Self Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to Voluntary Supplemental Procedures for Selecting Arbitrators, 5716-5718 [E5-405]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
5716
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 22 / Thursday, February 3, 2005 / Notices
the Code of Arbitration Procedure was
amended to read as follows:
The term ‘‘public arbitrator’’ means a
person who is otherwise qualified to serve as
an arbitrator and * * * (iv) is not an
attorney, accountant, or other professional
whose firm derived 10 percent or more of its
annual revenue in the past 2 years from any
persons or entities listed in paragraph
(a)(4)(A) * * *.
Some arbitrators who also serve as
mediators were of the opinion that the
rule change encompassed income in the
form of mediation fees paid by industry
parties such that these individuals
would no longer qualify as public
arbitrators under the new rule.
The NASD Dispute Resolution Board
determined that the rule could be
construed broadly enough to cover
revenue derived from serving as a
mediator, although this was clearly not
the intent of the recent rule changes,
and unanimously voted to issue a
clarification in an IM that would be
printed in the Code following Rule
10308.
The IM also would make clear that
mediation services performed by
mediators who are also arbitrators is not
to be included in the definition of
‘‘professional work’’ for purposes of the
20% test either, so long as the mediator
is acting in the capacity of a mediator
and is not representing a party in the
mediation.
In considering this matter, the NASD
Dispute Resolution Board also
determined that parties may wish to
know that an arbitrator on their list also
serves as a mediator and may be familiar
with the industry parties or their
counsel. NASD staff will add this
information to the disclosure forms of
dual arbitrators/mediators.
2. Statutory Basis
NASD believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the provisions
of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,5 which
requires, among other things, that the
NASD’s rules must be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. NASD believes that any
potential conflict is best addressed by
ensuring that arbitrators who are
mediators disclose this fact in the
arbitrator disclosure history. NASD will
prepare materials to inform arbitrators
of the need to make this disclosure.
5 15
U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:18 Feb 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
NASD Regulation does not believe
that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
II. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed
Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve such proposed
rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NASD–2005–007 on the
subject line.
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the NASD. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASD–2005–007 and
should be submitted on or before
February 24, 2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–407 Filed 2–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–51085; File No. SR–NYSE–
2005–10]
Self Regulatory Organizations; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of Proposed Rule Change by the New
York Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to
Voluntary Supplemental Procedures
for Selecting Arbitrators
January 27, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1)1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,
notice is hereby given that on January
18, 2005, the New York Stock Exchange,
Paper Comments
Inc. (‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
• Send paper comments in triplicate
the Securities and Exchange
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
Securities and Exchange Commission,
proposed amendments to its arbitration
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
rules as described in Items I and II
20549–0609.
below, which items have been prepared
All submissions should refer to File
by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the
Number SR–NASD–2005–007. This file
proposed rule change pursuant to
number should be included on the
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder,4 which renders
Commission process and review your
the proposal effective upon filing with
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
6 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
post all comments on the Commission’s
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
submission, all subsequent
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM
03FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 22 / Thursday, February 3, 2005 / Notices
the Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change consists of
an extension until July 31, 2005, of the
Voluntary Supplemental Procedures for
Selecting Arbitrators (‘‘Supplemental
Procedures’’).
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change. The text of
these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in Sections A, B and C below,
of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The proposed rule change is intended
to extend until July 31, 2005 the
Supplemental Procedures, which were
approved by the Commission, most
recently in SR–NYSE–2004–28,5 for a
six-month period ending January 31,
2005.
The Exchange currently has several
methods by which arbitrators are
assigned to cases, including the
traditional method under NYSE Rule
607, pursuant to which Exchange staff
appoints arbitrators to cases (the
‘‘Traditional Method’’). On August 1,
2000, the Exchange implemented a twoyear pilot program to allow parties, on
a voluntary basis, to select arbitrators
under two alternative methods (in
addition to the Traditional Method).6
Upon expiration of the two-year pilot,
the Exchange renewed the pilot for an
additional two years, which expired on
July 31, 2004,7 and then again for an
additional six months through January
31, 2005.8
5 See Exchange Act Release No. 49915 (June 25,
2004), 69 FR 39993 (July 1, 2004).
6 See Exchange Act Release No. 43214 (August 28,
2000), 65 FR 53247 (September 1, 2000) (SR–NYSE–
00–34).
