Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China, 779-780 [05-195]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2005 / Notices Dated: December 29, 2004. Barbara E. Tillman, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 05–194 Filed 1–4–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration A–122–822 Notice of Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Canada Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: January 5, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Carey or Douglas Kirby, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–3964 and (202) 482–3782, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background The Department published the antidumping duty order on certain corrosion–resistant carbon steel flat products (CORE) from Canada on August 19, 1993 (58 FR 44162). Based on timely requests, in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act, on September 30, 2003, the Department initiated an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on CORE from Canada, covering the period August 1, 2002, through July 31, 2003. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, Request for Revocation in Part and Deferral of Administrative Reviews, 68 FR 56262 (September 30, 2003). This administrative review was initiated on the following exporters: Continuous Colour Coat, Ltd. (‘‘CCC’’), Dofasco Inc. (‘‘Dofasco’’), Ideal Roofing Company, Ltd. (‘‘Ideal Roofing’’), Impact Steel Canada, Ltd. (‘‘Impact Steel’’), Russel Metals Export (‘‘Russel Metals’’), Sorevco and Company, Ltd. (‘‘Sorevco’’), and Stelco Inc. (‘‘Stelco’’). On December 19, 2003, the Department published a rescission, in part, of its administrative review with respect to CCC, Impact Steel, and Ideal Roofing. See Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products From Canada: Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty VerDate jul<14>2003 17:49 Jan 04, 2005 Jkt 205001 Administrative Review, 68 FR 70764 (December 19, 2003). On March 30, 2004, the Department published a rescission, in part, of its administrative review with respect to Russell Metals. See Notice of Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products From Canada, 69 FR 16521 (March 30, 2004). On April 29, 2004, the Department extended the deadline for the preliminary results of this antidumping duty administrative review from May 2, 2004, until no later than August 30, 2004. See Notice of Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products From Canada, 69 FR 23495 (April 29, 2004). On August 30, 2004, the Department issued the preliminary results on CORE from Canada. See Certain Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Canada: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 69 FR 555138 (September 13, 2004) (Preliminary Results). Extension of Time Limits for Final Results Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act requires the Department to issue the preliminary results of an administrative review within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of an antidumping duty order for which a review is requested and issue the final results within 120 days after the date on which the preliminary results are published. However, if it is not practicable to complete the review within the time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend these deadlines to a maximum of 365 days and 180 days, respectively. The Department recently received case briefs and rebuttal briefs from the interested parties involved in this administrative review. The Department has determined that it is not practicable to complete the review within the statutory time limit due to the need for analysis of certain complex issues, including the treatment of certain U.S. sales and considering whether the Department should accept certain ‘‘surface type’’ product characteristics reported by Dofasco for purposes of the Department’s model match and cost reporting methodologies. Therefore, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department is extending the time limit for the final results from January 11, 2004, to no later than March 14, 2005, which is the next business day since 180 days from the date of PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 779 publication of the Preliminary Results occurs on a weekend. This notice is issued and published in accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act and section 351.213(h)(2) of the Department’s regulations. Dated: December 28, 2004. Barbara E. Tillman, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/ CVD Operations. [FR Doc. 05–193 Filed 1–4–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–831] Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of China Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: January 5, 2005. SUMMARY: In November 2004, the Department of Commerce received three requests to conduct new shipper reviews of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the People’s Republic of China. We have determined that these requests meet the statutory and regulatory requirements for the initiation of a new shipper review. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sochieta Moth or Brian Ledgerwood at (202) 482–0168 and (202) 482–3836, respectively, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background The notice announcing the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) was published on November 16, 1994. On November 22, 2004, we received a request for a new shipper review from Zhangqui Quingyuan Vegetable Co., Ltd. (Quingyuan). On November 30, 2004, we received requests for new shipper reviews from Shanghai LJ International Trading Co., Ltd. (Shanghai LJ) and Huaiyang Huamei Foodstuff Co., Ltd. (Huamei). Qingyuan and Huamei certified that they both grew and exported the subject merchandise on which they based their requests for a new shipper review. Shanghai LJ certified that it exported the subject merchandise on which it based its request for a new shipper review, but that it did not grow the subject E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM 05JAN1 780 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2005 / Notices merchandise. Specifically, Shanghai LJ certified that Henan Xiancheng Sunny Foodstuff Factory (Sunny Foodstuff) grew the subject merchandise it exported. Initiation of New Shipper Reviews Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i), Huamei, Shanghai LJ, and Qingyuan certified that they did not export subject merchandise to the United States during the period of investigation (POI). In addition, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(ii)(B), Sunny Foodstuff, the grower of the garlic exported by Shanghai LJ, provided a certification that it did not export the subject merchandise to the United States during the POI. