Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 Thereto by the New York Stock Exchange, Inc., To Amend Its Original and Continued Quantitative Listing Standards, 12924-12934 [E5-1132]
Download as PDF
12924
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 16, 2005 / Notices
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Section, 450 Fifth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of NASD. All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
publicly available. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–NASD–
2005–026 and should be submitted on
or before April 6, 2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–1129 Filed 3–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–51356; File No. SR–NASD–
2004–159]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Allow
NASD, on a Pilot Basis, To Review
Denial of Access Complaints Related
to the Alternative Display Facility
On October 22, 2004, the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
(‘‘NASD’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:23 Mar 15, 2005
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 In Amendment No. 1, the NASD clarified the
scope of authority it and the Market Regulation
Committee would have to review denials of access.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51092
(January 28, 2005), 70 FR 6061.
5 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
6 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
2 17
March 10, 2005.
9 17
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a
proposed rule change to allow NASD,
on a pilot basis, to review denial of
access complaints related to the
Alternative Display Facility (‘‘ADF’’).
On January 11, 2005, NASD filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change.3 The proposed rule change, as
amended, was published in the Federal
Register on February 4, 2005.4 The
Commission received no comments on
the proposal.
The proposed rule change would
establish on a pilot basis new NASD
Rule 4400A, which would give NASD
the authority to receive and review
complaints against an NASD Market
Participant alleging denial of direct or
indirect access of the NASD Market
Participant’s quotations in the ADF that
the NASD Market Participant is required
to provide pursuant to NASD Rule
4300A. In addition, proposed NASD
Rule 4400A would set forth procedures
for reviewing such complaints and
would delegate authority to NASD’s
Market Regulation Committee to review
denial of access determinations
rendered in accordance with Rule
4400A.
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change, as amended, is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national
securities association.5 In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
15A(b)(6) of the Act,6 which requires,
among other things, that the rules of an
association be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
New NASD 4400A affords some due
process to a party claiming that an
NASD Market Participant quoting ADF
has denied it access to the NASD Market
Participant’s system. Establishing such a
process should help deter improper
denials of access. The Commission
believes that it is reasonable and
consistent with the Act for NASD to
deter such denials by requiring an
NASD Market Participant to respond to
a complaint in the manner set forth in
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the new rule. Furthermore, where such
deterrence is not effective, NASD will
have the authority to direct the NASD
Market Participant to restore the
complainant’s access promptly, which
should help minimize any market
disruption caused by an improper
denial of access.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
section 19(b)(2) of the Act,7 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NASD–2004–
159), as amended, be hereby approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.8
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–1157 Filed 3–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–51322, File No. SR–NYSE–
2004–20]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice
of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and
7 Thereto by the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc., To Amend Its Original
and Continued Quantitative Listing
Standards
March 8, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 13,
2004, the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
On May 20, 2004, NYSE submitted
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change.3 The proposed rule change, as
amended, was published for comment
in the Federal Register on July 2, 2004.4
On August 31, 2004, NYSE submitted
Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule
change.5 On November 29, 2004, NYSE
submitted Amendment No. 3 to the
proposed rule change.6 On December
7 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Amendment No. 1 replaced and superseded the
original filing in its entirety.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49917
(June 25, 2004), 69 FR 40439.
5 Amendment No. 2 replaced and superseded the
original filing in its entirety.
6 Amendment No. 3 replaced and superseded the
original filing in its entirety.
8 17
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 16, 2005 / Notices
17, 2004, NYSE withdrew Amendment
No. 3. On December 17, 2004, NYSE
submitted Amendment No. 4 to the
proposed rule change.7 On January 25,
2005, NYSE submitted Amendment No.
5 to the proposed rule change.8 On
February 17, 2005, NYSE submitted
Amendment No. 6 to the proposed rule
change.9 On March 4, 2005, NYSE
submitted Amendment No. 7 to the
proposed rule change.10 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change, as amended, from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The NYSE is proposing to amend
Sections 102.01C, 103.01B, 802.01A,
802.01B, 802.01C, 802.02, and 802.03 of
the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual
regarding the minimum numerical
original and continued listing standards.
Proposed new language is italicized;
deletions are bracketed.11
*
*
*
*
*
102.00
*
Domestic Companies
*
*
*
*
102.01C A company must meet one of
the following financial standards.
(I) Earnings Test
(1) Pre-tax earnings from continuing
operations and after minority interest,
amortization and equity in the earnings
or losses of investees, [as] adjusted [(E)]
for items specified in (2)(a) through
(2)(i) below [(F)] must total at least[.]
[$2,500,000 in the latest fiscal year
together with $2,000,000 in each of the
preceding two years; or $6,500,000]
$10,000,000 in the aggregate for the last
three fiscal years together with a
minimum of $[4,5]2,000,000 in each of
the two most recent fiscal years, and
positive amounts [for] in all [each of the
preceding two] three years.
(2) Adjustments (E)(F) that must be
included in the calculation of the
amounts required in paragraph (1) are as
follows:
7 Amendment No. 4 replaced and superseded the
original filing in its entirety.
8 Amendment No. 5 replaced and superseded the
original filing in its entirety.
9 Amendment No. 6 partially amended Sections
802.01B, 802.02, and 802.03 of the proposed rule
text.
10 Amendment No. 7 partially amended Sections
802.03 of the proposed rule text.
11 NYSE amended the proposed rule change to
make technical corrections to Exhibit 5 of the
proposed rule change. E-mail from Annemarie
Tierney, Assistant General Counsel, and Glenn
Tyranski, Vice President, Financial Compliance,
NYSE, dated February 24, 2005.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:23 Mar 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
(a) Application of Use of Proceeds[.]—
If a company is in registration with the
SEC and is in the process of an equity
offering, adjustments should be made to
reflect the net proceeds of that offering,
and the specified intended
application(s) of such proceeds to:
(i) Pay off existing debt[.]: The
adjustment will include elimination of
the actual historical interest on debt
being retired with offering proceeds of
all relevant periods. If the event giving
rise to the adjustment occurred during
a time-period such that pro forma
amounts are not set forth in the SEC
registration statement (typically, the pro
forma effect of repayment of debt will be
provided in the current registration
statement only with respect to the last
fiscal year plus any interim period in
accordance with SEC rules), the
company must prepare the relevant
adjusted financial data to reflect the
adjustment to its historical financial
data, and its outside audit firm must
provide a report of having applied
agreed-upon procedures with respect to
such adjustments. Such report must be
prepared in accordance with the
standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public
Accountants.
(ii) Fund an acquisition:
(1) The adjustments will include
those applicable with respect to
acquisition(s) to be funded with the
proceeds. Adjustments will be made
that are disclosed as such in accordance
with Rule 3–05 ‘‘Financial Statements of
Business Acquired or to be Acquired’’
and Article 11 of Regulation S–X.
Adjustments will be made for all the
relevant periods for those acquisitions
for which historical financial
information of the acquiree is required
to be disclosed in the SEC registration
statement; and
(2) Adjustments applicable to any
period for which pro forma numbers are
not set forth in the registration
statement shall be accompanied by the
relevant adjusted financial data to
combine the historical results of the
acquiree (or relevant portion thereof)
and acquiror, as disclosed in the
company’s SEC filing. Under SEC rules,
the number of periods disclosed
depends upon the significance level of
the acquiree to the acquiror. The
adjustments will include those
necessary to reflect (a) the allocation of
the purchase price, including adjusting
assets and liabilities of the acquiree to
fair value recognizing any intangibles
(and associated amortization and
depreciation), and (b) the effects of
additional financing to complete the
acquisition. The company must prepare
the relevant adjusted financial data to
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12925
reflect the adjustment to its historical
financial data, and its outside audit firm
must provide a report of having applied
agreed-upon procedures with respect to
such adjustments. Such report must be
prepared in accordance with the
standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public
Accountants[.];
(b) Acquisitions and Dispositions[:]—
In instances other than acquisitions (and
related dispositions of part of the
acquiree) funded with the use of
proceeds, adjustments will be made for
those acquisitions and dispositions that
are disclosed as such in a company’s
financial statements in accordance with
Rule 3–05 ‘‘Financial Statements of
Business Acquired or to be Acquired’’
and Article 11 of Regulation S–X. If the
disclosure does not specify pre-tax
earnings from continuing operations,
minority interest, and equity in the
earnings or losses of investees, then
such data must be prepared by the
company’s outside audit firm for the
Exchange’s consideration. In this regard,
the audit firm would have to issue an
independent accountant’s report on
applying agreed-upon procedures in
accordance with the standards
established by the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants[.];
(c) Exclusion of Merger or Acquisition
Related Costs Recorded under Pooling
of Interests;
(d) Exclusion of Charges or Income
Specifically Disclosed in the
Applicant’s SEC Filing for the
Following[:]—
(i) In connection with exiting an
activity for the following:
(1) Costs of severance and termination
benefits
(2) Costs and associated revenues and
expenses associated with the
elimination and reduction of product
lines
(3) Costs to consolidate or relocate
plant and office facilities
(4) Loss or gain on disposal of longlived assets
(ii) Environmental clean-up costs
(iii) Litigation settlement[.];
(e) Exclusion of Impairment Charges
on Long-lived Assets (goodwill,
property, plant, and equipment, and
other long-lived assets);
(f) Exclusion of Gains or Losses
Associated with Sales of a Subsidiary’s
or Investee’s Stock;
(g) Exclusion of In-Process Purchased
Research and Development Charges;
(h) Regulation S–X Article 11
Adjustments—Adjustments will include
those contained in a company’s pro
forma financial statements provided in
a current filing with the SEC pursuant
to SEC rules and regulations governing
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
12926
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 16, 2005 / Notices
Article 11 ‘‘Pro forma information of
Regulation S–X Part 210—Form and
Content of and Requirements for
Financial Statements[.];’’
(i) Exclusion of the Cumulative Effect
of Adoption of New Accounting
Standards (APB Opinion No. 20).
OR
(II) Valuation/Revenue Test
Companies listing under this standard
may satisfy either (a) the Valuation/
Revenue with Cash Flow Test or (b) the
Pure Valuation/Revenue Test.
(a) Valuation/Revenue with Cash
Flow Test—[A Company with]
(1) [not less than] at least
$500,000,000 in global market
capitalization, [and]
(2) at least $100,000,000 in revenues
during the most recent 12-month period,
[must] and
(3) [demonstrate from the operating
activity section of its cash flow
statement that its cash flow, which
represents net income adjusted to (a)
reconcile such amounts to cash
provided by operating activities, and (b)
exclude changes in operating assets and
liabilities, is] at least $25,000,000 [in
the] aggregate cash flows for the last
three fiscal years [and each year is
reported as a] with positive amounts in
all three years, as adjusted [(E)(F)]
pursuant to Paras. 102.01C (I)(2)(a) and
(b), as applicable.
A Company must demonstrate cash
flow based on the operating activity
section of its cash flow statement. Cash
flow represents net income adjusted to
(a) reconcile such amounts to cash
provided by operating activities, and (b)
exclude changes in operating assets and
liabilities. With respect to reconciling
amounts pursuant to this Paragraph, all
such amounts are limited to the amount
included in the company’s income
statement.
In the case of companies listing in
connection with an IPO, the company’s
underwriter (or, in the case of a spin-off,
the parent company’s investment
banker or other financial advisor) must
provide a written representation that
demonstrates the company’s ability to
meet the $500,000,000 global market
capitalization requirement based upon
the completion of the offering (or
distribution).
(b) Pure Valuation/Revenue Test—
(1) at least $750,000,000 in global
market capitalization, and
(2) at least $75,000,000 in revenues
during the most recent fiscal year.
In the case of companies listing in
connection with an IPO, the company’s
underwriter (or, in the case of a spin-off,
the parent company’s investment
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:45 Mar 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
banker or other financial advisor) must
provide a written representation that
demonstrates the company’s ability to
meet the $750,000,000 global market
capitalization requirement based upon
the completion of the offering (or
distribution). For all other companies,
market capitalization valuation will be
determined over a six-month average.
[OR
(III) For companies with not less than
$1 billion in total worldwide market
capitalization and with not less than
$100 million revenues in the recent
fiscal year, there are no additional
financial requirements. For such
companies listing in connection with an
IPO, the market capitalization valuation
must be demonstrated by written
representation from the underwriter (or,
in the case of a spin-off, by a written
representation from the parent
company’s investment banker or other
financial advisor) of the total market
capitalization of the company upon
completion of the offering (or
distribution). For all other such
companies, the market capitalization
valuation will be determined over a sixmonth average.]
OR
(III) Affiliated Company Test
(1) at least $500,000,000 in global
market capitalization;
(2) at least 12 months of operating
history (although a company is not
required to have been a separate
corporate entity for such period); and
(3) the company’s parent or affiliated
company is a listed company in good
standing (as evidenced by written
representation from the company or its
financial advisor excluding that portion
of the balance sheet attributable to the
new entity); and
(4) the company’s parent or affiliated
company retains control of the entity or
is under common control with the
entity.
In the case of companies listing in
connection with an IPO, the company’s
underwriter (or, in the case of a spin-off,
the parent company’s investment
banker or other financial advisor) must
provide a written representation that
demonstrates the company’s ability to
meet the $500,000,000 global market
capitalization requirement based upon
the completion of the offering (or
distribution).
