Grant of Application of American Suzuki Motorcycle Corporation for Renewals of Temporary Exemptions From Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 123, 14491-14492 [05-5579]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 22, 2005 / Notices
As we explained in our Federal
Register notice of January 13, 2005, we
are using a private contractor to assist us
in administering the process for
determining eligibility to participate in
the demonstration project. The
contractor is CPS Human Resource
Services (CPS). CPS has established an
informational Web site at https://
www.cps.ca.gov/tlc/ssa/about.asp that
provides general information on
eligibility requirements, the application
process, and deadlines. CPS has also
established a site for taking applications
at https://www.cps.ca.gov/tlc/ssa/
signin.asp. CPS can be reached by:
• Mail, sent to: CPS Human Resource
Services, SSA Non-Attorney
Representative Demonstration Project,
241 Lathrop Way, Suite A, Sacramento,
CA 95815–4242.
• E-mail, sent to SSA@cps.ca.gov.
• Telephone, toll free at 1–800–376–
5728. The local number in Sacramento
is 916–263–3600.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 96.001, Social SecurityDisability Insurance; 96.002, Social SecurityRetirement Insurance; 96.004, Social
Security-Survivors Insurance; and 96.006,
Supplemental Security Income)
Fritz Streckewald,
Assistant Deputy Commissioner for Program
Policy, for Disability and Income Security
Programs.
[FR Doc. 05–5581 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
2797b(e)) that it was essential to the
national security of the United States to
waive for a period of six months the
import sanction described in Section
73(a)(2)(C) of the Arms Export Control
Act (22 U.S.C. 2797b(a)(2)(C)) against
the activities of the Chinese Government
described in section 74(a)(8)(B) of the
Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C.
2797c(a)(8)(B))—i.e., activities of the
Chinese government relating to the
development or production of any
missile equipment or technology and
activities of the Chinese government
affecting the development or production
of electronics, space systems or
equipment, and military aircraft (see
Federal Register Vol. 68, no. 182,
Friday, Sept. 19, 2003). This action was
effective on September 18, 2004.
On March 17, 2005, a determination
was made pursuant to section 73(e) of
the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C.
2797b(e)) that it is essential to the
national security of the United States to
extend the waiver period for an
additional six months, effective from the
date of expiration of the previous waiver
(March 18, 2005).
These measures shall be implemented
by the responsible agencies as provided
in Executive Order 12851 of June 11,
1993.
Dated: March 18, 2005.
Mark T. Fitzpatrick,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Acting , Bureau
of Nonproliferation, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05–5738 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–27–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5032]
Bureau of Nonproliferation; Extension
of Waiver of Missile Proliferation
Sanctions Against Chinese
Government Activities
Department of State.
ACTION: Notice.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA 2004–18745]
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: A determination has been
made to extend the waiver of import
sanctions against certain activities of the
Chinese Government that was
announced on September 19, 2003,
pursuant to the Arms Export Control
Act, as amended.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 18, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vann H. Van Diepen, Office of
Chemical, Biological and Missile
Nonproliferation, Bureau of
Nonproliferation, Department of State
((202) 647–1142).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A
determination was made on September
9, 2004, pursuant to section 73(e) of the
Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:26 Mar 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
Grant of Application of American
Suzuki Motorcycle Corporation for
Renewals of Temporary Exemptions
From Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard No. 123
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Grant of application for
renewals of temporary exemptions from
a Federal motor vehicle safety standard.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice grants the
application by a motorcycle
manufacturer, American Suzuki
Motorcycle Corporation (Suzuki) for
renewals of temporary exemptions from
a provision in the Federal motor vehicle
safety standard on motorcycle controls
and displays specifying that a
motorcycle rear brake, if provided, must
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14491
be controlled by a right foot control. We
are permitting Suzuki to use the left
handlebar as an alternative location for
the rear brake control. Suzuki has
asserted that ‘‘compliance with the
standard would prevent the
manufacturer from selling a motor
vehicle with an overall level of safety at
least equal to the overall safety level of
nonexempt vehicles.’’
DATES: The grant of the application for
renewals of temporary exemption
expires December 31, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
non-legal issues, you may contact Mr.
Michael Pyne, Office of Crash
Avoidance Standards at (202) 366–4171.
