(c) Terms and conditions of permits. All
issued permits will contain, as a minimum, authorization for discharge subject
to the conditions of the permit, effluent limitations, standards of performance
for any new source, standard conditions, special conditions (when applicable),
monitoring requirements where discharge is allowed, and reporting requirements
that comply with these regulations.
The permittee shall comply with effluent standards or
prohibitions established under section 307(a) of the CWA for toxic pollutants
within the time provided in the regulations that establish these standards or
prohibitions.
(i) Standard conditions.
All issued permits shall contain standard conditions consisting of, but not
limited to, the following:
(A) The permittee
must comply with all conditions of the permit. Any noncompliance is a violation
of the CWA and the Wyoming Environmental Quality Act and is grounds for
enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or
modification; or denial of a permit reissuance or extension of
authorization.
(B) Any planned
sewerage system, treatment works, or disposal system expansions, production
increases, process modifications, or new source additions which will result in
a new or increased discharge or the inclusion of additional criteria for a new
source shall be reported by submission of an application or, if such discharge
will not violate effluent limitations specified in the permit, by submission to
the administrator of notification of such new or increased discharge.
(C) The discharge of pollution and/or wastes
into surface waters of the state more frequently than, or at a level in excess
of, that identified and authorized by a permit shall constitute a violation of
the conditions of the permit.
(D)
After notice and opportunity for a hearing, a permit may be modified, in whole
or in part, revoked and reissued, or terminated during its term. The filing of
a request by the permittee for a modification, revocation, reissuance,
termination, or notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance
does not halt any permit condition. Cause for such permit actions,
include, but are not limited to, any of
the following:
(I) Violation of any
conditions of the permit;
(II)
Obtaining a permit by misrepresentations or failure to fully disclose all
relevant facts;
(III) A change in
any condition that requires either a temporary or permanent reduction or
elimination of the discharge; and
(IV) A failure or refusal by the permittee to
comply with the monitoring and reporting requirements of a permit and
Sections
35-11-109(a) (iv) and
35-11-110(a)
(vii) Wyoming Statutes.
(E) A permit may be modified in whole or in
part during its term in order to apply any more stringent toxic effluent
standard or prohibition, for a toxic substance present in the permittee's
discharge, that is promulgated by the Administrator of the EPA.
(F) A requirement that the permittee allow
the administrator or his authorized representative upon presentation of his
credentials to:
(I) Enter the premises where
a permittee's regulated facility or activity is located or conducted or where
records must be kept under the conditions of the permit;
(II) Sample or monitor at reasonable times,
for the purposes of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise authorized by
these rules, the Wyoming Environmental Quality Act or the CWA, any substances
or parameters at any location;
(III) Have access to and copy, at reasonable
times, any records required by the permit to be kept;
(IV) Inspect at reasonable times any
facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices,
or operations regulated or required under the permit; and
(V) Take any other action authorized by
35-11-109(a) (v), (vi) and
(vii) Wyoming Statutes, or these
regulations.
(G) A
requirement that, if requested by the administrator or the administrator's
authorized agent, the permittee shall provide access to physical locations
associated with this permit including, but not limited to, well heads,
discharge points, reservoirs, monitoring locations, and any waters of the state
associated with the permit at the point of discharge.
(H) A requirement that, if the permittee
wishes to continue an activity regulated by a permit after the expiration date
of the perit, the permittee must apply for and obtain a new permit in
accordance with Section 10 of these regulations, unless an extension is granted
under Section 11 of these regulations.
(I) It is not a defense for a permittee in an
enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the
permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of a
permit.
(J) The permittee shall
take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of
this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human
health or the environment.
(K) The
permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive
privilege.
(L) A requirement that
the permittee shall furnish to the administrator, within a reasonable time, any
information which the administrator or his authorized representative may
request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and
reissuing, or terminating the permit or to determine compliance with the
permit.
(M) A requirement that the
permittee shall furnish to the administrator or his authorized representative,
copies of records required to be kept by the permit.
(N) The permittee must properly operate and
maintain all equipment and treatment systems used by the permittee to achieve
compliance with the terms of the permit. The permittee must provide appropriate
laboratory controls and quality assurance procedures, where applicable. Backup
systems are required when needed to ensure compliance. However, each main line
unit treatment process must be operated as a minimum.
