Current through August 26, 2024
For the purposes of this section, furbearers are muskrat,
mink, weasel, beaver, fisher, otter, skunk, raccoon, fox, coyote, bobcat and
opossum. The furbearer management program has the following essential needs and
actions:
(1) HABITAT MANAGEMENT.
(a) Wetlands are the primary habitat
component for many furbearers so the actions regarding wetland protection and
management stated in s.
NR 1.12(1) are reemphasized in relation
to furbearers.
(b) The capacity to
produce furbearers on lands and waters under the management and control of the
department can be increased through more intensive management of suitable
habitat. Generally, management activities designed to improve furbearer
populations are compatible with management for other species of wildlife. In
certain situations, populations of furbearers such as fox, raccoon, coyotes and
skunks can depress the population of other game species. Management activities
on department lands should be designed to achieve a desirable balance between
predator and prey species which is consistent with goals and objectives
established in the course of developing master plans for state
properties.
(c) Since the majority
of furbearers depend upon habitat under the control of private landowners,
management information will be provided to private landowners requesting it.
Incentive programs to encourage habitat preservation and management on private
lands will be developed where they are feasible.
(2) HARVEST. Furbearers are significant from
an ecological, biological, recreational, cultural and economic standpoint.
Management efforts will assure their future in suitable natural ecosystems and
harvest regulations will be designed to make optimum use of these species for
these purposes.
(a) Every effort shall be
made to design regulations on as uniform a basis as possible that will still
maintain desirable population levels from year to year. Best management
practices that include cultural, ecological and biological objectives shall be
accorded primary consideration in the management of furbearer populations and
the establishment of harvest regulations.
(b) Because of the cultural, economic,
recreational and public service value of the furbearer harvest, present
trapping methods and techniques must continue. However, efforts to develop best
management practices for trapping that would improve humaneness, selectivity,
efficiency, effectiveness and safety will be encouraged.
(3) STOCKING. Stocking of furbearers is
restricted to the trapping and relocation of certain species to effect planned
range extension or introductions.
(4) DAMAGE.
(a) All of these species are capable of
causing economic damage. Section
29.885,
Stats., provides a procedure for dealing with wild animals causing damage to
private property. Desired population levels of furbearers and hunted carnivores
will be maintained primarily by the use of general public hunting and trapping
seasons. Control of damage through the issuance of permits to the complainant
shall be the next step employed to control problem animals. Direct control by
the department shall be employed only where other control methods are not
feasible or effective.
(b) In
addition to the above, beaver activities can harm trout habitat and lowland
forest stands but at the same time can benefit the habitat of other wildlife
species. Beaver reduction and management programs shall be based on the
following guidelines:
1. In all areas
containing class I trout waters or productive lowland coniferous stands, a
program to keep beaver populations at low levels that do not adversely affect
these resources shall be conducted;
2. On reaches of other trout streams, where
it is clearly demonstrated that beaver activity is deleterious to water quality
or trout habitat, beaver populations shall be kept at sufficiently low levels
to protect these resources;
3. In
all other areas, beaver shall be managed to produce populations that will
provide sustained annual harvest.