Water suppliers for each community water system shall
provide to their customers an annual report that contains all of the
information specified in this section and s.
NR 809.835.
(1)
INFORMATION ON THE SOURCE OF THE WATER DELIVERED. Each report shall identify
the sources of the water delivered by the community water system by providing
information on all of the following:
(a) The
type of the water, including, surface water, groundwater.
(b) The commonly used name, if any, and
location of the bodies of water.
(c) If a source water assessment has been
completed, the report shall notify consumers of the availability of this
information and the means to obtain it. In addition, water suppliers are
encouraged to highlight in the report significant sources of contamination in
the source water area if they have readily available information. If a public
water system has received a source water assessment from the department, the
report shall include a brief summary of the public water system's
susceptibility to potential sources of contamination, using language provided
by the department or written by the water suppliers.
(2) DEFINITIONS.
(a) Each report shall include all of the
following definitions:
1. Maximum contaminant
level goal or MCLG: The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which
there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of
safety.
2. Maximum contaminant
level or MCL: The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking
water. MCLs are set as close to the MCLGs as feasible using the best available
treatment technology.
(b)
A report for a community water system operating under a variance or an
exemption issued under subch. VI shall include the following definition,
"Variances and Exemptions: state or EPA permission not to meet an MCL or a
treatment technique under certain conditions."
(c) A report which contains data on
contaminants which EPA regulates using any of the following terms shall include
the applicable definitions:
1. "Treatment
technique: A required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in
drinking water."
2. "Action level:
The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or
other requirements which a public water system shall follow."
3. "Maximum residual disinfectant level goal
or MRDLG: The level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no
known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use
of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants."
4. "Maximum residual disinfectant level or
MRDL: The highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is
convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of
microbial contaminants."
(d) A report that contains information
regarding a Level 1 or Level 2 Assessment required in s.
NR 809.313 shall include the following definitions:
1. "Level 1 Assessment: A Level 1 assessment
is a study of the water system to identify potential problems and determine, if
possible, why total coliform bacteria have been found in our water
system."
2. "Level 2 Assessment: A
Level 2 assessment is a very detailed study of the water system to identify
potential problems and determine, if possible, why an E. coli
MCL violation has occurred or why total coliform bacteria have been found in
our water system, or both, on multiple
occasions."
(3)
INFORMATION ON DETECTED CONTAMINANTS. With the exception of
Cryptosporidium, reports shall contain the following
information in the specified format, for regulated contaminants subject to a
MCL, action level, maximum residual disinfectant level, microbial contaminants,
or treatment technique, unregulated contaminants for which monitoring is
required under subch. I, and disinfection by-products for which monitoring is
required under subch. III:
(a) The data
relating to these contaminants shall be displayed in one table or in several
adjacent tables. Any additional monitoring results which a water supplier
chooses to include in its report shall be displayed separately.
(b) The data shall be derived from data
collected to comply with EPA and department monitoring and analytical
requirements during calendar year 1998 for the first report and subsequent
calendar years thereafter except that:
1. If
a public water system is allowed to be monitored for regulated contaminants
less often than once a year, the tables shall include the date and results of
the most recent sampling and the report shall include a brief statement
indicating that the data presented in the report are from the most recent
testing done in accordance with the regulations. No data older than 5 years
need be included.
2. Results of
monitoring in compliance with requirements issued under 40 CFR Sub. D, part
141.142 and 141.143 under the information collection rule need only be included
for 5 years from the date of last sample or until any of the detected
contaminants becomes regulated and subject to routine monitoring requirements,
whichever comes first.
(c) For detected regulated contaminants,
listed in Appendix A to this subchapter, the tables shall contain all of the
following:
1. The MCL for that contaminant
expressed as a number equal to or greater than 1.0, as provided in Appendix A
to this subchapter.
2. The MCLG for
that contaminant expressed in the same units as the MCL.
3. If there is no MCL for a detected
contaminant, the table shall indicate that there is a treatment technique, or
specify the action level, applicable to that contaminant, and the report shall
include the definitions for treatment technique or action level, or both, as
appropriate, specified in this paragraph.
4. For contaminants subject to an MCL, except
turbidity and
E. coli, the highest contaminant level used to
determine compliance with requirements of this chapter and the range of
detected levels as follows:
a. When compliance
with the MCL is determined annually or less frequently: the highest detected
level at any sampling point and the range of detected levels expressed in the
same units as the MCL.
b. When
compliance with the MCL is determined by calculating a running annual average
of all samples taken at a sampling point: the highest average of any of the
sampling points and the range of all sampling points expressed in the same
units as the MCL. When the MCL for TTHM or HAA5 in s.
