO(s)], or
unrelated order(s) received by BOX during the PIP. Such unrelated
orders may include agency orders on behalf of Public Customers, market
makers at away exchanges and non-Box Participant broker-dealers, as
well as non-PIP proprietary orders submitted by Options Participants.
iv. The only exceptions to time priority are: (1) No order for a
non-market maker broker-dealer account of an Options Participant may be
executed before all Public Customer order(s), whether an Improvement
Order, including a CPO, or unrelated, and all non-BOX Participant
broker-dealer order(s) at the same price have been filled; (2) as
provided in paragraph (f) of this Section 18; and (3) as provided in
paragraphs (b) and (c) of Section 19 below. Any portion of an
Improvement Order left unfilled shall be cancelled.
(f) The PIP Participant who submitted the Customer Order to the PIP
process for price improvement retains certain priority and trade
allocation privileges upon conclusion of the PIP, as follows:
i. In instances in which the Primary Improvement Order as modified
(if at all) is matched by or matches any competing Improvement Order(s)
and/or non-Public Customers unrelated order(s) at any price level, the
PIP Participant retains priority for only forty percent (40%) of any
unexecuted portion of the Customer Order available at that price level,
notwithstanding the time priority of the Primary Improvement Order,
competing Improvement Order(s) or non-Public Customer unrelated
order(s). The PIP Participant who submitted the Customer Order to the
PIP process will receive additional allocation only after all other
orders have been filled at that price level.
[[Page 15957]]
ii. The Primary Improvement Order shall yield priority to certain
competing orders in the following circumstances:
1. When an order for the proprietary account of an OFP is matched
by or matches any competing Public Customer order(s), whether an
Improvement Order, including a CPO, or unrelated order(s), or any non-
BOX Participant broker-dealer order(s) at any price level, it shall
yield priority to them, including any priority provided pursuant to
subparagraph f(i), above.
2. When the unmodified Primary Improvement Order for the account of
a Market Maker is matched by any competing Public Customer order(s),
whether an Improvement Order, including a CPO, or unrelated order, or
any non-BOX Participant broker-dealer order(s) at the initial PIP price
level, it shall yield priority to all competing Public Customer
order(s) or non-BOX Participant broker-dealer order(s), including any
priority provided pursuant to subparagraph f(i), above.
3. When the modified Primary Improvement Order for the account of a
Market Maker matches any competing Public Customer order(s), whether an
Improvement Order, including a CPO, or unrelated order, or any non-BOX
Participant broker-dealer order(s) at subsequent price levels, it shall
yield priority to all competing Public Customer order(s) or non-BOX
Participant broker-dealer order(s), including any priority provided
pursuant to subparagraph f(i) above.
iii. In all cases in which the Primary Improvement Order has
priority pursuant to the provisions of (i) and (ii) above, it shall be
entitled to a trade allocation of at least one (1) contract.
Note: It shall be considered conduct inconsistent with the just
and equitable principles of trade for any Options Participant to
engage in a pattern of conduct where the Options Participant submits
Primary Improvement Orders into the PIP process for 2 contracts or
less for the purpose of manipulating the PIP process in order to
gain a higher allocation percentage than the Options Participant
would have otherwise received in accordance with the allocation
procedures set forth in this Section 18.
(g) In addition to Improvement Orders submitted on behalf of Public
Customers, OFPs may provide access to the PIP on behalf of a customer
that is not a broker-dealer (i.e. Public Customer) in the form of a
Customer PIP Order (``CPO'') provided that:
i. The terms of each CPO shall include a price stated in rounded
five cent or ten cent increments, as appropriate, (``standard tick'')
at which the order shall be placed in the BOX Book (``BOX Book
Reference Price'') as well as a specific price stated in one cent
increments (``penny tick'') at which the Public Customer wishes to
participate in any PIPs (``CPO PIP Reference Price'') that may occur
while his order is on the BOX Book and displayed at the BOX Book
Reference Price;
ii. The terms of each CPO shall include a specific order size
(``CPO Total Size''). The number of contracts that may be entered into
a PIP must be no greater than the lesser of (a) the CPO Total Size
remaining on the BOX Book or (b) the size of the Primary Improvement
Order submitted to the PIP;
iii. In order for the CPO to be eligible for participation in a PIP
in the subject options series, the BOX Book Reference Price for a CPO
at the time a PIP commences must be equal to the best BOX price (i.e.
the BBO).
iv. The CPO may only participate in a PIP on the same side of the
market as the Primary Improvement Order.
v. Upon initiation of a PIP for which a CPO is eligible to
participate pursuant to paragraphs (i)-(iv) above, the OFP who
submitted the CPO to the BOX Book must submit a CPO to the PIP at a
price which is better than the BOX Book Reference Price and at any
price level up to the CPO PIP Reference Price. At any time during the
PIP, the OFP may modify the price of the CPO submitted to the PIP to
any price level up to the CPO PIP Reference Price.
