SEI Institutional Managed Trust, et al.; Notice of Application, 9117-9122 [E5-766]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 36 / Thursday, February 24, 2005 / Notices
guarantors have filed an application
under section 304(d) of the Trust
Indenture Act of 1939. Mrs. Fields
Famous Brands, Mrs. Fields Financing
Company, and certain guarantors ask
the Commission to exempt from the
certificate or opinion delivery
requirements of section 314(d) of the
1939 Act certain provisions of an
indenture dated March 16, 2004, as
supplemented by an indenture dated
February 9, 2005, between Mrs. Fields
Famous Brands, Mrs. Fields Financing
Company, certain guarantors, and the
Bank of New York, as trustee. The
indenture relates to 111⁄2% Senior
Secured Notes due 2011 and 9% Senior
Secured Notes due 2011.
Section 304(d) of the 1939 Act, in
part, authorizes the Commission to
exempt conditionally or
unconditionally any indenture from one
or more provisions of the 1939 Act. The
Commission may provide an exemption
under section 304(d) if it finds that the
exemption is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest and consistent
with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the 1939
Act.
Section 314(d) requires the obligor to
furnish to the indenture trustee
certificates or opinions of fair value
from an engineer, appraiser or other
expert upon any release of collateral
from the lien of the indenture. The
engineer, appraiser or other expert must
opine that the proposed release will not
impair the security under the indenture
in contravention of the provisions of the
indenture. The application requests an
exemption from section 314(d) for
specified dispositions of collateral that
are made in Mrs. Fields Famous
Brands’, Mrs. Fields Financing
Company’s, and the guarantors’
ordinary course of business.
In its application, Mrs. Fields Famous
Brands, Mrs. Fields Financing
Company, and the guarantors allege
that:
1. The indenture permits Mrs. Fields
Famous Brands, Mrs. Fields Financing
Company, and the guarantors to dispose
of collateral in the ordinary course of
their business;
2. Mrs. Fields Famous Brands, Mrs.
Fields Financing Company, and the
guarantors will deliver to the trustee
annual consolidated financial
statements audited by certified
independent accountants; and
3. Mrs. Fields Famous Brands, Mrs.
Fields Financing Company, and the
guarantors will deliver to the trustee a
semi-annual certificate stating that all
dispositions of collateral during the
relevant six-month period occurred in
Mrs. Fields Famous Brands’, Mrs. Fields
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:49 Feb 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
Financing Company’s, and the
guarantors’ ordinary course of business
and that all of the proceeds were used
as permitted by the indenture.
Any interested persons should look to
the application for a more detailed
statement of the asserted matters of fact
and law. The application is on file in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Section, File Number 22–28772, 450
Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
20549.
The Commission also gives notice that
any interested persons may request, in
writing, that a hearing be held on this
matter. Interested persons must submit
those requests to the Commission no
later than March 18, 2005. Interested
persons must include the following in
their request for a hearing on this
matter:
—The nature of that person’s interest;
—The reasons for the request; and
—The issues of law or fact raised by the
application that the interested person
desires to refute or request a hearing
on.
The interested person should address
this request for a hearing to: Jonathan G.
Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20549–0609. At any
time after March 18, 2005, the
Commission may issue an order
granting the application, unless the
Commission orders a hearing.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Corporation Finance, pursuant to delegated
authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–751 Filed 2–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No.
26762; 812–12823]
SEI Institutional Managed Trust, et al.;
Notice of Application
February 17, 2005.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of application for an
order under the Investment Company
Act of 1940 (the ‘‘Act’’) under (i) section
6(c) of the Act granting an exemption
from sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act;
(ii) section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act granting
an exemption from section 12(d)(1) of
the Act; (iii) sections 6(c) and 17(b) of
the Act granting an exemption from
sections 17(a)(1) and 17(a)(3) of the Act;
and (iv) section 17(d) of the Act and rule
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9117
17d–1 under the Act to permit certain
joint transactions.
Applicants
request an order that would permit
certain registered management
investment companies to participate in
a joint lending and borrowing facility.
APPLICANTS: SEI Investments
Management Corporation (‘‘SIMC’’) and
any person controlling, controlled by or
under common control with SIMC
(together with SIMC, the ‘‘Advisers’’);
SEI Investments Fund Management
(‘‘SEI Management,’’ and together with
SIMC, ‘‘SEI’’); SEI Institutional Managed
Trust, SEI Institutional Investments
Trust, SEI Institutional International
Trust, SEI Index Funds, SEI Asset
Allocation Trust, SEI Liquid Asset
Trust, SEI Daily Income Trust, SEI Tax
Exempt Trust (each, a ‘‘Trust’’ and
collectively, the ‘‘Trusts’’), for and on
behalf of each of their series now or
hereafter existing (collectively, the ‘‘SEI
Funds’’).
FILING DATES: The application was filed
on May 16, 2002, and amended on
February 2, 2005.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An
order granting the application will be
issued unless the Commission orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request
a hearing by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary and serving
applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on March 14, 2005, and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on the applicants, in the form of
an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate
of service. Hearing requests should state
the nature of the writer’s interest, the
reason for the request, and the issues
contested. Persons who wish to be
notified of a hearing may request
notification by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Commission, 450
Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
20549–0609; Applicants, c/o Timothy D.
Barto, Esq., SEI Investments, One
Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, PA 19456.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Keith A. Gregory, Senior Counsel, at
(202) 551–6815 or Mary Kay Frech,
Branch Chief, at (202) 551–6621
(Division of Investment Management,
Office of Investment Company
Regulation).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained for a fee at the
Commission’s Public Reference Branch,
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
20549–0102 (tel. (202) 942–8090).
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION:
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
9118
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 36 / Thursday, February 24, 2005 / Notices
Applicants’ Representations
1. Each Trust is registered under the
Act as an open-end management
investment company and is organized as
a Massachusetts business trust.1 Each
Trust offers multiple Funds. The Funds
of the Trusts are all in the same group
of investment companies as defined in
section 12(d)(1)(G)(ii) of the Act. SIMC
is registered as an investment adviser
under the Investment Advisers Act of
1940 and serves as investment adviser
to certain SEI Funds. SIMC is the owner
of all beneficial interest in SEI
Management, which provides the SEI
Funds with overall administrative
services.
2. Some Funds may lend money to
banks or other entities by entering into
repurchase agreements or purchasing
other short-term instruments. Other
Funds may need to borrow money from
the same or similar banks for temporary
purposes to satisfy redemption requests,
to cover unanticipated cash shortfalls
such as a trade ‘‘fail’’ in which cash
payment for a security sold by a Fund
has been delayed, or for other temporary
purposes. Currently, the SEI Funds have
uncommitted lines of credit with
various banks and overdraft protection
provided by their custodian bank.
3. If a Fund were to borrow money
through its line of credit or incur an
overdraft with its custodian bank, the
Fund would pay interest on the
borrowed cash at a rate that would be
higher than the rate that other nonborrowing Funds would earn on
repurchase agreements and other shortterm instruments of the same maturity
as the bank loan. Applicants state that
this differential represents the bank’s
profit for serving as a middleman
between a borrower and a lender. Other
bank loan arrangements, such as
1 Applicants request that the relief also apply to
any other existing or future registered management
investment company or series thereof (i) that is
advised by SIMC or its successors or another
Adviser or (ii) for which SEI Investments
Distribution Co. (‘‘SIDCo.’’) (or its successors)
serves as principal underwriter or for which SEI
Management (or its successors) serves as the
administrator and which is part of the same group
of investment companies (as defined in section
12(d)(1)(G)(ii) of the Act) as the Trusts (collectively,
the ‘‘Future Funds’’ and together with the SEI
Funds, the ‘‘Funds’’). ‘‘Successor’’ means any entity
that results from a reorganization into another
jurisdiction or a change in the type of business
organization. All existing Funds that currently
intend to rely on the requested order are named as
applicants. Any other existing and Future Funds
that may rely on the relief in the future will do so
only in accordance with the terms and conditions
of the application. For Funds that are not advised
by SIMC, SEI Management (as the Funds’
administrator), SIDCo. (as the Funds’ distributor)
and/or the Board (as defined below) will be
responsible for such Funds’ compliance with the
terms and conditions of the application.
