Submission for OMB Emergency Review; Comment Request, 6455 [05-2441]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 24 / Monday, February 7, 2005 / Notices
(a) ‘‘Horizontal peripheral third
surface’’ (claims 1, 13);
(b) ‘‘vertical outer peripheral surface’’
(claims 1, 13); and
(c) ‘‘horizontal third surface’’ (claim
1)?
4. How should the following claim
limitations be construed:
(a) ‘‘The second surface of the die pad
is exposed in the plane of the first
exterior surface of the package body’’
(‘277 patent, claim 18); and
(b) ‘‘the second surface of each lead is
exposed in a horizontal plane of a first
exterior surface of the package’’ (‘356
patent, claims 1, 13)?
In particular, please address how
plating affects whether ‘‘the second
surface of the die pad’’ in claim 18 of
the ‘277 patent and ‘‘the second surface
of each lead’’ in claims 1 and 13 of the
‘356 patent are ‘‘exposed.’’
5. Do the preambles of claims 1 and
3 of the ‘728 patent constitute claim
limitations? In particular, please address
how the intrinsic evidence supports
your position in light of the teachings of
the Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit.
Written Submissions: Submissions
should be concise and thoroughly
referenced to the record in this
investigation. The written submissions
must be filed no later than close of
business on February 14, 2005. Reply
submissions must be filed no later than
the close of business on February 22,
2005. No further submissions will be
permitted unless otherwise ordered by
the Commission.
Persons filing written submissions
must file with the Office of the Secretary
the original document and 14 true
copies thereof on or before the deadlines
stated above. Any person desiring to
submit a document (or portion thereof)
to the Commission in confidence must
request confidential treatment unless
the information has already been
granted such treatment during the
proceedings. All such requests should
be directed to the Secretary of the
Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such
treatment. See section 201.6 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR § 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is sought will be treated
accordingly. All nonconfidential written
submissions will be available for public
inspection at the Office of the Secretary.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
sections 210.42–210.45 and 210.51 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
VerDate jul<14>2003
21:57 Feb 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
Procedure (19 CFR §§ 210.42–210.45
and 210.51).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 1, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–2261 Filed 2–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Submission for OMB Emergency
Review; Comment Request
February 1, 2005.
The Department of Labor has
submitted the following information
collection request (ICR), utilizing
emergency review procedures, to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–
13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). OMB
approval has been requested by March
9, 2005. A copy of this ICR, with
applicable supporting documentation,
may be obtained by calling the
Department of Labor’s Departmental
Clearance Officer, Ira L. Mills at (202)
693–4122 (this is not a toll-free
number); via e-mail at: millsira@dol.gov; or (202) 693–7755 (TTY).
The State Planning Guidance may also
be found at the Web site—https://
www.doleta.gov/usworkforce.
Comments and questions about the
ICR listed below should be forwarded to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the
Employment and Training
Administration, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503.
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6455
(e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.)
Agency: Employment and Training
Administration.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Title: Planning Guidance and
Instructions for Submission of the
Strategic Five Year State Plan for Title
I of the Workforce Investment Act of
1998 (WIA) and the Wagner Peyser Act.
OMB Number: 1205–0398.
Frequency: Every five years.
Type of Response: Reporting.
Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal
Government.
Total Respondents: 59.
Number of Responses: 59.
Total Burden: 1,475.
Total Annualized Capital/Startup
Cost): $ 0.
Total Annual Costs (Operating/
Maintaining Systems or Purchasing
Services): $ 0.
Description: All current WIA State
Plans will expire June 30, 2005. It is
unlikely that Congress will pass a
reauthorized Workforce Investment Act
(WIA) before that time. Therefore, the
enclosed Proposed WIA Planning
Guidance is designed to advise States
about how to continue their WIA Title
I and Wagner Peyser Act programs
under Public Law 105–220.
Ira L. Mills,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–2441 Filed 2–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–55,518]
BASF Corporation, Freeport, TX;
Notice of Revised Determination on
Reconsideration
On January 12, 2005, the Department
of Labor issued a Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration applicable to the
subject firm. The Notice will soon be
published in the Federal Register.
The initial investigation found that
workers are separately identifiable by
product line (polycaprolactum, oxo,
diols, and acrylic monomers), that
polycaprolactum, oxo and diol
production increased during the
relevant period, and that the subject
company neither increased imports of
acrylic monomers during the relevant
period nor shifted acrylic monomer
production abroad.
The petitioner asserted in the request
for reconsideration that the worker
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 24 (Monday, February 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 6455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2441]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Submission for OMB Emergency Review; Comment Request
February 1, 2005.
The Department of Labor has submitted the following information
collection request (ICR), utilizing emergency review procedures, to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-13,
44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). OMB approval has been requested by March 9,
2005. A copy of this ICR, with applicable supporting documentation, may
be obtained by calling the Department of Labor's Departmental Clearance
Officer, Ira L. Mills at (202) 693-4122 (this is not a toll-free
number); via e-mail at: mills-ira@dol.gov; or (202) 693-7755 (TTY). The
State Planning Guidance may also be found at the Web site--https://
www.doleta.gov/usworkforce.
Comments and questions about the ICR listed below should be
forwarded to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn:
OMB Desk Officer for the Employment and Training Administration, Room
10235, Washington, DC 20503.
The OMB is particularly interested in comments which:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology (e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses.)
Agency: Employment and Training Administration.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Title: Planning Guidance and Instructions for Submission of the
Strategic Five Year State Plan for Title I of the Workforce Investment
Act of 1998 (WIA) and the Wagner Peyser Act.
OMB Number: 1205-0398.
Frequency: Every five years.
Type of Response: Reporting.
Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal Government.
Total Respondents: 59.
Number of Responses: 59.
Total Burden: 1,475.
Total Annualized Capital/Startup Cost): $ 0.
Total Annual Costs (Operating/Maintaining Systems or Purchasing
Services): $ 0.
Description: All current WIA State Plans will expire June 30, 2005.
It is unlikely that Congress will pass a reauthorized Workforce
Investment Act (WIA) before that time. Therefore, the enclosed Proposed
WIA Planning Guidance is designed to advise States about how to
continue their WIA Title I and Wagner Peyser Act programs under Public
Law 105-220.
Ira L. Mills,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-2441 Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
