Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; California; Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program, 38023-38026 [2010-16028]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 126 / Thursday, July 1, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Event name
Location
Latitude
Whaling Days ........................................
Dyes Inlet ..............................................
Longitude
47°38.65′ N
122°41.35′ W
38023
Radius
300
The following safety zone will be
enforced from 5 p.m. on August 14,
2010 through 1 a.m. on August 15, 2010:
Event name
Location
Medina Days ..........................................
Medina Park ..........................................
The special requirements listed in 33
CFR 165.1332, published on June 15,
2010 in the Federal Register (75 FR
33700), apply to the activation and
enforcement of these safety zones.
All vessel operators who desire to
enter the safety zone must obtain
permission from the Captain of the Port
or Designated Representative by
contacting either the on-scene patrol
craft on VHF Ch 13 or Ch 16 or the
Coast Guard Sector Seattle Joint Harbor
Operations Center (JHOC) via telephone
at 206–217–6002.
The Coast Guard may be assisted by
other Federal, State, or local law
enforcement agencies in enforcing this
regulation.
This notice is issued under authority
of 33 CFR 165.1332 and 33 CFR 165 and
5 U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this
notice, the Coast Guard will provide the
maritime community with extensive
advanced notification of the safety
zones via the Local Notice to Mariners
and marine information broadcasts on
the day of the events. If the COTP or
Designated Representative determines
that the regulated area need not be
enforced for the full duration stated in
this notice, a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners will be issued to grant general
permission to enter the regulated area.
Dated: June 18, 2010.
L.R. Tumbarello,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port, Puget Sound, Acting.
[FR Doc. 2010–15970 Filed 6–30–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0470; FRL–9112–8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
California; Motor Vehicle Inspection
and Maintenance Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Jun 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
ACTION:
Latitude
47° 36.867′ N
Final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is approving state
implementation plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of California on
June 5, 2009 and October 28, 2009
relating to the State’s basic and
enhanced vehicle inspection and
maintenance (I/M) program. The effect
of this action is to make the revisions
federally enforceable as part of the
California SIP.
DATES: This final rule is effective August
2, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under EPA–R09–
OAR–2009–0470. The index to the
docket for this action is available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material) and
some may not be available in either
location [(e.g., confidential business
information (CBI))]. To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Buss, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–
4152, buss.jeffrey@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, the terms
‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’, and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
I. Summary of the Proposed Actions
On August 19, 2009 (74 FR 41818),
EPA proposed to approve a SIP revision
submitted by the California Air
Resources Board (CARB) on June 5,
2009 relating to the State’s basic and
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Longitude
122° 14.5′ W
Radius
150
enhanced vehicle I/M program (‘‘2009
I/M Revision’’) contingent upon the
State’s submittal of revisions to the
enhanced program performance
standard evaluations to address: (1) A
different attainment year for the
Western Mojave Desert 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area, and (2) California’s
base-year program performance for the
six areas subject to the enhanced I/M
program.
More specifically and with the
exception of the enhanced program
performance standard evaluations, we
concluded that the 2009 I/M Revision
met the procedural requirements for
adoption and submittal of SIP revisions,
and the substantive requirements for
I/M programs under the Clean Air Act
(CAA or ‘‘Act’’) and our regulations. In
addition, we concluded that the 2009
I/M Revision would not interfere with
any applicable requirement concerning
attainment of the national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQSs) or any
other applicable requirement of the Act.
In so doing, we took into consideration
changes in EPA’s I/M regulations since
our previous approval of the California
I/M program, changes in the California
I/M programs since our previous
approval, initial area designations for
the 1997 8-hour ozone standards, and
the requirements of the implementation
rules for the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard. For more background on
California’s I/M program, a more
detailed description of the changes in
EPA’s I/M regulations since our
previous approval of the program and of
the 2009 I/M Revision itself, and a more
detailed explanation of our evaluation
of the 2009 I/M Revision and of our
rationale for our proposed action, please
see the August 19, 2009 proposed rule
and related Technical Support
Document.
In our August 19, 2009 proposed rule,
we indicated that our proposed
approval of the 2009 I/M Revision was
contingent upon the State’s submittal of
revisions to the enhanced program
performance standard evaluations to
address certain issues as described
E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM
01JYR1
38024
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 126 / Thursday, July 1, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
above. On October 28, 2009, CARB
submitted revisions to the enhanced
program performance standard
evaluations to address these issues.