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:49 Feb 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
committed lines of credit, would require
the Funds to pay substantial
commitment fees in addition to the
interest rate to be paid by the borrowing
Fund.
4. Applicants request an order that
would permit the Funds to enter into
master interfund lending agreements
(‘‘Interfund Lending Agreements’’)
under which the Funds would lend and
borrow money for temporary purposes
directly to and from each other through
a credit facility (an ‘‘Interfund Loan’’).2
Applicants believe that the proposed
credit facility would reduce the Funds’
potential borrowing costs and enhance
their ability to earn higher rates of
interest on short-term lendings.
Although the proposed credit facility
would reduce the Open-End Funds’
need to borrow from banks, the OpenEnd Funds would be free to establish
committed lines of credit or other
borrowing arrangements with banks.
The Funds also would continue to
maintain their existing uncommitted
lines of credit and overdraft protection.
5. Applicants anticipate that the
credit facility will provide a borrowing
Fund with significant cost savings when
the cash position of the Fund is
insufficient to meet temporary cash
requirements. This situation could arise
when redemptions exceed anticipated
volumes and the Fund has insufficient
cash on hand to satisfy such
redemptions. When a Fund liquidates
portfolio securities to meet redemption
requests, it often does not receive
payment in settlement for up to three
days (or longer for certain foreign
transactions). The credit facility would
provide a source of immediate, shortterm liquidity pending settlement of the
sale of portfolio securities.
6. Applicants also propose using the
credit facility when a sale of portfolio
securities fails due to circumstances
beyond the Fund’s control, such as a
delay in the delivery of cash to the
Fund’s custodian or improper delivery
instructions by the broker effecting the
transaction. Sales fails may present a
cash shortfall if the Fund has
undertaken to purchase a security with
the proceeds from securities sold. When
the Fund experiences a cash shortfall
due to a sales fail, the custodian
typically extends temporary credit to
cover the shortfall and the Fund incurs
overdraft charges. Alternatively, the
Fund could fail on its intended
purchase due to lack of funds from the
2 Applicants represent that any open-end Fund
(an ‘‘Open-End Fund’’) may participate in the
proposed credit facility as either a borrower or a
lender. Applicants further represent that any
closed-end Fund that participates in the proposed
credit facility would only participate as a lender.
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
previous sale, resulting in additional
costs to the Fund, or sell a security on
a same day settlement basis, earning a
lower return on the investment. Use of
the credit facility under these
circumstances would enable the Fund to
have access to immediate short-term
liquidity without incurring custodian
overdraft or other charges.
7. While bank borrowings could
generally supply needed cash to cover
unanticipated redemptions and sales
fails, under the credit facility, a
borrowing Fund would pay lower
interest rates than those offered by
banks on short-term loans. In addition,
Funds making short-term cash loans
directly to other Funds would earn
interest at a rate higher than they
otherwise could obtain from investing
their cash in repurchase agreements.
Thus, applicants believe that the credit
facility would benefit both borrowing
and lending Funds.
8. The interest rate charged to the
Funds on any loan (the ‘‘Interfund Loan
Rate’’) would be determined daily and
would be the average of the Repo Rate
and the Bank Loan Rate, both as defined
below. The Repo Rate on any day would
be the highest rate available to the
Funds from investments in overnight
repurchase agreements, either directly
or through a joint account. The Bank
Loan Rate for any day would be
calculated by the Interfund Lending
Team (as defined below) each day an
Interfund Loan is made according to a
formula established by a Fund’s board
of trustees (‘‘Board’’) designed to
approximate the lowest interest rate at
which short-term bank loans would be
available to the Funds. The formula
would be based upon a publicly
available rate (e.g., Federal funds plus
25 basis points) and would vary with
this rate so as to reflect changing bank
loan rates. Each Board periodically
would review the continuing
appropriateness of using the publicly
available rate to determine the Bank
Loan Rate, as well as the relationship
between the Bank Loan Rate and current
bank loan rates that would be available
to the Funds. The initial formula and
any subsequent modifications to the
formula would be subject to the
approval of each Fund’s Board.
9. Employees of SEI (the ‘‘Interfund
Lending Team’’) would administer the
credit facility. The Interfund Lending
Team may include representative
employees of SEI Management’s Fund
Accounting Department, a unit of SEI
Management responsible for providing
valuation and fund accounting services
to the Funds, as well as SIMC
investment professionals and other
personnel from SEI Management. The
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 36 / Thursday, February 24, 2005 / Notices
Interfund Lending Team will not
include any portfolio managers of a
Fund. Under the credit facility, the
portfolio managers for each
participating Fund could provide
standing instructions to participate as a
borrower or lender. On each business
day, the Interfund Lending Team would
collect data on the uninvested cash and
borrowing requirements of all
participating Funds from the Funds’
custodian. Once it had determined the
aggregate amount of cash available for
loans and borrowing demand, the
Interfund Lending Team would allocate
loans among borrowing Funds without
any further communication from
portfolio managers. It is expected that
there typically will be far more available
uninvested cash each day than
borrowing demand. After the Interfund
Lending Team has allocated cash for
Interfund Loans, the Interfund Lending
Team will invest any remaining cash in
accordance with the standing
instructions of portfolio managers or
return remaining amounts for
investment directly by the Funds.
10. The Interfund Lending Team
would allocate borrowing demand and
cash available for lending among the
Funds on what the Interfund Lending
Team believes to be an equitable basis,
subject to certain administrative
procedures applicable to all Funds, such
as the time of filing requests to
participate; minimum loan lot sizes; and
the need to minimize the number of
transactions and associated
administrative costs. To reduce
transaction costs, each loan normally
would be allocated in a manner
intended to minimize the number of
participants necessary to complete the
loan transaction. The method of
allocation and related administrative
procedures would be approved by each
Board, including a majority of trustees
who are not ‘‘interested persons’’ of the
Fund, as defined in section 2(a)(19) of
the Act (‘‘Independent Trustees’’), to
ensure that both borrowing and lending
Funds participate on an equitable basis.
11. The Interfund Lending Team
would (a) monitor the interest rates
charged and the other terms and
conditions of the loans, (b) limit the
borrowings and loans entered into by
each Fund to ensure that they comply
with the Fund’s investment policies and
limitations, (c) ensure equitable
treatment of each Fund, and (d) make
quarterly reports to the Boards
concerning any transactions by the
Funds under the credit facility and the
interest rates charged.
12. SEI Management and SIMC would
administer the credit facility under their
existing administration agreement and
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:49 Feb 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
advisory agreement, respectively, with
each Fund and would receive no
additional fee as compensation for their
services. SEI Management could,
however, collect reimbursement for
standard pricing, record keeping,
bookkeeping, and accounting costs
applicable to repurchase and lending
transactions generally, including
transactions effected through the credit
facility. Fees for these services would be
no higher than those applicable for
comparable bank loan transactions.
With respect to Funds for which SIDCo.
serves as principal underwriter and
which have no other connection to SEI,
SEI Management and SIMC will
administer the credit facility pursuant to
a written contract which describes the
credit facility administration services
and requires that such services be
provided in accordance with the terms
and conditions set forth in the
application. The written contract also
will provide that SEI Management and
SIMC will receive no fee for these
services.
13. Each Fund’s participation in the
credit facility is consistent with its
organizational documents and its
investment policies and limitations. The
Statement of Additional Information
(‘‘SAI’’) of each Fund discloses the
individual borrowing and lending
limitations of the Fund. The SAI of each
Fund participating in the credit facility
will disclose all material information
about the credit facility.
