Hollister, Inc., Kirksville Manufacturing, Kirksville, MO; Notice of Determination of Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on Remand, 15648 [E5-1346]
Download as PDF
15648
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 58 / Monday, March 28, 2005 / Notices
APPENDIX—Continued
[Petitions instituted between 02/28/2005 and 03/04/2005]
Subject firm
(petitioners)
Location
Beverly Enterprise (Wkrs) ...............................
Industrial Metal Products (State) .....................
Lobdell-Emery/Oxford Automotive (Wkrs) .......
American Express (Wkrs) ................................
Intel (Wkrs) ......................................................
Roaring and Cumberland Mfg., Inc. (Comp) ...
Global Textile Robotics, LLC (Wkrs) ...............
McDade Apparel, LLC (Wkrs) .........................
KL-Arrow, Inc. (Comp) .....................................
Lands’ End (Wkrs) ...........................................
Fort Smith, AR .................................................
Lansing, MI ......................................................
Greencastle, IN ................................................
Phoenix, AZ .....................................................
Hillsboro, OR ...................................................
Sparta, TN .......................................................
Greenville, SC .................................................
Warrenton, NC .................................................
Asheboro, NC ..................................................
Dodgeville, WI .................................................
TA–W
56,679
56,680
56,681
56,682
56,683
56,684
56,685
56,686
56,687
56,688
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
[FR Doc. E5–1363 Filed 3–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–53,997]
Hollister, Inc., Kirksville
Manufacturing, Kirksville, MO; Notice
of Determination of Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance on Remand
The U.S. Court of International Trade
(USCIT) granted the Secretary of Labor’s
motion for a voluntary remand for
further investigation in Former
Employees of Hollister, Inc. v. Elaine
Chao, U.S. Secretary of Labor, No. 04–
00262, on February 1, 2005.
The workers of Hollister, Inc.,
Kirksville Manufacturing, Kirksville,
Missouri (‘‘Hollister’’) were certified as
eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) on February 11, 2004.
The Notice of determination was
published in the Federal Register on
March 12, 2004 (69 FR 11890).
By letter dated March 19, 2004, the
United Automotive Workers, Local 710,
requested that Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) be
included in the TAA petition. The
request was dismissed because the
application for ATAA was not filed with
the TAA petition, as required by the
Secretary’s interpretation of Section 246
of the Trade Act, Training and
Employment Guidance Letter No. 2–03
(August 6, 2003). 69 FR 60904, October
13, 2004.
On June 28, 2004, the Plaintiff
appealed to the USCIT, asserting that
the workers were not provided the
assistance and opportunity to request
ATAA because the requirements for
applying for ATAA were ambiguous.
On October 29, 2004, the Department
issued Training and Employment
Guidance Letter No. 2–03, Change 2,
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:12 Mar 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
‘‘Requests for Certification under the
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) Program for Certain
Worker Groups Covered by Certified
TAA Petitions’’ (TEGL 2–03, Change 2).
70 FR 8829–02, February 23, 2005. The
Department’s new TEGL concerning the
filing of requests for group ATAA
certification provides that worker
groups whose petitions were still in
process at the time of implementation of
the ATAA program on August 6, 2003
and certified worker groups who filed
petitions which did not include an
option to apply for ATAA may request
group ATAA certification after the filing
of a TAA petition.
The Department construes the
Plaintiff’s letters as timely requests for
group ATAA certification under TEGL
2–03, Change 2. Accordingly, the
Department has conducted an
investigation to determine the workers’
eligibility to apply for ATAA
certification.
The group eligibility certification
criteria for the ATAA program under
Section 246 the Trade Act of 1974 (19
U.S.C. 2813), as amended, established
that the Department must determine
whether a significant number of workers
in the workers’ firm are 50 years of age
or older, whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable, and whether the
competitive conditions within the
workers’ industry are adverse.