(h) [Unless assigned as a Market Maker in the appropriate class,
Options Participants may enter a PIP Proprietary Order (``PPO'') for
their proprietary account in a PIP provided that:
i. At the commencement of the PIP, they already have an order on
the BOX Book for their proprietary account equal to the best BOX price
(i.e. the BBO).
ii. The size of the PPO entered into a PIP must be no greater than
the lesser of (a) the total size remaining on the BOX Book for the
proprietary order or (b) the size of the Primary Improvement Order
submitted to the PIP.
iii. At any time during the PIP, the Options Participant may
improve the price of the PPO submitted to the PIP.]
[(i)] In cases where an executable unrelated order is submitted to
BOX on the same side as the Customer Order, such that it would cause an
execution to occur prior to the end of the PIP, the PIP shall be deemed
concluded and the Customer Order shall be matched pursuant to Paragraph
(e)(iii) of this Section 18, above.
It shall be considered conduct inconsistent with just and equitable
principles of trade for any Participant to enter unrelated orders into
BOX for the purpose of disrupting or manipulating the Improvement
Period process.
(i)[(j)] Improvement Orders, including CPOs[ and PPOs], must be
submitted in increments no smaller than one penny ($.01). Improvement
Orders, including CPOs[ and PPOs], will be displayed to BOX Options
Participants, but will not be disseminated to OPRA.
(j)[(k)] Improvement Orders may not be executed unless the price is
better than the NBBO at the commencement of the PIP, except in the
following circumstances:
i. Where an Options Official determines that quotes from one or
more particular markets in one or more classes of options are not
reliable, the Options Official may direct the senior person in charge
of BOX's Market Control Center to exclude the unreliable quotes from
the Improvement Period determination of the NBBO in the particular
option class(es). The Options Official may determine quotes in one or
more particular options classes in a market are not reliable only in
the following circumstances:
(1) Quotes Not Firm: A market's quotes in a particular options
class are not firm based upon direct communication to the Exchange from
the market or the dissemination through OPRA of a message indicating
that disseminated quotes are not firm;
(2) Confirmed Quote Problems: A market has directly communicated to
the Exchange or otherwise confirmed that the market is experiencing
systems or other problems affecting the reliability of its disseminated
quotes.
ii. The away options exchange posting the NBBO is conducting a
trading rotation in that options class.
Supplementary Material to Section 18
01. Initially, and for at least a Pilot Period of eighteen months
from the commencement of trading on BOX, there will be no minimum size
requirement for Customer Orders to be eligible for the PIP process.
During this Pilot Period, BOXR will submit certain data, periodically
as required by the Commission, to provide supporting evidence that,
among other things, there is meaningful competition for all size PIP
orders, that there is significant price improvement for all orders
executed through the PIP, and that there is an active and liquid market
functioning on BOX outside of the PIP mechanism. Any data which is
submitted to the Commission by BOXR will be provided on a confidential
basis.
02. With respect to the same series, no PIP will run simultaneously
with
[[Page 15958]]
another PIP, nor will PIPs queue or overlap in any manner.
* * * * *
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the BSE included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change, as
amended, and discussed any comments it received on the proposal. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
item IV below. The BSE has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposal would be to eliminate certain
restrictions on the ability of Order Flow Providers, Market Makers, and
Public Customers (as defined in sections 1(46), 1(32), and 1(50),
respectively, of Chapter I of the BOX Rules) to participate in BOX's
price improvement period, the PIP. After an Order Flow Provider or a
Market Maker submits a Customer Order (as defined in section 1(20) of
Chapter I of the BOX Rules) to the PIP, the proposal would permit Order
Flow Providers and Market Makers (except for the Order Flow Provider or
Market Maker that submits the relevant Primary Improvement Order \4\)
to submit competing orders, ``Improvement Orders,'' for their
proprietary account; and, in the case of all Order Flow Providers, to
submit Improvement Orders for the account of a Public Customer (as
defined in section 1(19) of Chapter I of the BOX Rules). Improvement
Orders may be submitted in one-cent increments at the same price as the
Primary Improvement Order or at an improved price, and for any size up
to the size of the Customer Order submitted to the PIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ When an Options Participant submits a Customer Order to the
PIP, the Options Participant also submits a matching contra order,
the ``Primary Improvement Order,'' on the opposite side of the
market than that of the Customer Order, and at a higher bid (lower
offer) than that of the national best bid or offer (NBBO) at the
time of the commencement of the PIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, to participate in the PIP, unless an Options Participant
(as defined in section 1(40) of Chapter I of the BOX Rules) is assigned
as a Market Maker in the relevant class, Options Participants may
compete only in a PIP for which: (1) They have submitted the Customer
Order to the PIP (through the use of the Primary Improvement Order);
(2) they hold a Customer PIP Order (as described below); or (3) they
meet the requirements of Section 18(h) of Chapter V of the BOX Rules,
which, among other things, include the requirement that an Options
Participant have an order in the relevant class on the BOX Book (as
defined in Section 1(12) of Chapter I of the BOX Rules) for their
proprietary account equal to the best BOX price. If an Options
Participant is assigned as a Market Maker in the relevant class, the
Options Participant is not required to meet any of these requirements
to participate in the PIP.
