Wisconsin Administrative Code
Department of Natural Resources
NR 400-499 - Environmental Protection - Air Pollution Control
Chapter NR 466 - National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for printing and flexible substrate surface coating processes
Subchapter I - Printing and Publishing
Section NR 466.07 - Standards: product and packaging rotogravure and wide-web flexographic printing
Universal Citation: WI Admin Code ยง NR 466.07
Current through August 26, 2024
(1) COMPLIANCE DATES. Each owner or operator of any product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing affected source that is subject to the requirements of this chapter shall comply with this section on and after the compliance dates as specified in s. NR 466.08.
(2) EMISSION LIMITATIONS. The owner or operator of each product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing affected source shall limit organic HAP emissions to no more than any one of the following:
(a) Five percent of the
organic HAP applied for the month.
(b) Four percent of the mass of inks,
coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers, solvents, reducers, thinners and other
materials applied for the month.
(c) Twenty percent of the mass of solids
applied for the month.
(d) A
calculated equivalent allowable mass based on the organic HAP and solids
contents of the inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers, solvents,
reducers, thinners and other materials applied for the month.
(3) COMPLIANCE METHODS. The owner or operator of each product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing affected source shall demonstrate compliance with sub. (2) according to one of the following procedures:
(a)
Demonstrate that each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent,
diluent, reducer, thinner and other material applied during the month contains
no more than 0.04 weight-fraction organic HAP, on an as-purchased basis, as
determined in accordance with s.
NR 466.09(2)
(b).
(b) Demonstrate that each ink, coating,
varnish, adhesive, primer and other solids-containing material applied during
the month contains no more than 0.04 weight-fraction organic HAP, on a monthly
average as-applied basis, as determined in accordance with the following
procedures:
1. Determine the organic HAP
content of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent, diluent,
reducer, thinner and other material applied on an as-purchased basis in
accordance with s.
NR 466.09(2)
(b).
2. Calculate the monthly average as-applied
organic HAP content (Cahi) of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer and
other solids-containing material using Equation 3.
(c) Demonstrate that each ink, coating,
varnish, adhesive, primer and other solids-containing material applied,
contains no more than one of the following:
1.
0.04 weight-fraction organic HAP on a monthly average as-applied basis, when
determined in accordance with par. (b).
2. 0.20 kg (0.20 lb) of organic HAP per kg
(lb) of solids applied, on a monthly average as-applied basis, when determined
in accordance with the following procedures:
a. Determine the as-applied solids content
following the procedure in s.
NR 466.09(3)
(b) of all materials which do not meet the
requirements of subd.1.
b.
Calculate the monthly average as-applied solids content of materials which are
reduced, thinned or diluted prior to application, using Equation 4.
c.
Calculate the as-applied organic HAP to solids ratio, Hsi, for all materials
which do not meet the requirements of subd. 1., using Equation 5.
(d) Demonstrate that the monthly average
as-applied organic HAP content, HL, of all materials applied is less than 0.04
kg (0.04 lb) HAP per kg (lb) of material applied, using Equation 6.
(e)
Demonstrate that the monthly average as-applied organic HAP content, HS, is
less than 0.20 kg (0.20 lb) HAP per kg (lb) solids applied using Equation 7.
(f)
Demonstrate that the total monthly organic HAP applied, H, as determined using
Equation 8, is less than the calculated equivalent allowable organic HAP, Ha,
as determined under sub. (6).
(g)
Operate a capture system and control device and demonstrate an overall organic
HAP control efficiency of at least 95% for each month. If the affected source
operates more than one capture system or more than one control device, and has
only always-controlled work stations, the owner or operator shall demonstrate
compliance in accordance with the provisions of sub. (7) or (9). If the
affected source operates one or more never-controlled work stations or one or
more intermittently-controllable work stations, the owner or operator shall
demonstrate compliance in accordance with the provisions of sub. (7).
