International Trade Administration June 6, 2008 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents
Results 1 - 7 of 7
Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From Belgium: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel plate in coils (SSPC) from Belgium. For the period May 1, 2006, through April 30, 2007, we have preliminarily determined that U.S. sales have been made below normal value (NV). If these preliminary results are adopted in our final results, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties based on the difference between the constructed export price (CEP) and NV. See ``Preliminary Results of Review'' section of this notice. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From Belgium: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review
The Department of Commerce is conducting an administrative review of the countervailing duty order on stainless steel plate in coils from Belgium for the period January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2006. We preliminarily find that Ugine & ALZ Belgium received countervailable subsidies during the period of review. If these preliminary results are adopted in our final results of this review, we will instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess countervailing duties as detailed in the ``Preliminary Results of Review'' section of this notice. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. See the ``Public Comment'' section of this notice.
Stainless Steel Bar From France: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
On March 31, 2008, the Department of Commerce published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar from France covering the period March 1, 2006, through February 28, 2007. This administrative review covers one manufacturer/exporter, Ascometal S.A. (Ascometal). No interested party commented on the preliminary results. We have made no changes to the margin calculation. Therefore, the final results do not differ from the preliminary results. The final weighted-average dumping margin for the reviewed firm is listed below in the section entitled ``Final Results of Review.''
Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of January 1, 2007 July 31, 2007 Semi-Annual New Shipper Reviews
On August 31, 2007, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') initiated semi-annual new shipper reviews (``NSRs'') of the antidumping duty order on wooden bedroom furniture from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') covering sales of subject merchandise made by Dongguan Mu Si Furniture Co., Ltd. (``Mu Si'') and Dongguan Bon Ten Furniture Co., Ltd. (``Bon Ten''). See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Initiation of New Shipper Reviews, 72 FR 52083 (September 12, 2007) (``Initiation of NSRs''). The Department preliminarily determines that Mu Si has made sales at less than normal value (``NV''), and Bon Ten has not made sales in the United States at less than NV. If these preliminary results are adopted in our final results of review, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') to assess antidumping duties on entries of subject merchandise during the period of review (``POR'') for which the importer-specific assessment rates are above de minimis.
Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges from India; Preliminary Intent to Rescind New Shipper Review
The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting a new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on certain forged stainless steel flanges (stainless steel flanges) from India manufactured by Hotmetal Forge (India) Pvt., Ltd. (Hotmetal). The period of review (POR) is February 1, 2007, through July 31, 2007. We preliminarily determine that Hotmetal had no bona fide U.S. sales during the period of review (POR), and therefore intend to rescind the review. We invite interested parties to comment on this preliminary intent to rescind. Parties who submit argument in these proceedings are requested to submit with the argument: (1) a statement of the issues; and (2) a brief summary of the argument.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
