Annual Funding Notice for Multiemployer Defined Benefit Pension Plans, 6306-6312 [05-2151]
Download as PDF
6306
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 23 / Friday, February 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Regulations and Interpretations,
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, (202) 693–8500. This is
not a toll-free number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
29 CFR Part 2520
RIN 1210–AB00
Annual Funding Notice for
Multiemployer Defined Benefit Pension
Plans
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, DOL.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains a
proposed regulation that, upon
adoption, would implement the notice
requirement in section 101(f) of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974. Section 103 of the Pension
Funding Equity Act of 2004 (PFEA ’04)
amended section 101 of ERISA by
adding a new subsection (f), which
requires the administrator of a
multiemployer defined benefit plan to
provide participants, beneficiaries, and
certain other parties, including the
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation,
with an annual funding notice
indicating, among other things, whether
the plan’s funded current liability
percentage is at least 100 percent. This
document also contains a model notice
that may be used by plan administrators
in discharging their duties under section
101(f). This proposed regulation, upon
adoption, will affect plan
administrators, participants, and
beneficiaries of multiemployer defined
benefit pension plans, as well as labor
organizations representing such
participants or beneficiaries and
employers that have an obligation to
contribute under such plans.
DATES: Written comments on the
proposed regulation should be received
by the Department of Labor on or before
March 7, 2005. See ‘‘C. Request for
Comments,’’ in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
addressed to the Office of Regulations
and Interpretations, Employee Benefits
Security Administration, Room N–5669,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20210, Attn: PFEA ’04 Project.
Comments also may be submitted
electronically to e-ORI@dol.gov. All
comments received will be available for
public inspection at the Public
Disclosure Room, N–1513, Employee
Benefits Security Administration, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20210.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephanie L. Ward, Office of
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:30 Feb 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
A. Background
Section 103(a) of the Pension Funding
Equity Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108–218
(PFEA ’04), which was enacted on April
10, 2004, added section 101(f) to the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA or the
Act). Section 101(f) provides that the
administrator of a defined benefit plan
which is a multiemployer plan shall for
each plan year furnish a plan funding
notice to each plan participant and
beneficiary, to each labor organization
representing such participants or
beneficiaries, to each employer that has
an obligation to contribute under the
plan, and to the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation. Section 103(b) of
PFEA ’04 amended section 502(c)(1) of
ERISA to provide that any administrator
who fails to meet the requirements of
section 101(f) with respect to a
participant or beneficiary may, in a
court’s discretion, be personally liable
to such participant or beneficiary in the
amount of up to $100 a day from the
date of such failure or refusal and the
court may in its discretion order such
other relief as it deems proper. Section
103(c) of PFEA ’04 provides that the
Secretary of Labor shall, not later than
1 year after the date of the enactment of
PFEA ’04, issue regulations (including a
model notice) necessary to implement
the amendments made by section 103.
Section 103(d) of PFEA ’04 provides
that the amendments made by section
103 of PFEA ’04 shall apply to plan
years beginning after December 31,
2004.
B. Overview of Proposed Regulation
Paragraph (a) of the proposed
regulation implements the requirements
set forth in section 101(f)(1) of the Act.
This section in general requires the
administrator of a multiemployer
defined benefit pension plan to furnish
annually a notice of the plan’s funded
status to the plan’s participants and
beneficiaries and other specified
interested parties (each labor
organization representing such
participants or beneficiaries, each
employer that has an obligation to
contribute under the plan, and the
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
(PBGC)). Those persons entitled to the
notice are further clarified in paragraph
(f) of the proposed regulation.
Paragraph (a)(2) provides a limited
exception to the requirement to furnish
the annual funding notice. Under the
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
exception, the plan administrator of a
plan receiving financial assistance from
the PBGC is not required to furnish the
annual funding notice to the parties
otherwise entitled to such notice. The
Department, after consulting with the
PBGC, is of the view that such notice
would be of little, if any, value to such
parties in light of the PBGC’s authority
and responsibility under title IV of
ERISA with respect to insolvent
multiemployer plans.1
Paragraph (b) of the proposed
regulation sets forth the content
requirements of the notice required
under section 101(f). Paragraph (b)
requires that the identification and
financial information included in the
notice is consistent with the information
included in the plan’s Annual Return/
Report filed for the plan year to which
the notice relates.
Specifically, paragraph (b)(1)–(4)
provides that the notice shall include:
The name of the plan; the address and
phone number of the plan administrator
and the plan’s principal administrative
officer (if different from the plan
administrator); the plan sponsor’s
employer identification number
(currently line 2(b) of the Annual
Return/Report Form 5500); and the plan
number (currently line 1(b) of the
Annual Return/Report Form 5500).
Paragraph (b)(5)–(8) further provides
that the notice shall include information
relevant to the plan’s funding,
including: a statement as to whether the
plan’s funded current liability
percentage (calculated by dividing the
actuarial value of the plan’s assets
(currently line 1b(2) of the Schedule B
of the Annual Return/Report Form
5500) by the current liability (currently
line 2b(4), column (3), of the Schedule
B of the Annual Return/Report Form
5500) for the plan year to which the
notice relates is at least 100 percent
(and, if not, the actual percentage); a
statement of the market value of the
plan’s assets (currently line 1b(1) of the
Schedule B of the Annual Return/Report
Form 5500) and the valuation date, the
1 The provisions of title IV of ERISA that apply
in the context of a plan’s receipt of financial
assistance from the PBGC (sections 4245(e) and
4281(d)) ensure that participants and beneficiaries
of insolvent plans are adequately informed of,
among other things, their plan’s funding status
(including for participants in pay status, their
individual benefit levels), and PBGC’s benefit
guarantees. In addition, PBGC receives plan
financial information before providing financial
assistance. Inasmuch as the foregoing title IV
provisions are largely duplicative of the
requirements in section 101(f) of ERISA, an
exception from the requirements of section 101(f)
for plans receiving financial assistance necessarily
would reduce administrative costs to these plans,
thereby increasing the plan’s available resources for
benefit payments.
E:\FR\FM\04FEP6.SGM
04FEP6
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 23 / Friday, February 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules
amount of benefit payments for the plan
year to which the notice relates
(currently line 2e(4) of the Schedule H
of the Annual Return/Report Form
5500), and the ratio of the assets to the
benefit payments for the plan year to
which the notice relates; a summary of
the rules governing insolvent
multiemployer plans, including the
limitations on benefit payments and any
potential benefit reductions and
suspensions (and the potential effects of
such limitations, reductions, and
suspensions on the plan); and a general
description of the benefits under the
plan that are eligible to be guaranteed by
the PBGC, along with an explanation of
the limitations on the guarantee and the
circumstances under which such
limitations apply.
Paragraph (b)(9) of the proposed
regulation permits inclusion in the
notice of any additional information
that the administrator determines would
be helpful to understanding the
information required to be contained in
the notice.
Paragraphs (c) and (e) of the proposed
regulation, respectively, set forth the
form and manner requirements relating
to the notice. Paragraph (c) of the
proposed regulation provides that
notices shall be written in a manner
calculated to be understood by the
average plan participant. See 29 CFR
2520.102–2. Paragraph (e) of the
proposed regulation provides that
notices (except for notices to the PBGC)
shall be furnished in a manner
consistent with the requirements of 29
CFR 2520.104b–1. Collectively, these
requirements are intended to ensure that
notices are written so that the average
plan participant can understand them,
and that they are provided in a form
reasonably accessible to those
individuals eligible to receive the
notice. In addition, the Department
believes that plan administrators
already are familiar with the rules in
§§ 2520.102–2 and 2520.104b–1, thereby
easing the burden of compliance with
this regulation.
The Department worked with the
PBGC to develop model language for use
in connection with funding notices.
Such language is set forth in a model
notice in the appendix to the regulation.
Use of the model notice is not
mandatory. However, paragraph (g) of
the proposed regulation provides that,
by using the model notice, the plan
administrator will be deemed to satisfy
its duties with respect to the
requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of
the proposed regulation, except with
respect to information referenced in
paragraph (b)(9) of the regulation.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:30 Feb 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
Paragraph (d) provides that notices
shall be furnished within 9 months after
the close of the plan year, unless the
Internal Revenue Service has granted an
extension of time to file the annual
report, in which case the notice shall be
furnished within 2 months after the
close of the extension period. This
paragraph implements the requirements
of section 101(f)(3) of the Act, which
provides that annual funding notices
shall be provided to recipients no later
than two months after the deadline
(including extensions) for filing the
annual report for the plan year to which
the notice relates.
Paragraph (f) of the proposed
regulation delineates the persons to
whom funding notices required by this
section must be furnished. In an effort
to limit administrative burdens and
costs attendant to compliance with this
notice requirement, paragraph (f) of the
proposal limits an administrator’s
disclosure obligation to only individuals
who are participants on the last day of
the plan year to which the notice
relates, beneficiaries receiving benefits
under the plan on the last day of the
plan year to which the notice relates,
labor organizations representing
participants under the plan on the last
day of the plan year to which the notice
relates, and each employer that, as of
the last day of the plan year to which
the notice relates, is a party to the
collective bargaining agreement(s)
pursuant to which the plan is
maintained or who otherwise may be
subject to withdrawal liability. By
focusing on a person’s status on the last
day of the previous plan year, the plan
administrator is thereby relieved of
additional costs of tracking and
providing notice to individuals, labor
organizations and employers who may
no longer have an interest in the plan’s
funding condition.
