Wisconsin Administrative Code
Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection
ATCP 55-89 - Food, Lodging, and Recreation Safety
Chapter ATCP 75 - Retail Food Establishments
Subchapter III - Enforcement and Appeals
Section ATCP 75.10 - Enforcement
Universal Citation: WI Admin Code ยง ATCP 75.10
Current through August 26, 2024
(1) INSPECTIONS AND ACCESS TO THE PREMISES.
(a)
Inspections. Under s. 97.12(1)
Stats., for the purpose of enforcing this chapter, the department and its
agents may, at reasonable hours, enter and inspect any premises for which a
license is required under this chapter or any farm, factory, warehouse,
building, room, establishment or place at or in which foods are manufactured,
processed, packed, packaged, stored or held for sale, and may enter any
vehicle, including a vehicle used to transport or hold foods in commerce. The
department and its agents may also secure samples or specimens, including
samples or specimens of food and any product or substance that may affect food,
examine and copy relevant documents and records, and obtain photographic and
other evidence needed to enforce this chapter or a rule promulgated under this
chapter. The department shall examine any samples secured and shall conduct
other inspections and examinations needed to determine whether there is a
violation of this chapter. The department shall pay or offer to pay the market
value of samples taken.
(b)
Reinspections. The department or its agent may reinspect a
retail food establishment whenever an inspection or the investigation of a
complaint reveals the existence of a violation that is potentially hazardous to
the health and welfare of patrons or employees of the retail food
establishment. The time between an inspection, investigation, and a
reinspection shall be sufficient to allow the license holder time to correct
the deficiencies. The department shall charge a reinspection fee, according to
s.
ATCP 75.08 Table B or
the applicable charges as determined by an agent. If an additional reinspection
is required because the license holder has not corrected a violation, the
department shall assess the license holder an additional reinspection fee
according to s.
ATCP 75.08 Table B,
or the applicable charges as determined by an agent. The department may order
the license holder to show just cause why the license should not be suspended
or revoked under s.
ATCP 75.12.
(2) GENERAL ORDERS TO CORRECT VIOLATIONS.
(a) If upon inspection of a retail food
establishment, the department or agent finds that the retail food establishment
is not designed, constructed, equipped or operated as required under ch. 97
Stat., ch. ATCP 75 or ch. ATCP 75 Appendix, the department or agent shall issue
a written order to correct the violation. The order shall specify the
correction needed for compliance and the deadline by which the license holder
shall make the correction. The department or agent, at its discretion, may
extend the deadline specified in the order.
(b) f the license holder does not make the
corrections to the violations by the deadline stated in the order, or any
extension of time granted for compliance, the department or agent may issue an
order under s.
ATCP 75.12
to suspend or revoke the license to operate the retail food
establishment.
(c) Under s.
97.12(5),
Stats., any person who fails to comply with an order of the department shall
forfeit $50 for each day of noncompliance after the order is served upon or
directed to the person. A person may appeal a forfeiture under s. ATCP 75.14.
(3) HOLD ORDERS. As specified under s. 97.12(2), Stats.:
(a) Whenever any duly authorized
inspector of the department has reasonable cause to believe that any food
examined by him or her is adulterated or misbranded and is dangerous to health
or misleading to the injury or damage of the purchaser or consumer, the
inspector shall issue and deliver to the owner or custodian of the food a
holding order prohibiting the sale or movement of the food for any purpose
until the analysis or examination of the sample obtained has been completed. A
holding order may be effective for a period of no longer than 14 days from the
time of its delivery and it may be reissued for one additional 14-day period if
necessary to complete the analysis or examination of the food.
(b) No food described in a holding order
issued and delivered under par. (a) may be sold or moved for any purpose
without the approval of the department until such analysis or examination has
been completed within the time specified in par. (a). Upon completion of the
analysis or examination either of the following may apply:
1. If the department upon completed analysis
or examination determines that the food described in such holding order is not
adulterated or misbranded, then the owner or custodian thereof shall be
promptly notified in writing, and such holding order shall terminate upon
notification.
2. Where the analysis
or examination shows that the food is adulterated or misbranded and is
dangerous to health or misleading to the injury or damage of the purchaser or
consumer, the owner or custodian of the food shall be notified in writing
within the effective time of the holding order. Such notice has the effect of a
special order issued under s. 93.18,
Stats. Upon receipt of a notice, the food subject to the holding order may not
be sold, moved, disposed of or brought into compliance with applicable
standards without the approval of the department. If such food is not brought
into compliance, sold, moved, or disposed of within 30 days, or other agreed
upon period of time, from the date the owner or custodian received notice that
the food was adulterated or misbranded, the department may issue an order
directing the disposition of the food. Such an order has the effect of a
special order issued under s.
93.18,
Stats.
(c) Any person
violating an order issued under this subsection may be fined not more than the
maximum amount or imprisoned not more than one year in the county jail or both.
The maximum fine under this paragraph equals $10,000 plus the retail value of
the product moved, sold, or disposed of in violation of the order issued under
this subsection.
(4) SPECIAL ORDERS AND ORDERS TO ABATE A DANGER TO PUBLIC HEALTH. As specified under s. 97.12(3), Stats.:
(a) The department may issue a
special order as provided under s.
93.18 Stats., to any person engaged in the production, processing, sale, or
distribution of food if the department finds a violation of this chapter or the
rules promulgated under this chapter. An order shall state the violations found
and shall specify a deadline for correction.
(b) If the department finds that a piece of
equipment, a facility, or a practice used is a danger to public health, it may
order that the situation be abated or eliminated immediately and that the
equipment, facility or practice not be used until the violation is corrected
and the correction is confirmed by the department. The department may, instead
of issuing an order, accept written agreements of voluntary compliance, which
have the effect of an order.
Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Wisconsin may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.