Stainless Steel Plate in Coil From Belgium: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2999-3000 [E5-196]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2005 / Notices
and Border Protection within 15 days of
publication of this notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is in accordance with
section 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, and 19 CFR
251.213(d)(4).
Dated: January 11, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–195 Filed 1–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–423–808]
Stainless Steel Plate in Coil From
Belgium: Amended Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 14, 2004, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the final results
of its administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on stainless
steel plate in coils from Belgium for the
period May 1, 2002, through April 30,
2003. See Stainless Steel Plate in Coils
from Belgium: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 69 FR 74495 (December 14,
2004) (Final Results). We are amending
our Final Results to correct ministerial
AGENCY:
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:11 Jan 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
errors alleged by Ugine and ALZ
Belgium (Respondent) pursuant to
section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act).
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 19, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni
Page or Elfi Blum, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 6, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–1398 or (202) 482–0197,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Antidumping Duty Order
Effective March 11, 2003, in
accordance with Allegheny Ludlum
Corp. v. United States, 287 F.3d 1365
(Fed. Cir. 2002) remanded to CIT No.
99–06–00361, slip op. 2002–147 (CIT
Dec. 12, 2002), and Notice of Amended
Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain
Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from
Belgium, Canada, Italy, the Republic of
Korea, South Africa, and Taiwan, 68 FR
11520 (March 11, 2003), the scope of
this order was amended. Therefore, for
purposes of this review, there were
separate scopes in effect during the
period of review (POR).
Scope of Order From May 1, 2002
Through March 10, 2003
The product covered by this order is
certain stainless steel plate in coils.
Stainless steel is an alloy steel
containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or
less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more
of chromium, with or without other
elements. The subject plate products are
flat-rolled products, 254 mm or over in
width and 4.75 mm or more in
thickness, in coils, and annealed or
otherwise heat treated and pickled or
otherwise descaled. The subject plate
may also be further processed (e.g.,
cold-rolled, polished, etc.) provided that
it maintains the specified dimensions of
plate following such processing.
Excluded from the scope of this order
are the following: (1) Plate not in coils,
(2) plate that is not annealed or
otherwise heat treated and pickled or
otherwise descaled, (3) sheet and strip,
and (4) flat bars. In addition, certain
cold-rolled stainless steel plate in coils
is also excluded from the scope of this
order. The excluded cold-rolled
stainless steel plate in coils is defined as
that merchandise which meets the
physical characteristics described above
that has undergone a cold-reduction
process that reduced the thickness of
the steel by 25 percent or more, and has
been annealed and pickled after this
cold reduction process.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2999
The merchandise subject to this order
is currently classifiable in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTS) at subheadings:
7219110030, 7219110060, 7219120005,
7219120020, 7219120025, 7219120050,
7219120055, 7219120065, 7219120070,
7219120080, 7219900010, 7219900020,
7219900025, 7219900060, 7219900080,
7220110000, 7220201010, 7220201015,
7220201060, 7220201080, 7220206005,
7220206010, 7220206015, 7220206060,
7220206080, 7220900010, 7220900015,
7220900060, and 7220900080. Although
the HTS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of this
order is dispositive.
Scope of Order on or After March 11,
2003
The product covered by this order is
certain stainless steel plate in coils.
Stainless steel is an alloy steel
containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or
less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more
of chromium, with or without other
elements. The subject plate products are
flat-rolled products, 254 mm or over in
width and 4.75 mm or more in
thickness, in coils, and annealed or
otherwise heat treated and pickled or
otherwise descaled. The subject plate
may also be further processed (e.g.,
cold-rolled, polished, etc.) provided that
it maintains the specified dimensions of
plate following such processing.
Excluded from the scope of this order
are the following: (1) Plate not in coils,
(2) plate that is not annealed or
otherwise heat treated and pickled or
otherwise descaled, (3) sheet and strip,
and (4) flat bars.
The merchandise subject to this order
is currently classifiable in the HTS at
subheadings: 7219.11.00.30,
7219.11.00.60, 7219.12.00.06,
7219.12.00.21, 7219.12.00.26,
7219.12.00.51, 7219.12.00.56,
7219.12.00.66, 7219.12.00.71,
7219.12.00.81, 7219.31.00.10,
7219.90.00.10, 7219.90.00.20,
7219.90.00.25, 7219.90.00.60,
7219.90.00.80, 7220.11.00.00,
7220.20.10.10, 7220.20.10.15,
7220.20.10.60, 7220.20.10.80,
7220.20.60.05, 7220.20.60.10,
7220.20.60.15, 7220.20.60.60,
7220.20.60.80, 7220.90.00.10,
7220.90.00.15, 7220.90.00.60, and
7220.90.00.80. Although the HTS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
subject to these orders is dispositive.