(O) To assure compliance with permit
limitations, the permittee shall monitor:
(I)
The mass (or other measurement specified in the permit) for each pollutant
limited in the permit.
(II) The
volume of effluent discharged from each outfall.
(P) Samples and measurements taken for the
purpose of monitoring shall be representative of the monitored activity.
Records must be retained for three (3) years subject to extension by the
director. Monitoring records shall include but are not limited to the
following:
(I) The date, location, and time
of the sampling;
(II) The dates and
by whom analyses were performed;
(III) Analytical techniques used;
(IV) The results of such analyses;
(V) Name of the person collecting the
sample(s);
(VI) Sampling handling
and preservation conducted; and
(VII) Detection limits for analyses
conducted.
Wastewater measurements must be conducted in accordance with
methods and procedures prescribed in 40 CFR Part 136 or other specified
procedures.
(Q)
Pollutants for which the permittee must report violations of daily maximum
discharge limitations under Section
5(c) (i)
(W) (24-hour reporting) shall be listed in
the permit. This list shall include any toxic pollutant or hazardous substance,
or any pollutant specifically identified as the method to monitor a toxic
pollutant or hazardous substance.
(R) Applications, reports, or information
submitted to the administrator must be signed and certified. Knowingly making
false statements, representations, or certifications is a violation of the
permit, Wyoming Water Quality Rules and Regulations Chapter 2 and the Wyoming
Environmental Quality Act and is subject to enforcement.
(S) The permittee shall give advance
notification to the administrator of any planned changes in the permitted
facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit
requirements.
(T) The permit is not
transferrable except after written notification is provided to the
administrator and such request is approved by the administrator. The
administrator may require modification, or revocation and reissuance, as
necessary.
(U) Monitoring reports
must be submitted on a discharge monitoring report form provided by the
department or on a form with an identical format as the form provided by the
department, with prior approval by the administrator. Monitoring results shall
be reported to the department at the intervals specified in the permit. If
monitoring is conducted at a frequency greater than that required by the
permit, the results of the additional monitoring must be reported. In reporting
effluent limits based on average concentrations, the permittee must report the
results using an arithmetic mean, except for fecal coliform. Average results
for fecal coliform monitoring shall be reported as a geometric mean.
(V) Reporting of compliance or noncompliance
with specified dates contained in a compliance schedule of the permit shall be
submitted to the administrator no later than 14 days following each scheduled
date.
(W) For any noncompliance
which may endanger human health or the environment, an oral notification must
be made by the permittee to the administrator within 24-hours of the permittee
becoming aware of the noncompliance. Within five (5) days, the permittee must
provide a written notification of the noncompliance which describes the
noncompliance and its cause; the period and duration of noncompliance including
exact dates and times; and, if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the
anticipated time it is expected to continue and steps planned or taken to
reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrences of the noncompliance. Circumstances
that must be reported within 24-hours of becoming aware of the noncompliance
include, but are not limit ed to, any unanticipated bypass or upset which
exceeds any effluent limit in the permit; or violation of a daily maximum
discharge limitation for any of the pollutants listed by the administrator in
the permit to be reported within 24-hours of becoming aware of the
noncompliance.
(X) For
noncompliance other than as reported in (S),(V), and (W) above, the permittee
shall report all instances at the time monitoring reports are submitted. The
reports shall contain the information listed in (W) above.
(Y) Where the permittee becomes aware that it
failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application, or submitted
incorrect information in a permit application or in any report to the
administrator, it shall promptly submit such facts or information.
(Z) The permittee may allow any bypass to
occur which does not cause effluent limitations to be exceeded, but only if it
is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation. If the permittee
knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit prior notification,
if possible at least ten (10) days before the date of the bypass. If an
unanticipated bypass occurs, notice shall be provided in accordance with (W)
above. Bypass is prohibited except in instances where it is necessary to
prevent loss of life, personal injury or severe property damage; or where there
are no feasible alternatives to bypass, such as the use of auxiliary treatment
facilities, retention of untreated wastes, or maintenance during normal periods
of equipment downtime. The condition of no feasible alternative is not
satisfied if adequate back-up equipment should have been installed in the
exercise of reasonable engineering judgement to prevent a bypass which occurred
during normal periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance. The
administrator may approve an anticipated bypass, after receiving notification,
if the conditions for the allowance of bypass as described in this paragraph
have been met.
