Code of Vermont Rules
Agency 12 - AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Sub-Agency 032 - WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION
Chapter 005 - LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL SITING, SCREENING, AND CERTIFICATION REGULATIONS
Section 12 032 005 - LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL SITING, SCREENING, AND CERTIFICATION REGULATIONS

Universal Citation: VT Code of Rules 12 032 005

Current through August, 2024

0-100 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES

0-101 Protection of the general population from releases of radioactivity. Concentrations of radioactive material which may be released to the general environment in ground water, surface water, air, soil, plants, or animals must not result in an annual dose exceeding an equivalent of 25 millirems to the whole body, 75 millirems to the thyroid, and 25 millirems to any other organ of any member of the public. Reasonable effort should be made to maintain releases of radioactivity in effluents to the general environment as low as is reasonably achievable. ( 10 CFR 61.41)

0-102 Protection of individuals from inadvertent intrusion. Design, operation, and closure of the land disposal facility must ensure protection of any individual inadvertently intruding into the disposal site and occupying the site or contacting the waste at any time after active institutional controls over the disposal site are removed.( 10 CFR 61.42)

0-103 Protection of individuals during operations. Operations at the land disposal facility must be conducted in compliance with the standards for radiation protection set out in part in 10 CFR, Part 20 except for releases of radioactivity in effluents from the land disposal facility which shall be governed by 10 CFR 61.41. Every reasonable effort shall be made to maintain radiation exposures as low as is reasonably achievable. ( 10 CFR 61.43)

0-104 Stability of the disposal site after closure. The disposal facility must be sited, designed, used, operated, and closed to achieve long-term stability of the disposal site and to eliminate to the extent practicable the need for ongoing active maintenance of the disposal site following closure so that only surveillance, monitoring, or minor custodial care are required. ( 10 CFR 61.44)

0-105 The maximum allowable average annual concentration of radioactivity in community water supplies due to man-made radionuclides shall comply with 40 CFR 141.15 and 141.16 as given below:

40 CFR 141.15: Maximum contaminant levels for radium-226, radium-228, and gross alpha particle radioactivity in community water systems.

The following are the maximum contaminant levels for radium-226, radium-228, and gross alpha radioactivity:

a) Combined radium-226 and radium-228 -- 5pCi/l.

b) Gross alpha particle activity (including radium-226 but excluding radon and uranium) -- 15pCi/l

40 CFR 141.16: Maximum contaminant levels for beta particle and photon radioactivity from man-made radionuclides in community water systems.

a) The average annual concentration of beta particle and photon radioactivity from man-made radionuclides in drinking water shall not produce an annual dose equivalent to the total body or any internal organ greater than 4 millirem/year.

b) Except for the radionuclides listed in Table A, the concentration of man-made radionuclides causing 4 mrem total body or organ dose equivalents shall be calculated on the basis of a 2 liter per day drinking water intake using 168 hour data listed in Maximum Permissible Body Burdens and Maximum Permissible Concentration of Radionuclides in Air or Water for Occupational Exposure, NBS Handbook 69 as amended August. 1963, U.S. Department of Commerce. If two or more radionuclides are present, the sum of their annual dose equivalent to the total body or any organ shall not exceed 4 millirem/year.

Table A -- AVERAGE ANNUAL CONCENTRATIONS ASSUMED TO PRODUCE A TOTAL BODY OR ORGAN DOSE OF 4 MREM/YR

RadionuclidesCritical OrganpCi/liter

Tritium

Total body

20,000

Strontium-90

Bone marrow

8

CFR - An acronym for Code of Federal Regulations.

0-106 Protection of the environment from releases of radioactivity. The annual dose limits referenced in 0-101 and 0-105 have been developed to limit human exposure to radiation. In order to further protect the general environment from releases of radioactivity, additional efforts should be made to eliminate or reduce to the extent possible releases of radioactivity to the general environment. Containment shall be the primary mechanism to achieve compliance with the performance objectives.

0-200 DEFINITIONS

Buffer Zone - a portion of the disposal site that is controlled by the licensee and that lies under the disposal units and between the disposal units and the boundary of the site ( 10 CFR 61.2) . The buffer zone shall be of adequate dimensions to carry out environmental monitoring activities and take mitigative measures if needed ( 10 CFR 61.52(8)) (cf 1-402, below).

