Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Two Crossing Sessions in the Exchange's Off-Hours Trading Facility, 6484-6486 [E5-469]
Download as PDF
6484
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 24 / Monday, February 7, 2005 / Notices
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
20549–0609.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2005–08. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Section, 450 Fifth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such
filing also will be available on NYSE’s
website (https://www.nyse.com/
regulation/construles/
1098741855384.html) and for inspection
and copying at the principal office of
NYSE. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2005–08 and should
be submitted on or before February 28,
2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.22
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–465 Filed 2–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–51091; File No. SR–NYSE–
2005–01]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Two Crossing Sessions in the
Exchange’s Off-Hours Trading Facility
January 28, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January 4,
2005, the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder,
which renders it effective upon filing
with the Commission.4 The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change makes
operative the following pilot programs
until February 1, 2006: Crossing Session
III, for the execution of guaranteed price
coupled orders by member
organizations to fill the balance of
customer orders at a price that was
guaranteed to a customer prior to the
close of the Exchange’s 9:30 a.m. to 4
p.m. trading session (‘‘Crossing Session
III’’); and Crossing Session IV, whereby
an unfilled balance of an order may be
filled at a price such that the entire
order is filled at no worse price than the
Volume Weighted Average Price
(‘‘VWAP’’) for the subject security
(‘‘Crossing Session IV’’) (Crossing
Session III and Crossing Session IV, the
‘‘Pilots’’).5
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
5 On November 12, 2004, the Exchange made an
electronic 19b–4 filing to extend the Pilots as of
December 1, 2004, the date the Pilots were due to
expire. The Commission did not receive this filing,
however. With the instant proposed rule change,
the Exchange is making the Pilots operative until
February 1, 2006.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
NYSE included statements concerning
the purpose of, and basis, for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of the proposed
rule change is available on the NYSE’s
Web site (https://www.nyse.com), at the
NYSE’s Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
In SR–NYSE–2002–40,6 the
Commission approved the
establishment of the Pilots in the
Exchange’s Off-Hours Trading Facility
(‘‘OHTF’’), expiring on December 1,
2004. The instant proposed rule change
makes the Pilots operative until
February 1, 2006. No changes have been
made to the manner in which the Pilots
operate.7
Background
The purpose of SR–NYSE–2002–40
was to add two pilot programs, Crossing
Session III and Crossing Session IV, to
the OHTF. Before the proposed rule
change, the OHTF consisted of Crossing
Sessions I and II. Crossing Session I
permits the execution, at the Exchange’s
closing price, of single-stock, singlesided closing price orders and crosses of
single-stock, closing price buy and sell
orders. Crossing Session II permits the
execution of crosses of multiple-stock
(‘‘basket’’) aggregate price buy and sell
orders. For Crossing Session II, trade
reporting is accomplished by reporting
to the Consolidated Tape the total
number of shares and the total market
value of the aggregate-price trades.
There is no indication of the individual
component stocks involved in the
aggregate-price transactions.
2 17
22 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate jul<14>2003
21:04 Feb 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6 See Securities Exchange act Release No. 48857
(December 1, 2003), 68 FR 68440 (December 8,
2003) (SR–NYSE–2002–40).
7 See January 7, 2005 telephone conference
among Donald Siemer, Director, Market
Surveillance, NYSE, Joseph P. Morra, Special
Counsel, Division of Market Regulation
(‘‘Division’’), Commission and Mitra Mehr,
Attorney, Division, Commission.
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 24 / Monday, February 7, 2005 / Notices
Crossing Session III
As described below, the Exchange is
proposing to make operative until
February 1, 2006, the pilot program,
Crossing Session III, as described in
Exchange Rule 907. This Pilot would
continue to allow for the execution on
the NYSE of ‘‘guaranteed price coupled
orders’’ whereby member organizations
could fill the unfilled balance of a
customer order at a price which was
guaranteed to the customer prior to the
close of the Exchange’s 9:30 a.m. to 4
p.m. trading session.
The Granting of ‘‘Upstairs Stops’’
In serving their institutional
customers, member firms may offer
them a guarantee that a large size order
will receive no worse than a particular
price. Such a practice is usually referred
to as an ‘‘upstairs stop,’’ meaning that
the firm guarantees that its customer’s
order will be executed at no worse price
than the agreed-upon, guaranteed price,
with the member firm trading for its
own account, if necessary, to effectuate
the guarantee.