(AA) An upset
constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with
technology based permit effluent limitations if the permittee can demonstrate
that: an upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the cause(s) of the
upset; the permitted facility was, at the time of the upset, being properly
operated; the permittee submitted notice of the upset as required in (W) above;
In any enforcement proceeding, the permittee seeking to establish the
occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof.
(BB) A reopener clause which states that
additional or more stringent permit requirements may be imposed, after
following the procedures outlined in this regulation for permit modifications,
if any of the following conditions is found to be present:
(I) The water quality standards of the
receiving water(s) to which the permittee discharges are modified in such a
manner as to require effluent limits different than those contained in the
permit;
(II) A TMDL or watershed
management plan is developed and approved by the department which calls for
different effluent limitations than those contained in the permit;
(III) A TMDL or watershed management plan is
revised and approved by the department which calls for different effluent
limitations than those contained in the permit;
(IV) The use(s) of the receiving surface
water of the state is impaired and the permitted facility is contributing to
the impairment;
(V) Water quality
standards in the receiving surface waters of the state are no longer achieved
as a result of the discharge and the effluent limitations established by the
permit are being met;
(VI) The
effluent limitations in the permit do not address a pollutant that has the
potential to cause or contribute to a violation of a water quality
standard;
(VII) Applicable
technology based effluent limits are promulgated which are more stringent than
those imposed by the permit; or
(VIII) An interstate compact or agreement on
potential receiving waters is established.
(CC) A reopener provision for toxicity
limitations which states that additional or more stringent permit requirements,
a new compliance schedule, revisions to compliance dates set forth in the
permit, changes to the whole effluent toxicity protocol, or any other
conditions related to the control of toxicants may be imposed, following the
procedures outlined in this regulation for permit modifications, if one or more
of the following events occurs:
(I) Effluent
toxicity was detected late in the life of the permit near or past the deadline
for compliance;
(II) The results of
a toxicity reduction evaluation indicate that compliance with the toxic
limitations contained in the permit will require an implementation schedule
past the date for compliance and the department agrees with the
conclusion;
(III) The results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation indicate that the toxicant(s) represent
pollutant(s) that may be controlled with specific numeric effluent limitations
and the department agrees that numeric controls are the mo st appropriate
approach to controlling toxicity;
(IV) Following the imp lementation of numeric
controls for a toxicant, the department agrees that a modified whole effluent
toxicity protocol is necessary to compensate for those toxicants that are
controlled numerically;
(V) Other
conditions or characteristics are identified through a toxicity reduction
evaluation which justifies the incorporation of special conditions in the
permit to address effluent toxicity.
(DD) For permits which do no t require the
submittal of monitoring result reports at least annually, the permittee shall
report all instances of non-compliance not reported under the Section
5(c) (i)
(B), (P), (U), (V) or (W) at least
annually.
(ii) Special
conditions. In addition to conditions required in all permits, the
administrator shall establish conditions, as required on a case-by-case basis,
to provide for and assure compliance with all applicable requirements of the
CWA, the Wyoming Environmental Quality Act, and applicable Wyoming Water
Quality Rules and Regulations which have taken effect prior to final
administrative disposition of the permit. Such conditions may include but are
not limited to the following.
(A) Toxic
effluent standards which, as a minimum, comply with those established under the
CWA and may be modified in accordance with Section
5(c) (i)
(E), (BB) and (CC) and Section 12.
(B) Additional limitation(s) that may be
required in order for the permittee to meet state water quality and treatment
standards, implement TMDL requirements, achieve compliance with a plan approved
pursuant to Section 208(b) of the CWA, or attain or maintain a specified water
quality through water quality related effluent limits established under Section
302 of the CWA.
(C) Any other
requirements, including but not limited to monitoring points of compliance,
water quality monitoring stations, flow monitoring stations and irrigation
compliance points, that the administrator determines are necessary to carry out
the provisions of W.S. W.S.
W.S.
35-11-302 et seq. and to insure that water
quality standards are met and waste load allocations prepared when required by
the CWA.
(D) Where a compliance
schedule is required in order to achieve any of the conditions described in
Section
5(c) (ii)
(A), (B), or (C) above or to achieve
compliance with an effluent limitation established as set forth in Section
5(c)
(iii), the following specific requirements
will be met.
(I) Such schedule will, as a
minimum, conform to any legally applicable schedule contained in any applicable
effluent standard or water quality standard promulgated under federal or state
authority. In the absence of any such legally applicable schedule, the
administrator and permittee shall comply in the shortest reasonable period of
time.