14. In connection with the proposed
credit facility, applicants request an
order under (a) section 6(c) of the Act
granting relief from sections 18(f) and
21(b) of the Act; (b) section 12(d)(1)(J) of
the Act granting relief from section
12(d)(1) of the Act; (c) sections 6(c) and
17(b) of the Act granting relief from
sections 17(a)(1) and 17(a)(3) of the Act;
and (d) section 17(d) of the Act and rule
17d–1 under the Act to permit certain
joint arrangements.
Applicants’ Legal Analysis
1. Section 17(a)(3) of the Act generally
prohibits any affiliated person, or
affiliated person of an affiliated person,
from borrowing money or other property
from a registered investment company.
Section 21(b) of the Act generally
prohibits any registered management
investment company from lending
money or other property to any person
if that person controls or is under
common control with the company.
Section 2(a)(3)(C) of the Act defines
‘‘affiliated person’’ of another person, in
part, to be any person directly or
indirectly controlling, controlled by, or
under common control with, such other
person. Applicants state that the Funds
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9119
may be under common control by virtue
of having SIMC as their common
investment adviser and/or by virtue of
SEI’s sponsorship and significant
involvement with the Funds and due to
the Funds’ common Board.
2. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that
an exemptive order may be granted
where an exemption is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest and
consistent with the protection of
investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of
the Act. Section 17(b) authorizes the
Commission to exempt a proposed
transaction from section 17(a) of the Act
provided that the terms of the
transaction, including the consideration
to be paid or received, are fair and
reasonable and do not involve
overreaching on the part of any person
concerned, and the transaction is
consistent with the policy of the
investment company as recited in its
registration statement and with the
general purposes of the Act. Applicants
believe that the proposed arrangements
satisfy these standards for the reasons
discussed below.
3. Applicants submit that sections
17(a)(3) and 21(b) were intended to
prevent a person with strong potential
adverse interests to, and some influence
over the investment decisions of, a
registered investment company from
causing or inducing the investment
company to engage in lending
transactions that unfairly inure to the
benefit of that person and that are
detrimental to the best interests of the
investment company and its
shareholders. Applicants assert that the
proposed credit facility transactions do
not raise these concerns because (a)
SIMC would administer the program as
a disinterested fiduciary with respect to
Funds it advises and as a disinterested
party with respect to Funds it does not
advise; (b) all Interfund Loans would
consist only of uninvested cash reserves
that the Funds otherwise would invest
in short-term repurchase agreements or
other short-term instruments; (c) the
Interfund Loans would not involve a
greater risk than such other investments;
(d) a lending Fund would receive
interest at a rate higher than it could
obtain through such other investments;
and (e) a borrowing Fund would pay
interest at a rate lower than otherwise
available to it under its bank loan
agreements and avoid the up-front
commitment fees associated with
committed lines of credit. Moreover,
applicants believe that the other
conditions in the application would
effectively preclude the possibility of
any Fund obtaining an undue advantage
over any other Fund.
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
9120
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 36 / Thursday, February 24, 2005 / Notices
4. Section 17(a)(1) of the Act generally
prohibits an affiliated person of a
registered investment company, or an
affiliated person of an affiliated person,
from selling any securities or other
property to the company. Section
12(d)(1) of the Act generally makes it
unlawful for a registered investment
company to purchase or otherwise
acquire any security issued by any other
investment company except in
accordance with the limitations set forth
in that section. Applicants state that the
obligation of a borrowing Fund to repay
an Interfund Loan may constitute a
security under sections 17(a)(1) and
12(d)(1). Section 12(d)(1)(J) provides
that an exemptive order may be granted
by the Commission from any provision
of section 12(d)(1) if and to the extent
such exemption is consistent with the
public interest and the protection of
investors. Applicants contend that the
standards under sections 6(c), 17(b) and
12(d)(1)(J) are satisfied for all the
reasons set forth above in support of
their request for relief from sections
17(a)(3) and 21(b) and for the reasons
discussed below.
5. Applicants state that section
12(d)(1) was intended to prevent the
pyramiding of investment companies in
order to avoid duplicative costs and fees
attendant upon multiple layers of
investment companies. Applicants
submit that the proposed credit facility
does not involve these abuses.
Applicants note that there would be no
duplicative costs or fees to the Funds or
shareholders, and that the Interfund
Lending Team would administer the
credit facility under SEI Management’s
and SIMC’s existing management and
advisory agreements, respectively, with
the Funds, and would receive no
additional compensation for its services.
With respect to Funds for which SIDCo.
serves as principal underwriter and
which have no other connection to SEI,
SEI Management and SIMC will
administer the credit facility pursuant to
a written contract which describes the
credit facility administration services
and requires that such services be
provided in accordance with the terms
and conditions set forth in the
application. The written contract also
will provide that SEI Management and
SIMC will receive no fee for these
services. Applicants also note that the
purpose of the proposed credit facility
is to provide economic benefits for all
the participating Funds.
6. Section 18(f)(1) of the Act prohibits
open-end investment companies from
issuing any senior security except that
a company is permitted to borrow from
any bank; provided that, immediately
after the borrowing, there is an asset
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:49 Feb 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
coverage of at least 300 per centum for
all borrowings of the company. Under
section 18(g) of the Act, the term ‘‘senior
security’’ includes any bond, debenture,
note, or similar obligation or instrument
constituting a security and evidencing
indebtedness. Applicants request
exemptive relief from section 18(f)(1) to
the limited extent necessary to
implement the credit facility (because
the lending Funds are not banks).
7. Applicants believe that granting the
relief under section 6(c) is appropriate
because the borrowing Funds would
remain subject to the requirement of
section 18(f)(1) that all borrowings of
the Fund, including combined interfund
and bank borrowings, have at least
300% asset coverage. Based on the
conditions and safeguards described in
the application, applicants also submit
that to allow the Funds to borrow from
other Funds pursuant to the proposed
credit facility is consistent with the
purposes and policies of section 18(f)(1).
8. Section 17(d) of the Act and rule
17d–1 thereunder generally prohibit any
affiliated person of a registered
investment company, or affiliated
persons of an affiliated person, when
acting as principal, from effecting any
joint transaction unless the transaction
is approved by the Commission. Rule
17d–1(b) under the Act provides that in
passing upon applications for exemptive
relief, the Commission will consider
whether the participation of a registered
investment company in a joint
enterprise on the basis proposed is
consistent with the provisions, policies
and purposes of the Act and the extent
to which the company’s participation is
on a basis different from or less
advantageous than that of other
participants.
9. Applicants submit that the purpose
of section 17(d) is to avoid overreaching
by an unfair advantage to investment
company insiders. Applicants believe
that the credit facility is consistent with
the provisions, policies and purposes of
the Act in that it offers both reduced
borrowing costs and enhanced returns
on loaned funds to all participating
Funds and their shareholders.
Applicants note that each Fund would
have an equal opportunity to borrow
and lend on equal terms consistent with
its investment policies and limitations.
Applicants therefore believe that each
Fund’s participation in the credit
facility would be on terms which are no
different from or less advantageous than
that of other participating Funds.
Applicants’ Conditions
Applicants agree that any order of the
Commission granting the requested
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
relief will be subject to the following
conditions:
1. The Interfund Loan Rate to be
charged to the Funds under the credit
facility will be the average of the Repo
Rate and the Bank Loan Rate.
2. On each business day, the Interfund
Lending Team will compare the Bank
Loan Rate with the Repo Rate and will
make cash available for Interfund Loans
only if the Interfund Loan Rate is (a)
more favorable to the lending Fund than
the Repo Rate, and (b) more favorable to
the borrowing Fund than the Bank Loan
Rate.
