Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Securities Clearing Corporation; Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Standards of Financial Responsibility Required of Mutual Fund and Insurance Services Applicants and Members that Are Banks, Trust Companies, or Broker-Dealers, 8121-8123 [E5-655]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 32 / Thursday, February 17, 2005 / Notices
burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Exchange Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing proposed rule change
(1) does not significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) does not impose any
significant burden on competition; and
(3) by its terms, does not become
operative until 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest.
Furthermore, the Exchange provided the
Commission with written notice of its
intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text
of the proposed rule change, at least five
business days prior to the date of filing
of the proposed rule change.
Consequently, the proposed rule change
has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 12 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.13
The Exchange has requested that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative
delay. The Commission believes that
waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The
Commission notes that the proposal to
amend CBOE Rule 6.25 by adding a
provision relating to erroneous quotes in
the underlying market is substantially
similar to provisions contained in CBOE
Rules 24.16(a)(5) and 43.5 and to a
provision that was previously contained
in CBOE Rule 6.25. Thus, the
Commission does not believe that the
proposed rule change raises any new
issues. For these reasons, the
Commission designates the proposal to
be effective and operative upon filing
with the Commission.14
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of this proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
12 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
14 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
13 17
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:41 Feb 16, 2005
Jkt 205001
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2005–12 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
20549–0609.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2005–12. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Section, 450 Fifth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of CBOE. All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2005–12 and should be submitted on or
before March 10, 2005.
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8121
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–656 Filed 2–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–51174; File No. SR–NSCC–
2003–22]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Securities Clearing
Corporation; Order Granting Approval
of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
the Standards of Financial
Responsibility Required of Mutual
Fund and Insurance Services
Applicants and Members that Are
Banks, Trust Companies, or BrokerDealers
February 9, 2005.
I. Introduction
On November 10, 2003, the National
Securities Clearing Corporation
(‘‘NSCC’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
and on November 29, 2004, amended
proposed rule change File No. SR–
NSCC–2003–22 pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’).1 Notice of the proposed
rule change was published in the
Federal Register on December 13,
2004.2 No comment letters were
received. For the reasons discussed
below, the Commission is now granting
approval of the proposed rule change.
II. Description
The proposed rule change amends
Addendum B, ‘‘Standards of Financial
Responsibility and Operational
Capability,’’ and Addendum I,
‘‘Standards of Financial Responsibility
and Operational Capability For Fund
Members,’’ of NSCC’s Rules and
Procedures to enhance the standards of
financial responsibility required of
applicants and members that are banks,
trust companies, and broker-dealers
using or applying to use NSCC’s nonguaranteed services as Mutual Fund/
Insurance Services Members under Rule
2 and Fund Members under Rule 51.3
Addendum B establishes financial
criteria applicable to Mutual Fund/
Insurance Services Members and
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50797
(December 6, 2004), 69 FR 72238.
3 Mutual Fund Services and Insurance Processing
Services are non-guaranteed services.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\17FEN1.SGM
17FEN1
8122
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 32 / Thursday, February 17, 2005 / Notices
applicants admitted or seeking
admission under Rule 2. Addendum I
establishes the financial criteria
applicable to Fund Members and
applicants admitted or seeking
admission under Rule 51.
The proposed rule change (i) raises
the minimum excess net capital
requirement applicable to such brokerdealer applicants and members from
$25,000 to $50,000 and (ii) changes the
standards of financial responsibility
required of banks and trust companies
by referring to different types of criteria
than are currently used for this purpose.
The effective date for the proposed rule
change as applied to current members is
one year from the date of Commission
approval. The one year period, arrived
at after consultations with the affected
members, is necessary to allow members
that do not meet the increased or
changed capital requirements sufficient
time to evaluate their options and
implement any necessary changes
without undue disruption to their
customers. The proposed rule change
also amends Addendum I to require an
established business history of six
months instead of three years which is
consistent with the required established
business history for applicants for other
types of membership in NSCC.
1. Increase of Minimum Excess Net
Capital Required of Broker-Dealers
Using Mutual Fund and Insurance
Services
NSCC’s current minimum excess net
capital requirement applicable to
broker-dealer applicants and members
using non-guaranteed services was
implemented in 1993.4 In 1998, NSCC
increased its minimum excess net
capital requirements under Rule 2 for
broker-dealer applicants and members
using NSCC guaranteed services from
$50,000 to $500,000 subject to certain
limited exceptions.5 At that time, no
change was made to the financial
requirements applicable to the use of
non-guaranteed services. NSCC now
believes it is appropriate to do so
because of increased transaction
volumes and settlement obligations.
