Current through August, 2024
Section
1 GENERAL
1.1 Purpose
It is a policy of the State of Vermont to assist
farmers with the implementation of Best Management Practices that
will protect and maintain water quality by reducing agricultural
nonpoint source pollution. The implementation of Best Management
Practices is subsequent to the implementation of Accepted
Agricultural Practices.
1.2 Authorities: Sections 4810,
4821, 4822, 4823, 4824
Section 2 DEFINITIONS
2.1 AAPs means "accepted
agricultural practices" as defined in rule by the commissioner of
agriculture, food and markets pursuant to 6 V.S.A., Chapter
215.
2.2 Agricultural
nonpoint source waste means wastes that reach the waters of the state
via indirect discharge in a diffuse manner as a result of
agricultural practices.
2.3 BMPs means best management
practices. Best management practices are site specific on-farm
remedies implemented either voluntarily or as required in order to
address water quality problems and in order to achieve compliance
with state water quality standards.
2.4 Commissioner means the
commissioner of agriculture, food and markets.
2.5 Department means the department
of agriculture, food and markets.
2.6 Farmer means:
(a) an agricultural producer
eligible for federal agricultural conservation program or Public Law
83-566 cost share assistance or programs that succeed those programs;
or
(b) a person engaged
in farming as defined by the Accepted Agricultural Practice
Rules.
2.7 FSA
means the "farm service agency" of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture.
2.8 NRCS
means the "natural resource conservation service" of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture.
2.9 Secretary means the secretary
of the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, or his or her designated
representative.
2.10
Vermont Phosphorus Models means models developed by the natural
resource conservation service to predict phosphorus loading to waters
of the State from agricultural nonpoint sources.
2.11 Waters or Waters of the State
means all rivers, streams, creeks, brooks, reservoirs, ponds, lakes,
springs and all bodies of surface waters, artificial or natural,
which are contained within, flow through or border upon the state or
any portion of it.
Section
3 WATERSHED TREATMENT PRIORITIES FOR VOLUNTARY
IMPLEMENTATION OF BMPs
3.1 State
financial assistance available under this rule shall be allocated in
each fiscal year according to the following priorities, except as
provided by subsection 3.8.
3.2 The boundaries of the Lake
Champlain Basin and the Lake Memphremagog Basin are those defined by
the state water quality plan prepared by the Vermont Agency of
Natural Resources.
3.3
First priority shall be given to funding BMP implementation on
individual farms:
(a) in the Lake
Champlain Basin or the Lake Memphremagog Basin; and
(b) that cannot implement AAPs
because of physical constraints on the farm; and
(c) for which contracts or
agreements for animal waste management systems have been approved by
the NRCS or the FSA; and
(d) in descending order of
magnitude of their potential to load phosphorus to waters of the
State based on models such as the Vermont Phosphorus Models developed
by the NRCS; or
(e) in
descending order of magnitude of their potential to load agricultural
nonpoint source wastes other than phosphorus to waters of the
state.
3.4
Second priority shall be given to funding BMP implementation on
individual farms:
(a) outside the
Lake Champlain Basin or the Lake Memphremagog Basin; and
(b) that cannot implement AAPs
because of physical constraints on the farm; and
(c) for which contracts or
agreements for animal waste management systems have been approved by
the NRCS or the FSA; and
(d) in descending order of
magnitude of their potential to load agricultural nonpoint source
wastes to waters of the State.
3.5 Third priority shall be given
to funding BMP implementation on individual farms:
(a) located within the boundaries
of the Lake Champlain Basin or the Lake Memphremagog Basin;
and
(b) that wish to make
improvements to control nonpoint source pollution on the farm;
and
(c) for which
contracts or agreements for animal waste management systems have been
approved by the NRCS or the FSA; and
(d) in descending order of
magnitude of their potential to load phosphorus to waters of the
State based on models such as the Vermont Phosphorus Models developed
by NRCS; or
(e) in
descending order of magnitude of their potential to load agricultural
nonpoint source wastes to waters of the State.