Amendment of Final Results
On December 14, 2004, the
Department published the Final Results
E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM
19JAN1
3000
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2005 / Notices
of the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on stainless
steel plate in coils for the period May 1,
2002, through April 30, 2003. See Final
Results. In accordance with section
751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.224(c)(2), on December 14, 2004,
Respondent timely filed an allegation
that the Department made ministerial
errors in the final results. The
Department is amending the Final
Results to correct these errors, as
detailed below.
First, Respondent states that the
Department expressed its intention to
correct certain gross unit prices in the
home market sales database based on
pre-verification corrections, as stated in
the Memorandum to The File from Toni
Page and Elfi Blum through Maria
MacKay: Analysis for Ugine & ALZ, N.V.
Belgium (U&A Belgium) for the Final
Results of the Fourth Administrative
Review of Stainless Steel Plate in Coils
(SSPC) from Belgium, dated December
7, 2004 (Analysis Memorandum).
Respondent further states that the
Department, in making those changes in
the home market (HM) sales program,
identifies the sales to be corrected by
referring to the observation number of
those sales. However, Respondent
contends, the observation numbers
identified in the Department’s HM sales
program are not the observation
numbers of the sales the Department
intended to correct. Respondent
provided a list of the observation
numbers Respondent claims are the
correct numbers,1 and states that the
Department should use these numbers
in identifying the appropriate sales.
Second, Respondent alleges that the
Department, when recalculating the HM
credit expense to account for a revision
to the HM short-term borrowing rate in
the HM sales program, inadvertently
subtracted the date of payment from the
date of shipment. The appropriate
method for determining credit expenses,
Respondent argues, is to subtract the
date of shipment from the date of
payment. Third, Respondent argues,
that the Department failed to recalculate inventory carrying cost based
on the revised short-term borrowing
rate. Petitioners did not file comments
in response to Respondent’s ministerial
error allegations.
The Act, and the Department’s
regulations, define a ministerial error as
one involving ‘‘addition, subtraction, or
other arithmetic function, clerical error
resulting from inaccurate copying,
1 Respondent attached the sales verification
exhibit 1, showing the invoice number, the skid
number, the originally reported gross unit price, the
corrected gross unit price, and the weight of the
skid.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:11 Jan 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
duplication or the like, and any other
similar type of unintentional error
which the Secretary considers
ministerial.’’ See section 751(h) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f).
After reviewing Respondent’s
allegations, we have determined, in
accordance with section 751(h) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.224, that the three
allegations constitute ministerial errors.
Regarding its first allegation, we agree
with Respondent that the Department
inadvertently identified the incorrect
observation numbers for those sales
with a revised gross unit price. See
Analysis Memorandum, p. 2–3. Further,
as Respondent alleged, when
recalculating credit expenses based on
the revised interest rate obtained at
verification, we erroneously subtracted
the pay date from the ship date to arrive
at the credit period instead of
subtracting ship date from pay date. We
also agree with Respondent’s final
allegation that we inadvertently failed to
recalculate the inventory carrying costs
based on the revised interest rate.
Therefore, we are amending the Final
Results to correct the above-mentioned
ministerial errors. All changes to the
programming language in the HM sales
program can be found in the analysis
memorandum for the amended final
results. See Memorandum to The File
from Toni Page and Elfi Blum through
Maria MacKay: Analysis for Ugine &
ALZ, N.V. Belgium (U&A Belgium) for
the Amended Final Results of the
Fourth Administrative Review of
Stainless Steel Plate in Coils (SSPC)
from Belgium, dated January 13, 2005
(Amended Final Analysis Memo). As a
result of corrections of the ministerial
errors in the Final Results, the revised
weight-averaged dumping margin is as
follows:
Revised
margin
(percent)
Manufacturer/exporter
Ugine & ALZ Belgium ....................
2.71
With respect to Ugine & ALZ, N.V.
Belgium (U&A Belgium), the
Department will issue appropriate
assessment instructions to U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) within 15
days of publication of the amended final
results of review. Accordingly, the
Department will determine, and CBP
will assess, antidumping duties on all
entries of subject merchandise from
U&A Belgium during the period May 1,
2002, through April 30, 2003, in
accordance with these amended final
results. The revised cash deposit rate for
U&A Belgium shown above is effective
on all shipments of the subject
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication of this
notice, and will remain in effect until
publication of the final results of the
next administrative review.
Consequently, we are issuing and
publishing these amended final results
and notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1), 751(h), and 777(i) of the Act,
and 19 CFR 351.224(f).