On November 18, 2009 (74 FR 59496),
EPA published a Notice of Data
Availability (NODA) and request for
comment on these revisions to the
enhanced program performance
standard evaluations. In that notice we
stated that we had reviewed the
additional modeling information
submitted by CARB on October 28, 2009
and believed that the analyses support
our conclusions that the California
program: (1) Achieved greater percent
emissions reductions (relative to the no
I/M scenario) for volatile organic
compounds (VOC) and oxides of
nitrogen (NOX) in each of the six areas
than the EPA model enhanced I/M
program in 2002, and (2) would achieve
greater percent emissions reductions
(relative to the no I/M scenario) for VOC
and NOX in each of the six areas in the
year before the attainment year than
would the EPA model enhanced I/M
program in 2002. Please see our
November 18, 2009 NODA for a more
detailed discussion of CARB’s October
28, 2009 submittal and our evaluation of
it.
II. EPA’s Response to Comments
Our August 19, 2009 proposed rule
provided for a 30-day comment period,
and our November 18, 2009 NODA
provided for a 14-day comment period.
We did not receive any public
comments in response to the proposed
rule or the NODA.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
III. Final Action
Under section 110(k)(3) of the Clean
Air Act, EPA is approving CARB’s 2009
I/M Revision, as submitted by CARB on
June 5, 2009, and revised by CARB on
October 28, 2009, as a revision to the
California SIP. For the reasons set forth
in this document and in the August 19,
2009 proposed rule, we conclude that
CARB’s I/M SIP revisions meet the
requirements of CAA sections
182(a)(2)(B) and 182(c)(3) in the
geographic areas where the statutory
requirements apply, and applicable EPA
I/M regulations set forth in 40 CFR part
51, subpart S. The updated elements of
the California I/M program that we are
approving include the following:
(1) Discussion of each of the required
design elements of the I/M program;
(2) Description of the current
geographic coverage of the program,
including updated maps and list of
program requirements by zip code;
(3) I/M-related statutes and
regulations;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Jun 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
(4) High enhanced I/M performance
standard evaluations for the urbanized
areas within six California ozone
nonattainment areas (South Coast Air
Basin, San Joaquin Valley, Sacramento
Metro, Coachella Valley, Ventura
County, and Western Mojave Desert), as
meeting the requirements of CAA
section 182(c)(3);
(5) Basic I/M performance standard
evaluation for the urbanized area within
the San Francisco Bay Area ozone
nonattainment area under section
182(a)(2)(B); and
(6) Emission analyzer specifications
and test procedures, including BAR–97
specifications.
Lastly, we are codifying today’s
approval by adding new paragraphs to
40 CFR 52.220 and 40 CFR 52.241, and
we are deleting regulatory language [see
40 CFR 52.241(a)] that codified EPA’s
1997 interim approval of California’s
enhanced I/M program because today’s
final approval of the revised I/M
program makes that language obsolete.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by August 30, 2010.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Air pollution control, Carbon
monoxide, Incorporation by reference,
E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM
01JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 126 / Thursday, July 1, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, and
Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: December 10, 2009.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Editorial Note: This document was
received in the Office of the Federal Register
on June 28, 2010.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
■
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(234)(i)(A)(2) and
(c)(234)(i)(A)(3), and by adding
paragraphs (c)(372) and (c)(373) to read
as follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(234) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(2) Previously approved on January 8,
1997, in paragraph (234)(i)(A)(1)(i) of
this section, and now deleted without
replacement: Health and Safety Code:
Division 26, Part 5, Chapter 5 (Motor
Vehicle Inspection Program), Article 1,
sections 44001.6, 44001.7, 44003.1,
44006; Article 2, sections 44015.3,
44022, 44023; Article 3, section 44031;
Article 8, sections 44081.5, 44082,
44083.
(3) Previously approved on January 8,
1997, in paragraph (234)(i)(A)(1)(iv) of
this section, and now deleted without
replacement: Title 16, California Code of
Regulations, Division 33, Bureau of
Automotive Repair, Article 5.5, Motor
Vehicle Inspection Program, sections
3340.16.6, 3340.42.1.
*
*
*
*
*
(372) The following revisions to the
California Motor Vehicle Inspection and
Maintenance Program were submitted
on June 5, 2009 (2009 I/M Revision), by
the Governor’s Designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) California Air Resources Board.