Otherwise, the owner or operator shall demonstrate compliance in accordance
with the procedure in sub. (4) when emissions from the affected source are
controlled by a solvent recovery device or the procedure in sub. (5) when
emissions are controlled by an oxidizer.
(h) Operate a capture system and control
device and limit the organic HAP emission rate to no more than 0.20 kg (0.20
lb) organic HAP emitted per kg (lb) solids applied as determined on a monthly
average as-applied basis. If the affected source operates more than one capture
system, more than one control device, one or more never-controlled work
stations, or one or more intermittently-controllable work stations, the owner
or operator shall demonstrate compliance in accordance with the provisions of
sub. (7). Otherwise, the owner or operator shall demonstrate compliance
following the procedure in sub. (4) when emissions from the affected source are
controlled by a solvent recovery device or the procedure in sub. (5) when
emissions are controlled by an oxidizer.
(i) Operate a capture system and control
device and limit the organic HAP emission rate to no more than 0.04 kg (0.04
lb) organic HAP emitted per kg (lb) material applied as determined on a monthly
average as-applied basis. If the affected source operates more than one capture
system, more than one control device, one or more never-controlled work
stations, or one or more intermittently-controllable work stations, then the
owner or operator shall demonstrate compliance in accordance with the
provisions of sub. (7). Otherwise, the owner or operator shall demonstrate
compliance following the procedure in sub. (4) when emissions from the affected
source are controlled by a solvent recovery device or the procedure in sub. (5)
when emissions are controlled by an oxidizer.
(j) Operate a capture system and control
device and limit the monthly organic HAP emissions to less than the allowable
emissions as calculated in accordance with sub. (6). If the affected source
operates more than one capture system, more than one control device, one or
more never-controlled work stations, or one or more intermittently-controllable
work stations, the owner or operator shall demonstrate compliance in accordance
with the provisions of sub. (7). Otherwise, the owner or operator shall
demonstrate compliance following the procedure in sub. (4) when emissions from
the affected source are controlled by a solvent recovery device or the
procedure in sub. (5) when emissions are controlled by an oxidizer.
(4) COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION FOR A SOLVENT RECOVERY DEVICE.
(a) To demonstrate
the overall organic HAP control efficiency required under sub. (3) (g), or the
organic HAP emission limitation requirements in sub. (3) (h) to (j), each owner
or operator using a solvent recovery device to control emissions shall do one
of the following:
1. Perform a liquid-liquid
material balance for each month according to the following procedures:
a. Measure the mass of each ink, coating,
varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied on the press or
group of presses controlled by a common solvent recovery device during the
month.
b. If demonstrating
compliance with sub. (2) (b), (c) or (d), determine the organic HAP content of
each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material
applied during the month following the procedure in s.
NR 466.09(2)
(b).
c. Determine the volatile matter content of
each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material
applied during the month following the procedure in s.
NR 466.09(3)
(b).
d. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2)
(c) or (d), determine the solids content of each ink, coating, varnish,
adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied during the month following
the procedure in s.
NR 466.09(3)
(b).
e. Install, calibrate, maintain and operate
according to the manufacturer's specifications, a device that indicates the
cumulative amount of volatile matter recovered by the solvent recovery device
on a monthly basis. The device shall be initially certified by the manufacturer
to be accurate to within + 2.0%.
f.
Measure the amount of volatile matter recovered for the month.
g. Calculate the volatile matter collection
and recovery efficiency, Rv, using Equation 9.
h. If
demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (b), (c) or (d), calculate the organic
HAP emitted during the month, H, using Equation 10.
i. If
demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (c), calculate the organic HAP emission
rate based on solids applied, L, using Equation 11.
j. If
demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (b), calculate the organic HAP emission
rate based on material applied, S, using Equation 12.
2. Conduct continuous emission monitoring of
the control device, conduct an initial performance test of capture efficiency,
and continuously monitor a site specific operating parameter to assure capture
efficiency according to the following procedures:
a. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2)
(b), (c) or (d), measure the mass of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive,
primer, solvent and other material applied on the press or group of presses
controlled by a common control device during the month.
b. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2)
(b), (c) or (d), determine the organic HAP content of each ink, coating,
varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied during the month
following the procedure in s.