‘‘Control’’ for purposes of the
Affiliated Company Test will mean
having the ability to exercise significant
influence over the operating and
financial policies of the listing
company, and will be presumed to exist
where the parent or affiliated company
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
holds 20% or more of the listing
company’s voting stock directly or
indirectly. Other indicia that may be
taken into account when determining
whether control exists include board
representation, participation in policy
making processes, material
intercompany transactions, interchange
of managerial personnel, and
technological dependency. The
Affiliated Company Test is taken from
and intended to be consistent with
generally accepted accounting
principles regarding use of the equity
method of accounting for an investment
in common stock.
(E) Only adjustments arising from
events specifically so indicated in the
company’s SEC filing(s) as to both
categorization and amount can and must
be made. Any such adjustment applies
only in the year in which the event
occurred except with regard to the use
of proceeds or acquisitions and
dispositions. Any company for which
the Exchange relies on adjustments in
granting clearance must include all
relevant adjusted financial data in its
listing application as specified in
Section 702.04, and disclose the use of
adjustments by including a statement in
a press release (i) that additional
information is available upon which the
NYSE relied to list the company and is
included in the listing application and
(ii) that such information is available to
the public upon request. This press
release must be issued concurrently
with any listing announcement issued
by the company or, if a listing
announcement is not issued, within 30
days from the date the company lists on
the NYSE.
(F) [The above-referenced adjustments
are measured and recognized] Interested
parties should apply the list of
adjustments in accordance with any
relevant accounting literature, such as
that published by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (‘‘FASB’’),
the Accounting Principles Board
(‘‘APB’’), the Emerging Issues Task
Force (‘‘EITF’’), the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants
(‘‘AICPA’’), and the SEC. Any literature
is intended to guide issuers and
investors regarding the affected
adjustment listed. If successor
interpretations (or guidelines) are
published with respect to any particular
adjustment, the most recent relevant
interpretations (or guidelines) should be
consulted.
*
*
*
*
*
[(IV) Affiliated Company Standard
(1) Market capitalization of
$500,000,000 million or greater (as
evidenced by written representation
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 16, 2005 / Notices
from the underwriter, company, or its
investment advisor);
(2) Minimum of 12 months of
operations (although it is not required to
have been a separate corporate entity for
such period);
(3) Parent or affiliated company is a
listed company in good standing (as
evidenced by written representation
from the company or its financial
advisor excluding that portion of the
balance sheet attributable to the new
entity); and
(4) Parent/affiliated company retains
control* of the entity or is under
common control* with the entity.
* ‘‘Control’’ for these purposes will
mean the ability to exercise significant
influence over operating and financial
policies, and will be presumed to exist
when the parent involved holds directly
or indirectly 20% or more of the entity’s
voting stock. Other indicia that may be
taken into account for this purpose
include board representation,
participation in policy making
processes, material intercompany
transactions, interchange of managerial
personnel, and technological
dependency. This test is taken from and
intended to be consistent with generally
accepted accounting principles
regarding use of the equity method of
accounting for an investment in
common stock.]
*
*
*
*
*
103.00
*
Non-U.S. Companies
*
*
*
*
103.01 Minimum Numerical
Standards—Non-U.S. Companies—
Equity Listings Distribution
*
*
*
*
*
103.01B A company must meet one of
the following financial standards:
(I) Earnings Test
(1) Pre-tax earnings from continuing
operations and after minority interest,
amortization and equity in the earnings
or losses of investees, adjusted [(C)(D)]
for items specified in Section
102.01C(I)(2)(a) through (i) above, and
103.01B(I)(2) below, must total at least[:]
$100,000,000 in the aggregate for the
last three fiscal years [together] with a
minimum of $25,000,000 in each of the
most recent two fiscal years.
(2) Additional Adjustment (C)(D)
Available for Foreign Currency
Devaluation. Non-operating adjustments
when associated with translation
adjustments representing a significant
devaluation of a country’s currency
(e.g., the currency of a company’s
country of domicile devalues by more
than 10 percent against the U.S. dollar
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:23 Mar 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
within a six-month period).
Adjustments may not include those
associated with normal currency gains
or losses.
(3) Reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of the
third year back would only be required
if the Exchange determines that
reconciliation is necessary to
demonstrate that the aggregate
$100,000,000 threshold is satisfied.
OR
(II) Valuation/Revenue Test
Companies listing under this standard
may satisfy either (a) the Valuation/
Revenue with Cash Flow Test or (b) the
Pure Valuation/Revenue Test.
(a) Valuation/Revenue with Cash
Flow Test—[A Company with]
(1) [not less than] at least
$500,000,000 in global market
capitalization, [and]
(2) at least $100,000,000 in revenues
during the most recent 12-month period,
[must] and
(3) [demonstrate from the operating
activity section of its cash flow
statement that its operating cash flow
excluding changes in operating assets
and liabilities is] at least $100,000,000
[in the] aggregate cash flows for the last
three fiscal years where each of the two
most recent years is reported at a
minimum of $25,000,000, [as] adjusted
in accordance with (C)(D) [for] Section
102.01C(I)(2)(a) and (b).
A Company must demonstrate cash
flow based on the operating activity
section of its cash flow statement. Cash
flow represents net income adjusted to
(a) reconcile such amounts to cash
provided by operating activities, and (b)
exclude changes in operating assets and
liabilities. With respect to reconciling
amounts pursuant to this Paragraph, all
such amounts are limited to the amount
included in the company’s income
statement.
In the case of companies listing in
connection with an IPO, the company’s
underwriter (or, in the case of a spin-off,
the parent company’s investment
banker or other financial advisor) must
provide a written representation that
demonstrates the company’s ability to
meet the $500,000,000 global market
capitalization requirement based upon
the completion of the offering (or
distribution).
Reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of the
third fiscal year back would only be
required if the Exchange determines that
reconciliation is necessary to
demonstrate that the [aggregate]
$100,000,000 aggregate cash flow
threshold is satisfied.
(b) Pure Valuation/Revenue Test—
(1) at least $750,000,000 in global
market capitalization, and
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12927
(2) at least $75,000,000 in revenues
during the most recent fiscal year.
In the case of companies listing in
connection with an IPO, the company’s
underwriter (or, in the case of a spin-off,
the parent company’s investment
banker or other financial advisor) must
provide a written representation that
demonstrates the company’s ability to
meet the $750,000,000 global market
capitalization requirement upon
completion of the offering (or
distribution). For all other companies,
market capitalization valuation will be
determined over a six-month average.
[OR
(III) For companies with not less than
$1 billion in total worldwide market
capitalization and with not less than
$100 million revenues in the recent
fiscal year, there are no additional
financial requirements. For such
companies listing in connection with an
IPO, the market capitalization valuation
must be demonstrated by a written
representation from the underwriter (or,
in the case of a spin-off, by a written
representation from the parent
company’s investment banker, other
financial advisor or transfer agent) of the
total market capitalization of the
company upon completion of the
offering (or distribution). For all other
such companies, the market
capitalization valuation will be
determined over a six-month average.]
OR
(III) Affiliated Company Test
(1) at least $500,000,000 in global
market capitalization;
(2) at least 12 months of operating
history (although a company is not
required to have been a separate
corporate entity for such period); and
(3) the company’s parent or affiliated
company is a listed company in good
standing (as evidenced by written
representation from the company or its
financial advisor excluding that portion
of the balance sheet attributable to the
new entity); and
(4) the company’s parent or affiliated
company retains control of the entity or
is under common control with the
entity.
In the case of companies listing in
connection with an IPO, the company’s
underwriter (or, in the case of a spin-off,
the parent company’s investment
banker or other financial advisor) must
provide a written representation that
demonstrates the company’s ability to
meet the $500,000,000 global market
capitalization requirement based upon
the completion of the offering (or
distribution).
‘‘Control’’ for purposes of the
Affiliated Company Test will mean
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
12928
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 16, 2005 / Notices
having the ability to exercise significant
influence over the operating and
financial policies of the listing
company, and will be presumed to exist
where the parent or affiliated company
holds 20% or more of the listing
company’s voting stock directly or
indirectly. Other indicia that may be
taken into account when determining
whether control exists include board
representation, participation in policy
making processes, material
intercompany transactions, interchange
of managerial personnel, and
technological dependency. The
Affiliated Company Test is taken from
and intended to be consistent with
generally accepted accounting
principles regarding use of the equity
method of accounting for an investment
in common stock.
(C) Only adjustments arising from
events specifically so indicated in the
company’s SEC filing(s) as to both
categorization and amount can and must
be made. Any such adjustments apply
only in the year in which the event
occurred except with regard to the use
of proceeds or acquisitions and
dispositions. Any company for which
the Exchange relies on adjustments in
granting clearance must include all
relevant adjusted financial data in its
listing application as specified in
Section 702.04, and disclose the use of
adjustments by including a statement in
a press release (i) that additional
information is available upon which the
NYSE relied to list the company and is
included in the listing application and
(ii) that such information is available to
the public upon request. This press
release must be issued concurrently
with any listing announcement issued
by the company or, if a listing
announcement is not issued, within 30
days from the date the company lists on
the NYSE.
(D) Interested parties should apply the
list of adjustments in accordance with
any relevant accounting literature, such
as that published by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (‘‘FASB),
the Accounting Principles Board
(‘‘APB’’), the Emerging Issues Task
Force (‘‘EITF’’), the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants
(‘‘AICPA’’), and the SEC. Any literature
is intended to guide issuers and
investors regarding the affected
adjustment listed. If successor
interpretations (or guidelines) are
published with respect to any particular
adjustment, the most recent relevant
interpretations (or guidelines) should be
consulted.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:45 Mar 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
[(IV) Affiliated Company Standard
(1) Market capitalization of $500
million or greater (as evidenced by
written representation from the
underwriter, company, or its investment
advisor);
(2) Minimum of 12 months of
operations (although it is not required to
have been a separate corporate entity for
such period);
(3) Parent or affiliated company is a
listed company in good standing (as
evidenced by written representation
from the company or its financial
advisor excluding that portion of the
balance sheet attributable to the new
entity); and
(4) Parent/affiliated company retains
control* of the entity or is under
common control* with the entity.
* ‘‘Control’’ for these purposes will
mean the ability to exercise significant
influence over operating and financial
policies, and will be presumed to exist
when the parent involved holds directly
or indirectly 20% or more of the entity’s
voting stock. Other indicia that may be
taken into account for this purpose
include board representation,
participation in policymaking processes,
material intercompany transactions,
interchange of managerial personnel,
and technological dependency. This test
is taken from and intended to be
consistent with generally accepted
accounting principles regarding use of
the equity method of accounting for an
investment in common stock.]
*
*
*
*
*
802.00
*
Continued Listing
*
*
*
*
802.01 Continued Listing Criteria
The Exchange would normally give
consideration to the prompt initiation of
suspension and delisting procedures
with respect to a security of either a
domestic or non-U.S. issuer when:
802.01A. Distribution Criteria for
Capital or Common Stock—
• Number of total stockholders (A) is
less than—400
OR
• Number of total stockholders (A) is
less than—1,200 and
• Average monthly trading volume is
less than—100,000 shares (for most
recent 12 months)
OR
• Number of publicly-held shares ([A]
B) is less than—600,000([B]C)
(A) The number of beneficial holders
of stock held in the name of Exchange
member organizations will be
considered in addition to holders of
record.
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
([A]B ) Shares held by directors,
officers, or their immediate families and
other concentrated holdings of 10% or
more are excluded in calculating the
number of publicly-held shares.
([B]C) If the unit of trading is less than
100 shares, the requirement relating to
the number of shares publicly held shall
be reduced proportionately.
802.01B Numerical Criteria for
Capital or Common Stock
[If] A[a] company that falls below
[any of the following] the criteria
applicable to the standard under which
it originally listed will be considered to
be below compliance [, it is subject to
the procedures outlined in Paras. 802.02
and 802.03:].
Notwithstanding items (I) to (IV)
below, the Exchange will promptly
initiate suspension and delisting
procedures with respect to a company if
that company is determined to have
average global market capitalization
over a consecutive 30 trading-day
period of less than $25,000,000,
regardless of the original standard
under which it listed. A company is not
eligible to follow the procedures
outlined in Sections 802.02 and 802.03
with respect to this criteria.
(I) A company that qualified to list
under the Earnings Test set out in
Section 102.01C(I) or in Section
103.01B(I) will be considered to be
below compliance standards if [(i)
A]average global market capitalization
over a consecutive 30 trading-day
period is less than [$50,000,000]
$75,000,000 and, at the same time, total
stockholders’ equity is less than
[$50,000,000] $75,000,000 [(C); or
(ii) Average global market
capitalization over a consecutive 30
trading-day period is less than
$15,000,000; or]
(II) A company that qualified to list
under the Valuation/Revenue with Cash
Flow Test set out in Section
102.01C(II)(a) or Section 103.01B(II)(a)
will be considered to be below
compliance standards if:
(i) Average global market
capitalization over a consecutive 30
trading-day period is less than
$250,000,000 and, at the same time,
total revenues are less than $20,000,000
over the last 12 months (unless the
company qualifies as an original listing
under one of the other original listing
standards); or
(ii) Average global market
capitalization over a consecutive 30
trading-day period is less than
$75,000,000.
[(iii) For companies that qualified for
original listing under the ‘‘global market
capitalization’’ standard:]
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 16, 2005 / Notices
(III) A company that qualified to list
under the Pure Valuation/Revenue Test
set out in Section 102.01C(II)(b) or
Section 103.01B(II)(b) will be considered
to be below compliance standards if:
(i) [A]average global market
capitalization over a consecutive 30
trading-day period is less than
[$500,000,000] $375,000,000 and, at the
same time, total revenues are less than
[$20,000,000] $15,000,000 over the last
12 months (unless the [resultant entity]
company qualifies as an original listing
under one of the other original listing
standards) [(D)]; or
(ii) average global market
capitalization over a consecutive 30
trading-day period is less than
$100,000,000.