(1) California Code of Regulations,
Title 16 (Professional and Vocational
Regulations), Division 33 (Bureau of
Automotive Repair), Chapter 1
(Automotive Repair Dealers and Official
Stations and Adjusters), Article 1
(General Provisions), sections 3303.1,
‘‘Public Access to License,
Administrative Action, and Complaint
Information’’ (operative July 20, 2007);
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Jun 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
3303.2, ‘‘Review of Applications for
Licensure, Registration and
Certification; Processing Time’’
(operative July 9, 2003); Article 5.5
(Motor Vehicle Inspection Program),
sections 3340.1, ‘‘Definitions’’ (operative
June 29, 2006); 3340.7, ‘‘Fee for
Inspection at State-Contracted Test-Only
Facility’’ (operative August 17, 1995);
3340.9, ‘‘Repair Assistance Program’’
(operative October 30, 2000); 3340.10,
‘‘Licensing of Smog Check Stations’’
(operative July 26, 1996); 3340.15,
‘‘General Requirements for Smog Check
Stations’’ (operative July 9, 2003);
3340.16, ‘‘Test-Only Station
Requirements’’ (operative August 1,
2007); 3340.16.5, ‘‘Test-and-Repair
Station Requirements’’ (operative June
29, 2006); 3340.17, ‘‘Test Equipment,
Electronic Transmission, Maintenance
and Calibration Requirements’’
(operative June 29, 2006); 3340.18,
‘‘Certification of Emissions Inspection
System Calibration Gases and Blenders
of Gases’’ (operative July 9, 2003);
3340.22.1, ‘‘Smog Check Station Service
Signs’’ (operative February 1, 2001);
3340.22.2, ‘‘Smog Check Station Repair
Cost Limit Sign’’ (operative February 1,
2001); 3340.23, ‘‘Licensed Smog Check
Station That Ceases Operating As a
Licensed Station’’ (operative June 23,
1995); 3340.24, ‘‘Suspension,
Revocation, and Reinstatement of
Licenses’’ (operative June 23, 1995);
3340.28, ‘‘Licenses and Qualifications
for Technicians’’ (operative January 17,
2009); 3340.29, ‘‘Licensing of
Technicians’’ (operative January 17,
2009); 3340.30, ‘‘General Requirements
for Licensed Technicians’’ (operative
June 23, 1995); 3340.31, ‘‘Retraining of
Licensed Technicians’’ (operative June
23, 1995); 3340.32, ‘‘Standards for the
Certification of Institutions Providing
Retraining to Licensed Technicians or
Prerequisite Training to Those Seeking
to Become Licensed Technicians’’
(operative July 9, 2003); 3340.32.1,
‘‘Standards for the Decertification and
Recertification of Institutions Providing
Retraining to Licensed Technicians or
Prerequisite Training to Those Seeking
to Become Licensed Technicians’’
(operative June 23, 1995); 3340.33,
‘‘Standards for the Certification of Basic
and Advanced Instructors Providing
Retraining to Intern, Basic Area, and
Advanced Emission Specialist Licensed
Technicians or Prerequisite Training to
Those Seeking to Become Intern, Basic
Area, or Advanced Emission Specialist
Licensed Technicians’’ (operative
February 1, 2001); 3340.33.1, ‘‘Standards
for the Decertification and
Recertification of Instructors Providing
Retraining to Licensed Technicians or
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38025
Prerequisite Training to Those Seeking
to Become Licensed Technicians’’
(operative June 23, 1995); 3340.35, ‘‘A
Certificate of Compliance,
Noncompliance, Repair Cost Waiver or
an Economic Hardship Extension’’
(operative June 25, 1998); 3340.35.1, ‘‘A
Certificate of Compliance,
Noncompliance, Repair Cost Waiver or
an Economic Hardship Extension Fee
Calculation’’ (operative December 2,
1998); 3340.36, ‘‘Clearing Enforcement
Forms’’ (operative July 26, 1996);
3340.37, ‘‘Installation of Oxides of
Nitrogen (NOx) Devices)’’ (operative July
26, 1996); 3340.41, ‘‘Inspection, Test,
and Repair Requirements’’ (operative
June 29, 2006); 3340.42, ‘‘Mandatory
Smog Check Inspection and Test
Procedures, and Emissions Standards’’
(operative January 11, 2008); 3340.50,
‘‘Fleet Facility Requirements’’ (operative
February 15, 2002); 3340.50.3, ‘‘Fleet
Records and Reporting Requirements’’
(operative June 23, 1995); 3340.50.4,
‘‘Fleet Certificates’’ (operative June 25,
1998); 3340.50.5 ‘‘Suspension or
Rescission of Fleet Facility License’’
(operative June 23, 1995); Article 10
(Gold Shield Program), sections 3392.1,
‘‘Gold Shield Program (GSP)’’ (operative
May 28, 2003); 3392.2, ‘‘Responsibilities
of Smog Check Stations Certified as
