Notice of Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Small Diameter Circular Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe From Brazil, 13459-13460 [E5-1223]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 53 / Monday, March 21, 2005 / Notices result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent Final Results of Review assessment of doubled antidumping As a result of this review, we find that duties. the following weighted-average This notice also serves as a reminder dumping margins exist for the period to parties subject to administrative August 1, 2002, through July 31, 2003: protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the Margin disposition of proprietary information Manufacturer/exporter (percent) disclosed under APO as explained in the administrative order itself. Timely Dofasco Inc., Sorevco, Inc., Do Sol Galva Ltd. ....................... 2.31 written notification of the return/ Stelco Inc. ................................. 0.02 destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply Duty Assessment and Cash Deposit with the regulations and terms of an Requirements APO is a sanctionable violation. The Department shall determine, and This administrative review and notice Customs and Border Protection (CBP) are in accordance with sections shall assess, antidumping duties on all 751(a)(1)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. appropriate entries. The Department Dated: March 14, 2005. will issue appropriate appraisement instructions directly to CBP within 15 Joseph A. Spetrini days of publication of the final results Acting Assistant Secretary for Import of review. Furthermore, the following Administration. deposit rates will be effective with Appendix—List of Issues respect to all shipments of certain 1. Surface Type Characteristics for Model corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat Match products from Canada entered, or 2. New Assessment Policy for Resellers withdrawn from warehouse, for 3. Treatment of Channel ‘‘2’’ Sales consumption on or after the publication 4. Calculation of CEP Profit date of the final results, as provided for 5. Sales Subject to Review by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 6. Margin Program Adjustments 7. Normal Value Currency Conversion For Dofasco, the cash deposit rate will 8. Identification of DJG in Customs be the rate indicated above; (2) for Instructions Steloco, the rate is de minimis and 9. Inclusion of Importer in Liquidation therefore, there is no cash deposit Instructions requirement; (3) for previously reviewed [FR Doc. E5–1218 Filed 3–18–05; 8:45 am] or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will be the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P company-specific rate established for the most recent period; (4) if the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-thanInternational Trade Administration fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate [A–351–826] will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of Notice of Amended Final Results of the subject merchandise; and (5) for all Antidumping Duty Administrative other producers and/or exporters of this Review: Small Diameter Circular merchandise, the cash deposit rate shall Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel be the ‘‘all other’’ rate established in the Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe LTFV investigation, which is 18.71 From Brazil percent. The deposit rate, when AGENCY: Import Administration, imposed, shall remain in effect until International Trade Administration, publication of the final results of the Department of Commerce. next administrative review. SUMMARY: On February 11, 2005, the Notification of Interested Parties Department of Commerce (‘‘the This notice also serves as a final Department’’) published the final results reminder to importers of their of its administrative review of the responsibility under § 351.402(f)(2) of antidumping duty order on small the Department’s regulations to file a diameter circular seamless carbon and certificate regarding the reimbursement alloy steel standard, line and pressure of antidumping duties prior to pipe from Brazil for the period August liquidation of the relevant entries 1, 2002, through July 31, 2003. See during this review period. Failure to Notice of Final Results of Antidumping comply with this requirement could Duty Administrative Review: Small minimis. We have made no changes to Stelco’s margin for these final results. VerDate jul<14>2003 18:36 Mar 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 13459 Diameter Circular Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from Brazil, 70 FR 7243 (February 11, 2005) (‘‘Final Results’’). We are amending our Final Results to correct ceratin ministerial errors alleged by the respondent V&M do Brasil, S.A. (‘‘VMB’’) pursuant to section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). EFFECTIVE DATE: March 21, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen M. Kramer or Patrick Edwards, AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, at (202) 482–0405 or (202) 482–8029, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Amendment of Final Results On February 11, 2005, the Department published the Final Results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on small diameter circular seamless carbon and alloy steel standard, line and pressure pipe (‘‘seamless line pipe’’) from Brazil. See Final Results. In accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(c)(2), on February 14, 2005, both United States Steel Corporation (‘‘petitioner’’) and VMB timely filed allegations that the Department made ministerial errors in the final results. On February 22, 2005, we received comments from both the petitioner and respondent, rebutting each party’s alleged ministerial errors. In accordance with section 751(h) of the Act, we have determined that certain ministerial errors were made in our Final Results margin calculations. For a detailed discussion of the ministerial error allegations, rebuttals and the Department’s analysis, see Memorandum to Richard O. Weible, Director, through Abdelali Elouaradia, Program Manager, from Helen M. Kramer and Patrick S. Edwards, Case Analysts, regarding ‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Small Diameter Circular Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from Brazil; Alleged Ministerial Errors in the Final Results,’’ dated March 14, 2005, which is on file in the Central Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), room B–099 of the main Department building. In accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), we are amending the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review of seamless line pipe from Brazil to correct these ministerial errors. E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM 21MRN1 13460 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 53 / Monday, March 21, 2005 / Notices The revised weighted-average dumping margin for the period August 1, 2002, through July 31, 2003, are listed below: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–533–842] Revised margin (percent) Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination: Bottle-Grade Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) V&M do Brasil, S.A ....................... 