Current through Register Vol. 41, No. 3, September 23, 2024
A. General
criteria for granting a variance on a case-by-case basis.
1. The department is required by §
62.1-44.34:15.1 of the Code of Virginia to establish the criteria to grant
variances of the AST pollution prevention requirements on a case-by-case basis
and by regulation for categories of ASTs. Any person affected by this chapter
may petition the department to grant a variance of any requirement of Part III
(9VAC25-91-130
et seq.) of this chapter.
2. The
department will not grant any petition for a variance related to:
a. Definitions;
b. Registration;
c. Classification of aboveground storage
tanks; or
d. Oil discharge
contingency plans.
3.
The department may grant a variance if:
a. The
applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the department that the alternate
design or operation will result in a facility that is equally capable of
preventing pollution of state water, land, and storm drains from the discharge
of oil from new and existing ASTs. If the variance would extend a deadline, the
petitioner shall demonstrate that a good faith effort to comply with the
deadline was made;
b. Granting the
variance will not result in an unreasonable risk to human health or the
environment; and
c. Granting the
variance will not result in a conflict with applicable local codes or
ordinances.
4. In
rendering a decision, the department may:
a.
Deny the petition;
b. Grant the
variance as requested;
c. Grant a
modified variance which:
(1) Specifies
additional or modified requirements;
(2) Includes a schedule for:
(a) Periodic review of the modified
requirements;
(b) Implementation by
the facility of such control measures as the department finds necessary in
order that the variance may be granted; or
(c) Compliance, including increments of
progress, by the facility with each requirement of the variance; or
(3) Specifies the termination date
of the variance.
d.
Grant a partial variance that:
(1) Specifies
a particular part of the requirement;
(2) Specifies a particular part of the
request;
(3) Includes a schedule
for:
(a) Periodic review of the partial
requirements;
(b) Implementation by
the facility of such control measures as the department finds necessary in
order that the variance may be granted; or
(4) Specifies the termination date of the
variance.
5.
An operator must comply with the requirements of this chapter even when a
variance request is under consideration by the department. A variance request
submitted but disapproved, or submitted but not yet decided, shall not
constitute a defense or delay to any enforcement action undertaken by the
department.
B.
Administrative procedures.
1. General
requirements for the submission of a petition by the owner or a duly authorized
representative. All petitions submitted to the department shall include:
a. The owner's or duly authorized
representative's name and address;
b. A citation of the regulatory requirement
to which a variance is requested;
c. An explanation of the need or desire for
the proposed action, including the reason the existing requirement is not
achievable or is impractical compared to the alternative being
proposed;
d. An explanation of the
impact to applicable local codes and ordinances;
e. A description of the proposed
action;
f. The duration of the
variance, if applicable;
g. The
potential impact of the variance on human health or the environment and a
justification of the proposed action's ability to provide equivalent protection
of human health and the environment as would compliance with the regulatory
requirements;
h. Enforcement action
against or pending against the petitioner;
i. Other information believed by the
applicant to be pertinent; and
j.
The following statements signed by the owner or a duly authorized
representative:
"I certify that I have personally examined and am familiar
with the information submitted in this petition and all attached documents, and
that, based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for
obtaining the information, I believe that the submitted information is true,
accurate, and complete. The petition, if granted, will not be in violation of
any local codes or ordinances or pose an unreasonable risk to human health or
the environment. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting
false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment."
2. In addition to the
general information required of all petitioners under subdivision 1 of this
subsection, the petitioner shall submit other information as may be required by
the department.
3. All variance
petitions and correspondence shall be submitted to the following address:
Mailing Address:
Department of Environmental Quality
Office of Spill Response and Remediation
P.O. Box 1105
Richmond, VA 23218
Street Address:
Department of Environmental Quality
Office of Spill Response and Remediation
1111 East Main Street, Suite 1400
Richmond, VA 23219
C. Petition processing.
1. After receiving a petition that includes
the information required in subdivision B 1 of this section, the department
will determine whether the information received is sufficient to render the
decision. If the information is deemed to be insufficient, the department will
specify additional information needed and request that it be
furnished.
