Environmental Protection Agency July 2010 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Results 151 - 161 of 161
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa
Document Number: 2010-16235
Type: Rule
Date: 2010-07-06
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
The EPA is approving a revision to the Iowa State Implementation Plan (SIP). The purpose of this revision is to update the Polk County Board of Health Rules and Regulations, Chapter V, Air Pollution. These revisions reflect updates to the Iowa statewide rules previously approved by EPA and will ensure consistency between the applicable local agency rules and Federally-approved rules. This rulemaking also ensures Federal enforceability of the applicable parts of the local agency's ``Air Pollution'' rules.
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa
Document Number: 2010-16228
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2010-07-06
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
The EPA proposes to approve a revision to the Iowa State Implementation Plan (SIP). The purpose of this revision is to update the Polk County Board of Health Rules and Regulations, Chapter V, ``Air Pollution.'' These revisions reflect updates to the Iowa statewide rules previously approved by EPA and will ensure consistency between the applicable local agency rules and Federally-approved rules. This rulemaking also ensures Federal enforceability of the applicable parts of the local agency's ``Air Pollution'' rules.
Notice of Meeting of the EPA's Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee (CHPAC)
Document Number: 2010-16177
Type: Notice
Date: 2010-07-02
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the next meeting of the Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee (CHPAC) will be held July 21 and 22, 2010 at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel, 1150 22nd Street, NW., Washington, DC. The CHPAC was created to advise the Environmental Protection Agency on science, regulations, and other issues relating to children's environmental health.
Massachusetts Marine Sanitation Device Standard-Notice of Determination
Document Number: 2010-16174
Type: Notice
Date: 2010-07-02
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
The Regional Administrator of the Environmental Protection AgencyNew England Region, has determined that adequate facilities for the safe and sanitary removal and treatment of sewage from all vessels are reasonably available for the coastal waters of Pleasant Bay/Chatham Harbor, MA.
Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit
Document Number: 2010-16173
Type: Notice
Date: 2010-07-02
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed
Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit
Document Number: 2010-16172
Type: Notice
Date: 2010-07-02
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed
Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability
Document Number: 2010-16171
Type: Notice
Date: 2010-07-02
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Registration Review; Biopesticide Dockets Opened for Review and Comment
Document Number: 2010-16027
Type: Notice
Date: 2010-07-02
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
EPA has established registration review dockets for the pesticides listed in the table in Unit III.A. of this notice. With this document, EPA is opening the public comment period for these registration reviews. Registration review is EPA's periodic review of pesticide registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the statutory standard for registration, that is, the pesticide can perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment. Registration review dockets contain information that will assist the public in understanding the types of information and issues that the Agency may consider during the course of registration reviews. Through this program, EPA is ensuring that each pesticide's registration is based on current scientific and other knowledge, including its effects on human health and the environment.
Carbaryl; Order Denying Washington Toxics Coalition Petition to Revoke Tolerances and Notice of Availability of Denial of Request to Cancel Uses
Document Number: 2010-15751
Type: Rule
Date: 2010-07-02
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
This order denies a petition requesting that EPA revoke all pesticide tolerances for carbaryl under section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). The petition was filed on January 10, 2005 by the Washington Toxics Coalition (WTC). This order also informs the public of the availability of a response to WTC's petition to cancel all uses of carbaryl.
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; California; Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program
Document Number: 2010-16028
Type: Rule
Date: 2010-07-01
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
EPA is approving state implementation plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of California on June 5, 2009 and October 28, 2009 relating to the State's basic and enhanced vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program. The effect of this action is to make the revisions federally enforceable as part of the California SIP.
Public Meeting With Interested Stakeholders for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Electronic Reporting Rule
Document Number: 2010-15885
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2010-07-01
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) gives notice of a meeting to discuss the NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule. With this rulemaking, EPA is utilizing 21st Century modern technologies to improve management and performance of the NPDES program by requiring electronic reporting of NPDES information from regulated facilities. This will reduce the burden for facilities to report to regulatory agencies and for states to report to EPA. Expected benefits include lower processing costs for facilities and states, improved data quality and accuracy, greater data accessibility and transparency for the
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.