NR 466.09(2)
(b).
c. Install continuous emission monitors to
determine the total organic volatile matter mass flow rate at both the inlet to
and the outlet from the control device, and calculate the percent efficiency
(E) of the control device for each month.
d. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2)
(c) or (d), determine the solids content of each ink, coating, varnish,
adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied during the month following
the procedure in s.
NR 466.09(3)
(b).
e. Install, calibrate, operate and maintain
the instrumentation necessary to measure continuously the site-specific
operating parameter established in accordance with s.
NR 466.10(6) whenever a product and
packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing press is
operated.
f. Determine the capture
efficiency (F) in accordance with s.
NR 466.09(5) and
(6).
g. Calculate the overall organic HAP control
efficiency, (R), achieved for each month using Equation 13.
h. If
demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (b), (c) or (d), calculate the organic
HAP emitted during the month, H, for each month using Equation 14.
i. If
demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (c), calculate the organic HAP emission
rate based on solids applied, L, using Equation 15.
j. If
demonstrating compliance with sub. (2) (b), calculate the organic HAP emission
rate based on material applied, S, using Equation 16.
(b)
1. Under
par. (a) 1., the affected source is in compliance with an emission limitation
if one of the following is satisfied:
a. The
organic volatile matter collection and recovery efficiency, Rv, is 95% or
greater.
b. The organic HAP
emission rate based on solids applied, L, is 0.20 kg (0.20 lb) organic HAP per
kg (lb) solids applied or less.
c.
The organic HAP emission rate based on material applied, S, is 0.04 kg (0.04
lb) organic HAP per kg (lb) material applied or less.
d. The organic HAP emitted during the month,
H, is less than the calculated allowable organic HAP, Ha, as determined using
sub. (6).
2. Under par.
(a) 2., the affected source is in compliance with an emission limitation if the
capture system operating parameter is operated at an average value greater than
or less than, as appropriate, the operating parameter value established in
accordance with s.
NR 466.10(6) for each 3 hour period, and
one of the following is satisfied:
a. The
organic volatile matter collection and recovery efficiency, Rv, is 95% or
greater.
b. The organic HAP
emission rate based on solids applied, L, is 0.20 kg (0.20 lb) organic HAP per
kg (lb) solids applied or less.
c.
The organic HAP emission rate based on material applied, S, is 0.04 kg (0.04
lb) organic HAP per kg (lb) material applied or less.
d. The organic HAP emitted during the month,
H, is less than the calculated allowable organic HAP, Ha, as determined using
sub. (6).
(5) COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION FOR AN OXIDIZER.
(a) To demonstrate the overall organic HAP
control efficiency required under sub. (3) (g) or the organic HAP emission
limitation requirements in sub. (3) (h) to (j), each owner or operator using an
oxidizer to control emissions shall do one of the following:
1. Conduct initial performance tests of
capture efficiency and control device efficiency and continuously monitor
capture system and control device operating parameters according to the
following procedures:
a. Determine the
oxidizer destruction efficiency (E) using the procedure in s.
NR 466.09(4).
b. Determine the capture system capture
efficiency (F) in accordance with s.
NR 466.09(5) and
(6).
c. Calculate the overall organic HAP control
efficiency, (R), achieved using Equation 13 in sub. (4) (a) 2. g.
d. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2)
(b), (c) or (d), measure the mass of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive,
primer, solvent and other material applied on the press or group of presses
controlled by a common solvent recovery device during the month.
e. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2)
(b), (c) or (d), determine the organic HAP content of each ink, coating,
varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied during the month
following the procedure in s.
NR 466.09(2)
(b).
f. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2)
(c) or (d), determine the solids content of each ink, coating, varnish,
adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied during the month following
the procedure in s.