(II) In any case where the
period of time for compliance exceeds nine (9) months, the schedule of
compliance specified in the permit will set forth interim requirements and the
dates for their achievement. In no event shall more than nine (9) months elapse
between interim dates. To the extent practicable, the interim and final dates
shall fall on the last day of the months of March, June, September, and
December.
(III) The permittee will
provide the administrator with written notice of the permittee's compliance or
non-compliance with each interim and final date either before, or within 14
days after, such compliance date is reached.
(IV) If the permittee fails or refuses to
comply with an interim or final requirement in a permit, such non-compliance
shall constitute a violation of the permit, and the administrator may
modify or revoke the permit to take direct
enforcement action.
(V) Upon
request of the permittee, the administrator may revise or modify a schedule of
compliance for good and valid cause (such as an act of God, strike, flood,
material shortage, or other event over which the permittee has little or no
control).
(VI) On the last day of
the month of February, May, August and November, the administrator shall
transmit to the Regional Administrator of the EPA, a lis t of all instances, as
of 30 days prior to the date of such report, of failure or refusal of a
permittee to comply with an interim or final compliance requirement. Such list
shall be available to the public for inspection and copying and include:
(1.) The name and address of non-complying
permittee;
(2.) A short description
of each instance of non-compliance;
(3.) Short description of any action proposed
by the permittee or the administrator to achieve compliance; and
(4.) Any details that tend to explain or
mitigate the non-compliance.
(E) Alternative schedules of compliance. A
WYPDES permit applicant or permittee may cease conducting regulated activities
(by terminating direct discharge for WYPDES sources) rather than continuing to
operate and meet permit requirements as follows:
(I) If the permittee decides to cease
conducting regulated activities at a given time within the term of a permit
which has already been issued:
(1.) The
permit may be modified to contain a new or additional schedule leading to
timely cessation of activities; or
(2.) The permittee shall cease conducting
permitted activities before non-compliance with any interim or final compliance
schedule requirement already specified in the permit.
(II) If the decision to cease conducting
regulated activities is made before issuance of a permit whose term will
include the termination date, the permit shall contain a schedule leading to
termination which will ensure timely compliance with applicable requirements no
later than the statutory deadline.
(III) If the permittee is undecided whether
to cease conducting regulated activities, the director may issue or modify a
permit to contain two schedules as follows:
(1.) Both schedules shall contain an
identical interim deadline requiring a final decision on whether to cease
conducting regulated activities no later than a date which ensures sufficient
time to comply with applicable requirements in a timely manner if the decision
is to continue conducting regulated activities;
(2.) One schedule sha ll lead to timely
compliance with applicable requirements, no later than the statutory
deadline;
(3.) The second schedule
shall lead to cessation of regulated activities by a date which will ensure
timely compliance with applicable requirements no later than the statutory
deadline.
(4.) Each permit
containing two schedules shall include a requirement that after the permittee
has made a final decision under Section
5(c) (ii)
(E) (III) the permittee shall follow the
schedule leading to compliance if the decision is to continue conducting
regulated activities, and follow the schedule leading to termination if the
decision is to cease conducting regulated activities.
(F) Best management practices.
Best management practices to control or abate the discharge of pollutants when:
(I) Authorized under Section 304(e) of the
CWA for the control of toxic pollutants and hazardous substances from ancillary
industrial activities;
(II) Numeric
effluent limitations are infeasible; or
(III) The practices are reasonably necessary
to achieve effluent limitations and standards or to carry out the purposes and
intent of these regulations.
(G) Grants. Any conditions imposed in federal
grants to POTWs under Sections 201 and 204 of the CWA which are reasonably
necessary for the achievement of effluent limitations required in accordance
with these regulations.
(iii) Effluent limitations. Effluent
limitations shall be determined for all permits based on the following
considerations.
(A) Technology-based effluent
limitations. Technology-based effluent limits shall be determined in accordance
with
40
CFR 122.44(a),
40
CFR 122.50, 40 CFR 125, Subpart A, I and J
and, for categorical industries adopted by EPA, 40 CFR Parts 405 through 411,
413 through 433, 436, 437, 439, 440, 442 through, 447, 454, 455, 457 through
461, 463 through 469, and 471.
