(1) GENERAL REQUIREMENTS. The general
requirements for compliance with this subchapter are as follows:
(a) If compliance is based on a running
annual average of monthly or quarterly samples or an annual average and the
water supplier for a public water system fails to monitor for TTHM, HAA5 or
bromate, this failure to monitor shall be treated as a monitoring violation for
the entire period covered by the annual average.
(b) If compliance is based on a running
annual average of monthly or quarterly samples or averages and the water
supplier's failure to monitor the public water system makes it impossible to
determine compliance with MRDLs for chlorine and chloramines, failure to
monitor shall be treated as a monitoring violation for the entire period
covered by the annual average.
(c)
All samples taken and analyzed under the provisions of this subchapter shall be
included in determining compliance, even if that number is greater than the
minimum required.
(d) If, during
the first year of monitoring under s.
NR 809.565, any individual quarter's average will cause
the running annual average of that public water system to exceed the MCL, the
public water system is out of compliance at the end of that quarter.
(2) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR
DISINFECTION BYPRODUCTS.
(a)
TTHMs and
HAA5s. Compliance for TTHMs and HAA5s shall be based one of the
following:
1. For public water systems
monitored quarterly, compliance with MCLs in s.
NR 809.561(3) shall be based on a
running annual arithmetic average, computed quarterly, of quarterly arithmetic
averages of all samples collected by the water supplier as prescribed by s.
NR 809.565(2). If the running annual
arithmetic average of quarterly averages covering any consecutive 4-quarter
period exceeds the MCL, the public water system is in violation of the MCL and
the water supplier shall notify the public pursuant to subch. VII, in addition
to reporting to the department pursuant to s.
NR 809.567. If the water supplier for a public water
system fails to complete 4 consecutive quarters of monitoring, compliance with
the MCL for the last 4-quarter compliance period shall be based on an average
of the available data.
2. For
public water systems monitored less frequently than quarterly, compliance with
MCLs in s.
NR 809.561(3) shall be based on an
average of samples taken that year under the provisions of s.
NR 809.565(2). If the average of these
samples exceeds the MCL, the water supplier shall increase monitoring to once
per quarter per treatment plant and the public water system is not in violation
of the MCL until it has completed one year of quarterly monitoring, unless the
result of fewer than 4 quarters of monitoring will cause the running annual
average to exceed the MCL, in which case the public water system is in
violation at the end of that quarter. Water supplier for public water systems
required to increase monitoring frequency to quarterly monitoring shall
calculate compliance by including the sample which triggered the increased
monitoring plus the following 3 quarters of monitoring.
3. If the running annual arithmetic average
of quarterly averages covering any consecutive 4-quarter period exceeds the
MCL, the public water system is in violation of the MCL and the water supplier
shall notify the public pursuant to subch. VII, in addition to reporting to the
department pursuant to s.
NR 809.567.
(b)
Bromate. Compliance for
bromate shall be based on a running annual arithmetic average, computed
quarterly, of monthly samples or, for months in which the water supplier for
the public water system takes more than one sample, the average of all samples
taken during the month, collected by the water supplier as prescribed by s.
NR 809.565(3) (b). If the average of
samples covering any consecutive 4-quarter period exceeds the MCL, the public
water system is in violation of the MCL and the water supplier shall notify the
public pursuant to subch. VII, in addition to reporting to the department
pursuant to s.
NR 809.567. If the water supplier for a public water
system fails to complete 12 consecutive months of monitoring, compliance with
the MCL for the last 4-quarter compliance period shall be based on an average
of the available data.
(c)Chlorite. Compliance for
chlorite shall be based on an arithmetic average of each 3-sample set taken in
the distribution system as prescribed by s.
NR 809.565(3) (a) 2. and 3. If the
arithmetic average of any 3-sample set exceeds the MCL, the public water system
is in violation of the MCL and the water supplier shall notify the public
pursuant to subch. VII, in addition to reporting to the department pursuant to
s.
NR 809.567.
(3) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR DISINFECTANT
RESIDUALS.
(a)
Chlorine and
chloramines.1. Compliance shall be
based on a running annual arithmetic average, computed quarterly, of monthly
averages of all samples collected by the water supplier for a public water
system under s.
NR 809.565(4) (a). If the average of
quarterly averages covering any consecutive 4-quarter period exceeds the MRDL,
the public water system is in violation of the MRDL and the water supplier
shall notify the public pursuant to subch. VII, in addition to reporting to the
department pursuant to s.
NR 809.567.
2. In cases where chlorine and chloramines
are used for residual disinfection during the year, compliance shall be
determined by including together all monitoring results of both chlorine and
chloramines in calculating compliance. Reports submitted pursuant to s.
NR 809.567 shall clearly indicate which residual
disinfectant was analyzed for each sample.
(b)
Chlorine dioxide.
Compliance shall be based on consecutive daily samples collected by the water
supplier under s.
NR 809.565(4) (b).
1. A public water system has an acute
violation of the MRDL for chlorine dioxide when any daily sample taken at the
entrance to the distribution system exceeds the MRDL and on the following day
one or more of the 3 samples taken in the distribution system exceeds the MRDL.
If both exceedances occur, the public water system is in violation of the MRDL
and the water supplier shall take immediate corrective action to lower the
level of chlorine dioxide below the MRDL and shall notify the public pursuant
to the procedures for acute health risks in s.
NR 809.951. Failure to take samples in the distribution
system the day following an exceedance of the chlorine dioxide MRDL at the
entrance to the distribution system shall also be considered an MRDL violation
and the water supplier shall notify the public of the violation in accordance
with the provisions for acute violations under s.
NR 809.951.
2. A public water system has a nonacute
violation for chlorine dioxide when any 2 consecutive daily samples taken at
the entrance to the distribution system exceed the MRDL and all distribution
system samples taken are below the MRDL. A water supplier for a public water
system with a nonacute violation shall take corrective action to lower the
level of chlorine dioxide below the MRDL at the point of sampling and shall
notify the public pursuant to the procedures for nonacute health risks in
subch. VII. Failure to monitor at the entrance to the distribution system the
day following an exceedance of the chlorine dioxide MRDL at the entrance to the
distribution system is also an MRDL violation and the water supplier shall
notify the public of the violation in accordance with the provisions for
nonacute violations under subch. VII.
(4) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR DISINFECTION
BYPRODUCT PRECURSORS (DBPP). Compliance with disinfection byproduct precursors
shall be determined as specified in s.
NR 809.569(1). Water suppliers for
public water systems may begin monitoring to determine whether Step 1 TOC
removals can be met 12 months prior to the compliance date for the public water
system. This monitoring is not required and failure to monitor during this
period is not a violation. However, any water supplier that does not monitor
during this period, and then determines in the first 12 months after the
compliance date that it is not able to meet the Step 1 requirements in s.
NR 809.569(1) (b) and therefore applies
for alternate minimum TOC removal (Step 2) requirements, is not eligible for
retroactive approval of alternate minimum TOC removal (Step 2) requirements as
allowed pursuant to s.
NR 809.569(1) (c) and is in violation.
Water supplier may apply for alternate minimum TOC removal (Step 2)
requirements any time after the compliance date. For public water systems
required to meet Step 1 TOC removals, if the value calculated under s.
NR 809.569(3) (a) or (b) is less than
1.00, the public water system is in violation of the treatment technique
requirements and the water supplier shall notify the public pursuant to subch.
VII in addition to reporting to the department pursuant to s.
NR 809.567.