Citation Corporation, Camden, TN; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration on Remand, 15646-15647 [E5-1345]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
15646
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 58 / Monday, March 28, 2005 / Notices
APPENDIX—Continued
[Petitions instituted between 02/14/2005 and 02/25/2005]
Subject firm
(petitioners)
Location
General Motors Corp. (Comp) .........................
Longwear Hosiery Mill, Inc. (Comp) ................
Tee Jays Manufacturing Co., Inc. (Comp) ......
Codet Newport Corp. (Wkrs) ...........................
Vishay Dale Electronics, Inc. (State) ...............
Datex—Ohmeda, Inc. (Comp) .........................
Sherwood Harsco Gas Service (USWA) .........
Collins and Aikman (USWA) ...........................
Celestica (Comp) .............................................
Syracuse China (Wkrs) ...................................
Kopin Corporation (Comp) ..............................
Green Acre Creation, Inc. (Comp) ..................
M.J. Soffee Co. (Comp) ..................................
Oneida Ltd. (Comp) .........................................
Valspar (Wkrs) .................................................
Prism Technology and Assemblies, LLC
(Comp).
ATS (Automation Tooling Systems) (State) ....
Stant Manufacturing, Inc. (UAW) ....................
Turtle Fur Company (Comp) ...........................
America Online, Inc. (Wkrs) ............................
Truth Hardware (GMP) ....................................
Zodiac American Pools (Wkrs) ........................
Wheatland Tube Company (USWA) ...............
Stillwater Forest Products (Comp) ..................
Pontiac, MI .......................................................
Hillebran, NC ...................................................
Florence, AL ....................................................
Colebrook, NH .................................................
Norfolk, NE ......................................................
Louisville, CO ..................................................
Washington, PA ...............................................
Canton, OH ......................................................
Mt. Pleasant, IA ...............................................
Syracuse, NY ...................................................
Taunton, MA ....................................................
Long Island City, NY .......................................
Bladenboro, NC ...............................................
Sherrill, NY ......................................................
Galax, VA ........................................................
Meadville, PA ...................................................
02/23/2005
02/23/2005
02/23/2005
02/23/2005
02/24/2005
02/24/2005
02/24/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/15/2005
02/21/2005
02/21/2005
02/18/2005
02/22/2005
02/21/2005
02/22/2005
02/22/2005
02/22/2005
02/08/2005
02/16/2005
02/08/2005
02/09/2005
02/21/2005
02/17/2005
02/10/2005
McAllen, TX .....................................................
Connersville, IN ...............................................
Morrisville, VT ..................................................
Oklahoma City, OK ..........................................
West Hazleton, PA ..........................................
Midway, GA .....................................................
Warren, OH .....................................................
Kalispell, MT ....................................................
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/23/2005
02/01/2005
02/16/2005
02/16/2005
02/22/2005
02/02/2005
02/04/2005
02/23/2005
TA–W
56,624
56,625
56,626
56,627
56,628
56,629
56,630
56,631
56,632
56,633
56,634
56,635
56,636
56,637
56,638
56,639
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
56,640
56,641
56,642
56,643
56,644
56,645
56,646
56,647
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
[FR Doc. E5–1359 Filed 3–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–53,753]
Citation Corporation, Camden, TN;
Notice of Negative Determination on
Reconsideration on Remand
The United States Court of
International Trade (USCIT) granted the
Secretary of Labor’s motion for a
voluntary remand in Former Employees
of Citation Corporation v. Elaine Chao,
U.S. Secretary of Labor, Court No. 04–
00198, on February 7, 2005. The
Department of Labor (Department)
requested the remand to clarify the basis
for its denial of the Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) petition dated
December 9, 2003, filed by the
Tennessee AFL–CIO on behalf of
workers of the subject firm.
The Department terminated the
investigation of TA–W–53,753 because
no new information or change in
circumstance was evident which would
have resulted in the reversal of a
previous negative determination
applicable to the same worker group
(TA–W–51,871, denied on June 16,
2003). The Notice of Termination was
issued on December 11, 2003 and
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:12 Mar 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
published in the Federal Register on
January 7, 2004 (69 FR 940).
By letter dated February 5, 2004, the
union representative requested
administrative review of the
Department’s action regarding the
subject worker group.
By letter dated March 17, 2004, the
Department dismissed the request for
reconsideration. The Dismissal of
Application for Reconsideration was
issued on March 30, 2004 and published
in the Federal Register on April 6, 2004
(69 FR 18107).
On May 12, 2004, the Plaintiff applied
to the USCIT for judicial review,
asserting that the Department’s
determination regarding petitioners TA–
W–51,871 and TA–W–53,753 were in
error.
