Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 12491-12492 [05-4939]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 48 / Monday, March 14, 2005 / Notices
• The respondent falsified the text
describing the results in Figure 20
(‘‘Inhibition of c-fos luciferase activity
in S49 T cells transiently transfected
with pIRES2-RIIb-EGFP and treated
with 8-Cl-cAMP’’) in application 1 R01
AI46526–01A2 (p. 27), by falsely
reporting N = 4, P less than 0.002, when
the experiment had been performed
only one time at the time that the
application was submitted.
PHS also concluded that the
respondent further demonstrated a lack
of present responsibility as a Principal
Investigator by submitting NIH grant
proposals with additional unsupported
experimental results:
• The pedigree and data for the
family reported in grant application 2
R01 AR39501–12 and for Family 1 in
grant application 2 R01 AR39501–12A1
are incorrect and the data pertaining to
this family that Dr. Kammer
subsequently provided to WFU after the
inquiry were not the data reported in
the applications. Dr. Kammer stated that
he did not recall who in his laboratory
gave him this pedigree. ORI noted that
the actual PKA data for the ‘‘proof-ofprinciple’’ family, while suggesting that
low PKA values may be hereditary (the
presence of low PKA–I values in three
generations), do not support the claims
of the fabricated and mixed up pedigree
and data that show that low PKA–I
values were associated with Systematic
Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) (application
2R01 AR39501–12).
• In application, R01 AI39501–12A1,
the following unsupported statement
was also included: ‘‘In both normal and
disease controls, all T cells express
CD59+ and there is no significant
difference in its cell surface expression
on CD4+, CD45RA+, CD4+, CD45RO+,
CD8+, CD45RA+, CD8+, CD45RO+
subsets (n=4 each control group; data
not shown).’’ No data could be
produced to support the information in
the grant application about these control
experiments.
Dr. Kammer has entered into a
Voluntary Exclusion Agreement
(Agreement ) in which he has
voluntarily agreed for a period of three
(3) years, beginning on February 15,
2005:
(1) To exclude himself from serving in
any advisory capacity to PHS including
but not limited to service on any PHS
advisory committee, board, and/or peer
review committee, or as a consultant,
and
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:31 Mar 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
(2) To exclude himself from any
contracting or subcontracting with any
agency of the United States Government
and from eligibility or involvement in
nonprocurement programs of the United
States Government referred to as
‘‘covered transactions’’ as defined in the
debarment regulations at 45 CFR part
76. This voluntary exclusion precludes
the respondent from receiving Federal
research, research training, or other
research related funds from the Federal
Government for three (3) years, but shall
not apply to the respondent’s
participation in a Federal health care
program as defined in section 1128B(f)
of the Social Security Act and shall not
apply to Federal funds used solely for
purposes of teaching or training medical
students, residents, or fellows in clinical
medical matters.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Director, Division of Investigative
Oversight, Office of Research Integrity,
1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 750,
Rockville, MD 20852; (301) 443–5330.
Chris B. Pascal,
Director, Office of Research Integrity.
[FR Doc. 05–4957 Filed 3–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Proposed Projects:
Title: Evaluation of the Early Head
Start Enhanced Home Visiting Pilot
Project.
OMB No.: New Collection.
Description: The Head Start
Reauthorization Act of 1994 established
a special initiative creating funding for
services for families with infants and
toddlers. In response, the
Administration on Children, Youth and
Families (ACYF) within the
Administration for Children and
Families (ACF) developed the Early
Head Start program. Since its inception,
Early Head Start has expanded to
include more than 700 programs and
70,000 families enrolled nationwide.
The program is designed to produce
outcome sin four domains: (1) Child
development, (2) family development,
(3) staff development and (4)
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12491
community development. The Head
Start Bureau has given programs a
mandate to support the quality of all
settings where children receive care by
providing high-quality services and
supporting parents and child care
providers in caring for their young
children.
In keeping with this mandate, the
Head Start Bureau recently funded 24
Early Head Start programs to participate
in the Enhanced Home Visiting Pilot
Project. The goal of the pilot project is
to develop program models for
supporting relatives and neighbors and
who care for Early Head Start children
in acquiring the knowledge, skills and
resources they need to support
children’s healthy development.
The Enhanced Home Visiting Pilot
Project evaluation will collect and
disseminate information about the
program models and service delivery
strategies developed by the pilot sites,
as well as the characteristics and needs
of participating children, families and
caregivers. The evaluation will collect
and analyze information from three
main sources: (1) Interviews with staff
and focus groups with parents and
caregivers to be conducted during two
rounds of visits to pilot programs (in
spring 2005 and 2006), (2) a program
recordkeeping system for tracking
services to be maintained by the pilot
sites and (3) observational assessments
of the quality of the caregiving
environment and the interactions
between children and caregivers to be
conducted in spring 2006. All datacollection instruments have been
designed to minimize the burden on
respondents by minimizing the time
required to respond. Participation in the
study is voluntary.