NR 466.09(3)
(b).
g. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2)
(b), (c) or (d), calculate the organic HAP emitted during the month, H, for
each month using Equation 14 in sub. (4) (a) 2. h.
h. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2)
(c), calculate the organic HAP emission rate based on solids applied, L, for
each month using Equation 15 in sub. (4) (a) 2. i.
i. If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2)
(b), calculate the organic HAP emission rate based on material applied, S,
using Equation 16 in sub. (4) (a) 2. j.
j. Install, calibrate, operate and maintain
the instrumentation necessary to measure continuously the site-specific
operating parameters established in accordance with s.
NR 466.10(5) and
(6) whenever a product and packaging
rotogravure or wide-web flexographic press is operating.
2. Conduct continuous emission monitoring of
the control device, conduct an initial performance test of capture efficiency,
and continuously monitor a site specific operating parameter to assure capture
efficiency in accordance with the requirements in sub. (4) (a) 2.
(b)
1. Under par. (a) 1., the affected source is
in compliance with an emission limitation if the oxidizer is operated such that
the average operating parameter value is greater than the operating parameter
value established in accordance with s.
NR 466.10(5) for each 3-hour period, and
the capture system operating parameter is operated at an average value greater
than or less than, as appropriate, the operating parameter value established in
accordance with s.
NR 466.10(6) for each 3-hour period, and
one of the following is satisfied:
a. The
overall organic HAP control efficiency, R, is 95% or greater.
b. The organic HAP emission rate based on
solids applied, L, is 0.20 kg (0.20 lb) organic HAP per kg (lb) solids applied
or less.
c. The organic HAP
emission rate based on material applied, S, is 0.04 kg (0.04 lb) organic HAP
per kg (lb) material applied or less.
d. The organic HAP emitted during the month,
H, is less than the calculated allowable organic HAP, Ha, as determined using
sub. (6).
2. Under par.
(a) 2., the affected source is in compliance with an emission limitation if
sub. (4) (b) 2. is satisfied.
(6) CALCULATING MONTHLY ALLOWABLE HAP EMISSIONS (HA). Owners or operators shall calculate the monthly allowable HAP emissions, Ha, as required under sub. (3) (f), (4) (b) 1. d. or 2. d., or (5) (b) 1. d., according to the following procedures:
(a) Determine the as-purchased mass of each
ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer and other solids-containing material
applied each month, Mi.
(b)
Determine the as-purchased solids content of each ink, coating, varnish,
adhesive, primer and other solids-containing material applied each month, in
accordance with s.
NR 466.09(3)
(b), Csi.
(c) Determine the as-purchased mass fraction
of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer and other solids-containing
material which was applied at 20% by weight or greater solids content, on an
as-applied basis, Gi.
(d) Determine
the total mass of each solvent, diluent, thinner or reducer added to materials
which were applied at less than 20% by weight solids content, on an as-applied
basis, each month, MLj.
(e)
Calculate the monthly allowable HAP emissions, Ha, using Equation 17.
(7) OPERATING MORE THAN ONE CAPTURE SYSTEM OR CONTROL DEVICE, OR ONE OR MORE NEVER-CONTROLLED OR INTERMITTENTLY-CONTROLLABLE WORK STATIONS. This subsection applies to owners or operators of product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing presses operating more than one capture system, more than one control device, one or more never-controlled work stations, or one or more intermittently-controllable work stations.
(a) The owner or operator of each
solvent recovery system used to control one or more product and packaging
rotogravure or wide-web flexographic presses for which the owner or operator
chooses to perform a liquid-liquid material balance under sub. (4) (a) 1. shall
determine the organic HAP emissions for those presses controlled by that
solvent recovery system according to one of the following:
1. In accordance with sub. (4) (a) 1. a. to
c. and e. to h., if the presses controlled by that solvent recovery system have
only always-controlled work stations.
2. In accordance with subs. (4) (a) 1. b.,
c., e. and f. and (8), if the presses controlled by that solvent recovery
system have one or more never-controlled or intermittently-controllable work
stations.