7 See Exchange Act Release No. 46372. See also
Exchange Act Release No. 47929 (May 27, 2003), 68
FR 32791 (June 2, 2003) (SR–NYSE–2003–15).
8 See Exchange Act Release No. 49915, supra note
5.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:18 Feb 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
Under the Supplemental Procedures,
the first alternative to the Traditional
Method is the Random List Selection
method by which the parties are
provided randomly generated lists of
public-classified and securitiesclassified arbitrators. The parties have
ten days to strike and rank the names on
the lists. Based on mutual ranking of the
lists, the highest-ranking arbitrators are
invited to serve on the case. If a panel
cannot be generated from the first list,
a second list is generated, with three
potential arbitrators for each vacancy,
and one peremptory challenge available
to each party for each vacancy. If
vacancies remain after the second list
has been processed, arbitrators are then
randomly assigned to serve, subject only
to challenges for cause.
The second alternative to the
Traditional Method is entitled
Enhanced List Selection, in which six
public-classified and three securitiesclassified arbitrators are selected, based
on their qualifications and expertise, by
Exchange staff. The lists are then sent to
the parties. The parties have a limited
number of strikes to use and are
required to rank the arbitrators not
stricken. Based on mutual ranking of the
lists, the highest-ranking arbitrators are
invited to serve on the case.
Finally, the Supplemental Procedures
provide that the Exchange will
accommodate the use of any reasonable
alternative method of selecting
arbitrators that the parties decide upon,
provided that the parties agree. Absent
agreement as to the use of Random List
Selection, Enhanced List Selection, or
any other reasonable alternative
method, the Traditional Method is used.
The Exchange, pursuant to a separate
filing,9 is proposing amendments to
NYSE Rule 607 which would, in effect,
make permanent a variation of the pilot
program described herein. Pending
Commission consideration of those
amendments, the Exchange proposes to
extend the pilot period for the
Supplemental Procedures for an
additional six months, until July 31,
2005.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(5)10 of the Act in that it
promotes just and equitable principles
of trade by ensuring that members and
member organizations and the public
have a fair and impartial forum for the
resolution of their disputes.
9 See SR–NYSE–2005–02, filed with the
Commission on January 4, 2005.
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5717
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received from
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has designated the
proposed rule change as one that: (i)
Does not significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) does not impose any
significant burden on competition; and
(iii) does not become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was
filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate. Therefore,
the foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act11 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)12
thereunder. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears
to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the Act.
Pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) under
the Act,13 the proposal may not become
operative for 30 days after the date of its
filing, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest, and the Exchange must
file notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change at least five
business days beforehand. The
Exchange has requested that the
Commission waive the five-day prefiling requirement and the 30-day
operative delay so that the proposed
rule change will become immediately
effective upon filing.
The Commission is exercising its
authority to waive the five-day pre-filing
requirement and believes that waiver of
the 30-day operative delay is consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest.14 In this regard, the
11 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
13 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
14 For purposes only of accelerating the operative
date of this proposal, the Commission has
12 17
E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM
Continued
03FEN1
5718
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 22 / Thursday, February 3, 2005 / Notices
Commission notes that the proposal is
the extension of a pilot program that has
been in effect at the Exchange since
August 2000. For these reasons, the
Commission designates the proposed
rule change as effective and operative
immediately. Nothing in the current
notice should be interpreted as
suggesting the Commission is
predisposed to approving the proposed
variation of the pilot program.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NYSE–2005–10 on the
subject line.
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2005–10 and should
be submitted on or before March 10,
2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–405 Filed 2–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
Aviation Proceedings, Agreements
Filed the Week Ending January 14,
2005
The following Agreements Were Filed
With the Department of Transportation
Under the Provisions of 49 U.S.C. 412
and 414. Answers May Be Filed Within
21 Days After the Filing of the
Application
Paper Comments
Docket Number: OST–2005–20074.
Date Filed: January 10, 2005.
• Send paper comments in triplicate
Parties: Members of the International
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Air Transport Association.
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Subject:
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
20549–0609.
