Cattle Fever Tick; Importation Requirements for Ruminants From Mexico, 41652-41656 [2014-16783]

Agencies

• DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
• Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 137 (Thursday, July 17, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41652-41656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16783]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 137 / Thursday, July 17, 2014 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 41652]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

9 CFR Part 93

[Docket No. APHIS-2012-0073]
RIN 0579-AD91


Cattle Fever Tick; Importation Requirements for Ruminants From 
Mexico

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are proposing to recognize the State of Sonora as a region 
in Mexico that is free of fever ticks. We would also establish an 
exemption from acaricide dipping treatment requirements, and the 
documentation requirements associated with such dipping, that are 
currently applicable to cattle and other ruminants originating from 
Sonora as a condition of eligibility for entry to the United States, 
provided that certain conditions are met. This proposed action would 
remove restrictions on the importation of cattle and other ruminants 
from Sonora that we believe are no longer necessary and reduce the 
costs associated with tick dipping for exporters and importers of 
ruminants.

DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before 
September 15, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to: https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2012-0073.
     Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to 
Docket No. APHIS-2012-0073, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, 
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
    Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may 
be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2012-
0073 or in our reading room, which is located in Room 1141 of the USDA 
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington, 
DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you, 
please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Betzaida Lopez, Senior Staff 
Veterinarian, National Import Export Services, VS, APHIS, 4700 River 
Road Unit 39, Riverdale, MD 20737; (301) 851-3300.

SUPPLMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The regulations in 9 CFR part 93 prohibit or restrict the 
importation of certain animals, birds, and poultry into the United 
States to prevent the introduction of communicable diseases of 
livestock and poultry. Subpart D of part 93 (Sec. Sec.  93.400 through 
93.436, referred to below as the regulations) governs the importation 
of ruminants; within subpart D, Sec. Sec.  93.424 through 93.429 
specifically address the importation of various ruminants from Mexico 
into the United States.
    In Sec.  93.426, paragraph (a) provides that all ruminants offered 
for entry into the United States from Mexico must be inspected at a 
port of entry in order to determine whether they are infested with 
fever ticks \1\ or are affected with or have been exposed to a 
communicable disease. Except for ruminants imported under Sec.  
93.427(b)(2), which we discuss below, ruminants found to be infected 
with or exposed to a communicable disease will be refused entry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Currently, Sec.  93.400 defines fever tick as Boophilus 
annulatus. However, for the purposes of this document, fever tick 
means Rhipicephalus annulatus and Rhipicephalus microplus. We 
discuss this at greater length later in this document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 93.427 contains conditions to mitigate the risk of the 
spread of fever ticks, tuberculosis, and brucellosis to U.S. livestock 
via the importation of cattle and other ruminants from Mexico. 
Paragraph (b) specifically addresses fever ticks, with (b)(1) 
containing requirements for ruminants that have not been exposed to any 
communicable disease, including the fever-tick-borne disease bovine 
babesiosis (currently referred to in the regulations as splenetic, 
southern, or tick fever), and (b)(2) containing requirements for 
ruminants that have been exposed to bovine babesiosis or found to be 
infested with or exposed to fever ticks.
    Under paragraph (b)(1), cattle that have not been exposed to bovine 
babesiosis and have not been infested with or exposed to fever ticks 
may be imported into the United States through any port of entry, 
provided that:
     The cattle are accompanied by a certificate showing that 
they were examined by a veterinarian and determined to be free from 
communicable diseases and not to have been exposed to such diseases in 
the 60 days prior to movement to the port of entry;
     The cattle were loaded into cleaned and disinfected cars 
or trucks, if moved by rail or truck; and that, while en route to the 
port of entry, they were not trailed or driven through any area 
infested with fever ticks.
     The cattle are treated at the port of entry with an Animal 
and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)-approved tickicidal dip 
once, under the supervision of an APHIS inspector.
    Under paragraph (b)(2) of Sec.  93.427, cattle that have been 
exposed to bovine babesiosis or that have been infested with or exposed 
to fever ticks, may be imported from Mexico into the United States, 
provided that:
     The cattle were inspected by a veterinarian in Mexico and, 
in the determination of the veterinarian, are free from fever ticks and 
all evidence of communicable diseases, and have not been exposed to 
communicable diseases, other than bovine babesiosis, during the 60 days 
prior to movement to a port of entry into the United States.
     The cattle were treated with an APHIS-approved tickicidal 
dip in Mexico within 7 to 12 days before being offered for entry into 
the United States. (Paragraph (b) of 9 CFR 72.13 lists approved 
tickicidal dips.)
     The cattle are accompanied by a certificate issued in 
accordance with Sec.  93.405 that states that this inspection and 
dipping have occurred. (Section 93.405 of the regulations contains 
conditions for the issuance of such certificates.)
     The cattle are presented for entry into the United States 
at the port of entry at Santa Teresa, NM, or a port of entry within 
Texas that has been approved by APHIS. (APHIS-approved

