Grants to States To Improve Management of Drug and Violence Prevention Programs, 11623-11625 [05-4616]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Notices
CITA is soliciting public comments
regarding this request, particularly with
respect to whether these fabrics can be
supplied by the domestic industry in
commercial quantities in a timely
manner. Also relevant is whether other
fabrics that are supplied by the domestic
industry in commercial quantities in a
timely manner are substitutable for the
fabric for purposes of the intended use.
Comments must be received no later
than March 24, 2005. Interested persons
are invited to submit six copies of such
comments or information to the
Chairman, Committee for the
Implementation of Textile Agreements,
room 3100, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th and Constitution
Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230.
If a comment alleges that these fabrics
can be supplied by the domestic
industry in commercial quantities in a
timely manner, CITA will closely
review any supporting documentation,
such as a signed statement by a
manufacturer of the fabric stating that it
produces the fabric that is the subject of
the request, including the quantities that
can be supplied and the time necessary
to fill an order, as well as any relevant
information regarding past production.
CITA will protect any business
confidential information that is marked
‘‘business confidential’’ from disclosure
to the full extent permitted by law.
CITA will make available to the public
non-confidential versions of the request
and non-confidential versions of any
public comments received with respect
to a request in room 3100 in the Herbert
Hoover Building, 14th and Constitution
Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230.
Persons submitting comments on a
request are encouraged to include a nonconfidential version and a nonconfidential summary.
James C. Leonard III,
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation
of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc. 05–4613 Filed 3–4–05; 2:57 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
Policy Change Regarding the
Publication of Notices of Funding
Availability
Corporation for National and
Community Service.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Register. Instead, all Corporation
NOFAs are synopsized and posted at the
government-wide Internet site, https://
Grants.gov, in accordance with the
policy directive issued by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). The
full NOFA associated with a synopsis
posted at Grants.gov may be accessed by
following the universal resource locator
(URL) link included in the synopsis, or
by visiting the Corporation’s Web site.
20:21 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Grants to States To Improve
Management of Drug and Violence
Prevention Programs
Office of Safe and Drug-Free
Schools, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed priorities
and requirements.
AGENCY:
Dated: March 3, 2005.
Marlene Zakai,
Director, Office of Grants Policy and
Operations.
[FR Doc. 05–4589 Filed 3–8–05; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY: The Assistant Deputy
Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free
Schools proposes priorities and
requirements under the Safe and DrugFree Schools and Communities Act
(SDFSCA) National Programs for the
Grants to States to Improve Management
of Drug and Violence Prevention
Programs. We may use one or more of
these priorities and requirements for
competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2005
and later years. We take this action to
focus Federal financial assistance on an
identified national need. We intend the
priorities and requirements to facilitate
the development, enhancement, or
expansion of the capacity of States and
other entities that receive SDFSCA State
Grants program funds to collect,
analyze, and use data to improve the
management of drug and violence
prevention programs.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before April 8, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about
these proposed priorities and
requirements to: Deborah Rudy, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., room 3E330, Washington,
DC 20202–6450. If you prefer to send
your comments through the Internet,
use the following address:
Deborah.Rudy@ed.gov.
You must include the term ‘‘184R
Comments’’ in the subject line of your
electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Rudy, Telephone: (202) 260–
1875 or via Internet:
Deborah.Rudy@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
BILLING CODE 6050–$$–P
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
EFFECTIVE DATE:
March 9, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marlene Zakai, Director, Office of Grants
Policy and Operations, 1201 New York
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20525,
(202) 606–5000 ext. 536 or by e-mail at
mzakai@cns.gov.