Certification Data Package - A submittal containing existing, available information sufficient to provide a basis on which the Agency can evaluate the ability of a site to meet the siting regulations.

Class A Waters - the waters of all lakes, ponds, and reservoirs, natural or artificial, used exclusively for public water supply prior to July 1, 1971, and all waters flowing into such lakes, ponds, and reservoirs unless reclassified (10 V.S.A. 1253).

Class I Groundwaters - groundwater suitable for use as a public water supply, which has uniformly excellent character, and is not exposed to activities which pose a risk to its current or potential use as a public water supply (10 V.S.A. 1392-1394).

Class II Groundwaters - groundwater suitable for use as a public water supply which has uniformly excellent character and which is exposed to activities which pose a risk to its current or potential use as a public water supply (10 V.S.A. 1392-1394).

Community Water System - means a public water system which serves at least ten (10) service connections used by year-round residents or regularly serves at least 25 year-round residents.

Design Life - a period of time which includes the active life of the facility (that time during which waste is being placed in the facility), the post-closure period, the institutional control period (presently federally mandated as up to 100 years), and any additional time period required by the Agency under 10 V.S.A. 7023(b).

Disposal - the isolation of radioactive wastes from the biosphere inhabited by humans and containing their food chains by emplacement in a land disposal facility (modified from 10 CFR 61.2) .

Disposal Area - the area of land that includes all the disposal units, but not the buffer zone.

Disposal Facility - means the land, buildings, and equipment which is intended to be used for the disposal of radioactive waste. (Modified from "Land Disposal Facility" 10 CFR 61)

Disposal Site - that portion of a land disposal facility which is used for disposal of waste. It consists of disposal units and a buffer zone ( 10 CFR 61.2)

Disposal Unit - a discrete portion of the disposal site into which waste is placed for disposal ( 10 CFR 61.2)

Environmental Monitoring System - the equipment and procedures required to provide data to evaluate the potential health and environmental impacts during both construction and the operation of the facility and to enable the evaluation of the long-term effects and the need for mitigative measures. The monitoring system must be capable of providing early warning of releases of radionuclides in the disposal site before they leave the site boundary ( 10 CFR 61.53(c)) .

Engineered Barrier - a structure or device that is constructed to improve the land disposal facility's ability to meet the performance objectives (modified from 10 CFR 61.2) .

EPA - An acronym for United States Environmental Protection Agency.

Exclusion Factors - those attributes of land areas that, on the basis of the siting regulations, would require exclusion of the associated land areas from consideration as sites for the disposal facility (see Section 2-400).

Factor - the individual data item or land attribute addressed by the intent or specific requirements of all or part of a siting regulation (see Section 2-300).

500-year Floodplain - the lowland and relatively flat areas adjoining inland and coastal waters including, at a minimum, that area subject to a 0.2 percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year (modified from Executive Order 11988 - Floodplain Management).

(GIS) Geographical Information Systems - computer-based information handling programs that can store and manipulate both map-based information and associated tabular data, such as zip codes, population density, etc.

Karst - refers to a number of different geologic features found in areas of limestone or similar carbonate rocks, and includes sinkholes, caverns, caves, and open underground fissures.

LLRW - an acronym for low-level radioactive waste.

Liquefaction - the transformation of a granular material (usually sand) from a solid state to a fluid state due to an increase in pore-water pressure (Youd, T.L., 1973; Liquefaction, flow, and associated ground failure, U.S. Geological Survey Circular 688).

Local Exclusion Screening - the application of exclusion factors and subfactors on a local scale.

Local Preference Screening - the application of preference factors at a local scale.

Locally Protected Areas - areas set aside for the protection of natural and/or cultural resources by a town government or regional planning organization, and formally adopted in town or regional zoning maps or plans, planning documents, or other formal documents on or before the date of promulgation of these rules.

Mass wasting - downslope movements of rock or soil in response to gravity.

NRC - an acronym for the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Outstanding Resource Water - waters of the state designated by the Water Resources Board as having exceptional natural, recreational, cultural or scenic values (10 V.S.A. 1422).