[[Page 41653]]

ports of entry within Texas are listed in Sec.  93.403(c).)
     The importer, or his or her agent, executes and delivers 
to the inspector at the port of entry an application for inspection and 
supervised dipping. In this application, the importer, or his or her 
agent, agrees to waive all claims against the United States for any 
loss or damage to the cattle occasioned by or resulting from this 
dipping, or resulting from the fact that they are later found to still 
be infested with ticks, and to any loss or damage to cattle that come 
in contact with these cattle.
     When offered for entry, the cattle receive an inspection 
by an inspector. If free from fever ticks, the cattle are treated once 
with an APHIS-approved tickicidal dip 7 to 14 days after the dipping in 
Mexico referred to above. If found to be infested with fever ticks, 
then the cattle are refused entry and may not be inspected again at a 
port of entry until they are again dipped and 10 to 14 days have 
elapsed.
     The cattle are not imported into an area of Texas 
quarantined for bovine babesiosis, or for tick infestation. 
(Information regarding such quarantined areas is found in 9 CFR 72.5.)
    The Mexican State of Sonora has submitted requests to be evaluated 
for their fever tick status in accordance with our process for 
evaluating a foreign region's animal health status, which is described 
in Sec.  92.2.
    In response to these requests, we have prepared a risk assessment 
that evaluates the fever tick status of Sonora.\2\ Based on that 
assessment, we have reason to believe that cattle that are born and 
produced in Sonora, have neither been exposed to nor infested with 
fever ticks, and have, accordingly, not been exposed to bovine 
babesiosis present a low likelihood of exposing U.S. livestock to fever 
ticks via importation into the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The assessment is available on the Regulations.gov Web site 
(see ADRESSES above) or by contacting the person listed in this 
document under the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We are, therefore, proposing to recognize Sonora as free of fever 
ticks and to establish an exemption for cattle imported into the United 
States from Sonora from the acaricide dipping treatment requirements, 
and the documentation requirements associated with such dipping, that 
are currently applicable to cattle or other ruminants imported from all 
regions of Mexico, provided that certain conditions are met. Those 
conditions are discussed in greater detail below. This proposed action 
would remove restrictions on the importation of cattle and other 
ruminants from Sonora that we believe are no longer necessary and would 
reduce the costs associated with tick dipping for exporters and 
importers.

Cattle From Regions of Mexico That APHIS Has Determined To Be Free From 
Fever Ticks