On
October 8, 2003, OMB issued a policy
directive entitled ‘‘Requirement to Post
Funding Opportunity Announcement
Synopses at Grant.gov and Related Data
Elements/Format’’ [68 FR 58146,
October 8, 2003]. The directive requires
every Federal agency that awards
discretionary grants and cooperative
agreements to post synopses of its
funding opportunity announcements in
standard format on the Internet at
https://Grants.gov or such Web site/
Internet address that may be identified
by OMB. A key purpose for establishing
a single government-wide Web site is to
provide prospective grant applicants the
opportunity to locate funding
opportunities in one place rather than
having to search for announcements in
multiple locations. Shortly after OMB
issued the directive, the Corporation
began posting synopses of its NOFAs at
Grants.gov. Each Corporation synopsis
includes information on how to obtain
the full NOFA, as well as a ULR link to
the full NOFA posted on the
Corporation’s own Web site. The
Corporation has determined that posting
its funding announcements at
Grants.gov and on its own Web site is
both effective and efficient. Therefore,
the Corporation has discontinued the
policy of publishing NOFAs in the
Federal Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation to Comment
SUMMARY: The Corporation for National
and Community Service (Corporation)
no longer publishes Notices of Funding
Availability (NOFAs) in the Federal
VerDate jul<14>2003
11623
PO 00000
We invite you to submit comments
regarding these proposed priorities and
requirements. To ensure that your
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
11624
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Notices
comments have maximum effect in
developing the notice of final priorities
and requirements, we urge you to
identify clearly the specific proposed
priority or requirement that each
comment addresses.
We invite you to assist us in
complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866
and its overall requirement of reducing
regulatory burden that might result from
these proposed priorities and
requirements. Please let us know of any
further opportunities we should take to
reduce potential costs or increase
potential benefits while preserving the
effective and efficient administration of
the program.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about these proposed priorities and
requirements in room 3E330, 400
Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington,
DC, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and
4 p.m., eastern time, Monday through
Friday of each week except Federal
holidays.
Assistance to Individuals With
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record
On request, we will supply an
appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for these proposed priorities and
requirements. If you want to schedule
an appointment for this type of aid,
please contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Proposed Priorities and Requirements
We will announce the final priorities
and requirements in a notice in the
Federal Register. We will determine the
final priorities and requirements after
considering responses to this notice and
other information available to the
Department. This notice does not
preclude us from proposing or funding
additional priorities or requirements
subject to meeting applicable
rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use one or more of these proposed
priorities or requirements, we invite
applications through a notice in the Federal
Register. The effect of each type of priority
follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute
priority we consider only applications
that meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority:
Under a competitive preference priority
we give competitive preference to an
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:06 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
application by either (1) awarding
additional points, depending on how
well or the extent to which the
application meets the competitive
priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2)
selecting an application that meets the
competitive priority over an application
of comparable merit that does not meet
the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an
invitational priority we are particularly
interested in applications that meet the
invitational priority. However, we do
not give an application that meets the
invitational priority a competitive or
absolute preference over other
applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Priorities
Proposed Priorities
Proposed Absolute Priority-Developing,
Enhancing, or Expanding the Capacity
of States and Other Entities that Receive
SDFSCA State Grants Funds to Collect,
Analyze, and use Data to Improve the
Quality of Drug and Violence
Prevention Programs
Background: States and their local
communities are implementing a variety
of programs, activities, and strategies
designed to prevent youth drug use and
violence in schools. Just as
policymakers, education professionals,
and parents seek reliable information
about student academic progress,
stakeholders also need sufficient
information and data to assess the
nature of youth drug and violence
problems in their communities, select
research-based approaches to preventing
these problems, and determine whether
these prevention efforts are effective.
The U.S. Department of Education
currently requires States to collect and
report data on youth drug and violence
prevention problems and prevention
efforts through a uniform management
information and reporting system
(UMIRS) that States must establish
under section 4112(c)(3) of the
Elementary and Secondary Education
Act of 1965, as amended by the No
Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (ESEA)
(20 U.S.C. 7112(c)(3)). States also need
to use objective data about school safety
to meet the Unsafe School Choice
Option (USCO) requirements in section
9532 of the ESEA.
States and local communities face
several challenges in implementing
these requirements and in turn
operating and managing effective drug
and violence prevention programs.