PTC3 0798 dated 21 December 2004
All submissions should refer to File
TC3 Areawide Resolutions r1–r8
Number SR–NYSE–2005–10. This file
PTC3 0799 dated 21 December 2004
TC3 Within South Asian
number should be included on the
Subcontinent Resolutions r9–r18
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
PTC3 0800 dated 21 December 2004
Commission process and review your
TC3 Within South East Asia except
comments more efficiently, please use
between Malaysia and Guam
only one method. The Commission will
Resolutions r19–r32
post all comments on the Commission’s
PTC3 0801 dated 21 December 2004
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
TC3 Within South East Asia between
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
Malaysia and Guam Resolutions
submission, all subsequent
r33–r37
amendments, all written statements
PTC3 0802 dated 21 December 2004
with respect to the proposed rule
TC3 Within South West Pacific except
change that are filed with the
between French Polynesia and
Commission, and all written
American Samoa Resolutions r38–
communications relating to the
r48
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than PTC3 0803 dated 21 December 2004
TC3 Within South West Pacific
those that may be withheld from the
between French Polynesia and
public in accordance with the
American Samoa Resolutions r49–
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
r52
available for inspection and copying in
PTC3 0804 dated 21 December 2004
the Commission’s Public Reference
TC3 South East Asia-South Asian
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
Subcontinent Resolutions r53–r60
available for inspection and copying at
PTC3 0805 dated 21 December 2004
the principal office of the NASD. All
TC3 South Asian Subcontinent-South
comments received will be posted
West Pacific Resolutions r61–r67
without change; the Commission does
PTC3 0806 dated 21 December 2004
not edit personal identifying
TC3 South East Asia-South West
Pacific except between Malaysia
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:18 Feb 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and American Samoa Resolutions
r68–r74
PTC3 0807 dated 21 December 2004
TC3 South East Asia-South West
Pacific between Malaysia and
American Samoa Resolutions r75–
r80
PTC3 0808 dated 21 December 2004
TC3 Japan-Korea Resolutions r81–r92
PTC3 0809 dated 21 December 2004
TC3 Japan, Korea-South Asian
Subcontinent Resolutions r93–r106
PTC3 0810 dated 21 December 2004
TC3 Japan, Korea-South West Pacific
except between Korea (Rep. of) and
American Samoa Resolutions r107–
r161
PTC3 0811 dated 21 December 2004
TC3 Japan, Korea-South West Pacific
between Korea (Rep. of) and
American Samoa Resolutions r162–
r166
Minutes: PTC3 0814 dated 11 January
2005
Tables: PTC3 Fares 0316 dated 21
December 2004
TC3 Within South Asian
Subcontinent Fares Tables
PTC3 Fares 0317 dated 1 December
2004
TC3 Within South East Asia Fares
Tables
PTC3 Fares 0318 dated 21 December
2004
TC3 Within South West Pacific Fares
Tables
PTC3 Fares 0319 dated 21 December
2004
TC3 South East Asia-South Asian
Subcontinent Fares Tables
PTC3 Fares 0320 dated 21 December
2004
TC3 South Asian Subcontinent-South
West Pacific Fares Tables
PTC3 Fares 0321 dated 21 December
2004
TC3 South East Asia-South West
Pacific Fares Tables
PTC3 Fares 0322 dated 21 December
2004
TC3 Japan-Korea Fares Tables
PTC3 Fares 0323 dated 21 December
2004
TC3 Japan, Korea-South Asian
Subcontinent Fares Tables
PTC3 Fares 0324 dated 21 December
2004
TC3 Japan, Korea-South West Pacific
Fares Tables
Intended effective date: 1 April 2005
Docket Number: OST–2005–20101.
Date Filed: January 13, 2005.
Parties: Members of the International
Air Transport Association.
Subject:
PTC23 ME–TC3 0224 dated 14 January
2005
Mail Vote 429—Resolution 010e Special
Passenger Amending Resolution
E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM
03FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 22 (Thursday, February 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5716-5718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-405]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-51085; File No. SR-NYSE-2005-10]
Self Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. Relating to Voluntary Supplemental Procedures for Selecting
Arbitrators
January 27, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1)\1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act''),\2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, notice is hereby given
that on January 18, 2005, the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE''
or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed amendments to its arbitration rules as
described in Items I and II below, which items have been prepared by
the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\
which renders the proposal effective upon filing with
[[Page 5717]]
the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change consists of an extension until July 31,
2005, of the Voluntary Supplemental Procedures for Selecting
Arbitrators (``Supplemental Procedures'').