    As noted above, current Sec.  93.427(b)(1) contains import 
requirements for cattle from Mexico that have not been exposed to 
bovine babesiosis, while paragraph (b)(2) contains requirements for 
those that have. This proposed rule, in addition to making substantive 
changes to the regulations, such as exempting cattle from tick-free 
regions from acaricide dipping, would reorganize paragraph (b), placing 
the requirements for cattle from such regions in paragraph (b)(1) and 
those for the remainder of Mexico in (b)(2).
    The introductory text of proposed paragraph (b)(1) would state that 
APHIS has evaluated certain regions of Mexico in accordance with Sec.  
92.2 and determined that they are free from fever ticks; a list of all 
such regions would be found on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/wps/portal/aphis/ourfocus/importexport. Copies of 
the list would also be available by contacting APHIS at the postal 
address that would be listed in the regulations. The paragraph would 
further note that regions could be removed from the list based on a 
determination by APHIS that fever ticks exist in the region, on the 
discovery of tick-infested cattle from that region at a port of entry 
into the United States, or on information provided by a representative 
of the government of that region that fever ticks exist in the region.
    Proposed (b)(1)(i) would state that cattle imported from regions of 
Mexico that APHIS has determined to be free from fever ticks would have 
to be accompanied by a certificate issued in accordance with Sec.  
93.405 that states that the cattle originate from such a region of 
Mexico. This requirement would provide us with written documentation 
from a competent Mexican veterinary authority regarding the origin of 
the cattle and would facilitate traceback in the unlikely event that 
any cattle from a tick-free region of Mexico are determined to be 
infested with fever ticks during an inspection at a port of entry on 
the Mexican border.
    Proposed paragraph (b)(1)(ii) would state that if the cattle will 
transit through an area of Mexico that we have not determined to be 
free from fever ticks, they would have to be moved in a sealed means of 
conveyance. This proposed requirement would prevent the commingling of 
cattle from tick-free regions with cattle that are not from such 
regions during transit through Mexico prior to export to the United 
States.
    Proposed paragraph (b)(1)(iii) would state that the cattle must be 
presented for entry into the United States at a port of entry listed in 
Sec.  93.403(c). This paragraph represents an editorial rather than a 
substantive change, since cattle from Mexico that have not been exposed 
to bovine babesiosis are already subject to the general requirement in 
Sec.  93.426 that ruminants from Mexico must be imported through ports 
designated in Sec.  93.403. The port-of-entry requirement is intended 
to ensure that ruminants imported from Mexico enter the United States 
through land border ports with adequate inspection and quarantine 
facilities.
    Proposed paragraph (b)(1)(iv) would state that the cattle must be 
segregated at the U.S. port of entry from cattle from regions of Mexico 
that have not been determined to be free of fever ticks. This proposed 
requirement would prevent cattle from tick-free regions from 
commingling at the port of entry with cattle that may have been exposed 
to bovine babesiosis.
    Proposed paragraph (b)(1)(v) would state that the importer, or his 
or her agent, would have to execute and deliver to the inspector at the 
port of entry an application for inspection or supervised dipping. In 
this application, the importer, or his or her agent, would have to 
agree to waive all claims against the United States for any loss or 
damage to the cattle occasioned by or resulting from inspection or 
dipping or from the fact that the cattle are later found still to be 
tick infested and for any loss or damage to any other cattle in the 
importer's possession or control that come in contact with the dipped 
cattle. This paragraph is largely incorporated, with minor editorial 
changes, from Sec.  93.427(b)(2)(iii) of the existing regulations, 
differing substantively in that the proposed rule would allow the 
importer to apply either for inspection or supervised dipping, rather 
than requiring him or her to apply for both, as the regulations do now.
    Proposed paragraph (b)(1)(vi) would state that the cattle must 
either be inspected by an APHIS inspector at the port of entry for 
evidence of tick infestation, or be treated with an APHIS-approved 
tickicidal dip under the supervision of an inspector at the port of 
entry.
    As noted above, the existing regulations require that all cattle 
from Mexico must, among other things, undergo a tick dip under the 
supervision of an APHIS inspector at