These challenges may include:
• Lack of standardized collection
instruments and definitions both within
and across States;
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Lack of expertise related to
collecting data about youth drug use
and violence;
• Lack of time and other resources to
support high-quality data collection and
analysis in these areas;
• Unfavorable community and media
reaction to high rates of youth drug use
and violence that discourages full and
accurate reporting; and
• Negative consequences for
administrators whose schools have high
rates of violent incidents.
The Department is proposing this
priority therefore to provide support to
States to explore strategies that will help
them address these challenges so that
they can enhance their capacity to
collect and use data to assess and
improve the implementation of their
drug and violence prevention programs.
Absolute Priority: This priority would
support projects to develop, enhance, or
expand the capacity of States and other
entities that receive SDFSCA State
Grants program funds to collect,
analyze, and use data to improve the
management of drug and violence
prevention programs. At a minimum,
applicants must propose projects to
develop, enhance, or expand the
capacity of the State educational agency
(SEA), the State agency administering
the Governor’s funding under the
SDFSCA State Grants program, and
local educational agencies and
community-based organizations that
receive SDFSCA State Grants program
funding.
Specifically, projects must be
designed to:
(a) Include activities designed to
expand the capacity of local recipients
of SDFSCA funds to use data to assess
needs, establish performance measures,
select appropriate interventions,
monitor progress toward established
performance measures, and disseminate
information about youth drug use and
violence to the public;
(b) Collect data that, at a minimum,
meet the requirements of the UMIRS
described in section 4112(c)(3) of the
ESEA;
(c) Operate with the aid of a
technology-based system for analyzing
and interpreting school crime and
violence data;
(d) Be consistent with the State’s
Performance-Based Data Management
Initiative (PBDMI) strategy and produce
data that can be transmitted to the U.S.
Department of Education via the
Department’s Education Data Exchange
Network (EDEN) project, which
facilitates the transfer of information
from State administrative records to the
Department to satisfy reporting
requirements for certain programs
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Notices
administered by the Department,
including the SDFSCA State Grants
program;
(e) Be an enhancement to, or capable
of merging data with, the State’s student
information system if such exists or if
the State does not yet have a statewide,
longitudinal student data system, the
project should include the capacity to
merge with such a system in the future;
and
(f) Include validation and verification
activities at the State and sub-State
recipient levels designed to ensure the
accuracy of data collected and reported.
Proposed Competitive Preference
Priority—Use of Uniform Crime
Reporting Definitions
Background: Uniform definitions of
data elements make it easier for
stakeholders to collect, analyze, and
compare data across district, county,
State, and other boundaries. The Federal
Bureau of Investigation’s Uniform Crime
Reporting (UCR) program is the most
universal crime reporting system in the
country and collects information about
the following crimes: Homicide; forcible
rape; robbery; aggravated assault;
burglary; larceny-theft; motor vehicle
theft; and arson. The majority of States
have a UCR program and many require
mandatory reporting. Further
information about the UCR is available
online at https://www.fbi.gov/ucr/
ucr.htm.
Competitive Preference Priority: The
collection of incident data for projects
under Priority 1 will be done in a
manner consistent with the definitions
and protocols developed under the
Federal Bureau of Investigation’s UCR
program.
Other Proposed Requirements
Eligibility of Applicants: We propose
that eligible applicants for this program
be limited to State educational agencies
(SEAs) or other State agencies
administering the SDFSCA State Grants
program.
We propose this requirement to focus
projects on Statewide systems of data
collection that support the UMIRS
requirements. Local or regional projects
are inconsistent with the emphasis in
the SDFSCA on Statewide data
collection systems for youth drug and
violence prevention information.
Memorandum of Understanding: We
propose that applicants be required to
include a memorandum of
understanding (MOU) in their
application that outlines project roles
and responsibilities of the participants
and that contains:
1. The signatures of:
VerDate jul<14>2003
20:21 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
a. The authorized representative(s) for
the SEA, and
b. The authorized representative(s) for
the State agency (or agencies) receiving
the Governor’s portion of SDFSCA State
Grants program funding for the State.
