Current through Register Vol. 41, No. 3, September 23, 2024
A. The provisions
governing monitoring shall be as follows:
1.
With regard to the emissions standards in
9VAC5-40-6670 A,
9VAC5-40-6680, and
9VAC5-40-6690, the provisions of
9VAC5-40-40(Monitoring)
apply.
2. With regard to the
emission limits in
9VAC5-40-6570 through
9VAC5-40-6660 and
9VAC5-40-6670 B, the following
provisions apply:
a.9VAC5-40-40 A and F;
b.
40 CFR
60.13; and
c. Subsections B through L of this
section.
B.
Continuous emission monitoring systems for gaseous pollutants shall be
installed as follows.
1. Each affected
municipal waste combustion unit shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate
continuous emission monitoring systems for oxygen (or carbon dioxide), sulfur
dioxide, and carbon monoxide. Class I municipal waste combustion units shall
also install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous emission monitoring
system for nitrogen oxides. The continuous emission monitoring systems for
sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and oxygen (or carbon dioxide) shall be
installed at the outlet of the air pollution control device.
2. Each continuous emission monitoring system
shall be installed, evaluated, and operated according to the monitoring
requirements in 40 CFR
60.13.
3. The oxygen (or carbon dioxide)
concentration shall be monitored at each location where sulfur dioxide and
carbon monoxide are monitored. Class I units shall also monitor the oxygen (or
carbon dioxide) concentration at the location where nitrogen oxides are
monitored.
4. Carbon dioxide may be
monitored instead of oxygen as a diluent gas. If carbon dioxide is monitored,
then an oxygen monitor is not required and the requirements in
9VAC5-40-6750 F shall be
met.
5. If compliance is
demonstrated by monitoring the percent reduction of sulfur dioxide, continuous
emission monitoring systems for sulfur dioxide and oxygen (or carbon dioxide)
shall be installed at the inlet of the air pollution control device.
6. If an alternative sulfur dioxide
monitoring method is used, such as parametric monitoring, or if the source
cannot monitor emissions at the inlet of the air pollution control device to
determine percent reduction, an alternative monitoring method may be used on
approval of the board under 40 CFR
60.13(i).
C. Continuous emission monitoring
systems shall be operated as follows.
1.
Initial, daily, quarterly, and annual evaluations of the continuous emission
monitoring systems that measure oxygen (or carbon dioxide), sulfur dioxide,
nitrogen oxides (Class I units only), and carbon monoxide shall be
conducted.
2. The initial
evaluation of the continuous emission monitoring systems shall be completed
within 180 days after the final compliance date specified in
9VAC5-40-6710 A.
3. For initial and annual evaluations, data
shall be collected concurrently (or within 30 to 60 minutes) using the oxygen
(or carbon dioxide) continuous emission monitoring system, the sulfur dioxide,
nitrogen oxides, or carbon monoxide continuous emission monitoring systems, as
appropriate, using the following test methods:
a. For nitrogen oxides as monitored by Class
I units, the pollutant concentration levels shall be validated using Reference
Method 7, 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D, or 7E; oxygen (or carbon monoxide) shall be measured
using Reference Method 3 or 3A.
b.
For sulfur dioxide, the pollutant concentration levels shall be validated using
Reference Method 6 or 6C; oxygen (or carbon monoxide) shall be measured using
Reference Method 3 or 3A.
c. For
carbon monoxide, the pollutant concentration levels shall be validated using
Reference Method 10, 10A, or 10B; oxygen (or carbon monoxide) shall be measured
using Reference Method 3 or 3A.
4. Data shall be collected during each
initial and annual evaluation of the continuous emission monitoring systems as
follows.
a. For opacity: the span value shall
be 100%, and Performance Specification 1 shall be used. Reference Method 9
shall be used if needed to meet minimum data requirements.
b. For nitrogen oxides as monitored by Class
I units: the span value for the control device outlet shall be 125% of the
maximum expected hourly potential nitrogen oxides emissions of the municipal
waste combustion unit, and Performance Standard 2 shall be used. Reference
Method 7E shall be used if needed to meet minimum data requirements.
c. For sulfur dioxide:
(1) For the inlet to the control device: the
span value shall be 125% of the maximum expected hourly potential sulfur
dioxide emissions of the municipal waste combustion unit, and Performance
Standard 2 shall be used. Reference Method 6C shall be used if needed to meet
minimum data requirements.