Typically, a member firm will seek to
execute as much of the order as possible
during the trading day at or below the
‘‘stop’’ price (in the case of a buy order)
or at or above the ‘‘stop’’ price (in the
case of a sell order). Any portion of the
order not filled during the trading day
will be completed after hours, with the
firm either buying from, or selling to, its
customer at a price which ensures that
the entire order is executed at a price
which is no worse than the ‘‘stop’’ price.
Member firms typically execute the
unfilled balance of the order, after the
U.S. Consolidated Tape is closed, in the
London over-the-counter market, where
trades are not reported in real time. The
purpose of this is simply to minimize
the possibility that other market
participants may ascertain the firm’s, or
the customer’s inventory position, and
possibly trade in the subject security to
the detriment of the firm that granted
the upstairs stop.
Crossing Session IV
The Exchange is also proposing to
make operative until February 1, 2006
the pilot program for Crossing Session
IV as described in Exchange Rule 907.
Crossing Session IV is a facility whereby
member organizations may fill the
unfilled balance of a customer’s order at
a price such that the overall order is
filled at a price that is no worse than the
VWAP for the subject security on that
trading day. The member organization
would be required to document its
VWAP agreement with the customer
and the basis upon which the VWAP
price would be determined.
VerDate jul<14>2003
21:04 Feb 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
Operation of Crossing Sessions
Crossing Session III and Crossing
Session IV would continue to operate as
follows:
(i) The original order as to which an
‘‘upstairs stop’’ or ‘‘VWAP’’ has been
granted must be for at least 10,000
shares;
(ii) The customer must have received
a ‘‘stop’’ (guaranteed price) or VWAP for
the entire order;
(iii) The member firm must record all
details of the order, including the price
it has guaranteed its customer or that
the entire order will be filled at no
worse than the VWAP;
(iv) The unfilled balance of the order
that would be executed in Crossing
Session III or Crossing Session IV must
be at least 10,000 shares;
(v) The customer’s order must be
executed in Crossing Session III or
Crossing Session IV at a price that
ensures that the entire order is executed
at a price that is no worse than the
guaranteed price or the VWAP;
(vi) Orders may be entered in Crossing
Session III or Crossing Session IV
between 4 p.m. and 6:30 p.m., and must
be identified as either a Crossing
Session III or Crossing Session IV order;
(vii) Member firms would receive an
immediate report of execution upon
entering an order into Crossing Session
III or Crossing Session IV;
(viii) Orders may be entered into
Crossing Session III for execution at
prices outside the trading range in the
subject security during the 9:30 a.m. to
4 p.m. trading session;
(ix) Orders may not be entered into
Crossing Session III or Crossing Session
IV in a security that is subject to a
trading halt at the close of the regular
9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. trading session; and
(x) At 6:30 p.m., the Exchange would
print trades reported through Crossing
Session III as guaranteed price coupled
orders or in Crossing Session IV as
VWAP executions.
6485
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received from
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 10 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.11 At any time within 60
days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears
to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
NYSE has asked the Commission to
waive the five-day pre-filing notice
requirement and the 30-day operative
delay. The Commission believes such
waiver is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest
because it would allow the Pilots to be
operative without unnecessary delay.12
For this reason, the Commission
designates the proposal to be operative
upon filing with the Commission.
2. Statutory Basis
NYSE believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with Section 6 of
the Act 8 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 9
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanisms of a free and
open market and the national market
system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
PO 00000
8 15
9 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
12 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day preoperative period, the Commission has considered
the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency,
competition and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
11 17
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
6486
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 24 / Monday, February 7, 2005 / Notices
• Send e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NYSE–2005–01 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
20549–0609.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2005–01. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro/shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing will also be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the NYSE. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2005–01 and should
be submitted on or before February 28,
2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–469 Filed 2–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–51120; File No. SR–OCC–
2004–19]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Options Clearing Corporation; Notice
of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Clearing Member Trade
Assignment Processing
February 1, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934,1 notice
is hereby given that on November 1,
2004, The Options Clearing Corporation
(‘‘OCC’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared primarily by OCC.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change would
amend OCC’s By-laws and Rules by
adding new clearing member trade
assignment (‘‘CMTA’’) processing
requirements.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
OCC included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. OCC has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.2
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
Since OCC amended its CMTA rules
in 2004,3 a group of clearing members,
the options exchanges, and OCC has
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Commission has modified the text of the
summaries prepared by OCC.