2. Evidence that the proposal has been
reviewed by, and has the approval of,
the State’s chief information officer
(CIO) and/or chief technology officer
(CTO). The CIO and/or CTO may sign
the required memorandum of
understanding, or may provide a
separate document including the
required assurance.
We propose this requirement in order
to ensure that entities responsible for
the development of the UMIRS within a
State will be involved in the design and
implementation of any funded project,
and that technical aspects of the project
have the approval of the State official
charged with overseeing information
management and technology issues
within the State.
Technology-Based System: We
propose that each application be
required to include a proposal for a
technology-based system for collecting,
analyzing, and interpreting school crime
and violence data. Grant funds may be
used in a variety of ways to support this
system, including updating an existing
infrastructure, conducting basic
planning, and capacity building.
We propose this requirement to
ensure that grant funds are used to
support the development of a system
that takes advantage of widely available
technology to support the efficient
collection, analysis and interpretation of
school crime and violence data.
Executive Order 12866
This notice of proposed priorities and
requirements has been reviewed in
accordance with Executive Order 12866.
Under the terms of the order, we have
assessed the potential costs and benefits
of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with
the notice of proposed priorities and
requirements are those resulting from
statutory requirements and those we
have determined as necessary for
administering this program effectively
and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of this notice of proposed
priorities and requirements, we have
determined that the benefits of the
proposed priorities justify the costs.
We have also determined that this
regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11625
Intergovernmental Review
This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the
Executive order is to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened federalism. The Executive
order relies on processes developed by
State and local governments for
coordination and review of proposed
Federal financial assistance.
This document provides early
notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You may view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
FedRegister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
You may also view this document in
text or PDF at the following site:
https://www.ed.gov/programs/
dvpstatemanagement/applicant.html.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at:
https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/.
Dated: March 4, 2005.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 84.184R Grants to States to Improve
Management of Drug and Violence
Prevention Programs.)
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7131.
Deborah A. Price,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and DrugFree Schools.
[FR Doc. 05–4616 Filed 3–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4001–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
President’s Board of Advisors on
Historically Black Colleges and
Universities
AGENCY: President’s Board of Advisors
on Historically Black Colleges and
Universities, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of an open meeting.
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the
schedule and agenda of the meeting of
the President’s Board of Advisors on
Historically Black Colleges and
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11623-11625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4616]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Grants to States To Improve Management of Drug and Violence
Prevention Programs
AGENCY: Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed priorities and requirements.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools
proposes priorities and requirements under the Safe and Drug-Free
Schools and Communities Act (SDFSCA) National Programs for the Grants
to States to Improve Management of Drug and Violence Prevention
Programs. We may use one or more of these priorities and requirements
for competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2005 and later years. We take this
action to focus Federal financial assistance on an identified national
need. We intend the priorities and requirements to facilitate the
development, enhancement, or expansion of the capacity of States and
other entities that receive SDFSCA State Grants program funds to
collect, analyze, and use data to improve the management of drug and
violence prevention programs.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before April 8, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about these proposed priorities and
requirements to: Deborah Rudy, U.S. Department of Education, 400
Maryland Avenue, SW., room 3E330, Washington, DC 20202-6450. If you
prefer to send your comments through the Internet, use the following
address: Deborah.Rudy@ed.gov.
You must include the term ``184R Comments'' in the subject line of
your electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Rudy, Telephone: (202) 260-
1875 or via Internet: Deborah.Rudy@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Invitation to Comment
We invite you to submit comments regarding these proposed
priorities and requirements. To ensure that your
[[Page 11624]]
comments have maximum effect in developing the notice of final
priorities and requirements, we urge you to identify clearly the
specific proposed priority or requirement that each comment addresses.
