Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Eliminate Rule 496 and To Amend the Listed Company Manual Relating to Transfer Agents, 14742-14743 [E5-1254]
Download as PDF
14742
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 23, 2005 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–1256 Filed 3–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–51372; File No. SR–NYSE–
2004–62]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange Inc.; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change To
Eliminate Rule 496 and To Amend the
Listed Company Manual Relating to
Transfer Agents
March 15, 2005.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 notice is hereby given that on
October 29, 2004, the New York Stock
Exchange Inc. (‘‘NYSE’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) and on December 3,
2004, and February 9, 2005, amended
the proposed rule change as described
in items I, II, and III below, which items
have been prepared primarily by the
NYSE. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
parties.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The NYSE proposes to: (i) Eliminate
Rule 496; (ii) amend the Listed
Company Manual (‘‘LCM’’) to remove
references to the current requirement of
Rule 496 that transfer agents for listed
companies maintain an office or an
agent in Manhattan below Chambers
Street; (iii) incorporate in the LCM
certain other requirements currently in
Rule 496; and (iv) codify exceptions to
the transfer agent provisions that the
NYSE has historically applied.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
NYSE included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in item IV below. The NYSE has
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
16:27 Mar 22, 2005
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
The NYSE proposes to eliminate Rule
496 and proposes to amend its LCM to
retain and to continue to impose certain
current significant requirements of Rule
496 with respect to entities acting as
transfer agents for listed companies. The
NYSE believes it is appropriate that the
transfer agent requirements be set forth
solely in the LCM due to the fact that
its rules are generally applicable to
members rather than listed companies.
In addition, the current requirements of
Rule 496 are referred to, and to some
extent, repeated in various sections of
the LCM. Accordingly, the NYSE
believes that the transfer agent
requirements are more properly
contained in the LCM.
Rule 496 requires, among other
things, that transfer agents for listed
companies maintain an office or obtain
an agent located south of Chambers
Street in the Borough of Manhattan, City
of New York, where securities can be
delivered in person for registration of
transfer and can be picked up after
completion of such registration (often
referred to in the industry as a ‘‘drop’’).
The current requirement was
implemented when most securities
traded on the NYSE were held in
certificated form and were settled with
physical delivery. The transfer agents’
presence in lower Manhattan, where the
brokers were also concentrated,
facilitated the speedy settlement of
transactions and processing of securities
transfers. However, most securities are
now held in ‘‘street name’’ at The
Depository Trust Company (‘‘DTC’’), a
securities depository registered as
clearing agency under section 17A of
the Exchange Act,3 and transfers of such
securities occur through automated
book-entry systems at DTC without the
need for transfer of physical certificates.
As a result, very few transfers are
facilitated any longer by the drop in
lower Manhattan. The NYSE believes
that marketplace participants, including
securityholders, would not be harmed
by elimination of the drop requirement
in Rule 496.
Rule 496 also requires transfer agents
to record the transfer of securities
received at the transfer agent’s drop
2 The Commission has modified the text of the
summaries prepared by the NYSE.
3 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b).
12 17
VerDate jul<14>2003
prepared summaries, set forth in
sections (A), (B), and (C) below, of the
most significant aspects of these
statements.2
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
before the close of business on a record
date as being transferred on the record
date in order to establish the transferee’s
rights on the record date. As revised, the
LCM will provide the same protection
for securities mailed by the close of
business on a record date by a registered
clearing agency (i.e., DTC). Because the
vast majority of securities are now held
in ‘‘street name,’’ the NYSE believes that
securityholders will not be
disadvantaged by providing this record
date protection only to registered
clearing agencies.
Rule 496 also requires transfer agents
to meet certain capital and insurance
standards. Currently under the rule,
transfer agents are required to (i) have
capital, surplus (both capital and
earned), undivided profits, and capital
reserves aggregating at least $10,000,000
and (ii) maintain blanket bond
insurance coverage of at least
$25,000,000 to protect securities while
in transit or being processed. The
proposed revisions to the LCM will
retain the capital and insurance
requirements of current Rule 496 and
will codify several long-standing
policies and practices of the NYSE by
providing for the qualification of certain
transfer agents that do not otherwise
meet the capital and insurance
requirements of Rule 496. Accordingly,
the LCM will specify that a bank, trust
company, or other qualified
organization acting as transfer agent
may:
1. Act in a dual capacity as transfer
agent/co-transfer agent and registrar if
(i) a majority of its equity is owned by
an entity that meets the standard capital
requirements, (ii) its parent guarantees
the subsidiary’s performance, and (iii)
the subsidiary maintains the
$25,000,000 blanket bond insurance
coverage or the parent maintains the
coverage for the benefit of the
subsidiary;
2. Act in dual capacity as transfer
agent/co-transfer agent and registrar if it
(i) has capital of at least $2,000,000 and
errors and omissions insurance which,
taken together with its capital, equals at
least $10,000,000 and (ii) maintains the
standard $25,000,000 blanket bond
insurance coverage; or
3. Act as co-transfer agent or coregistrar (but not in a dual capacity) for
securities listed on the NYSE if it has
capital equal to at least $2,000,000
without maintaining the $25,000,000
blanket bond insurance coverage.
