Royal Home Fashions Plant No. 6, Henderson, NC; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration, 6458 [E5-461]
Download as PDF
6458
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 24 / Monday, February 7, 2005 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of
January, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–462 Filed 2–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–55,691]
Royal Home Fashions Plant No. 6,
Henderson, NC; Notice of Revised
Determination on Reconsideration
By application of November 22, 2004,
a petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department’s
negative determination regarding
eligibility for workers and former
workers of the subject firm to apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA). The denial notice
was signed on October 25, 2004 and
published in the Federal Register on
November 12, 2004 (69 FR 65462).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or
of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The TAA petition, filed on behalf of
workers at Royal Home Fashions, Plant
No. 6, Henderson, North Carolina
engaged in production of bedding
(sheets, pillow cases, comforters, shams,
etc.) was denied because it was
determined that the declines in
employment at the subject firm were
predominantly caused by unrelated to
imports circumstances.
The petitioner alleges that the
petitioning group of workers was in
direct support of the Royal Home
Fashions manufacturing facilities
known as Plant No. 4 and Plant No. 2
in Henderson, North Carolina. The
workers of these facilities were certified
eligible for TAA on July 15, 2004 and
August 24, 2004 respectively.
A company official was contacted to
verify whether workers at the subject
facility were performing services for
Plant No. 4 and Plant No. 2 during the
VerDate jul<14>2003
21:04 Feb 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
relevant period. The company official
stated that the subject facility serves as
a distribution and warehousing facility
and is in direct support of production
for Plants No. 2 and No. 4 in Henderson,
North Carolina.
In accordance with Section 246 the
Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as
amended, the Department of Labor
herein presents the results of its
investigation regarding certification of
eligibility to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance (ATAA) for older
workers of Royal Home Fashions, Plant
No. 6, Henderson, North Carolina.
The group eligibility criteria for the
ATAA program that the Department
must consider under Section 246 of the
Trade Act are:
1. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
The Department has determined that
criterion 2 has not been met. The
investigation revealed that the work
performed by the petitioning group are
easily transferable to other positions in
the commuting area.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts
obtained in the investigation, I
determine that increases of imports of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by Royal Home
Fashions, Henderson, North Carolina
contributed importantly to the total or
partial separation of workers and to the
decline in sales or production at that
firm or subdivision. In accordance with
the provisions of the Act, I make the
following certification:
All workers of the Royal Home Fashions,
Plant 6, Henderson, North Carolina who
became totally or partially separated from
employment on or after September 24, 2003
through two years from the date of this
certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of
the Trade Act of 1974, and are denied
eligibility to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of
January, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–461 Filed 2–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19
U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
periods of January 2005.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for
directly-impacted (primary) worker
adjustment assistance to be issued, each
of the group eligibility requirements of
Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production
by such workers’ firm or subdivision to
a foreign county of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which
are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 24 (Monday, February 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 6458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-461]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-55,691]
Royal Home Fashions Plant No. 6, Henderson, NC; Notice of Revised
Determination on Reconsideration
By application of November 22, 2004, a petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of
the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA). The denial notice was
signed on October 25, 2004 and published in the Federal Register on
November 12, 2004 (69 FR 65462).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-
interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The TAA petition, filed on behalf of workers at Royal Home
Fashions, Plant No. 6, Henderson, North Carolina engaged in production
of bedding (sheets, pillow cases, comforters, shams, etc.) was denied
because it was determined that the declines in employment at the
subject firm were predominantly caused by unrelated to imports
circumstances.
The petitioner alleges that the petitioning group of workers was in
direct support of the Royal Home Fashions manufacturing facilities
known as Plant No. 4 and Plant No. 2 in Henderson, North Carolina. The
workers of these facilities were certified eligible for TAA on July 15,
2004 and August 24, 2004 respectively.
A company official was contacted to verify whether workers at the
subject facility were performing services for Plant No. 4 and Plant No.
2 during the relevant period. The company official stated that the
subject facility serves as a distribution and warehousing facility and
is in direct support of production for Plants No. 2 and No. 4 in
Henderson, North Carolina.
In accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C.
2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein presents the results
of its investigation regarding certification of eligibility to apply
for alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) for older workers of
Royal Home Fashions, Plant No. 6, Henderson, North Carolina.
The group eligibility criteria for the ATAA program that the
Department must consider under Section 246 of the Trade Act are:
1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are
not easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
The Department has determined that criterion 2 has not been met.
The investigation revealed that the work performed by the petitioning
group are easily transferable to other positions in the commuting area.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the investigation, I
determine that increases of imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles produced by Royal Home Fashions, Henderson,
North Carolina contributed importantly to the total or partial
separation of workers and to the decline in sales or production at that
firm or subdivision. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I
make the following certification:
All workers of the Royal Home Fashions, Plant 6, Henderson,
North Carolina who became totally or partially separated from
employment on or after September 24, 2003 through two years from the
date of this certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are
denied eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of January, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-461 Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P