NR 809.561(2) is exceeded at a
locational running annual average monitoring location, systems must include the
highest locational running annual average for TTHM and HAA5 and the range of
individual sample results for all monitoring locations expressed in the units
as the MCL. If more than one location exceeds the TTHM or HAA5 MCL, the system
must include the locational running annual averages for all locations that
exceed the MCL.
c. When compliance
with the MCL is determined on a public water system-wide basis by calculating a
running annual average of all samples at all sampling points: the average and
range of detection expressed in the same units as the MCL.
Note: When rounding of results to determine
compliance with the MCL is allowed by the regulations, rounding should be done
prior to multiplying the results by the factor listed in Appendix A of this
subchapter.
5. For
turbidity:
a. When it is reported pursuant to
s.
NR 810.29, the highest average monthly value.
b. When it is reported pursuant to s.
NR 810.29, the highest monthly value. The report should
include an explanation of the reasons for measuring turbidity.
c. When it is reported pursuant to s.
NR 810.29, the highest single measurement and the lowest
monthly percentage of samples meeting the turbidity limits specified in s.
NR 810.29 for the filtration technology being used. The
report should include an explanation of the reasons for measuring
turbidity.
6. For lead
and copper: the 90 th percentile value of the most recent round of sampling and
the number of sampling sites exceeding the action level.
7. For E. coli analytical
results under s.
NR 809.31, the total number of positive
samples.
8. The likely sources of
detected contaminants to the best of the water supplier's knowledge. Specific
information regarding contaminants may be available in sanitary surveys and
source water assessments, and should be used when available to the water
supplier. If the water supplier lacks specific information on the likely
source, the report shall include one or more of the typical sources for that
contaminant listed in Appendix A to this subchapter that are most applicable to
the public water system.
(d) If a community water system distributes
water to its customers from multiple hydraulically independent distribution
systems that are fed by different raw water sources, the table should contain a
separate column for each service area and the report should identify each
separate distribution system. Alternatively, water suppliers could produce
separate reports tailored to include data for each service area.
(e) The tables shall clearly identify any
data indicating violations of MCLs or treatment techniques and the report shall
contain a clear and readily understandable explanation of the violation
including: the length of the violation, the potential adverse health effects,
and actions taken by the water supplier to address the violation. To describe
the potential health effects, the water supplier shall use the relevant
language of Appendix A to this subchapter.
(f) For detected unregulated contaminants for
which monitoring is required, except Cryptosporidium, the
tables shall contain the average and range at which the contaminant was
detected. The report may include a brief explanation of the reasons for
monitoring for unregulated contaminants.
(4) INFORMATION ON CRYPTOSPORIDIUM, RADON AND
OTHER CONTAMINANTS.
(a) If the water supplier
has performed any monitoring for
Cryptosporidium, including
monitoring performed to satisfy the requirements of 40 CFR sub. D, part 141, s.
141.143 (information collection rule), which indicates that
Cryptosporidium may be present in the source water or the
finished water, the report shall include all of the following:
1. A summary of the results of the
monitoring.
2. An explanation of
the significance of the results.
(b) If the water supplier has performed any
monitoring for radon which indicates that radon may be present in the finished
water, the report shall include all of the following:
1. The results of the monitoring.
2. An explanation of the significance of the
results.
(c) If the water
supplier has performed additional monitoring which indicates the presence of
other contaminants in the finished water, the report shall include all of the
following:
1. The results of the
monitoring.
2. An explanation of
the significance of the results noting the existence of a health advisory or a
proposed regulation.
Note: To determine the significance of the
results it is recommended that water supplier call the Safe Drinking Water
Hotline at 800-426-4791.
(5) COMPLIANCE WITH ALL DRINKING WATER
REGULATIONS. In addition to the requirements of sub. (3) (f), the report shall
note any violation that occurred during the year covered by the report of a
requirement listed in this subsection. The report also shall include a clear
and readily understandable explanation of the violation, any potential adverse
health effects, and the steps the water supplier has taken to correct the
violation. All of the following violations shall be included:
(a) Failure to comply with requirements for
monitoring and reporting of compliance data.
(b) For public water systems which have
failed to install adequate filtration or disinfection equipment or processes,
or have had a failure of the equipment or processes which constitutes a
violation, the report shall include the following language as part of the
explanation of potential adverse health effects. Inadequately treated water may
contain disease-causing organisms. These organisms include bacteria, viruses
and parasites, which can cause symptoms such as nausea, cramps, diarrhea and
associated headaches.
(c) Lead and
copper control requirements that are prescribed by subch. II. For public water
systems that fail to take one or more actions prescribed by s.