Dated: January 12, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–196 Filed 1–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting
TIME AND DATE:
11 a.m., Friday, February
25, 2005.
1155 21st St., NW., Washington,
DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference
Room.
PLACE:
STATUS:
Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
Surveillance
Matters.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Jean A. Webb, (202) 418–5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–1114 Filed 1–14–05; 11:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–M
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting
TIME AND DATE:
11 a.m., Friday, February
11, 2005.
1155 21st St., NW., Washington,
DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference
Room.
PLACE:
STATUS:
Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
Surveillance
Matters.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Jean A. Webb, (202) 418–5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–1115 Filed 1–14–05; 11:46 am]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–M
E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM
19JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2999-3000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-196]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-423-808]
Stainless Steel Plate in Coil From Belgium: Amended Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 14, 2004, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the final results of its administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on stainless steel plate in coils from
Belgium for the period May 1, 2002, through April 30, 2003. See
Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Belgium: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 69 FR 74495 (December 14, 2004)
(Final Results). We are amending our Final Results to correct
ministerial errors alleged by Ugine and ALZ Belgium (Respondent)
pursuant to section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act).
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 19, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Page or Elfi Blum, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
1398 or (202) 482-0197, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Antidumping Duty Order
Effective March 11, 2003, in accordance with Allegheny Ludlum Corp.
v. United States, 287 F.3d 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2002) remanded to CIT No.
99-06-00361, slip op. 2002-147 (CIT Dec. 12, 2002), and Notice of
Amended Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Stainless Steel Plate in Coils
from Belgium, Canada, Italy, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and
Taiwan, 68 FR 11520 (March 11, 2003), the scope of this order was
amended. Therefore, for purposes of this review, there were separate
scopes in effect during the period of review (POR).
Scope of Order From May 1, 2002 Through March 10, 2003
The product covered by this order is certain stainless steel plate
in coils. Stainless steel is an alloy steel containing, by weight, 1.2
percent or less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more of chromium, with or
without other elements. The subject plate products are flat-rolled
products, 254 mm or over in width and 4.75 mm or more in thickness, in
coils, and annealed or otherwise heat treated and pickled or otherwise
descaled. The subject plate may also be further processed (e.g., cold-
rolled, polished, etc.) provided that it maintains the specified
dimensions of plate following such processing. Excluded from the scope
of this order are the following: (1) Plate not in coils, (2) plate that
is not annealed or otherwise heat treated and pickled or otherwise
descaled, (3) sheet and strip, and (4) flat bars. In addition, certain
cold-rolled stainless steel plate in coils is also excluded from the
scope of this order. The excluded cold-rolled stainless steel plate in
coils is defined as that merchandise which meets the physical
characteristics described above that has undergone a cold-reduction
process that reduced the thickness of the steel by 25 percent or more,
and has been annealed and pickled after this cold reduction process.
The merchandise subject to this order is currently classifiable in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS) at
subheadings: 7219110030, 7219110060, 7219120005, 7219120020,
7219120025, 7219120050, 7219120055, 7219120065, 7219120070, 7219120080,
7219900010, 7219900020, 7219900025, 7219900060, 7219900080, 7220110000,
7220201010, 7220201015, 7220201060, 7220201080, 7220206005, 7220206010,
7220206015, 7220206060, 7220206080, 7220900010, 7220900015, 7220900060,
and 7220900080. Although the HTS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope
of this order is dispositive.
Scope of Order on or After March 11, 2003
The product covered by this order is certain stainless steel plate
in coils. Stainless steel is an alloy steel containing, by weight, 1.2
percent or less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more of chromium, with or
without other elements. The subject plate products are flat-rolled
products, 254 mm or over in width and 4.75 mm or more in thickness, in
coils, and annealed or otherwise heat treated and pickled or otherwise
descaled. The subject plate may also be further processed (e.g., cold-
rolled, polished, etc.) provided that it maintains the specified
dimensions of plate following such processing. Excluded from the scope
of this order are the following: (1) Plate not in coils, (2) plate that
is not annealed or otherwise heat treated and pickled or otherwise
descaled, (3) sheet and strip, and (4) flat bars.
The merchandise subject to this order is currently classifiable in
the HTS at subheadings: 7219.11.00.30, 7219.11.00.60, 7219.12.00.06,
7219.12.00.21, 7219.12.00.26, 7219.12.00.51, 7219.12.00.56,
7219.12.00.66, 7219.12.00.71, 7219.12.00.81, 7219.31.00.10,
7219.90.00.10, 7219.90.00.20, 7219.90.00.25, 7219.90.00.60,
7219.90.00.80, 7220.11.00.00, 7220.20.10.10, 7220.20.10.15,
7220.20.10.60, 7220.20.10.80, 7220.20.60.05, 7220.20.60.10,
7220.20.60.15, 7220.20.60.60, 7220.20.60.80, 7220.90.00.10,
7220.90.00.15, 7220.90.00.60, and 7220.90.00.80. Although the HTS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise subject to these orders is
dispositive.