(b) The owner
or operator of each solvent recovery system used to control one or more product
and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic presses, for which the owner
or operator chooses to conduct continuous emission monitoring of the control
device, conduct an initial test of capture efficiency, and continuously monitor
a site specific operating parameter to assure capture efficiency under sub. (4)
(a) 2., shall do both of the following:
1. For
each capture system delivering emissions to that solvent recovery system,
monitor an operating parameter established in accordance with s.
NR 466.10(6) to assure capture system
efficiency.
2. Determine the
organic HAP emissions for those presses served by each capture system
delivering emissions to that solvent recovery system according to one of the
following:
a. In accordance with sub. (4) (a)
2. a. to c. and e. to h., if the presses served by that capture system have
only always-controlled work stations.
b. In accordance with subs. (4) (a) 2. b., c.
and e. to g. and (8), if the presses served by that capture system have one or
more never-controlled or intermittently-controllable work stations.
(c) The owner or
operator of each oxidizer used to control emissions from one or more product
and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic presses, for which the owner
or operator chooses to conduct performance tests of capture efficiency and
control device efficiency and continuously monitor capture system and control
device operating parameters under sub. (5) (a) 1., shall do all of the
following:
1. Monitor an operating parameter
established in accordance with s.
NR 466.10(5) to assure control device
efficiency.
2. For each capture
system delivering emissions to that oxidizer, monitor an operating parameter
established in accordance with s.
NR 466.10(6) to assure capture
efficiency.
3. Determine the
organic HAP emissions for those presses served by each capture system
delivering emissions to that oxidizer according to one of the following:
a. In accordance with sub. (5) (a) 1. a. to
e. and g., if the presses served by that capture system have only
always-controlled work stations.
b.
In accordance with subs. (5) (a) 1. a. to c. and e. and (8), if the presses
served by that capture system have one or more never-controlled or
intermittently-controllable work stations.
(d) The owner or operator of each oxidizer
used to control emissions from one or more product and packaging rotogravure or
wide-web flexographic presses, for which the owner or operator chooses to
conduct continuous emission monitoring of the control device, conduct an
initial performance test of capture efficiency and continuously monitor a site
specific operating parameter to assure capture efficiency under sub. (5) (a)
2., shall do both of the following:
1. For
each capture system delivering emissions to that oxidizer, monitor an operating
parameter established in accordance with s.
NR 466.10(6) to assure capture
efficiency.
2. Determine the
organic HAP emissions for those presses served by each capture system
delivering emissions to that oxidizer according to one of the following:
a. In accordance with sub. (4) (a) 2. a. to
c. and e. to h., if the presses served by that capture system have only
always-controlled work stations.
b.
In accordance with subs. (4) (a) 2. b., c., e. to g. and (8), if the presses
served by that capture system have one or more never-controlled or
intermittently-controllable work stations.
(e) The owner or operator of one or more
uncontrolled product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic
printing presses shall determine the organic HAP applied on those presses using
Equation 8 in sub. (3) (f). For the purpose of a determination under this
paragraph, the organic HAP emitted from an uncontrolled press shall be
considered equal to the organic HAP applied on that press.
(f) If demonstrating compliance with sub. (2)
(c) or (d), the owner or operator shall determine the solids content of each
ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied
during the month following the procedure in s.
NR 466.09(3)
(b).
(g) The owner or operator shall determine the
organic HAP emissions for the affected source for the month by summing all
organic HAP emissions calculated according to pars. (a), (b) 2., (c) 3., (d) 2.
and (e).
(h) Under this
subsection, the affected source is in compliance for the month with an emission
limitation, if all operating parameters required to be monitored under pars.
(b) to (d), were maintained at the appropriate values, and one of the following
is satisfied:
1. The total mass of organic
HAP emitted by the affected source was not more than 4% of the total mass of
inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers, solvents, diluents, reducers,
thinners and other materials applied by the affected source.
