Big game mammals in Wisconsin are white-tailed deer, black
bear and elk. The needs and actions specified in this section are essential to
an effective big game management program.
(1) HABITAT MANAGEMENT. The natural growth
and changing composition of forest stands, particularly in the north, is
causing a long-term decline in habitat quality for big game and other forest
wildlife.
(a)
Forest
diversity. A planned program of maintaining forest diversity including
shade-intolerant cover types, particularly aspen, oak and forest openings, is
required to slow or halt this decline in habitat quality and to maintain deer
populations at established population objectives.
(b)
Summer range. Habitat
conditions are deteriorating most rapidly on summer deer range. Forest
maturation, conversion from sun-loving tree species to shade tolerant species
and loss of grassy openings are reducing the quality of summer deer range and
with it, the deer carrying capacity in northern Wisconsin. The habitat
management objective is to provide an adequate mixture of aspen, oak, upland
brush, jack pine and sodded openings in connection with regular forest
management practices.
(c)
Winter range. Winter habitat may be increasing as a result of
expanding coniferous cover and implementation of deer yard plans on public
lands. However, winter deer survival is largely dependent on fat acquired on
the summer range. Deer have evolved physiologically and behaviorally to survive
in northern forest habitats under average winter conditions. Occasional severe
winters will result in deer mortality. These periodic losses are considered
normal for northern deer and will occur irrespective of winter habitat quality.
Severe deer losses can be mitigated most effectively by maintaining quality
summer habitat. Direct feeding of hay, corn or other agricultural crops is
seldom effective and even detrimental if not introduced gradually over time.
While browse cutting does provide natural feed, it is largely ineffective.
Specially formulated feed in pelletized form has been demonstrated to benefit
malnourished deer. However, the cost and logistics of feeding enough deer to
produce a measurable result in subsequent years precludes feeding as normal
public policy. The department recognizes public concern for malnourished deer,
public desire to feed stressed deer regardless of cost or measurable results
and the benefits to individual animals which are properly fed. Therefore, the
following policy is adopted for wintering deer in the northern forest.
1. The department will seek appropriate deer
harvest quotas to move deer populations in the direction specified by deer
population objectives.
2. Habitat
management will emphasize maintaining summer range quality which will produce
well nourished deer in the fall and enhance their overwinter
survival.
3. The department will
monitor wintering deer herds by surveying yarding areas and measuring winter
severity.
4. The department will
implement existing deer yard plans to maximize browse and perpetuate priority
cover.
5. The department will
provide technical advice and guidance to individuals and groups on where, when,
what and how to feed privately acquired food to deer during severe
winters.
(2)
HARVEST. Big game hunting regulations shall be designed to meet the following
objectives:
(a)
Deer population
objectives. The department shall seek to maintain a deer herd in
balance with its range and with deer population and sustainable harvest
objectives that are reasonably compatible with social, economic and ecosystem
management objectives for each deer management unit. Deer population objectives
are to be based on:
1. Carrying capacity as
determined by unit population responses to habitat quality and historical
records of winter severity.
2.
Hunter success in harvesting and seeing deer and public deer viewing
opportunities.
3. Ecological and
economic impacts of deer browsing.
4. Disease transmission.
5. Concern for deer-vehicle
collisions.
6. Chippewa treaty
harvest.
7. Hunter access to land
in a deer management unit.
8.
Ability to manage the deer herd in a management unit towards an established
population objective.
9. Tolerable
levels of deer damage as described in par. (am).
(am)
Tolerable levels of deer damage
to crops. Deer damage to crops in a deer management unit exceeds
tolerable levels when the crop damage is greater than 2.5 times the median in 2
of the following 4 indicators:
1. Appraised
deer damage losses determined through the wildlife damage program under s.
29.889,
Stats., per 100 overwinter deer.
2.
Appraised deer damage losses determined through the wildlife damage program
under s.
29.889,
Stats., per square mile of land in the deer management unit.
3. Appraised deer damage losses determined
through the wildlife damage program under s.
29.889,
Stats., per square mile of agricultural land in the deer management
unit.
4. Number of claims for deer
damage submitted through the wildlife damage program under s.
29.889,
Stats., per 100 square miles of total land.
Note The crop damage data used for these
evaluations are adjusted to omit damage losses to high valued crops such as
cranberry, orchard, Christmas tree, truck farm crops, etc. where low deer
numbers can still cause high losses, and where effective abatement is available
in the form of 8 foot high deer barrier, high tensile woven wire fences. The
focus of the "tolerable levels" criteria is on chronic damage losses caused by
high deer populations.
(at) If crop damage in a deer management unit
with an objective to maintain or increase the population is above the tolerable
limit in 2 years out of a 3 year period prior to a unit review under s.
NR 10.104(3), the department shall
consider establishing an objective to reduce or maintain the deer
population.
(b)
Hunting
objectives. Achieving and maintaining opportunities for a range of
deer hunting experience while still allowing to the extent possible, freedom of
choice by hunters. Regulations should provide incentives or disincentives to
encourage better distribution of hunting pressure. If hunter numbers continue
to increase, control of hunting pressure may become necessary.
(c)
Black bear. Maintaining
the black bear as a trophy big game animal and offering the best opportunity
for a quality hunting experience. In addition, the maintenance of a quality
hunt will be emphasized by continuing controls over the use of bait and
dogs.
(d)
Animal
damage. Deer, bear and elk damage complaints will be handled according
to the provisions of s.
29.889,
Stats., and rules as published in the Wisconsin administrative code. Damage can
be most economically controlled by maintaining populations with a hunting
season harvest as specified in par. (a).
(e)
Elk. Maintaining elk as
a big game animal and offering the best opportunity for a once-in-a-lifetime,
quality hunting experience. In addition, the maintenance of elk as a valued
component of the natural community will be emphasized by continued
management.
(3) RESEARCH
AND SURVEYS. Surveys, investigations and research shall be conducted to provide
technical information necessary to evaluate population objectives and establish
population trends, harvest recommendations, population objectives and habitat
management needs and guidelines.