3.6 Fourth priority shall be given
to funding BMP implementation on all other individual farms:
(a) that are located outside the
boundaries of the Lake Champlain Basin or the Lake Memphremagog
Basin; and
(b) that wish
to make improvements to control nonpoint source pollution on the
farm; and
(c) for which
contracts or agreements for animal waste management systems have been
approved by the NRCS or the FSA; and
(d) in descending order of
magnitude of their potential to load agricultural nonpoint source
wastes to waters of the State.
3.7 Fifth priority shall be given
to funding BMP implementation on other individual farms located
anywhere in the state:
(a) for
animal waste management systems which have not been approved for cost
sharing by the NRCS or the FSA and where these animal waste
management systems have been designed and certified by a professional
engineer licensed in the State of Vermont to be equivalent to the
performance standards contained in Sections 4.1(a) or
(b) of these rules; and
(b) in descending order of
magnitude of their potential to load agricultural nonpoint source
wastes to waters of the State.
3.8 Exceptions. The commissioner
may award financial assistance under this section for BMPs on a farm
that otherwise would not receive assistance under the priorities
established in this section when the commissioner determines a severe
condition of nonpoint source waste discharge exists that requires
immediate abatement. Financial assistance will be awarded only if the
farmer has not been notified in writing by either the state or the
federal government that a specific practice must be performed to
avoid enforcement actions being taken against the farmer.
Section 4 BMPs ELIGIBLE
FOR COST SHARING
4.1 BMPs shall be
eligible for cost sharing provided that they meet one of the
following:
(a) are components of
the following BMP Systems contained in the NRCS's National Handbook
of Conservation Practices that are eligible for cost share funding
including, but not limited to: permanent vegetative cover; animal
waste management; stripcropping; terraces; diversions; pasture and
hayland management; waterways; cropland protection; conservation
tillage; stream protection; permanent vegetative cover on critical
areas; sediment retention, erosion or water control structures; tree
planting; nutrient management; or conservation cropping; or
(b) are the FSA Agricultural
Conservation Program-eligible practices that are defined in the FSA's
handbook "1-ACP (Rev. 3) Amend. 3" or as subsequently amended;
or
(c) infrastructure
that is designed and certified by a professional engineer licensed in
the State of Vermont to be equivalent to the performance standards of
those practices contained in subsections (a) or (b); or
(d) are integrated crop management
systems designed to achieve the source reduction of nonpoint source
agricultural wastes that are developed by certified crop advisors or
other agricultural professionals such as, but not limited to, the
University Extension Specialists; and
(e) are consistent with a "nutrient
management plan" prepared by the Vermont field office of the NRCS, or
with an animal waste management plan based on standards equivalent to
those of the NRCS.
Section 5 STATE FINANCIAL
ASSISTANCE AWARDS AND APPLICATION PROCESS
5.1 State financial assistance
awarded under this section shall be in the form of a grant. When a
state grant is intended to match federal financial assistance for the
same on farm improvement project, the state grant shall be awarded
only when the available federal financial assistance has also been
approved or awarded and where the applicant has agreed to accept the
maximum federal financial assistance available. An applicant for a
state grant shall pay at least 15 percent of the total eligible
project cost. The dollar amount of a state grant shall be equal to
the total eligible project cost, less 15 percent of the total as paid
by the applicant, and less the amount of any federal assistance
awarded or awards from other sources, except that a state grant shall
not exceed 35 percent of the total eligible project cost where
federal funds will be matched with the state grant. When there will
be no federal funds to match the state grant, the state grant shall
not exceed 50 percent of the total eligible project cost.
5.2 Applications shall be
considered by the commissioner on the basis of the watershed
treatment priorities established in Section
3
of these rules.
5.3
Farmers seeking funding under this program shall file the following
information:
(a) For those farmers
who also seek federal financial assistance for this purpose:
(1) a photocopy of the completed
USDA form or forms for BMP cost share assistance; and
(2) the department's BMP Grant
Application Form 1.
(b) For those farmers who decline
federal financial assistance for implementation of BMPS:
(1) the department's BMP Grant
Application Form 2.