Paragraph (f)(4) provides a more
detailed clarification of which
employers are entitled to an annual
funding notice. Specifically, the
language ‘‘is a party to the collective
bargaining agreement(s) pursuant to
which the plan is maintained’’ therein
is intended to cover not only employers
that have a present obligation to
contribute under the plan, but also those
whose obligation may be temporarily
suspended due to a funding holiday
granted by the plan’s board of trustees.
In addition, the Department, through its
use of the phrase ‘‘or who otherwise
may be subject to withdrawal liability,’’
intends to make it clear that, in the case
of plans that cover employees in the
building and construction industry,
entertainment industry, or trucking,
household goods moving and public
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
6307
warehousing industries, notice is
required for any employer that, as of the
last day of the plan year to which the
notice relates, has ceased to have an
obligation to contribute under the plan,
but has continued exposure to
withdrawal liability pursuant to section
4203(b), (c), or (d) of ERISA. The
clarification in paragraph (f)(4) is
intended to ensure that all employers
that have a direct financial interest in
the plan’s funding status will receive a
notice.
C. Request for Comments
The Department invites comments
from interested persons on all aspects of
the proposed regulation. Comments
should be addressed to the Office of
Regulations and Interpretations,
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Room N–5669, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210,
Attn: PFEA ’04 Project. Comments also
may be submitted electronically to eORI@dol.gov. All comments received
will be available for public inspection at
the Public Disclosure Room, N–1513,
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.
The Department has limited the
comment period to 30 days in order to
issue a final regulation on the earliest
possible date, taking into account
Congress’ expectation that regulations
would be issued not later than one year
from enactment of the PFEA ’04, which
was April 10, 2004. The Department
believes that, in light of the limited
number of issues presented for
consideration by the proposal, the
provided 30-day comment period
affords interested persons an adequate
amount of time to analyze the proposal
and submit comments.
D. Regulatory Impact Analysis
Summary
This proposed regulation contains a
model notice and other guidance
necessary to implement the
amendments made by new section
101(f) of ERISA, as enacted by section
103(a) of PFEA ’04. The regulation, if
adopted as proposed, will offer a model
notice to administrators of
multiemployer defined benefit plans,
which is expected to mitigate burden
and contribute to the efficiency of
compliance.
The multiemployer defined benefit
plan funding notice provision of PFEA
’04 was enacted amid concerns about
persisting low interest rates and
declines in equity values, each of which
has an increasing effect on contribution
E:\FR\FM\04FEP6.SGM
04FEP6
6308
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 23 / Friday, February 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules
requirements and a decreasing effect on
the funding levels of defined benefit
plans. More complete and timelier
disclosures were considered an
important element of measures enacted
in PFEA ’04 to strengthen the long-term
health of the defined benefit pension
system. Increasing the transparency of
information about the funding status of
multiemployer plans for participants
and beneficiaries, the labor
organizations representing them,
contributing employers, and PBGC will
afford all parties interested in the
financial viability of these plans greater
opportunity to monitor their funding
status.
According to a March 2004 Report by
the General Accounting Office 2 the
regulatory framework within which
multiemployer plans operate shifts
certain financial risks away from the
government and by implication the
taxpayer. Contributing employers to
multiemployer plans share the risk of
funding benefits for all participants, not
just those in their employment, and face
specific liabilities if they withdraw from
the plans. Participants in multiemployer
plans face lower benefit guaranties than
those in single-employer plans.
According to the GAO report, these
factors create incentives for participants
and employers to work together
constructively to find solutions to plans’
financial difficulties. These notices will
provide timely disclosure of information
concerning the funding status of these
plans to support the effort of all
interested parties to monitor their
financial condition and take action
where necessary.
The regulation would further afford
plan administrators greater certainty
that they have discharged their notice
obligation under section 101(f). The
proposed regulation is also intended to
clarify certain terms used in section
101(f) for the general purpose of
delineating those persons entitled to
receive the notice. The benefits of
greater efficiency, certainty, and clarity
are expected to be substantial, but
cannot be specifically quantified.
The cost of the multiemployer defined
benefit plan notices is expected to
amount to $777,000 in the year of
implementation, and $644,000 in each
subsequent year. The total estimated
cost includes the one-time development
of a notice by each plan, and the annual
preparation and mailing by the
administrators of all multiemployer
2 See GAO–04–423 Private Pensions.
Multiemployer Plans Face Short and Long-Term
Challenges. U.S. General Accounting Office, March
2004. General Accounting Office name changed to
Government Accountability Office effective July 7,
2004.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:30 Feb 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
defined benefit plans of the required
notices to plan participants and
beneficiaries, specified labor
organizations, employers that have an
obligation to contribute to these plans,
and to the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation. The first year estimate is
higher to account for the time required
for plan administrators to adapt and
review the model notice.
In this proposed regulation, the
Department has attempted to provide
guidance to assist administrators to
meet this objective the most
economically efficient way possible.
Because the costs of this proposal arise
from notice provisions in PFEA ’04, the
data and methodology used in
developing these estimates are more
fully described in the Paperwork
Reduction Act section of this analysis of
regulatory impact.
Executive Order 12866
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735), the Department must determine
whether a regulatory action is
‘‘significant’’ and therefore subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of the
Executive Order defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as an action that is
likely to result in a rule (1) having an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more, or adversely and
materially affecting a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local or tribal
governments or communities (also
referred to as ‘‘economically
significant’’); (2) creating serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfering
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) materially altering
the budgetary impacts of entitlement
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) raising novel legal or
policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order. It has been determined that this
proposed regulation is significant
within the meaning of section 3(f)(4) of
the Executive Order. OMB has,
therefore, reviewed this proposed
regulation pursuant to the Executive
Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
As part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, the Department of Labor
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing collections of
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA
95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This helps
to ensure that requested data can be
provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial
resources) is minimized, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
the impact of collection requirements on
respondents can be properly assessed.
Currently, EBSA is soliciting
comments concerning the proposed
information collection request (ICR)
included in the proposed regulation
regarding the Annual Funding Notice
for Defined Benefit Multiemployer
Pension Plans. A copy of the ICR may
be obtained by contacting the PRA
addressee shown below.
The Department has submitted a copy
of the proposed information collection
to OMB in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
3507(d) for review of its information
collections. The Department and OMB
are particularly interested in comments
that:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Comments should be sent to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10235, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503;
Attention: Desk Officer for the
Employee Benefits Security
Administration. Although comments
may be submitted through April 5, 2005,
OMB requests that comments be
received within 30 days of publication
of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to
ensure their consideration.
PRA Addressee: Address requests for
copies of the ICR to Gerald B. Lindrew,
Office of Policy and Research, U.S.
Department of Labor, Employee Benefits
Security Administration, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N–
5647, Washington, DC 20210.
E:\FR\FM\04FEP6.SGM
04FEP6
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 23 / Friday, February 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Telephone (202) 693–8410; Fax: (202)
219–5333. These are not toll-free
numbers.
The information collection provisions
of this proposed regulation are found in
§ 2520.101–4. A model notice is
provided in the Appendix to
§2520.101–4 to facilitate compliance
and moderate the burden attendant to
supplying notices to participants and
beneficiaries, labor organizations,
contributing employers, and PBGC as
required by PFEA ’04 and the proposed
regulation. Use of the model notice is
not mandatory; however, use of the
model will be deemed to satisfy the
requirements for content, style, and
format of the notice, except with respect
to any other information the plan
administrator elects to include. This
proposed regulation is also intended to
clarify certain of the PFEA ’04
requirements as to content, style and
format, manner of furnishing, and
persons entitled to receive notice.
In order to estimate the potential costs
of the notice provisions of section 101(f)
of ERISA and this proposed regulation,
the Department estimated the number of
multiemployer defined benefit plans,
and the numbers of participants,
beneficiaries receiving benefits, labor
organizations representing participants,
and employers that have an obligation
to contribute to these plans. The PBGC
Pension Insurance Data Book 2003
indicates that as of September 30, 2003,
there were 1,623 multiemployer defined
benefit plans with 9.7 million
participants and beneficiaries receiving
benefits. These estimates are based on
premium filings with PBGC for 2002,
projected by PBGC to 2003, generally
the most recent information currently
available. This total has been adjusted to
1,595 to reflect the exception from the
requirement to furnish a funding notice
for years in which a plan is receiving
financial assistance from PBGC.
The Department is not aware of a
direct source of information as to the
number of labor organizations that
represent participants of multiemployer
defined benefit plans and that would be
entitled to receive notice under section
101(f). As a proxy for this number, the
Department has relied on information
supplied by the Department’s
Employment Standards Administration,
Office of Labor Management Standards,
as to the number of labor organizations
that filed required annual reports for
their most recent fiscal year, generally
2002, at this time. The Department
adjusted the number provided by
excluding labor organizations that
appeared to represent only state, local,
and federal governmental employees to
account for the fact that such employees
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:30 Feb 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
are generally unlikely to be participants
in plans covered under Title I of ERISA.
The resulting estimate of labor
organizations entitled to receive notice
is 21,000. Although this number has
been used for purposes of this analysis,
it is believed that this number is an
upper bound for the actual number of
labor organizations that will receive
notice because it is likely that some
labor organizations do not represent
participants in defined benefit plans, or
that some labor organizations represent
only participants in single employer
plans not subject to section 101(f).
