Glenshaw Glass Company Glenshaw, PA; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration, 14483-14484 [E5-1242]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 22, 2005 / Notices SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure will hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation. DATES: TIME: September 29–30, 2005. 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eldorado Hotel, 309 West San Francisco Street, Santa Fe, New Mexico. ADDRESSES: John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502–1820. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dated: March 15, 2005. John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee Support Office. [FR Doc. 05–5604 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 2210–55–M DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–56,114] Bourns Microelectronics Modules, Inc., Formerly Known as Microelectronics Modules Corporation, a Subsidiary of Bourns, Inc., New Berlin, WI; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Bourns Microelectronics Modules, Inc., formerly known as Microelectronics Modules Corporation, a subsidiary of Bourns, Inc., New Berlin, Wisconsin. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department’s determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued. TA–W–56,114; Bourns Microelectronics Modules, Inc., formerly known as Microelectronics Modules Corporation, a subsidiary of Bourns, Inc., New Berlin, Wisconsin (March 10, 2005) Signed at Washington, DC, this 11th day of March, 2005. Timothy Sullivan, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–1240 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P VerDate jul<14>2003 15:26 Mar 21, 2005 Jkt 205001 Carolina who were adversely affected by increased imports. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–55,520 and TA–W–55,520A are hereby issued as follows: DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–55,520; TA–W–55,520A] Galey & Lord Industries, Inc. Now Known as Galey & Lord Industries, LLC, New York Office New York, New York; Galey & Lord Industries, Inc. Now Known As Galey & Lord Industries, LLC Greensboro Textile Administration LLC, Greensboro Office, Greensboro, NC; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor issued Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on September 20, 2004, applicable to workers of Galey & Lord Industries, Inc., New York, New York and Galey & Lord Industries, Inc., Greensboro Corporate Office, Greensboro, North Carolina. The notice was published in the Federal Register on October 4, 2004 (69 FR 62463). At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of cotton fabric. New information shows that Galey & Lord Industries, Inc., New York, New York is now known as Galey & Lord Industries, LLC, New York Office, New York, New York and Galey & Lord Industries, Inc., is now known as Galey & Lord Industries, LLC, Greensboro Textile Administration LLC, Greensboro Office, Greensboro, North Carolina. Workers separated from employment at the subject firm had their wages reported under two separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax accounts for Galey & Lord Industries, LLC, New York Office, New York, New York and Galey & Lord Industries, LLC, Greensboro Textile Administration LLC, Greensboro Office, Greensboro, North Carolina. Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to properly reflect this matter. The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers of Galey & Lord Industries, Inc., now known as Galey & Lord Industries, LLC, New York Office, New York, New York and Galey & Lord Industries, Inc., now known as Galey & Lord Industries, LLC, Greensboro Textile Administration LLC, Greensboro Office, Greensboro, North PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 14483 All workers of Galey & Lords Industries, Inc., now known as Galey & Lords Industries, LLC, New York Office, New York, New York (TA–W–55,520) and Galey & Lord Industries, Inc., now known as Galey & Lord Industries, LLC, Greensboro Textile Administration LLC, Greensboro Office, Greensboro, North Carolina (TA–W–55,520A) who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after August 24, 2003, through September 20, 2006, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed at Washington, DC this 9th day of March 2005. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–1244 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–55,898] Glenshaw Glass Company Glenshaw, PA; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration On February 1, 2005, the Department issued an Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers and former workers of the subject firm. The Department’s Notice of determination was published in the Federal Register on February 22, 2005 (70 FR 8638). The Department initially denied Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) to former workers of Glenshaw Glass Company, Glenshaw, Pennsylvania because the ‘‘contributed importantly’’ and shift of production group eligibility requirements of Section 222(3) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, were not met. The initial investigation revealed that, during the relevant period, the subject company did not import products like or directly competitive with glass containers and that the subject company did not shift production abroad. The survey conducted by the Department of the subject company’s major declining customers for the periods 2002, 2003, January through September 2003 and January through September 2004 revealed no direct imports and a E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1 14484 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 22, 2005 / Notices negligible amount of indirect imports during the surveyed period. The Department determined that the predominate cause of workers’ separations at the subject company was related to the flood that shut down the subject company’s furnaces beginning on September 17, 2004. In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner inferred that imports contributed to the closure of the subject facility. During the reconsideration investigation, the Department requested additional information from the subject company, including information which would enable the Department to conduct an expanded customer survey. A careful review of the new information obtained during the reconsideration investigation revealed that the subject company’s production level increased January through September 2004 from January through September 2003 levels, prior to the flood, and that subject company sales to customers increased January through September 2004 from January through September 2003 levels. Conclusion After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance for workers and former workers of Glenshaw Glass Company, Glenshaw, Pennsylvania. Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of March, 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–1242 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P Signed at Washington, DC, this 1st day of March, 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–1241 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am] Signed in Washington, DC, this 9th day of March 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–1238 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–56,149] [TA–W–56,634] Honeywell International, Transportation Systems/Friction Materials Division, Cleveland, TN; Notice of Revised Determination of Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on Reconsideration KOPIN Corporation, Taunton, MA; Notice of Termination of Investigation The Department issued a Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for workers and former workers of the subject firm on March 1, 2005. The Notice will soon be published in the Federal Register. The petitioner asserts in the request for reconsideration that the workers of the subject firm possess skills which are not easily transferable to other jobs in the local commuting area. New information provided by the company official indicates that the workers possess skills that are not easily transferable to other jobs in the local commuting area and that competitive conditions within the industry are adverse. The Department found during initial investigation that at least five percent of the workforce at the subject from is at least fifty years of age. Conclusion DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–55,975] Global Metalform LLC Scranton, PA; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 10, 2004 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Global MetalForm LLC, Scranton, Pennsylvania. The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. VerDate jul<14>2003 15:26 Mar 21, 2005 Jkt 205001 After careful review of the additional facts obtained on reconsideration, I conclude that the requirements of Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, have been met for workers at the subject firm. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following certification: All workers of Honeywell International, Transportation Systems/Friction Material Division, Cleveland, Tennessee, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after December 3, 2003 through December 20, 2006, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 25, 2005 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of KOPIN Corporation, Taunton, Massachusetts. The petition regarding the investigation has been deemed invalid. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. Moreover, the petitioner has been contacted. A new petition was submitted recently and shall be instituted. Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of March, 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–1237 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–55,748] Liz Claiborne, Inc., North Bergen, NJ; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application of December 10, 2004, a representative of the New York Metropolitan Area Joint Board, UNITE HERE requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor’s negative determination regarding workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA), applicable to workers of the subject firm. The Department’s negative determination was issued on November 9, 2004. The Notice of determination was published in the Federal Register on December 9, 2004 (69 FR 71429). E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14483-14484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-1242]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-55,898]