(IV) A company that qualified to list
under the Affiliated Company Test set
out in Section 102.01C(III) or Section
103.01B(III) will be considered to be
below compliance standards if:
(i) the listed company’s parent/
affiliated company ceases to control the
listed company, or the listed company’s
parent/affiliated company itself falls
below the continued listing standards
applicable to the parent/affiliated
company, and:
(ii) average global market
capitalization over a consecutive 30
trading-day period is less than
$75,000,000 and, at the same time, total
stockholders’ equity is less than
$75,000,000.
When applying the market
capitalization test in any of the above
[three] four standards, the Exchange will
generally look to the total common stock
outstanding (excluding treasury shares)
as well as any common stock that would
be issued upon conversion of another
outstanding equity security. The
Exchange deems these securities to be
reflected in market value to such an
extent that the security is a ‘‘substantial
equivalent’’ of common stock. In this
regard, the Exchange will only consider
securities (1) publicly traded (or
quoted), or (2) convertible into a
publicly traded (or quoted) security. For
partnerships, the Exchange will analyze
the creation of the current capital
structure to determine whether it is
appropriate to include other publicly
traded securities in the calculation.
[Affiliated Companies—Will not be
subject to the $50,000,000 average
global market capitalization and
stockholders’ equity test unless the
parent/affiliated company no longer
controls the entity or such parent/
affiliated company itself falls below the
continued listing standards described in
this section.]
The Exchange will promptly initiate
suspension and delisting procedures
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:45 Mar 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
with respect to Funds, REITs and
Limited Partnerships [—will be subject
to immediate suspension and delisting
procedures] if the average market
capitalization of the entity over 30
consecutive trading days is below
[$15,000,000] $25,000,000 [or (2)]. In
addition, the Exchange will promptly
initiate suspension and delisting
procedures with respect to [in the case
of] a Fund[,] it ceases to maintain its
closed-end status.[, and in the case of a]
The Exchange will promptly initiate
suspension and delisting procedures
with respect to a REIT[,] it fails to
maintain its REIT status (unless the
resultant entity qualifies for an original
listing as a corporation).
The Exchange will notify the Fund,
REIT or limited partnership if the
average market capitalization falls
below [$25,000,000] $35,000,000 and
will advise the Fund, REIT or limited
partnership of the delisting standard.
Funds, REITs and limited partnerships
are not [subject] eligible to follow the
procedures outlined in Sections 802.02
and 802.03.
The Exchange will promptly initiate
suspension and delisting procedures
with respect to Bonds[—] if:
(i) [(•T]the aggregate market value or
principal amount of publicly-held
bonds is less than $1,000,000, or
(ii) [(•T]the issuer is not able to meet
its obligations on the listed debt
securities.
Bonds are not eligible to follow the
procedures outlined in Sections 802.02
and 802.03.
The Exchange will promptly initiate
suspension and delisting procedures
with respect to Preferred Stock,
Guaranteed Railroad Stock and Similar
Issues[—] if:
(i) [•]the [A]aggregate market value of
publicly-held shares is less than
$2,000,000, or
(ii) [•]the number of [P]publicly-held
shares is less than 100,000.
These types of securities are not
eligible to follow the procedures
outlined in Paras. 802.02 and 802.03.
[(C) To be considered in conformity
with continued listing standards
pursuant to Paras. 802.02 and 802.03, a
company that is determined to be below
this continued listing criterion must do
one of the following:
(i) Reestablish both its market
capitalization and its stockholders’
equity to the $50,000,000 level, or
(ii) Achieve average global market
capitalization over a consecutive 30
trading-day period of at least
$100,000,000, or
(iii) Achieve average global market
capitalization over a consecutive 30
trading-day period of $60,000,000, with
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12929
either (x) stockholders’ equity of at least
$40,000,000, or (y) an increase in
stockholders’ equity of at least
$40,000,000 since the company was
notified by the Exchange that it was
below continued listing standards.
(D) A company that is determined to
be below this continued listing criterion
must reestablish both its market
capitalization and its revenues to be
considered in conformity with
continued listing standards pursuant to
paras. 802.02 and 802.03.]
802.01C Price Criteria for Capital or
Common Stock[—]
A Company will be considered to be
below compliance standards if the
[A]average closing price of a security is
less than $1.00 over a consecutive 30trading-day period [(E)]. [(E)] Once
notified, the company must bring its
share price and average share price back
above $1.00 by six months following
receipt of the notification. [If this is the
only criteria that makes the company
below the Exchange’s continued listing
standards, the procedures outlined in
Paras. 802.02 and 802.03 do not apply.]
A company is not eligible to follow the
procedures outlined in Paras. 802.02
and 802.03 with respect to this criteria.
*
*
*
*
*
802.00
Continued Listing
802.02 Evaluation and Follow-Up
Procedures for Domestic Companies
The following procedures shall be
applied by the Exchange to domestic
companies [which] that are identified as
being below the Exchange’s continued
listing criteria. Notwithstanding the
above, when the Exchange deems it
necessary for the protection of investors,
trading in any security can be
suspended immediately, and
application made to the SEC to delist
the security.
Once the Exchange identifies, through
internal reviews or notice (a press
release, news story, company
communication, etc.), a company as
being below the continued listing
criteria set forth in Section 802.01(and
not able to otherwise qualify under an
original listing standard), the Exchange
will notify the company by letter of its
status within 10 business days. This
letter will also provide the company
with an opportunity to provide the
Exchange with a plan (the ‘‘Plan’’)
advising the Exchange of definitive
action the company has taken, or is
taking, that would bring it into
conformity with continued listing
standards within 18 months of receipt of
the letter.
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
12930
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 16, 2005 / Notices
Within 10 business days after receipt
of the letter, the company must contact
the Exchange to confirm receipt of
notification, discuss any possible
financial data of which the Exchange
may be unaware, and indicate whether
or not it plans to present a Plan;
otherwise, suspension and delisting
procedures will commence. If the
company submits a Plan, it must
identify specific quarterly milestones
against which the Exchange will
evaluate the company’s progress.
The company has 45 days from the
receipt of the letter to submit its Plan to
the Exchange for review; otherwise,
suspension and delisting procedures
will commence. If the company is
determined to be below the criteria
listed in Section 802.01B[(i) or
802.01B(iii)], the Plan it presents must
demonstrate how it will return to
compliance with the applicable
continued listing standard by the end of
the Plan period [reestablish both its
market capitalization and stockholders’
equity (or revenues, as applicable, to the
levels specified in such clauses].
In any event, all companies
submitting a Plan must include
quarterly financial projections, details
related to any strategic initiatives the
company plans to complete, and market
performance support. Exchange staff
will evaluate the Plan, including any
additional documentation that supports
the Plan, and make a determination as
to whether the company has made a
reasonable demonstration in the Plan of
an ability to come into conformity with
the relevant standard(s) within 18
months. The Exchange will make such
determination within 45 days of receipt
of the proposed Plan, and will promptly
notify the company of its determination
in writing.
The company also has 45 days from
receipt of the letter to issue a press
release disclosing the fact that it has
fallen below the continued listing
standards of the Exchange. If the
company fails to issue this press release
during the allotted 45 days, the
Exchange will issue the requisite press
release.
If the Exchange does not accept the
Plan, the Exchange will promptly
initiate suspension and delisting
procedures and issue a press release
disclosing the forthcoming suspension
and application to the SEC [for] to
delist[ing of] the company’s securities.
If the Exchange accepts the Plan, the
Exchange will review the company on a
quarterly basis for compliance with the
Plan. If the company fails to meet the
material aspects of the Plan or any of the
quarterly milestones, the Exchange will
review the circumstances and variance,
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:45 Mar 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
and determine whether such variance
warrants commencement of suspension
and delisting procedures. Should the
Exchange determine to proceed with
suspension and delisting procedures, it
may do so regardless of the company’s
continued listing status at that time. The
Exchange will deem the Plan period
over prior to the end of the 18 months
if a company is able to demonstrate
returning to compliance with the
applicable continued listing standards,
or achieving the ability to qualify under
an original listing standard, for a period
of two consecutive quarters. [This early
Plan termination will not be available to
a company based on satisfying the
alternative criteria specified in clauses
(ii) or (iii) of footnote C to Para.
802.01B.] In any event, if the company
does not meet continued listing
standards [(including the criteria
specified in footnote C to Section
802.01B, if applicable)] at the end of the
18-month period, the Exchange
promptly will initiate suspension and
delisting procedures.
If the company, within twelve months
of the end of the Plan period [(including
any early termination of the Plan period
under the procedures described above)],
is again determined to be below
continued listing standards, the
Exchange will examine the relationship
between the two incidents of falling
below continued listing standards and
re-evaluate the company’s method of
financial recovery from the first
incident. It will then take appropriate
action, which, depending upon the
circumstances, may include truncating
the procedures described above or
immediately initiating suspension and
delisting procedures.
802.03
Continued Listing
Evaluation and Follow-up Procedures
for Non-U.S. Companies
The following procedures shall be
applied by the Exchange to non-U.S.
companies [who] that are identified as
being below the Exchange’s continued
listing criteria. Notwithstanding the
above, when the Exchange deems it
necessary for the protection of the
investors, trading in any security can be
suspended immediately, and
application made to the SEC to delist
the security. Once the Exchange
identifies, through internal reviews or
notice (a press release, news story,
company communication, etc.), a
company as being below the continued
listing criteria set forth in Section
802.01(and not able to otherwise qualify
under an original listing standard), the
Exchange will notify the company by
letter of its status within 10 business
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
days. This letter will also provide the
company with an opportunity to
provide the Exchange with a plan (the
‘‘Plan’’) advising the Exchange of
definitive action the company has taken,
or is taking, that would bring it into
conformity with the standards within 18
month of receipt of the letter. Within 30
business days after receipt of the letter,
the company must contact the Exchange
to confirm receipt of notification,
discuss any possible financial data of
which the Exchange may be unaware,
and indicate whether or not it plans to
present a Plan; otherwise, suspension
and delisting procedures will
commence. If the company submits a
Plan, it must identify specific semiannual milestones against which the
Exchange will evaluate the company’s
progress.
The company has 90 days from the
receipt of the letter to submit its Plan to
the Exchange for review; otherwise,
suspension and delisting procedures
will commence. If the company is
determined to be below the criteria
listed in Section 802.01B [(i) or
802.01B(iii)], the Plan it presents must
demonstrate how it will return to
compliance with the applicable
continued listing standard by the end of
the Plan period [reestablish both its
market capitalization and stockholders’
equity (or revenues, as applicable, to the
levels specified in such clauses].
In any event, all companies
submitting a Plan must include
quarterly financial projections, details
related to any strategic initiatives the
company plans to complete, and market
performance support. Exchange staff
will evaluate the Plan, including any
additional documentation that supports
the Plan, and make a determination as
to whether the company has made a
reasonable demonstration in the Plan of
an ability to come into conformity with
the relevant standard(s) within 18
months. The Exchange will make such
determination within 45 days of receipt
of the proposed Plan, and will promptly
notify the company of its determination
in writing.
The company also has 90 days from
receipt of the letter to issue press release
disclosing the fact that it has fallen
below the continued listing standards of
the Exchange. If the company fails to
issue this press release during the
allotted 90 days, the Exchange will issue
the requisite press release.
If the Exchange does not accept the
Plan, the Exchange will promptly
initiate suspension and delisting
procedures and issue a press release
disclosing the forthcoming suspension
and application to the SEC to delist[ing
of] the company’s securities.
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 16, 2005 / Notices
If the Exchange accepts the Plan, the
Exchange will review the company on a
semi-annual basis for compliance with
the Plan. If the company fails to meet
the material aspects of the Plan or any
of the semi-annual milestones, the
Exchange will review the circumstances
and variance, and determine whether
such variance warrants commencement
of suspension and delisting procedures.
Should the Exchange determine to
proceed with suspension and delisting
procedures, it may do so regardless of
the company’s continued listing status
at that time. The Exchange will deem
the Plan period over prior to the end of
the 18 months if a company is able to
demonstrate returning to compliance
with the applicable continued listing
standards, or achieving the ability to
qualify under an original listing
standard, for a period of two
consecutive quarters. [This early Plan
termination will not be available to a
company based on satisfying the
alternative criteria specified in clauses
(ii) or (iii) of footnote C to Para.
802.01B.] In any event, the Exchange
will promptly initiate suspension and
delisting procedures with respect to [if
the] a company that does not meet the
continued listing standards [(including
the criteria specified in footnote C to
Para. 802.01B, if applicable)] at the end
of the 18-month period[, the Exchange
promptly will initiate suspension and
delisting procedures.]
If the company, within twelve months
of the end of the Plan period [(including
any early termination of the Plan period
under the procedures described above)],
is again determined to be below
continued listing standards, the
Exchange will examine the relationship
between the two incidents of falling
below continued listing standards and
re-evaluate the company’s method of
financial recovery from the first
incident. It will then take appropriate
action, which, depending upon the
circumstances, may include truncating
the procedures described above or
immediately initiating suspension and
delisting procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:45 Mar 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing
amendments to certain of its minimum
numerical standards for the listing and
continued listing of equity securities on
the NYSE. On January 29, 2004, the
Commission approved these proposed
amendments sought by the NYSE on a
pilot program basis (the ‘‘Pilot
Program’’).12 The Pilot Program
provided a transition period for
companies that were below compliance
under the previous continued listing
standards at the time the Pilot Program
was approved, granting them an
opportunity to present an additional
business plan advising the Exchange of
definitive action the company has taken,
or is taking, that would bring the
company into conformity with the Pilot
Program requirements within 12 months
of the end of their previous plan. No
transition period was provided,
however, for companies that were in
compliance with the previous standards
but not in compliance with the Pilot
Program standards at the time the Pilot
Program was approved.