3. If a Fund has outstanding
borrowings, any Interfund Loans to the
Fund (a) will be at an interest rate equal
to or lower than any outstanding bank
loan; (b) will be secured at least on an
equal priority basis with at least an
equivalent percentage of collateral to
loan value as any outstanding bank loan
that requires collateral; (c) will have a
maturity no longer than any outstanding
bank loan (and in any event not over
seven days); and (d) will provide that,
if an event of default occurs under any
agreement evidencing an outstanding
bank loan to the Fund, the event of
default will automatically (without need
for action or notice by the lending Fund)
constitute an immediate event of default
under the Interfund Lending Agreement,
entitling the lending Fund to call the
Interfund Loan (and exercise all rights
with respect to any collateral) and that
such call will be made if the lending
bank exercises its right to call its loan
under its agreement with the borrowing
Fund.
4. A Fund may make an unsecured
borrowing through the credit facility if
its outstanding borrowings from all
sources immediately after the interfund
borrowing total 10% or less of its total
assets, provided that if the Fund has a
secured loan outstanding from any other
lender, including but not limited to
another Fund, the Fund’s interfund
borrowing will be secured on at least an
equal priority basis with at least an
equivalent percentage of collateral to
loan value as any outstanding loan that
requires collateral. If a Fund’s total
outstanding borrowings immediately
after an interfund borrowing would be
greater than 10% of its total assets, the
Fund may borrow through the credit
facility on a secured basis only. A Fund
may not borrow through the credit
facility or from any other source if its
total outstanding borrowings
immediately after such borrowing
would exceed the limits in section 18 of
the Act.
5. Before any Fund that has
outstanding interfund borrowings may,
through additional borrowings, cause its
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 36 / Thursday, February 24, 2005 / Notices
outstanding borrowings from all sources
to exceed 10% of its total assets, the
Fund must first secure each outstanding
Interfund Loan by the pledge of
segregated collateral with a market
value at least equal to 102% of the
outstanding principal value of the loan.
If the total outstanding borrowings of a
Fund with outstanding Interfund Loans
exceed 10% of its total assets for any
other reason (such as a decline in net
asset value or because of shareholder
redemptions), the Fund will within one
business day thereafter (a) repay all of
its outstanding Interfund Loans, (b)
reduce its outstanding indebtedness to
10% or less of its total assets, or (c)
secure each outstanding Interfund Loan
by the pledge of segregated collateral
with a market value at least equal to
102% of the outstanding principal value
of the loan until the Fund’s total
outstanding borrowings cease to exceed
10% of its total assets, at which time the
collateral called for by this condition 5
shall no longer be required. Until each
Interfund Loan that is outstanding at
any time that a Fund’s total outstanding
borrowings exceeds 10% is repaid, or
the Fund’s total outstanding borrowings
cease to exceed 10% of its total assets,
the Fund will mark the value of
collateral to market each day and will
pledge such additional collateral as is
necessary to maintain the market value
of the collateral that secures each
outstanding Interfund Loan at least
equal to 102% of the outstanding
principal value of the Interfund Loan.
6. No Fund may lend to another Fund
through the credit facility if the loan
would cause its aggregate outstanding
loans through the credit facility to
exceed 15% of the lending Fund’s
current net assets at the time of the loan.
7. A Fund’s Interfund Loans to any
one Fund will not exceed 5% of the
lending Fund’s net assets.
8. The duration of Interfund Loans
will be limited to the time required to
receive payment for securities sold, but
in no event more than seven days. Loans
effected within seven days of each other
will be treated as separate loan
transactions for purposes of this
condition.
9. Except as set forth in this
condition, no Fund may borrow through
the credit facility unless the Fund has
a policy that prevents the Fund from
borrowing for other than temporary or
emergency purposes. In the case of a
Fund that does not have such a policy,
the Fund’s borrowings through the
credit facility, as measured on the day
when the most recent loan was made,
will not exceed the greater of 125% of
the Fund’s total net cash redemptions or
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:49 Feb 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
102% of sales fails for the preceding
seven calendar days.
10. Each Interfund Loan may be called
on one business day’s notice by a
lending Fund and may be repaid on any
day by a borrowing Fund.
11. A Fund’s participation in the
credit facility must be consistent with
its investment policies and limitations
and organizational documents.
12. The Interfund Lending Team will
calculate total Fund borrowing and
lending demand through the credit
facility, and allocate loans on an
equitable basis among the Funds
without the intervention of any portfolio
manager of the Funds. The Interfund
Lending Team will not solicit cash for
the credit facility from any Fund or
prospectively publish or disseminate
loan demand data to portfolio managers.
The Interfund Lending Team will invest
any amounts remaining after satisfaction
of borrowing demand in accordance
with the standing instructions from
portfolio managers or return remaining
amounts for investment directly by the
Funds.
13. The Interfund Lending Team will
monitor the interest rates charged and
the other terms and conditions of the
Interfund Loans and will report to the
Board quarterly concerning the
participation of the Funds in the credit
facility and the terms and other
conditions of any extensions of credit
thereunder.
14. Each Fund’s Board, including a
majority of the Independent Trustees,
will (a) review no less frequently than
quarterly each Fund’s participation in
the credit facility during the preceding
quarter for compliance with the
conditions of any order permitting the
transactions; (b) establish the Bank Loan
Rate formula used to determine the
interest rate on Interfund Loans, and
review no less frequently than annually
the continuing appropriateness of the
Bank Loan Rate formula; and (c) review
no less frequently than annually the
continuing appropriateness of each
Fund’s participation in the credit
facility.
15. In the event an Interfund Loan is
not paid according to its terms and the
default is not cured within two business
days from its maturity or from the time
the lending Fund makes a demand for
payment under the provisions of the
Interfund Lending Agreement, the
Interfund Lending Team will promptly
refer the loan for arbitration to an
independent arbitrator, selected by the
Board of any Fund involved in the loan,
who will serve as arbitrator of disputes
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9121
concerning Interfund Loans.3 The
arbitrator will resolve any problem
promptly, and the arbitrator’s decision
will be binding on both Funds. The
arbitrator will submit at least annually
a written report to the Board of each
Fund setting forth a description of the
nature of any dispute and the actions
taken by the Funds to resolve the
dispute.
16. Each Fund will maintain and
preserve for a period of not less than six
years from the end of the fiscal year in
which any transaction under the credit
facility occurred, the first two years in
an easily accessible place, written
records of all such transactions, setting
forth a description of the terms of the
transaction, including the amount, the
maturity and the rate of interest on the
loan, the rate of interest available at the
time on short-term repurchase
agreements and bank borrowings, and
such other information presented to the
Board in connection with the review
required by conditions 13 and 14.
17. The Interfund Lending Team will
prepare and submit to the Board for
review an initial report describing the
operations of the credit facility and the
procedures to be implemented to ensure
that all the Funds are treated fairly.
After the commencement of the
operations of the credit facility, the
Interfund Lending Team will report on
the operations of the credit facility at
each Board’s quarterly meetings.
In addition, for two years following
the commencement of the credit facility,
the independent public accountant for
each Fund shall prepare an annual
report that evaluates the Interfund
Lending Team’s assertion that it has
established procedures reasonably
designed to achieve compliance with
the conditions of the order. The report
shall be prepared in accordance with
the Statements on Standards for
Attestation Engagements No. 10 and it
shall be filed pursuant to item 77Q3 of
Form N–SAR, as such Statements or
Form may be revised, amended, or
superseded from time to time. In
particular, the report shall address
procedures designed to achieve the
following objectives: (a) That the
Interfund Loan Rate will be higher than
the Repo Rate, but lower than the Bank
Loan Rate; (b) compliance with the
collateral requirements as set forth in
the application; (c) compliance with the
percentage limitations on interfund
borrowing and lending; (d) allocation of
interfund borrowing and lending
3 If a dispute involves Funds with separate
Boards, the Board of each Fund will select an
independent arbitrator that is satisfactory to each
Fund.
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
9122
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 36 / Thursday, February 24, 2005 / Notices
demand in an equitable manner and in
accordance with procedures established
by the Board; and (e) that the interest
rate on any Interfund Loan does not
exceed the interest rate on any third
party borrowings of a borrowing Fund at
the time of the Interfund Loan.