The Department is also unaware of a
source of information for the current
number of employers obligated to
contribute to multiemployer defined
benefit plans. PBGC assisted with
development of an estimate of this
number by providing the Department
with a tabulation on their 1987
premium filings of the number of
employers contributing to
multiemployer defined benefit plans at
that time. This was the last year this
data element was required to be
reported. The Department has attempted
to validate that 1987 figure by dividing
the number of participants in
multiemployer defined benefit plans in
the industries in which these plans are
most concentrated, such as
construction, trucking, and retail food
sales,3 by the average number of
employees per firm in those industries
based on data published by the Office of
Advocacy, U.S. Small Business
Administration for 2001. This
computation resulted in a figure that
was similar in magnitude, but somewhat
higher than the 277,600 employers
reported in the PBGC premium filing
data. As a result, the Department has
used 300,000 for its estimate of the
number of contributing employers to
whom the required notice will be sent.
For purposes of its estimates of
regulatory impact, then, the Department
has assumed that each plan will develop
a notice, and that each year the
multiemployer defined benefit plan
notices will be prepared and sent by the
administrators of 1,595 plans to 9.7
million participants and beneficiaries,
21,000 labor organizations, and 300,000
contributing employers, and to PBGC,
for a total of about 10 million notices.
It is assumed that the availability of
a model notice as provided in paragraph
(f) will lessen the time otherwise
required by a plan administrator to draft
a required notice. In developing burden
3 Multiemployer Plans Face Short and Long-Term
Challenges. U.S. General Accounting Office, March
2004. General Accounting Office name changed to
Government Accountability Office effective July 7,
2004. See GAO–04–423 Private Pensions.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
6309
estimates, the Department has included
one hour for reviewing and adapting the
model notice, and 30 minutes for
completing the notice for each plan.
Reviewing and adapting the notice is
expected to be performed by service
providers, specifically by legal counsel
at an hourly rate of $83. This accounts
for the estimated burden of developing
the notice, which amounts to about
$133,000 for the 1,595 plans.
Completing the notice by adding
information relevant to each year is
expected to take 30 minutes in the first
year of implementation, as well as in
subsequent years, and it is expected to
be performed by the same professionals
who are accounted for as preparing the
Summary Annual Report (SAR) for
plans, namely financial professionals at
the rate of $68 per hour. The assumed
preparation cost to plans to complete
the notice is therefore about $55,000 per
year. The total cost to plans to develop
and complete the notice in the year of
implementation is about $187,000.
The estimated distribution costs for
the notices are based on separate
assumptions for participant and
beneficiary notices versus the labor
organization, contributing employer,
and PBGC notices. The distribution cost
for the notices to participants and
beneficiaries is relatively modest
compared to the number of notices
because it is assumed that these notices
will be provided at the same time and
as part of the same mailing as the
Summary Annual Report. The mailing
costs for the SAR are already accounted
for in the ICR for the SAR, currently
approved under OMB Control Number
1210–0040. Therefore, only an
additional materials cost is accounted
for in the estimate of distribution costs
for participant and beneficiary notices,
which totals $292,000.
Distribution cost estimates for the
notices to labor organizations,
employers, and PBGC include $0.40 for
materials and postage, and two minutes
at a clerical wage rate of about $17 for
each notice. Total distribution costs to
labor organizations, contributing
employers, and PBGC, therefore, are
expected to total about $316,000.
Distribution costs for all notices are
estimated at $608,000.
In order to estimate the hour burden
of preparation and distribution of the
notices, the Department has generally
relied on the same assumptions used for
estimates of the burden of SAR
preparation and distribution.
Specifically, it is assumed that 100% of
notices are developed by service
providers, and that 90% of notices are
prepared and distributed by service
providers. Those activities are
E:\FR\FM\04FEP6.SGM
04FEP6
6310
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 23 / Friday, February 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules
appropriately accounted for as cost
burden, for which plans pay service
providers. The remaining 10% of
notices prepared and distributed in
house by plan administrators are
appropriately accounted for as hour
burden. Materials and mailing costs are
considered direct cost burden, as well.
The Department has not accounted here
for reductions in mailing and material
costs that might arise from the
electronic distribution of some notices.
Although such distribution may be
deemed to satisfy the requirements of
section 2520.104b–1(b)(1) with respect
to fulfilling the disclosure obligation if
conditions of section 2520.104b–1(c) are
satisfied, it is assumed for purposes of
these estimates that these funding
notices are less likely to be provided
electronically due to the nature of the
industries involved and the
relationships of the parties affected by
this requirement since the active
workers affected often do not have
access to e-mail at their workplaces. The
resulting hour and cost burden
estimates are shown below. The
Department requests comments on the
data, assumptions, and methodology
used in arriving at these estimates of
economic impact and PRA 95 burden.
Type of Review: New.
Agency: Department of Labor,
Employee Benefits Security Association.
Title: Multiemployer Defined Benefit
Plan Funding Notice.
OMB Number: 1210-NEW.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; Business or other for-profit;
Not-for-profit institutions.
Respondents: 1,595.
Frequency of Response: Annual.
Responses: 10,048,000.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,155.
Total Annualized Capital/Startup
Costs: $133,000.
Total Annual Cost (Operating and
Maintenance): $644,000.
Total Annualized Cost: $777,000.
OMB will consider comments
submitted in response to this request in
its review of the request for approval of
the ICR; these comments will also
become a matter of public record.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) (RFA) imposes
certain requirements with respect to
Federal rules that are subject to the
notice and comment requirements of
section 553(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.) and
which are likely to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Unless an
agency certifies that a proposed rule is
not likely to have a significant economic
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:30 Feb 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
impact on a substantial number of small
entities, section 603 of the RFA requires
that the agency present an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis at the time
of the publication of the notice of
proposed rulemaking describing the
impact of the rule on small entities and
seeking public comment on such
impact. Small entities include small
businesses, organizations and
governmental jurisdictions.
For purposes of analysis under the
RFA, the Employee Benefits Security
Administration (EBSA) proposes to
continue to consider a small entity to be
an employee benefit plan with fewer
than 100 participants. The basis of this
definition is found in section 104(a)(2)
of ERISA, which permits the Secretary
of Labor to prescribe simplified annual
reports for pension plans that cover
fewer than 100 participants. Under
section 104(a)(3), the Secretary may also
provide for exemptions or simplified
annual reporting and disclosure for
welfare benefit plans. Pursuant to the
authority of section 104(a)(3), the
Department has previously issued at 29
CFR 2520.104–20, 2520.104–21,
2520.104–41, 2520.104–46 and
2520.104b–10 certain simplified
reporting provisions and limited
exemptions from reporting and
disclosure requirements for small plans,
including unfunded or insured welfare
plans covering fewer than 100
participants and which satisfy certain
other requirements.
Further, while some large employers
may have small plans, in general small
employers maintain most small plans.
Thus, EBSA believes that assessing the
impact of this proposed rule on small
plans is an appropriate substitute for
evaluating the effect on small entities.
The definition of small entity
considered appropriate for this purpose
differs, however, from a definition of
small business that is based on size
standards promulgated by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR
121.201) pursuant to the Small Business
Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.). EBSA
therefore requests comments on the
appropriateness of the size standard
used in evaluating the impact of this
proposed rule on small entities. The
Department does not expect that the
plans potentially impacted by this
proposal will be small entities.
However, the Department requests
comments on the potential impact of
proposal on small entities, and on ways
in which any burdens on small entities
might be minimized.
EBSA has preliminarily determined
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. In support of
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
this determination, EBSA has prepared
the following initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
Section 103(c) of PFEA ’04 provides
that the Secretary of Labor shall issue
regulations (including a model notice)
necessary to implement the
amendments made by new section
101(f) of ERISA, as enacted by section
103(a) of PFEA ’04. Section 101(f) of
ERISA requires the administrator of a
multiemployer defined benefit pension
plan to furnish annually a notice of the
plan’s funded status to the plan’s
participants and beneficiaries and other
specified interested parties (each labor
organization representing such
participants and beneficiaries, each
employer that has an obligation to
contribute under the plan, and the
PBGC).
The conditions set forth in this
proposed regulation are intended to
satisfy the PFEA ’04 requirement that
the Secretary prescribe regulations
(including a model notice) necessary to
implement the amendments made by
section 103.
The proposed rule would impact
small plans that are multiemployer
defined benefit pension plans. It is
expected that the proposal will affect
approximately 10 small plans, and 800
participants in small plans.
The initial cost of the funding notice
for small plans is expected to be about
$82 per plan. Preparation of this
information is in most cases
accomplished by professionals that
provide services to employee benefit
plans.
The benefits of greater certainty
afforded fiduciaries by the model notice
are substantial but cannot be
specifically quantified.
To the Department’s knowledge, there
are no federal regulations that might
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the
proposed regulation for multiemployer
defined benefit pension plan funding
notices under section 101(f) of ERISA.
Congressional Review Act
The rules being issued here are
subject to the Congressional Review Act
provisions of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) and if
finalized will be sent to Congress and
the Comptroller General for review. The
rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as that term
is defined in 5 U.S.C. 804, because it is
not likely to result in (1) an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more; (2) a major increase in costs or
prices for consumers, individual
industries, or Federal, State, or local
government agencies, or geographic
regions; or (3) significant adverse effects
E:\FR\FM\04FEP6.SGM
04FEP6
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 23 / Friday, February 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules
on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
on the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and
export markets.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
For purposes of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4), as well as Executive Order
12875, this proposed regulation does
not include any Federal mandate that
may result in expenditures by State,
local, or tribal governments, and does
not impose an annual burden exceeding
$100 million on the private sector.