The results of the research will be
used by the Head Start Bureau and ACF
to identify and disseminate information
about promising program models and
service delivery strategies and lessons
learned from the experiences of the pilot
programs.
Respondent: Early Head Starts
directors, coordinators, specialists and
home visitors; staff from other
community service providers; parents of
Early Head Start children; and neighbor
and relative caregivers of Early Head
Start children.
Annual Burden Estimates
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
12492
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 48 / Monday, March 14, 2005 / Notices
ESTIMATED RESPONSE BURDEN FOR RESPONDENTS FOR THE ENHANCED HOME VISITING PILOT EVALUATION
Number of
respondents
Instrument
Site Visit Protocols (2005):
Director Protocol .......................................................................................
Coordinator/Specialist Protocol ................................................................
Community Partner Protocol ....................................................................
Home Visitor Protocol ...............................................................................
Parent Protocol .........................................................................................
Caregiver Protocol ....................................................................................
Case Review Protocol ..............................................................................
Recordkeeping System (2005) .................................................................
Number of
responses
per
respondent
Average
burden per
response
(hours)
Annual
burden
(hours)
24
24
24
48
192
192
48
24
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
a27
3.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
3.0
b2.0
72.0
36.0
36.0
72.0
288.0
288.0
144.0
1,296.0
Total for 2005 ....................................................................................
Site Visit Protocols (2006):
Director Telephone Protocol .....................................................................
Director Protocol .......................................................................................
Coordinator/Specialist Protocol ................................................................
Community Partner Protocol ....................................................................
Home Visitor Protocol ...............................................................................
Parent Protocol .........................................................................................
Case Review Protocol ..............................................................................
Recordkeeping System (2006) .................................................................
Caregiver Observations (2006) ................................................................
........................
........................
........................
2,232.00
24
12
12
12
24
96
24
24
96
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
a27
1
1.0
3.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
3.0
b1.0
2.5
24.0
36.0
18.0
18.0
36.0
144.0
72.0
648.0
240.0
Total for 2006 ....................................................................................
........................
........................
........................
1,236.0
Total for 2005 and 2006 ....................................................................
........................
........................
........................
1,734.0
a Average
b Based
expected number of children to be enrolled in the pilot per site. Expected enrollment ranges from 7 to 60 across the 24 sites.
on an estimated burden of 10 minutes per child per month.
Additional Information:
Copies of the proposed collection may
be obtained by writing to the
Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Administration,
Office of Information Services, 370
L’Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington,
DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance
Officer. All requests should be
identified by the title of the information
collection. E-mail address:
grjohnson@acf.hhs.gov.
OMB Comment:
OMB is required to make a decision
concerning the collection of information
between 30 and 60 days after
publication of this document in the
Federal Register. Therefore, a comment
is best assured of having its full effect
if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
directly to the following: Office of
Management and Budget, Paperwork
Reduction Project, Attn: Desk Officer for
ACF; e-mail address:
Katherine_T._Astrich@omb.eop.gov.
Dated: March 4, 2005.
Robert Stargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–4939 Filed 3–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–M
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:31 Mar 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences; Notice of Closed
Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice
is hereby given of a meeting of the
Board of Scientific Counselors, NIEHS.
The meeting will be open to the
public as indicated below, with
attendance limited to space available.
Individuals who plan to attend and
need special assistance, such as sign
language interpretation or other
reasonable accommodations, should
notify the Contact Person listed below
in advance of the meeting.
The meetings will be closed to the
public as indicted below in accordance
with the provisions set forth in section
552b(c)(6) title 5 U.S.C., as amended for
the review, discussion, and evaluation
of individual intramural programs and
projects conducted by the National
Institute of Environmental Health
Sciences, including consideration of
personal qualifications and
performance, and the competence of
individual investigators, the disclosure
of which would constitute a clearly
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
unwarranted invasion of personal
privacy.
Name of Committee: Board of Scientific
Counselors, NIEHS.
Date: April 3–5, 2005.
Closed: April 3, 2005, 8 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate
programmatic and personnel issues.
Place: Doubletree Guest Suites, 2515
Meridian Parkway, Research Triangle Park,
NC 27713.
Open: April 4, 2005, 8:30 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.
Agenda: An overview of the organization
and conduct of research in the Epidemiology
Branch.
Place: Building 101 Rodbell Auditorium,
111 T. W. Alexander Drive, Research
Triangle Park, NC 27709.
Closed: April 5, 2005, 8 a.m. to
adjournment.
Agenda: To review and evaluate
Epidemiology Branch.
Place: Building 101 Rodbell Auditorium,
111 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle
Park, NC 27709.
