West Virginia Code of State Rules
Agency 77 - Human Rights Commission
Title 77 - LEGISLATIVE RULE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
Series 77-03 - Rules Regarding Religious Discrimination
Section 77-3-3 - Employment Discrimination Prohibited; Obligation to Make Reasonable Accommodations
Current through Register Vol. XLI, No. 13, March 29, 2024
3.1. No employer shall, on the basis of religion, discriminate against an individual concerning the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment unless it can be shown that the employer cannot reasonably accommodate an employee's or a prospective employee's religious observance or practice without undue hardship on the conduct of its business.
3.2. The duty not to discriminate on religious grounds includes an obligation on the part of the employer, and/or a labor organization, if applicable, to make reasonable accommodations to the religious needs of employees and prospective employees where such accommodations can be made without undue hardship to the conduct of the employer's business, provided that the employee or prospective employee has notified the employer or labor organization of his or her need for a religious accommodation or the employer or labor organization has otherwise obtained knowledge of the need for such an accommodation.
3.3. It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer to refuse to hire an applicant for employment or to discharge an employee who regularly observes Friday evening and Saturday, or some other day of the week, as the Sabbath or who observes certain special religious holidays during the year and, as as a consequence, does not work on such days, unless the employer can prove that there exists no reasonable accommodation of such religious needs or that such accommodations can only be made at the price of undue hardship.
3.4. The following subsections contain several suggested alternatives that may be used in attempting to accommodate the religious practices of employees or prospective employees. These suggested alternatives are not intended to be all inclusive as different factual circumstances surrounding the need for religious accommodation may require different solutions.
3.5. A refusal to accommodate is justified only when an employer or labor organization, when applicable, can demonstrate that an undue hardship would in fact result from each available alternative method of accommodation. The employer of labor organization, when applicable, shall have the burden of showing that it took affirmative steps to attempt to reasonably accommodate an employee or prospective employees.
3.6. When more than one means of accommodation would not cause undue hardship, the employer must offer the alternative that least disadvantages the employee with respect to his/her employment opportunities. The employer or labor organization satisfies its duty to an employee or prospective employee once it offers all reasonable means of accommodation without undue hardship. An employee who fails to cooperate or accept accommodation may subject himself or herself to adverse or disciplinary action by the employer or labor organization where all reasonable accommodation without undue hardship has been offered.
3.7. The Commission will determine what constitutes more than a de minimis cost with due regard given to the identifiable cost in relation to the size and operating cost of the employer and the number of individuals who will require a particular accommodation. Generally, a regular cost, such as the continual payment of a premium wage to a substitute, will constitute undue hardship. However, the infrequent or temporary payment of premium wages to a substitute while a more permanent arrangement is being sought are costs that the employer will usually be required to bear. Administrative costs of rearranging schedules or duty rosters will generally not constitute more than de minimis costs.
3.8. A mere assumption that many more people, with the same or similar religious practices as the person being accommodated, may also need accommodation, is not evidence of undue hardship.
3.9. Undue hardship may be shown where a variance from a bona fide seniority system is necessary in order to accommodate an employee's religious practices and doing so would deny another employee his or her job or shift preference guaranteed by that system. Arrangements for voluntary substitutes and swaps do not constitute an undue hardship to the extent the arrangements do not violate a bona fide seniority system. Nothing in these rules precludes an employer and a union from including arrangements for voluntary substitutes and swaps as part of a collective bargaining agreement.
3.10. An employer must accommodate an employee who refuses to perform certain tasks because of his/her religion unless those tasks are an essential function of the employee's position or cannot be reasonably reassigned to another employee.
3.11. An employer must accommodate an employee who refuses to comply with a dress or appearance code for religious reasons unless it can demonstrate that this refusal would violate an established health or safety code. A need of the employer to maintain a certain public image will not amount to undue hardship unless the employer can show that accommodation would have a detrimental impact on its business.