We invite you to assist us in complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866 and its overall requirement of
reducing regulatory burden that might result from these proposed
priorities and requirements. Please let us know of any further
opportunities we should take to reduce potential costs or increase
potential benefits while preserving the effective and efficient
administration of the program.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about these proposed priorities and requirements in room
3E330, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, between the hours of
8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., eastern time, Monday through Friday of each week
except Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals With Disabilities in Reviewing the Rulemaking
Record
On request, we will supply an appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a disability who needs
assistance to review the comments or other documents in the public
rulemaking record for these proposed priorities and requirements. If
you want to schedule an appointment for this type of aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Proposed Priorities and Requirements
We will announce the final priorities and requirements in a notice
in the Federal Register. We will determine the final priorities and
requirements after considering responses to this notice and other
information available to the Department. This notice does not preclude
us from proposing or funding additional priorities or requirements
subject to meeting applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use one or more of these proposed priorities or
requirements, we invite applications through a notice in the Federal
Register. The effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority we consider only
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference
priority we give competitive preference to an application by either (1)
awarding additional points, depending on how well or the extent to
which the application meets the competitive priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting an application that meets the
competitive priority over an application of comparable merit that does
not meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority we are
particularly interested in applications that meet the invitational
priority. However, we do not give an application that meets the
invitational priority a competitive or absolute preference over other
applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Priorities
Proposed Priorities
Proposed Absolute Priority-Developing, Enhancing, or Expanding the
Capacity of States and Other Entities that Receive SDFSCA State Grants
Funds to Collect, Analyze, and use Data to Improve the Quality of Drug
and Violence Prevention Programs
Background: States and their local communities are implementing a
variety of programs, activities, and strategies designed to prevent
youth drug use and violence in schools. Just as policymakers, education
professionals, and parents seek reliable information about student
academic progress, stakeholders also need sufficient information and
data to assess the nature of youth drug and violence problems in their
communities, select research-based approaches to preventing these
problems, and determine whether these prevention efforts are effective.
The U.S. Department of Education currently requires States to
collect and report data on youth drug and violence prevention problems
and prevention efforts through a uniform management information and
reporting system (UMIRS) that States must establish under section
4112(c)(3) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as
amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (ESEA) (20 U.S.C.
7112(c)(3)). States also need to use objective data about school safety
to meet the Unsafe School Choice Option (USCO) requirements in section
9532 of the ESEA.
States and local communities face several challenges in
implementing these requirements and in turn operating and managing
effective drug and violence prevention programs. These challenges may
include:
Lack of standardized collection instruments and
definitions both within and across States;
Lack of expertise related to collecting data about youth
drug use and violence;
Lack of time and other resources to support high-quality
data collection and analysis in these areas;
Unfavorable community and media reaction to high rates of
youth drug use and violence that discourages full and accurate
reporting; and
Negative consequences for administrators whose schools
have high rates of violent incidents.
The Department is proposing this priority therefore to provide
support to States to explore strategies that will help them address
these challenges so that they can enhance their capacity to collect and
use data to assess and improve the implementation of their drug and
violence prevention programs.
Absolute Priority: This priority would support projects to develop,
enhance, or expand the capacity of States and other entities that
receive SDFSCA State Grants program funds to collect, analyze, and use
data to improve the management of drug and violence prevention
programs. At a minimum, applicants must propose projects to develop,
enhance, or expand the capacity of the State educational agency (SEA),
the State agency administering the Governor's funding under the SDFSCA
State Grants program, and local educational agencies and community-
based organizations that receive SDFSCA State Grants program funding.
Specifically, projects must be designed to:
(a) Include activities designed to expand the capacity of local
recipients of SDFSCA funds to use data to assess needs, establish
performance measures, select appropriate interventions, monitor
progress toward established performance measures, and disseminate
information about youth drug use and violence to the public;
(b) Collect data that, at a minimum, meet the requirements of the
UMIRS described in section 4112(c)(3) of the ESEA;
(c) Operate with the aid of a technology-based system for analyzing
and interpreting school crime and violence data;
(d) Be consistent with the State's Performance-Based Data
Management Initiative (PBDMI) strategy and produce data that can be
transmitted to the U.S. Department of Education via the Department's
Education Data Exchange Network (EDEN) project, which facilitates the
transfer of information from State administrative records to the
Department to satisfy reporting requirements for certain programs
[[Page 11625]]
administered by the Department, including the SDFSCA State Grants
program;
(e) Be an enhancement to, or capable of merging data with, the
State's student information system if such exists or if the State does
not yet have a statewide, longitudinal student data system, the project
should include the capacity to merge with such a system in the future;
and
(f) Include validation and verification activities at the State and
sub-State recipient levels designed to ensure the accuracy of data
collected and reported.