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The proposed rule change is intended to extend until July 31, 2005
the Supplemental Procedures, which were approved by the Commission,
most recently in SR-NYSE-2004-28,\5\ for a six-month period ending
January 31, 2005.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Exchange Act Release No. 49915 (June 25, 2004), 69 FR
39993 (July 1, 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange currently has several methods by which arbitrators are
assigned to cases, including the traditional method under NYSE Rule
607, pursuant to which Exchange staff appoints arbitrators to cases
(the ``Traditional Method''). On August 1, 2000, the Exchange
implemented a two-year pilot program to allow parties, on a voluntary
basis, to select arbitrators under two alternative methods (in addition
to the Traditional Method).\6\ Upon expiration of the two-year pilot,
the Exchange renewed the pilot for an additional two years, which
expired on July 31, 2004,\7\ and then again for an additional six
months through January 31, 2005.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Exchange Act Release No. 43214 (August 28, 2000), 65 FR
53247 (September 1, 2000) (SR-NYSE-00-34).
\7\ See Exchange Act Release No. 46372. See also Exchange Act
Release No. 47929 (May 27, 2003), 68 FR 32791 (June 2, 2003) (SR-
NYSE-2003-15).
\8\ See Exchange Act Release No. 49915, supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the Supplemental Procedures, the first alternative to the
Traditional Method is the Random List Selection method by which the
parties are provided randomly generated lists of public-classified and
securities-classified arbitrators. The parties have ten days to strike
and rank the names on the lists. Based on mutual ranking of the lists,
the highest-ranking arbitrators are invited to serve on the case. If a
panel cannot be generated from the first list, a second list is
generated, with three potential arbitrators for each vacancy, and one
peremptory challenge available to each party for each vacancy. If
vacancies remain after the second list has been processed, arbitrators
are then randomly assigned to serve, subject only to challenges for
cause.
The second alternative to the Traditional Method is entitled
Enhanced List Selection, in which six public-classified and three
securities-classified arbitrators are selected, based on their
qualifications and expertise, by Exchange staff. The lists are then
sent to the parties. The parties have a limited number of strikes to
use and are required to rank the arbitrators not stricken. Based on
mutual ranking of the lists, the highest-ranking arbitrators are
invited to serve on the case.
Finally, the Supplemental Procedures provide that the Exchange will
accommodate the use of any reasonable alternative method of selecting
arbitrators that the parties decide upon, provided that the parties
agree. Absent agreement as to the use of Random List Selection,
Enhanced List Selection, or any other reasonable alternative method,
the Traditional Method is used.
The Exchange, pursuant to a separate filing,\9\ is proposing
amendments to NYSE Rule 607 which would, in effect, make permanent a
variation of the pilot program described herein. Pending Commission
consideration of those amendments, the Exchange proposes to extend the
pilot period for the Supplemental Procedures for an additional six
months, until July 31, 2005.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See SR-NYSE-2005-02, filed with the Commission on January 4,
2005.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b)(5)\10\ of the Act in that it promotes just and
equitable principles of trade by ensuring that members and member
organizations and the public have a fair and impartial forum for the
resolution of their disputes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as one that:
(i) Does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the
public interest; (ii) does not impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) does not become operative for 30 days from the
date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may
designate. Therefore, the foregoing rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act\11\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)\12\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) under the Act,\13\ the proposal
may not become operative for 30 days after the date of its filing, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest, and the Exchange
must file notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days beforehand. The Exchange has requested that
the Commission waive the five-day pre-filing requirement and the 30-day
operative delay so that the proposed rule change will become
immediately effective upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission is exercising its authority to waive the five-day
pre-filing requirement and believes that waiver of the 30-day operative
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest.\14\ In this regard, the
[[Page 5718]]
Commission notes that the proposal is the extension of a pilot program
that has been in effect at the Exchange since August 2000. For these
reasons, the Commission designates the proposed rule change as
effective and operative immediately. Nothing in the current notice
should be interpreted as suggesting the Commission is predisposed to
approving the proposed variation of the pilot program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ For purposes only of accelerating the operative date of
this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2005-10 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20549-0609.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2005-10. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the NASD. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSE-2005-10 and should be submitted on or before March
10, 2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-405 Filed 2-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