Federalism Statement
Executive Order 13132 (August 4,
1999) outlines fundamental principles
of federalism and requires the
adherence to specific criteria by Federal
agencies in the process of their
formulation and implementation of
policies that have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. This final
rule does not have federalism
implications because it has no
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Section 514 of
ERISA provides, with certain exceptions
specifically enumerated that are not
pertinent here, that the provisions of
Titles I and IV of ERISA supersede any
and all laws of the States as they relate
to any employee benefit plan covered
under ERISA. The requirements
implemented in this final rule do not
alter the fundamental reporting and
disclosure requirements of the statute
with respect to employee benefit plans,
and as such have no implications for the
States or the relationship or distribution
of power between the national
government and the States.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 2520
Accounting, Employee benefit plans,
Pensions, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department of Labor
proposes to amend 29 CFR part 2520 as
follows:
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:30 Feb 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
6311
reductions and suspensions (and the
potential effects of such limitations,
reductions, and suspensions on the
plan);
1. The authority citation for part 2520
(8) A general description of the
is revised to read as follows:
benefits under the plan which are
eligible to be guaranteed by the Pension
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1021–1025, 1027,
1029–31, 1059, 1134 and 1135; and Secretary Benefit Guaranty Corporation, along
of Labor’s Order 1–2003, 68 FR 5374 (Feb. 3,
with an explanation of the limitations
2003). Sec. 2520.101–2 also issued under 29
on the guarantee and the circumstances
U.S.C. 1132, 1181–1183, 1181 note, 1185,
under which such limitations apply;
1185a–b, 1191, and 1191a–c. Secs. 2520.102–
and
3, 2520.104b–1 and 2520.104b–3 also issued
(9) Any additional information that
under 29 U.S.C. 1003,1181–1183, 1181 note,
the plan administrator elects to include,
1185, 1185a–b, 1191, and 1191a–c. Secs.
provided that such information is
2520.104b–1 and 2520.107 also issued under
necessary or helpful to understanding
26 U.S.C. 401 note, 111 Stat. 788. Section
2520.101–4 also issued under sec. 103 of
the mandatory information in the
Pub. L. 108–218.
notice.
(c) Style and format of notice.
2. Add the following new section and
Funding notices shall be written in a
related appendix to subpart A:
manner calculated to be understood by
§ 2520.101–4 Annual funding notice for
the average plan participant.
multiemployer defined benefit pension
(d) When to furnish notice. A funding
plans.
notice shall be furnished within 9
(a) In general. (1) Except as provided
months after the close of the plan year,
in paragraph (a)(2) of this section,
unless the Internal Revenue Service has
pursuant to section 101(f) of the Act, the granted an extension of time to file the
administrator of a defined benefit,
annual report, in which case such
multiemployer pension plan shall
furnishing shall take place within 2
furnish annually to each person
months after the close of the extension
specified in paragraph (f) of this section period.
a funding notice that conforms to the
(e) Manner of furnishing notice. (1)
requirements of this section.
Except as provided in paragraph (e)(2)
(2) A plan administrator shall not be
of this section, funding notices shall be
required to furnish a funding notice for
furnished in any manner consistent
any plan year for which the plan is
with the requirements of § 2520.104b–1
receiving financial assistance from the
of this chapter, including paragraph (c)
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
of that section relating to the use of
pursuant to section 4261 of ERISA.
electronic media.
(b) Content of notice. A funding notice
(2) Notice shall be furnished to the
shall, consistent with the information
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
included in the plan’s Annual Return/
in a manner consistent with the
Report Form 5500 filed for the plan year requirements of part 4000 of this title.
to which the funding notice relates,
(f) Persons entitled to notice. Persons
include the following information:
entitled to notice under this section
(1) The name of the plan;
include:
(2) The address and phone number of
(1) Each participant covered under the
the plan administrator and the plan’s
plan on the last day of the plan year to
principal administrative officer (if
which the notice relates;
(2) Each beneficiary receiving benefits
different from the plan administrator);
(3) The plan sponsor’s employer
under the plan on the last day of the
identification number;
plan year to which the notice relates;
(4) The plan number;
(3) Each labor organization
(5) A statement as to whether the
representing participants under the plan
plan’s funded current liability
on the last day of the plan year to which
percentage (as defined in section
the notice relates;
302(d)(8)(B)) for the plan year to which
(4) Each employer that, as of the last
the notice relates is at least 100 percent
day of the plan year to which the notice
(and, if not, the actual percentage);
relates, is a party to the collective
(6) A statement of the market value of bargaining agreement(s) pursuant to
the plan’s assets (and valuation date),
which the plan is maintained or who
the amount of benefit payments, and the otherwise may be subject to withdrawal
ratio of the assets to the payments for
liability pursuant to section 4203 of the
the plan year to which the notice
Act; and
relates;
(5) The Pension Benefit Guaranty
(7) A summary of the rules governing
Corporation.
(g) Model notice. The appendix to this
insolvent multiemployer plans,
section contains a model notice that is
including the limitations on benefit
intended to assist plan administrators in
payments and any potential benefit
PART 2520—RULES AND
REGULATIONS FOR REPORTING AND
DISCLOSURE
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\04FEP6.SGM
04FEP6
6312
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 23 / Friday, February 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules
discharging their notice obligations
under this section. Use of the model
notice is not mandatory. However, use
of the model notice will be deemed to
satisfy the requirements of paragraphs
(b) and (c) of this section, except with
respect to information referenced in
paragraph (b)(9) of this section.
Appendix to § 2520.101–4—Annual
Funding Notice for [Insert name of
pension plan]
Introduction
This notice, which federal law requires all
multiemployer plans to send annually,
includes important information about the
funding level of [insert name, number, and
EIN of plan] (Plan). This notice also includes
information about rules governing insolvent
plans and benefit payments guaranteed by
the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
(PBGC), a federal agency. This notice is for
the plan year beginning [insert beginning
date] and ending [insert ending date] (Plan
Year).
Plan’s Funding Level
The Plan’s ‘‘funded current liability
percentage’’ for the Plan Year was [insert
percentage—see instructions below]. In
general, the higher the percentage, the better
funded the plan. The funded current liability
percentage, however, is not indicative of how
well a plan will be funded in the future or
if it terminates.
(Instructions: For purposes of computing
the ‘‘funded current liability percentage,’’
insert ratio of actuarial value of assets to
current liability, expressed as a percentage. If
the percentage is equal to or greater than 100
percent, you may insert ‘‘at least 100
percent.’’)
Plan’s Financial Information
The market value of the Plan’s assets as of
[insert valuation date] was [insert amount].
The total amount of benefit payments for the
Plan Year was [enter amount]. The ratio of
assets to benefit payments is [enter amount
calculated by dividing the value of plan
assets by the total benefit payments]. This
ratio suggests that the Plan’s assets could
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:30 Feb 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
provide for approximately [enter amount
calculated above] years of benefit payments
in annual amounts equal to what was paid
out in the Plan Year. However, the ratio does
not take into account future changes in total
benefit payments or plan assets.
Rules Governing Insolvent Plans
The law has special rules governing
insolvent multiemployer pension plans. A
plan is insolvent for a plan year if its
available financial resources are not
sufficient to pay benefits when due for the
plan year.
An insolvent plan must reduce benefit
payments to the highest level that can be
paid from the plan’s available financial
resources. If such resources are not enough
to pay benefits at a level specified by law (see
Benefit Payments Guaranteed by the PBGC,
below), the plan must apply to the PBGC for
financial assistance. The PBGC, by law, will
loan the plan the amount necessary to pay
benefits at the guaranteed level. Reduced
benefits may be restored if the plan’s
financial condition improves.
A plan that becomes insolvent must
provide prompt notification of the insolvency
to participants and beneficiaries, contributing
employers, labor unions representing
participants, and PBGC. In addition,
participants and beneficiaries also must
receive information regarding whether, and
how, their benefits will be reduced or
affected as a result of the insolvency,
including loss of a lump sum option. This
information will be provided for each year
the plan is insolvent.
Benefit Payments Guaranteed by the PBGC
The PBGC guarantees only vested benefits.
Specifically, it guarantees a monthly benefit
payment equal to 100 percent of the first $11
of the Plan’s monthly benefit accrual rate,
plus 75 percent of the next $33 of the accrual
rate, times each year of credited service. The
maximum guaranteed payment for a vested
retiree, therefore, is $35.75 per month times
each year of credited service.
Example 1: If a participant with 10 years
of credited service has an accrued monthly
benefit of $500, the accrual rate for purposes
of determining the PBGC guarantee would be
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
determined by dividing the monthly benefit
by the participant’s years of service ($500/
10), which equals $50. The guaranteed
amount for a $50 monthly accrual rate is
equal to the sum of $11 plus $24.75 (.75 ×
$33), or $35.75. Thus, the participant’s
guaranteed monthly benefit is $357.50
($35.75 × 10).
Example 2: If the participant in Example 1
has an accrued monthly benefit of $200, the
accrual rate for purposes of determining the
guarantee would be $20 (or $200/10). The
guaranteed amount for a $20 monthly accrual
rate is equal to the sum of $11 plus $6.75 (.75
× $9), or $17.75. Thus, the participant’s
guaranteed monthly benefit would be
$177.50 ($17.75 × 10).