Gold Shield’’ (operative August 1, 2007);
3392.3, ‘‘Eligibility for Gold Shield
Certification; Quality Assurance’’
(operative May 28, 2003); 3392.4, ‘‘Gold
Shield Guaranteed Repair (GSGR)
Program Advertising Rights’’ (operative
May 28, 2003); 3392.5, ‘‘Causes for
Invalidation of Gold Shield Station
Certification’’ (operative May 28, 2003);
3392.6, ‘‘Gold Shield Program Hearing
and Determination’’ (operative May 28,
2003); Article 11 (Consumer Assistance
Program), sections 3394.1, ‘‘Purpose and
Components of the Consumer
Assistance Program’’ (operative October
30, 2000); 3394.2, ‘‘Consumer Assistance
Program Administration’’ (operative
October 30, 2000); 3394.3, ‘‘State
Assistance Limits’’ (operative October
30, 2000); 3394.4, ‘‘Eligibility
Requirements’’ (operative August 12,
2008); 3394.5, ‘‘Ineligible Vehicles’’
(operative October 30, 2000); 3394.6,
‘‘Application and Documentation
Requirements’’ (operative July 31, 2006).
(ii) Additional material.
(A) California Air Resources Board.
(1) Executive Order S–09–008, dated
June 9, 2009, adopting the 2009 I/M
Revision.
(2) Non-regulatory portion of the
Revised State Implementation Plan for
California’s Motor Vehicle Inspection &
Maintenance Program (April 7, 2009),
excluding chapter 51.351 (except as it
applies to the San Francisco Bay Area),
E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM
01JYR1
38026
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 126 / Thursday, July 1, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
chapter 51.352, and attachments 4 and
5.
(3) Health and Safety Code (2009):
Division 26, Part 1, Chapter 2, section
39032.5; Part 5, Chapter 5 (Motor
Vehicle Inspection Program), Articles 1–
9.
(4) Business and Professions Code
(2008): Division 3, Chapter 20.3
(Automotive Repair), Article 4, sections
9886, 9886.1, 9886.2, 9886.3, 9886.4.
(5) Vehicle Code (2009): Division 3,
Chapter 1 (Original and Renewal of
Registration; Issuance of Certificates of
Title), Article 1, sections 4000.1, 4000.2,
4000.3, 4000.6.
(373) The following revisions to the
California Motor Vehicle Inspection and
Maintenance Program were submitted
on October 28, 2009, by the Governor’s
Designee.
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) Additional material.
(A) California Air Resources Board.
(1) California I/M Program SIP
Revision—Additional Enhanced I/M
Performance Modeling, Tables of
Results, excluding New Mobile 6 Input
and Output Files and New Registration
Distribution Files.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 52.241 is revised to read as
follows:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
§ 52.241 Inspection and maintenance
program.
(a) [Reserved]
(b) Approval. On June 5, 2009, the
California Air Resources Board
submitted a revision to the California
Motor Vehicle Inspection and
Maintenance Program (2009 I/M
Revision) to satisfy the requirements for
basic and enhanced motor vehicle
inspection and maintenance (I/M) in
applicable ozone nonattainment areas.
On October 28, 2009, the California Air
Resources Board amended the 2009 I/M
Revision to include revised enhanced
performance program evaluations for six
nonattainment areas. Approved
elements of the 2009 I/M Revision, as
amended on October 28, 2009, include
a discussion of each of the required
design elements of the I/M program;
description of the current geographic
coverage of the program; I/M-related
statutes and regulations; enhanced I/M
performance standard evaluations for
the urbanized areas within six
California ozone nonattainment areas
(South Coast Air Basin, San Joaquin
Valley, Sacramento Metro, Coachella
Valley, Ventura County, and Western
Mojave Desert); basic I/M performance
standard evaluation for the urbanized
area within the San Francisco Bay Area
ozone nonattainment area; and emission
analyzer specifications and test
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Jun 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
procedures, including BAR–97
specifications. The 2009 I/M Revision,
as amended on October 28, 2009, meets
the requirements of sections 182(a)(2)(B)
and 182(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act, as
amended in 1990, and 40 CFR part 51,
subpart S and is approved as a revision
to the California State Implementation
Plan.