Performance Assessment - the process of analyzing the performance of a disposal site, usually using computer modeling. The assessment usually addresses water budget, waste container degradation and leaching, groundwater flow and transport, surface water flow and transport, food chain, and dosimetry (NUREG/CR-5453).

Preference Factors - those attributes of land areas that, on the basis of the siting regulations, would not specifically exclude land areas from consideration, but rather address certain preferences expressed in the siting regulations (see Section 2-400).

Preliminary Flood Hazards Study - a study of potential flood hazards using available data, site-specific probable maximum precipitation, and topographic maps.

Preliminary Investigation - a study designed to collect the minimum amount of data sufficient to provide a similar information base on all potential alternative sites and to allow for meaningful comparative analyses of potential alternative sites.

Publicly Available Data - Any information which is not proprietary and which can be obtained by the general public without special provision.

Public Water Supply - a water supply system with ten or more connections (10 V.S.A. 1391).

Regional - of or pertaining to specific regions of the State of Vermont, specifically those remaining under consideration after completion of Statewide Exclusion Screening.

Regional Exclusion Screening - screening of all land areas remaining after the Statewide Exclusion Screening, on the basis of additional exclusionary factors and subfactors.

Regional Preference Screening - screening of all land areas remaining after the Statewide Exclusion Screening and Regional Exclusion Screening, on the basis of selected preference factors and subfactors.

Site Characterization - the program of in-depth investigations and tasks undertaken to define the site characteristics affecting the isolation of LLRW, the long term stability of the disposal site, and the interactions between the disposal site and its surroundings.

Soil - all unconsolidated materials above the bedrock (Bates and Jackson, 1988; Glossary of Geology, American Geological Institute, Falls Church, VA).

Site Area - any area which lies within 2 kilometers of the boundary of the proposed disposal site.

Statewide - of or pertaining to the entire State of Vermont.

Statewide Exclusion Screening - screening of the entire State of Vermont, other than the Town of Vernon and volunteer sites, using selected exclusion factors. The remaining lands are identified as Potentially Suitable Areas (see Sec. 2-800.1).

Stream - a current of water which is above an elevation of 1,500 feet above sea level or which flows at any time at a rate of less than 1.5 cubic feet per second (10 V.S.A. 6001).

Subfactor - a further breakdown of a Factor based on the range of the size of land areas addressed by the Factor and appropriate mapping scales (see Section 2-300).

V.S.A. - an abbreviation for Vermont Statutes Annotated.

Vermont Yankee Site - a site for a low-level radioactive waste disposal facility on land presently owned by and contiguous to the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation (10 V.S.A. 7001 (13)).

Verifiable - the methods and assumptions used in the model and the modeling process are valid for Vermont geological, hydrogeological, climatological, and other applicable conditions.

Wellhead Protection Area - the surface and subsurface area surrounding a water well or well field, supplying a public water system, through which contaminants are reasonably likely to move towards and reach such well or well field (Draft Vermont Wellhead Protection Program, Vermont Dept of Health, July 18,1990).

Wetland - those areas of the state that are inundated by surface or groundwater with a frequency sufficient to support significant vegetation or aquatic life that depends on saturated or seasonally saturated soil conditions for growth and reproduction. Such areas include, but are not limited to, marshes, swamps, sloughs, potholes, fens, river and lake overflows, mud-flats, bogs, and ponds, but excluding such areas as those that grow food or crops in connection with farming activities (10 V.S.A. 905(7-9)).

CHAPTER 1 SITING REGULATIONS

CATEGORY 1 - GROUNDWATER REGULATIONS

1-101 GROUNDWATER - MODELING CAPABILITY
1-101.a The disposal site shall be located in an area capable of being thoroughly characterized, modeled, analyzed, and monitored. Sites which can be modeled with least uncertainty in analysis shall be preferred.

1-101.b All models, model codes, and other components of models shall be verifiable and available to the Vermont public.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(a)(1) and 10 CFR 61.50(a)(2)

1-102 GROUNDWATER - DISCHARGE TO SURFACE

he disposal site shall be free from groundwater discharge to the surface from any geological unit or zone which contains the disposal units or is hydrogeologically connected to the disposal units.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(a)(7) and 10 CFR 61.50(a)(8)

1-103 GROUNDWATER - DEPTH TO WATER TABLE
1-103.a The disposal site shall be located in an area with sufficient depth to the water table so that groundwater intrusion into the waste, perennial or otherwise, could not occur.