In calculating a person’s monthly payment,
the PBGC will disregard any benefit increases
that were made under the plan within 60
months before insolvency. Similarly, the
PBGC does not guarantee pre-retirement
death benefits to a spouse or beneficiary (e.g.,
a qualified pre-retirement survivor annuity),
benefits above the normal retirement benefit,
disability benefits not in pay status, or nonpension benefits, such as health insurance,
life insurance, death benefits, vacation pay,
or severance pay.
Where To Get More Information
For more information about this notice,
you may contact [enter name of plan
administrator and, if applicable, principal
administrative officer], at [enter phone
number and address]. For more information
about the PBGC and multiemployer benefit
guarantees, go to PBGC’s Web site, http://
www.pbgc.gov, or call PBGC toll-free at 1–
800–400–7242 (TTY/TDD users may call the
Federal relay service toll free at 1–800–877–
8339 and ask to be connected to 1–800–400–
7242).
Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of
January, 2005.
Ann L. Combs,
Assistant Secretary, , Employee Benefits
Security Administration, Department of
Labor.
[FR Doc. 05–2151 Filed 2–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–29–P
E:\FR\FM\04FEP6.SGM
04FEP6
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 23 (Friday, February 4, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6306-6312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2151]
[[Page 6305]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part VII
Department of Labor
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Employee Benefits Security Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
29 CFR Part 2520
Annual Funding Notice for Multiemployer Defined Benefit Pension Plans;
Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 23 / Friday, February 4, 2005 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 6306]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security Administration
29 CFR Part 2520
RIN 1210-AB00
Annual Funding Notice for Multiemployer Defined Benefit Pension
Plans
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, DOL.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains a proposed regulation that, upon
adoption, would implement the notice requirement in section 101(f) of
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Section 103 of the
Pension Funding Equity Act of 2004 (PFEA '04) amended section 101 of
ERISA by adding a new subsection (f), which requires the administrator
of a multiemployer defined benefit plan to provide participants,
beneficiaries, and certain other parties, including the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation, with an annual funding notice indicating, among
other things, whether the plan's funded current liability percentage is
at least 100 percent. This document also contains a model notice that
may be used by plan administrators in discharging their duties under
section 101(f). This proposed regulation, upon adoption, will affect
plan administrators, participants, and beneficiaries of multiemployer
defined benefit pension plans, as well as labor organizations
representing such participants or beneficiaries and employers that have
an obligation to contribute under such plans.
DATES: Written comments on the proposed regulation should be received
by the Department of Labor on or before March 7, 2005. See ``C. Request
for Comments,'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to the Office of Regulations
and Interpretations, Employee Benefits Security Administration, Room N-
5669, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210, Attn: PFEA '04 Project. Comments also may be
submitted electronically to e-ORI@dol.gov. All comments received will
be available for public inspection at the Public Disclosure Room, N-
1513, Employee Benefits Security Administration, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie L. Ward, Office of
Regulations and Interpretations, Employee Benefits Security
Administration, (202) 693-8500. This is not a toll-free number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
Section 103(a) of the Pension Funding Equity Act of 2004, Pub. L.
108-218 (PFEA '04), which was enacted on April 10, 2004, added section
101(f) to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as
amended (ERISA or the Act). Section 101(f) provides that the
administrator of a defined benefit plan which is a multiemployer plan
shall for each plan year furnish a plan funding notice to each plan
participant and beneficiary, to each labor organization representing
such participants or beneficiaries, to each employer that has an
obligation to contribute under the plan, and to the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation. Section 103(b) of PFEA '04 amended section
502(c)(1) of ERISA to provide that any administrator who fails to meet
the requirements of section 101(f) with respect to a participant or
beneficiary may, in a court's discretion, be personally liable to such
participant or beneficiary in the amount of up to $100 a day from the
date of such failure or refusal and the court may in its discretion
order such other relief as it deems proper. Section 103(c) of PFEA '04
provides that the Secretary of Labor shall, not later than 1 year after
the date of the enactment of PFEA '04, issue regulations (including a
model notice) necessary to implement the amendments made by section
103. Section 103(d) of PFEA '04 provides that the amendments made by
section 103 of PFEA '04 shall apply to plan years beginning after
December 31, 2004.
B. Overview of Proposed Regulation
Paragraph (a) of the proposed regulation implements the
requirements set forth in section 101(f)(1) of the Act. This section in
general requires the administrator of a multiemployer defined benefit
pension plan to furnish annually a notice of the plan's funded status
to the plan's participants and beneficiaries and other specified
interested parties (each labor organization representing such
participants or beneficiaries, each employer that has an obligation to
contribute under the plan, and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
(PBGC)). Those persons entitled to the notice are further clarified in
paragraph (f) of the proposed regulation.
Paragraph (a)(2) provides a limited exception to the requirement to
furnish the annual funding notice. Under the exception, the plan
administrator of a plan receiving financial assistance from the PBGC is
not required to furnish the annual funding notice to the parties
otherwise entitled to such notice. The Department, after consulting
with the PBGC, is of the view that such notice would be of little, if
any, value to such parties in light of the PBGC's authority and
responsibility under title IV of ERISA with respect to insolvent
multiemployer plans.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The provisions of title IV of ERISA that apply in the
context of a plan's receipt of financial assistance from the PBGC
(sections 4245(e) and 4281(d)) ensure that participants and
beneficiaries of insolvent plans are adequately informed of, among
other things, their plan's funding status (including for
participants in pay status, their individual benefit levels), and
PBGC's benefit guarantees. In addition, PBGC receives plan financial
information before providing financial assistance. Inasmuch as the
foregoing title IV provisions are largely duplicative of the
requirements in section 101(f) of ERISA, an exception from the
requirements of section 101(f) for plans receiving financial
assistance necessarily would reduce administrative costs to these
plans, thereby increasing the plan's available resources for benefit
payments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paragraph (b) of the proposed regulation sets forth the content
requirements of the notice required under section 101(f). Paragraph (b)
requires that the identification and financial information included in
the notice is consistent with the information included in the plan's
Annual Return/Report filed for the plan year to which the notice
relates.
Specifically, paragraph (b)(1)-(4) provides that the notice shall
include: The name of the plan; the address and phone number of the plan
administrator and the plan's principal administrative officer (if
different from the plan administrator); the plan sponsor's employer
identification number (currently line 2(b) of the Annual Return/Report
Form 5500); and the plan number (currently line 1(b) of the Annual
Return/Report Form 5500).
Paragraph (b)(5)-(8) further provides that the notice shall include
information relevant to the plan's funding, including: a statement as
to whether the plan's funded current liability percentage (calculated
by dividing the actuarial value of the plan's assets (currently line
1b(2) of the Schedule B of the Annual Return/Report Form 5500) by the
current liability (currently line 2b(4), column (3), of the Schedule B
of the Annual Return/Report Form 5500) for the plan year to which the
notice relates is at least 100 percent (and, if not, the actual
percentage); a statement of the market value of the plan's assets
(currently line 1b(1) of the Schedule B of the Annual Return/Report
Form 5500) and the valuation date, the
[[Page 6307]]
amount of benefit payments for the plan year to which the notice
relates (currently line 2e(4) of the Schedule H of the Annual Return/
Report Form 5500), and the ratio of the assets to the benefit payments
for the plan year to which the notice relates; a summary of the rules
governing insolvent multiemployer plans, including the limitations on
benefit payments and any potential benefit reductions and suspensions
(and the potential effects of such limitations, reductions, and
suspensions on the plan); and a general description of the benefits
under the plan that are eligible to be guaranteed by the PBGC, along
with an explanation of the limitations on the guarantee and the
circumstances under which such limitations apply.
Paragraph (b)(9) of the proposed regulation permits inclusion in
the notice of any additional information that the administrator
determines would be helpful to understanding the information required
to be contained in the notice.
Paragraphs (c) and (e) of the proposed regulation, respectively,
set forth the form and manner requirements relating to the notice.
Paragraph (c) of the proposed regulation provides that notices shall be
written in a manner calculated to be understood by the average plan
participant. See 29 CFR 2520.102-2. Paragraph (e) of the proposed
regulation provides that notices (except for notices to the PBGC) shall
be furnished in a manner consistent with the requirements of 29 CFR
2520.104b-1. Collectively, these requirements are intended to ensure
that notices are written so that the average plan participant can
understand them, and that they are provided in a form reasonably
accessible to those individuals eligible to receive the notice. In
addition, the Department believes that plan administrators already are
familiar with the rules in Sec. Sec. 2520.102-2 and 2520.104b-1,
thereby easing the burden of compliance with this regulation.
The Department worked with the PBGC to develop model language for
use in connection with funding notices. Such language is set forth in a
model notice in the appendix to the regulation. Use of the model notice
is not mandatory. However, paragraph (g) of the proposed regulation
provides that, by using the model notice, the plan administrator will
be deemed to satisfy its duties with respect to the requirements of
paragraphs (b) and (c) of the proposed regulation, except with respect
to information referenced in paragraph (b)(9) of the regulation.
Paragraph (d) provides that notices shall be furnished within 9
months after the close of the plan year, unless the Internal Revenue
Service has granted an extension of time to file the annual report, in
which case the notice shall be furnished within 2 months after the
close of the extension period. This paragraph implements the
requirements of section 101(f)(3) of the Act, which provides that
annual funding notices shall be provided to recipients no later than
two months after the deadline (including extensions) for filing the
annual report for the plan year to which the notice relates.