NSCC currently has 290 broker-dealer
members to which the increased excess
net capital requirement will apply.
Thirteen of the 290 broker-dealer
members have been identified as not
meeting the increased capital
4 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 33525
(January 26, 1994), 59 FR 9805.
5 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 40081
(June 10, 1998), 63 FR 32905. A municipal
securities broker under Rule 15c3–1(a)(8) of the Act
is required to maintain $100,000 in excess net
capital, and a clearing broker is required to
maintain $1,000,000 in excess net capital.
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:41 Feb 16, 2005
Jkt 205001
requirement. The purpose of delaying
effectiveness of the proposed rule
change is to allow these thirteen
members time in which to obtain and
apply additional excess net capital or to
make alternate arrangements, such as
clearing through another NSCC member,
without disruption to their businesses.
NSCC currently requires a larger
clearing fund deposit from broker-dealer
members which have a minimum excess
net capital of less than $50,000. When
the proposed minimum excess net
capital requirement is increased to
$50,000, the minimum clearing fund
requirements currently imposed will no
longer be applicable because $50,000 in
excess net capital will be required of
these broker-dealers in all instances.
2. Amendment to Standards of
Financial Responsibility Applied to
Banks and Trust Companies Using
Mutual Fund Services and Insurance
Processing Service
Addendum B currently requires that
banks and trust companies that are
applying to be or are Mutual Fund/
Insurance Services Members under Rule
2 have $100,000 minimum excess net
capital over the capital requirement
imposed by the applicable State or
Federal regulatory authority. Addendum
I is silent on the criteria applicable to
banks and trust companies for purposes
of being Fund Members under Rule 51.
Under the proposed rule change, the
standards of financial responsibility
applicable to banks and trust company
applicants applying to use and members
using Mutual Fund Services and
Insurance Processing Services will be
applicable both to Mutual Fund/
Insurance Services Members under Rule
2 and to Fund Members under Rule 51.
Under the proposed standard, a bank
or trust company will be required to
have a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of
at least 6% or greater. A trust company
which is not required to calculate a riskbased capital ratio by its regulators will
be required to have at least $2,000,000
in capital.
As applied to banks, the revised
criteria will apply the standard adopted
by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (‘‘FDIC’’) to compute riskbased capital ratios. The proposed
standard of a minimum Tier 1 riskbased capital ratio of 6% is currently
categorized as ‘‘well-capitalized’’ under
the guidelines issued by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System. All current NSCC Mutual Fund/
Insurance Services Members and Fund
Members that are banks exceed this
requirement.
With respect to trust companies, the
current standard of $100,000 in excess
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
capital over the capital required by
applicable State or Federal regulations
will be replaced by a requirement that
all trust companies have $2,000,000 in
capital. Because State regulations vary
in their respective capital requirements
and because some States do not a have
a capital requirement, the revised
criteria will provide a uniform and
consistent standard to all trust
companies regardless of whether they
are members of the Federal Reserve
System or subject to nonuniform State
regulatory requirements. The proposed
$2,000,000 capital requirement is the
same capital standard required for
membership in The Depository Trust
Company.
Some trust companies which are not
required to calculate a Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio pursuant to FDIC or Federal
Reserve Act requirements calculate this
ratio for other purposes. NSCC will
therefore accept as an alternative to the
minimum $2,000,000 capital
requirement the 6% Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio from those trust companies
which provide this calculation for
regulatory purposes.6
NSCC currently has sixty-six bank/
trust company members to which the
revised capital requirements will apply.
Only one trust company has been
identified as not meeting the new
standard.
III. Discussion
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
requires among other things that the
rules of a clearing agency be designed to
assure the safeguarding of securities and
funds in its custody or control or for
which it is responsible.7 The
Commission finds that NSCC’s proposed
rule change is consistent with this
requirement because by enhancing the
standards of financial responsibility
applicable to NSCC members using
NSCC’s Mutual Fund Services and
Insurance Processing Service, it should
help NSCC protect itself and its
members from undue financial risk. As
a result, the proposal should help NSCC
assure the safeguarding of securities and
funds which are in its custody or
control.