After the final report is filed, the
Fund’s external auditors, in connection
with their Fund audit examinations,
will continue to review the operation of
the credit facility for compliance with
the conditions of the application and
their review will form the basis, in part,
of the auditor’s report on internal
accounting controls in Form N–SAR.
18. No Fund will participate in the
credit facility upon receipt of requisite
regulatory approval unless it has fully
disclosed in its SAI all material facts
about its intended participation.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–766 Filed 2–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–51221; File No. SR–NASD–
2005–018]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Permit Foreign Private
Issuers To Follow Certain Home
Country Practices
February 17, 2005.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January
31, 2005, the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’),
through its subsidiary, the Nasdaq Stock
Market, Inc. (‘‘Nasdaq’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in items I, II, and
III below, which items have been
prepared by Nasdaq. Nasdaq filed the
proposed rule change pursuant to
section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder,4 which renders
it effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
2 17
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:49 Feb 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Nasdaq proposes to modify NASD
Rule 4350(a)(1) and (5) and Interpretive
Material (‘‘IM’’) 4350–6(1) to permit
foreign private issuers to follow certain
home country practices.
The text of the proposed rule change
is below. Proposed new language is in
italics; proposed deletions are in
[brackets].
4350. Qualitative Listing Requirements
for Nasdaq National Market and Nasdaq
Small Cap Market Issuers Except for
Limited Partnerships
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Applicability
(1) Foreign Private Issuers. [Nasdaq
shall have the ability to provide
exemptions from Rule 4350 to a foreign
private issuer when provisions of this
Rule are contrary to a law, rule or
regulation of any public authority
exercising jurisdiction over such issuer
or contrary to generally accepted
business practices in the issuer’s
country of domicile, except to the extent
that such exemptions would be contrary
to the federal securities laws, including
without limitation those rules required
by Section 10A(m) of the Act and Rule
10A–3 thereunder. A foreign issuer that
receives an exemption under this
subsection] A foreign private issuer may
follow its home country practice in lieu
of the requirements of Rule 4350,
provided, however, that such an issuer
shall: comply with Rules 4350(b)(1)(B),
4350(j) and 4350(m), have an audit
committee that satisfies Rule 4350(d)(3),
and ensure that such audit committee’s
members meet the independence
requirement in Rule 4350(d)(2)(A)(ii). A
foreign private issuer that follows a
home country practice in lieu of one or
more provisions of Rule 4350 shall
disclose in its annual reports filed with
the Commission each requirement of
Rule 4350 that it does not follow [from
which it is exempted] and describe the
home country practice[, if any,]
followed by the issuer in lieu of such
requirements. In addition, a foreign
private issuer making its initial public
offering or first U.S. listing on Nasdaq
shall [disclose any such exemptions]
make the same disclosures in its
registration statement.
(2) through (4) No change.
(5) Effective Dates/Transition. In order
to allow companies to make necessary
adjustments in the course of their
regular annual meeting schedule, and
consistent with SEC Rule 10A–3, Rules
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4200 and 4350 are effective as set out in
this subsection. During the transition
period between November 4, 2003 and
the effective date of Rules 4200 and
4350, companies that have not brought
themselves into compliance with these
Rules shall continue to comply with
Rules 4200–1 and 4350–1, which
consist of sunsetting sections of
previously existing Rules 4200 and
4350.
The provisions of Rule 4200(a) and
Rule 4350(c), (d) and (m) regarding
director independence, independent
committees, and notification of
noncompliance shall be implemented
by the following dates:
• July 31, 2005 for foreign private
issuers and small business issuers (as
defined in SEC Rule 12b–2); and
• For all other listed issuers, by the
earlier of: (1) The listed issuer’s first
annual shareholders meeting after
January 15, 2004; or (2) October 31,
2004.
In the case of an issuer with a
staggered board, with the exception of
the audit committee requirements, the
issuer shall have until their second
annual meeting after January 15, 2004,
but not later than December 31, 2005, to
implement all new requirements
relating to board composition, if the
issuer would be required to change a
director who would not normally stand
for election at an earlier annual meeting.
Such issuers shall comply with the
audit committee requirements pursuant
to the implementation schedule bulleted
above.
A company listing in connection with
its initial public offering shall be
permitted to phase in its compliance
with the independent committee
requirements set forth in Rule 4350(c)
on the same schedule as it is permitted
to phase in its compliance with the
independent audit committee
requirement pursuant to SEC Rule 10A–
3(b)(1)(iv)(A). Accordingly, a company
listing in connection with its initial
public offering shall be permitted to
phase in its compliance with the
independent committee requirements
set forth in Rule 4350(c) as follows: (1)
One independent member at the time of
listing; (2) a majority of independent
members within 90 days of listing; and
(3) all independent members within one
year of listing. Furthermore, a company
listing in connection with its initial
public offering shall have twelve
months from the date of listing to
comply with the majority independent
board requirement in Rule 4350(c). It
should be noted, however, that pursuant
to SEC Rule 10A–3(b)(1)(iii) investment
companies are not afforded the
exemptions under SEC Rule 10A–
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 36 (Thursday, February 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9117-9122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-766]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No. 26762; 812-12823]
SEI Institutional Managed Trust, et al.; Notice of Application
February 17, 2005.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice of application for an order under the Investment Company
Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') under (i) section 6(c) of the Act granting an
exemption from sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act; (ii) section
12(d)(1)(J) of the Act granting an exemption from section 12(d)(1) of
the Act; (iii) sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act granting an exemption
from sections 17(a)(1) and 17(a)(3) of the Act; and (iv) section 17(d)
of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act to permit certain joint
transactions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of Application: Applicants request an order that would permit
certain registered management investment companies to participate in a
joint lending and borrowing facility.
Applicants: SEI Investments Management Corporation (``SIMC'') and any
person controlling, controlled by or under common control with SIMC
(together with SIMC, the ``Advisers''); SEI Investments Fund Management
(``SEI Management,'' and together with SIMC, ``SEI''); SEI
Institutional Managed Trust, SEI Institutional Investments Trust, SEI
Institutional International Trust, SEI Index Funds, SEI Asset
Allocation Trust, SEI Liquid Asset Trust, SEI Daily Income Trust, SEI
Tax Exempt Trust (each, a ``Trust'' and collectively, the ``Trusts''),
for and on behalf of each of their series now or hereafter existing
(collectively, the ``SEI Funds'').
Filing Dates: The application was filed on May 16, 2002, and amended on
February 2, 2005.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the application
will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested
persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's Secretary
and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by
mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30
p.m. on March 14, 2005, and should be accompanied by proof of service
on the applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a
certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of the
writer's interest, the reason for the request, and the issues
contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request
notification by writing to the Commission's Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
20549-0609; Applicants, c/o Timothy D. Barto, Esq., SEI Investments,
One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, PA 19456.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith A. Gregory, Senior Counsel, at
(202) 551-6815 or Mary Kay Frech, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-6621
(Division of Investment Management, Office of Investment Company
Regulation).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee at the
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 450 Fifth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20549-0102 (tel. (202) 942-8090).
[[Page 9118]]
Applicants' Representations
1. Each Trust is registered under the Act as an open-end management
investment company and is organized as a Massachusetts business
trust.\1\ Each Trust offers multiple Funds. The Funds of the Trusts are
all in the same group of investment companies as defined in section
12(d)(1)(G)(ii) of the Act. SIMC is registered as an investment adviser
under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and serves as investment
adviser to certain SEI Funds. SIMC is the owner of all beneficial
interest in SEI Management, which provides the SEI Funds with overall
administrative services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Applicants request that the relief also apply to any other
existing or future registered management investment company or
series thereof (i) that is advised by SIMC or its successors or
another Adviser or (ii) for which SEI Investments Distribution Co.