Due to the fact that the Exchange
requested the Commission approve the
Pilot Program on an accelerated basis,
there was no opportunity for listed
companies to review and comment on
the Pilot Program requirements prior to
the date compliance was required. The
NYSE notes that a number of the listed
companies that did not comply with the
Pilot Program standards as of the date of
approval expressed significant dismay
at the automatic application of the new
continued listing standards.13 In order
to address these concerns, the Exchange
suspended the portions of the Pilot
Program relating to the continued listing
standards of Section 802.01B of the
NYSE’s Listed Company Manual.14 In
File No. SR–NYSE–2004–15, the
Exchange noted its intention to publish
12 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49154
(January 29, 2004), 69 FR 5633 (February 5, 2004)
(approving File No. SR–NYSE–2003–43).
13 See letters from Kenneth A. Hoogstra, von
Briesen & Roper, s.c., to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Commission, dated February 25, 2004, and W.
Randy Eaddy, Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, to Jonathan
G. Katz, Secretary, Commission, dated March 11,
2004, (commenting on File No. SR–NYSE–2003–
43).
14 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49443
(March 18, 2004), 69 FR 13929 (March 24, 2004)
(File No. SR–NYSE–2004–15).
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12931
the requirements of the Pilot Program
relating to Section 802.01B for public
comment on a non-accelerated
timeframe.15 File No. SR–NYSE–2004–
15 did not, however, amend the Pilot
Program with respect to Sections
102.01C and 103.01B of the NYSE’s
Listed Company Manual concerning
original minimum listing standards or
the Pilot Program’s non-substantive
change to the language of Section
802.01C.16
In this filing, File No. SR–NYSE–
2004–20, the Exchange now seeks
permanent approval for the Pilot
Program currently in effect with respect
to the Exchange’s original minimum
listing standards and approval of the
continued minimum listing standards as
initially proposed in File No. SR–
NYSE–2003–43. File No. SR–NYSE–
2004–20, as amended, by Amendment
No. 1 was published in the Federal
Register on July 2, 2004.17 The
Exchange also seeks approval for
continued minimum listing standards,
with changes to that proposed in File
No. SR–NYSE–2003–43 that are
responsive to public comments
submitted to the Commission. The
Exchange represents that it maintains an
ongoing dialog with knowledgeable
practitioners at investment banks,
broker-dealers, and venture capital
firms, and adjusts its listing standards
periodically to ensure that the standards
recognize and reflect current market
conditions and to allow the Exchange to
continue to attract quality companies.
The Exchange represents, furthermore,
that such changes are proposed only
after detailed analysis by Exchange staff
of how the proposed standards would
affect the NYSE list. The NYSE asserts
that the proposed amendments will
strengthen certain aspects of the
minimum original and continued listing
standards, while modestly easing the
pre-Pilot Program ‘‘Market-Cap/Revenue
Test’’ to enable the NYSE to list
somewhat younger companies that still
meet substantial quantitative thresholds
over their operating history. According
to the NYSE, Exchange staff monitored
the modest number of companies over
the last two years that would have met
the ‘‘Market-Cap/Revenue Test’’ as the
Exchange proposes to modify it and
found that those companies have
performed to a standard that would be
appropriate for inclusion on the NYSE
list. The Exchange represents that its
standard in this respect remains far
higher than any other U.S. marketplace.
15 See
id.
id.
17 See supra note 4.
16 See
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
12932
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 16, 2005 / Notices
Prior to the Pilot Program, Section
102.01C of the Listed Company Manual
provided that a company must meet one
of four specified financial standards in
order to qualify to have its equity
securities listed. The Exchange is
proposing permanent approval of
amendments to three of these four
standards that have been in effect under
the Pilot Program.18 The Exchange is
also proposing permanent approval of
amendments to Section 103.01B(III),
which provides a corresponding
numerical standard applicable to
international companies and have also
been in effect under the Pilot Program.
Prior to the Pilot Program, Section
102.01C(I) required that a company
demonstrate pre-tax earnings of $6.5
million in aggregate for the last three
fiscal years, with either a minimum of:
(a) $2.5 million in earnings in the most
recent fiscal year and $2 million in each
of the preceding two years; or (b) $4.5
million in earnings in the most recent
fiscal year, with positive earnings in
each of the preceding two years.
Pursuant to the Pilot Program, the
‘‘Earnings Test’’ requires that companies
demonstrate pre-tax earnings of $10
million in aggregate for the last three
fiscal years. It also requires that the
company demonstrate positive results in
all three of the years tested with a
minimum of $2.0 million in earnings in
each of the preceding two years. The
Exchange believes that these changes
strengthen the ‘‘Earnings Test’’ standard
and also simplify it by eliminating the
current two-tiered structure.
Prior to the Pilot Program, Section
102.01C(II) of the Listed Company
Manual required that a company
demonstrate market capitalization of at
least $500 million and revenues of at
least $100 million over the most recent
12-month period. Provided that these
thresholds were met, a company with
operating cash flows of at least $25
million in aggregate for the last three
fiscal years and positive amounts in
each of the three fiscal years would have
qualified for listing. Section 102.01C(III)
required that an issuer demonstrate (a)
market capitalization of at least $1
billion and (b) revenues of at least $100
million in the most recent fiscal year.
Because both of these tests are valuation
and revenue-based, the Exchange now
seeks permanent approval to
consolidate them into one test with two
alternative subsections. One of the
sections of the current Pilot Program,
18 The ‘‘Earnings Test,’’ the ‘‘Valuation/Revenue
Test’’ (incorporating in one section the pre-Pilot
Program Valuation/Revenue with Cash Flow Test
and in another section the Pure Valuation/Revenue
Test), or the ‘‘Affiliated Company Test.’’ See supra
note 11 (approving File No. SR–NYSE–2003–43).
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:45 Mar 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
the ‘‘Valuation/Revenue Test,’’
incorporates the pre-Pilot Program
requirements of Section 102.01C(II) as
the ‘‘Valuation/Revenue with Cash Flow
Test’’ with no change to the previous
thresholds. The other section
incorporates the pre-Pilot Program
requirements of Section 102.01C(III) as
the ‘‘Pure Valuation/Revenue Test.’’ In
addition, the Exchange is proposing to
permanently approve the amendments
to the thresholds of Section 102.01C(III)
that require that companies demonstrate
(a) market capitalization of at least $750
million and (b) revenues of at least $75
million during the most recent fiscal
year. As noted above, the Exchange
represents that its staff has monitored
the modest number of companies over
the last two years that would have met
the Pilot Program’s ‘‘Pure Valuation/
Revenue Test’’ and found that those
companies performed to a standard that
is appropriate for inclusion on the
NYSE list.
The Exchange is also proposing
permanent approval of corresponding
restructuring changes to Section
103.01B of the Listed Company Manual,
which sets out minimum numerical
standards for non-U.S. issuers. The
Exchange is also proposing permanent
approval of changes to the numeric
thresholds of Section 103.01B(III) in
accordance with changes to Section
102.01C(III).
In addition, the Exchange seeks
permanent approval of its suspended
Pilot Program restructuring and
amending the numerical continued
listing standards. Section 802.01B of the
Listed Company Manual currently
applies to companies that fall below any
of the following criteria: (i) Average
global market capitalization over a
consecutive 30 trading-day period is
less than $50 million and total
stockholders’ equity is less than $50
million; or (ii) average global market
capitalization over a consecutive 30trading-day period is less than $15
million; or (iii) for companies that
qualified for original listing under the
‘‘global market capitalization’’ standard,
(a) average global market capitalization
over a consecutive 30 trading-day
period is less than $500 million and
total revenues are less than $20 million
over the last 12 months (unless the
resultant entity qualifies as an original
listing under one of the other original
listing standards), or (b) average global
market capitalization over a consecutive
30 trading-day period is less than $100
million.
The Exchange proposes to amend
these thresholds and to specifically
relate the continued listing standards of
Section 802.01B of the Listed Company
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Manual to the original listing standards
of Section 102.01C used to qualify a
company for listing. In addition, the
Exchange proposes to add a minimum
continued listing standard applicable to
all companies regardless of original
listing standard. This standard would
require that all companies maintain
average global market capitalization
over a consecutive 30 trading-day
period of at least $25,000,000 or be
subject to suspension and delisting (the
‘‘Minimum Continued Listing
Standard’’).19
Companies that list under the Pilot
Program ‘‘Earnings Test’’ or its
predecessor test will be considered to be
below compliance if average global
market capitalization over a consecutive
30 trading-day period is less than
$75,000,000 and, at the same time, total
stockholders’ equity is less than
$75,000,000. This level has been
increased in the proposal to reflect
marketplace expectations of those
companies deemed suitable for
continued listing. The current alternate
threshold for the Earnings Test that
resulted in a company being below
compliance if average global market
capitalization over a consecutive 30
trading-day period is less than
$15,000,000 is proposed to be
eliminated as a result of the proposed
$25,000,000 Minimum Continued
Listing Standard.
Issuers that list under the Pilot
Program’s ‘‘Valuation/Revenue with
Cash Flow Test’’ or its predecessor test
would be considered to be below
compliance standards if: (a) Average
global market capitalization over a
consecutive 30 trading-day period is
less than $250 million and, at the same
time, total revenues are less than $20
million over the last 12 months (unless
the company qualifies as an original
listing under one of the other original
listing standards); 20 or (b) average
global market capitalization over a
consecutive 30 trading-day period is
less than $75 million.
Issuers that list under the Pilot
Program’s ‘‘Pure Valuation/Revenue
Test’’ or its predecessor test would be
19 This requirement is in substance identical to
the proposal in File No. SR–NYSE–2003–43, but it
restates the standard in a manner the Exchange
believes is more readily understandable. In a
substantive change from the current provisions and
from the proposals as published for public
comment, companies that fall below this minimum
threshold would not be afforded the opportunity to
submit a plan and ‘‘cure’’ their noncompliance over
a plan period. In addition, companies that list
under the Affiliated Company Test would be
subject to the proposed $25,000,000 threshold,
regardless of the status of their parent company.
20 These levels are lower than the existing ‘‘global
market capitalization’’ standard.
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 16, 2005 / Notices
considered to be below compliance
standards if: (a) Average global market
capitalization over a consecutive 30
trading-day period is less than $375
million and, at the same time, total
revenues are less than $15 million over
the last 12 months (unless the company
qualifies as an original listing under one
of the other original listing standards);
or (b) average global market
capitalization over a consecutive 30
trading-day period is less than $100
million.
The Exchange also proposes to clarify
that, in circumstances where a listed
company’s parent or affiliated company
no longer controls the listed company or
such listed company’s parent or
affiliated company falls below the
continued listing standards applicable
to the parent or affiliated company, the
continued listing standards applicable
to the Pilot Program’s ‘‘Earnings Test’’
would apply to companies that
originally listed under the Affiliated
Company Standard. Amendments are
also proposed to make clear that
companies that list under the Affiliated
Company Standard are subject to the
Minimum Continued Listing Standard,
regardless of the status of the listed
company’s parent. In addition, the
Exchange proposes to increase the
continued listing criteria for closed-end
funds, REITs, and limited partnerships
from $15 million to $25 million with a
corresponding increase to the
notification threshold from $25 million
to $35 million.
Companies that fall below the
foregoing minimum standards could be
permitted a period of time to return to
compliance, in accordance with the
procedures specified in Sections 802.02
and 802.03 of the Listed Company
Manual. As a general matter, companies
must reestablish the level of market
capitalization (and, if applicable,
shareholder’s equity) specified in the
continued listing standard below which
the company fell. However, with respect
to the current requirements of Section
802.01B(I) that a company reestablish
both its market capitalization and its
stockholders’ equity to the $50 million
level, footnote (C) to Section 802.01B
provides several alternatives. Currently,
the footnote specifies that, to return to
conformity, a company must do one of
the following: (a) Reestablish both its
market capitalization and its
stockholders’ equity to the $50 million
level; (b) achieve average global market
capitalization over a consecutive 30trading-day period of at least $100
million; or (c) achieve average global
market capitalization over a consecutive
30-trading-day period of $60 million,
with either (x) stockholders’ equity of at
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:45 Mar 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
least $40 million, or (y) an increase in
stockholders’ equity of at least $40
million, since the company was notified
by the Exchange that it was below
continued listing standards. Likewise,
with respect to the current requirements
of Section 802.01B(iii) relating to
companies that listed under the current
global market capitalization standard,
footnote (D) states that companies must
reestablish both market capitalization
and revenues in conformity with
continued listing standards.
In a change from the proposals as
originally published for comment, the
Exchange proposes to eliminate
footnotes (C) and (D) to Section 802.01B
of the Listed Company Manual, and,
instead proposes to amend Sections
802.02 and 802.03 to provide that a
listed company’s plan to regain
compliance need only demonstrate how
the company will cease to trigger the
applicable Section 802.01B continued
listing standard at the end of the
allowable recovery period. For example,
a company that listed under the
proposed Earnings Test would be
required to submit a plan that
demonstrates how the company will
exceed either the $75,000,000 market
capitalization or shareholders’ equity
threshold, rather than be required to
exceed both thresholds to regain
compliance. It has been the Exchange’s
experience over the last five years that
the sustained restoration of one
component of the continued listing
standard thresholds is evidence of a
company’s recovery. Due to the fact that
a company would not be deemed below
compliance unless it fell below both
thresholds at the same time, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
amendment provides companies with a
more rational basis for returning to
compliance. This proposed change
eliminates the potential for certain
anomalies in situations where, for
example, a company’s stockholders’
equity may never have been above the
minimum and a decrease in market
capitalization below the required
threshold triggers non-compliance.