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposed
6 The proposed rule change makes a technical
amendment to Addendum B regarding the capital
standards applicable to bank applicants for full
membership under NSCC Rule 2. In particular, the
proposed rule change amends Section I.B.2.(a)(i) by
replacing the listed components of bank capital
with a reference to bank capital as it is defined in
the Consolidated Report of Condition (‘‘CALL
Report’’).
7 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
E:\FR\FM\17FEN1.SGM
17FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 32 / Thursday, February 17, 2005 / Notices
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and in
particular Section 17A of the Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder.
It Is Therefore Ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,8 that the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
NSCC–2003–22) be and hereby is
approved.
For the Commission by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–655 Filed 2–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–51188; File No. SR–NYSE–
2004–63]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto To
Amend Exchange Rules Relating to the
Return of Membership Certificates,
Notice and Return of Exchange-Issued
Identification Cards, and Minor
Violations of Rules
February 10, 2005.
On November 1, 2004, the New York
Stock Exchange, Inc. (‘‘NYSE’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to:
(1) Delete the requirement in NYSE Rule
343(d) to return certificates of
membership upon termination of
customer offices or status as a member
organization; (2) add NYSE Rule 35.80
to require members and member
organizations to notify the Exchange’s
security office and surrender Exchangeissued identification cards within 24
hours of all employee terminations, reassignments to non-Floor duties, or
cancellations of such identification
cards; (3) rescind NYSE Rule 412(g),
which currently allows the Exchange to
impose fees of up to $100 per securities
account per day for violations of NYSE
Rule 412; and (4) enable violations of
proposed NYSE Rule 35.80 to be
administered through the Exchange’s
minor rule violation plan (NYSE Rule
476A). On December 15, 2004 and
December 23, 2004, the Exchange filed
8 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
9 17
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:41 Feb 16, 2005
Jkt 205001
Amendment Nos. 1 3 and 2 4 to the
proposed rule change, respectively.
The proposed rule change, as
amended, was published for notice and
comment in the Federal Register on
January 7, 2005.5 The Commission
received no comment letters on the
proposal. This order approves the
proposed rule change, as amended.
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities
exchange.6 In particular, the
Commission believes that the proposal
is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,7 because rules that are reasonably
designed to strengthen the Exchange’s
security procedures will protect
investors and the public interest. The
Commission also believes that the
Exchange’s addition to its minor rule
violation plan is consistent with
Sections 6(b)(1) and 6(b)(6) of the Act,8
which require that the rules of an
exchange enforce compliance and
provide appropriate discipline for
violations of Commission and Exchange
rules. In addition, because NYSE Rule
476A provides procedural rights to a
person fined under that rule to contest
the fine and permit a hearing on the
matter, the Commission believes the
proposal provides a fair procedure for
the disciplining of members and
persons associated with members,
consistent with Sections 6(b)(7) and
6(d)(1) of the Act.9
Finally, the Commission finds that the
proposal is consistent with the public
interest, the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes
of the Act, as required by Rule 19d–
1(c)(2) under the Act 10 which governs
minor rule violation plans. The
Commission believes that the change to
the Exchange’s minor rule violation
3 See Form 19b–4 dated December 15, 2004
(‘‘Amendment No. 1’’). In Amendment No. 1, the
Exchange included current rule text that was
omitted from the original rule filing and made
technical changes to the rule text. Amendment No.
1 replaced the original filing in its entirety.
4 See Partial Amendment dated December 23,
2004 (‘‘Amendment No. 2’’). In Amendment No. 2,
the Exchange: (i) submitted the proposed rule text
changes in an Exhibit 4, which was inadvertently
omitted from Amendment No. 1; and (ii) made
minor technical corrections to the existing and
proposed rule text.
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50942
(December 29, 2004), 70 FR 1487.
6 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission notes that it has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1) and 78f(b)(6).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(7) and 78f(d)(1).
10 17 CFR 240.19d–1(c)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8123
plan will strengthen the Exchange’s
ability to carry out its oversight and
enforcement responsibilities as a selfregulatory organization in cases where
full disciplinary proceedings are
unsuitable in view of the minor nature
of the particular violation.