5.4 The BMP Grant Application Form
1 shall contain the following information: FSA farm number, farmer
name, location, statement of need. The BMP Grant Application Form 2
shall contain the following information: farm number, farmer name,
location, description of the practice according to the standards set
out in Section 4.1(c) of these rules, statement of need, estimated
practice cost, cost share amount requested, and expected construction
date.
5.5 Applications
that are filed on or before October 1 of each year shall be given
priority for funding in the next calendar year pursuant to the
priorities contained in Section
3
of these rules.
5.6
Approval for State cost sharing for BMPs under these rules shall be
obtained prior to commencement of construction of the BMP for which
cost sharing is requested, except that between the effective date of
these rules and March 30, 1996 the commissioner may award grants
according to the priorities established in Section
3
for eligible BMPs on which construction was started on or after April
26, 1995.
Section
6 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS
6.1 Awards of funding for BMP
implementation shall require that the BMP be operated and maintained
under contract or agreement for the design life of the practice under
contract or agreement, but not to exceed 10 years.
6.2 Contracts for state grants
awarded to an applicant shall be awarded in accordance with state
contract containing terms substantially the same as those required
for receipt of federal award for the same purpose from the U.S.
Department of Agriculture.
6.3 The contract will include
provisions relating to Departmental oversight of the BMP's
construction, certification of its construction as designed, and
compliance monitoring of its operation. In cases where the federal
government has also cost shared the BMP, the contract will establish
responsibility of the involved agencies for these
activities.
6.4 Failure
to operate and maintain the BMP as specified in the contract will
expose the recipient to state penalties including the obligation to
repay the value of the grant remaining at such time as the
commissioner determines that the contract has been
violated.
6.5 Operation
and maintenance of a BMP system for the term of the contract shall be
the responsibility of the BMP grant recipient.
Section 7 PROCESS FOR PETITIONING
TO REQUIRE BMPs
7.1 General
The commissioner, upon receipt of a petition from a
person with an interest in the agricultural nonpoint source component
of the basin planning process, or on his or her own motion, shall
determine whether to require BMPs beyond AAPs on farms or in a
specific basin in order to achieve compliance with the water quality
goals in section
1250
of Title 10 and any duly adopted basin plan.
7.2 Sufficient Financial Assistance
If at any time implementation of a BMP is required by
the commissioner in order to correct a water quality violation or to
achieve compliance with water quality standards in adjoining reaches
of waters, receipt by a farmer of a grant of 85 percent of the total
cost of a BMP's design, construction and the auxiliary equipment
necessary to operate the system(s) from federal, state, or other
sources shall be considered by the commissioner to constitute
sufficient financial assistance as required by
6 V.S.A. §
4810. The commissioner may consider
the farmer's ability to pay and determine that a contribution of less
than 15 percent of the total BMP cost by the farmer is allowed in
some circumstances.
7.3 Content of Petitions
Any petition shall be in writing and shall contain
the following information unless waived in writing by the
commissioner.
(1) The name
and complete mailing address of the farmer(s) whose actions violate
water quality standards;
(2) Documentation of the water
quality violation including a study conducted in accordance with the
Environmental Protection Agency's quality assurance quality control
program standards for the Clean Water Act and research or evaluative
studies. The data must reasonably demonstrate that there is a
correlation between the water quality violation and the farmer(s)'
practices.
(3) A
description of the specific action(s) sought by the petitioner citing
the applicable provisions of these rules and state law;
(4) A detailed narrative of why the
corrective action(s) sought by the petition is consistent with these
rules including a discussion of which AAP(s) is insufficient land
treatment; and
(5) Copies
of all documents that the petitioner intends to rely upon in support
of the petition.
7.4 Determination of Complete
Petition
Upon the initial filing of the petition the
commissioner may determine that additional information is necessary.
Within 15 days of receipt of the petition the commissioner shall
notify the petitioner of the required information. At the same time,
the commissioner shall notify the petitioner of persons who shall
receive the petition as provided by Section 7.5(d) of these rules.
Upon receipt of that information, the petition shall be deemed to be
complete and the review and hearing process as contained in
subsection 7.6 shall start.