His FAX number is: (202) 493–2739.
For legal issues, you may contact Ms.
Dorothy Nakama, Office of the Chief
Counsel at (202) 366–2992. Her FAX
number is: (202) 366–3820.
You may send mail to these officials
at: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 400 Seventh St., SW.,
Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
49 U.S.C. Section 30113(b) provides
the Secretary of Transportation the
authority to exempt, on a temporary
basis, motor vehicles from a motor
vehicle safety standard under certain
circumstances. The exemption may be
renewed, if the vehicle manufacturer
reapplies. The Secretary has delegated
the authority for Section 30113(b) to
NHTSA.
NHTSA has established regulations at
49 CFR Part 555, Temporary Exemption
from Motor Vehicle Safety and Bumper
Standards. Part 555 provides a means
by which motor vehicle manufacturers
may apply for temporary exemptions
from the Federal motor vehicle safety
standards on the basis of substantial
economic hardship, facilitation of the
development of new motor vehicle
safety or low-emission engine features,
or existence of an equivalent overall
level of motor vehicle safety.
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) No. 123, Motorcycle
controls and displays (49 CFR 571.123)
specifies requirements for the location,
operation, identification, and
illumination of motorcycle controls and
displays, and requirements for
motorcycle stands and footrests. Among
other requirements, FMVSS No. 123
specifies that for motorcycles with rear
wheel brakes, the rear wheel brakes
must be operable through the right foot
control, although the left handlebar is
permissible for motor-driven cycles (See
S5.2.1, and Table 1, Item 11). Motordriven cycles are motorcycles with
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
14492
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 22, 2005 / Notices
motors that produce 5 brake horsepower
or less (See 49 CFR 571.3, Definitions).
On November 21, 2003, NHTSA
published in the Federal Register (68
FR 65667) a notice proposing two
regulatory alternatives to amend FMVSS
No. 123. Each alternative would require
that for certain motorcycles without a
clutch control lever, the rear brakes
must be controlled by a lever located on
the left handlebar. We also requested
comment on industry practices and
plans regarding controls for motorcycles
with integrated brakes. If this proposed
rule is made final, the left handlebar
would be permitted as an alternative
location for the rear brake control.
II. Applications for Renewals of
Temporary Exemptions From FMVSS
No. 123
NHTSA has received applications for
renewals of temporary exemption from
S5.2.1 and Table 1, Item 11 from
American Suzuki Motorcycle
Corporation (Suzuki), a motorcycle
manufacturer. Suzuki asks for
extensions of existing temporary
exemptions for the Burgman 400 (also
known as the AN 400)(for Model Years
(MYs) 2005 and 2006), and the Burgman
650 (also known as the AN 650)(for MYs
2005 and 2006). Both the Burgman 400
and Burgman 650 motorcycles are
considered ‘‘motor scooters.’’
The safety issues are identical in the
case of both of these motorcycles.
Suzuki has applied to use the left
handlebar as the location for the rear
brake control on its motorcycles whose
engines produce more than 5 brake
horsepower (both the Burgman 400 and
the Burgman 650). The frames of each
of the motorcycles have not been
designed to mount a right foot operated
brake pedal (i.e., these motor scooters
have a platform for the feet and operate
only through hand controls). Applying
considerable stress to this sensitive
pressure point of the motor scooter
frame by putting on a foot operated
brake control could cause failure due to
fatigue, unless proper design and testing
procedures are performed.
III. Why Suzuki Claims the Overall
Level of Safety of the Motorcycles
Equals or Exceeds That of
Nonexempted Motorcycles
Suzuki has argued that the overall
level of safety of the motorcycles
covered by its petitions equals or
exceeds that of a nonexempted
motorcycle for the following reasons.
Suzuki has stated that the Burgman
scooters are equipped with automatic
transmissions. As there is no footoperated gear change, the operation and
use of a motorcycle with an automatic
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:26 Mar 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
transmission is similar to the operation
and use of a bicycle, and the vehicles
can be operated without requiring
special training or practice.
Suzuki provided test data with its
October 4, 2002 original temporary
exemption petition showing that the
Burgman 400 ‘‘can easily meet’’ the
braking performance requirements in
FMVSS No. 122, Motorcycle brake
systems. Suzuki provided similar test
data with its June 2, 2002 original
temporary exemption petition for the
Burgman 650, which also showed that
the Burgman 650 ‘‘can easily meet
FMVSS No. 122.’’