Currently, a Public Customer may participate in a PIP only if it
has provided an Order Flow Provider with a Customer PIP Order. A
Customer PIP Order includes a specific order size; a price stated in
rounded five cent or ten cent increments, as appropriate, at which the
order shall be placed in the BOX Book (the ``BOX Book Reference
Price''); and a specific price stated in one cent increments at which
the Public Customer wishes to participate in any PIPs that may occur
while his order is on the BOX Book. Because of the inclusion of the BOX
Book Reference Price, a Customer PIP Order is a hybrid of an
instruction and an order. While a Customer PIP Order participates in a
PIP, the order is removed from the BOX Book. Currently, a Customer PIP
Order can participate in a PIP only if the BOX Book Reference Price is
equal to the best BOX price at the time a PIP commences.
BSE proposes to allow Order Flow Providers to provide access to the
PIP on behalf of a Public Customer not only through Customer PIP
Orders, but through any type of instruction they wish to accept, so
long as the Improvement Order (like a Customer PIP Order) is identified
as a Public Customer Order when it is submitted to the PIP. This
identification is necessary for purposes of allocation priority.
Customer PIP Orders would no longer be the only Improvement Orders that
could be Public Customer Orders.
BSE also proposes to eliminate the requirement that Options
Participants, unless assigned as a Market Maker in the appropriate
class, have an order on the BOX Book for their proprietary account
equal to the best BOX price before a PIP commences to participate in
the PIP. All references to the PIP Proprietary Order would be
eliminated from the BOX Rules because all Options Participants (except
for the Order Flow Provider or Market Maker that submits the relevant
Primary Improvement Order to the PIP) could submit Improvement Orders
for their proprietary accounts without restrictions, and this separate
order type would no longer be necessary.
The Commission recently approved the proposal of the International
Securities Exchange (the ``ISE'') to establish a price improvement
mechanism (the ``PIM'').\5\ The ISE's rules relating to the PIM do not
include the restrictions discussed above, and some of BOX's Order Flow
Providers have requested that BSE modify BOX's rules in this manner to
remain competitive with the ISE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50819 (December 8,
2004); 69 FR 75093 (December 15, 2004) (``PIM Approval Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BSE believes that the elimination of the restrictions on when
Options Participants and Public Customers can compete in the PIP would
increase the opportunity for them to participate in the PIP, and could
lead to more robust competition in the PIP. BSE does not believe that
the elimination of these restrictions would have a negative impact on
the incentives for BOX Market Makers to quote competitively. The
primary incentives for BOX Market Makers to quote competitively are
BOX's general price/time priority rules and the trade allocation
priority granted to the Market Maker Prime. A Market Maker Prime is a
Market Maker who has a quote that is equal to the NBBO on the same side
of the market as the Primary Improvement Order at the initiation of the
PIP. If more than one Market Maker meets this criterion, the Market
Maker whose quote has time priority would be the Market Maker Prime for
that PIP.
A Market Maker designated as the Market Maker Prime \6\ would have
priority over all other Improvement Orders and unrelated orders up to
one-third of the portion of the Customer Order remaining at the price
level of the Market Maker Prime's Improvement Order. This priority
encourages Market Makers to quote aggressively.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ This special priority, however, would apply only if the
Market Maker Prime enters an Improvement Order during the PIP.
\7\ In its approval of BOX, the Commission stated that it
``believes that the BSE's proposal to give priority to a Market
Maker who quotes aggressively before a PIP is initiated, is
consistent with the Act and may provide a further incentive for
Market Makers to publicly display their best quotes, which would
benefit all options market participants.'' See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 49068 (January 13, 2004); 69 FR 2775 (January 20,
2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BSE proposes to retain the Customer PIP Order because it provides
Public Customers with the ability to have an order on the BOX Book and
participate in a PIP without risking double liability.
[[Page 15959]]
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposal, as amended, is consistent
with the requirements of section 6(b) of the Act,\8\ in general, and
section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\9\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change, as
amended, will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary
or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received written comments with
respect to the proposed rule change, as amended.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule change, as amended; or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BSE-2005-01 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20549-0609.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BSE-2005-01. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change, as
amended, that are filed with the Commission, and all written
communications relating to the proposed rule change, as amended,
between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be
withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's
Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the BSE. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BSE-2005-01 and should be
submitted on or before April 19, 2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-1383 Filed 3-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P