Petitioners have sixty days from the
date the Department’s determination is
published in the Federal Register to file
for judicial review. The determination
regarding TA–W–51,871 was published
in the Federal Register on July 3, 2003
(68 FR 39976). The period to seek
judicial review of TA–W–51,871
expired on September 1, 2003. Because
the Plaintiff did not file an appeal with
the USCIT until May 12, 2004, the
determination regarding TA–W–51,871
is final and not subject to judicial
review. Therefore, the issue before the
USCIT is whether the Department’s
decision to terminate the investigation
for TA–W–53,753 was in error.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Date of
institution
Date of
petition
A careful review of the documents
reveals that both the worker group and
the circumstance of the workers’
separations in TA–W–53,753 and TA–
W–51,871 are the same. Both petitions
were filed on behalf of the same worker
group, 226 employees of Citation
Corporation in Camden, Tennessee and
the same circumstance, the closing of
the plant on December 12, 2002.
Since the same worker group and
circumstance causing the workers’
separation had been investigated and a
final decision denying certification had
been issued in TA–W–51,871, the
termination of the investigation of TA–
W–53,753 was proper in order to
preserve administrative resources.
Petitioners had an opportunity to timely
seek judicial review of TA–W–51,871
and failed to do so. It would be
inappropriate for petitioners to evade
the consequences of their failure timely
seek judicial review by merely filing an
identical petition.
Conclusion
After reconsideration on remand, I
affirm the original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for
adjustment assistance for workers and
former workers of Citation Corporation,
Camden, Tennessee.
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 58 / Monday, March 28, 2005 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of
March 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–1345 Filed 3–25–05; 8:45 am]
Signed in Washington, DC, this 8th day of
March, 2005.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–1349 Filed 3–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–56,449]
Investigations Regarding Certifications
of Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
Fisher Scientific Company, A Division
of Fisher Scientific International, Inc.,
Laboratory Equipment Division,
Indiana, PA; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on February
1, 2005, in response to a petition filed
by a company official on behalf of
workers at Fisher Scientific Company, a
division of Fisher Scientific
International, Inc., Laboratory
Equipment Division, Indiana,
Pennsylvania.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Petitions have been filed with the
Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a)
of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and
are identified in the Appendix to this
notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,
the Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, has
instituted investigations pursuant to
Section 221(a) of the Act.
The purpose of each of the
investigations is to determine whether
the workers are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Title II,
Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations
will further relate, as appropriate, to the
15647
determination of the date on which total
or partial separations began or
threatened to begin and the subdivision
of the firm involved.
The petitioners or any other persons
showing a substantial interest in the
subject matter of the investigations may
request a public hearing, provided such
request is filed in writing with the
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than April 7, 2005.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments regarding the
subject matter of the investigations to
the Director, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, at the address
shown below, not later than April 7,
2005.
The petitions filed in this case are
available for inspection at the Office of
the Director, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room C–5311, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of
March, 2005.
Timothy Sullivan,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
APPENDIX
[Petitions instituted between 02/28/2005 and 03/04/2005]
Subject firm
(petitioners)
Location
Hamilton Sundstrand (Comp) ..........................
Seneca Foods Corp. (Wkrs) ............................
Barnes Supply Co., Inc. (Comp) .....................
Profile Metal Forming (Comp) .........................
Vishay Sprague (Comp) ..................................
Mercury Marine—Brunswick (Wkrs) ................
ECC Corporation (Wkrs) .................................
BASF Corporation Agricultural Products
(Comp).
ICS Cutting Tools (Comp) ...............................
Vernay Laboratories, Inc. (IUECWA) ..............
Pacific Coast Feather Co. (Wkrs) ...................
Healthco International, LLC (Comp) ................
GE Security (Comp) ........................................
Johnston Textiles, Inc. (Wkrs) .........................
Olsonite Corporation (Comp) ..........................
Sohnen Enterprises, Inc. (State) .....................
Osram Sylvania (Comp) ..................................
Casual Lamps (State) ......................................
Aim Nationalease (Comp) ...............................
Industrial Distribution Group (Comp) ...............
Agrium U.S., Inc. (Comp) ................................
Positive Systems, Inc. (Comp) ........................
Carolina Mills, Inc. (NC) ..................................
TSI Logistics (Wkrs) ........................................
Golden Northwest Aluminum (USWA) ............
Keystone Weaving Mills, Inc. (Comp) .............
CTS Wireless Componets (Wkrs) ...................
Continental Tire North America (Wkrs) ...........
Regent Meg Co. (Wkrs) ..................................
Wyeth Pharmaceutical (Wkrs) .........................
Honeywell International, Inc. (Comp) ..............
Grand Junction, CO .........................................
Dayton, WA .....................................................
Collinsville, VA .................................................
Tullahoma, TN .................................................
Sanford, ME .....................................................
Fond du Lac, WI ..............................................
Jefferson, MA ..................................................
Beaumont, TX ..................................................
02/28/2005
02/28/2005
02/28/2005
02/28/2005
02/28/2005
02/28/2005
02/28/2005
02/28/2005
02/22/2005
02/22/2005
02/24/2005
02/24/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/17/2005
02/02/2005
Casco, WI ........................................................