Suzuki further stated that it will not
sell more than 2,500 exempted vehicles
in the U.S. in any 12-month period for
which an exemption may be granted. At
the end of the exemption period, Suzuki
stated that it does not intend to comply
with the rear brake control requirements
of FMVSS No. 123. Under previously
granted exemptions, Suzuki sold
approximately 2,702 Burgman 400
scooters and approximately 2, 947
Burgman 650 scooters over a two-year
period.
IV. Why Suzuki Claims an Exemption
Would Be in the Public Interest and
Would Be Consistent With the
Objectives of Motor Vehicle Safety
Suzuki offered the following reason
why another temporary exemption for
its motorcycles would be in the public
interest and would be consistent with
the objectives of motor vehicle safety.
Suzuki asserted that the level of safety
of the Burgman scooters is ‘‘at least
equal to similar vehicles that are
certified to FMVSS No. 123.’’ Suzuki
further asserted that scooters like the
Burgman 400 and Burgman 650 are of
interest to the public, evidenced by the
number of companies that have
previously requested exemptions to sell
similar products in the U.S., the
favorable public comment on the
exemption requests, and the number of
scooters sold under the granted
exemptions.
V. Notification of Receipt of
Applications and Public Comments
On December 3, 2004 (69 FR 70304)
[Docket No. NHTSA–2004–18745], we
published a Federal Register notice
announcing the receipt of applications
for renewals of exemptions from Suzuki.
We published Suzuki’s reasons why the
overall safety of the motorcycles equals
or exceeds that of nonexempted
motorcycles, and why Suzuki claimed
an exemption would be in the public
interest and would be consistent with
the objectives of motor vehicle safety.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
We asked for public comment on
Suzuki’s application.
We received no comments in response
to the December 3, 2004 document.
VI. NHTSA’s Decisions on the
Applications
It is evident that, unless Standard No.
123 is amended to permit or require the
left handlebar brake control on motor
scooters with more than 5 hp, Suzuki
will be unable to sell its motorcycles if
it does not receive a temporary
exemption from the requirement that
the right foot pedal operate the brake
control. It is also evident from the
previous grants of similar petitions that
we have repeatedly found that the
motorcycles exempted from the brake
control location requirement of
Standard No. 123 have an overall level
of safety at least equal to that of
nonexempted motorcycles.
In consideration of the foregoing, we
hereby find that Suzuki has met its
burden of persuasion that to require
compliance with Standard No. 123
would prevent Suzuki from selling a
motor vehicle with an overall level of
safety at least equal to the overall safety
level of nonexempt vehicles. We further
find that a temporary exemption is in
the public interest and consistent with
the objectives of motor vehicle safety.
Therefore:
1. NHTSA Temporary Exemption No.
EX02–3, exempting American Suzuki
Motorcycle Corporation from the
requirements of item 11, column 2, table
1 of 49 CFR 571.123 Standard No. 123
Motorcycle Controls and Displays, that
the rear wheel brakes be operable
through the right foot control, is hereby
extended to expire on December 31,
2007. This exemption applies only to
the Burgman 400 (also known as the AN
400).
2. NHTSA Temporary Exemption No.
EX02–2 exempting American Suzuki
Motorcycle Corporation from the
requirements of item 11, column 2, table
1 of 49 CFR 571.123 Standard No. 123
Motorcycle Controls and Displays, that
the rear wheel brakes be operable
through the right foot control, is hereby
extended to expire on December 31,
2007. This exemption applies only to
the Burgman 650 (also known as the AN
650).
Authority: 49 U.S.C. Section 30113;
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and
501.4.
Issued on: March 16, 2005.