Since it is the fact that market
capitalization also dropped below the
required threshold that results in a
deficiency despite no change to
stockholders’ equity, the Exchange
proposes to only require that the
company recover market capitalization
in order to regain compliance.
The Exchange represents that it has
considered how to transition the abovedescribed changes to the continued
listing standards and intends to provide
a period of 30 trading days from the date
of any Commission approval of the
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12933
proposed amendments until such
amendments would become effective.
Sections 802.02 and 802.03 of the
Listed Company Manual provide that,
with respect to a company which is
determined to be below continued
listing standards a second time within
12 months of successful recovery from
previous non-compliance, the Exchange
will examine the relationship between
the two incidents of falling below
continued listing standards and reevaluate the company’s method of
financial recovery from the first
incident. The Exchange may then take
appropriate action, which, depending
upon the circumstances, may include
truncating the normal procedures for
reestablishing conformity with the
continued listing standards or
immediately initiating suspension and
delisting procedures. For those
companies that are within such a 12month period and that would be
deemed to be below continued listing
standards as a direct result of the
approval of the amendments proposed
in this filing, the Exchange would not
intend to truncate or immediately
initiate suspension and delisting solely
on the basis of the proposed increase to
the current continued listing standards.
The Exchange would take into
consideration all of the facts and
circumstances relating to the company
in determining whether to allow such
company an opportunity to submit a
second plan.
With respect to an issuer currently
below the continued listing standards
now in force, the Exchange intends to
allow it to complete its applicable
follow-up procedures and plan for
return to compliance as provided in
Sections 802.02 and 802.03 of the Listed
Company Manual. If, at the end thereof,
the issuer is compliant with the
continued listing standards about which
it was originally notified, but below the
increased requirements set forth above,
the Exchange would grant it an
opportunity to present an additional
business plan advising the Exchange of
definitive action the issuer has taken, or
is taking, that would bring it into
conformity with the increased
requirements within a further 12
months. In addition, if an issuer were to
complete its currently applicable
follow-up procedures and plan and
were not compliant at that time with the
continued listing standards about which
it was originally notified, but is above
the increased requirements set forth
above, the Exchange would consider
that issuer to be in conformity with the
continued listing standards.
For an issuer that is in compliance
with the continued listing standards
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
12934
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 16, 2005 / Notices
now in force, but that might be below
the continued listing standards
proposed herein, the proposed 30-day
measurement period prior to
effectiveness would allow the Exchange
sufficient time to provide early
warnings to any issuer that would
potentially be below compliance at the
end of that period. If, at the end of the
30-trading-day measurement period, an
issuer is below the increased
requirements set forth above, the
Exchange would formally notify the
issuer of such non-compliance and
provide it with an opportunity to
present a business plan within 45 days
of that notification advising the
Exchange of definitive action the issuer
would take to bring it into conformity
with the increased requirements within
an 18-month period.
Finally, the Exchange is proposing
minor technical and conforming
changes to Sections 102.02C, 103.01B,
802.01A, 802.01B, and 802.01C of the
Listed Company Manual.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change satisfies the
requirement under Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act 21 that the Exchange’s rules be
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The NYSE does not believe that the
proposed rule change would impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The NYSE did not solicit or receive
written comments on the proposed rule
change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding, or
21 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:45 Mar 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
(ii) as to which the Exchange consents,
the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed
rule change; or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.22
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–1132 Filed 3–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NYSE–2004–20 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
20549–0609. All submissions should
refer to File Number SR–NYSE–2004–
20. This file number should be included
on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and
review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on
the Commission’s Internet Web site
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Section, 450 Fifth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the NYSE. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–NYSE–
2004–20 and should be submitted on or
before April 6, 2005.
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–51350; File No. SR-OCC–
2004–19]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Options Clearing Corporation; Order
Approving a Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Clearing Member Trade
Assignment Processing
March 9, 2005.
On November 1, 2004, the Options
Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) a
proposed rule change (File No. SROCC–2004–19) pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.1 Notice of the proposal was
published in the Federal Register on
February 7, 2005.2 No comment letters
were received. For the reasons
discussed below, the Commission is
approving the proposed rule change.
I. Description
The proposed rule change will add
new clearing member trade assignment
(‘‘CMTA’’) processing requirements to
OCC’s By-Laws and Rules. Specifically,
OCC will modify Article I
(‘‘Definitions’’) of its By-Laws and Rules
401 and 403 to require clearing
members that are parties to a CMTA
arrangement involving CMTA customers
to register with OCC certain customer
identifiers that the clearing members
use to process the CMTA transactions.
The new rules will provide that an
exchange transaction executed on behalf
of a CMTA customer that is to be
transferred by CMTA processing for
clearance and settlement will be
identified by a special indicator called
a Customer CMTA Indicator in the
matching trade information submitted
with respect to that transaction.3 For
each transaction marked with the
22 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51120 (Feb.
1, 2005), 70 FR 6486.
3 The same indicator will be used by all options
exchanges. OCC made various system changes to
process this indicator and other information to be
supplied with respect to CMTA customers’
transactions. Matching trade information submitted
by the options exchanges will need to include this
information that requires changes to the exchanges’
systems.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12924-12934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-1132]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-51322, File No. SR-NYSE-2004-20]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule
Change and Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 Thereto by the New
York Stock Exchange, Inc., To Amend Its Original and Continued
Quantitative Listing Standards
March 8, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 13, 2004, the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'' or ``SEC'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. On May 20, 2004, NYSE submitted Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.\3\ The proposed rule change, as amended, was
published for comment in the Federal Register on July 2, 2004.\4\ On
August 31, 2004, NYSE submitted Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule
change.\5\ On November 29, 2004, NYSE submitted Amendment No. 3 to the
proposed rule change.\6\ On December
[[Page 12925]]
17, 2004, NYSE withdrew Amendment No. 3. On December 17, 2004, NYSE
submitted Amendment No. 4 to the proposed rule change.\7\ On January
25, 2005, NYSE submitted Amendment No. 5 to the proposed rule
change.\8\ On February 17, 2005, NYSE submitted Amendment No. 6 to the
proposed rule change.\9\ On March 4, 2005, NYSE submitted Amendment No.
7 to the proposed rule change.\10\ The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended,
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Amendment No. 1 replaced and superseded the original filing
in its entirety.
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49917 (June 25,
2004), 69 FR 40439.
\5\ Amendment No. 2 replaced and superseded the original filing
in its entirety.
\6\ Amendment No. 3 replaced and superseded the original filing
in its entirety.
\7\ Amendment No. 4 replaced and superseded the original filing
in its entirety.
\8\ Amendment No. 5 replaced and superseded the original filing
in its entirety.
\9\ Amendment No. 6 partially amended Sections 802.01B, 802.02,
and 802.03 of the proposed rule text.
\10\ Amendment No. 7 partially amended Sections 802.03 of the
proposed rule text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The NYSE is proposing to amend Sections 102.01C, 103.01B, 802.01A,
802.01B, 802.01C, 802.02, and 802.03 of the NYSE's Listed Company
Manual regarding the minimum numerical original and continued listing
standards. Proposed new language is italicized; deletions are
bracketed.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ NYSE amended the proposed rule change to make technical
corrections to Exhibit 5 of the proposed rule change. E-mail from
Annemarie Tierney, Assistant General Counsel, and Glenn Tyranski,
Vice President, Financial Compliance, NYSE, dated February 24, 2005.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
102.00 Domestic Companies
* * * * *
102.01C A company must meet one of the following financial standards.
(I) Earnings Test
(1) Pre-tax earnings from continuing operations and after minority
interest, amortization and equity in the earnings or losses of
investees, [as] adjusted [(E)] for items specified in (2)(a) through
(2)(i) below [(F)] must total at least[.] [$2,500,000 in the latest
fiscal year together with $2,000,000 in each of the preceding two
years; or $6,500,000] $10,000,000 in the aggregate for the last three
fiscal years together with a minimum of $[4,5]2,000,000 in each of the
two most recent fiscal years, and positive amounts [for] in all [each
of the preceding two] three years.
(2) Adjustments (E)(F) that must be included in the calculation of
the amounts required in paragraph (1) are as follows:
(a) Application of Use of Proceeds[.]--If a company is in
registration with the SEC and is in the process of an equity offering,
adjustments should be made to reflect the net proceeds of that
offering, and the specified intended application(s) of such proceeds
to:
(i) Pay off existing debt[.]: The adjustment will include
elimination of the actual historical interest on debt being retired
with offering proceeds of all relevant periods. If the event giving
rise to the adjustment occurred during a time-period such that pro
forma amounts are not set forth in the SEC registration statement
(typically, the pro forma effect of repayment of debt will be provided
in the current registration statement only with respect to the last
fiscal year plus any interim period in accordance with SEC rules), the
company must prepare the relevant adjusted financial data to reflect
the adjustment to its historical financial data, and its outside audit
firm must provide a report of having applied agreed-upon procedures
with respect to such adjustments. Such report must be prepared in
accordance with the standards established by the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants.
(ii) Fund an acquisition:
(1) The adjustments will include those applicable with respect to
acquisition(s) to be funded with the proceeds. Adjustments will be made
that are disclosed as such in accordance with Rule 3-05 ``Financial
Statements of Business Acquired or to be Acquired'' and Article 11 of
Regulation S-X. Adjustments will be made for all the relevant periods
for those acquisitions for which historical financial information of
the acquiree is required to be disclosed in the SEC registration
statement; and
(2) Adjustments applicable to any period for which pro forma
numbers are not set forth in the registration statement shall be
accompanied by the relevant adjusted financial data to combine the
historical results of the acquiree (or relevant portion thereof) and
acquiror, as disclosed in the company's SEC filing. Under SEC rules,
the number of periods disclosed depends upon the significance level of
the acquiree to the acquiror. The adjustments will include those
necessary to reflect (a) the allocation of the purchase price,
including adjusting assets and liabilities of the acquiree to fair
value recognizing any intangibles (and associated amortization and
depreciation), and (b) the effects of additional financing to complete
the acquisition. The company must prepare the relevant adjusted
financial data to reflect the adjustment to its historical financial
data, and its outside audit firm must provide a report of having
applied agreed-upon procedures with respect to such adjustments. Such
report must be prepared in accordance with the standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants[.];
(b) Acquisitions and Dispositions[:]--In instances other than
acquisitions (and related dispositions of part of the acquiree) funded
with the use of proceeds, adjustments will be made for those
acquisitions and dispositions that are disclosed as such in a company's
financial statements in accordance with Rule 3-05 ``Financial
Statements of Business Acquired or to be Acquired'' and Article 11 of
Regulation S-X. If the disclosure does not specify pre-tax earnings
from continuing operations, minority interest, and equity in the
earnings or losses of investees, then such data must be prepared by the
company's outside audit firm for the Exchange's consideration. In this
regard, the audit firm would have to issue an independent accountant's
report on applying agreed-upon procedures in accordance with the
standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants[.];
(c) Exclusion of Merger or Acquisition Related Costs Recorded under
Pooling of Interests;
(d) Exclusion of Charges or Income Specifically Disclosed in the
Applicant's SEC Filing for the Following[:]--
(i) In connection with exiting an activity for the following:
(1) Costs of severance and termination benefits
(2) Costs and associated revenues and expenses associated with the
elimination and reduction of product lines
(3) Costs to consolidate or relocate plant and office facilities
(4) Loss or gain on disposal of long-lived assets
(ii) Environmental clean-up costs
(iii) Litigation settlement[.];
(e) Exclusion of Impairment Charges on Long-lived Assets (goodwill,
property, plant, and equipment, and other long-lived assets);
(f) Exclusion of Gains or Losses Associated with Sales of a
Subsidiary's or Investee's Stock;
(g) Exclusion of In-Process Purchased Research and Development
Charges;
(h) Regulation S-X Article 11 Adjustments--Adjustments will include
those contained in a company's pro forma financial statements provided
in a current filing with the SEC pursuant to SEC rules and regulations
governing
[[Page 12926]]
Article 11 ``Pro forma information of Regulation S-X Part 210--Form and
Content of and Requirements for Financial Statements[.];''
(i) Exclusion of the Cumulative Effect of Adoption of New
Accounting Standards (APB Opinion No. 20).
OR
(II) Valuation/Revenue Test
Companies listing under this standard may satisfy either (a) the
Valuation/Revenue with Cash Flow Test or (b) the Pure Valuation/Revenue
Test.
(a) Valuation/Revenue with Cash Flow Test--[A Company with]
(1) [not less than] at least $500,000,000 in global market
capitalization, [and]
(2) at least $100,000,000 in revenues during the most recent 12-
month period, [must] and
(3) [demonstrate from the operating activity section of its cash
flow statement that its cash flow, which represents net income adjusted
to (a) reconcile such amounts to cash provided by operating activities,
and (b) exclude changes in operating assets and liabilities, is] at
least $25,000,000 [in the] aggregate cash flows for the last three
fiscal years [and each year is reported as a] with positive amounts in
all three years, as adjusted [(E)(F)] pursuant to Paras. 102.01C
(I)(2)(a) and (b), as applicable.
