(1) APPLICABILITY.
(a) The department may not approve a proposed
facility, practice or activity at a location where a preventive action limit or
enforcement standard adopted under s.
NR 140.10 or has been 140.12 attained or exceeded unless
an exemption has been granted under this section.
(b) For an existing facility, practice or
activity, a response is required under s.
NR 140.24(2) or 140.26(2) when a
preventive action limit or an enforcement standard has been attained or
exceeded at a point of standards application unless an exemption has been
granted under this section or the criteria of s.
NR 140.24(5) (a) or (b) are
met.
(c) For an existing facility,
practice or activity that has taken or is taking a response under s.
NR 140.24(2) or 140.26(2), a
continued response is required unless a substance no longer attains or exceeds
a preventive action limit or an exemption has been granted under this
section.
(d) If a substance or
remedial material is to be infiltrated or injected into groundwater at a
concentration which attains or exceeds a preventive action limit, or at any
concentration for a substance or remedial material for which a groundwater
quality standard has not been established under this chapter, a temporary
exemption is required under sub. (5).
(2) CRITERIA FOR GRANTING EXEMPTIONS WHERE
THE BACKGROUND CONCENTRATION IS BELOW THE PREVENTIVE ACTION LIMIT.
(a) The department may grant an exemption
under this section to a facility, practice or activity which is regulated by
the department in an area where the background concentration of nitrate or a
substance of public welfare concern is below the preventive action limit if the
facility, practice or activity is designed and implemented to achieve the
lowest possible concentration for that substance which is technically and
economically feasible and the existing or anticipated increase in the
concentration of that substance does not present a threat to public health or
welfare.
(b) The department may
grant an exemption under this section to a facility, practice or activity which
is regulated by the department in an area where the background concentration of
a substance of public health concern, other than nitrate, is below the
preventive action limit for that substance if all of the following occur:
1. The measured or anticipated increase in
the concentration of the substance will be minimized to the extent technically
and economically feasible.
2.
Compliance with the preventive action limit is either not technically or
economically feasible.
3. The
enforcement standard for that substance will not be attained or exceeded at the
point of standards application.
4.
Any existing or projected increase in the concentration of the substance above
the background concentration does not present a threat to public health or
welfare.
Note: An exemption may be considered under this subsection
even if monitoring data indicates no detectable background concentration of the
substance.
(3) CRITERIA FOR GRANTING EXEMPTIONS WHERE
THE BACKGROUND CONCENTRATION IS ABOVE A PREVENTIVE ACTION LIMIT.
(a) The department may grant an exemption
under this section to a facility, practice or activity which is regulated by
the department in an area where the background concentration of nitrate or a
substance of public welfare concern attains or exceeds the preventive action
limit if the facility, practice or activity is designed to achieve the lowest
possible concentration for that substance which is technically and economically
feasible and the existing or anticipated increase in the concentration of the
substance does not present a threat to public health or welfare.
(b) The department may grant an exemption
under this section to a facility, practice or activity which is regulated by
the department in an area where the background concentration of a substance of
public health concern, other than nitrate, attains or exceeds a preventive
action limit for that substance:
1. If the
facility, practice or activity has not caused and will not cause the further
release of that substance into the environment; or
2. If the background concentration of the
substance does not exceed the enforcement standard for that substance, the
facility, practice or activity has not caused and will not cause the
concentration of the substance to exceed the enforcement standard for that
substance at a point of standards application and the facility, practice or
activity is designed to achieve the lowest possible concentration of that
substance which is technically and economically feasible.
(4) CRITERIA FOR GRANTING
EXEMPTIONS WHERE THE BACKGROUND CONCENTRATION IS ABOVE AN ENFORCEMENT STANDARD.
(a) The department may grant an exemption
under this section to a facility, practice or activity which is regulated by
the department in an area where the background concentration of nitrate or a
substance of public welfare concern attains or exceeds an enforcement standard
if the facility, practice or activity is designed to achieve the lowest
possible concentration for that substance which is technically and economically
feasible and the existing or anticipated increase in the concentration of the
substance does not present a threat to public health or welfare.
(b) The department may grant an exemption
under this section to a facility, practice or activity which is regulated by
the department in an area where the background concentration of a substance of
public health concern, other than nitrate, attains or exceeds the enforcement
standard for that substance if:
1. The
facility has not caused and will not cause the further release of that
substance into the environment; or
2.
a. The
facility is designed to achieve the lowest possible concentration of that
substance which is technically and economically feasible; and
b. The existing or anticipated increase in
the concentration of the substance has not caused or will not cause an
increased threat to public health or welfare; and
c. The existing or anticipated incremental
increase in the concentration of the substance by itself, has not exceeded or
will not exceed the preventive action limit.
(c) The department shall take action under s.
NR 140.26 if it determines that the increase in the
concentration of the substance causes an increased threat to public health or
welfare or it determines that the incremental increase in the concentration of
the substance, by itself, exceeds the preventive action limit.
(5) CRITERIA FOR GRANTING A
TEMPORARY EXEMPTION WHERE INFILTRATION OR INJECTION IS UTILIZED FOR A REMEDIAL
ACTION.