(B)
In addition to the technology-based effluent limitations described in Section
5(c) (iii)
(A), technology-based effluent limits shall
be determined as follows:
(I) For discharges
from new and existing POTWs as described in Appendix E.
(II) For CAFO point sources as described in
Appendix G.
(III) For discharges
from oil and gas production facilities as described in Appendix H.
(IV) For discharges from coal mines as
described in Appendix J.
(V) For
discharges containing toxic pollutants as described in Appendix N.
(C) Water quality based effluent
limitations. For facilities where discharge to surface waters of the state is
not prohibited subject to the provisions of technology based effluent
limitations as determined in Section
5(c) (iii)
(A) and (B), water quality-based effluent
limits shall be determined when requirements in addition to, or more stringent,
than technology based effluent limitations are necessary to ensure that
violations of water quality standards do not occur. Such effluent limitations
shall be determined based on standards adopted pursuant to Wyoming Water
Quality Rules and Regulations, Chapter 1 and the applicable provisions of
Wyoming Water Quality Rules and Regulations, Chapter 6.
(I) Water quality based effluent limitations
shall be established for constituents in dis charges determined to have a
reasonable potential of adversely impacting uses of surface waters of the state
or of causing violations of water quality standards. When making reasonable
potential determinations, the administrator shall consider the following:
(1.) Existing controls on point and non-point
sources of pollution;
(2.) The
variability of the pollutant or pollutant parameter in the effluent;
(3.) For evaluating whole effluent toxicity,
the sensitivity of the species to toxicity testing; and
(4.) Where appropriate, the dilution of the
effluent in the receiving water.
(5.) Applicable designated uses and water
quality standards.
(II)
Where numeric criteria are promulgated for the receiving surface waters of the
state, the administrator will determine, using the most stringent numeric
standard appropriate to the receiving surface waters of the state, water
quality based effluent limitations based on one of the following methods:
(1.) Effluent limitations described in
Section
5(c) (iii)
(C) (II) (2.) and (3.) shall be established
only after having taken into account the following requirements of Wyoming
Water Quality Rules and Regulations, Chapter 1:
a. Mixing zones; and
b. Antidegradation
(2.) Where loading limitations can be
instituted on the receiving surface waters of the state through the
implementation of limitations on effluent volumes and concentrations for
discharges to the receiving surface waters of the state, effluent limitations
shall be determined based on mass balance calculations where dilution by water
in the receiving surface waters of the state is considered.
(3.) Where the administrator determines that
it is impractical to establish limitations on effluent volumes for discharges
to receiving surface waters of the state, concentration-based effluent
limitations shall be established. In no case shall a concentration-based
effluent limitation be established which exceeds the most stringent of the
numeric water quality standards established to protect the designated uses of
the receiving surface waters of the state.
(III) Where an evaluation for reasonable
potential indicates limitations based on narrative water quality standards
promulgated under Wyoming Water Quality Rules and Regulations, Chapter 1,
effluent limitations addressing the limitations of the narrative standards will
be included in the permit.
(IV)
Where the administrator determines that an effluent constituent has the
reasonable potential to adversely impact a designated use of receiving surface
waters of the state and no numeric standard has been promulgated in Wyoming
Water Quality Rules and Regulations, Chapter 1 for the constituent, the
administrator may establish a numeric effluent limitation based on values
derived from appropriate scientific methods.
(D) In the case of POTWs, permit effluent
limitations, standards, or prohibitions shall be calculated based on design
flow.
(E) Except in the case of
POTWs or as provided in Section
5(c) (i)
(E), calculation of any permit limitations,
standards, or prohibitions which are based on production (or other measure of
operation) shall be based not upon the designed production capacity but rather
upon a reasonable measure of actual production of the facility. For new sources
or new dischargers, actual production shall be estimated using projected
production. The time period of the measure of production shall correspond to
the time period of the calculated permit limitatio ns; for example, monthly
production shall be used to calculate average monthly discharge
limitations.
(F) All permit
effluent limitations, standards, or prohibitions for a metal shall be expressed
in terms of "total recoverable metal" as defined in 40 CFR Part 136 unless;
(I) The applicable water quality standard
described in Wyoming Water Quality Rules and Regulations, Chapter 1 is based on
the dissolved form;
(II) An
applicable effluent standard or limitation has been promulgated under these
regulations and specifies the limitation for the metal in the dissolved or
valenti or total form;
(III) In
establishing permit limitations on a case-by-case basis under Section
5(c)
(iii) of these regulations it is necessary to
express the limitation on the metal in the dissolved or valenti or total form
to carry out the provisions of these regulations; or
(IV) All approved analytical methods for the
metal inherently measure only its dissolved form (e.g., hexavalent
chromium).