7.96 Resin From India AGENCY: Import Administration, Cash Deposit Rates International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. The following antidumping duty SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce deposits will be required on all (the Department) has reached a final shipments of seamless line pipe determination that countervailable products from Brazil entered, or subsidies are being provided to withdrawn from warehouse, for producers and exporters of Bottle-Grade consumption, effective on or after the (BG) Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) publication date of the amended final Resin from India. For information on the results of this administrative review, as estimated countervailable subsidy rates, provided by section 751(a)(1) of the Act: please see the ‘‘Final Determination’’ (1) The cash deposit rate for the section of this notice. reviewed company will be the rate EFFECTIVE DATE: March 21, 2005. listed above; (2) for previously reviewed FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: or investigated companies not listed Douglas Kirby or Addilyn Chamsabove, the cash deposit rate will Eddine, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, continue to be the company-specific rate Import Administration, U.S. Department published for the most recent period; (3) of Commerce, Room 7866, 14th Street if the exporter is not a firm covered in and Constitution Avenue, NW., this review, the previous review, or the Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) original investigation, but the 482–3782 or (202) 482–0648, manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate respectively. will be the rate established for the most SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: recent period for the manufacturer of Case History the merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm On August 30, 2004 the Department covered in this or any previous reviews, published the Notice of Preliminary the cash deposit rate will be 124.94 Affirmative Countervailing Duty percent, the ‘‘All Others’’ rate Determination and Alignment with established in the less-than-fair-value Final Antidumping Duty Determination: investigation. These cash deposit Bottle-Grade Polyethylene requirements shall remain in effect until Terephthalate (PET) Resin from India, publication of the final results of the 69 FR 52866 (August 30, 2004) next administrative review. (Preliminary Determination). Since the issuance of the Preliminary Assessment Rates Determination, the following events have occurred. Between September 9 In accordance with section 19 CFR and November 17, 2004, the Department 356.8(a), the Department will issue issued supplemental questionnaires to appropriate assessment instructions each of the respondent parties and all directly to U.S. Customs and Border parties submitted timely responses to Protection (CBP) on or after 41 days the questionnaires. On September 29, following the publication of these 2004, the United States PET Resin amended final results of review to effect Producers Coalition (Petitioner) the Final Results and these amended requested a hearing pursuant to 19 CFR final results. 351.310(c) and the Department’s We are issuing and publishing these Preliminary Determination. amended final results and notice in From December 2 through December accordance with sections 751(a)(1), 17, 2004, the Department conducted verification of the questionnaire 751(h) and 771(i) of the Act. responses provided by the Government Dated: March 14, 2005. of India (GOI) and the four respondent Joseph A. Spetrini, parties: Reliance Industries, Ltd. Acting Assistant Secretary for Import (Reliance), Futura Polyesters, Ltd. Administration. (Futura), South Asia Pertrochem Ltd. [FR Doc. E5–1223 Filed 3–18–05; 8:45 am] (SAPL), and Elque Polyesters Ltd. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P (Elque). The Department issued the GOI Manufacturer/exporter VerDate jul<14>2003 18:36 Mar 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 and the Reliance Industries Ltd. (Reliance) verification reports on January 25, 2005. See Memoranda to the File, Countervailing Duty Investigation of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Resin from India: Verification of the Government of India’s (GOI) Questionnaire Responses (GOI Verification Report); and Countervailing Duty Investigation of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Resin from India: Verification of Reliance Industries Ltd. (Reliance Verification Report). The Department issued the Elque, Futura, and SAPL verification reports on January 26, 2004. See Memoranda to the File, Countervailing Duty Investigation of PET Resin from India: Verification of Elque Ltd. (Elque Verification Report); Countervailing Duty Investigation of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Resin from India: Verification of Futura Polyesters Ltd. (Futura Verification Report); and Countervailing Duty Investigation of PET Resin from India: Verification of South Asia Petrochem Ltd. (SAPL Verification Report). In addition, on February 14, 2005, the Department issued a memorandum containing our preliminary analysis of the Export Oriented Unit (EOU) programs which we had noted in the Preliminary Determination were programs for which additional information was needed. See Memoranda to the File from Sean Carey, Acting Program Manager, through Dana S. Mermelstein, Acting Director, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 6, to Barbara E. Tillman, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Import Administration, Countervailing Duty Investigation of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Resin from India: Preliminary Analysis of the Export Oriented Unit (EOU) Program on Duty Drawback on Furnace Oil Procured from Domestic Oil Companies Program and Purchases of Materials and Other Inputs Free of Central Excise Duty (EOU Program Memorandum). On February 4, 2005, case briefs were filed by the Petitioner, the GOI, Reliance, and SAPL. On February 9, 2005, the Petitioner, Reliance, and SAPL filed rebuttal briefs. Neither Futura nor Elque filed case or rebuttal briefs. On February 11, 2005, the Petitioner withdrew its request for a hearing. The Department also allowed parties a separate opportunity to file comments and rebuttal comments on our EOU Program Memorandum. On February 17, 2005, such comments were filed by the Petitioner, the GOI, Reliance and SAPL. On February 22, 2005, the Petitioner submitted rebuttal comments. Also, on February 17, 2005, Reliance requested that the Department proceed with a hearing. On February 18, and February E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM 21MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 53 (Monday, March 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13459-13460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-1223]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-351-826]