Jeffrey W. Runge,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05–5579 Filed 3–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14491-14492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-5579]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA 2004-18745]
Grant of Application of American Suzuki Motorcycle Corporation
for Renewals of Temporary Exemptions From Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard No. 123
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Grant of application for renewals of temporary exemptions from
a Federal motor vehicle safety standard.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice grants the application by a motorcycle
manufacturer, American Suzuki Motorcycle Corporation (Suzuki) for
renewals of temporary exemptions from a provision in the Federal motor
vehicle safety standard on motorcycle controls and displays specifying
that a motorcycle rear brake, if provided, must be controlled by a
right foot control. We are permitting Suzuki to use the left handlebar
as an alternative location for the rear brake control. Suzuki has
asserted that ``compliance with the standard would prevent the
manufacturer from selling a motor vehicle with an overall level of
safety at least equal to the overall safety level of nonexempt
vehicles.''
DATES: The grant of the application for renewals of temporary exemption
expires December 31, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For non-legal issues, you may contact
Mr. Michael Pyne, Office of Crash Avoidance Standards at (202) 366-
4171. His FAX number is: (202) 493-2739.
For legal issues, you may contact Ms. Dorothy Nakama, Office of the
Chief Counsel at (202) 366-2992. Her FAX number is: (202) 366-3820.
You may send mail to these officials at: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 400 Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
49 U.S.C. Section 30113(b) provides the Secretary of Transportation
the authority to exempt, on a temporary basis, motor vehicles from a
motor vehicle safety standard under certain circumstances. The
exemption may be renewed, if the vehicle manufacturer reapplies. The
Secretary has delegated the authority for Section 30113(b) to NHTSA.
NHTSA has established regulations at 49 CFR Part 555, Temporary
Exemption from Motor Vehicle Safety and Bumper Standards. Part 555
provides a means by which motor vehicle manufacturers may apply for
temporary exemptions from the Federal motor vehicle safety standards on
the basis of substantial economic hardship, facilitation of the
development of new motor vehicle safety or low-emission engine
features, or existence of an equivalent overall level of motor vehicle
safety.
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 123, Motorcycle
controls and displays (49 CFR 571.123) specifies requirements for the
location, operation, identification, and illumination of motorcycle
controls and displays, and requirements for motorcycle stands and
footrests. Among other requirements, FMVSS No. 123 specifies that for
motorcycles with rear wheel brakes, the rear wheel brakes must be
operable through the right foot control, although the left handlebar is
permissible for motor-driven cycles (See S5.2.1, and Table 1, Item 11).
Motor-driven cycles are motorcycles with
[[Page 14492]]
motors that produce 5 brake horsepower or less (See 49 CFR 571.3,
Definitions).
On November 21, 2003, NHTSA published in the Federal Register (68
FR 65667) a notice proposing two regulatory alternatives to amend FMVSS
No. 123. Each alternative would require that for certain motorcycles
without a clutch control lever, the rear brakes must be controlled by a
lever located on the left handlebar. We also requested comment on
industry practices and plans regarding controls for motorcycles with
integrated brakes. If this proposed rule is made final, the left
handlebar would be permitted as an alternative location for the rear
brake control.
II. Applications for Renewals of Temporary Exemptions From FMVSS No.
123
NHTSA has received applications for renewals of temporary exemption
from S5.2.1 and Table 1, Item 11 from American Suzuki Motorcycle
Corporation (Suzuki), a motorcycle manufacturer. Suzuki asks for
extensions of existing temporary exemptions for the Burgman 400 (also
known as the AN 400)(for Model Years (MYs) 2005 and 2006), and the
Burgman 650 (also known as the AN 650)(for MYs 2005 and 2006). Both the
Burgman 400 and Burgman 650 motorcycles are considered ``motor
scooters.''
The safety issues are identical in the case of both of these
motorcycles. Suzuki has applied to use the left handlebar as the
location for the rear brake control on its motorcycles whose engines
produce more than 5 brake horsepower (both the Burgman 400 and the
Burgman 650). The frames of each of the motorcycles have not been
designed to mount a right foot operated brake pedal (i.e., these motor
scooters have a platform for the feet and operate only through hand
controls). Applying considerable stress to this sensitive pressure
point of the motor scooter frame by putting on a foot operated brake
control could cause failure due to fatigue, unless proper design and
testing procedures are performed.
III. Why Suzuki Claims the Overall Level of Safety of the Motorcycles
Equals or Exceeds That of Nonexempted Motorcycles
Suzuki has argued that the overall level of safety of the
motorcycles covered by its petitions equals or exceeds that of a
nonexempted motorcycle for the following reasons. Suzuki has stated
that the Burgman scooters are equipped with automatic transmissions. As
there is no foot-operated gear change, the operation and use of a
motorcycle with an automatic transmission is similar to the operation
and use of a bicycle, and the vehicles can be operated without
requiring special training or practice.
