Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China, 779-780 [05-195]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2005 / Notices
Dated: December 29, 2004.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–194 Filed 1–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–122–822
Notice of Extension of Time Limit for
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Certain
Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel Flat
Products from Canada
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 5, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean Carey or Douglas Kirby, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 6, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230,
telephone: (202) 482–3964 and (202)
482–3782, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
The Department published the
antidumping duty order on certain
corrosion–resistant carbon steel flat
products (CORE) from Canada on
August 19, 1993 (58 FR 44162). Based
on timely requests, in accordance with
section 751(a) of the Act, on September
30, 2003, the Department initiated an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on CORE from
Canada, covering the period August 1,
2002, through July 31, 2003. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews, Request for Revocation in Part
and Deferral of Administrative Reviews,
68 FR 56262 (September 30, 2003). This
administrative review was initiated on
the following exporters: Continuous
Colour Coat, Ltd. (‘‘CCC’’), Dofasco Inc.
(‘‘Dofasco’’), Ideal Roofing Company,
Ltd. (‘‘Ideal Roofing’’), Impact Steel
Canada, Ltd. (‘‘Impact Steel’’), Russel
Metals Export (‘‘Russel Metals’’),
Sorevco and Company, Ltd.
(‘‘Sorevco’’), and Stelco Inc. (‘‘Stelco’’).
On December 19, 2003, the Department
published a rescission, in part, of its
administrative review with respect to
CCC, Impact Steel, and Ideal Roofing.
See Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel
Flat Products From Canada: Rescission,
in Part, of Antidumping Duty
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:49 Jan 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
Administrative Review, 68 FR 70764
(December 19, 2003). On March 30,
2004, the Department published a
rescission, in part, of its administrative
review with respect to Russell Metals.
See Notice of Rescission, in Part, of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Corrosion–Resistant Carbon
Steel Flat Products From Canada, 69 FR
16521 (March 30, 2004).
On April 29, 2004, the Department
extended the deadline for the
preliminary results of this antidumping
duty administrative review from May 2,
2004, until no later than August 30,
2004. See Notice of Extension of Time
Limit for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Corrosion–Resistant Carbon
Steel Flat Products From Canada, 69 FR
23495 (April 29, 2004). On August 30,
2004, the Department issued the
preliminary results on CORE from
Canada. See Certain Corrosion–Resistant
Carbon Steel Flat Products from
Canada: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 69 FR 555138 (September 13,
2004) (Preliminary Results).
Extension of Time Limits for Final
Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act
requires the Department to issue the
preliminary results of an administrative
review within 245 days after the last day
of the anniversary month of an
antidumping duty order for which a
review is requested and issue the final
results within 120 days after the date on
which the preliminary results are
published. However, if it is not
practicable to complete the review
within the time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
Department to extend these deadlines to
a maximum of 365 days and 180 days,
respectively.
The Department recently received
case briefs and rebuttal briefs from the
interested parties involved in this
administrative review. The Department
has determined that it is not practicable
to complete the review within the
statutory time limit due to the need for
analysis of certain complex issues,
including the treatment of certain U.S.
sales and considering whether the
Department should accept certain
‘‘surface type’’ product characteristics
reported by Dofasco for purposes of the
Department’s model match and cost
reporting methodologies. Therefore, in
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act, the Department is extending the
time limit for the final results from
January 11, 2004, to no later than March
14, 2005, which is the next business day
since 180 days from the date of
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
779
publication of the Preliminary Results
occurs on a weekend. This notice is
issued and published in accordance
with section 751(a)(1) of the Act and
section 351.213(h)(2) of the
Department’s regulations.
Dated: December 28, 2004.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/
CVD Operations.
[FR Doc. 05–193 Filed 1–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–831]
Fresh Garlic From the People’s
Republic of China
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 5, 2005.
SUMMARY: In November 2004, the
Department of Commerce received three
requests to conduct new shipper
reviews of the antidumping duty order
on fresh garlic from the People’s
Republic of China. We have determined
that these requests meet the statutory
and regulatory requirements for the
initiation of a new shipper review.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sochieta Moth or Brian Ledgerwood at
(202) 482–0168 and (202) 482–3836,
respectively, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 8, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
The notice announcing the
antidumping duty order on fresh garlic
from the People’s Republic of China
(PRC) was published on November 16,
1994. On November 22, 2004, we
received a request for a new shipper
review from Zhangqui Quingyuan
Vegetable Co., Ltd. (Quingyuan). On
November 30, 2004, we received
requests for new shipper reviews from
Shanghai LJ International Trading Co.,
Ltd. (Shanghai LJ) and Huaiyang
Huamei Foodstuff Co., Ltd. (Huamei).