(2) For
the control device outlet: the span value shall be 50% of the maximum expected
hourly potential sulfur dioxide emissions of the municipal waste combustion
unit, and Performance Standard 2 shall be used. Reference Method 6C shall be
used if needed to meet minimum data requirements.
d. For carbon monoxide: the span value shall
be 125% of the maximum expected hourly potential carbon monoxide emissions of
the municipal waste combustion unit, and Performance Specification 4A shall be
used. Reference Method 10 with alternative interference trap shall be used if
needed to meet minimum data requirements.
e. For oxygen or carbon dioxide: the span
value shall be 25% oxygen or 25% carbon dioxide, and Performance Specification
3 shall be used. Reference Method 3A or 3B shall be used if needed to meet
minimum data requirements.
5. The quality assurance procedures in
Procedure 1 of appendix F of 40 CFR Part 60 shall be followed for each
continuous emission monitoring system.
D. The accuracy tests for the sulfur dioxide
continuous emission monitoring system require evaluation of the oxygen (or
carbon dioxide) continuous emission monitoring system. Therefore, the oxygen
(or carbon dioxide) continuous emission monitoring system is exempt from
Section 2.3 of Performance Specification 3 in appendix B of 40 CFR Part 60
(relative accuracy requirement) and Section 5.1.1 of appendix F of 40 CFR Part
60 (relative accuracy test audit).
E. The following schedule for evaluating
continuous emission monitoring systems shall be met.
1. Annual evaluations of the continuous
emission monitoring systems shall be conducted no more than 13 months after the
previous evaluation was conducted.
2. Continuous emission monitoring systems
shall be evaluated daily and quarterly as specified in appendix F of 40 CFR
Part 60.
F. The
relationship between oxygen and carbon dioxide shall be established during the
initial evaluation of the continuous emission monitoring systems, and may be
reestablished during annual evaluations. The relationship shall be established
as follows.
1. Reference Method 3A or 3B
shall be used to determine oxygen concentration at the location of the carbon
dioxide monitor.
2. At least three
test runs for oxygen shall be conducted. Each test run shall represent a
one-hour average, and sampling shall continue for at least 30 minutes in each
hour.
3. The fuel-factor equation
in Reference Method 3B shall be used to determine the relationship between
oxygen and carbon dioxide.
G. The following monitoring data shall be
collected.
1. Where continuous emission
monitoring systems are required, one-hour arithmetic averages shall be
obtained. The averages for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides (Class I units
only), and carbon monoxide shall be in parts per million by dry volume at 7.0%
oxygen (or the equivalent carbon dioxide level). The one-hour averages of
oxygen (or carbon dioxide) data from the continuous emission monitoring system
shall be used to determine the actual oxygen (or carbon dioxide) level and to
calculate emissions at 7.0% oxygen (or the equivalent carbon dioxide
level).
2. At least two data points
per hour shall be obtained in order to calculate a valid one-hour arithmetic
average. 40 CFR
60.13(e)(2) requires the
continuous emission monitoring systems to complete at least one cycle of
operation (sampling, analyzing, and data recording) for each 15-minute
period.
3. Valid one-hour averages
shall be obtained for 75% of the operating hours per day for 90% of the
operating days per calendar quarter. An operating day is any day the unit
combusts any municipal solid waste or refuse-derived fuel.
4. Failure to obtain the minimum data
required in subdivisions G 1 through 3 of this section constitutes a violation
of the data collection requirement regardless of the emission level monitored.
In such case the board shall be notified according to
9VAC5-40-6770 B 2 e.
5. If the minimum data required in
subdivisions G 1 through 3 of this section is not obtained, the owner shall
nevertheless use all valid data from the continuous emission monitoring systems
in calculating emission concentrations and percent reductions in accordance
with subsection H of this section.
H. One-hour arithmetic averages shall be
converted into averaging times and units as follows.
1. Emissions shall be calculated at 7.0%
oxygen using the following equation:
C7%=Cunc*(13.9)*(1/(20.9-CO2))
where:
C7% = concentration corrected to
7.0% oxygen.
Cunc = uncorrected pollutant
concentration.
CO2 = concentration of oxygen
(percent).
2. Reference
Method 19 shall be used to calculate the daily geometric average concentrations
of sulfur dioxide emissions. Owners monitoring the percent reduction of sulfur
dioxide shall use Reference Method 19 to determine the daily geometric average
percent reduction of potential sulfur dioxide emissions.
3. Class I units shall use Reference Method
19 to calculate the daily arithmetic average for concentrations of nitrogen
oxides.
4. Reference Method 19
shall be used to calculate the four-hour or 24-hour daily block averages (as
applicable) for concentrations of carbon monoxide.
I. Operating parameters required for
continuous monitoring are as follows.
1.