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49841
(June 9, 2004); 69 FR 34207 (June 18, 2004) [File
No. SR–OCC–2003–11]. CMTA processing enables
one clearing member (‘‘carrying clearing member’’)
to authorize another clearing member (‘‘executing
clearing member’’) to direct that exchange
transactions be transferred to an account of the
carrying clearing member for clearance and
settlement.
been collaborating to better define the
rights and obligations of the clearing
members that are parties to a CMTA
arrangement in order to increase the
regulatory and legal certainties with
respect thereto. One focus of this
working group has been to formulate
new CMTA processing rules that would
be applied to transactions that have
been executed for institutional and
other customers (‘‘CMTA customers’’)
with prime brokerage arrangements with
the carrying clearing member that serves
as a CMTA customer’s prime broker.
Under the proposed rule change, OCC
would modify Article I (‘‘Definitions’’)
of its By-Laws and Rules 401 and 403
to require clearing members that are
parties to a CMTA arrangement
involving CMTA customers to register
with OCC certain customer identifiers
that the clearing members use to process
the CMTA transactions. Specifically, the
new rules would provide that an
exchange transaction executed on behalf
of a CMTA customer that is to be
transferred by CMTA processing for
clearance and settlement will be
identified by a special indicator called
a Customer CMTA Indicator in the
matching trade information submitted
with respect to that transaction.4 For
each transaction marked with the
Customer CMTA Indicator, the
matching trade information would also
contain identification information about
the CMTA customer on whose behalf a
transaction was executed (‘‘CMTA
Customer Identifier’’) and the
introducing broker that executed or
arranged for the execution of such
transaction (‘‘IB Identifier’’).5
If a transaction is marked with the
CMTA Indicator, OCC’s systems would
verify against a database of registered
identifiers that the CMTA Customer
Identifier and the IB Identifier supplied
as a part of the trade information match
registered identifiers for purposes of the
CMTA arrangement between the
carrying and executing clearing
members to the trade. This verification
step would be in addition to the other
verifications performed by OCC’s
systems for CMTA processing. If a
transaction is marked with a Customer
CMTA Indicator but either the CMTA
Customer Identifier or the IB Identifier
is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing,
1 15
2 The
13 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate jul<14>2003
21:04 Feb 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4 The same indicator would be used by all options
exchanges. OCC made various system changes to
process this indicator and other information to be
supplied with respect to CMTA customers’
transactions. Matching trade information submitted
by the options exchanges would need to include
this information that requires changes to the
exchanges’ systems.
5 If the introducing broker is also the executing
clearing member, a separate IB Identifier would still
be required.
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 24 (Monday, February 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6484-6486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-469]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-51091; File No. SR-NYSE-2005-01]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Two Crossing Sessions in the Exchange's Off-Hours Trading
Facility
January 28, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 4, 2005, the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder, which renders it effective
upon filing with the Commission.\4\ The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change makes operative the following pilot
programs until February 1, 2006: Crossing Session III, for the
execution of guaranteed price coupled orders by member organizations to
fill the balance of customer orders at a price that was guaranteed to a
customer prior to the close of the Exchange's 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.
trading session (``Crossing Session III''); and Crossing Session IV,
whereby an unfilled balance of an order may be filled at a price such
that the entire order is filled at no worse price than the Volume
Weighted Average Price (``VWAP'') for the subject security (``Crossing
Session IV'') (Crossing Session III and Crossing Session IV, the
``Pilots'').\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ On November 12, 2004, the Exchange made an electronic 19b-4
filing to extend the Pilots as of December 1, 2004, the date the
Pilots were due to expire. The Commission did not receive this
filing, however. With the instant proposed rule change, the Exchange
is making the Pilots operative until February 1, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, NYSE included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis, for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of the proposed rule change is available on the NYSE's Web site
(https://www.nyse.com), at the NYSE's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
In SR-NYSE-2002-40,\6\ the Commission approved the establishment of
the Pilots in the Exchange's Off-Hours Trading Facility (``OHTF''),
expiring on December 1, 2004. The instant proposed rule change makes
the Pilots operative until February 1, 2006. No changes have been made
to the manner in which the Pilots operate.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Securities Exchange act Release No. 48857 (December 1,
2003), 68 FR 68440 (December 8, 2003) (SR-NYSE-2002-40).
\7\ See January 7, 2005 telephone conference among Donald
Siemer, Director, Market Surveillance, NYSE, Joseph P. Morra,
Special Counsel, Division of Market Regulation (``Division''),
Commission and Mitra Mehr, Attorney, Division, Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The purpose of SR-NYSE-2002-40 was to add two pilot programs,
Crossing Session III and Crossing Session IV, to the OHTF. Before the
proposed rule change, the OHTF consisted of Crossing Sessions I and II.