Notice of Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review: Small Diameter Circular Seamless Carbon and 
Alloy Steel Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe From Brazil

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On February 11, 2005, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published the final results of its administrative review 
of the antidumping duty order on small diameter circular seamless 
carbon and alloy steel standard, line and pressure pipe from Brazil for 
the period August 1, 2002, through July 31, 2003. See Notice of Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Small Diameter 
Circular Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line and Pressure 
Pipe from Brazil, 70 FR 7243 (February 11, 2005) (``Final Results''). 
We are amending our Final Results to correct ceratin ministerial errors 
alleged by the respondent V&M do Brasil, S.A. (``VMB'') pursuant to 
section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'').

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 21, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen M. Kramer or Patrick Edwards, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, at (202) 482-0405 or 
(202) 482-8029, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Amendment of Final Results

    On February 11, 2005, the Department published the Final Results of 
the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on small 
diameter circular seamless carbon and alloy steel standard, line and 
pressure pipe (``seamless line pipe'') from Brazil. See Final Results. 
In accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(c)(2), 
on February 14, 2005, both United States Steel Corporation 
(``petitioner'') and VMB timely filed allegations that the Department 
made ministerial errors in the final results. On February 22, 2005, we 
received comments from both the petitioner and respondent, rebutting 
each party's alleged ministerial errors. In accordance with section 
751(h) of the Act, we have determined that certain ministerial errors 
were made in our Final Results margin calculations. For a detailed 
discussion of the ministerial error allegations, rebuttals and the 
Department's analysis, see Memorandum to Richard O. Weible, Director, 
through Abdelali Elouaradia, Program Manager, from Helen M. Kramer and 
Patrick S. Edwards, Case Analysts, regarding ``Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review of Small Diameter Circular Carbon and Alloy Steel 
Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from Brazil; Alleged Ministerial 
Errors in the Final Results,'' dated March 14, 2005, which is on file 
in the Central Records Unit (``CRU''), room B-099 of the main 
Department building.
    In accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), 
we are amending the final results of the antidumping duty 
administrative review of seamless line pipe from Brazil to correct 
these ministerial errors.

[[Page 13460]]

    The revised weighted-average dumping margin for the period August 
1, 2002, through July 31, 2003, are listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Revised
                    Manufacturer/exporter                        margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
V&M do Brasil, S.A...........................................       7.96
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Rates

    The following antidumping duty deposits will be required on all 
shipments of seamless line pipe products from Brazil entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, effective on or after the 
publication date of the amended final results of this administrative 
review, as provided by section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash 
deposit rate for the reviewed company will be the rate listed above; 
(2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, 
the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate 
published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 
covered in this review, the previous review, or the original 
investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be 
the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of 
the merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer 
is a firm covered in this or any previous reviews, the cash deposit 
rate will be 124.94 percent, the ``All Others'' rate established in the 
less-than-fair-value investigation. These cash deposit requirements 
shall remain in effect until publication of the final results of the 
next administrative review.

Assessment Rates

    In accordance with section 19 CFR 356.8(a), the Department will 
issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection (CBP) on or after 41 days following the publication 
of these amended final results of review to effect the Final Results 
and these amended final results.
    We are issuing and publishing these amended final results and 
notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1), 751(h) and 771(i) of the 
Act.

    Dated: March 14, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E5-1223 Filed 3-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.