A Company must demonstrate cash flow based on the operating
activity section of its cash flow statement. Cash flow represents net
income adjusted to (a) reconcile such amounts to cash provided by
operating activities, and (b) exclude changes in operating assets and
liabilities. With respect to reconciling amounts pursuant to this
Paragraph, all such amounts are limited to the amount included in the
company's income statement.
In the case of companies listing in connection with an IPO, the
company's underwriter (or, in the case of a spin-off, the parent
company's investment banker or other financial advisor) must provide a
written representation that demonstrates the company's ability to meet
the $500,000,000 global market capitalization requirement based upon
the completion of the offering (or distribution).
(b) Pure Valuation/Revenue Test--
(1) at least $750,000,000 in global market capitalization, and
(2) at least $75,000,000 in revenues during the most recent fiscal
year.
In the case of companies listing in connection with an IPO, the
company's underwriter (or, in the case of a spin-off, the parent
company's investment banker or other financial advisor) must provide a
written representation that demonstrates the company's ability to meet
the $750,000,000 global market capitalization requirement based upon
the completion of the offering (or distribution). For all other
companies, market capitalization valuation will be determined over a
six-month average.
[OR
(III) For companies with not less than $1 billion in total
worldwide market capitalization and with not less than $100 million
revenues in the recent fiscal year, there are no additional financial
requirements. For such companies listing in connection with an IPO, the
market capitalization valuation must be demonstrated by written
representation from the underwriter (or, in the case of a spin-off, by
a written representation from the parent company's investment banker or
other financial advisor) of the total market capitalization of the
company upon completion of the offering (or distribution). For all
other such companies, the market capitalization valuation will be
determined over a six-month average.]
OR
(III) Affiliated Company Test
(1) at least $500,000,000 in global market capitalization;
(2) at least 12 months of operating history (although a company is
not required to have been a separate corporate entity for such period);
and
(3) the company's parent or affiliated company is a listed company
in good standing (as evidenced by written representation from the
company or its financial advisor excluding that portion of the balance
sheet attributable to the new entity); and
(4) the company's parent or affiliated company retains control of
the entity or is under common control with the entity.
In the case of companies listing in connection with an IPO, the
company's underwriter (or, in the case of a spin-off, the parent
company's investment banker or other financial advisor) must provide a
written representation that demonstrates the company's ability to meet
the $500,000,000 global market capitalization requirement based upon
the completion of the offering (or distribution).
``Control'' for purposes of the Affiliated Company Test will mean
having the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating
and financial policies of the listing company, and will be presumed to
exist where the parent or affiliated company holds 20% or more of the
listing company's voting stock directly or indirectly. Other indicia
that may be taken into account when determining whether control exists
include board representation, participation in policy making processes,
material intercompany transactions, interchange of managerial
personnel, and technological dependency. The Affiliated Company Test is
taken from and intended to be consistent with generally accepted
accounting principles regarding use of the equity method of accounting
for an investment in common stock.
(E) Only adjustments arising from events specifically so indicated
in the company's SEC filing(s) as to both categorization and amount can
and must be made. Any such adjustment applies only in the year in which
the event occurred except with regard to the use of proceeds or
acquisitions and dispositions. Any company for which the Exchange
relies on adjustments in granting clearance must include all relevant
adjusted financial data in its listing application as specified in
Section 702.04, and disclose the use of adjustments by including a
statement in a press release (i) that additional information is
available upon which the NYSE relied to list the company and is
included in the listing application and (ii) that such information is
available to the public upon request. This press release must be issued
concurrently with any listing announcement issued by the company or, if
a listing announcement is not issued, within 30 days from the date the
company lists on the NYSE.
(F) [The above-referenced adjustments are measured and recognized]
Interested parties should apply the list of adjustments in accordance
with any relevant accounting literature, such as that published by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (``FASB''), the Accounting
Principles Board (``APB''), the Emerging Issues Task Force (``EITF''),
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (``AICPA''), and
the SEC. Any literature is intended to guide issuers and investors
regarding the affected adjustment listed. If successor interpretations
(or guidelines) are published with respect to any particular
adjustment, the most recent relevant interpretations (or guidelines)
should be consulted.
* * * * *
[(IV) Affiliated Company Standard
(1) Market capitalization of $500,000,000 million or greater (as
evidenced by written representation
[[Page 12927]]
from the underwriter, company, or its investment advisor);
(2) Minimum of 12 months of operations (although it is not required
to have been a separate corporate entity for such period);
(3) Parent or affiliated company is a listed company in good
standing (as evidenced by written representation from the company or
its financial advisor excluding that portion of the balance sheet
attributable to the new entity); and
(4) Parent/affiliated company retains control* of the entity or is
under common control* with the entity.
* ``Control'' for these purposes will mean the ability to exercise
significant influence over operating and financial policies, and will
be presumed to exist when the parent involved holds directly or
indirectly 20% or more of the entity's voting stock. Other indicia that
may be taken into account for this purpose include board
representation, participation in policy making processes, material
intercompany transactions, interchange of managerial personnel, and
technological dependency. This test is taken from and intended to be
consistent with generally accepted accounting principles regarding use
of the equity method of accounting for an investment in common stock.]
* * * * *
103.00 Non-U.S. Companies
* * * * *
103.01 Minimum Numerical Standards--Non-U.S. Companies--Equity Listings
Distribution
* * * * *
103.01B A company must meet one of the following financial standards:
(I) Earnings Test
(1) Pre-tax earnings from continuing operations and after minority
interest, amortization and equity in the earnings or losses of
investees, adjusted [(C)(D)] for items specified in Section
102.01C(I)(2)(a) through (i) above, and 103.01B(I)(2) below, must total
at least[:] $100,000,000 in the aggregate for the last three fiscal
years [together] with a minimum of $25,000,000 in each of the most
recent two fiscal years.
(2) Additional Adjustment (C)(D) Available for Foreign Currency
Devaluation. Non-operating adjustments when associated with translation
adjustments representing a significant devaluation of a country's
currency (e.g., the currency of a company's country of domicile
devalues by more than 10 percent against the U.S. dollar within a six-
month period). Adjustments may not include those associated with normal
currency gains or losses.
(3) Reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of the third year back would only
be required if the Exchange determines that reconciliation is necessary
to demonstrate that the aggregate $100,000,000 threshold is satisfied.
OR
(II) Valuation/Revenue Test
Companies listing under this standard may satisfy either (a) the
Valuation/Revenue with Cash Flow Test or (b) the Pure Valuation/Revenue
Test.
(a) Valuation/Revenue with Cash Flow Test--[A Company with]
(1) [not less than] at least $500,000,000 in global market
capitalization, [and]
(2) at least $100,000,000 in revenues during the most recent 12-
month period, [must] and
(3) [demonstrate from the operating activity section of its cash
flow statement that its operating cash flow excluding changes in
operating assets and liabilities is] at least $100,000,000 [in the]
aggregate cash flows for the last three fiscal years where each of the
two most recent years is reported at a minimum of $25,000,000, [as]
adjusted in accordance with (C)(D) [for] Section 102.01C(I)(2)(a) and
(b).
A Company must demonstrate cash flow based on the operating
activity section of its cash flow statement. Cash flow represents net
income adjusted to (a) reconcile such amounts to cash provided by
operating activities, and (b) exclude changes in operating assets and
liabilities. With respect to reconciling amounts pursuant to this
Paragraph, all such amounts are limited to the amount included in the
company's income statement.
In the case of companies listing in connection with an IPO, the
company's underwriter (or, in the case of a spin-off, the parent
company's investment banker or other financial advisor) must provide a
written representation that demonstrates the company's ability to meet
the $500,000,000 global market capitalization requirement based upon
the completion of the offering (or distribution).
Reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of the third fiscal year back would
only be required if the Exchange determines that reconciliation is
necessary to demonstrate that the [aggregate] $100,000,000 aggregate
cash flow threshold is satisfied.
(b) Pure Valuation/Revenue Test--
(1) at least $750,000,000 in global market capitalization, and
(2) at least $75,000,000 in revenues during the most recent fiscal
year.
In the case of companies listing in connection with an IPO, the
company's underwriter (or, in the case of a spin-off, the parent
company's investment banker or other financial advisor) must provide a
written representation that demonstrates the company's ability to meet
the $750,000,000 global market capitalization requirement upon
completion of the offering (or distribution). For all other companies,
market capitalization valuation will be determined over a six-month
average.
[OR
(III) For companies with not less than $1 billion in total
worldwide market capitalization and with not less than $100 million
revenues in the recent fiscal year, there are no additional financial
requirements. For such companies listing in connection with an IPO, the
market capitalization valuation must be demonstrated by a written
representation from the underwriter (or, in the case of a spin-off, by
a written representation from the parent company's investment banker,
other financial advisor or transfer agent) of the total market
capitalization of the company upon completion of the offering (or
distribution). For all other such companies, the market capitalization
valuation will be determined over a six-month average.]
OR
(III) Affiliated Company Test
(1) at least $500,000,000 in global market capitalization;
(2) at least 12 months of operating history (although a company is
not required to have been a separate corporate entity for such period);
and
(3) the company's parent or affiliated company is a listed company
in good standing (as evidenced by written representation from the
company or its financial advisor excluding that portion of the balance
sheet attributable to the new entity); and
(4) the company's parent or affiliated company retains control of
the entity or is under common control with the entity.
In the case of companies listing in connection with an IPO, the
company's underwriter (or, in the case of a spin-off, the parent
company's investment banker or other financial advisor) must provide a
written representation that demonstrates the company's ability to meet
the $500,000,000 global market capitalization requirement based upon
the completion of the offering (or distribution).
``Control'' for purposes of the Affiliated Company Test will mean
[[Page 12928]]
having the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating
and financial policies of the listing company, and will be presumed to
exist where the parent or affiliated company holds 20% or more of the
listing company's voting stock directly or indirectly. Other indicia
that may be taken into account when determining whether control exists
include board representation, participation in policy making processes,
material intercompany transactions, interchange of managerial
personnel, and technological dependency. The Affiliated Company Test is
taken from and intended to be consistent with generally accepted
accounting principles regarding use of the equity method of accounting
for an investment in common stock.
(C) Only adjustments arising from events specifically so indicated
in the company's SEC filing(s) as to both categorization and amount can
and must be made. Any such adjustments apply only in the year in which
the event occurred except with regard to the use of proceeds or
acquisitions and dispositions. Any company for which the Exchange
relies on adjustments in granting clearance must include all relevant
adjusted financial data in its listing application as specified in
Section 702.04, and disclose the use of adjustments by including a
statement in a press release (i) that additional information is
available upon which the NYSE relied to list the company and is
included in the listing application and (ii) that such information is
available to the public upon request. This press release must be issued
concurrently with any listing announcement issued by the company or, if
a listing announcement is not issued, within 30 days from the date the
company lists on the NYSE.
(D) Interested parties should apply the list of adjustments in
accordance with any relevant accounting literature, such as that
published by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (``FASB), the
Accounting Principles Board (``APB''), the Emerging Issues Task Force
(``EITF''), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(``AICPA''), and the SEC. Any literature is intended to guide issuers
and investors regarding the affected adjustment listed. If successor
interpretations (or guidelines) are published with respect to any
particular adjustment, the most recent relevant interpretations (or
guidelines) should be consulted.
[(IV) Affiliated Company Standard
(1) Market capitalization of $500 million or greater (as evidenced
by written representation from the underwriter, company, or its
investment advisor);
(2) Minimum of 12 months of operations (although it is not required
to have been a separate corporate entity for such period);
(3) Parent or affiliated company is a listed company in good
standing (as evidenced by written representation from the company or
its financial advisor excluding that portion of the balance sheet
attributable to the new entity); and
(4) Parent/affiliated company retains control* of the entity or is
under common control* with the entity.
* ``Control'' for these purposes will mean the ability to exercise
significant influence over operating and financial policies, and will
be presumed to exist when the parent involved holds directly or
indirectly 20% or more of the entity's voting stock. Other indicia that
may be taken into account for this purpose include board
representation, participation in policymaking processes, material
intercompany transactions, interchange of managerial personnel, and
technological dependency. This test is taken from and intended to be
consistent with generally accepted accounting principles regarding use
of the equity method of accounting for an investment in common stock.]
* * * * *
802.00 Continued Listing
* * * * *
802.01 Continued Listing Criteria
The Exchange would normally give consideration to the prompt
initiation of suspension and delisting procedures with respect to a
security of either a domestic or non-U.S. issuer when:
802.01A. Distribution Criteria for Capital or Common Stock--
Number of total stockholders (A) is less than--400
OR
Number of total stockholders (A) is less than--1,200 and
Average monthly trading volume is less than--100,000
shares (for most recent 12 months)
OR
Number of publicly-held shares ([A] B) is less than--
600,000([B]C)
(A) The number of beneficial holders of stock held in the name of
Exchange member organizations will be considered in addition to holders
of record.
([A]B ) Shares held by directors, officers, or their immediate
families and other concentrated holdings of 10% or more are excluded in
calculating the number of publicly-held shares.
([B]C) If the unit of trading is less than 100 shares, the
requirement relating to the number of shares publicly held shall be
reduced proportionately.
802.01B Numerical Criteria for Capital or Common Stock
[If] A[a] company that falls below [any of the following] the
criteria applicable to the standard under which it originally listed
will be considered to be below compliance [, it is subject to the
procedures outlined in Paras. 802.02 and 802.03:].