Crossing Session I permits the execution, at the Exchange's closing
price, of single-stock, single-sided closing price orders and crosses
of single-stock, closing price buy and sell orders. Crossing Session II
permits the execution of crosses of multiple-stock (``basket'')
aggregate price buy and sell orders. For Crossing Session II, trade
reporting is accomplished by reporting to the Consolidated Tape the
total number of shares and the total market value of the aggregate-
price trades. There is no indication of the individual component stocks
involved in the aggregate-price transactions.
[[Page 6485]]
Crossing Session III
As described below, the Exchange is proposing to make operative
until February 1, 2006, the pilot program, Crossing Session III, as
described in Exchange Rule 907. This Pilot would continue to allow for
the execution on the NYSE of ``guaranteed price coupled orders''
whereby member organizations could fill the unfilled balance of a
customer order at a price which was guaranteed to the customer prior to
the close of the Exchange's 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. trading session.
The Granting of ``Upstairs Stops''
In serving their institutional customers, member firms may offer
them a guarantee that a large size order will receive no worse than a
particular price. Such a practice is usually referred to as an
``upstairs stop,'' meaning that the firm guarantees that its customer's
order will be executed at no worse price than the agreed-upon,
guaranteed price, with the member firm trading for its own account, if
necessary, to effectuate the guarantee.
Typically, a member firm will seek to execute as much of the order
as possible during the trading day at or below the ``stop'' price (in
the case of a buy order) or at or above the ``stop'' price (in the case
of a sell order). Any portion of the order not filled during the
trading day will be completed after hours, with the firm either buying
from, or selling to, its customer at a price which ensures that the
entire order is executed at a price which is no worse than the ``stop''
price.
Member firms typically execute the unfilled balance of the order,
after the U.S. Consolidated Tape is closed, in the London over-the-
counter market, where trades are not reported in real time. The purpose
of this is simply to minimize the possibility that other market
participants may ascertain the firm's, or the customer's inventory
position, and possibly trade in the subject security to the detriment
of the firm that granted the upstairs stop.
Crossing Session IV
The Exchange is also proposing to make operative until February 1,
2006 the pilot program for Crossing Session IV as described in Exchange
Rule 907. Crossing Session IV is a facility whereby member
organizations may fill the unfilled balance of a customer's order at a
price such that the overall order is filled at a price that is no worse
than the VWAP for the subject security on that trading day. The member
organization would be required to document its VWAP agreement with the
customer and the basis upon which the VWAP price would be determined.
Operation of Crossing Sessions
Crossing Session III and Crossing Session IV would continue to
operate as follows:
(i) The original order as to which an ``upstairs stop'' or ``VWAP''
has been granted must be for at least 10,000 shares;
(ii) The customer must have received a ``stop'' (guaranteed price)
or VWAP for the entire order;
(iii) The member firm must record all details of the order,
including the price it has guaranteed its customer or that the entire
order will be filled at no worse than the VWAP;
(iv) The unfilled balance of the order that would be executed in
Crossing Session III or Crossing Session IV must be at least 10,000
shares;
(v) The customer's order must be executed in Crossing Session III
or Crossing Session IV at a price that ensures that the entire order is
executed at a price that is no worse than the guaranteed price or the
VWAP;
(vi) Orders may be entered in Crossing Session III or Crossing
Session IV between 4 p.m. and 6:30 p.m., and must be identified as
either a Crossing Session III or Crossing Session IV order;
(vii) Member firms would receive an immediate report of execution
upon entering an order into Crossing Session III or Crossing Session
IV;
(viii) Orders may be entered into Crossing Session III for
execution at prices outside the trading range in the subject security
during the 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. trading session;
(ix) Orders may not be entered into Crossing Session III or
Crossing Session IV in a security that is subject to a trading halt at
the close of the regular 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. trading session; and
(x) At 6:30 p.m., the Exchange would print trades reported through
Crossing Session III as guaranteed price coupled orders or in Crossing
Session IV as VWAP executions.
2. Statutory Basis
NYSE believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6 of the Act \8\ in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \9\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and the
national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) \10\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\11\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NYSE has asked the Commission to waive the five-day pre-filing
notice requirement and the 30-day operative delay. The Commission
believes such waiver is consistent with the protection of investors and
the public interest because it would allow the Pilots to be operative
without unnecessary delay.\12\ For this reason, the Commission
designates the proposal to be operative upon filing with the
Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day pre-operative
period, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
[[Page 6486]]
Send e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR-NYSE-2005-01 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20549-0609.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2005-01. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro/shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the NYSE. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSE-2005-01 and should be submitted on or before
February 28, 2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-469 Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P