In approving this proposed rule
change, the Commission in no way
minimizes the importance of
compliance with NYSE rules and all
other rules subject to the imposition of
fines under the Exchange’s minor rule
violation plan. The Commission
believes that the violation of any selfregulatory organization’s rules, as well
as Commission rules, is a serious matter.
However, the Exchange’s minor rule
violation plan provides a reasonable
means of addressing rule violations that
do not rise to the level of requiring
formal disciplinary proceedings, while
providing greater flexibility in handling
certain violations. The Commission
expects that the Exchange will continue
to conduct surveillance with due
diligence and make a determination
based on its findings, on case-by-case
basis, whether fines of more or less than
the recommended amount are
appropriate for violations under the
minor rule violation plan or a violation
requires formal disciplinary action.
It Is Therefore Ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 11 and Rule
19d–1(c)(2) under the Act,12 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NYSE–2004–
63), as amended, be, and hereby is,
approved and declared effective.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–653 Filed 2–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–51184; File No. SR–PCX–
2004–129]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice
of Filing and Order Granting
Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Change and Amendment No. 1
Thereto by the Pacific Exchange, Inc.
Relating to Minimum Price
Improvement Standards
February 10, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
11 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 240.19d–1(c)(2).
13 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12) and 200.30–3(a)(44).
12 17
E:\FR\FM\17FEN1.SGM
17FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 32 (Thursday, February 17, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8121-8123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-655]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-51174; File No. SR-NSCC-2003-22]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Securities Clearing
Corporation; Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
the Standards of Financial Responsibility Required of Mutual Fund and
Insurance Services Applicants and Members that Are Banks, Trust
Companies, or Broker-Dealers
February 9, 2005.
I. Introduction
On November 10, 2003, the National Securities Clearing Corporation
(``NSCC'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') and on November 29, 2004, amended proposed rule change
File No. SR-NSCC-2003-22 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'').\1\ Notice of the proposed rule change
was published in the Federal Register on December 13, 2004.\2\ No
comment letters were received. For the reasons discussed below, the
Commission is now granting approval of the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50797 (December 6,
2004), 69 FR 72238.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description
The proposed rule change amends Addendum B, ``Standards of
Financial Responsibility and Operational Capability,'' and Addendum I,
``Standards of Financial Responsibility and Operational Capability For
Fund Members,'' of NSCC's Rules and Procedures to enhance the standards
of financial responsibility required of applicants and members that are
banks, trust companies, and broker-dealers using or applying to use
NSCC's non-guaranteed services as Mutual Fund/Insurance Services
Members under Rule 2 and Fund Members under Rule 51.\3\ Addendum B
establishes financial criteria applicable to Mutual Fund/Insurance
Services Members and
[[Page 8122]]
applicants admitted or seeking admission under Rule 2. Addendum I
establishes the financial criteria applicable to Fund Members and
applicants admitted or seeking admission under Rule 51.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Mutual Fund Services and Insurance Processing Services are
non-guaranteed services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change (i) raises the minimum excess net capital
requirement applicable to such broker-dealer applicants and members
from $25,000 to $50,000 and (ii) changes the standards of financial
responsibility required of banks and trust companies by referring to
different types of criteria than are currently used for this purpose.
The effective date for the proposed rule change as applied to current
members is one year from the date of Commission approval. The one year
period, arrived at after consultations with the affected members, is
necessary to allow members that do not meet the increased or changed
capital requirements sufficient time to evaluate their options and
implement any necessary changes without undue disruption to their
customers. The proposed rule change also amends Addendum I to require
an established business history of six months instead of three years
which is consistent with the required established business history for
applicants for other types of membership in NSCC.
1. Increase of Minimum Excess Net Capital Required of Broker-Dealers
Using Mutual Fund and Insurance Services
NSCC's current minimum excess net capital requirement applicable to
broker-dealer applicants and members using non-guaranteed services was
implemented in 1993.\4\ In 1998, NSCC increased its minimum excess net
capital requirements under Rule 2 for broker-dealer applicants and
members using NSCC guaranteed services from $50,000 to $500,000 subject
to certain limited exceptions.\5\ At that time, no change was made to
the financial requirements applicable to the use of non-guaranteed
services. NSCC now believes it is appropriate to do so because of
increased transaction volumes and settlement obligations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 33525 (January 26,
1994), 59 FR 9805.