Paragraph (f) of the proposed regulation delineates the persons to
whom funding notices required by this section must be furnished. In an
effort to limit administrative burdens and costs attendant to
compliance with this notice requirement, paragraph (f) of the proposal
limits an administrator's disclosure obligation to only individuals who
are participants on the last day of the plan year to which the notice
relates, beneficiaries receiving benefits under the plan on the last
day of the plan year to which the notice relates, labor organizations
representing participants under the plan on the last day of the plan
year to which the notice relates, and each employer that, as of the
last day of the plan year to which the notice relates, is a party to
the collective bargaining agreement(s) pursuant to which the plan is
maintained or who otherwise may be subject to withdrawal liability. By
focusing on a person's status on the last day of the previous plan
year, the plan administrator is thereby relieved of additional costs of
tracking and providing notice to individuals, labor organizations and
employers who may no longer have an interest in the plan's funding
condition.
Paragraph (f)(4) provides a more detailed clarification of which
employers are entitled to an annual funding notice. Specifically, the
language ``is a party to the collective bargaining agreement(s)
pursuant to which the plan is maintained'' therein is intended to cover
not only employers that have a present obligation to contribute under
the plan, but also those whose obligation may be temporarily suspended
due to a funding holiday granted by the plan's board of trustees. In
addition, the Department, through its use of the phrase ``or who
otherwise may be subject to withdrawal liability,'' intends to make it
clear that, in the case of plans that cover employees in the building
and construction industry, entertainment industry, or trucking,
household goods moving and public warehousing industries, notice is
required for any employer that, as of the last day of the plan year to
which the notice relates, has ceased to have an obligation to
contribute under the plan, but has continued exposure to withdrawal
liability pursuant to section 4203(b), (c), or (d) of ERISA. The
clarification in paragraph (f)(4) is intended to ensure that all
employers that have a direct financial interest in the plan's funding
status will receive a notice.
C. Request for Comments
The Department invites comments from interested persons on all
aspects of the proposed regulation. Comments should be addressed to the
Office of Regulations and Interpretations, Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Room N-5669, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210, Attn: PFEA '04 Project. Comments also
may be submitted electronically to e-ORI@dol.gov. All comments received
will be available for public inspection at the Public Disclosure Room,
N-1513, Employee Benefits Security Administration, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.
The Department has limited the comment period to 30 days in order
to issue a final regulation on the earliest possible date, taking into
account Congress' expectation that regulations would be issued not
later than one year from enactment of the PFEA '04, which was April 10,
2004. The Department believes that, in light of the limited number of
issues presented for consideration by the proposal, the provided 30-day
comment period affords interested persons an adequate amount of time to
analyze the proposal and submit comments.
D. Regulatory Impact Analysis
Summary
This proposed regulation contains a model notice and other guidance
necessary to implement the amendments made by new section 101(f) of
ERISA, as enacted by section 103(a) of PFEA '04. The regulation, if
adopted as proposed, will offer a model notice to administrators of
multiemployer defined benefit plans, which is expected to mitigate
burden and contribute to the efficiency of compliance.
The multiemployer defined benefit plan funding notice provision of
PFEA '04 was enacted amid concerns about persisting low interest rates
and declines in equity values, each of which has an increasing effect
on contribution
[[Page 6308]]
requirements and a decreasing effect on the funding levels of defined
benefit plans. More complete and timelier disclosures were considered
an important element of measures enacted in PFEA '04 to strengthen the
long-term health of the defined benefit pension system. Increasing the
transparency of information about the funding status of multiemployer
plans for participants and beneficiaries, the labor organizations
representing them, contributing employers, and PBGC will afford all
parties interested in the financial viability of these plans greater
opportunity to monitor their funding status.
According to a March 2004 Report by the General Accounting Office
\2\ the regulatory framework within which multiemployer plans operate
shifts certain financial risks away from the government and by
implication the taxpayer. Contributing employers to multiemployer plans
share the risk of funding benefits for all participants, not just those
in their employment, and face specific liabilities if they withdraw
from the plans. Participants in multiemployer plans face lower benefit
guaranties than those in single-employer plans. According to the GAO
report, these factors create incentives for participants and employers
to work together constructively to find solutions to plans' financial
difficulties. These notices will provide timely disclosure of
information concerning the funding status of these plans to support the
effort of all interested parties to monitor their financial condition
and take action where necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See GAO-04-423 Private Pensions. Multiemployer Plans Face
Short and Long-Term Challenges. U.S. General Accounting Office,
March 2004. General Accounting Office name changed to Government
Accountability Office effective July 7, 2004.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The regulation would further afford plan administrators greater
certainty that they have discharged their notice obligation under
section 101(f). The proposed regulation is also intended to clarify
certain terms used in section 101(f) for the general purpose of
delineating those persons entitled to receive the notice. The benefits
of greater efficiency, certainty, and clarity are expected to be
substantial, but cannot be specifically quantified.
The cost of the multiemployer defined benefit plan notices is
expected to amount to $777,000 in the year of implementation, and
$644,000 in each subsequent year. The total estimated cost includes the
one-time development of a notice by each plan, and the annual
preparation and mailing by the administrators of all multiemployer
defined benefit plans of the required notices to plan participants and
beneficiaries, specified labor organizations, employers that have an
obligation to contribute to these plans, and to the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation. The first year estimate is higher to account for
the time required for plan administrators to adapt and review the model
notice.
In this proposed regulation, the Department has attempted to
provide guidance to assist administrators to meet this objective the
most economically efficient way possible. Because the costs of this
proposal arise from notice provisions in PFEA '04, the data and
methodology used in developing these estimates are more fully described
in the Paperwork Reduction Act section of this analysis of regulatory
impact.
Executive Order 12866
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735), the Department must
determine whether a regulatory action is ``significant'' and therefore
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Section
3(f) of the Executive Order defines a ``significant regulatory action''
as an action that is likely to result in a rule (1) having an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and
materially affecting a sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State,
local or tribal governments or communities (also referred to as
``economically significant''); (2) creating serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfering with an action taken or planned by another
agency; (3) materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) raising novel legal or policy issues arising
out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order. It has been determined that this
proposed regulation is significant within the meaning of section
3(f)(4) of the Executive Order. OMB has, therefore, reviewed this
proposed regulation pursuant to the Executive Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, the Department of Labor conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the general public and federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing collections of
information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA
95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This helps to ensure that requested data
can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection requirements on respondents
can be properly assessed.
Currently, EBSA is soliciting comments concerning the proposed
information collection request (ICR) included in the proposed
regulation regarding the Annual Funding Notice for Defined Benefit
Multiemployer Pension Plans. A copy of the ICR may be obtained by
contacting the PRA addressee shown below.
The Department has submitted a copy of the proposed information
collection to OMB in accordance with 44 U.S.C. 3507(d) for review of
its information collections. The Department and OMB are particularly
interested in comments that:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
Comments should be sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503; Attention: Desk Officer for the
Employee Benefits Security Administration. Although comments may be
submitted through April 5, 2005, OMB requests that comments be received
within 30 days of publication of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to
ensure their consideration.
PRA Addressee: Address requests for copies of the ICR to Gerald B.
Lindrew, Office of Policy and Research, U.S. Department of Labor,
Employee Benefits Security Administration, 200 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Room N-5647, Washington, DC 20210.
[[Page 6309]]
Telephone (202) 693-8410; Fax: (202) 219-5333. These are not toll-free
numbers.
The information collection provisions of this proposed regulation
are found in Sec. 2520.101-4. A model notice is provided in the
Appendix to Sec. 2520.101-4 to facilitate compliance and moderate the
burden attendant to supplying notices to participants and
beneficiaries, labor organizations, contributing employers, and PBGC as
required by PFEA '04 and the proposed regulation. Use of the model
notice is not mandatory; however, use of the model will be deemed to
satisfy the requirements for content, style, and format of the notice,
except with respect to any other information the plan administrator
elects to include. This proposed regulation is also intended to clarify
certain of the PFEA '04 requirements as to content, style and format,
manner of furnishing, and persons entitled to receive notice.
In order to estimate the potential costs of the notice provisions
of section 101(f) of ERISA and this proposed regulation, the Department
estimated the number of multiemployer defined benefit plans, and the
numbers of participants, beneficiaries receiving benefits, labor
organizations representing participants, and employers that have an
obligation to contribute to these plans. The PBGC Pension Insurance
Data Book 2003 indicates that as of September 30, 2003, there were
1,623 multiemployer defined benefit plans with 9.7 million participants
and beneficiaries receiving benefits. These estimates are based on
premium filings with PBGC for 2002, projected by PBGC to 2003,
generally the most recent information currently available. This total
has been adjusted to 1,595 to reflect the exception from the
requirement to furnish a funding notice for years in which a plan is
receiving financial assistance from PBGC.
The Department is not aware of a direct source of information as to
the number of labor organizations that represent participants of
multiemployer defined benefit plans and that would be entitled to
receive notice under section 101(f). As a proxy for this number, the
Department has relied on information supplied by the Department's
Employment Standards Administration, Office of Labor Management
Standards, as to the number of labor organizations that filed required
annual reports for their most recent fiscal year, generally 2002, at
this time. The Department adjusted the number provided by excluding
labor organizations that appeared to represent only state, local, and
federal governmental employees to account for the fact that such
employees are generally unlikely to be participants in plans covered
under Title I of ERISA. The resulting estimate of labor organizations
entitled to receive notice is 21,000. Although this number has been
used for purposes of this analysis, it is believed that this number is
an upper bound for the actual number of labor organizations that will
receive notice because it is likely that some labor organizations do
not represent participants in defined benefit plans, or that some labor
organizations represent only participants in single employer plans not
subject to section 101(f).