[[Page 41654]]

the U.S. port of entry. As we have also noted, however, under this 
proposed rule, cattle from tick-free regions of Mexico would no longer 
be required to undergo a tick dip. We believe that, in lieu of a dip, 
an inspection at the port of entry is an adequate risk-mitigation 
measure because the exclusion and dipping requirements currently in 
place in Sonora are functionally equivalent to ours. We would, 
therefore, allow the exporter to choose between having the cattle 
inspected by an APHIS inspector at the port of entry or having the 
cattle undergo a tick dip there. Choosing the inspection option would 
allow the exporter to avoid the cost of the tick dip. Some exporters 
may still opt for the dip instead, however, because the dipping process 
is generally less time-consuming than the inspection process.
    Finally, proposed paragraph (b)(1)(vii) would state that if any 
cattle in a shipment are determined, upon inspection at the port of 
entry, to be infested with fever ticks, the entire lot would be refused 
entry and, subsequently, could only be imported into the United States 
after meeting the conditions for the importation of cattle from regions 
of Mexico that APHIS has not determined to be free from fever ticks. As 
noted above, the finding of tick-infested cattle at the port of entry 
could result in the loss of the exporting region's tick-free status.

Cattle From Regions of Mexico That APHIS Has Not Determined To Be Free 
From Fever Ticks

    Because of the possibility that cattle imported from regions of 
Mexico that are not free of fever ticks have been exposed to bovine 
babesiosis, such imports would be allowed only under the conditions 
currently applicable to exposed cattle, which are contained in 
paragraph (b)(2) of Sec.  93.427. In our proposed paragraph (b)(2), we 
would make some editorial revisions to make the regulations clearer and 
easier to read and would also make one substantive change, which we 
discuss below.
    The provisions contained in proposed paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through 
(b)(2)(v), which would be incorporated from the existing regulations, 
with the substantive change referred to above, would state that:
     The cattle would have to be inspeced by a veterinarian in 
Mexico and determined to be free from fever ticks and all evidence of 
communicable diseases and not to have been exposed to communicable 
diseases, other gthan bovine babesiosis, during the 60 days prior to 
movement to a port of entry into the United States.
     The cattle would have to be treated in Mexico with a 
tickicidal dip that is listed in Sec.  72.13 within 7 to 14 days (the 
existing regulations list the range as 7 to 12 days) before being 
offered for entry into the United States.
     The cattle would have to be accompanied by a certificate 
issued in accordance with Sec.  93.405 that states that this inspection 
and dipping have occurred.
     The cattle would have to be presented for entry into the 
United States at the port of entry at Santa Teresa, NM, or a port of 
entry within Texas that is listed in Sec.  93.403(c).
     The importer, or his or her agent, would have to execute 
and deliver to the inspector at the port of entry an application for 
inspection and supervised dipping. In this application, the importer, 
or his or her agent, would agree to waive all claims against the United 
States for any loss or damage to the cattle occasioned by or resulting 
from this dipping or from the fact that the cattle are later found 
still to be infested with ticks and for any loss or damage to any other 
cattle in the importer's possession or control that come in contact 
with the dipped cattle.
    Proposed paragraph (b)(2)(vi) contains port-of-entry inspection and 
dipping requirements. When offered for entry, the cattle would have to 
receive an inspection by an inspector. If found to be free from fever 
ticks, the cattle would have to be treated once at the port with a 
tickicidal dip listed in Sec.  72.13. That dip would have to take place 
within 7 to 14 days after the required dipping in Mexico. If found to 
be infested with fever ticks, the cattle would be refused entry and 
could not be inspected again at a port of entry until they are dipped a 
second time and 7 to 14 days have elapsed following the second dipping. 
Under the current regulations, the required interval before an 
inspection could take place following the second dipping at the port is 
10 to 14 days. We have found operationally, however, that when cattle 
become infested with fever ticks, ticks will emerge and present 
evidence of infestation in as few as 7 days. Throughout paragraph 
(b)(2), we would standardize the intervals between dips or between dips 
and inspections at 7 to 14 days. That proposed interval is adequate to 
determine whether the tickicidal treatment has been effective.
    Finally, proposed paragraph (b)(2)(vii) would state that the cattle 
must not be imported into an area of Texas that is quarantined in 
accordance with Sec.  72.5 for bovine babesiosis, or for tick 
infestation. This provision, like most of the others in proposed Sec.  
93.427(b)(2), is incorporated from the existing regulations.