(``SIDCo.'') (or its successors) serves as principal underwriter or
for which SEI Management (or its successors) serves as the
administrator and which is part of the same group of investment
companies (as defined in section 12(d)(1)(G)(ii) of the Act) as the
Trusts (collectively, the ``Future Funds'' and together with the SEI
Funds, the ``Funds''). ``Successor'' means any entity that results
from a reorganization into another jurisdiction or a change in the
type of business organization. All existing Funds that currently
intend to rely on the requested order are named as applicants. Any
other existing and Future Funds that may rely on the relief in the
future will do so only in accordance with the terms and conditions
of the application. For Funds that are not advised by SIMC, SEI
Management (as the Funds' administrator), SIDCo. (as the Funds'
distributor) and/or the Board (as defined below) will be responsible
for such Funds' compliance with the terms and conditions of the
application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Some Funds may lend money to banks or other entities by entering
into repurchase agreements or purchasing other short-term instruments.
Other Funds may need to borrow money from the same or similar banks for
temporary purposes to satisfy redemption requests, to cover
unanticipated cash shortfalls such as a trade ``fail'' in which cash
payment for a security sold by a Fund has been delayed, or for other
temporary purposes. Currently, the SEI Funds have uncommitted lines of
credit with various banks and overdraft protection provided by their
custodian bank.
3. If a Fund were to borrow money through its line of credit or
incur an overdraft with its custodian bank, the Fund would pay interest
on the borrowed cash at a rate that would be higher than the rate that
other non-borrowing Funds would earn on repurchase agreements and other
short-term instruments of the same maturity as the bank loan.
Applicants state that this differential represents the bank's profit
for serving as a middleman between a borrower and a lender. Other bank
loan arrangements, such as committed lines of credit, would require the
Funds to pay substantial commitment fees in addition to the interest
rate to be paid by the borrowing Fund.
4. Applicants request an order that would permit the Funds to enter
into master interfund lending agreements (``Interfund Lending
Agreements'') under which the Funds would lend and borrow money for
temporary purposes directly to and from each other through a credit
facility (an ``Interfund Loan'').\2\ Applicants believe that the
proposed credit facility would reduce the Funds' potential borrowing
costs and enhance their ability to earn higher rates of interest on
short-term lendings. Although the proposed credit facility would reduce
the Open-End Funds' need to borrow from banks, the Open-End Funds would
be free to establish committed lines of credit or other borrowing
arrangements with banks. The Funds also would continue to maintain
their existing uncommitted lines of credit and overdraft protection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Applicants represent that any open-end Fund (an ``Open-End
Fund'') may participate in the proposed credit facility as either a
borrower or a lender. Applicants further represent that any closed-
end Fund that participates in the proposed credit facility would
only participate as a lender.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Applicants anticipate that the credit facility will provide a
borrowing Fund with significant cost savings when the cash position of
the Fund is insufficient to meet temporary cash requirements. This
situation could arise when redemptions exceed anticipated volumes and
the Fund has insufficient cash on hand to satisfy such redemptions.
When a Fund liquidates portfolio securities to meet redemption
requests, it often does not receive payment in settlement for up to
three days (or longer for certain foreign transactions). The credit
facility would provide a source of immediate, short-term liquidity
pending settlement of the sale of portfolio securities.
6. Applicants also propose using the credit facility when a sale of
portfolio securities fails due to circumstances beyond the Fund's
control, such as a delay in the delivery of cash to the Fund's
custodian or improper delivery instructions by the broker effecting the
transaction. Sales fails may present a cash shortfall if the Fund has
undertaken to purchase a security with the proceeds from securities
sold. When the Fund experiences a cash shortfall due to a sales fail,
the custodian typically extends temporary credit to cover the shortfall
and the Fund incurs overdraft charges. Alternatively, the Fund could
fail on its intended purchase due to lack of funds from the previous
sale, resulting in additional costs to the Fund, or sell a security on
a same day settlement basis, earning a lower return on the investment.
Use of the credit facility under these circumstances would enable the
Fund to have access to immediate short-term liquidity without incurring
custodian overdraft or other charges.
7. While bank borrowings could generally supply needed cash to
cover unanticipated redemptions and sales fails, under the credit
facility, a borrowing Fund would pay lower interest rates than those
offered by banks on short-term loans. In addition, Funds making short-
term cash loans directly to other Funds would earn interest at a rate
higher than they otherwise could obtain from investing their cash in
repurchase agreements. Thus, applicants believe that the credit
facility would benefit both borrowing and lending Funds.
8. The interest rate charged to the Funds on any loan (the
``Interfund Loan Rate'') would be determined daily and would be the
average of the Repo Rate and the Bank Loan Rate, both as defined below.
The Repo Rate on any day would be the highest rate available to the
Funds from investments in overnight repurchase agreements, either
directly or through a joint account. The Bank Loan Rate for any day
would be calculated by the Interfund Lending Team (as defined below)
each day an Interfund Loan is made according to a formula established
by a Fund's board of trustees (``Board'') designed to approximate the
lowest interest rate at which short-term bank loans would be available
to the Funds. The formula would be based upon a publicly available rate
(e.g., Federal funds plus 25 basis points) and would vary with this
rate so as to reflect changing bank loan rates. Each Board periodically
would review the continuing appropriateness of using the publicly
available rate to determine the Bank Loan Rate, as well as the
relationship between the Bank Loan Rate and current bank loan rates
that would be available to the Funds. The initial formula and any
subsequent modifications to the formula would be subject to the
approval of each Fund's Board.
9. Employees of SEI (the ``Interfund Lending Team'') would
administer the credit facility. The Interfund Lending Team may include
representative employees of SEI Management's Fund Accounting
Department, a unit of SEI Management responsible for providing
valuation and fund accounting services to the Funds, as well as SIMC
investment professionals and other personnel from SEI Management. The
[[Page 9119]]
Interfund Lending Team will not include any portfolio managers of a
Fund. Under the credit facility, the portfolio managers for each
participating Fund could provide standing instructions to participate
as a borrower or lender. On each business day, the Interfund Lending
Team would collect data on the uninvested cash and borrowing
requirements of all participating Funds from the Funds' custodian. Once
it had determined the aggregate amount of cash available for loans and
borrowing demand, the Interfund Lending Team would allocate loans among
borrowing Funds without any further communication from portfolio
managers. It is expected that there typically will be far more
available uninvested cash each day than borrowing demand. After the
Interfund Lending Team has allocated cash for Interfund Loans, the
Interfund Lending Team will invest any remaining cash in accordance
with the standing instructions of portfolio managers or return
remaining amounts for investment directly by the Funds.
10. The Interfund Lending Team would allocate borrowing demand and
cash available for lending among the Funds on what the Interfund
Lending Team believes to be an equitable basis, subject to certain
administrative procedures applicable to all Funds, such as the time of
filing requests to participate; minimum loan lot sizes; and the need to
minimize the number of transactions and associated administrative
costs. To reduce transaction costs, each loan normally would be
allocated in a manner intended to minimize the number of participants
necessary to complete the loan transaction. The method of allocation
and related administrative procedures would be approved by each Board,
including a majority of trustees who are not ``interested persons'' of
the Fund, as defined in section 2(a)(19) of the Act (``Independent
Trustees''), to ensure that both borrowing and lending Funds
participate on an equitable basis.
11. The Interfund Lending Team would (a) monitor the interest rates
charged and the other terms and conditions of the loans, (b) limit the
borrowings and loans entered into by each Fund to ensure that they
comply with the Fund's investment policies and limitations, (c) ensure
equitable treatment of each Fund, and (d) make quarterly reports to the
Boards concerning any transactions by the Funds under the credit
facility and the interest rates charged.
12. SEI Management and SIMC would administer the credit facility
under their existing administration agreement and advisory agreement,
respectively, with each Fund and would receive no additional fee as
compensation for their services. SEI Management could, however, collect
reimbursement for standard pricing, record keeping, bookkeeping, and
accounting costs applicable to repurchase and lending transactions
generally, including transactions effected through the credit facility.
