Washington Administrative Code
Title 192 - Employment Security Department
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
Chapter 192-350 - Transfer of business
Section 192-350-110 - What elements must the department prove to establish "SUTA dumping"?
Current through Register Vol. 24-18, September 15, 2024
(1) In order to prove SUTA dumping, the department must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that:
(2) A "significant purpose" must be more than an incidental purpose, but may be one of many purposes. The department may show that a significant purpose for the transfer was to obtain a lower tax rate by factors such as:
(3) For additional penalties under RCW 50.29.063(2) or (3), the department must also prove that an employer intended to knowingly evade or knowingly evaded successorship provisions or that a nonemployer knowingly promoted the evasion of successorship provisions. "Knowingly" means having actual knowledge or acting with deliberate ignorance or reckless disregard for the prohibitions. "Knowingly" includes an intent to evade, misrepresentation, or willful nondisclosure.
Statutory Authority: RCW 50.12.010, 50.12.040, and 50.29.064. 07-23-131, § 192-350-110, filed 11/21/07, effective 1/1/08.