Glenshaw Glass Company Glenshaw, PA; Notice of Negative 
Determination on Reconsideration

    On February 1, 2005, the Department issued an Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers 
and former workers of the subject firm. The Department's Notice of 
determination was published in the Federal Register on February 22, 
2005 (70 FR 8638).
    The Department initially denied Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 
to former workers of Glenshaw Glass Company, Glenshaw, Pennsylvania 
because the ``contributed importantly'' and shift of production group 
eligibility requirements of Section 222(3) of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended, were not met. The initial investigation revealed that, during 
the relevant period, the subject company did not import products like 
or directly competitive with glass containers and that the subject 
company did not shift production abroad. The survey conducted by the 
Department of the subject company's major declining customers for the 
periods 2002, 2003, January through September 2003 and January through 
September 2004 revealed no direct imports and a

[[Page 14484]]

negligible amount of indirect imports during the surveyed period.
    The Department determined that the predominate cause of workers' 
separations at the subject company was related to the flood that shut 
down the subject company's furnaces beginning on September 17, 2004.
    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner inferred that 
imports contributed to the closure of the subject facility.
    During the reconsideration investigation, the Department requested 
additional information from the subject company, including information 
which would enable the Department to conduct an expanded customer 
survey.
    A careful review of the new information obtained during the 
reconsideration investigation revealed that the subject company's 
production level increased January through September 2004 from January 
through September 2003 levels, prior to the flood, and that subject 
company sales to customers increased January through September 2004 
from January through September 2003 levels.

Conclusion

    After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative 
determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance 
for workers and former workers of Glenshaw Glass Company, Glenshaw, 
Pennsylvania.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of March, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-1242 Filed 3-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P