Proposed Competitive Preference Priority--Use of Uniform Crime
Reporting Definitions
Background: Uniform definitions of data elements make it easier for
stakeholders to collect, analyze, and compare data across district,
county, State, and other boundaries. The Federal Bureau of
Investigation's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program is the most
universal crime reporting system in the country and collects
information about the following crimes: Homicide; forcible rape;
robbery; aggravated assault; burglary; larceny-theft; motor vehicle
theft; and arson. The majority of States have a UCR program and many
require mandatory reporting. Further information about the UCR is
available online at https://www.fbi.gov/ucr/ucr.htm.
Competitive Preference Priority: The collection of incident data
for projects under Priority 1 will be done in a manner consistent with
the definitions and protocols developed under the Federal Bureau of
Investigation's UCR program.
Other Proposed Requirements
Eligibility of Applicants: We propose that eligible applicants for
this program be limited to State educational agencies (SEAs) or other
State agencies administering the SDFSCA State Grants program.
We propose this requirement to focus projects on Statewide systems
of data collection that support the UMIRS requirements. Local or
regional projects are inconsistent with the emphasis in the SDFSCA on
Statewide data collection systems for youth drug and violence
prevention information.
Memorandum of Understanding: We propose that applicants be required
to include a memorandum of understanding (MOU) in their application
that outlines project roles and responsibilities of the participants
and that contains:
1. The signatures of:
a. The authorized representative(s) for the SEA, and
b. The authorized representative(s) for the State agency (or
agencies) receiving the Governor's portion of SDFSCA State Grants
program funding for the State.
2. Evidence that the proposal has been reviewed by, and has the
approval of, the State's chief information officer (CIO) and/or chief
technology officer (CTO). The CIO and/or CTO may sign the required
memorandum of understanding, or may provide a separate document
including the required assurance.
We propose this requirement in order to ensure that entities
responsible for the development of the UMIRS within a State will be
involved in the design and implementation of any funded project, and
that technical aspects of the project have the approval of the State
official charged with overseeing information management and technology
issues within the State.
Technology-Based System: We propose that each application be
required to include a proposal for a technology-based system for
collecting, analyzing, and interpreting school crime and violence data.
Grant funds may be used in a variety of ways to support this system,
including updating an existing infrastructure, conducting basic
planning, and capacity building.
We propose this requirement to ensure that grant funds are used to
support the development of a system that takes advantage of widely
available technology to support the efficient collection, analysis and
interpretation of school crime and violence data.
Executive Order 12866
This notice of proposed priorities and requirements has been
reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 12866. Under the terms of
the order, we have assessed the potential costs and benefits of this
regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with the notice of proposed
priorities and requirements are those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have determined as necessary for
administering this program effectively and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of this notice of proposed priorities and
requirements, we have determined that the benefits of the proposed
priorities justify the costs.
We have also determined that this regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal governments in the exercise of
their governmental functions.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is subject to Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the Executive
order is to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened
federalism. The Executive order relies on processes developed by State
and local governments for coordination and review of proposed Federal
financial assistance.
This document provides early notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Electronic Access to This Document: You may view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the
Internet at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/FedRegister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in
the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.
You may also view this document in text or PDF at the following
site: https://www.ed.gov/programs/dvpstatemanagement/applicant.html.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
nara/.
Dated: March 4, 2005.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 84.184R Grants to
States to Improve Management of Drug and Violence Prevention
Programs.)
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7131.
Deborah A. Price,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools.
[FR Doc. 05-4616 Filed 3-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4001-01-P