The Department is also unaware of a source of information for the
current number of employers obligated to contribute to multiemployer
defined benefit plans. PBGC assisted with development of an estimate of
this number by providing the Department with a tabulation on their 1987
premium filings of the number of employers contributing to
multiemployer defined benefit plans at that time. This was the last
year this data element was required to be reported. The Department has
attempted to validate that 1987 figure by dividing the number of
participants in multiemployer defined benefit plans in the industries
in which these plans are most concentrated, such as construction,
trucking, and retail food sales,\3\ by the average number of employees
per firm in those industries based on data published by the Office of
Advocacy, U.S. Small Business Administration for 2001. This computation
resulted in a figure that was similar in magnitude, but somewhat higher
than the 277,600 employers reported in the PBGC premium filing data. As
a result, the Department has used 300,000 for its estimate of the
number of contributing employers to whom the required notice will be
sent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Multiemployer Plans Face Short and Long-Term Challenges.
U.S. General Accounting Office, March 2004. General Accounting
Office name changed to Government Accountability Office effective
July 7, 2004. See GAO-04-423 Private Pensions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For purposes of its estimates of regulatory impact, then, the
Department has assumed that each plan will develop a notice, and that
each year the multiemployer defined benefit plan notices will be
prepared and sent by the administrators of 1,595 plans to 9.7 million
participants and beneficiaries, 21,000 labor organizations, and 300,000
contributing employers, and to PBGC, for a total of about 10 million
notices.
It is assumed that the availability of a model notice as provided
in paragraph (f) will lessen the time otherwise required by a plan
administrator to draft a required notice. In developing burden
estimates, the Department has included one hour for reviewing and
adapting the model notice, and 30 minutes for completing the notice for
each plan. Reviewing and adapting the notice is expected to be
performed by service providers, specifically by legal counsel at an
hourly rate of $83. This accounts for the estimated burden of
developing the notice, which amounts to about $133,000 for the 1,595
plans. Completing the notice by adding information relevant to each
year is expected to take 30 minutes in the first year of
implementation, as well as in subsequent years, and it is expected to
be performed by the same professionals who are accounted for as
preparing the Summary Annual Report (SAR) for plans, namely financial
professionals at the rate of $68 per hour. The assumed preparation cost
to plans to complete the notice is therefore about $55,000 per year.
The total cost to plans to develop and complete the notice in the year
of implementation is about $187,000.
The estimated distribution costs for the notices are based on
separate assumptions for participant and beneficiary notices versus the
labor organization, contributing employer, and PBGC notices. The
distribution cost for the notices to participants and beneficiaries is
relatively modest compared to the number of notices because it is
assumed that these notices will be provided at the same time and as
part of the same mailing as the Summary Annual Report. The mailing
costs for the SAR are already accounted for in the ICR for the SAR,
currently approved under OMB Control Number 1210-0040. Therefore, only
an additional materials cost is accounted for in the estimate of
distribution costs for participant and beneficiary notices, which
totals $292,000.
Distribution cost estimates for the notices to labor organizations,
employers, and PBGC include $0.40 for materials and postage, and two
minutes at a clerical wage rate of about $17 for each notice. Total
distribution costs to labor organizations, contributing employers, and
PBGC, therefore, are expected to total about $316,000. Distribution
costs for all notices are estimated at $608,000.
In order to estimate the hour burden of preparation and
distribution of the notices, the Department has generally relied on the
same assumptions used for estimates of the burden of SAR preparation
and distribution. Specifically, it is assumed that 100% of notices are
developed by service providers, and that 90% of notices are prepared
and distributed by service providers. Those activities are
[[Page 6310]]
appropriately accounted for as cost burden, for which plans pay service
providers. The remaining 10% of notices prepared and distributed in
house by plan administrators are appropriately accounted for as hour
burden. Materials and mailing costs are considered direct cost burden,
as well. The Department has not accounted here for reductions in
mailing and material costs that might arise from the electronic
distribution of some notices. Although such distribution may be deemed
to satisfy the requirements of section 2520.104b-1(b)(1) with respect
to fulfilling the disclosure obligation if conditions of section
2520.104b-1(c) are satisfied, it is assumed for purposes of these
estimates that these funding notices are less likely to be provided
electronically due to the nature of the industries involved and the
relationships of the parties affected by this requirement since the
active workers affected often do not have access to e-mail at their
workplaces. The resulting hour and cost burden estimates are shown
below. The Department requests comments on the data, assumptions, and
methodology used in arriving at these estimates of economic impact and
PRA 95 burden.
Type of Review: New.
Agency: Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security
Association.
Title: Multiemployer Defined Benefit Plan Funding Notice.
OMB Number: 1210-NEW.
Affected Public: Individuals or households; Business or other for-
profit; Not-for-profit institutions.
Respondents: 1,595.
Frequency of Response: Annual.
Responses: 10,048,000.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,155.
Total Annualized Capital/Startup Costs: $133,000.
Total Annual Cost (Operating and Maintenance): $644,000.
Total Annualized Cost: $777,000.
OMB will consider comments submitted in response to this request in
its review of the request for approval of the ICR; these comments will
also become a matter of public record.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) (RFA) imposes
certain requirements with respect to Federal rules that are subject to
the notice and comment requirements of section 553(b) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.) and which are
likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. Unless an agency certifies that a proposed rule is not
likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities, section 603 of the RFA requires that the agency present
an initial regulatory flexibility analysis at the time of the
publication of the notice of proposed rulemaking describing the impact
of the rule on small entities and seeking public comment on such
impact. Small entities include small businesses, organizations and
governmental jurisdictions.
For purposes of analysis under the RFA, the Employee Benefits
Security Administration (EBSA) proposes to continue to consider a small
entity to be an employee benefit plan with fewer than 100 participants.
The basis of this definition is found in section 104(a)(2) of ERISA,
which permits the Secretary of Labor to prescribe simplified annual
reports for pension plans that cover fewer than 100 participants. Under
section 104(a)(3), the Secretary may also provide for exemptions or
simplified annual reporting and disclosure for welfare benefit plans.
Pursuant to the authority of section 104(a)(3), the Department has
previously issued at 29 CFR 2520.104-20, 2520.104-21, 2520.104-41,
2520.104-46 and 2520.104b-10 certain simplified reporting provisions
and limited exemptions from reporting and disclosure requirements for
small plans, including unfunded or insured welfare plans covering fewer
than 100 participants and which satisfy certain other requirements.
Further, while some large employers may have small plans, in
general small employers maintain most small plans. Thus, EBSA believes
that assessing the impact of this proposed rule on small plans is an
appropriate substitute for evaluating the effect on small entities. The
definition of small entity considered appropriate for this purpose
differs, however, from a definition of small business that is based on
size standards promulgated by the Small Business Administration (SBA)
(13 CFR 121.201) pursuant to the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et
seq.). EBSA therefore requests comments on the appropriateness of the
size standard used in evaluating the impact of this proposed rule on
small entities. The Department does not expect that the plans
potentially impacted by this proposal will be small entities. However,
the Department requests comments on the potential impact of proposal on
small entities, and on ways in which any burdens on small entities
might be minimized.
EBSA has preliminarily determined that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
In support of this determination, EBSA has prepared the following
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
Section 103(c) of PFEA '04 provides that the Secretary of Labor
shall issue regulations (including a model notice) necessary to
implement the amendments made by new section 101(f) of ERISA, as
enacted by section 103(a) of PFEA '04. Section 101(f) of ERISA requires
the administrator of a multiemployer defined benefit pension plan to
furnish annually a notice of the plan's funded status to the plan's
participants and beneficiaries and other specified interested parties
(each labor organization representing such participants and
beneficiaries, each employer that has an obligation to contribute under
the plan, and the PBGC).
The conditions set forth in this proposed regulation are intended
to satisfy the PFEA '04 requirement that the Secretary prescribe
regulations (including a model notice) necessary to implement the
amendments made by section 103.
The proposed rule would impact small plans that are multiemployer
defined benefit pension plans. It is expected that the proposal will
affect approximately 10 small plans, and 800 participants in small
plans.
The initial cost of the funding notice for small plans is expected
to be about $82 per plan. Preparation of this information is in most
cases accomplished by professionals that provide services to employee
benefit plans.
The benefits of greater certainty afforded fiduciaries by the model
notice are substantial but cannot be specifically quantified.
To the Department's knowledge, there are no federal regulations
that might duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the proposed regulation
for multiemployer defined benefit pension plan funding notices under
section 101(f) of ERISA.
Congressional Review Act
The rules being issued here are subject to the Congressional Review
Act provisions of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) and if finalized will be sent to
Congress and the Comptroller General for review. The rule is not a
``major rule'' as that term is defined in 5 U.S.C. 804, because it is
not likely to result in (1) an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more; (2) a major increase in costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, or Federal, State, or local government agencies,
or geographic regions; or (3) significant adverse effects
[[Page 6311]]
on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on
the ability of United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-
based enterprises in domestic and export markets.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
For purposes of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104-4), as well as Executive Order 12875, this proposed regulation does
not include any Federal mandate that may result in expenditures by
State, local, or tribal governments, and does not impose an annual
burden exceeding $100 million on the private sector.