Miscellaneous Amendments

    As we mentioned previously in footnote 1 of this document, Sec.  
93.400 of the regulations currently defines fever tick as Boophilus 
annulatus. However, the genus Boophilus has been reclassified as a 
subgenus of the genus Rhipicephalus. A final rule published in the 
Federal Register on February 7, 2013 (78 FR 8960-8961, Docket No. 
APHIS-2012-0069) updated our domestic bovine babesiosis regulations in 
9 CFR 72.1 to reflect this reclassification. Similarly, for the 
purposes of import requirements for ruminants from regions of North 
America, we operationally consider fever tick to refer to Rhipicephalus 
annulatus and Rhipicephalus microplus. We are proposing to amend the 
definition of fever tick to reflect this operational understanding.
    The amended definition would also provide that fever tick would 
include any other species of tick determined by the Administrator to be 
a vector of bovine babesiosis and specified on the Internet at the Web 
address provided in the regulations. This would provide the regulations 
with needed flexibility in the event that additional tick vectors of 
bovine babesiosis are discovered in North America.
    Additionally, while the regulations currently refer to the disease 
borne by fever ticks as splenetic, southern, or tick fever, the 
international taxonomic community favors the term bovine babesiosis. 
Accordingly, we would remove references to splenetic, southern, and 
tick fever from the regulations and replace them with the term bovine 
babesiosis.

Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act

    This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for 
the purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been 
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 603, we have performed an initial 
regulatory flexibility analysis, which is summarized below, regarding 
the economic effects of this proposed rule on small entities. Copies of 
the full analysis are available by contacting the person listed under 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or on the Regulations.gov Web site (see 
ADDRESSES above for instructions for accessing Regulations.gov).
    We are proposing to recognize the Mexican State of Sonora as a 
region that is free of fever ticks. Further, while the

[[Page 41655]]

existing fever tick regulations require both inspection and supervised 
acaricide dipping at the port of entry for all cattle from Mexico, 
under this proposed rule, importers of cattle from Sonora would have to 
submit an application either for inspection or dipping, but not both.
    From 2009 to 2012, 1.26 million cattle were imported yearly from 
Mexico into the United States. About one-fourth came from Sonora. 
Cattle imported into the United States from Mexico are generally 
purchased by stocker operations that background the cattle on pasture 
before they are shipped to feedlots. Most of these entities are small 
according to the Small Business Administration standard for cattle 
producers.
    The average unit price of cattle imported from Mexico from 2009 to 
2012 was about $440. The average cost of dipping with acaricide is 
$3.50 to $10.00 per head. It takes approximately 5 seconds for 3 cattle 
to cross a dipping vat. For an average 500-head herd, dipping takes 
about 15 minutes. To inspect a 500-head herd takes from 4 to 12 hours. 
Depending on the size of the herd and time needed for inspection, some 
importers may choose to have the cattle dipped rather than inspected. 
The estimated cost of dipping is equivalent to about 1 to 2 percent of 
the value of the imported cattle. Any resulting cost savings realized 
by U.S. cattle importers due to inspection rather than dipping of 
cattle would depend on the relative price responsiveness of the sellers 
and buyers of the cattle. APHIS does not expect the rule to result in 
an increase of any consequence in the number of cattle imported from 
Mexico.
    Based on the information we have, there is no reason to conclude 
that adoption of this proposed rule would result in any significant 
economic effect on a substantial number of small entities. However, we 
do not currently have all of the data necessary for a comprehensive 
analysis of the effects of this proposed rule on small entities. 
Therefore, we are inviting comments on potential effects. In 
particular, we are interested in determining the number and kind of 
small entities that may incur benefits or costs from the implementation 
of this proposed rule.

