Glenshaw Glass Company Glenshaw, PA; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration, 14483-14484 [E5-1242]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 22, 2005 / Notices
SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on
Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure will
hold a two-day meeting. The meeting
will be open to public observation but
not participation.
DATES:
TIME:
September 29–30, 2005.
8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Eldorado Hotel, 309 West
San Francisco Street, Santa Fe, New
Mexico.
ADDRESSES:
John
K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee
Support Office, Administrative Office of
the United States Courts, Washington,
DC 20544, telephone (202) 502–1820.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: March 15, 2005.
John K. Rabiej,
Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.
[FR Doc. 05–5604 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210–55–M
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–56,114]
Bourns Microelectronics Modules, Inc.,
Formerly Known as Microelectronics
Modules Corporation, a Subsidiary of
Bourns, Inc., New Berlin, WI; Dismissal
of Application for Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
Bourns Microelectronics Modules, Inc.,
formerly known as Microelectronics
Modules Corporation, a subsidiary of
Bourns, Inc., New Berlin, Wisconsin.
The application contained no new
substantial information which would
bear importantly on the Department’s
determination. Therefore, dismissal of
the application was issued.
TA–W–56,114; Bourns Microelectronics
Modules, Inc., formerly known as
Microelectronics Modules Corporation, a
subsidiary of Bourns, Inc., New Berlin,
Wisconsin (March 10, 2005)
Signed at Washington, DC, this 11th day of
March, 2005.
Timothy Sullivan,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–1240 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:26 Mar 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
Carolina who were adversely affected by
increased imports.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–55,520 and TA–W–55,520A are
hereby issued as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–55,520; TA–W–55,520A]
Galey & Lord Industries, Inc. Now
Known as Galey & Lord Industries,
LLC, New York Office New York, New
York; Galey & Lord Industries, Inc.
Now Known As Galey & Lord
Industries, LLC Greensboro Textile
Administration LLC, Greensboro
Office, Greensboro, NC; Amended
Certification Regarding Eligibility To
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the
Department of Labor issued Amended
Certification Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance on September
20, 2004, applicable to workers of Galey
& Lord Industries, Inc., New York, New
York and Galey & Lord Industries, Inc.,
Greensboro Corporate Office,
Greensboro, North Carolina. The notice
was published in the Federal Register
on October 4, 2004 (69 FR 62463).
At the request of a company official,
the Department reviewed the
certification for workers of the subject
firm. The workers are engaged in the
production of cotton fabric.
New information shows that Galey &
Lord Industries, Inc., New York, New
York is now known as Galey & Lord
Industries, LLC, New York Office, New
York, New York and Galey & Lord
Industries, Inc., is now known as Galey
& Lord Industries, LLC, Greensboro
Textile Administration LLC, Greensboro
Office, Greensboro, North Carolina.
Workers separated from employment at
the subject firm had their wages
reported under two separate
unemployment insurance (UI) tax
accounts for Galey & Lord Industries,
LLC, New York Office, New York, New
York and Galey & Lord Industries, LLC,
Greensboro Textile Administration LLC,
Greensboro Office, Greensboro, North
Carolina.
Accordingly, the Department is
amending this certification to properly
reflect this matter.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers of
Galey & Lord Industries, Inc., now
known as Galey & Lord Industries, LLC,
New York Office, New York, New York
and Galey & Lord Industries, Inc., now
known as Galey & Lord Industries, LLC,
Greensboro Textile Administration LLC,
Greensboro Office, Greensboro, North
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14483
All workers of Galey & Lords Industries,
Inc., now known as Galey & Lords Industries,
LLC, New York Office, New York, New York
(TA–W–55,520) and Galey & Lord Industries,
Inc., now known as Galey & Lord Industries,
LLC, Greensboro Textile Administration LLC,
Greensboro Office, Greensboro, North
Carolina (TA–W–55,520A) who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after August 24, 2003,
through September 20, 2006, are eligible to
apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are
also eligible to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC this 9th day of
March 2005.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–1244 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–55,898]
Glenshaw Glass Company Glenshaw,
PA; Notice of Negative Determination
on Reconsideration
On February 1, 2005, the Department
issued an Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration for the workers and
former workers of the subject firm. The
Department’s Notice of determination
was published in the Federal Register
on February 22, 2005 (70 FR 8638).
The Department initially denied
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) to
former workers of Glenshaw Glass
Company, Glenshaw, Pennsylvania
because the ‘‘contributed importantly’’
and shift of production group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(3) of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended, were
not met. The initial investigation
revealed that, during the relevant
period, the subject company did not
import products like or directly
competitive with glass containers and
that the subject company did not shift
production abroad. The survey
conducted by the Department of the
subject company’s major declining
customers for the periods 2002, 2003,
January through September 2003 and
January through September 2004
revealed no direct imports and a
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
14484
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 22, 2005 / Notices
negligible amount of indirect imports
during the surveyed period.
