Klipstand Manufacturing Company, Inc., Westfield, MA; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration, 11702 [E5-988]

Download as PDF 11702 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Notices At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. New information shows that worker separations occurred involving employees of the Dayton, Ohio facility of Hewitt Soap Works, Inc., a subsidiary of Bradford Soap Works, Inc. located in Peapack, New Jersey and Atlanta, Georgia. Mr. Thomas O’Callaghan and Mr. Larry Southard provided sales support services for the production of bar soap at the Dayton, Ohio location of the subject firm. Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include employees of the Dayton, Ohio facility of Hewitt Soap Works, Inc., located in Peapack, New Jersey and Atlanta, Georgia. Since workers of the Dayton, Ohio location of the subject firm were certified eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance, the Department is extending this eligibility to Mr. Thomas O’Callaghan in Peapack, New Jersey and Mr. Larry Southard in Atlanta, Georgia. The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers of Hewitt Soap Works, Inc., a subsidiary of Bradford Soap Works, Inc., Dayton, Ohio, who were adversely affected by increased imports. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–55,298 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of Hewitt Soap Works, Inc., a subsidiary of Bradford Soap Works, Inc., Dayton, Ohio (TA–W–55,298), including employees of Hewitt Soap Works, Inc., a subsidiary of Bradford Soap Works, Inc., Dayton, Ohio, located in Peapack, New Jersey (TA–W–55,298A) and Atlanta, Georgia (TA– W–55,298B), who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after June 22, 2003, through August 25, 2006, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed at Washington, DC this 23rd day of February 2005. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–991 Filed 3–8–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P VerDate jul<14>2003 18:06 Mar 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–56,074] Klipstand Manufacturing Company, Inc., Westfield, MA; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Klipstand Manufacturing Company, Inc., Westfield, Massachusetts. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department’s determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued. TA–W–56,074; Klipstand Manufacturing Company, Inc., Westfield, Massachusetts (February 15, 2005). Signed at Washington, DC this 16th day of February 2005. Linda G. Poole, Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–988 Filed 3–8–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA–W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA–W) number issued during the periods of February 2005. In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a certification of eligibility to apply for directly-impacted (primary) worker adjustment assistance to be issued, each of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. There has been a shift in production by such workers’ firm or subdivision to a foreign county of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and C. One of the following must be satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made and a certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance as an adversely affected secondary group to be issued, each of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM 09MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 11702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-988]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-56,074]


Klipstand Manufacturing Company, Inc., Westfield, MA; Dismissal 
of Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Klipstand Manufacturing Company, 
Inc., Westfield, Massachusetts. The application contained no new 
substantial information which would bear importantly on the 
Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was 
issued.

TA-W-56,074; Klipstand Manufacturing Company, Inc., Westfield, 
Massachusetts (February 15, 2005).

    Signed at Washington, DC this 16th day of February 2005.
Linda G. Poole,
Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-988 Filed 3-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P