Executive Order 12988

    This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, 
Civil Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is adopted: (1) All State 
and local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule 
will be preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will be given to this 
rule; and (3) administrative proceedings will not be required before 
parties may file suit in court challenging the rule.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    In accordance with section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information collection or 
recordkeeping requirements included in this proposed rule have been 
submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 
Please send written comments to the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for APHIS, Washington, 
DC 20503. Please state that your comments refer to Docket No. APHIS-
2012-0073. Please send a copy of your comments to: (1) Docket No. 
APHIS-2012-0073, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, 
Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238, 
and (2) Clearance Officer, OCIO, USDA, Room 404-W, 14th Street and 
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250. A comment to OMB is best 
assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of 
publication of this proposed rule.
    APHIS is proposing to recognize the State of Sonora as a region in 
Mexico that is free of fever ticks. We would also establish an 
exemption from acaricide dipping treatment requirements, and the 
documentation requirements associated with such dipping, that are 
currently applicable to cattle and other ruminants originating from 
Sonora as a condition of eligibility for entry to the United States, 
provided that certain conditions are met. The documentation 
requirements for the importation of these cattle are currently covered 
under OMB control numbers 0579-0224 and 0579-0040. However, the 
application of seals to conveyances will be a new information 
collection activity.
    We are soliciting comments from the public (as well as affected 
agencies) concerning our proposed information collection and 
recordkeeping requirements. These comments will help us:
    (1) Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of our agency's functions, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    (2) Evaluate the accuracy of our estimate of the burden of the 
proposed information collection, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used;
    (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to 
be collected; and
    (4) Minimize the burden of the information collection on those who 
are to respond (such as through the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology; e.g., permitting electronic 
submission of responses).
    Estimate of burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of 
information is estimated to average 1 hour per response.
    Respondents: Veterinarians of Mexico and foreign Federal 
governments.
    Estimated annual number of respondents: 1.
    Estimated annual number of responses per respondent: 1.
    Estimated annual number of responses: 1.
    Estimated total annual burden on respondents: 1 hour. (Due to 
averaging, the total annual burden hours may not equal the product of 
the annual number of responses multiplied by the reporting burden per 
response.)
    Copies of this information collection can be obtained from Mrs. 
Celeste Sickles, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 
851-2908.

E-Government Act Compliance

    The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to 
compliance with the E-Government Act to promote the use of the Internet 
and other information technologies, to provide increased opportunities 
for citizen access to Government information and services, and for 
other purposes. For information pertinent to E-Government Act 
compliance related to this proposed rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste 
Sickles, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851-2908.

List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 93

    Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock, Poultry and poultry products, 
Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Accordingly, we propose to amend 9 CFR part 93 as follows:

PART 93--IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN ANIMALS, BIRDS, FISH, AND POULTRY, 
AND CERTAIN ANIMAL, BIRD, AND POULTRY PRODUCTS; REQUIREMENTS FOR 
MEANS OF CONVEYANCE AND SHIPPING CONTAINERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 93 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622 and 8301-8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 
31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.

0
2. In Sec.  93.400, the definition of fever tick is revised to read as 
follows:


Sec.  93.400  Definitions.

* * * * *

[[Page 41656]]

    Fever tick. Rhipicephalus annulatus, Rhipicephalus microplus, and 
any other species of tick determined by the Administrator to be a 
vector of bovine babesiosis and specified on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/wps/portal/aphis/ourfocus/importexport.
* * * * *


Sec.  93.423  [Amended]

0
3. In Sec.  93.423, paragraph (c) is amended by removing the words 
``splenetic, southern, or tick fever'' and adding the words ``bovine 
babesiosis'' in their place.
0
4. In Sec.  93.427, paragraph (b) is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  93.427  Cattle and other bovines from Mexico.