Additionally a listed company may
act as its own transfer agent provided
that it complies with all the
requirements applicable to transfer
agents not affiliated with the listed
company apart from the capital and
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 23, 2005 / Notices
insurance requirements. However, a
listed company may not act as sole
registrar for its listed securities unless it
also acts as transfer agent. The NYSE
believes the foregoing exceptions to the
capital and insurance requirements are
policies that have been applied by the
NYSE for many years. The NYSE
believes that these policies are
consistent with the protections provided
to securityholders by the general
standards applicable to transfer agent, as
in each case the listed company must
have at least one transfer agent which
directly or indirectly has the equivalent
of at least $10,000,000 in capital and
$25,000,000 blanket bond insurance
coverage.
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act that requires
rules of an exchange are designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and to perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.4 The NYSE believes that
the proposed rule is consistent with its
obligations under section 6(b)(5) of the
Act because it allows transfer agents
acting for listed companies to provide
for transfers of securities in a more
efficient and cost effective manner by
eliminating the drop office requirement,
which is now obsolete. Furthermore the
proposed rule is consistent because the
remainder of the changes are technical
in nature. Although the capital and
insurance requirements will be removed
from Rule 496 and added to the LCM,
the amount of capital and insurance
required will remain the same.
(B) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
NYSE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will have an
impact on or impose a burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Exchange Act.
(C) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments relating to the
proposed rule change have been
solicited or received. NYSE will notify
the Commission of any written
comments it receives.
1 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:27 Mar 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within thirty-five days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
ninety days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve such proposed
rule change; or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR-NYSE 2004–62 on the
subject line.
14743
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the NYSE or on the NYSE’s
Web site at https://www.nyse.com. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE 2004–62 and should
be submitted on or before April 13,
2005.
For the Commission by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.5
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–1254 Filed 3–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration # 10078 and # 10079]
Nevada Disaster # NV–00001
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This is a notice of an
Administrative declaration of a disaster
for the State of Nevada, dated 03/15/
2005.
Incident: Heavy Rains and Flooding.
Paper Comments
Incident Period: 01/06/2005 through
• Send paper comments in triplicate
01/13/2005.
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Effective Date: 03/15/2005.
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Physical Loan Application Deadline
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
Date: 05/16/2005.
20549–0609.
EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:
All submissions should refer to File
12/15/2005.
Number SR–NYSE 2004–62. This file
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
number should be included on the
applications to: U.S. Small Business
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Administration, Disaster Area Office 1,
Commission process and review your
360 Rainbow Blvd. South 3rd Floor,
comments more efficiently, please use
Niagara Falls, NY 14303.
only one method. The Commission will
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
post all comments on the Commission’s
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
U.S. Small Business Administration,
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
409 3rd Street, Suite 6050, Washington,
submission, all subsequent
DC 20416
amendments, all written statements
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
with respect to the proposed rule
hereby given that as a result of the
change that are filed with the
Administrator’s disaster declaration on
Commission, and all written
03/15/2005, applications for disaster
communications relating to the
loans may be filed at the address listed
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than above or other locally announced
locations.
those that may be withheld from the
The following areas have been
public in accordance with the
determined to be adversely affected by
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
the disaster:
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Primary Counties: Clark
Section, 450 Fifth Street, NW.,
Contiguous Counties:
Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such
5 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
filing also will be available for
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14742-14743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-1254]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-51372; File No. SR-NYSE-2004-62]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange Inc.;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Eliminate Rule 496 and To
Amend the Listed Company Manual Relating to Transfer Agents
March 15, 2005.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on October 29, 2004, the New
York Stock Exchange Inc. (``NYSE'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') and on December 3, 2004, and
February 9, 2005, amended the proposed rule change as described in
items I, II, and III below, which items have been prepared primarily by
the NYSE. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The NYSE proposes to: (i) Eliminate Rule 496; (ii) amend the Listed
Company Manual (``LCM'') to remove references to the current
requirement of Rule 496 that transfer agents for listed companies
maintain an office or an agent in Manhattan below Chambers Street;
(iii) incorporate in the LCM certain other requirements currently in
Rule 496; and (iv) codify exceptions to the transfer agent provisions
that the NYSE has historically applied.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the NYSE included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
item IV below. The NYSE has prepared summaries, set forth in sections
(A), (B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of these
statements.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Commission has modified the text of the summaries
prepared by the NYSE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The NYSE proposes to eliminate Rule 496 and proposes to amend its
LCM to retain and to continue to impose certain current significant
requirements of Rule 496 with respect to entities acting as transfer
agents for listed companies. The NYSE believes it is appropriate that
the transfer agent requirements be set forth solely in the LCM due to
the fact that its rules are generally applicable to members rather than
listed companies. In addition, the current requirements of Rule 496 are
referred to, and to some extent, repeated in various sections of the
LCM. Accordingly, the NYSE believes that the transfer agent
requirements are more properly contained in the LCM.