NR 809.541(4), 809.542, 809.543, 809.544
or 809.545, the report shall include the applicable language of Appendix A to
this subchapter for lead, copper or both.
(d) Treatment techniques for Acrylamide and
Epichlorohydrin that are prescribed by subch. I. For public water systems that
violate the requirements of s.
NR 809.25(4), the report shall include
the relevant language from Appendix A to this subchapter.
(e) Failure to comply with required
recordkeeping of compliance data.
(f) Failure to comply with special monitoring
requirements prescribed by ss.
NR 809.118 and 809.25.
(g) Violation of the terms of a variance, an
exemption or an administrative or judicial order.
(6) EXEMPTIONS. If a public water system is
operating under the terms of a conditional waiver or variance issued under
subch. VI, the report shall contain all of the following:
(a) An explanation of the reasons for the
variance or exemption.
(b) The date
on which the variance or exemption was issued.
(c) A brief status report on the steps the
water supplier is taking to install treatment, find alternative sources of
water or otherwise comply with the terms and schedules of the variance or
exemption.
(d) A notice of any
opportunity for public input in the review, or renewal, of the variance or
exemption.
(7) ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION.
(a)
Contaminants in
drinking water. The report shall contain a brief explanation regarding
contaminants, which may reasonably be expected to be found in drinking water
including bottled water. This explanation may include the language of subds. 1.
to 3. or water supplier may use their own comparable language. The report also
shall include the language of subd. 4.
1.
"The sources of drinking water, both tap water and bottled water, include
rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs and wells. As water travels
over the surface of the land or to the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring
minerals and, in some cases, radioactive material, and can pick up substances
resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity."
2. "Contaminants that may be present in
source water include:"
a. "Microbial
contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, which may come from sewage
treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations and
wildlife."
b. "Inorganic
contaminants, such as salts and metals, which can be naturally-occurring or
result from urban stormwater runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater
discharges, oil and gas production, mining or farming."
c. "Pesticides and herbicides, which may come
from a variety of sources such as agriculture, urban stormwater runoff and
residential uses."
d. "Organic
chemical contaminants, including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals,
which are by-products of industrial processes and petroleum production, and can
also come from gas stations, urban stormwater runoff and septic
systems."
e. "Radioactive
contaminants, which can be naturally occurring or the result of oil and gas
production and mining activities."
3. "In order to ensure that tap water is safe
to drink, EPA prescribes regulations that limit the amount of certain
contaminants in water provided by public water systems. FDA regulations
establish limits for contaminants in bottled water, which shall provide the
same protection for public health."
4. "Drinking water, including bottled water,
may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some
contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that
water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential
health effects can be obtained by calling the environmental protection agency's
safe drinking water hotline (800-426-4791)."
(b)
Water supplier contact
information. The report shall include the telephone number of the
owner, operator or designee of the community water system as a source of
additional information concerning the report.
(c)
Non-English
translations. In communities where non-English speaking residents
comprise a significant portion of the population served, the report shall
contain information in the appropriate language or languages regarding the
importance of the report, or contain a telephone number or address where the
residents may contact the public water system to obtain a translated copy of
the report or assistance in the appropriate language. In communities where a
specific non-English speaking group comprises at least 5% of the population of
the community served, the report shall be translated into that
language.
(d)
Public
participation opportunities. The report shall include information,
including, time and place of regularly scheduled board meetings, about
opportunities for public participation in decisions that may affect the quality
of the water.
(e)
Additional public education. The water suppliers may include
additional information as they deem necessary for public education consistent
with, and not detracting from, the purpose of the report.
(f)
Public water systems with
significant deficiencies or E. coli positives under s.
NR 809.325.
1.
A water supplier for any groundwater system that receives notice from the
department of a significant deficiency or notice from a laboratory of a fecal
indicator-positive groundwater source sample required under s.
NR 809.325(2), that is not invalidated
by the department under s.
NR 809.323(2), must inform its customers
of any significant deficiency that is uncorrected at the time of the next
report or of any fecal indicator-positive groundwater source sample in the next
report.
2. The water supplier must
continue to inform the public annually until the department determines that
particular significant deficiency is corrected or the fecal contamination in
the groundwater source is addressed under s.
NR 809.327(1). Each report must include
all the following applicable elements:
a. The
nature of the particular significant deficiency or the source of the fecal
contamination, if the source is known, and the date the significant deficiency
was identified by the department or the dates of the fecal indicator-positive
groundwater source samples.
b. If
the fecal contamination in the groundwater source has been addressed under s.