[FR Doc. 2010–16028 Filed 6–30–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Part 423
[CMS–0023–IFC]
RIN 0938–AP49
Medicare Program; Identification of
Backward Compatible Version of
Adopted Standard for E–Prescribing
and the Medicare Prescription Drug
Program (NCPDP SCRIPT 10.6)
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Interim final rule with comment
period.
SUMMARY: This interim final rule with
comment period identifies the National
Council for the Prescription Drug
Programs (NCPDP) Prescriber/
Pharmacist Interface SCRIPT standard,
Implementation Guide, Version 10,
Release 6 (Version 10.6), hereafter
referred to as ‘‘NCPDP SCRIPT 10.6,’’ as
a backward compatible update of the
adopted NCPDP SCRIPT 8.1. This
interim final rule with comment period
therefore permits the voluntary use of
NCPDP SCRIPT 10.6 for conducting
certain e-prescribing transactions for the
Medicare Part D electronic prescription
drug program.
DATES: Effective date: These regulations
are effective on July 1, 2010. The
incorporation by reference of the
publication listed in these regulations is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of July 1, 2010.
Comment date: To be assured
consideration, comments must be
received at one of the addresses
provided below, no later than 5 p.m.
Eastern Daylight Time (e.d.t.) on August
30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer
to file code CMS–0023–IFC. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (please choose only one of the
ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on this regulation
to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for ‘‘Submitting a
Comment’’.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address ONLY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS–0023–IFC, P.O. Box 8013,
Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments to the
following address only: Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human
Services, Attention: CMS–0023–IFC,
Mail Stop C4–26–05, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–8013.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments before the close
of the comment period to either of the
following addresses:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 445–G, Hubert
H. Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20201.
(Because access to the interior of the
Hubert H. Humphrey Building is not
readily available to persons without
Federal government identification,
commenters are encouraged to leave
their comments in the CMS drop slots
located in the main lobby of the
building. A stamp-in clock is available
for persons wishing to retain a proof of
filing by stamping in and retaining an
extra copy of the comments being filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
If you intend to deliver your
comments to the Baltimore address,
please call telephone number (410) 786–
7195 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Comments mailed to the addresses
indicated as appropriate for hand or
courier delivery may be delayed and
received after the comment period.
Submission of comments on
paperwork requirements. You may
submit comments on this document’s
paperwork requirements by following
the instructions at the end of the
E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM
01JYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 126 (Thursday, July 1, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38023-38026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16028]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0470; FRL-9112-8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
California; Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving state implementation plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of California on June 5, 2009 and October 28,
2009 relating to the State's basic and enhanced vehicle inspection and
maintenance (I/M) program. The effect of this action is to make the
revisions federally enforceable as part of the California SIP.
DATES: This final rule is effective August 2, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under EPA-R09-
OAR-2009-0470. The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may
be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material) and some may not be available in either location [(e.g.,
confidential business information (CBI))]. To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours
with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information the disclosure of which is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Buss, EPA Region IX, (415)
947-4152, buss.jeffrey@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the terms ``we'',
``us'', and ``our'' refer to EPA.
I. Summary of the Proposed Actions
On August 19, 2009 (74 FR 41818), EPA proposed to approve a SIP
revision submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) on June
5, 2009 relating to the State's basic and enhanced vehicle I/M program
(``2009 I/M Revision'') contingent upon the State's submittal of
revisions to the enhanced program performance standard evaluations to
address: (1) A different attainment year for the Western Mojave Desert
8-hour ozone nonattainment area, and (2) California's base-year program
performance for the six areas subject to the enhanced I/M program.
More specifically and with the exception of the enhanced program
performance standard evaluations, we concluded that the 2009 I/M
Revision met the procedural requirements for adoption and submittal of
SIP revisions, and the substantive requirements for I/M programs under
the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act'') and our regulations. In addition, we
concluded that the 2009 I/M Revision would not interfere with any
applicable requirement concerning attainment of the national ambient
air quality standards (NAAQSs) or any other applicable requirement of
the Act. In so doing, we took into consideration changes in EPA's I/M
regulations since our previous approval of the California I/M program,
changes in the California I/M programs since our previous approval,
initial area designations for the 1997 8-hour ozone standards, and the
requirements of the implementation rules for the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard. For more background on California's I/M program, a more
detailed description of the changes in EPA's I/M regulations since our
previous approval of the program and of the 2009 I/M Revision itself,
and a more detailed explanation of our evaluation of the 2009 I/M
Revision and of our rationale for our proposed action, please see the
August 19, 2009 proposed rule and related Technical Support Document.