Qingyuan and Huamei certified that
they both grew and exported the subject
merchandise on which they based their
requests for a new shipper review.
Shanghai LJ certified that it exported the
subject merchandise on which it based
its request for a new shipper review, but
that it did not grow the subject
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
780
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2005 / Notices
merchandise. Specifically, Shanghai LJ
certified that Henan Xiancheng Sunny
Foodstuff Factory (Sunny Foodstuff)
grew the subject merchandise it
exported.
Initiation of New Shipper Reviews
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i),
Huamei, Shanghai LJ, and Qingyuan
certified that they did not export subject
merchandise to the United States during
the period of investigation (POI). In
addition, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.214(b)(2)(ii)(B), Sunny Foodstuff,
the grower of the garlic exported by
Shanghai LJ, provided a certification
that it did not export the subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POI.
Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), each of the three
exporters, Huamei, Shanghai LJ, and
Qingyuan, certified that, since the
initiation of the investigation, they have
never been affiliated with any exporter
or producer who exported the subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POI, including those not
individually examined during the
investigation. As required by 19 CFR
351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B), each of the abovementioned companies also certified that
their export activities were not
controlled by the central government.
In addition to the certifications
described above, the companies
submitted documentation establishing
the following: (1) The date on which
they first shipped the subject
merchandise for export to the United
States and the date on which the subject
merchandise was first entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption; (2) the volume of their
first shipment and the volume of
subsequent shipments; and (3) the date
of their first sale to an unaffiliated
customer in the United States.
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
and 19 CFR 351.214(d)(1), we are
initiating three new shipper reviews for
shipments of fresh garlic from the PRC:
(1) Grown and exported by Qingyuan,
(2) Grown and exported by Huamei,
and
(3) Grown by Sunny Foodstuffs and
exported by Shanghai LJ.
The period of review (POR) is
November 1, 2003, through October 31,
2004. See 19 CFR 351.214(g)(1)(i)(A).
We intend to issue preliminary results
of these reviews no later than 180 days
from the date of initiation, and final
results of these reviews no later than
270 days from the date of initiation. See
section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act.
Because Qingyuan and Huamei have
certified that they both grew and
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:49 Jan 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
exported the subject merchandise on
which they based their request for a new
shipper review, we will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
allow, at the option of the importer, the
posting of a bond or security in lieu of
a cash deposit for each entry of the
subject merchandise both grown and
exported by these companies until the
completion of the new shipper reviews.
With respect to Shanghai LJ, it has
certified that it exported, but did not
grow the subject merchandise on which
it based its request for a new shipper
review. Therefore, until completion of
the new shipper reviews, we will
instruct CBP to allow, at the option of
the importer, the posting of a bond or
security in lieu of a cash deposit for
entries of subject merchandise grown by
Sunny Foodstuffs and exported by
Shanghai LJ.
Interested parties that need access to
proprietary information in this new
shipper review should submit
applications for disclosure under
administrative protective order in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and
351.306.
This initiation and notice are in
accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.214 and
351.221(c)(1)(i).
Dated: December 29, 2004.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–195 Filed 1–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Minority Business Development
Agency
[Docket No: 041229365–4365–01]
White House Initiative on Asian
Americans and Pacific Islanders,
President’s Advisory Commission on
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
Minority Business
Development Agency, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Minority Business
Development Agency (MBDA) publishes
this notice to announce that the
President’s Advisory Commission on
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
(Commission) will be holding a public
meeting to seek testimonies from
individuals and organizations on ways
to provide equal economic
opportunities for full participation of
Asian American and Pacific Islander
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
businesses in our free market economy
where they may be underserved.
DATES: The public meeting will be held
on Monday, January 24, 2005, from 8:30
a.m.–5:30 p.m. EST, and Tuesday,
January 25, 2004 from 8:30 a.m.–1 p.m.
For members of the public who are
interested in addressing the
Commission, please submit your written
requests by January 14, 2005. Requests
for special assistance, such as sign
language interpretation or other
reasonable accommodations, should be
submitted to Mr. Erik Wang (See FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) no later
than January 7, 2005.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be
held on Monday, January 24, 2005 at:
National Institute of Standards and
Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Green
Auditorium, Gaithersburg, Maryland
20899. And on Tuesday, January 25,
2005 at: Southeast Asia Resource Action
Center, 1628 16th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20009. For members of
the public who are interested in
addressing the Commission, please
submit your request to Mr. Erik Wang,
Office of the White House Initiative on
AAPIs, Herbert C Hoover Building, 1401
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 5092,
Washington, DC 20230, or by fax to
(202) 219–8809.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information about the
Commission or the public meeting,
please contact: Mr. Eddy Badrina or Mr.