Notwithstanding items (I) to (IV) below, the Exchange will promptly
initiate suspension and delisting procedures with respect to a company
if that company is determined to have average global market
capitalization over a consecutive 30 trading-day period of less than
$25,000,000, regardless of the original standard under which it listed.
A company is not eligible to follow the procedures outlined in Sections
802.02 and 802.03 with respect to this criteria.
(I) A company that qualified to list under the Earnings Test set
out in Section 102.01C(I) or in Section 103.01B(I) will be considered
to be below compliance standards if [(i) A]average global market
capitalization over a consecutive 30 trading-day period is less than
[$50,000,000] $75,000,000 and, at the same time, total stockholders'
equity is less than [$50,000,000] $75,000,000 [(C); or
(ii) Average global market capitalization over a consecutive 30
trading-day period is less than $15,000,000; or]
(II) A company that qualified to list under the Valuation/Revenue
with Cash Flow Test set out in Section 102.01C(II)(a) or Section
103.01B(II)(a) will be considered to be below compliance standards if:
(i) Average global market capitalization over a consecutive 30
trading-day period is less than $250,000,000 and, at the same time,
total revenues are less than $20,000,000 over the last 12 months
(unless the company qualifies as an original listing under one of the
other original listing standards); or
(ii) Average global market capitalization over a consecutive 30
trading-day period is less than $75,000,000.
[(iii) For companies that qualified for original listing under the
``global market capitalization'' standard:]
[[Page 12929]]
(III) A company that qualified to list under the Pure Valuation/
Revenue Test set out in Section 102.01C(II)(b) or Section
103.01B(II)(b) will be considered to be below compliance standards if:
(i) [A]average global market capitalization over a consecutive 30
trading-day period is less than [$500,000,000] $375,000,000 and, at the
same time, total revenues are less than [$20,000,000] $15,000,000 over
the last 12 months (unless the [resultant entity] company qualifies as
an original listing under one of the other original listing standards)
[(D)]; or
(ii) average global market capitalization over a consecutive 30
trading-day period is less than $100,000,000.
(IV) A company that qualified to list under the Affiliated Company
Test set out in Section 102.01C(III) or Section 103.01B(III) will be
considered to be below compliance standards if:
(i) the listed company's parent/affiliated company ceases to
control the listed company, or the listed company's parent/affiliated
company itself falls below the continued listing standards applicable
to the parent/affiliated company, and:
(ii) average global market capitalization over a consecutive 30
trading-day period is less than $75,000,000 and, at the same time,
total stockholders' equity is less than $75,000,000.
When applying the market capitalization test in any of the above
[three] four standards, the Exchange will generally look to the total
common stock outstanding (excluding treasury shares) as well as any
common stock that would be issued upon conversion of another
outstanding equity security. The Exchange deems these securities to be
reflected in market value to such an extent that the security is a
``substantial equivalent'' of common stock. In this regard, the
Exchange will only consider securities (1) publicly traded (or quoted),
or (2) convertible into a publicly traded (or quoted) security. For
partnerships, the Exchange will analyze the creation of the current
capital structure to determine whether it is appropriate to include
other publicly traded securities in the calculation.
[Affiliated Companies--Will not be subject to the $50,000,000
average global market capitalization and stockholders' equity test
unless the parent/affiliated company no longer controls the entity or
such parent/affiliated company itself falls below the continued listing
standards described in this section.]
The Exchange will promptly initiate suspension and delisting
procedures with respect to Funds, REITs and Limited Partnerships [--
will be subject to immediate suspension and delisting procedures] if
the average market capitalization of the entity over 30 consecutive
trading days is below [$15,000,000] $25,000,000 [or (2)]. In addition,
the Exchange will promptly initiate suspension and delisting procedures
with respect to [in the case of] a Fund[,] it ceases to maintain its
closed-end status.[, and in the case of a] The Exchange will promptly
initiate suspension and delisting procedures with respect to a REIT[,]
it fails to maintain its REIT status (unless the resultant entity
qualifies for an original listing as a corporation).
The Exchange will notify the Fund, REIT or limited partnership if
the average market capitalization falls below [$25,000,000] $35,000,000
and will advise the Fund, REIT or limited partnership of the delisting
standard. Funds, REITs and limited partnerships are not [subject]
eligible to follow the procedures outlined in Sections 802.02 and
802.03.
The Exchange will promptly initiate suspension and delisting
procedures with respect to Bonds[--] if:
(i) [(T]the aggregate market value or principal amount of
publicly-held bonds is less than $1,000,000, or
(ii) [(T]the issuer is not able to meet its obligations on
the listed debt securities.
Bonds are not eligible to follow the procedures outlined in
Sections 802.02 and 802.03.
The Exchange will promptly initiate suspension and delisting
procedures with respect to Preferred Stock, Guaranteed Railroad Stock
and Similar Issues[--] if:
(i) []the [A]aggregate market value of publicly-held shares
is less than $2,000,000, or
(ii) []the number of [P]publicly-held shares is less than
100,000.
These types of securities are not eligible to follow the procedures
outlined in Paras. 802.02 and 802.03.
[(C) To be considered in conformity with continued listing
standards pursuant to Paras. 802.02 and 802.03, a company that is
determined to be below this continued listing criterion must do one of
the following:
(i) Reestablish both its market capitalization and its
stockholders' equity to the $50,000,000 level, or
(ii) Achieve average global market capitalization over a
consecutive 30 trading-day period of at least $100,000,000, or
(iii) Achieve average global market capitalization over a
consecutive 30 trading-day period of $60,000,000, with either (x)
stockholders' equity of at least $40,000,000, or (y) an increase in
stockholders' equity of at least $40,000,000 since the company was
notified by the Exchange that it was below continued listing standards.
(D) A company that is determined to be below this continued listing
criterion must reestablish both its market capitalization and its
revenues to be considered in conformity with continued listing
standards pursuant to paras. 802.02 and 802.03.]
802.01C Price Criteria for Capital or Common Stock[--]
A Company will be considered to be below compliance standards if
the [A]average closing price of a security is less than $1.00 over a
consecutive 30-trading-day period [(E)]. [(E)] Once notified, the
company must bring its share price and average share price back above
$1.00 by six months following receipt of the notification. [If this is
the only criteria that makes the company below the Exchange's continued
listing standards, the procedures outlined in Paras. 802.02 and 802.03
do not apply.] A company is not eligible to follow the procedures
outlined in Paras. 802.02 and 802.03 with respect to this criteria.
* * * * *
802.00 Continued Listing
802.02 Evaluation and Follow-Up Procedures for Domestic Companies
The following procedures shall be applied by the Exchange to
domestic companies [which] that are identified as being below the
Exchange's continued listing criteria. Notwithstanding the above, when
the Exchange deems it necessary for the protection of investors,
trading in any security can be suspended immediately, and application
made to the SEC to delist the security.
Once the Exchange identifies, through internal reviews or notice (a
press release, news story, company communication, etc.), a company as
being below the continued listing criteria set forth in Section 802.01(
and not able to otherwise qualify under an original listing standard),
the Exchange will notify the company by letter of its status within 10
business days. This letter will also provide the company with an
opportunity to provide the Exchange with a plan (the ``Plan'') advising
the Exchange of definitive action the company has taken, or is taking,
that would bring it into conformity with continued listing standards
within 18 months of receipt of the letter.
[[Page 12930]]
Within 10 business days after receipt of the letter, the company
must contact the Exchange to confirm receipt of notification, discuss
any possible financial data of which the Exchange may be unaware, and
indicate whether or not it plans to present a Plan; otherwise,
suspension and delisting procedures will commence. If the company
submits a Plan, it must identify specific quarterly milestones against
which the Exchange will evaluate the company's progress.
The company has 45 days from the receipt of the letter to submit
its Plan to the Exchange for review; otherwise, suspension and
delisting procedures will commence. If the company is determined to be
below the criteria listed in Section 802.01B[(i) or 802.01B(iii)], the
Plan it presents must demonstrate how it will return to compliance with
the applicable continued listing standard by the end of the Plan period
[reestablish both its market capitalization and stockholders' equity
(or revenues, as applicable, to the levels specified in such clauses].
In any event, all companies submitting a Plan must include
quarterly financial projections, details related to any strategic
initiatives the company plans to complete, and market performance
support. Exchange staff will evaluate the Plan, including any
additional documentation that supports the Plan, and make a
determination as to whether the company has made a reasonable
demonstration in the Plan of an ability to come into conformity with
the relevant standard(s) within 18 months. The Exchange will make such
determination within 45 days of receipt of the proposed Plan, and will
promptly notify the company of its determination in writing.
The company also has 45 days from receipt of the letter to issue a
press release disclosing the fact that it has fallen below the
continued listing standards of the Exchange. If the company fails to
issue this press release during the allotted 45 days, the Exchange will
issue the requisite press release.
If the Exchange does not accept the Plan, the Exchange will
promptly initiate suspension and delisting procedures and issue a press
release disclosing the forthcoming suspension and application to the
SEC [for] to delist[ing of] the company's securities.
If the Exchange accepts the Plan, the Exchange will review the
company on a quarterly basis for compliance with the Plan. If the
company fails to meet the material aspects of the Plan or any of the
quarterly milestones, the Exchange will review the circumstances and
variance, and determine whether such variance warrants commencement of
suspension and delisting procedures. Should the Exchange determine to
proceed with suspension and delisting procedures, it may do so
regardless of the company's continued listing status at that time. The
Exchange will deem the Plan period over prior to the end of the 18
months if a company is able to demonstrate returning to compliance with
the applicable continued listing standards, or achieving the ability to
qualify under an original listing standard, for a period of two
consecutive quarters. [This early Plan termination will not be
available to a company based on satisfying the alternative criteria
specified in clauses (ii) or (iii) of footnote C to Para. 802.01B.] In
any event, if the company does not meet continued listing standards
[(including the criteria specified in footnote C to Section 802.01B, if
applicable)] at the end of the 18-month period, the Exchange promptly
will initiate suspension and delisting procedures.
If the company, within twelve months of the end of the Plan period
[(including any early termination of the Plan period under the
procedures described above)], is again determined to be below continued
listing standards, the Exchange will examine the relationship between
the two incidents of falling below continued listing standards and re-
evaluate the company's method of financial recovery from the first
incident. It will then take appropriate action, which, depending upon
the circumstances, may include truncating the procedures described
above or immediately initiating suspension and delisting procedures.
802.03 Continued Listing
Evaluation and Follow-up Procedures for Non-U.S. Companies
The following procedures shall be applied by the Exchange to non-
U.S. companies [who] that are identified as being below the Exchange's
continued listing criteria. Notwithstanding the above, when the
Exchange deems it necessary for the protection of the investors,
trading in any security can be suspended immediately, and application
made to the SEC to delist the security. Once the Exchange identifies,
through internal reviews or notice (a press release, news story,
company communication, etc.), a company as being below the continued
listing criteria set forth in Section 802.01(and not able to otherwise
qualify under an original listing standard), the Exchange will notify
the company by letter of its status within 10 business days. This
letter will also provide the company with an opportunity to provide the
Exchange with a plan (the ``Plan'') advising the Exchange of definitive
action the company has taken, or is taking, that would bring it into
conformity with the standards within 18 month of receipt of the letter.
Within 30 business days after receipt of the letter, the company must
contact the Exchange to confirm receipt of notification, discuss any
possible financial data of which the Exchange may be unaware, and
indicate whether or not it plans to present a Plan; otherwise,
suspension and delisting procedures will commence. If the company
submits a Plan, it must identify specific semi-annual milestones
against which the Exchange will evaluate the company's progress.
The company has 90 days from the receipt of the letter to submit
its Plan to the Exchange for review; otherwise, suspension and
delisting procedures will commence. If the company is determined to be
below the criteria listed in Section 802.01B [(i) or 802.01B(iii)], the
Plan it presents must demonstrate how it will return to compliance with
the applicable continued listing standard by the end of the Plan period
[reestablish both its market capitalization and stockholders' equity
(or revenues, as applicable, to the levels specified in such clauses].
In any event, all companies submitting a Plan must include
quarterly financial projections, details related to any strategic
initiatives the company plans to complete, and market performance
support. Exchange staff will evaluate the Plan, including any
additional documentation that supports the Plan, and make a
determination as to whether the company has made a reasonable
demonstration in the Plan of an ability to come into conformity with
the relevant standard(s) within 18 months. The Exchange will make such
determination within 45 days of receipt of the proposed Plan, and will
promptly notify the company of its determination in writing.
The company also has 90 days from receipt of the letter to issue
press release disclosing the fact that it has fallen below the
continued listing standards of the Exchange. If the company fails to
issue this press release during the allotted 90 days, the Exchange will
issue the requisite press release.
If the Exchange does not accept the Plan, the Exchange will
promptly initiate suspension and delisting procedures and issue a press
release disclosing the forthcoming suspension and application to the
SEC to delist[ing of] the company's securities.
[[Page 12931]]
If the Exchange accepts the Plan, the Exchange will review the
company on a semi-annual basis for compliance with the Plan. If the
company fails to meet the material aspects of the Plan or any of the
semi-annual milestones, the Exchange will review the circumstances and
variance, and determine whether such variance warrants commencement of
suspension and delisting procedures. Should the Exchange determine to
proceed with suspension and delisting procedures, it may do so
regardless of the company's continued listing status at that time. The
Exchange will deem the Plan period over prior to the end of the 18
months if a company is able to demonstrate returning to compliance with
the applicable continued listing standards, or achieving the ability to
qualify under an original listing standard, for a period of two
consecutive quarters. [This early Plan termination will not be
available to a company based on satisfying the alternative criteria
specified in clauses (ii) or (iii) of footnote C to Para. 802.01B.] In
any event, the Exchange will promptly initiate suspension and delisting
procedures with respect to [if the] a company that does not meet the
continued listing standards [(including the criteria specified in
footnote C to Para. 802.01B, if applicable)] at the end of the 18-month
period[, the Exchange promptly will initiate suspension and delisting
procedures.]