Fees for these services would be no higher than those applicable for
comparable bank loan transactions. With respect to Funds for which
SIDCo. serves as principal underwriter and which have no other
connection to SEI, SEI Management and SIMC will administer the credit
facility pursuant to a written contract which describes the credit
facility administration services and requires that such services be
provided in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the
application. The written contract also will provide that SEI Management
and SIMC will receive no fee for these services.
13. Each Fund's participation in the credit facility is consistent
with its organizational documents and its investment policies and
limitations. The Statement of Additional Information (``SAI'') of each
Fund discloses the individual borrowing and lending limitations of the
Fund. The SAI of each Fund participating in the credit facility will
disclose all material information about the credit facility.
14. In connection with the proposed credit facility, applicants
request an order under (a) section 6(c) of the Act granting relief from
sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act; (b) section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act
granting relief from section 12(d)(1) of the Act; (c) sections 6(c) and
17(b) of the Act granting relief from sections 17(a)(1) and 17(a)(3) of
the Act; and (d) section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act
to permit certain joint arrangements.
Applicants' Legal Analysis
1. Section 17(a)(3) of the Act generally prohibits any affiliated
person, or affiliated person of an affiliated person, from borrowing
money or other property from a registered investment company. Section
21(b) of the Act generally prohibits any registered management
investment company from lending money or other property to any person
if that person controls or is under common control with the company.
Section 2(a)(3)(C) of the Act defines ``affiliated person'' of another
person, in part, to be any person directly or indirectly controlling,
controlled by, or under common control with, such other person.
Applicants state that the Funds may be under common control by virtue
of having SIMC as their common investment adviser and/or by virtue of
SEI's sponsorship and significant involvement with the Funds and due to
the Funds' common Board.
2. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that an exemptive order may be
granted where an exemption is necessary or appropriate in the public
interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act.
Section 17(b) authorizes the Commission to exempt a proposed
transaction from section 17(a) of the Act provided that the terms of
the transaction, including the consideration to be paid or received,
are fair and reasonable and do not involve overreaching on the part of
any person concerned, and the transaction is consistent with the policy
of the investment company as recited in its registration statement and
with the general purposes of the Act. Applicants believe that the
proposed arrangements satisfy these standards for the reasons discussed
below.
3. Applicants submit that sections 17(a)(3) and 21(b) were intended
to prevent a person with strong potential adverse interests to, and
some influence over the investment decisions of, a registered
investment company from causing or inducing the investment company to
engage in lending transactions that unfairly inure to the benefit of
that person and that are detrimental to the best interests of the
investment company and its shareholders. Applicants assert that the
proposed credit facility transactions do not raise these concerns
because (a) SIMC would administer the program as a disinterested
fiduciary with respect to Funds it advises and as a disinterested party
with respect to Funds it does not advise; (b) all Interfund Loans would
consist only of uninvested cash reserves that the Funds otherwise would
invest in short-term repurchase agreements or other short-term
instruments; (c) the Interfund Loans would not involve a greater risk
than such other investments; (d) a lending Fund would receive interest
at a rate higher than it could obtain through such other investments;
and (e) a borrowing Fund would pay interest at a rate lower than
otherwise available to it under its bank loan agreements and avoid the
up-front commitment fees associated with committed lines of credit.
Moreover, applicants believe that the other conditions in the
application would effectively preclude the possibility of any Fund
obtaining an undue advantage over any other Fund.
[[Page 9120]]
4. Section 17(a)(1) of the Act generally prohibits an affiliated
person of a registered investment company, or an affiliated person of
an affiliated person, from selling any securities or other property to
the company. Section 12(d)(1) of the Act generally makes it unlawful
for a registered investment company to purchase or otherwise acquire
any security issued by any other investment company except in
accordance with the limitations set forth in that section. Applicants
state that the obligation of a borrowing Fund to repay an Interfund
Loan may constitute a security under sections 17(a)(1) and 12(d)(1).
Section 12(d)(1)(J) provides that an exemptive order may be granted by
the Commission from any provision of section 12(d)(1) if and to the
extent such exemption is consistent with the public interest and the
protection of investors. Applicants contend that the standards under
sections 6(c), 17(b) and 12(d)(1)(J) are satisfied for all the reasons
set forth above in support of their request for relief from sections
17(a)(3) and 21(b) and for the reasons discussed below.
5. Applicants state that section 12(d)(1) was intended to prevent
the pyramiding of investment companies in order to avoid duplicative
costs and fees attendant upon multiple layers of investment companies.
Applicants submit that the proposed credit facility does not involve
these abuses. Applicants note that there would be no duplicative costs
or fees to the Funds or shareholders, and that the Interfund Lending
Team would administer the credit facility under SEI Management's and
SIMC's existing management and advisory agreements, respectively, with
the Funds, and would receive no additional compensation for its
services. With respect to Funds for which SIDCo. serves as principal
underwriter and which have no other connection to SEI, SEI Management
and SIMC will administer the credit facility pursuant to a written
contract which describes the credit facility administration services
and requires that such services be provided in accordance with the
terms and conditions set forth in the application. The written contract
also will provide that SEI Management and SIMC will receive no fee for
these services. Applicants also note that the purpose of the proposed
credit facility is to provide economic benefits for all the
participating Funds.
6. Section 18(f)(1) of the Act prohibits open-end investment
companies from issuing any senior security except that a company is
permitted to borrow from any bank; provided that, immediately after the
borrowing, there is an asset coverage of at least 300 per centum for
all borrowings of the company. Under section 18(g) of the Act, the term
``senior security'' includes any bond, debenture, note, or similar
obligation or instrument constituting a security and evidencing
indebtedness. Applicants request exemptive relief from section 18(f)(1)
to the limited extent necessary to implement the credit facility
(because the lending Funds are not banks).
7. Applicants believe that granting the relief under section 6(c)
is appropriate because the borrowing Funds would remain subject to the
requirement of section 18(f)(1) that all borrowings of the Fund,
including combined interfund and bank borrowings, have at least 300%
asset coverage. Based on the conditions and safeguards described in the
application, applicants also submit that to allow the Funds to borrow
from other Funds pursuant to the proposed credit facility is consistent
with the purposes and policies of section 18(f)(1).
8. Section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 thereunder generally
prohibit any affiliated person of a registered investment company, or
affiliated persons of an affiliated person, when acting as principal,
from effecting any joint transaction unless the transaction is approved
by the Commission. Rule 17d-1(b) under the Act provides that in passing
upon applications for exemptive relief, the Commission will consider
whether the participation of a registered investment company in a joint
enterprise on the basis proposed is consistent with the provisions,
policies and purposes of the Act and the extent to which the company's
participation is on a basis different from or less advantageous than
that of other participants.
9. Applicants submit that the purpose of section 17(d) is to avoid
overreaching by an unfair advantage to investment company insiders.
Applicants believe that the credit facility is consistent with the
provisions, policies and purposes of the Act in that it offers both
reduced borrowing costs and enhanced returns on loaned funds to all
participating Funds and their shareholders. Applicants note that each
Fund would have an equal opportunity to borrow and lend on equal terms
consistent with its investment policies and limitations. Applicants
therefore believe that each Fund's participation in the credit facility
would be on terms which are no different from or less advantageous than
that of other participating Funds.
Applicants' Conditions
Applicants agree that any order of the Commission granting the
requested relief will be subject to the following conditions:
1. The Interfund Loan Rate to be charged to the Funds under the
credit facility will be the average of the Repo Rate and the Bank Loan
Rate.
2. On each business day, the Interfund Lending Team will compare
the Bank Loan Rate with the Repo Rate and will make cash available for
Interfund Loans only if the Interfund Loan Rate is (a) more favorable
to the lending Fund than the Repo Rate, and (b) more favorable to the
borrowing Fund than the Bank Loan Rate.