Contact Person: Lutz Birnbaumer,
Scientific Director, Division of Intramural
Research, National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences, National Institutes of
Health, MD A2–09, P.O. Box 12233, Research
Triangle Park, NC 17709, 919/541–3205.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.115, Biometry and Risk
Estimation–Health Risks from Environmental
Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste
Worker Health and Safety Training; 93.143,
NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances–
Basic Research and Education; 93.894,
Resources and Manpower Development in
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 48 (Monday, March 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12491-12492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4939]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Proposed Projects:
Title: Evaluation of the Early Head Start Enhanced Home Visiting
Pilot Project.
OMB No.: New Collection.
Description: The Head Start Reauthorization Act of 1994 established
a special initiative creating funding for services for families with
infants and toddlers. In response, the Administration on Children,
Youth and Families (ACYF) within the Administration for Children and
Families (ACF) developed the Early Head Start program. Since its
inception, Early Head Start has expanded to include more than 700
programs and 70,000 families enrolled nationwide. The program is
designed to produce outcome sin four domains: (1) Child development,
(2) family development, (3) staff development and (4) community
development. The Head Start Bureau has given programs a mandate to
support the quality of all settings where children receive care by
providing high-quality services and supporting parents and child care
providers in caring for their young children.
In keeping with this mandate, the Head Start Bureau recently funded
24 Early Head Start programs to participate in the Enhanced Home
Visiting Pilot Project. The goal of the pilot project is to develop
program models for supporting relatives and neighbors and who care for
Early Head Start children in acquiring the knowledge, skills and
resources they need to support children's healthy development.
The Enhanced Home Visiting Pilot Project evaluation will collect
and disseminate information about the program models and service
delivery strategies developed by the pilot sites, as well as the
characteristics and needs of participating children, families and
caregivers. The evaluation will collect and analyze information from
three main sources: (1) Interviews with staff and focus groups with
parents and caregivers to be conducted during two rounds of visits to
pilot programs (in spring 2005 and 2006), (2) a program recordkeeping
system for tracking services to be maintained by the pilot sites and
(3) observational assessments of the quality of the caregiving
environment and the interactions between children and caregivers to be
conducted in spring 2006. All data-collection instruments have been
designed to minimize the burden on respondents by minimizing the time
required to respond. Participation in the study is voluntary.
The results of the research will be used by the Head Start Bureau
and ACF to identify and disseminate information about promising program
models and service delivery strategies and lessons learned from the
experiences of the pilot programs.
Respondent: Early Head Starts directors, coordinators, specialists
and home visitors; staff from other community service providers;
parents of Early Head Start children; and neighbor and relative
caregivers of Early Head Start children.
Annual Burden Estimates
[[Page 12492]]
Estimated Response Burden for Respondents for the Enhanced Home Visiting Pilot Evaluation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Number of Number of burden per Annual burden
Instrument respondents responses per response (hours)
respondent (hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site Visit Protocols (2005):
Director Protocol........................... 24 1 3.0 72.0
Coordinator/Specialist Protocol............. 24 1 1.5 36.0
Community Partner Protocol.................. 24 1 1.5 36.0
Home Visitor Protocol....................... 48 1 1.5 72.0
Parent Protocol............................. 192 1 1.5 288.0
Caregiver Protocol.......................... 192 1 1.5 288.0
Case Review Protocol........................ 48 1 3.0 144.0
Recordkeeping System (2005)................. 24 a27 b2.0 1,296.0
---------------
Total for 2005.......................... .............. .............. .............. 2,232.00
Site Visit Protocols (2006):
Director Telephone Protocol................. 24 1 1.0 24.0
Director Protocol........................... 12 1 3.0 36.0
Coordinator/Specialist Protocol............. 12 1 1.5 18.0
Community Partner Protocol.................. 12 1 1.5 18.0
Home Visitor Protocol....................... 24 1 1.5 36.0
Parent Protocol............................. 96 1 1.5 144.0
Case Review Protocol........................ 24 1 3.0 72.0
Recordkeeping System (2006)................. 24 a27 b1.0 648.0
Caregiver Observations (2006)............... 96 1 2.5 240.0
---------------
Total for 2006.......................... .............. .............. .............. 1,236.0
---------------
Total for 2005 and 2006................. .............. .............. .............. 1,734.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a Average expected number of children to be enrolled in the pilot per site. Expected enrollment ranges from 7 to
60 across the 24 sites.
b Based on an estimated burden of 10 minutes per child per month.
Additional Information:
Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to the
Administration for Children and Families, Office of Administration,
Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW.,
Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. All requests
should be identified by the title of the information collection. E-mail
address: grjohnson@acf.hhs.gov.
OMB Comment:
OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of
information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document
in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best assured of having
its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication.
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of
Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Attn: Desk Officer
for ACF; e-mail address: Katherine_T._Astrich@omb.eop.gov.
Dated: March 4, 2005.
Robert Stargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-4939 Filed 3-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M