NR 809.327(1) and the date of such
action.
c. For each significant
deficiency or fecal contamination in the groundwater source that has not been
addressed under s.
NR 809.327(1), the department approved
plan and schedule for correction, including interim measures, progress to date,
and any interim measures completed.
d. If the public water system receives notice
of a fecal indicator-positive groundwater source sample that is not invalidated
by the department under s.
NR 809.323(2), the potential health
effects using the health effects language of Appendix A of subch.
V.
3. If directed by the
department, a water supplier for a public water system with significant
deficiencies that have been corrected before the next report is issued must
inform the customers, of the public water system, of the significant
deficiency, how the deficiency was corrected, and the date of correction under
subd. 1.
(g)
Water suppliers required to conduct Level 1 or Level 2 assessments not
resulting from an E. coli MCL violation. Any water supplier required
to comply with the Level 1 assessment requirement or a Level 2 assessment
requirement that is not resulting from an
E. coli MCL
violation must include in the report the text found in subds. 1. to 3. as
appropriate, filling in the blanks accordingly. Any water supplier that has
failed to complete all the required assessments or correct all identified
sanitary defects is in violation of the treatment technique requirement and
must also include one or both of the statements in subds. 4. and 5. of this
paragraph, as appropriate.
1. Coliforms are
bacteria that are naturally present in the environment and are used as an
indicator that other, potentially harmful, waterborne pathogens may be present
or that a potential pathway exists through which contamination may enter the
drinking water distribution system. [NAME OF WATER SUPPLIER] found coliforms
indicating the need to look for potential problems in water treatment or
distribution. When this occurs, [NAME OF WATER SUPPLIER] is required to conduct
assessments to identify problems and to correct any problems that were found
during these assessments.
2. During
the past year we were required to conduct [INSERT NUMBER OF LEVEL 1
ASSESSMENTS] Level 1 assessments. [INSERT NUMBER OF LEVEL 1 ASSESSMENTS] Level
1 assessments were completed. In addition, we were required to take [INSERT
NUMBER OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS] corrective actions and we completed [INSERT
NUMBER OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS] of these actions.
3. During the past year [INSERT NUMBER OF
LEVEL 2 ASSESSMENTS] Level 2 assessments were required to be completed for our
water system. [INSERT NUMBER OF LEVEL 2 ASSESSMENTS] Level 2 assessments were
completed. In addition, we were required to take [INSERT NUMBER OF CORRECTIVE
ACTIONS] corrective actions and we completed [INSERT NUMBER OF CORRECTIVE
ACTIONS] of these actions.
4.
During the past year we failed to conduct all of the required
assessments.
5. During the past
year we failed to correct all identified defects that were found during the
assessments.
(h)
Water suppliers required to conduct Level 2 assessments resulting from
an E. coli MCL violation. Any water supplier required to conduct a
Level 2 assessment resulting from an
E. coli MCL violation
must include in the report the text found in subds. 1. and 2., filling in the
blanks accordingly, if appropriate. Any system that has failed to complete the
required assessment or correct all identified sanitary defects is in violation
of the treatment technique requirement and must also include the statements in
subds. 3. and 4., as appropriate.
1. E. coli
are bacteria whose presence indicates that the water may be contaminated with
human or animal wastes. Human pathogens in these wastes can cause short-term
effects, such as diarrhea, cramps, nausea, headaches, or other symptoms. They
may pose a greater health risk for infants, young children, the elderly, and
people with severely compromised immune systems. We found E.
coli bacteria, indicating the need to look for potential problems in
water treatment or distribution. When this occurs, we are required to conduct
assessments to identify problems and to correct any problems that were found
during these assessments.
2. We
were required to complete a Level 2 assessment because we found E.
coli in our water system. In addition, we were required to take
[INSERT NUMBER OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS] corrective actions and we completed
[INSERT NUMBER OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS] of these actions.
3. We failed to conduct the required
assessment.
4. We failed to correct
all sanitary defects that were identified during the assessment that we
conducted.
(i)
Water suppliers detecting E. coli and violating the E. coli
MCL. If a water supplier detects
E. coli and has
violated the
E. coli MCL, in addition to completing the table
as required in sub. (3) (c), the water supplier must include one or more of the
statements in subds.1. to 4. to describe any noncompliance, as applicable:
1. We had an E.
coli-positive repeat sample following a total coliform-positive
routine sample.
2. We had a total
coliform-positive repeat sample following an E. coli-positive
routine sample.
3. We failed to
take all required repeat samples following an E. coli-positive
routine sample.
4. We failed to
test for E. coli when any repeat sample tests positive for
total coliform.