Erik Wang, Office of the White House
Initiative on AAPIs, Herbert C Hoover
Building, 1401 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Room 5092, Washington, DC
20230, Telephone (202) 482–3949.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub.
L. 92–463), announcement is made of
the Commission’s intent to conduct a
public meeting on January 24 and
January 25, 2005. Agenda items will
include, but will not be limited to:
Testimony from community
organizations and individuals;
testimony from federal agencies;
administrative tasks; upcoming events;
and comments from the public.
The purpose of the Commission is to
advise and make recommendations to
the President on ways to provide equal
economic opportunities for full
participation of Asian American and
Pacific Islander businesses in our free
market economy where they may be
underserved and thus, improving the
quality of life for approximately 14.5
million Asian Americans and Pacific
Islanders living in the United States and
the U.S.-associated Pacific Island
jurisdictions.
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 779-780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-195]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-831]
Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 5, 2005.
SUMMARY: In November 2004, the Department of Commerce received three
requests to conduct new shipper reviews of the antidumping duty order
on fresh garlic from the People's Republic of China. We have determined
that these requests meet the statutory and regulatory requirements for
the initiation of a new shipper review.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sochieta Moth or Brian Ledgerwood at
(202) 482-0168 and (202) 482-3836, respectively, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 8, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The notice announcing the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic
from the People's Republic of China (PRC) was published on November 16,
1994. On November 22, 2004, we received a request for a new shipper
review from Zhangqui Quingyuan Vegetable Co., Ltd. (Quingyuan). On
November 30, 2004, we received requests for new shipper reviews from
Shanghai LJ International Trading Co., Ltd. (Shanghai LJ) and Huaiyang
Huamei Foodstuff Co., Ltd. (Huamei).
Qingyuan and Huamei certified that they both grew and exported the
subject merchandise on which they based their requests for a new
shipper review. Shanghai LJ certified that it exported the subject
merchandise on which it based its request for a new shipper review, but
that it did not grow the subject
[[Page 780]]
merchandise. Specifically, Shanghai LJ certified that Henan Xiancheng
Sunny Foodstuff Factory (Sunny Foodstuff) grew the subject merchandise
it exported.
Initiation of New Shipper Reviews
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i), Huamei, Shanghai LJ, and
Qingyuan certified that they did not export subject merchandise to the
United States during the period of investigation (POI). In addition,
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(ii)(B), Sunny Foodstuff, the grower of
the garlic exported by Shanghai LJ, provided a certification that it
did not export the subject merchandise to the United States during the
POI.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), each of the three
exporters, Huamei, Shanghai LJ, and Qingyuan, certified that, since the
initiation of the investigation, they have never been affiliated with
any exporter or producer who exported the subject merchandise to the
United States during the POI, including those not individually examined
during the investigation. As required by 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B),
each of the above-mentioned companies also certified that their export
activities were not controlled by the central government.
In addition to the certifications described above, the companies
submitted documentation establishing the following: (1) The date on
which they first shipped the subject merchandise for export to the
United States and the date on which the subject merchandise was first
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption; (2) the volume
of their first shipment and the volume of subsequent shipments; and (3)
the date of their first sale to an unaffiliated customer in the United
States.
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.214(d)(1), we are initiating three
new shipper reviews for shipments of fresh garlic from the PRC:
(1) Grown and exported by Qingyuan,
(2) Grown and exported by Huamei, and
(3) Grown by Sunny Foodstuffs and exported by Shanghai LJ.
The period of review (POR) is November 1, 2003, through October 31,
2004. See 19 CFR 351.214(g)(1)(i)(A). We intend to issue preliminary
results of these reviews no later than 180 days from the date of
initiation, and final results of these reviews no later than 270 days
from the date of initiation. See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act.
Because Qingyuan and Huamei have certified that they both grew and
exported the subject merchandise on which they based their request for
a new shipper review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to allow, at the option of the importer, the posting
of a bond or security in lieu of a cash deposit for each entry of the
subject merchandise both grown and exported by these companies until
the completion of the new shipper reviews. With respect to Shanghai LJ,
it has certified that it exported, but did not grow the subject
merchandise on which it based its request for a new shipper review.
Therefore, until completion of the new shipper reviews, we will
instruct CBP to allow, at the option of the importer, the posting of a
bond or security in lieu of a cash deposit for entries of subject
merchandise grown by Sunny Foodstuffs and exported by Shanghai LJ.
Interested parties that need access to proprietary information in
this new shipper review should submit applications for disclosure under
administrative protective order in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and
351.306.
This initiation and notice are in accordance with section
751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214 and 351.221(c)(1)(i).
Dated: December 29, 2004.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-195 Filed 1-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P