2. The total mass of organic HAP emitted by
the affected source was not more than 20% of the total mass of solids applied
by the affected source.
3. The
total mass of organic HAP emitted by the affected source was not more than the
equivalent allowable organic HAP emissions for the affected source, Ha,
calculated in accordance with sub. (6).
4. The total mass of organic HAP emitted by
the affected source was not more than 5% of the total mass of organic HAP
applied by the affected source. The total mass of organic HAP applied by the
affected source in the month shall be determined by the owner or operator using
Equation 8 in sub. (3) (f).
(8) OPERATING NEVER-CONTROLLED OR INTERMITTENTLY CONTROLLABLE WORK STATIONS. Owners or operators determining organic HAP emissions from a press or group of presses having one or more never-controlled or intermittently-controllable work stations and using the procedures specified in sub. (7) (a) 2., (b) 2. b., (c) 3. b. or (d) 2. b., shall do the following for that press or group of presses:
(a) Determine the sum of the mass of all
inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers and other solids-containing
materials which are applied on intermittently-controllable work stations in
bypass mode and the mass of all inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers
and other solids-containing materials which are applied on never-controlled
work stations during the month, MBi.
(b) Determine the sum of the mass of all
solvents, reducers, thinners and other diluents which are applied on
intermittently-controllable work stations in bypass mode and the mass of all
solvents, reducers, thinners and other diluents which are applied on
never-controlled work stations during the month, MBj.
(c) Determine the sum of the mass of all
inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers and other solids-containing
materials which are applied on intermittently-controllable work stations in
controlled mode and the mass of all inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives,
primers and other solids-containing materials which are applied on
always-controlled work stations during the month, Mci.
(d) Determine the sum of the mass of all
solvents, reducers, thinners and other diluents which are applied on
intermittently-controllable work stations in controlled mode and the mass of
all solvents, reducers, thinners and other diluents which are applied on
always-controlled work stations during the month, MCj.
(e) For each press or group of presses for
which the owner or operator uses the provisions of sub. (7) (a) 2., calculate
the organic HAP emitted during the month using Equation 18.
(f) For
each press or group of presses for which the owner or operator uses the
provisions of sub. (7) (b) 2. b., (c) 3. b. or (d) 2. b., the owner or operator
shall calculate the organic HAP emitted during the month using Equation 19.
(9) OPERATING MORE THAN ONE CAPTURE SYSTEM OR CONTROL DEVICE AND NO NEVER-CONTROLLED AND NO INTERMITTENTLY CONTROLLABLE WORK STATIONS. If the owner or operator of an affected source operates more than one capture system or more than one control device, and has no never-controlled work stations and no intermittently-controllable work stations, the affected source is in compliance with the 95% overall organic HAP control efficiency requirement for the month if for each press or group of presses controlled by a common control device one of the following is satisfied:
(a) The organic volatile matter collection
and recovery efficiency, Rv, as determined by sub. (4) (a) 1. a., c. and e. to
g., is equal to or greater than 95%.
(b) The overall organic HAP control
efficiency as determined by sub. (4) (a) 2. c. and e. to g., for each press or
group of presses served by that control device and a common capture system, is
equal to or greater than 95% and the average capture system operating parameter
value for each capture system serving that control device is greater than or
less than, as appropriate, the operating parameter value established for that
capture system in accordance with s.
NR 466.10(6) for each 3-hour
period.
(c) The overall organic HAP
control efficiency as determined by sub. (5) (a) 1. a. to c. and j., for each
press or group of presses served by that control device and a common capture
system, is equal to or greater than 95%, the oxidizer is operated such that the
average operating parameter value is greater than the operating parameter value
established in accordance with s.
NR 466.10(5) for each 3-hour period, and
the average capture system operating parameter value for each capture system
serving that control device is greater than or less than, as appropriate, the
operating parameter value established for that capture system in accordance
with s.
NR 466.10(6) for each 3-hour period.
Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Wisconsin may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