(G) For
continuous discharges (discharges that occur without interruption throughout
the operating hours of the facility, except for infrequent shutdowns for
maintenance, process changes, or other similar activities) all permit effluent
limitations, standards, and prohibitions, including those necessary to achieve
water quality standards, shall unless impracticable be stated as:
(I) Daily maximum and average monthly
discharge limitations for all dischargers other than POTWs; and
(II) Average weekly and average monthly
discharge limitations for POTWs.
(H) Discharges which are not continuous shall
be particularly described and limited, considering the following factors as
appropriate:
(I) Frequency (for example, a
batch discharge shall not occur more than once every three (3)
weeks);
(II) Total mass (for
example, no t to exceed 100 kilograms of zinc and 200 kilograms of chromium per
batch discharge);
(III) Maximum
rate of discharge of pollutants during the discharge (for example, not to
exceed two (2) kilograms of zinc per minute); and
(IV) Prohibition or limitation of specified
pollutants by mass, concentration or other appropriate measure (for example,
shall not contain at any time more than 0.1 mg/l zinc or more than 250 grams
(1/4 kilogram) of zinc in any discharge).
(I) Mass limitations.
(I) All pollutants limited in permits shall
have limitations, standards or prohibitions expressed in terms of mass except:
(1.) For pH, temperature, radiation, or other
pollutants which cannot appropriately be expressed by mass;
(2.) When applicable standards and
limitations are expressed in terms of other units of measurement; or
(3.) If an applicable effluent standard or
limitation has been promulgated under these regulations and limitations
expressed in terms of mass are infeasible because the mass of the pollutant
discharged cannot be related to a measure of operation (for example, discharges
of total suspended solids [TSS] from certain mining operations), and permit
conditions ensure that dilution will not be used as a substitute for
treatment.
(II)
Pollutants limited in terms of mass additionally may be limit ed in terms of
other units of measurement, and the permit shall require the permittee to
comply with both limitations.
(J) Pollutants in intake water.
(I) Credit shall be granted only if the
discharger demonstrates that the intake water is drawn from the same body of
water into which the discharge is made.
(II) Upon request of the discharger,
technology-based effluent limitations or standards shall be adjusted to reflect
credit for pollutants in the discharger's intake water if:
(1.) The applicable effluent limitations and
standards contained in Section
5(c)
(iii) of these regulations provide that they
shall be applied on a net basis; or
(2.) The discharger demonstrates that the
control system it proposes or uses to meet applicable technology-based
limitations and standards would, if properly installed and operated, meet the
limitations and standards in the absence of pollutants in the intake
waters.
(III) Credit for
generic pollutants such as biochemical oxygen demand
(BOD5) or TSS shall not be granted unless the permittee
demonstrates that the constituents of the generic measure in the effluent are
substantially similar to the constituents of the generic measure in the intake
water or unless appropriate additional limits are placed on process wastewater
pollutants either at the outfall or elsewhere.
(IV) Credit shall be granted only to the
extent necessary to meet the applicable limitation or standard, up to a maximum
value equal to the influent value. Additional monitoring may be necessary to
determine eligibility for credits and compliance with permit limits.
(K) Internal waste streams.
(I) When permit effluent limitations or
standards imposed at the point of discharge are impractical or infeasible,
effluent limitations or standards for discharges or pollutants may be imposed
on internal waste streams before mixing wit h other waste streams or cooling
water streams. In those instances, the monitoring required by Section
5(c) or other applicable
provisions of these regulations shall also be applied to the internal waste
streams.
(II) Limits on internal
waste streams will be imposed only when the fact sheet sets forth the
exceptional circumstances which make such limitations necessary, such as when
the final discharge point is inaccessible (for example, under ten [10] meters
of water), the wastes at the point of discharge are so diluted as to make
monitoring impracticable, or the interferences among pollutants at the point of
discharge would make detection or analysis impracticable.
(L) After making the considerations described
in Section
5(c) (iii)
(A), (B) and (C), the administrator shall
establish in the draft permit the most stringent of the effluent limitations of
those derived.