* * * * *
    (b)(1) Cattle from regions of Mexico that APHIS has determined to 
be free from fever ticks. APHIS has evaluated certain regions of Mexico 
in accordance with Sec.  92.2 of this chapter, and determined that they 
are free from fever ticks; a list of all such regions is found on the 
Internet https://www.aphis.usda.gov/wps/portal/aphis/ourfocus/importexport. Copies of the list are also available by contacting APHIS 
at the following address: Regionalization Evaluation Services, National 
Import Export Services, Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health 
Inspection Service, 4700 River Road Unit 38, Riverdale, MD 20737. 
Regions may be removed from the list based on a determination by APHIS 
that fever ticks exist in the region, on the discovery of tick-infested 
cattle from the region at a port of entry into the United States, or on 
information provided by a representative of the government of that 
region that fever ticks exist in the region. Cattle from regions of 
Mexico that APHIS has determined to be free from fever ticks may be 
imported into the United States subject to the following conditions:
    (i) The cattle are accompanied by a certificate issued in 
accordance with Sec.  93.405 that states that the cattle originate from 
a region of Mexico that APHIS has determined to be free from fever 
ticks.
    (ii) If the cattle will transit to the United States through an 
area of Mexico that APHIS has not determined to be free from fever 
ticks, they are moved in a sealed means of conveyance, and that seal 
remains intact throughout such transit.
    (iii) The cattle are presented for entry into the United States at 
a land border port of entry listed in Sec.  93.403(c).
    (iv) The cattle are segregated at the U.S. port of entry from 
cattle from regions of Mexico that APHIS has not determined to be free 
from fever ticks.
    (v) The importer, or his or her agent, executes and delivers to the 
inspector at the port of entry an application for inspection or 
supervised dipping. In this application, the importer, or his or her 
agent, waive all claims against the United States for any loss or 
damage to the cattle occasioned by or resulting from inspection or 
dipping or from the fact that the cattle are later found still to be 
tick infested, and for any loss or damage to any other cattle in the 
importer's possession or control that come in contact with the dipped 
cattle.
    (vi) The cattle are either inspected by an APHIS inspector at the 
port of entry for evidence of tick infestation or are treated with a 
tickicidal dip that is listed in Sec.  72.13 of this chapter under the 
supervision of an inspector at the port of entry.
    (vii) If any cattle are determined to be infested with fever ticks, 
the lot of cattle is refused entry and may only be imported into the 
United States subject to the requirements in paragraph (b)(2) of this 
section.
    (2) Cattle from regions of Mexico that APHIS has not determined to 
be free from fever ticks. Cattle from regions of Mexico that APHIS has 
not determined to be free from fever ticks may only be imported into 
the United States subject to the following conditions:
    (i) The cattle have been inspected by a veterinarian in Mexico and, 
in the determination of the veterinarian, are free from fever ticks and 
all evidence of communicable diseases, and have not been exposed to 
communicable diseases, other than bovine babesiosis, during the 60 days 
prior to movement to a port of entry into the United States.
    (ii) The cattle have been treated in Mexico with a tickicidal dip 
that is listed in Sec.  72.13 of this chapter within 7 to 14 days 
before being offered for entry into the United States.
    (iii) The cattle are accompanied by a certificate issued in 
accordance with Sec.  93.405 that states that this inspection and 
dipping have occurred.
    (iv) The cattle are presented for entry into the United States at 
the port of entry at Santa Teresa, NM, or a port of entry within Texas 
that is listed in Sec.  93.403(c).
    (v) The importer, or his or her agent, executes and delivers to the 
inspector at the port of entry an application for inspection and 
supervised dipping. In this application, the importer, or his or her 
agent, agrees to waive all claims against the United States for any 
loss or damage to the cattle occasioned by or resulting from this 
dipping or from the fact that the cattle are later found to still be 
infested with ticks, and for any loss or damage to any other cattle in 
the importer's possession or control that come in contact with the 
dipped cattle.
    (vi) When offered for entry, the cattle receive an inspection by an 
inspector. If free from fever ticks, the cattle are treated once with a 
tickicidal dip that is listed in Sec.  72.13 of this chapter 7 to 14 
days after the dipping required in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this 
section. If found to be infested with fever ticks, the cattle are 
refused entry and may not be inspected again at a port of entry until 
they are again dipped and 7 to 14 days have elapsed.
    (vii) The cattle are not imported into an area of Texas that is 
quarantined in accordance with Sec.  72.5 of this chapter for bovine 
babesiosis, or for tick infestation.
* * * * *

    Done in Washington, DC, this 11th day of July 2014.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-16783 Filed 7-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P