Municipal waste combustion unit load shall be monitored as follows:
a. Municipal waste combustion units that
generate steam shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a steam
flowmeter or a feed water flowmeter as follows.
(1) The measurements of steam (or feed water)
shall be continuously measured and recorded in kilograms (or pounds) per
hour.
(2) The steam (or feed water)
flow shall be calculated in four-hour block averages.
(3) The steam (or feed water) flow rate shall
be calculated using the method in "American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Power Test Codes: Test Code for Steam Generating Units, Power Test Code
4.1-1964 (R1991)," section 4 (see
9VAC5-20-21) .
(4) Nozzles or orifices for flow rate
measurements shall be designed, constructed, installed, calibrated, and used
following the recommendations in "American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Interim Supplement 19.5 on Instruments and Apparatus: Application, Part II of
Fluid Meters," 6th Edition (1971), chapter 4 (see
9VAC5-20-21) .
(5) Before each dioxins/furans emission test,
or at least once a year, all signal conversion elements associated with steam
(or feed water) flow measurements shall be calibrated according to the
manufacturer's instructions.
b. If the municipal waste combustion units do
not generate steam, or if the municipal waste combustion units have shared
steam systems and steam load cannot be estimated per unit, the owner shall
determine, to the satisfaction of the board, one or more operating parameters
that can be used to continuously estimate load level (for example, the feed
rate of municipal solid waste or refuse-derived fuel). The selected parameters
shall be monitored continuously.
2. The owner shall install, calibrate,
maintain, and operate a device to continuously measure the temperature of the
flue gas stream at the inlet of each particulate matter control
device.
3. Municipal waste
combustion units that use activated carbon to control dioxins/furans or mercury
emissions shall perform the following.
a. A
carbon injection system operating parameter that can be used to calculate
carbon feed rate (for example, screw feeder speed) shall be selected.
b. During each dioxins/furans and mercury
emission test, the average carbon feed rate in kilograms (or pounds) per hour
and the average operating parameter level that correlates to the carbon feed
rate shall be determined. A relationship between the operating parameter and
the carbon feed rate in order to calculate the carbon feed rate based on the
operating parameter level shall be established.
c. The selected operating parameter shall be
continuously monitored during all periods when the municipal waste combustion
unit is operating and combusting waste, and the eight-hour block average carbon
feed rate shall be calculated in kilograms (or pounds) per hour, based on the
selected operating parameter. When calculating the eight-hour block average,
(i) hours when the municipal waste combustion unit is not operating shall be
excluded, and (ii) hours when the municipal waste combustion unit is operating
but the carbon feed system is not working correctly shall be
included.
4. Continuous
parameter monitoring systems shall meet the following requirements.
a. One-hour arithmetic averages shall be
obtained for the following parameters:
(1)
Load level of the municipal waste combustion unit;
(2) Temperature of the flue gases at the
inlet of the particulate matter control device; and
(3) Carbon feed rate if activated carbon is
used to control dioxins/furans or mercury emissions.
b. In order to calculate a valid one-hour
arithmetic average, at least two data points per hour shall be
obtained.
c. Valid one-hour
averages shall be obtained for at least 75% of the operating hours per day for
90% of the operating days per calendar quarter. An operating day is any day the
unit combusts any municipal solid waste or refuse-derived fuel.
d. If the minimum data required in
subdivisions 4 a through c of this subsection are not obtained, the owner is in
violation of the data collection requirement, and shall notify the board
according to
9VAC5-40-6770 B 2 e.
J. An initial
evaluation of the continuous opacity monitoring system shall be completed
according to Performance Specification 1 in appendix B of 40 CFR Part 60 no
later than 180 days after the final compliance date specified in
9VAC5-40-6710 A. Each annual
evaluation of the continuous opacity monitoring system shall be completed no
more than 13 months after the previous evaluation. Tests shall be conducted
according to Reference Method 9, as specified in
9VAC5-40-6740 D, to determine
compliance with the opacity limit in
9VAC5-40-6660. The data obtained
from the continuous opacity monitoring system are not used to determine
compliance with the opacity limit.
K. Operation of the continuous emission
monitoring systems and continuous opacity monitoring system shall use the
required span values and applicable performance specifications in
9VAC5-40-6750 C.
L. If any continuous emission monitoring
systems are temporarily unavailable to meet the data collection requirements
due to systems malfunction or when repairs, calibration checks, or zero and
span checks prevent collection of the minimum amount of data, the alternate
methods found in
9VAC5-40-6740 D shall be
used.
Statutory Authority
§ 10.1-1308 of the Code of Virginia.