(M) Effluent
limitations cannot be incorporated into modified or reissued permits which
violate anti-backsliding provisions of Section 402(o) of the CWA.
(N) If any applicable toxic effluent standard
or prohibition (including any schedule of compliance specified in such effluent
standard or prohibition) is promulgated under W.S.
W.S.
35-11-302 or Wyoming Water Quality Rules and
Regulations, Chapters 1 and 2 for a toxic pollutant and that standard or
prohibition is more stringent than any limitation on the pollutant in the
permit, the director shall institute proceedings under these regulations to
modify or revoke and reissue the permit to conform to the toxic effluent
standard or prohibition.
(O) When
the department determines, using the procedures in Section
5(c) (iii)
(C) (I) and (ll), that a discharge causes,
has the reasonable potential to cause, or contributes to an in-stream excursion
above the numeric standard for whole effluent toxicity, if any such criterion
has been adopted, the permit must contain effluent limits for whole effluent
toxicity.
(P) Except as provided in
this subparagraph, when the department determines, using the procedures in
Section
5(c) (iii)
(C), toxicity testing data, or other
information, that a discharge causes, has the reasonable potential to cause, or
contributes to an in-stream violation of a narrative water quality standard,
the permit shall contain limitations, which include effluent limits, for whole
effluent toxicity. Such limitations are to be derived by the department and
based upon the department's determination of what constitutes an acceptable
level of whole effluent toxicity. Limits on whole effluent toxicity are not
necessary where the department determines, using the procedures in Section
5(c) (iii)
(C), that chemical-specific limits for the
effluent are sufficient to attain and maintain applicable numeric and narrative
water quality standards.
(Q) Unless
otherwise stated in the permit, effluent limitations shall be met at the
outfall from the final treatment unit prior to admixture with water in the
receiving surface waters of the state or with effluent from other
outfalls.
(v) Monitoring, recording, and reporting.
(A) All permits shall specify required
monitoring including type, intervals, and frequency sufficient to yield data
which are representative of the monitored activity including, when appropriate,
continuous monitoring. Monitoring results required by the permit shall be
reported on a discharge monitoring report (DMR) or other forms provided or
specified by the division.
(B) Any
discharge authorized by a permit shall be subject to such monitoring
requirements as may be required by the administrator including the
installation, use, and maintenance of monitoring equipment.
(C) Any major facility authorized by a
permit, or for which monitoring is requested in writing by the Regional
Administrator of the EPA, or which contains toxic pollutants for which an
effluent standard has been promulgated pursuant to these regulations, shall be
monitored at intervals sufficiently frequent to characterize the discharge, for
the following:
(I) Flow;
(II) All of the following pollutants:
(1.) Pollutants which are subject to
reduction or elimination by the terms of the permit;
(2.) Pollutants which the administrator finds
could have an impact on the surface waters of the state;
(3.) Pollutants specified by the
Administrator of the EPA as subject to monitoring; and
(4.) Any pollutants, in addition to those
above, that the Regional Administrator of the EPA requests in writing be
monitored.
(D) The permittee shall maintain records of
all information resulting from monitoring activities required by his permit for
a period of three (3) years, or for a longer period if so requested by the
administrator, or Regional Administrator of the EPA. Such records shall
include, but are not limited to, the following:
(I) The date, location, and time of the
sampling;
(II) The dates and by
whom analyses were performed;
(III)
Analytical techniques used;
(IV)
The results of such analyses;
(V)
Name of the person collecting the sample(s);
(VI) Sampling handling and preservation
conducted; and
(VII) Detection
limits for analyses conducted.
(E) Unless otherwise approved by the
administrator, the permittee shall be required to periodically report, at a
frequency of not less than once per year, to the administrator, on the proper
forms, the results of any monitoring required by the permit. In addition, the
administrator may require the submission of such additional monitoring
information he may consider necessary. Where applicable, the procedures
specified will be consistent with any national program specified by the
Administrator of the EPA in regulations promulgated under the CWA.
(F) All reports required by permits and other
information requested by the administrator shall be signed and certified as
described in Section 14 of these regulations.
(G) Sample collection and analyses shall be
conducted in accordance with 40 CFR 136, unless otherwise specified in these
regulations.
(H) Any person
falsifying, tampering with, or knowingly rendering inaccurate any monitoring
device or method required to be maintained under this permit is a violation of
the permit, these regulations and the Wyoming Environmental Quality
Act.