The remand investigation revealed
that at least five percent of the
workforce at the subject firm is at least
fifty years of age, the workers possess
skills that are not easily transferable,
and competitive conditions within the
industry are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts, I
conclude that the requirements of
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended, have been met for workers at
the subject firm. In accordance with the
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Date of
institution
03/03/2005
03/04/2005
03/04/2005
03/04/2005
03/04/2005
03/04/2005
03/04/2005
03/04/2005
03/04/2005
03/04/2005
Date of
petition
03/02/2005
02/24/2005
03/03/2005
03/03/2005
03/03/2005
03/01/2005
03/01/2005
03/03/2005
03/02/2005
03/03/2005
provisions of the Act, I make the
following certification:
All workers at Hollister, Inc., Kirksville
Manufacturing, Kirksville, Missouri, who
became totally or partially separated from
employment on or after January 7, 2003
through February 11, 2006, are eligible to
apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are
also eligible to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of
March, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–1346 Filed 3–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–56,497]
Johnson Controls, Inc., Wamsutta
Plant, Anderson, SC; Notice of
Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, an investigation was
initiated on February 4, 2005 in
response to a petition filed by a
company official on behalf of workers at
Johnson Controls, Inc., Wamsutta Plant,
Anderson, South Carolina. Johnson
Controls is an on site leased worker
company for Springs Industries
Wamsutta Plant, Anderson, South
Carolina.
The petitioning group of workers is
covered by an active certification, (TA–
W–56,295A) which expires on February
16, 2007. Consequently, further
investigation in this case would serve
no purpose; therefore the investigation
under this petition has been terminated.
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 58 (Monday, March 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 15648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-1346]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-53,997]
Hollister, Inc., Kirksville Manufacturing, Kirksville, MO; Notice
of Determination of Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on Remand
The U.S. Court of International Trade (USCIT) granted the Secretary
of Labor's motion for a voluntary remand for further investigation in
Former Employees of Hollister, Inc. v. Elaine Chao, U.S. Secretary of
Labor, No. 04-00262, on February 1, 2005.
The workers of Hollister, Inc., Kirksville Manufacturing,
Kirksville, Missouri (``Hollister'') were certified as eligible to
apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) on February 11, 2004. The
Notice of determination was published in the Federal Register on March
12, 2004 (69 FR 11890).
By letter dated March 19, 2004, the United Automotive Workers,
Local 710, requested that Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
(ATAA) be included in the TAA petition. The request was dismissed
because the application for ATAA was not filed with the TAA petition,
as required by the Secretary's interpretation of Section 246 of the
Trade Act, Training and Employment Guidance Letter No. 2-03 (August 6,
2003). 69 FR 60904, October 13, 2004.
On June 28, 2004, the Plaintiff appealed to the USCIT, asserting
that the workers were not provided the assistance and opportunity to
request ATAA because the requirements for applying for ATAA were
ambiguous.
On October 29, 2004, the Department issued Training and Employment
Guidance Letter No. 2-03, Change 2, ``Requests for Certification under
the Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) Program for Certain
Worker Groups Covered by Certified TAA Petitions'' (TEGL 2-03, Change
2). 70 FR 8829-02, February 23, 2005. The Department's new TEGL
concerning the filing of requests for group ATAA certification provides
that worker groups whose petitions were still in process at the time of
implementation of the ATAA program on August 6, 2003 and certified
worker groups who filed petitions which did not include an option to
apply for ATAA may request group ATAA certification after the filing of
a TAA petition.
The Department construes the Plaintiff's letters as timely requests
for group ATAA certification under TEGL 2-03, Change 2. Accordingly,
the Department has conducted an investigation to determine the workers'
eligibility to apply for ATAA certification.
The group eligibility certification criteria for the ATAA program
under Section 246 the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2813), as amended,
established that the Department must determine whether a significant
number of workers in the workers' firm are 50 years of age or older,
whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable, and whether the competitive conditions within the
workers' industry are adverse.
The remand investigation revealed that at least five percent of the
workforce at the subject firm is at least fifty years of age, the
workers possess skills that are not easily transferable, and
competitive conditions within the industry are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts, I conclude that the requirements
of Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, have been met for
workers at the subject firm. In accordance with the provisions of the
Act, I make the following certification:
All workers at Hollister, Inc., Kirksville Manufacturing,
Kirksville, Missouri, who became totally or partially separated from
employment on or after January 7, 2003 through February 11, 2006,
are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of
the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the
Trade Act of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of March, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-1346 Filed 3-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P