3. If a Fund has outstanding borrowings, any Interfund Loans to the
Fund (a) will be at an interest rate equal to or lower than any
outstanding bank loan; (b) will be secured at least on an equal
priority basis with at least an equivalent percentage of collateral to
loan value as any outstanding bank loan that requires collateral; (c)
will have a maturity no longer than any outstanding bank loan (and in
any event not over seven days); and (d) will provide that, if an event
of default occurs under any agreement evidencing an outstanding bank
loan to the Fund, the event of default will automatically (without need
for action or notice by the lending Fund) constitute an immediate event
of default under the Interfund Lending Agreement, entitling the lending
Fund to call the Interfund Loan (and exercise all rights with respect
to any collateral) and that such call will be made if the lending bank
exercises its right to call its loan under its agreement with the
borrowing Fund.
4. A Fund may make an unsecured borrowing through the credit
facility if its outstanding borrowings from all sources immediately
after the interfund borrowing total 10% or less of its total assets,
provided that if the Fund has a secured loan outstanding from any other
lender, including but not limited to another Fund, the Fund's interfund
borrowing will be secured on at least an equal priority basis with at
least an equivalent percentage of collateral to loan value as any
outstanding loan that requires collateral. If a Fund's total
outstanding borrowings immediately after an interfund borrowing would
be greater than 10% of its total assets, the Fund may borrow through
the credit facility on a secured basis only. A Fund may not borrow
through the credit facility or from any other source if its total
outstanding borrowings immediately after such borrowing would exceed
the limits in section 18 of the Act.
5. Before any Fund that has outstanding interfund borrowings may,
through additional borrowings, cause its
[[Page 9121]]
outstanding borrowings from all sources to exceed 10% of its total
assets, the Fund must first secure each outstanding Interfund Loan by
the pledge of segregated collateral with a market value at least equal
to 102% of the outstanding principal value of the loan. If the total
outstanding borrowings of a Fund with outstanding Interfund Loans
exceed 10% of its total assets for any other reason (such as a decline
in net asset value or because of shareholder redemptions), the Fund
will within one business day thereafter (a) repay all of its
outstanding Interfund Loans, (b) reduce its outstanding indebtedness to
10% or less of its total assets, or (c) secure each outstanding
Interfund Loan by the pledge of segregated collateral with a market
value at least equal to 102% of the outstanding principal value of the
loan until the Fund's total outstanding borrowings cease to exceed 10%
of its total assets, at which time the collateral called for by this
condition 5 shall no longer be required. Until each Interfund Loan that
is outstanding at any time that a Fund's total outstanding borrowings
exceeds 10% is repaid, or the Fund's total outstanding borrowings cease
to exceed 10% of its total assets, the Fund will mark the value of
collateral to market each day and will pledge such additional
collateral as is necessary to maintain the market value of the
collateral that secures each outstanding Interfund Loan at least equal
to 102% of the outstanding principal value of the Interfund Loan.
6. No Fund may lend to another Fund through the credit facility if
the loan would cause its aggregate outstanding loans through the credit
facility to exceed 15% of the lending Fund's current net assets at the
time of the loan.
7. A Fund's Interfund Loans to any one Fund will not exceed 5% of
the lending Fund's net assets.
8. The duration of Interfund Loans will be limited to the time
required to receive payment for securities sold, but in no event more
than seven days. Loans effected within seven days of each other will be
treated as separate loan transactions for purposes of this condition.
9. Except as set forth in this condition, no Fund may borrow
through the credit facility unless the Fund has a policy that prevents
the Fund from borrowing for other than temporary or emergency purposes.
In the case of a Fund that does not have such a policy, the Fund's
borrowings through the credit facility, as measured on the day when the
most recent loan was made, will not exceed the greater of 125% of the
Fund's total net cash redemptions or 102% of sales fails for the
preceding seven calendar days.
10. Each Interfund Loan may be called on one business day's notice
by a lending Fund and may be repaid on any day by a borrowing Fund.
11. A Fund's participation in the credit facility must be
consistent with its investment policies and limitations and
organizational documents.
12. The Interfund Lending Team will calculate total Fund borrowing
and lending demand through the credit facility, and allocate loans on
an equitable basis among the Funds without the intervention of any
portfolio manager of the Funds. The Interfund Lending Team will not
solicit cash for the credit facility from any Fund or prospectively
publish or disseminate loan demand data to portfolio managers. The
Interfund Lending Team will invest any amounts remaining after
satisfaction of borrowing demand in accordance with the standing
instructions from portfolio managers or return remaining amounts for
investment directly by the Funds.
13. The Interfund Lending Team will monitor the interest rates
charged and the other terms and conditions of the Interfund Loans and
will report to the Board quarterly concerning the participation of the
Funds in the credit facility and the terms and other conditions of any
extensions of credit thereunder.
14. Each Fund's Board, including a majority of the Independent
Trustees, will (a) review no less frequently than quarterly each Fund's
participation in the credit facility during the preceding quarter for
compliance with the conditions of any order permitting the
transactions; (b) establish the Bank Loan Rate formula used to
determine the interest rate on Interfund Loans, and review no less
frequently than annually the continuing appropriateness of the Bank
Loan Rate formula; and (c) review no less frequently than annually the
continuing appropriateness of each Fund's participation in the credit
facility.
15. In the event an Interfund Loan is not paid according to its
terms and the default is not cured within two business days from its
maturity or from the time the lending Fund makes a demand for payment
under the provisions of the Interfund Lending Agreement, the Interfund
Lending Team will promptly refer the loan for arbitration to an
independent arbitrator, selected by the Board of any Fund involved in
the loan, who will serve as arbitrator of disputes concerning Interfund
Loans.\3\ The arbitrator will resolve any problem promptly, and the
arbitrator's decision will be binding on both Funds. The arbitrator
will submit at least annually a written report to the Board of each
Fund setting forth a description of the nature of any dispute and the
actions taken by the Funds to resolve the dispute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ If a dispute involves Funds with separate Boards, the Board
of each Fund will select an independent arbitrator that is
satisfactory to each Fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
16. Each Fund will maintain and preserve for a period of not less
than six years from the end of the fiscal year in which any transaction
under the credit facility occurred, the first two years in an easily
accessible place, written records of all such transactions, setting
forth a description of the terms of the transaction, including the
amount, the maturity and the rate of interest on the loan, the rate of
interest available at the time on short-term repurchase agreements and
bank borrowings, and such other information presented to the Board in
connection with the review required by conditions 13 and 14.
17. The Interfund Lending Team will prepare and submit to the Board
for review an initial report describing the operations of the credit
facility and the procedures to be implemented to ensure that all the
Funds are treated fairly. After the commencement of the operations of
the credit facility, the Interfund Lending Team will report on the
operations of the credit facility at each Board's quarterly meetings.
In addition, for two years following the commencement of the credit
facility, the independent public accountant for each Fund shall prepare
an annual report that evaluates the Interfund Lending Team's assertion
that it has established procedures reasonably designed to achieve
compliance with the conditions of the order. The report shall be
prepared in accordance with the Statements on Standards for Attestation
Engagements No. 10 and it shall be filed pursuant to item 77Q3 of Form
N-SAR, as such Statements or Form may be revised, amended, or
superseded from time to time. In particular, the report shall address
procedures designed to achieve the following objectives: (a) That the
Interfund Loan Rate will be higher than the Repo Rate, but lower than
the Bank Loan Rate; (b) compliance with the collateral requirements as
set forth in the application; (c) compliance with the percentage
limitations on interfund borrowing and lending; (d) allocation of
interfund borrowing and lending
[[Page 9122]]
demand in an equitable manner and in accordance with procedures
established by the Board; and (e) that the interest rate on any
Interfund Loan does not exceed the interest rate on any third party
borrowings of a borrowing Fund at the time of the Interfund Loan.
After the final report is filed, the Fund's external auditors, in
connection with their Fund audit examinations, will continue to review
the operation of the credit facility for compliance with the conditions
of the application and their review will form the basis, in part, of
the auditor's report on internal accounting controls in Form N-SAR.
18. No Fund will participate in the credit facility upon receipt of
requisite regulatory approval unless it has fully disclosed in its SAI
all material facts about its intended participation.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-766 Filed 2-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P