Federalism Statement
Executive Order 13132 (August 4, 1999) outlines fundamental
principles of federalism and requires the adherence to specific
criteria by Federal agencies in the process of their formulation and
implementation of policies that have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. This final rule does not have federalism
implications because it has no substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Section 514 of ERISA provides, with certain
exceptions specifically enumerated that are not pertinent here, that
the provisions of Titles I and IV of ERISA supersede any and all laws
of the States as they relate to any employee benefit plan covered under
ERISA. The requirements implemented in this final rule do not alter the
fundamental reporting and disclosure requirements of the statute with
respect to employee benefit plans, and as such have no implications for
the States or the relationship or distribution of power between the
national government and the States.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 2520
Accounting, Employee benefit plans, Pensions, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of Labor
proposes to amend 29 CFR part 2520 as follows:
PART 2520--RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE
1. The authority citation for part 2520 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1021-1025, 1027, 1029-31, 1059, 1134 and
1135; and Secretary of Labor's Order 1-2003, 68 FR 5374 (Feb. 3,
2003). Sec. 2520.101-2 also issued under 29 U.S.C. 1132, 1181-1183,
1181 note, 1185, 1185a-b, 1191, and 1191a-c. Secs. 2520.102-3,
2520.104b-1 and 2520.104b-3 also issued under 29 U.S.C. 1003,1181-
1183, 1181 note, 1185, 1185a-b, 1191, and 1191a-c. Secs. 2520.104b-1
and 2520.107 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 401 note, 111 Stat. 788.
Section 2520.101-4 also issued under sec. 103 of Pub. L. 108-218.
2. Add the following new section and related appendix to subpart A:
Sec. 2520.101-4 Annual funding notice for multiemployer defined
benefit pension plans.
(a) In general. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section, pursuant to section 101(f) of the Act, the administrator of a
defined benefit, multiemployer pension plan shall furnish annually to
each person specified in paragraph (f) of this section a funding notice
that conforms to the requirements of this section.
(2) A plan administrator shall not be required to furnish a funding
notice for any plan year for which the plan is receiving financial
assistance from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation pursuant to
section 4261 of ERISA.
(b) Content of notice. A funding notice shall, consistent with the
information included in the plan's Annual Return/Report Form 5500 filed
for the plan year to which the funding notice relates, include the
following information:
(1) The name of the plan;
(2) The address and phone number of the plan administrator and the
plan's principal administrative officer (if different from the plan
administrator);
(3) The plan sponsor's employer identification number;
(4) The plan number;
(5) A statement as to whether the plan's funded current liability
percentage (as defined in section 302(d)(8)(B)) for the plan year to
which the notice relates is at least 100 percent (and, if not, the
actual percentage);
(6) A statement of the market value of the plan's assets (and
valuation date), the amount of benefit payments, and the ratio of the
assets to the payments for the plan year to which the notice relates;
(7) A summary of the rules governing insolvent multiemployer plans,
including the limitations on benefit payments and any potential benefit
reductions and suspensions (and the potential effects of such
limitations, reductions, and suspensions on the plan);
(8) A general description of the benefits under the plan which are
eligible to be guaranteed by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation,
along with an explanation of the limitations on the guarantee and the
circumstances under which such limitations apply; and
(9) Any additional information that the plan administrator elects
to include, provided that such information is necessary or helpful to
understanding the mandatory information in the notice.
(c) Style and format of notice. Funding notices shall be written in
a manner calculated to be understood by the average plan participant.
(d) When to furnish notice. A funding notice shall be furnished
within 9 months after the close of the plan year, unless the Internal
Revenue Service has granted an extension of time to file the annual
report, in which case such furnishing shall take place within 2 months
after the close of the extension period.
(e) Manner of furnishing notice. (1) Except as provided in
paragraph (e)(2) of this section, funding notices shall be furnished in
any manner consistent with the requirements of Sec. 2520.104b-1 of
this chapter, including paragraph (c) of that section relating to the
use of electronic media.
(2) Notice shall be furnished to the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation in a manner consistent with the requirements of part 4000
of this title.
(f) Persons entitled to notice. Persons entitled to notice under
this section include:
(1) Each participant covered under the plan on the last day of the
plan year to which the notice relates;
(2) Each beneficiary receiving benefits under the plan on the last
day of the plan year to which the notice relates;
(3) Each labor organization representing participants under the
plan on the last day of the plan year to which the notice relates;
(4) Each employer that, as of the last day of the plan year to
which the notice relates, is a party to the collective bargaining
agreement(s) pursuant to which the plan is maintained or who otherwise
may be subject to withdrawal liability pursuant to section 4203 of the
Act; and
(5) The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
(g) Model notice. The appendix to this section contains a model
notice that is intended to assist plan administrators in
[[Page 6312]]
discharging their notice obligations under this section. Use of the
model notice is not mandatory. However, use of the model notice will be
deemed to satisfy the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this
section, except with respect to information referenced in paragraph
(b)(9) of this section.
Appendix to Sec. 2520.101-4--Annual Funding Notice for [Insert name of
pension plan]
Introduction
This notice, which federal law requires all multiemployer plans
to send annually, includes important information about the funding
level of [insert name, number, and EIN of plan] (Plan). This notice
also includes information about rules governing insolvent plans and
benefit payments guaranteed by the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation (PBGC), a federal agency. This notice is for the plan
year beginning [insert beginning date] and ending [insert ending
date] (Plan Year).
Plan's Funding Level
The Plan's ``funded current liability percentage'' for the Plan
Year was [insert percentage--see instructions below]. In general,
the higher the percentage, the better funded the plan. The funded
current liability percentage, however, is not indicative of how well
a plan will be funded in the future or if it terminates.
(Instructions: For purposes of computing the ``funded current
liability percentage,'' insert ratio of actuarial value of assets to
current liability, expressed as a percentage. If the percentage is
equal to or greater than 100 percent, you may insert ``at least 100
percent.'')
Plan's Financial Information
The market value of the Plan's assets as of [insert valuation
date] was [insert amount]. The total amount of benefit payments for
the Plan Year was [enter amount]. The ratio of assets to benefit
payments is [enter amount calculated by dividing the value of plan
assets by the total benefit payments]. This ratio suggests that the
Plan's assets could provide for approximately [enter amount
calculated above] years of benefit payments in annual amounts equal
to what was paid out in the Plan Year. However, the ratio does not
take into account future changes in total benefit payments or plan
assets.
Rules Governing Insolvent Plans
The law has special rules governing insolvent multiemployer
pension plans. A plan is insolvent for a plan year if its available
financial resources are not sufficient to pay benefits when due for
the plan year.
An insolvent plan must reduce benefit payments to the highest
level that can be paid from the plan's available financial
resources. If such resources are not enough to pay benefits at a
level specified by law (see Benefit Payments Guaranteed by the PBGC,
below), the plan must apply to the PBGC for financial assistance.
The PBGC, by law, will loan the plan the amount necessary to pay
benefits at the guaranteed level. Reduced benefits may be restored
if the plan's financial condition improves.
A plan that becomes insolvent must provide prompt notification
of the insolvency to participants and beneficiaries, contributing
employers, labor unions representing participants, and PBGC. In
addition, participants and beneficiaries also must receive
information regarding whether, and how, their benefits will be
reduced or affected as a result of the insolvency, including loss of
a lump sum option. This information will be provided for each year
the plan is insolvent.
Benefit Payments Guaranteed by the PBGC
The PBGC guarantees only vested benefits. Specifically, it
guarantees a monthly benefit payment equal to 100 percent of the
first $11 of the Plan's monthly benefit accrual rate, plus 75
percent of the next $33 of the accrual rate, times each year of
credited service. The maximum guaranteed payment for a vested
retiree, therefore, is $35.75 per month times each year of credited
service.
Example 1: If a participant with 10 years of credited service
has an accrued monthly benefit of $500, the accrual rate for
purposes of determining the PBGC guarantee would be determined by
dividing the monthly benefit by the participant's years of service
($500/10), which equals $50. The guaranteed amount for a $50 monthly
accrual rate is equal to the sum of $11 plus $24.75 (.75 x $33), or
$35.75. Thus, the participant's guaranteed monthly benefit is
$357.50 ($35.75 x 10).
Example 2: If the participant in Example 1 has an accrued
monthly benefit of $200, the accrual rate for purposes of
determining the guarantee would be $20 (or $200/10). The guaranteed
amount for a $20 monthly accrual rate is equal to the sum of $11
plus $6.75 (.75 x $9), or $17.75. Thus, the participant's guaranteed
monthly benefit would be $177.50 ($17.75 x 10).
In calculating a person's monthly payment, the PBGC will
disregard any benefit increases that were made under the plan within
60 months before insolvency. Similarly, the PBGC does not guarantee
pre-retirement death benefits to a spouse or beneficiary (e.g., a
qualified pre-retirement survivor annuity), benefits above the
normal retirement benefit, disability benefits not in pay status, or
non-pension benefits, such as health insurance, life insurance,
death benefits, vacation pay, or severance pay.
Where To Get More Information
For more information about this notice, you may contact [enter
name of plan administrator and, if applicable, principal
administrative officer], at [enter phone number and address]. For
more information about the PBGC and multiemployer benefit
guarantees, go to PBGC's Web site, http://www.pbgc.gov, or call PBGC
toll-free at 1-800-400-7242 (TTY/TDD users may call the Federal
relay service toll free at 1-800-877-8339 and ask to be connected to
1-800-400-7242).
Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of January, 2005.
Ann L. Combs,
Assistant Secretary, , Employee Benefits Security Administration,
Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 05-2151 Filed 2-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-29-P