In our August 19, 2009 proposed rule, we indicated that our
proposed approval of the 2009 I/M Revision was contingent upon the
State's submittal of revisions to the enhanced program performance
standard evaluations to address certain issues as described
[[Page 38024]]
above. On October 28, 2009, CARB submitted revisions to the enhanced
program performance standard evaluations to address these issues.
On November 18, 2009 (74 FR 59496), EPA published a Notice of Data
Availability (NODA) and request for comment on these revisions to the
enhanced program performance standard evaluations. In that notice we
stated that we had reviewed the additional modeling information
submitted by CARB on October 28, 2009 and believed that the analyses
support our conclusions that the California program: (1) Achieved
greater percent emissions reductions (relative to the no I/M scenario)
for volatile organic compounds (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) in each of the six areas than the EPA model enhanced
I/M program in 2002, and (2) would achieve greater percent emissions
reductions (relative to the no I/M scenario) for VOC and NOX
in each of the six areas in the year before the attainment year than
would the EPA model enhanced I/M program in 2002. Please see our
November 18, 2009 NODA for a more detailed discussion of CARB's October
28, 2009 submittal and our evaluation of it.
II. EPA's Response to Comments
Our August 19, 2009 proposed rule provided for a 30-day comment
period, and our November 18, 2009 NODA provided for a 14-day comment
period. We did not receive any public comments in response to the
proposed rule or the NODA.
III. Final Action
Under section 110(k)(3) of the Clean Air Act, EPA is approving
CARB's 2009 I/M Revision, as submitted by CARB on June 5, 2009, and
revised by CARB on October 28, 2009, as a revision to the California
SIP. For the reasons set forth in this document and in the August 19,
2009 proposed rule, we conclude that CARB's I/M SIP revisions meet the
requirements of CAA sections 182(a)(2)(B) and 182(c)(3) in the
geographic areas where the statutory requirements apply, and applicable
EPA I/M regulations set forth in 40 CFR part 51, subpart S. The updated
elements of the California I/M program that we are approving include
the following:
(1) Discussion of each of the required design elements of the I/M
program;
(2) Description of the current geographic coverage of the program,
including updated maps and list of program requirements by zip code;
(3) I/M-related statutes and regulations;
(4) High enhanced I/M performance standard evaluations for the
urbanized areas within six California ozone nonattainment areas (South
Coast Air Basin, San Joaquin Valley, Sacramento Metro, Coachella
Valley, Ventura County, and Western Mojave Desert), as meeting the
requirements of CAA section 182(c)(3);
(5) Basic I/M performance standard evaluation for the urbanized
area within the San Francisco Bay Area ozone nonattainment area under
section 182(a)(2)(B); and
(6) Emission analyzer specifications and test procedures, including
BAR-97 specifications.
Lastly, we are codifying today's approval by adding new paragraphs
to 40 CFR 52.220 and 40 CFR 52.241, and we are deleting regulatory
language [see 40 CFR 52.241(a)] that codified EPA's 1997 interim
approval of California's enhanced I/M program because today's final
approval of the revised I/M program makes that language obsolete.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 30, 2010. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference,
[[Page 38025]]
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, and Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: December 10, 2009.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Editorial Note: This document was received in the Office of the
Federal Register on June 28, 2010.
0
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(234)(i)(A)(2) and
(c)(234)(i)(A)(3), and by adding paragraphs (c)(372) and (c)(373) to
read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(234) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(2) Previously approved on January 8, 1997, in paragraph
(234)(i)(A)(1)(i) of this section, and now deleted without replacement:
Health and Safety Code: Division 26, Part 5, Chapter 5 (Motor Vehicle
Inspection Program), Article 1, sections 44001.6, 44001.7, 44003.1,
44006; Article 2, sections 44015.3, 44022, 44023; Article 3, section
44031; Article 8, sections 44081.5, 44082, 44083.