Amendment of Final Results
On December 14, 2004, the Department published the Final Results
[[Page 3000]]
of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on stainless
steel plate in coils for the period May 1, 2002, through April 30,
2003. See Final Results. In accordance with section 751(h) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.224(c)(2), on December 14, 2004, Respondent timely filed
an allegation that the Department made ministerial errors in the final
results. The Department is amending the Final Results to correct these
errors, as detailed below.
First, Respondent states that the Department expressed its
intention to correct certain gross unit prices in the home market sales
database based on pre-verification corrections, as stated in the
Memorandum to The File from Toni Page and Elfi Blum through Maria
MacKay: Analysis for Ugine & ALZ, N.V. Belgium (U&A Belgium) for the
Final Results of the Fourth Administrative Review of Stainless Steel
Plate in Coils (SSPC) from Belgium, dated December 7, 2004 (Analysis
Memorandum).
Respondent further states that the Department, in making those
changes in the home market (HM) sales program, identifies the sales to
be corrected by referring to the observation number of those sales.
However, Respondent contends, the observation numbers identified in the
Department's HM sales program are not the observation numbers of the
sales the Department intended to correct. Respondent provided a list of
the observation numbers Respondent claims are the correct numbers,\1\
and states that the Department should use these numbers in identifying
the appropriate sales. Second, Respondent alleges that the Department,
when recalculating the HM credit expense to account for a revision to
the HM short-term borrowing rate in the HM sales program, inadvertently
subtracted the date of payment from the date of shipment. The
appropriate method for determining credit expenses, Respondent argues,
is to subtract the date of shipment from the date of payment. Third,
Respondent argues, that the Department failed to re-calculate inventory
carrying cost based on the revised short-term borrowing rate.
Petitioners did not file comments in response to Respondent's
ministerial error allegations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Respondent attached the sales verification exhibit 1,
showing the invoice number, the skid number, the originally reported
gross unit price, the corrected gross unit price, and the weight of
the skid.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Act, and the Department's regulations, define a ministerial
error as one involving ``addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic
function, clerical error resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication
or the like, and any other similar type of unintentional error which
the Secretary considers ministerial.'' See section 751(h) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.224(f).
After reviewing Respondent's allegations, we have determined, in
accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224, that the
three allegations constitute ministerial errors. Regarding its first
allegation, we agree with Respondent that the Department inadvertently
identified the incorrect observation numbers for those sales with a
revised gross unit price. See Analysis Memorandum, p. 2-3. Further, as
Respondent alleged, when recalculating credit expenses based on the
revised interest rate obtained at verification, we erroneously
subtracted the pay date from the ship date to arrive at the credit
period instead of subtracting ship date from pay date. We also agree
with Respondent's final allegation that we inadvertently failed to
recalculate the inventory carrying costs based on the revised interest
rate. Therefore, we are amending the Final Results to correct the
above-mentioned ministerial errors. All changes to the programming
language in the HM sales program can be found in the analysis
memorandum for the amended final results. See Memorandum to The File
from Toni Page and Elfi Blum through Maria MacKay: Analysis for Ugine &
ALZ, N.V. Belgium (U&A Belgium) for the Amended Final Results of the
Fourth Administrative Review of Stainless Steel Plate in Coils (SSPC)
from Belgium, dated January 13, 2005 (Amended Final Analysis Memo). As
a result of corrections of the ministerial errors in the Final Results,
the revised weight-averaged dumping margin is as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer/exporter Revised margin (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ugine & ALZ Belgium....................... 2.71
------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to Ugine & ALZ, N.V. Belgium (U&A Belgium), the
Department will issue appropriate assessment instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) within 15 days of publication of
the amended final results of review. Accordingly, the Department will
determine, and CBP will assess, antidumping duties on all entries of
subject merchandise from U&A Belgium during the period May 1, 2002,
through April 30, 2003, in accordance with these amended final results.
The revised cash deposit rate for U&A Belgium shown above is effective
on all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of this
notice, and will remain in effect until publication of the final
results of the next administrative review.
Consequently, we are issuing and publishing these amended final
results and notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1), 751(h), and
777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.224(f).
Dated: January 12, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E5-196 Filed 1-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P