Klipstand Manufacturing Company, Inc., Westfield, MA; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration, 11702 [E5-988]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
11702
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Notices
At the request of the State agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. New
information shows that worker
separations occurred involving
employees of the Dayton, Ohio facility
of Hewitt Soap Works, Inc., a subsidiary
of Bradford Soap Works, Inc. located in
Peapack, New Jersey and Atlanta,
Georgia.
Mr. Thomas O’Callaghan and Mr.
Larry Southard provided sales support
services for the production of bar soap
at the Dayton, Ohio location of the
subject firm.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include employees of the
Dayton, Ohio facility of Hewitt Soap
Works, Inc., located in Peapack, New
Jersey and Atlanta, Georgia. Since
workers of the Dayton, Ohio location of
the subject firm were certified eligible to
apply for alternative trade adjustment
assistance, the Department is extending
this eligibility to Mr. Thomas
O’Callaghan in Peapack, New Jersey and
Mr. Larry Southard in Atlanta, Georgia.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers of
Hewitt Soap Works, Inc., a subsidiary of
Bradford Soap Works, Inc., Dayton,
Ohio, who were adversely affected by
increased imports.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–55,298 is hereby issued as
follows:
All workers of Hewitt Soap Works, Inc., a
subsidiary of Bradford Soap Works, Inc.,
Dayton, Ohio (TA–W–55,298), including
employees of Hewitt Soap Works, Inc., a
subsidiary of Bradford Soap Works, Inc.,
Dayton, Ohio, located in Peapack, New Jersey
(TA–W–55,298A) and Atlanta, Georgia (TA–
W–55,298B), who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after June
22, 2003, through August 25, 2006, are
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974
and are also eligible to apply for alternative
trade adjustment assistance under Section
246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC this 23rd day of
February 2005.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–991 Filed 3–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:06 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–56,074]
Klipstand Manufacturing Company,
Inc., Westfield, MA; Dismissal of
Application for Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
Klipstand Manufacturing Company,
Inc., Westfield, Massachusetts. The
application contained no new
substantial information which would
bear importantly on the Department’s
determination. Therefore, dismissal of
the application was issued.
TA–W–56,074; Klipstand Manufacturing
Company, Inc., Westfield, Massachusetts
(February 15, 2005).
Signed at Washington, DC this 16th day of
February 2005.
Linda G. Poole,
Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–988 Filed 3–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19
U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
periods of February 2005.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for
directly-impacted (primary) worker
adjustment assistance to be issued, each
of the group eligibility requirements of
section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign county of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance as an
adversely affected secondary group to be
issued, each of the group eligibility
requirements of section 222(b) of the
Act must be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied for
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 11702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-988]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-56,074]
Klipstand Manufacturing Company, Inc., Westfield, MA; Dismissal
of Application for Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Klipstand Manufacturing Company,
Inc., Westfield, Massachusetts. The application contained no new
substantial information which would bear importantly on the
Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was
issued.
TA-W-56,074; Klipstand Manufacturing Company, Inc., Westfield,
Massachusetts (February 15, 2005).
Signed at Washington, DC this 16th day of February 2005.
Linda G. Poole,
Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-988 Filed 3-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