(a)
General. In lieu
of an exemption granted in compliance with the criteria in subs. (2) to (4),
the department may grant a temporary exemption if the criteria in this
subsection are complied with. This exemption applies to the owner or operator
of a facility, practice or activity that is undertaking a remedial action that:
includes the infiltration or injection of contaminated groundwater or remedial
material, has been approved by the department, and will comply with the
applicable response objectives under s.
NR 140.24 or within a 140.26 reasonable period of time.
The owner or operator of the facility, practice or activity may submit a
temporary exemption request to the department at the same time or after the
department has approved the remedial action.
(b)
Exemption request. The
owner or operator of the facility, practice or activity shall submit a request
for a temporary exemption to the department. As part of the request, the
applicant shall indicate how the exemption prerequisites under par. (c) and
applicable remedial design, operational and monitoring criteria under par. (d)
will be met.
Note: For most remedial actions, a microcosm or
treatability study, or other bench scale or pilot scale study will be required
by the department prior to consideration of an exemption for the full-scale
remedial action under this section. If a pilot scale study is deemed necessary
before an exemption for a full-scale remedial action can be granted, a separate
temporary exemption issued under this section is required before the pilot
scale study can begin.
(c)
Exemption prerequisites. As part of the temporary exemption
request, the owner or operator shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
department that all of the following requirements will be met:
1. The remedial action for restoring
contaminated soil or groundwater, and any infiltrated or injected contaminated
water and remedial material, shall achieve the applicable response objectives
required by s.
NR 140.24(2) or 140.26(2) within a
reasonable period of time.
2. The
type, concentration and volume of substances or remedial material to be
infiltrated or injected shall be minimized to the extent that is necessary for
restoration of the contaminated soil or groundwater and be approved by the
department prior to use.
3. Any
infiltration or injection of contaminated water or remedial material into soil
or groundwater will not significantly increase the threat to public health or
welfare.
4. No uncontaminated or
contaminated water, substance or remedial material will be infiltrated or
injected into an area where a floating non-aqueous phase liquid is present in
the contaminated soil or groundwater.
5. There will be no expansion of soil or
groundwater contamination, or migration of any infiltrated or injected
contaminated water or remedial material, beyond the edges of previously
contaminated areas, except that infiltration or injection into previously
uncontaminated areas may be allowed if the department determines that expansion
into adjacent, previously uncontaminated areas is necessary for the restoration
of the contaminated soil or groundwater, and the requirements of subd. 1. will
be met.
6. All necessary federal,
state and local licenses, permits and other approvals are obtained and all
applicable environmental protection requirements will be complied with.
Note: The issuance of a wastewater discharge permit by the
department is required prior to the infiltration or injection of substances or
remedial material into unsaturated soil or groundwater for discharges, as
defined by s.
283.01(4),
Stats. A wastewater discharge permit establishes the effluent or injection
limits for substances or remedial material which may be infiltrated or injected
into unsaturated soil or groundwater. A temporary exemption granted under this
subsection applies to substances or remedial material which may enter
groundwater or may be detected at a point of standards applications; it does
not apply to substances or remedial material infiltrated or injected into
unsaturated soil.
(d)
Remedial action design, operation
and monitoring criteria. In addition to providing information on how
the requirements under par. (c) will be met, the application shall specify the
following information where applicable.
1.
The remedial action design, operation and soil and groundwater monitoring
procedures to insure compliance with the requirements under par. (c) and
applicable criteria under this paragraph.
2. The level of pre-treatment for
contaminated groundwater prior to reinfiltration or reinjection.
3. The types and concentrations of substances
or remedial material being proposed for infiltration or injection.
4. The volume and rate of infiltration or
injection of contaminated groundwater or remedial material.
5. The location where the contaminated
groundwater or remedial material will be infiltrated or injected.
(e)
Granting an
exemption. The department may only grant a temporary exemption under
this subsection at the same time or after the department has approved the
remedial action. When the department grants an exemption under this subsection,
it shall follow the exemption procedures included in sub. (6) and shall require
the owner or operator of the facility, practice or activity to comply with the
requirements and criteria in pars. (c) and (d). The temporary exemption shall
also include:
1. The expiration date of the
temporary exemption. The expiration date shall be selected to achieve the
applicable response objectives required by s.
NR 140.24(2) or 140.26(2) within a
reasonable period of time, not to exceed 5 years from the effective date of the
exemption. The temporary exemption may be reissued following a department
review of information documenting the performance of the remedial action and a
successful demonstration that reissuance of the exemption is necessary to
achieve the response objectives required by s.
NR 140.24(2) or 140.26(2).necessary
relating to the temporary exemption.
(f)
Responses to exemption
violations. If the department determines that the conditions or
requirements specified in the temporary exemption are not being met, the
department may:
1. Require that the owner or
operator of the facility, practice or activity revise the remedial action
design, operation or monitoring procedures in accordance with par. (d). All
revisions shall comply with the requirements established under pars. (c) and
(e) and may require approval from the department prior to implementation.
2. Revoke the exemption and
require implementation of an alternate remedial action to restore soil or
groundwater quality.
(6),EXEMPTION PROCEDURES. If the department
grants an exemption under this section for a substance or a remedial material,
it shall specify:
(a) The substance or
remedial material to which the exemption applies;
(b) The terms and conditions of the
exemption, which may include an alternative concentration limit, under which
the department may seek a response under s.
NR 140.24 or relating 140.26 to the substance or remedial
material; and
(c) Any other
conditions relating to the exemption.