Yellow Springs, OH .........................................
Henderson, NC ................................................
Dixville Notch, NH ...........................................
Gladewater, TX ................................................
Valley, AL ........................................................
Newnan, GA ....................................................
Santa Fe Spring, CA .......................................
Bangor, ME ......................................................
Gardena, CA ....................................................
Old Fort, NC ....................................................
West Jefferson, NC .........................................
Kenai, AK .........................................................
Whitefish, MT ...................................................
Maiden, NC ......................................................
Stockbridge, GA ..............................................
Goldendale, WA ..............................................
York, PA ..........................................................
Albuquerque, NM .............................................
Akron, OH ........................................................
San Francisco, CA ..........................................
Westchester, PA ..............................................
Lynn Haven, FL ...............................................
03/01/2005
03/01/2005
03/01/2005
03/01/2005
03/02/2005
03/02/2005
03/02/2005
03/02/2005
03/02/2005
03/02/2005
03/02/2005
03/03/2005
03/03/2005
03/03/2005
03/03/2005
03/03/2005
03/03/2005
03/03/2005
03/03/2005
03/03/2005
03/03/2005
03/03/2005
03/03/2005
02/14/2005
02/14/2005
02/21/2005
02/28/2005
02/28/2005
03/01/2005
02/17/2005
02/18/2005
02/17/2005
02/25/2005
02/14/2005
03/03/2005
03/02/2005
03/02/2005
02/14/2005
03/02/2005
03/01/2005
03/01/2005
02/28/2005
02/02/2005
03/01/2005
03/02/2005
02/28/2005
TA–W
56,648
56,649
56,650
56,651
56,652
56,653
56,654
56,655
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
56,656
56,657
56,658
56,659
56,660
56,661
56,662
56,663
56,664
56,665
56,666
56,667
56,668
56,669
56,670
56,671
56,672
56,673
56,674
56,675
56,676
56,677
56,678
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:12 Mar 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
Date of
institution
28MRN1
Date of
petition
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 58 (Monday, March 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15646-15647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-1345]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-53,753]
Citation Corporation, Camden, TN; Notice of Negative
Determination on Reconsideration on Remand
The United States Court of International Trade (USCIT) granted the
Secretary of Labor's motion for a voluntary remand in Former Employees
of Citation Corporation v. Elaine Chao, U.S. Secretary of Labor, Court
No. 04-00198, on February 7, 2005. The Department of Labor (Department)
requested the remand to clarify the basis for its denial of the Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA) petition dated December 9, 2003, filed by
the Tennessee AFL-CIO on behalf of workers of the subject firm.
The Department terminated the investigation of TA-W-53,753 because
no new information or change in circumstance was evident which would
have resulted in the reversal of a previous negative determination
applicable to the same worker group (TA-W-51,871, denied on June 16,
2003). The Notice of Termination was issued on December 11, 2003 and
published in the Federal Register on January 7, 2004 (69 FR 940).
By letter dated February 5, 2004, the union representative
requested administrative review of the Department's action regarding
the subject worker group.
By letter dated March 17, 2004, the Department dismissed the
request for reconsideration. The Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration was issued on March 30, 2004 and published in the
Federal Register on April 6, 2004 (69 FR 18107).
On May 12, 2004, the Plaintiff applied to the USCIT for judicial
review, asserting that the Department's determination regarding
petitioners TA-W-51,871 and TA-W-53,753 were in error.
Petitioners have sixty days from the date the Department's
determination is published in the Federal Register to file for judicial
review. The determination regarding TA-W-51,871 was published in the
Federal Register on July 3, 2003 (68 FR 39976). The period to seek
judicial review of TA-W-51,871 expired on September 1, 2003. Because
the Plaintiff did not file an appeal with the USCIT until May 12, 2004,
the determination regarding TA-W-51,871 is final and not subject to
judicial review. Therefore, the issue before the USCIT is whether the
Department's decision to terminate the investigation for TA-W-53,753
was in error.
A careful review of the documents reveals that both the worker
group and the circumstance of the workers' separations in TA-W-53,753
and TA-W-51,871 are the same. Both petitions were filed on behalf of
the same worker group, 226 employees of Citation Corporation in Camden,
Tennessee and the same circumstance, the closing of the plant on
December 12, 2002.
Since the same worker group and circumstance causing the workers'
separation had been investigated and a final decision denying
certification had been issued in TA-W-51,871, the termination of the
investigation of TA-W-53,753 was proper in order to preserve
administrative resources. Petitioners had an opportunity to timely seek
judicial review of TA-W-51,871 and failed to do so. It would be
inappropriate for petitioners to evade the consequences of their
failure timely seek judicial review by merely filing an identical
petition.
Conclusion
After reconsideration on remand, I affirm the original notice of
negative determination of eligibility to apply for adjustment
assistance for workers and former workers of Citation Corporation,
Camden, Tennessee.
[[Page 15647]]
Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of March 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-1345 Filed 3-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