\5\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 40081 (June 10, 1998),
63 FR 32905. A municipal securities broker under Rule 15c3-1(a)(8)
of the Act is required to maintain $100,000 in excess net capital,
and a clearing broker is required to maintain $1,000,000 in excess
net capital.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NSCC currently has 290 broker-dealer members to which the increased
excess net capital requirement will apply. Thirteen of the 290 broker-
dealer members have been identified as not meeting the increased
capital requirement. The purpose of delaying effectiveness of the
proposed rule change is to allow these thirteen members time in which
to obtain and apply additional excess net capital or to make alternate
arrangements, such as clearing through another NSCC member, without
disruption to their businesses.
NSCC currently requires a larger clearing fund deposit from broker-
dealer members which have a minimum excess net capital of less than
$50,000. When the proposed minimum excess net capital requirement is
increased to $50,000, the minimum clearing fund requirements currently
imposed will no longer be applicable because $50,000 in excess net
capital will be required of these broker-dealers in all instances.
2. Amendment to Standards of Financial Responsibility Applied to Banks
and Trust Companies Using Mutual Fund Services and Insurance Processing
Service
Addendum B currently requires that banks and trust companies that
are applying to be or are Mutual Fund/Insurance Services Members under
Rule 2 have $100,000 minimum excess net capital over the capital
requirement imposed by the applicable State or Federal regulatory
authority. Addendum I is silent on the criteria applicable to banks and
trust companies for purposes of being Fund Members under Rule 51.
Under the proposed rule change, the standards of financial
responsibility applicable to banks and trust company applicants
applying to use and members using Mutual Fund Services and Insurance
Processing Services will be applicable both to Mutual Fund/Insurance
Services Members under Rule 2 and to Fund Members under Rule 51.
Under the proposed standard, a bank or trust company will be
required to have a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6% or
greater. A trust company which is not required to calculate a risk-
based capital ratio by its regulators will be required to have at least
$2,000,000 in capital.
As applied to banks, the revised criteria will apply the standard
adopted by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (``FDIC'') to
compute risk-based capital ratios. The proposed standard of a minimum
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6% is currently categorized as
``well-capitalized'' under the guidelines issued by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System. All current NSCC Mutual Fund/
Insurance Services Members and Fund Members that are banks exceed this
requirement.
With respect to trust companies, the current standard of $100,000
in excess capital over the capital required by applicable State or
Federal regulations will be replaced by a requirement that all trust
companies have $2,000,000 in capital. Because State regulations vary in
their respective capital requirements and because some States do not a
have a capital requirement, the revised criteria will provide a uniform
and consistent standard to all trust companies regardless of whether
they are members of the Federal Reserve System or subject to nonuniform
State regulatory requirements. The proposed $2,000,000 capital
requirement is the same capital standard required for membership in The
Depository Trust Company.
Some trust companies which are not required to calculate a Tier 1
risk-based capital ratio pursuant to FDIC or Federal Reserve Act
requirements calculate this ratio for other purposes. NSCC will
therefore accept as an alternative to the minimum $2,000,000 capital
requirement the 6% Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio from those trust
companies which provide this calculation for regulatory purposes.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The proposed rule change makes a technical amendment to
Addendum B regarding the capital standards applicable to bank
applicants for full membership under NSCC Rule 2. In particular, the
proposed rule change amends Section I.B.2.(a)(i) by replacing the
listed components of bank capital with a reference to bank capital
as it is defined in the Consolidated Report of Condition (``CALL
Report'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NSCC currently has sixty-six bank/trust company members to which
the revised capital requirements will apply. Only one trust company has
been identified as not meeting the new standard.
III. Discussion
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires among other things that
the rules of a clearing agency be designed to assure the safeguarding
of securities and funds in its custody or control or for which it is
responsible.\7\ The Commission finds that NSCC's proposed rule change
is consistent with this requirement because by enhancing the standards
of financial responsibility applicable to NSCC members using NSCC's
Mutual Fund Services and Insurance Processing Service, it should help
NSCC protect itself and its members from undue financial risk. As a
result, the proposal should help NSCC assure the safeguarding of
securities and funds which are in its custody or control.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposed
[[Page 8123]]
rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in
particular Section 17A of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder.
It Is Therefore Ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\8\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-NSCC-2003-22) be and
hereby is approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-655 Filed 2-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P