2. The petitioner may
submit the additional information requested, may attempt to show that no
reasonable basis exists for the request for additional information, or may
withdraw the petition. If the department agrees that no reasonable basis exists
for the request for additional information, the department will act in
accordance with subdivision 3 b of this subsection. If the department continues
to believe that a reasonable basis exists to require the submission of such
information, the department will deny the petition.
3. After the petition is deemed complete:
a. The department will review the
petition;
b. After evaluating the
petition, the department will notify the applicant of the following final
decision:
(1) Petition is denied;
(2) Requested variance is granted;
or
(3) Modified or partial variance
is granted;
c. The
department shall send written notification of the variance to the chief
administrative officer of the locality in which the facility is located;
and
d. If the department grants a
variance request, the notice to the petitioner shall provide that the variance
may be terminated upon a finding by the department that the petitioner has
failed to comply with any variance requirements.
D. Variance by regulation for
categories of ASTs.
1. ASTs totally off
ground shall not be subject to inventory control or testing for significant
variation if:
a. All associated piping is off
ground;
b. All associated buried
piping is double walled; or
c. All
associated piping meets the requirements using a combination of subdivisions 1
a and 1 b of this subsection.
2. ASTs with a capacity of 5,000 gallons or
less located within a building or structure designed to fully contain a
discharge of oil shall not be subject to inventory control or testing for
significant variation.
3. ASTs
containing No. 5 or No. 6 fuel oil for consumption on the premises where stored
shall not be subject to inventory control or testing for significant
variation.
4. ASTs with release
prevention barriers (RPBs) and with an established corrosion rate and cathodic
protection that protects the entire area of the tank bottom shall not be
subject to inventory control or testing for significant variation if:
a. All associated piping is off
ground;
b. All associated buried
piping is double walled; or
c. All
associated piping meets the requirements using a combination of subdivisions 4
a and 4 b of this subsection.
5. ASTs with release prevention barriers
(RPBs) and with secondary containment that is 72 hours impermeable shall not be
subject to inventory control or testing for significant variation if:
a. All associated piping is off
ground;
b. All associated buried
piping is double walled; or
c. All
associated piping meets the requirements using a combination of subdivisions 5
a and 5 b of this subsection.
6. ASTs that meet the construction and
installation standards of STI-F911, F921, or F941, or equivalent standards
approved by the department shall not be subject to inventory control or testing
for significant variation.
7. For
refineries with a continuous leak detection monitoring system and cathodic
protection of the AST and piping, a significant variation of inventory shall be
considered a loss in excess of 3.0% by weight of the difference between the
refinery's input and output.
8.
Vaulted tanks meeting UL 2245 or an equivalent standard approved by the
department shall not be subject to inventory control or testing for significant
variation. The inspections for these tanks required in
9VAC25-91-130
B 5 need to be conducted no more frequently than once every 31 days. The
criteria for the visual daily inspection and weekly inspection checklist shall
be incorporated into a monthly checklist.
9. An AST used in the
production/manufacturing process with full containment that is 72 hours
impervious shall not be subject to inventory control or testing for significant
variation.
10. An AST of 12,000
gallons or less with full containment that is 72 hours impervious, inside a
building and used for the storage of heating oil consumed on the premises shall
not be subject to inventory control or testing for significant
variation.
11. A double-walled AST
shall not be subject to inventory control or testing for significant variation.
The inspections required in
9VAC25-91-130
B 5 need be conducted no more frequently than once every 31 days. The criteria
for the visual daily inspection and weekly inspection checklist shall be
incorporated into a monthly checklist.
Statutory Authority: §§ 62.1-44.15,
62.1-44.34:15, 62.1-44.34:15.1, and 62.1-44.34:19.1 of the Code of
Virginia.