The Department determined that the
predominate cause of workers’
separations at the subject company was
related to the flood that shut down the
subject company’s furnaces beginning
on September 17, 2004.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner inferred that imports
contributed to the closure of the subject
facility.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department requested
additional information from the subject
company, including information which
would enable the Department to
conduct an expanded customer survey.
A careful review of the new
information obtained during the
reconsideration investigation revealed
that the subject company’s production
level increased January through
September 2004 from January through
September 2003 levels, prior to the
flood, and that subject company sales to
customers increased January through
September 2004 from January through
September 2003 levels.
Conclusion
After reconsideration, I affirm the
original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance for
workers and former workers of
Glenshaw Glass Company, Glenshaw,
Pennsylvania.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of
March, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–1242 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Signed at Washington, DC, this 1st day of
March, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–1241 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am]
Signed in Washington, DC, this 9th day of
March 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–1238 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–56,149]
[TA–W–56,634]
Honeywell International,
Transportation Systems/Friction
Materials Division, Cleveland, TN;
Notice of Revised Determination of
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance on Reconsideration
KOPIN Corporation, Taunton, MA;
Notice of Termination of Investigation
The Department issued a Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration for
workers and former workers of the
subject firm on March 1, 2005. The
Notice will soon be published in the
Federal Register.
The petitioner asserts in the request
for reconsideration that the workers of
the subject firm possess skills which are
not easily transferable to other jobs in
the local commuting area.
New information provided by the
company official indicates that the
workers possess skills that are not easily
transferable to other jobs in the local
commuting area and that competitive
conditions within the industry are
adverse.
The Department found during initial
investigation that at least five percent of
the workforce at the subject from is at
least fifty years of age.
Conclusion
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–55,975]
Global Metalform LLC Scranton, PA;
Notice of Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on November
10, 2004 in response to a worker
petition filed by a company official on
behalf of workers at Global MetalForm
LLC, Scranton, Pennsylvania.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:26 Mar 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
After careful review of the additional
facts obtained on reconsideration, I
conclude that the requirements of
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended, have been met for workers at
the subject firm.
In accordance with the provisions of
the Act, I make the following
certification:
All workers of Honeywell International,
Transportation Systems/Friction Material
Division, Cleveland, Tennessee, who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after December 3, 2003
through December 20, 2006, are eligible to
apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are
also eligible to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on February
25, 2005 in response to a petition filed
by a company official on behalf of
workers of KOPIN Corporation,
Taunton, Massachusetts.
The petition regarding the
investigation has been deemed invalid.
Consequently, the investigation has
been terminated. Moreover, the
petitioner has been contacted. A new
petition was submitted recently and
shall be instituted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of
March, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–1237 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–55,748]
Liz Claiborne, Inc., North Bergen, NJ;
Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application of December 10, 2004,
a representative of the New York
Metropolitan Area Joint Board, UNITE
HERE requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s negative determination
regarding workers’ eligibility to apply
for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
and Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA), applicable to
workers of the subject firm. The
Department’s negative determination
was issued on November 9, 2004.
The Notice of determination was
published in the Federal Register on
December 9, 2004 (69 FR 71429).
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14483-14484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-1242]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-55,898]
Glenshaw Glass Company Glenshaw, PA; Notice of Negative
Determination on Reconsideration
On February 1, 2005, the Department issued an Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers
and former workers of the subject firm. The Department's Notice of
determination was published in the Federal Register on February 22,
2005 (70 FR 8638).
The Department initially denied Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
to former workers of Glenshaw Glass Company, Glenshaw, Pennsylvania
because the ``contributed importantly'' and shift of production group
eligibility requirements of Section 222(3) of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended, were not met. The initial investigation revealed that, during
the relevant period, the subject company did not import products like
or directly competitive with glass containers and that the subject
company did not shift production abroad. The survey conducted by the
Department of the subject company's major declining customers for the
periods 2002, 2003, January through September 2003 and January through
September 2004 revealed no direct imports and a
[[Page 14484]]
negligible amount of indirect imports during the surveyed period.
The Department determined that the predominate cause of workers'
separations at the subject company was related to the flood that shut
down the subject company's furnaces beginning on September 17, 2004.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner inferred that
imports contributed to the closure of the subject facility.
During the reconsideration investigation, the Department requested
additional information from the subject company, including information
which would enable the Department to conduct an expanded customer
survey.
A careful review of the new information obtained during the
reconsideration investigation revealed that the subject company's
production level increased January through September 2004 from January
through September 2003 levels, prior to the flood, and that subject
company sales to customers increased January through September 2004
from January through September 2003 levels.
Conclusion
After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance
for workers and former workers of Glenshaw Glass Company, Glenshaw,
Pennsylvania.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of March, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-1242 Filed 3-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