Rule 496 requires, among other things, that transfer agents for
listed companies maintain an office or obtain an agent located south of
Chambers Street in the Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, where
securities can be delivered in person for registration of transfer and
can be picked up after completion of such registration (often referred
to in the industry as a ``drop''). The current requirement was
implemented when most securities traded on the NYSE were held in
certificated form and were settled with physical delivery. The transfer
agents' presence in lower Manhattan, where the brokers were also
concentrated, facilitated the speedy settlement of transactions and
processing of securities transfers. However, most securities are now
held in ``street name'' at The Depository Trust Company (``DTC''), a
securities depository registered as clearing agency under section 17A
of the Exchange Act,\3\ and transfers of such securities occur through
automated book-entry systems at DTC without the need for transfer of
physical certificates. As a result, very few transfers are facilitated
any longer by the drop in lower Manhattan. The NYSE believes that
marketplace participants, including securityholders, would not be
harmed by elimination of the drop requirement in Rule 496.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 496 also requires transfer agents to record the transfer of
securities received at the transfer agent's drop before the close of
business on a record date as being transferred on the record date in
order to establish the transferee's rights on the record date. As
revised, the LCM will provide the same protection for securities mailed
by the close of business on a record date by a registered clearing
agency (i.e., DTC). Because the vast majority of securities are now
held in ``street name,'' the NYSE believes that securityholders will
not be disadvantaged by providing this record date protection only to
registered clearing agencies.
Rule 496 also requires transfer agents to meet certain capital and
insurance standards. Currently under the rule, transfer agents are
required to (i) have capital, surplus (both capital and earned),
undivided profits, and capital reserves aggregating at least
$10,000,000 and (ii) maintain blanket bond insurance coverage of at
least $25,000,000 to protect securities while in transit or being
processed. The proposed revisions to the LCM will retain the capital
and insurance requirements of current Rule 496 and will codify several
long-standing policies and practices of the NYSE by providing for the
qualification of certain transfer agents that do not otherwise meet the
capital and insurance requirements of Rule 496. Accordingly, the LCM
will specify that a bank, trust company, or other qualified
organization acting as transfer agent may:
1. Act in a dual capacity as transfer agent/co-transfer agent and
registrar if (i) a majority of its equity is owned by an entity that
meets the standard capital requirements, (ii) its parent guarantees the
subsidiary's performance, and (iii) the subsidiary maintains the
$25,000,000 blanket bond insurance coverage or the parent maintains the
coverage for the benefit of the subsidiary;
2. Act in dual capacity as transfer agent/co-transfer agent and
registrar if it (i) has capital of at least $2,000,000 and errors and
omissions insurance which, taken together with its capital, equals at
least $10,000,000 and (ii) maintains the standard $25,000,000 blanket
bond insurance coverage; or
3. Act as co-transfer agent or co-registrar (but not in a dual
capacity) for securities listed on the NYSE if it has capital equal to
at least $2,000,000 without maintaining the $25,000,000 blanket bond
insurance coverage.
Additionally a listed company may act as its own transfer agent
provided that it complies with all the requirements applicable to
transfer agents not affiliated with the listed company apart from the
capital and
[[Page 14743]]
insurance requirements. However, a listed company may not act as sole
registrar for its listed securities unless it also acts as transfer
agent. The NYSE believes the foregoing exceptions to the capital and
insurance requirements are policies that have been applied by the NYSE
for many years. The NYSE believes that these policies are consistent
with the protections provided to securityholders by the general
standards applicable to transfer agent, as in each case the listed
company must have at least one transfer agent which directly or
indirectly has the equivalent of at least $10,000,000 in capital and
$25,000,000 blanket bond insurance coverage.
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act that requires rules of an exchange are
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and to perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a
national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest.\4\ The NYSE believes that the proposed rule is
consistent with its obligations under section 6(b)(5) of the Act
because it allows transfer agents acting for listed companies to
provide for transfers of securities in a more efficient and cost
effective manner by eliminating the drop office requirement, which is
now obsolete. Furthermore the proposed rule is consistent because the
remainder of the changes are technical in nature. Although the capital
and insurance requirements will be removed from Rule 496 and added to
the LCM, the amount of capital and insurance required will remain the
same.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
NYSE does not believe that the proposed rule change will have an
impact on or impose a burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act.
(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments relating to the proposed rule change have been
solicited or received. NYSE will notify the Commission of any written
comments it receives.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within thirty-five days of the date of publication of this notice
in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the
Commission may designate up to ninety days of such date if it finds
such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so
finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents,
the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule change; or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSE 2004-62 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20549-0609.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE 2004-62. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 450 Fifth
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
NYSE or on the NYSE's Web site at https://www.nyse.com. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE 2004-62 and should be
submitted on or before April 13, 2005.
For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-1254 Filed 3-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P