(3) Previously approved on January 8, 1997, in paragraph
(234)(i)(A)(1)(iv) of this section, and now deleted without
replacement: Title 16, California Code of Regulations, Division 33,
Bureau of Automotive Repair, Article 5.5, Motor Vehicle Inspection
Program, sections 3340.16.6, 3340.42.1.
* * * * *
(372) The following revisions to the California Motor Vehicle
Inspection and Maintenance Program were submitted on June 5, 2009 (2009
I/M Revision), by the Governor's Designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) California Air Resources Board.
(1) California Code of Regulations, Title 16 (Professional and
Vocational Regulations), Division 33 (Bureau of Automotive Repair),
Chapter 1 (Automotive Repair Dealers and Official Stations and
Adjusters), Article 1 (General Provisions), sections 3303.1, ``Public
Access to License, Administrative Action, and Complaint Information''
(operative July 20, 2007); 3303.2, ``Review of Applications for
Licensure, Registration and Certification; Processing Time'' (operative
July 9, 2003); Article 5.5 (Motor Vehicle Inspection Program), sections
3340.1, ``Definitions'' (operative June 29, 2006); 3340.7, ``Fee for
Inspection at State-Contracted Test-Only Facility'' (operative August
17, 1995); 3340.9, ``Repair Assistance Program'' (operative October 30,
2000); 3340.10, ``Licensing of Smog Check Stations'' (operative July
26, 1996); 3340.15, ``General Requirements for Smog Check Stations''
(operative July 9, 2003); 3340.16, ``Test-Only Station Requirements''
(operative August 1, 2007); 3340.16.5, ``Test-and-Repair Station
Requirements'' (operative June 29, 2006); 3340.17, ``Test Equipment,
Electronic Transmission, Maintenance and Calibration Requirements''
(operative June 29, 2006); 3340.18, ``Certification of Emissions
Inspection System Calibration Gases and Blenders of Gases'' (operative
July 9, 2003); 3340.22.1, ``Smog Check Station Service Signs''
(operative February 1, 2001); 3340.22.2, ``Smog Check Station Repair
Cost Limit Sign'' (operative February 1, 2001); 3340.23, ``Licensed
Smog Check Station That Ceases Operating As a Licensed Station''
(operative June 23, 1995); 3340.24, ``Suspension, Revocation, and
Reinstatement of Licenses'' (operative June 23, 1995); 3340.28,
``Licenses and Qualifications for Technicians'' (operative January 17,
2009); 3340.29, ``Licensing of Technicians'' (operative January 17,
2009); 3340.30, ``General Requirements for Licensed Technicians''
(operative June 23, 1995); 3340.31, ``Retraining of Licensed
Technicians'' (operative June 23, 1995); 3340.32, ``Standards for the
Certification of Institutions Providing Retraining to Licensed
Technicians or Prerequisite Training to Those Seeking to Become
Licensed Technicians'' (operative July 9, 2003); 3340.32.1, ``Standards
for the Decertification and Recertification of Institutions Providing
Retraining to Licensed Technicians or Prerequisite Training to Those
Seeking to Become Licensed Technicians'' (operative June 23, 1995);
3340.33, ``Standards for the Certification of Basic and Advanced
Instructors Providing Retraining to Intern, Basic Area, and Advanced
Emission Specialist Licensed Technicians or Prerequisite Training to
Those Seeking to Become Intern, Basic Area, or Advanced Emission
Specialist Licensed Technicians'' (operative February 1, 2001);
3340.33.1, ``Standards for the Decertification and Recertification of
Instructors Providing Retraining to Licensed Technicians or
Prerequisite Training to Those Seeking to Become Licensed Technicians''
(operative June 23, 1995); 3340.35, ``A Certificate of Compliance,
Noncompliance, Repair Cost Waiver or an Economic Hardship Extension''
(operative June 25, 1998); 3340.35.1, ``A Certificate of Compliance,
Noncompliance, Repair Cost Waiver or an Economic Hardship Extension Fee
Calculation'' (operative December 2, 1998); 3340.36, ``Clearing
Enforcement Forms'' (operative July 26, 1996); 3340.37, ``Installation
of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) Devices)'' (operative July 26, 1996);
3340.41, ``Inspection, Test, and Repair Requirements'' (operative June
29, 2006); 3340.42, ``Mandatory Smog Check Inspection and Test
Procedures, and Emissions Standards'' (operative January 11, 2008);
3340.50, ``Fleet Facility Requirements'' (operative February 15, 2002);
3340.50.3, ``Fleet Records and Reporting Requirements'' (operative June