If the company, within twelve months of the end of the Plan period
[(including any early termination of the Plan period under the
procedures described above)], is again determined to be below continued
listing standards, the Exchange will examine the relationship between
the two incidents of falling below continued listing standards and re-
evaluate the company's method of financial recovery from the first
incident. It will then take appropriate action, which, depending upon
the circumstances, may include truncating the procedures described
above or immediately initiating suspension and delisting procedures.
* * * * *
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing amendments to certain of its minimum
numerical standards for the listing and continued listing of equity
securities on the NYSE. On January 29, 2004, the Commission approved
these proposed amendments sought by the NYSE on a pilot program basis
(the ``Pilot Program'').\12\ The Pilot Program provided a transition
period for companies that were below compliance under the previous
continued listing standards at the time the Pilot Program was approved,
granting them an opportunity to present an additional business plan
advising the Exchange of definitive action the company has taken, or is
taking, that would bring the company into conformity with the Pilot
Program requirements within 12 months of the end of their previous
plan. No transition period was provided, however, for companies that
were in compliance with the previous standards but not in compliance
with the Pilot Program standards at the time the Pilot Program was
approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49154 (January 29,
2004), 69 FR 5633 (February 5, 2004) (approving File No. SR-NYSE-
2003-43).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Due to the fact that the Exchange requested the Commission approve
the Pilot Program on an accelerated basis, there was no opportunity for
listed companies to review and comment on the Pilot Program
requirements prior to the date compliance was required. The NYSE notes
that a number of the listed companies that did not comply with the
Pilot Program standards as of the date of approval expressed
significant dismay at the automatic application of the new continued
listing standards.\13\ In order to address these concerns, the Exchange
suspended the portions of the Pilot Program relating to the continued
listing standards of Section 802.01B of the NYSE's Listed Company
Manual.\14\ In File No. SR-NYSE-2004-15, the Exchange noted its
intention to publish the requirements of the Pilot Program relating to
Section 802.01B for public comment on a non-accelerated timeframe.\15\
File No. SR-NYSE-2004-15 did not, however, amend the Pilot Program with
respect to Sections 102.01C and 103.01B of the NYSE's Listed Company
Manual concerning original minimum listing standards or the Pilot
Program's non-substantive change to the language of Section
802.01C.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See letters from Kenneth A. Hoogstra, von Briesen & Roper,
s.c., to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Commission, dated February 25,
2004, and W. Randy Eaddy, Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, to Jonathan G.
Katz, Secretary, Commission, dated March 11, 2004, (commenting on
File No. SR-NYSE-2003-43).
\14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49443 (March 18,
2004), 69 FR 13929 (March 24, 2004) (File No. SR-NYSE-2004-15).
\15\ See id.
\16\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this filing, File No. SR-NYSE-2004-20, the Exchange now seeks
permanent approval for the Pilot Program currently in effect with
respect to the Exchange's original minimum listing standards and
approval of the continued minimum listing standards as initially
proposed in File No. SR-NYSE-2003-43. File No. SR-NYSE-2004-20, as
amended, by Amendment No. 1 was published in the Federal Register on
July 2, 2004.\17\ The Exchange also seeks approval for continued
minimum listing standards, with changes to that proposed in File No.
SR-NYSE-2003-43 that are responsive to public comments submitted to the
Commission. The Exchange represents that it maintains an ongoing dialog
with knowledgeable practitioners at investment banks, broker-dealers,
and venture capital firms, and adjusts its listing standards
periodically to ensure that the standards recognize and reflect current
market conditions and to allow the Exchange to continue to attract
quality companies. The Exchange represents, furthermore, that such
changes are proposed only after detailed analysis by Exchange staff of
how the proposed standards would affect the NYSE list. The NYSE asserts
that the proposed amendments will strengthen certain aspects of the
minimum original and continued listing standards, while modestly easing
the pre-Pilot Program ``Market-Cap/Revenue Test'' to enable the NYSE to
list somewhat younger companies that still meet substantial
quantitative thresholds over their operating history. According to the
NYSE, Exchange staff monitored the modest number of companies over the
last two years that would have met the ``Market-Cap/Revenue Test'' as
the Exchange proposes to modify it and found that those companies have
performed to a standard that would be appropriate for inclusion on the
NYSE list. The Exchange represents that its standard in this respect
remains far higher than any other U.S. marketplace.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 12932]]
Prior to the Pilot Program, Section 102.01C of the Listed Company
Manual provided that a company must meet one of four specified
financial standards in order to qualify to have its equity securities
listed. The Exchange is proposing permanent approval of amendments to
three of these four standards that have been in effect under the Pilot
Program.\18\ The Exchange is also proposing permanent approval of
amendments to Section 103.01B(III), which provides a corresponding
numerical standard applicable to international companies and have also
been in effect under the Pilot Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ The ``Earnings Test,'' the ``Valuation/Revenue Test''
(incorporating in one section the pre-Pilot Program Valuation/
Revenue with Cash Flow Test and in another section the Pure
Valuation/Revenue Test), or the ``Affiliated Company Test.'' See
supra note 11 (approving File No. SR-NYSE-2003-43).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prior to the Pilot Program, Section 102.01C(I) required that a
company demonstrate pre-tax earnings of $6.5 million in aggregate for
the last three fiscal years, with either a minimum of: (a) $2.5 million
in earnings in the most recent fiscal year and $2 million in each of
the preceding two years; or (b) $4.5 million in earnings in the most
recent fiscal year, with positive earnings in each of the preceding two
years. Pursuant to the Pilot Program, the ``Earnings Test'' requires
that companies demonstrate pre-tax earnings of $10 million in aggregate
for the last three fiscal years. It also requires that the company
demonstrate positive results in all three of the years tested with a
minimum of $2.0 million in earnings in each of the preceding two years.
The Exchange believes that these changes strengthen the ``Earnings
Test'' standard and also simplify it by eliminating the current two-
tiered structure.
Prior to the Pilot Program, Section 102.01C(II) of the Listed
Company Manual required that a company demonstrate market
capitalization of at least $500 million and revenues of at least $100
million over the most recent 12-month period. Provided that these
thresholds were met, a company with operating cash flows of at least
$25 million in aggregate for the last three fiscal years and positive
amounts in each of the three fiscal years would have qualified for
listing. Section 102.01C(III) required that an issuer demonstrate (a)
market capitalization of at least $1 billion and (b) revenues of at
least $100 million in the most recent fiscal year. Because both of
these tests are valuation and revenue-based, the Exchange now seeks
permanent approval to consolidate them into one test with two
alternative subsections. One of the sections of the current Pilot
Program, the ``Valuation/Revenue Test,'' incorporates the pre-Pilot
Program requirements of Section 102.01C(II) as the ``Valuation/Revenue
with Cash Flow Test'' with no change to the previous thresholds. The
other section incorporates the pre-Pilot Program requirements of
Section 102.01C(III) as the ``Pure Valuation/Revenue Test.'' In
addition, the Exchange is proposing to permanently approve the
amendments to the thresholds of Section 102.01C(III) that require that
companies demonstrate (a) market capitalization of at least $750
million and (b) revenues of at least $75 million during the most recent
fiscal year. As noted above, the Exchange represents that its staff has
monitored the modest number of companies over the last two years that
would have met the Pilot Program's ``Pure Valuation/Revenue Test'' and
found that those companies performed to a standard that is appropriate
for inclusion on the NYSE list.
The Exchange is also proposing permanent approval of corresponding
restructuring changes to Section 103.01B of the Listed Company Manual,
which sets out minimum numerical standards for non-U.S. issuers. The
Exchange is also proposing permanent approval of changes to the numeric
thresholds of Section 103.01B(III) in accordance with changes to
Section 102.01C(III).
In addition, the Exchange seeks permanent approval of its suspended
Pilot Program restructuring and amending the numerical continued
listing standards. Section 802.01B of the Listed Company Manual
currently applies to companies that fall below any of the following
criteria: (i) Average global market capitalization over a consecutive
30 trading-day period is less than $50 million and total stockholders'
equity is less than $50 million; or (ii) average global market
capitalization over a consecutive 30-trading-day period is less than
$15 million; or (iii) for companies that qualified for original listing
under the ``global market capitalization'' standard, (a) average global
market capitalization over a consecutive 30 trading-day period is less
than $500 million and total revenues are less than $20 million over the
last 12 months (unless the resultant entity qualifies as an original
listing under one of the other original listing standards), or (b)
average global market capitalization over a consecutive 30 trading-day
period is less than $100 million.
The Exchange proposes to amend these thresholds and to specifically
relate the continued listing standards of Section 802.01B of the Listed
Company Manual to the original listing standards of Section 102.01C
used to qualify a company for listing. In addition, the Exchange
proposes to add a minimum continued listing standard applicable to all
companies regardless of original listing standard. This standard would
require that all companies maintain average global market
capitalization over a consecutive 30 trading-day period of at least
$25,000,000 or be subject to suspension and delisting (the ``Minimum
Continued Listing Standard'').\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ This requirement is in substance identical to the proposal
in File No. SR-NYSE-2003-43, but it restates the standard in a
manner the Exchange believes is more readily understandable. In a
substantive change from the current provisions and from the
proposals as published for public comment, companies that fall below
this minimum threshold would not be afforded the opportunity to
submit a plan and ``cure'' their noncompliance over a plan period.
In addition, companies that list under the Affiliated Company Test
would be subject to the proposed $25,000,000 threshold, regardless
of the status of their parent company.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Companies that list under the Pilot Program ``Earnings Test'' or
its predecessor test will be considered to be below compliance if
average global market capitalization over a consecutive 30 trading-day
period is less than $75,000,000 and, at the same time, total
stockholders' equity is less than $75,000,000. This level has been
increased in the proposal to reflect marketplace expectations of those
companies deemed suitable for continued listing. The current alternate
threshold for the Earnings Test that resulted in a company being below
compliance if average global market capitalization over a consecutive
30 trading-day period is less than $15,000,000 is proposed to be
eliminated as a result of the proposed $25,000,000 Minimum Continued
Listing Standard.
Issuers that list under the Pilot Program's ``Valuation/Revenue
with Cash Flow Test'' or its predecessor test would be considered to be
below compliance standards if: (a) Average global market capitalization
over a consecutive 30 trading-day period is less than $250 million and,
at the same time, total revenues are less than $20 million over the
last 12 months (unless the company qualifies as an original listing
under one of the other original listing standards); \20\ or (b) average
global market capitalization over a consecutive 30 trading-day period
is less than $75 million.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ These levels are lower than the existing ``global market
capitalization'' standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issuers that list under the Pilot Program's ``Pure Valuation/
Revenue Test'' or its predecessor test would be
[[Page 12933]]
considered to be below compliance standards if: (a) Average global
market capitalization over a consecutive 30 trading-day period is less
than $375 million and, at the same time, total revenues are less than
$15 million over the last 12 months (unless the company qualifies as an
original listing under one of the other original listing standards); or
(b) average global market capitalization over a consecutive 30 trading-
day period is less than $100 million.
The Exchange also proposes to clarify that, in circumstances where
a listed company's parent or affiliated company no longer controls the
listed company or such listed company's parent or affiliated company
falls below the continued listing standards applicable to the parent or
affiliated company, the continued listing standards applicable to the
Pilot Program's ``Earnings Test'' would apply to companies that
originally listed under the Affiliated Company Standard. Amendments are
also proposed to make clear that companies that list under the
Affiliated Company Standard are subject to the Minimum Continued
Listing Standard, regardless of the status of the listed company's
parent. In addition, the Exchange proposes to increase the continued
listing criteria for closed-end funds, REITs, and limited partnerships
from $15 million to $25 million with a corresponding increase to the
notification threshold from $25 million to $35 million.
Companies that fall below the foregoing minimum standards could be
permitted a period of time to return to compliance, in accordance with
the procedures specified in Sections 802.02 and 802.03 of the Listed
Company Manual. As a general matter, companies must reestablish the
level of market capitalization (and, if applicable, shareholder's
equity) specified in the continued listing standard below which the
company fell. However, with respect to the current requirements of
Section 802.01B(I) that a company reestablish both its market
capitalization and its stockholders' equity to the $50 million level,
footnote (C) to Section 802.01B provides several alternatives.
Currently, the footnote specifies that, to return to conformity, a
company must do one of the following: (a) Reestablish both its market
capitalization and its stockholders' equity to the $50 million level;
(b) achieve average global market capitalization over a consecutive 30-
trading-day period of at least $100 million; or (c) achieve average
global market capitalization over a consecutive 30-trading-day period
of $60 million, with either (x) stockholders' equity of at least $40
million, or (y) an increase in stockholders' equity of at least $40
million, since the company was notified by the Exchange that it was
below continued listing standards. Likewise, with respect to the
current requirements of Section 802.01B(iii) relating to companies that
listed under the current global market capitalization standard,
footnote (D) states that companies must reestablish both market
capitalization and revenues in conformity with continued listing
standards.
In a change from the proposals as originally published for comment,
the Exchange proposes to eliminate footnotes (C) and (D) to Section
802.01B of the Listed Company Manual, and, instead pr