(1) COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENTS AND SUPERFUND STATE CONTRACTS. The department may enter into
cooperative agreements or Superfund state contracts with the U.S. EPA for the
purpose of taking a response action under CERCLA. The department may use money
from the appropriations referenced in s.
292.31(7),
Stats., to pay the required Superfund state cost share of any
Superfund-financed remedial action taken at a national priorities list site in
accordance with the criteria in sub. (2).
(2) CRITERIA FOR COST SHARING.
(a)
General. The department
shall consider the criteria in pars. (b) to (h), to determine whether or not to
enter into a Superfund state contract with U.S. EPA.
(b)
Department evaluation of the
proposed remedial action. The department shall review the remedial
investigation, feasibility study, the proposed plan and any other reports
prepared by U.S. EPA to evaluate the proposed remedial action. The department
may not commit the required Superfund state cost share for a remedial action
unless the department is in substantial agreement with EPA's assessment of the
expected ability of the proposed remedial action to protect public health,
safety and welfare and the environment, and to comply with the applicable state
environmental and public health laws and standards, whichever are more
stringent.
(c)
Money
available to the department. The department shall consider the money
available from the appropriations in s.
292.31(7) (b), Stats., taking into account all of the
following:
1. At the beginning of each fiscal
year, the department shall reserve adequate funds for planned investigations,
environmental repair and hazardous substance spill program response actions,
abandoned container response actions, LUST program state matching funds and
emergency actions.
2. The
department shall consider the timing of expenditures in relation to the end of
the state fiscal year and the availability of new appropriations. When nearing
the end of a state fiscal year, the department may use funds earlier reserved
for environmental repair or hazardous substance spill program response actions,
abandoned container response actions and emergency immediate actions, to commit
to a Superfund state cost share for remedial actions to be taken at a national
priorities list site.
(d)
Money available from other
sources. The department shall consider the money available from other
sources to pay the capital cost and annual operation and maintenance costs for
remedial actions taken at a national priorities list site. Sources may include
any one of the following:
1. Potentially
responsible parties or interested persons, including local governments, who are
willing and able to pay any part of the remedial action costs.
2. Funding from the Wisconsin well
compensation program under s.
281.75,
Stats.
3. For mining facilities,
the investment and local impact fund under s.
289.68(2) to (4), Stats.
4. Closure bonds or other proof of financial
responsibility that were previously submitted to the department.
(e)
Timing of response
actions. The department shall consider whether or not the threat to
public health, safety or welfare or the environment at the site or facility
shall become greater if remedial action is delayed.
(f)
Preclusion of other
projects. The department shall consider whether the department's
ability to take response action at other sites or facilities shall be precluded
by committing state funds for the Superfund state cost share for the proposed
remedial action to be taken at a national priorities list site.
(g)
Department staff
resources. The department shall consider the availability of
department staff to serve as project managers and to review
submittals.
(h)
Other
criteria. The department may consider any other criteria it deems
appropriate.
(3)
NOTIFICATION. After consideration of the criteria in sub. (2), the department
shall notify EPA as to whether or not the department shall commit the required
Superfund state cost share for the proposed remedial action to be taken under
CERCLA.