Suzuki provided test data with its October 4, 2002 original
temporary exemption petition showing that the Burgman 400 ``can easily
meet'' the braking performance requirements in FMVSS No. 122,
Motorcycle brake systems. Suzuki provided similar test data with its
June 2, 2002 original temporary exemption petition for the Burgman 650,
which also showed that the Burgman 650 ``can easily meet FMVSS No.
122.''
Suzuki further stated that it will not sell more than 2,500
exempted vehicles in the U.S. in any 12-month period for which an
exemption may be granted. At the end of the exemption period, Suzuki
stated that it does not intend to comply with the rear brake control
requirements of FMVSS No. 123. Under previously granted exemptions,
Suzuki sold approximately 2,702 Burgman 400 scooters and approximately
2, 947 Burgman 650 scooters over a two-year period.
IV. Why Suzuki Claims an Exemption Would Be in the Public Interest and
Would Be Consistent With the Objectives of Motor Vehicle Safety
Suzuki offered the following reason why another temporary exemption
for its motorcycles would be in the public interest and would be
consistent with the objectives of motor vehicle safety. Suzuki asserted
that the level of safety of the Burgman scooters is ``at least equal to
similar vehicles that are certified to FMVSS No. 123.'' Suzuki further
asserted that scooters like the Burgman 400 and Burgman 650 are of
interest to the public, evidenced by the number of companies that have
previously requested exemptions to sell similar products in the U.S.,
the favorable public comment on the exemption requests, and the number
of scooters sold under the granted exemptions.
V. Notification of Receipt of Applications and Public Comments
On December 3, 2004 (69 FR 70304) [Docket No. NHTSA-2004-18745], we
published a Federal Register notice announcing the receipt of
applications for renewals of exemptions from Suzuki. We published
Suzuki's reasons why the overall safety of the motorcycles equals or
exceeds that of nonexempted motorcycles, and why Suzuki claimed an
exemption would be in the public interest and would be consistent with
the objectives of motor vehicle safety. We asked for public comment on
Suzuki's application.
We received no comments in response to the December 3, 2004
document.
VI. NHTSA's Decisions on the Applications
It is evident that, unless Standard No. 123 is amended to permit or
require the left handlebar brake control on motor scooters with more
than 5 hp, Suzuki will be unable to sell its motorcycles if it does not
receive a temporary exemption from the requirement that the right foot
pedal operate the brake control. It is also evident from the previous
grants of similar petitions that we have repeatedly found that the
motorcycles exempted from the brake control location requirement of
Standard No. 123 have an overall level of safety at least equal to that
of nonexempted motorcycles.
In consideration of the foregoing, we hereby find that Suzuki has
met its burden of persuasion that to require compliance with Standard
No. 123 would prevent Suzuki from selling a motor vehicle with an
overall level of safety at least equal to the overall safety level of
nonexempt vehicles. We further find that a temporary exemption is in
the public interest and consistent with the objectives of motor vehicle
safety. Therefore:
1. NHTSA Temporary Exemption No. EX02-3, exempting American Suzuki
Motorcycle Corporation from the requirements of item 11, column 2,
table 1 of 49 CFR 571.123 Standard No. 123 Motorcycle Controls and
Displays, that the rear wheel brakes be operable through the right foot
control, is hereby extended to expire on December 31, 2007. This
exemption applies only to the Burgman 400 (also known as the AN 400).
2. NHTSA Temporary Exemption No. EX02-2 exempting American Suzuki
Motorcycle Corporation from the requirements of item 11, column 2,
table 1 of 49 CFR 571.123 Standard No. 123 Motorcycle Controls and
Displays, that the rear wheel brakes be operable through the right foot
control, is hereby extended to expire on December 31, 2007. This
exemption applies only to the Burgman 650 (also known as the AN 650).
Authority: 49 U.S.C. Section 30113; delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.50 and 501.4.
Issued on: March 16, 2005.
Jeffrey W. Runge,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05-5579 Filed 3-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P