7.5 Petition Distribution
The petitioner shall, in addition to filing an
original and three (3) copies with the commissioner, certify by
affidavit that a complete copy of the petition and documentation has
been filed with:
(a) the
farmer(s) who are the subject of the petition;
(b) the secretary;
(c) the water resources board;
and
(d) other persons as
the commissioner deems appropriate.
7.6 Review and Hearing Process
(1) The commissioner shall schedule
a public hearing within 60 days of receipt of the complete petition.
The commissioner shall provide notice of the petition and the public
hearing to all persons required to be served by Section 7.3 as well
as to such other persons as he or she deems appropriate. The
commissioner shall also publish notice at the petitioner's expense of
the petition and hearing in a local newspaper generally circulating
in the area where the farm(s) is located not less than 30 days before
the public hearing. Such notice shall provide not less than 30 days
in which to file written comments on the petition.
(2) The commissioner shall hold a
public hearing in the community in which the farm which is the
subject of the petition is located within 60 days of the filing of
the petition.
7.7 Notice of Decision
The commissioner shall make all practical efforts to
issue a written decision in a timely manner. The decision shall set
forth the facts and reasons supporting his or her decision. The
commissioner shall provide copies of the decision to all persons
entitled to receive notice under subsections (5) and (6)
above.
7.8 Appeal
Any person engaged in farming who has been required
by the commissioner to implement best management practices or any
person who has petitioned the commissioner under this section may
appeal the commissioner's decision to the water resources board de
novo.
Section
8 PHOSPHORUS LOADING REDUCTION CREDITING
8.1 The department's 1995 Vermont
Dairy BMP Survey shall create the baseline data for determining
phosphorus reduction credits for discontinuing winter spreading of
manure within the Lake Champlain Basin.
8.2 The following practices shall
be used to determine environmental credits for phosphorus reduction
measured at the edge of the field following BMP implementation as
part of a lake phosphorus allocation process:
(a) Milk house waste treatment is
the storage of the waste in an animal waste treatment system,
treatment through a filter strip or other system designed and
constructed for such treatment.
(b) Waste utilization is a planned
system to manage liquid and solid wastes, including runoff from
concentrated waste areas, with ultimate disposal in a manner that
does not degrade soil or water resources.
(c) Barnyard runoff treatment is a
system to collect, control, and treat agricultural wastes from
barnyards, feedlots, and other outdoor livestock concentration areas
for disposal in a non-polluting manner. Its purpose is to properly
manage runoff from barnyards and related areas to minimize
degradation of water quality and to conserve nutrients for use in
crop production.
(d)
Erosion control is a system to reduce soil erosion and water
pollution on sloping cropland to reduce overland transport of
pollutants.
(e) Grazing
management is the exclusion of livestock from waters of the state
other than from planned watering points.
(f) Nutrient management is handling
the amount, placement and timing of plant nutrient application
including a prohibition on winter spreading and is intended to supply
adequate plant nutrients for crop production and plant growth; to
minimize entry of nutrients and pathogens to surface and ground
water; and to maintain or improve the chemical and biological
conditions of the soils.
(g) A one-time phosphorus credit.
because of a prohibition on winter spreading of animal manures
(between December 15 and April 1) as required by the AAPs, shall be
calculated at 0.15 pounds of phosphorus per animal unit for all farms
identified as winter spreading in the department's 1995 Vermont Dairy
BMP Survey.
8.3 The numerical values and the
basis for determining phosphorus reduction credits for practices
identified in subsection 8.2 of these rules will be contained in a
procedure adopted and periodically revised, as necessary, by the
commissioner in consultation with the secretary. The credits shall be
used to show progress towards attaining compliance with the
phosphorus allocation plan necessary to meet in-lake standards for
phosphorus within the Lake Champlain Basin.
Section 9 REPORTS
Annually by January 15 of each year, the
commissioner shall report to the general assembly regarding
activities in support of the objectives of this rule, including use
of state, federal and private funds:
(1) undertaken during the preceding
fiscal year;
(2) in
progress during the current fiscal year;
(3) projected for the following
fiscal year; and
(4)
remaining to be undertaken after the following fiscal year.
AUTHORITY:
6 V.S.A.,
§§
4810,
4821,
4822,
4823,
4824