23, 1995); 3340.50.4, ``Fleet Certificates'' (operative June 25, 1998);
3340.50.5 ``Suspension or Rescission of Fleet Facility License''
(operative June 23, 1995); Article 10 (Gold Shield Program), sections
3392.1, ``Gold Shield Program (GSP)'' (operative May 28, 2003); 3392.2,
``Responsibilities of Smog Check Stations Certified as Gold Shield''
(operative August 1, 2007); 3392.3, ``Eligibility for Gold Shield
Certification; Quality Assurance'' (operative May 28, 2003); 3392.4,
``Gold Shield Guaranteed Repair (GSGR) Program Advertising Rights''
(operative May 28, 2003); 3392.5, ``Causes for Invalidation of Gold
Shield Station Certification'' (operative May 28, 2003); 3392.6, ``Gold
Shield Program Hearing and Determination” (operative May 28,
2003); Article 11 (Consumer Assistance Program), sections 3394.1,
``Purpose and Components of the Consumer Assistance Program''
(operative October 30, 2000); 3394.2, ``Consumer Assistance Program
Administration'' (operative October 30, 2000); 3394.3, ``State
Assistance Limits'' (operative October 30, 2000); 3394.4, ``Eligibility
Requirements'' (operative August 12, 2008); 3394.5, ``Ineligible
Vehicles'' (operative October 30, 2000); 3394.6, ``Application and
Documentation Requirements'' (operative July 31, 2006).
(ii) Additional material.
(A) California Air Resources Board.
(1) Executive Order S-09-008, dated June 9, 2009, adopting the 2009
I/M Revision.
(2) Non-regulatory portion of the Revised State Implementation Plan
for California's Motor Vehicle Inspection & Maintenance Program (April
7, 2009), excluding chapter 51.351 (except as it applies to the San
Francisco Bay Area),
[[Page 38026]]
chapter 51.352, and attachments 4 and 5.
(3) Health and Safety Code (2009): Division 26, Part 1, Chapter 2,
section 39032.5; Part 5, Chapter 5 (Motor Vehicle Inspection Program),
Articles 1-9.
(4) Business and Professions Code (2008): Division 3, Chapter 20.3
(Automotive Repair), Article 4, sections 9886, 9886.1, 9886.2, 9886.3,
9886.4.
(5) Vehicle Code (2009): Division 3, Chapter 1 (Original and
Renewal of Registration; Issuance of Certificates of Title), Article 1,
sections 4000.1, 4000.2, 4000.3, 4000.6.
(373) The following revisions to the California Motor Vehicle
Inspection and Maintenance Program were submitted on October 28, 2009,
by the Governor's Designee.
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) Additional material.
(A) California Air Resources Board.
(1) California I/M Program SIP Revision--Additional Enhanced I/M
Performance Modeling, Tables of Results, excluding New Mobile 6 Input
and Output Files and New Registration Distribution Files.
* * * * *
0
3. Section 52.241 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 52.241 Inspection and maintenance program.
(a) [Reserved]
(b) Approval. On June 5, 2009, the California Air Resources Board
submitted a revision to the California Motor Vehicle Inspection and
Maintenance Program (2009 I/M Revision) to satisfy the requirements for
basic and enhanced motor vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) in
applicable ozone nonattainment areas. On October 28, 2009, the
California Air Resources Board amended the 2009 I/M Revision to include
revised enhanced performance program evaluations for six nonattainment
areas. Approved elements of the 2009 I/M Revision, as amended on
October 28, 2009, include a discussion of each of the required design
elements of the I/M program; description of the current geographic
coverage of the program; I/M-related statutes and regulations; enhanced
I/M performance standard evaluations for the urbanized areas within six
California ozone nonattainment areas (South Coast Air Basin, San
Joaquin Valley, Sacramento Metro, Coachella Valley, Ventura County, and
Western Mojave Desert); basic I/M performance standard evaluation for
the urbanized area within the San Francisco Bay Area ozone
nonattainment area; and emission analyzer specifications and test
procedures, including BAR-97 specifications. The 2009 I/M Revision, as
amended on October 28, 2009, meets the requirements of sections
182(a)(2)(B) and 182(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990,
and 40 CFR part 51, subpart S and is approved as a revision to the
California State Implementation Plan.
[FR Doc. 2010-16028 Filed 6-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