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), each of the three exporters, Huamei, Shanghai LJ, and Qingyuan, certified that, since the initiation of the investigation, they have never been affiliated with any exporter or producer who exported the subject merchandise to the United States during the POI, including those not individually examined during the investigation. As required by 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B), each of the abovementioned companies also certified that their export activities were not controlled by the central government. In addition to the certifications described above, the companies submitted documentation establishing the following: (1) The date on which they first shipped the subject merchandise for export to the United States and the date on which the subject merchandise was first entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption; (2) the volume of their first shipment and the volume of subsequent shipments; and (3) the date of their first sale to an unaffiliated customer in the United States. Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.214(d)(1), we are initiating three new shipper reviews for shipments of fresh garlic from the PRC: (1) Grown and exported by Qingyuan, (2) Grown and exported by Huamei, and (3) Grown by Sunny Foodstuffs and exported by Shanghai LJ. The period of review (POR) is November 1, 2003, through October 31, 2004. See 19 CFR 351.214(g)(1)(i)(A). We intend to issue preliminary results of these reviews no later than 180 days from the date of initiation, and final results of these reviews no later than 270 days from the date of initiation. See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act. Because Qingyuan and Huamei have certified that they both grew and VerDate jul<14>2003 17:49 Jan 04, 2005 Jkt 205001 exported the subject merchandise on which they based their request for a new shipper review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to allow, at the option of the importer, the posting of a bond or security in lieu of a cash deposit for each entry of the subject merchandise both grown and exported by these companies until the completion of the new shipper reviews. With respect to Shanghai LJ, it has certified that it exported, but did not grow the subject merchandise on which it based its request for a new shipper review. Therefore, until completion of the new shipper reviews, we will instruct CBP to allow, at the option of the importer, the posting of a bond or security in lieu of a cash deposit for entries of subject merchandise grown by Sunny Foodstuffs and exported by Shanghai LJ. Interested parties that need access to proprietary information in this new shipper review should submit applications for disclosure under administrative protective order in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and 351.306. This initiation and notice are in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214 and 351.221(c)(1)(i). Dated: December 29, 2004. Barbara E. Tillman, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 05–195 Filed 1–4–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Minority Business Development Agency [Docket No: 041229365–4365–01] White House Initiative on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, President’s Advisory Commission on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders Minority Business Development Agency, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of meeting. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA) publishes this notice to announce that the President’s Advisory Commission on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (Commission) will be holding a public meeting to seek testimonies from individuals and organizations on ways to provide equal economic opportunities for full participation of Asian American and Pacific Islander PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 businesses in our free market economy where they may be underserved. DATES: The public meeting will be held on Monday, January 24, 2005, from 8:30 a.m.–5:30 p.m. EST, and Tuesday, January 25, 2004 from 8:30 a.m.–1 p.m. For members of the public who are interested in addressing the Commission, please submit your written requests by January 14, 2005. Requests for special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should be submitted to Mr. Erik Wang (See FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) no later than January 7, 2005. ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held on Monday, January 24, 2005 at: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Green Auditorium, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899. And on Tuesday, January 25, 2005 at: Southeast Asia Resource Action Center, 1628 16th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20009. For members of the public who are interested in addressing the Commission, please submit your request to Mr. Erik Wang, Office of the White House Initiative on AAPIs, Herbert C Hoover Building, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 5092, Washington, DC 20230, or by fax to (202) 219–8809. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information about the Commission or the public meeting, please contact: Mr. Eddy Badrina or Mr. Erik Wang, Office of the White House Initiative on AAPIs, Herbert C Hoover Building, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 5092, Washington, DC 20230, Telephone (202) 482–3949. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463), announcement is made of the Commission’s intent to conduct a public meeting on January 24 and January 25, 2005. Agenda items will include, but will not be limited to: Testimony from community organizations and individuals; testimony from federal agencies; administrative tasks; upcoming events; and comments from the public. The purpose of the Commission is to advise and make recommendations to the President on ways to provide equal economic opportunities for full participation of Asian American and Pacific Islander businesses in our free market economy where they may be underserved and thus, improving the quality of life for approximately 14.5 million Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders living in the United States and the U.S.-associated Pacific Island jurisdictions. E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM 05JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 779-780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-195]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-831]


Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 5, 2005.

SUMMARY: In November 2004, the Department of Commerce received three 
requests to conduct new shipper reviews of the antidumping duty order 
on fresh garlic from the People's Republic of China. We have determined 
that these requests meet the statutory and regulatory requirements for 
the initiation of a new shipper review.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sochieta Moth or Brian Ledgerwood at 
(202) 482-0168 and (202) 482-3836, respectively, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 8, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The notice announcing the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic 
from the People's Republic of China (PRC) was published on November 16, 
1994. On November 22, 2004, we received a request for a new shipper 
review from Zhangqui Quingyuan Vegetable Co., Ltd. (Quingyuan). On 
November 30, 2004, we received requests for new shipper reviews from 
Shanghai LJ International Trading Co., Ltd. (Shanghai LJ) and Huaiyang 
Huamei Foodstuff Co., Ltd. (Huamei).
    Qingyuan and Huamei certified that they both grew and exported the 
subject merchandise on which they based their requests for a new 
shipper review. Shanghai LJ certified that it exported the subject 
merchandise on which it based its request for a new shipper review, but 
that it did not grow the subject

[[Page 780]]

merchandise. Specifically, Shanghai LJ certified that Henan Xiancheng 
Sunny Foodstuff Factory (Sunny Foodstuff) grew the subject merchandise 
it exported.

Initiation of New Shipper Reviews

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i), Huamei, Shanghai LJ, and 
Qingyuan certified that they did not export subject merchandise to the 
United States during the period of investigation (POI). In addition, 
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(ii)(B), Sunny Foodstuff, the grower of 
the garlic exported by Shanghai LJ, provided a certification that it 
did not export the subject merchandise to the United States during the 
POI.
    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), each of the three 
exporters, Huamei, Shanghai LJ, and Qingyuan, certified that, since the 
initiation of the investigation, they have never been affiliated with 
any exporter or producer who exported the subject merchandise to the 
United States during the POI, including those not individually examined 
during the investigation. As required by 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B), 
each of the above-mentioned companies also certified that their export 
activities were not controlled by the central government.
    In addition to the certifications described above, the companies 
submitted documentation establishing the following: (1) The date on 
which they first shipped the subject merchandise for export to the 
United States and the date on which the subject merchandise was first 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption; (2) the volume 
of their first shipment and the volume of subsequent shipments; and (3) 
the date of their first sale to an unaffiliated customer in the United 
States.
    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.214(d)(1), we are initiating three 
new shipper reviews for shipments of fresh garlic from the PRC:
    (1) Grown and exported by Qingyuan,
    (2) Grown and exported by Huamei, and
    (3) Grown by Sunny Foodstuffs and exported by Shanghai LJ.
    The period of review (POR) is November 1, 2003, through October 31, 
2004. See 19 CFR 351.214(g)(1)(i)(A). We intend to issue preliminary 
results of these reviews no later than 180 days from the date of 
initiation, and final results of these reviews no later than 270 days 
from the date of initiation. See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act.
    Because Qingyuan and Huamei have certified that they both grew and 
exported the subject merchandise on which they based their request for 
a new shipper review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) to allow, at the option of the importer, the posting 
of a bond or security in lieu of a cash deposit for each entry of the 
subject merchandise both grown and exported by these companies until 
the completion of the new shipper reviews. With respect to Shanghai LJ, 
it has certified that it exported, but did not grow the subject 
merchandise on which it based its request for a new shipper review. 
Therefore, until completion of the new shipper reviews, we will 
instruct CBP to allow, at the option of the importer, the posting of a 
bond or security in lieu of a cash deposit for entries of subject 
merchandise grown by Sunny Foodstuffs and exported by Shanghai LJ.
    Interested parties that need access to proprietary information in 
this new shipper review should submit applications for disclosure under 
administrative protective order in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and 
351.306.
    This initiation and notice are in accordance with section 
751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214 and 351.221(c)(1)(i).

    Dated: December 29, 2004.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-195 Filed 1-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.