1-103.b In general, sites with greater depths to the water table shall be preferred.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(a)(6) and 10 CFR 61.50(a)(7)

1-104 GROUNDWATER - PERMEABILITY AND SOIL CHEMISTRY
1-104.a Sites which provide greater natural retardation of radionuclides shall be preferred. Sites which are known to contain anomalous zones of highly permeable soil or rock such that they affect the ability of the site to meet performance objectives shall be excluded.

1-104.b Irrespective of the design of the facility, sites requiring the least modification of the natural materials or landforms to make the site acceptable for certification or licensing shall be preferred.

1-104.c If a disposal technology has not been chosen, sites which are most compatible with the largest range of disposal technologies shall be preferred.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(a)(16)

CATEGORY 2 - SURFACE WATER REGULATIONS

1-201 SURFACE WATER - SURFACE WATER BODIES
1-201.a The disposal facility shall not be located within 100 meters of a wetland; or

1-201.b the disposal facility shall not be located within 100 meters of a perennial stream, river, lake or pond which existed as of the date of promulgation of these rules; or

1-201.c the disposal facility shall not be located within 200 meters of designated outstanding resource waters.

1-201.d The disposal site shall be located such that applicable standards established by the NRC, the EPA, and the State of Vermont Water Quality Standards would not be exceeded at the site boundary.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(a)(13); 10 V.S.A. Ch 47; 10 CFR 61.41; 40 CFR 141.15 - 16

1-202 SURFACE WATER - FLOOD PRONE AREAS

The disposal site shall not be located in a wetland or a 500-year floodplain and shall be well drained and free of areas of flooding or frequent ponding.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(a)(4) and 10 CFR 61.50(a)(5)

1-203 SURFACE WATER - UPSTREAM DRAINAGE AREAS

The disposal site shall not be located in areas with upstream drainage areas of the size, geometry, and surface characteristics such that surface runoff could erode, expose, or inundate the waste disposal units.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(a)(5) and 10 CFR 61.5(a)(6)

CATEGORY 3 - GEOLOGIC STABILITY REGULATIONS

1-301 GEOLOGIC STABILITY - SURFICIAL GEOLOGIC PROCESSES
1-301.a The disposal site shall not be located in areas where erosional and weathering processes such as mass wasting, slumping, landsliding, or the development of karst are likely to occur such that they affect the-ability of the disposal site to meet performance objectives.

1-301.b Lands with the least degree of slope shall be preferred.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(a)(9) and 10 CFR 61.50(a)(10)

1-302 GEOLOGIC STABILITY - TECTONIC PROCESSES

The disposal site shall not be located in areas where tectonic processes such as faulting, folding, seismic activity, or volcanism are likely to affect the ability of the disposal site to meet the performance objectives.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(a)(8) and 10 CFR 61.50(a)(9)

1-303 GEOLOGIC STABILITY - LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL
1-303.a Sites where underlying soils have the least potential for liquefaction shall be preferred.

1-303.b The disposal site shall not be located where liquefaction of soils could affect the ability of the site to meet the performance objectives.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(a)(9)

CATEGORY 4 - PUBLIC HEALTH REGULATIONS

1-401 PUBLIC HEALTH - PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES

The disposal site shall not be located within a watershed of Class A waters or of a public water supply, within or adjacent to a Wellhead Protection Area, within or adjacent to Class I or Class II groundwaters, or where surface water quality standards could be reasonably expected to be violated by the disposal facility.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(a)(12) 10 CFR 61.41, 40 CFR 141.15-16

1-402 PUBLIC HEALTH - SITE SIZE

The disposal site shall be of sufficient size to allow the satisfaction of the performance objectives.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(a)(15), 10 CFR 61.41 - 44

1-403 PUBLIC HEALTH - RADIONUCLIDE TRANSPORT MECHANISMS

The disposal site selection process shall consider all potential transport mechanisms for radionuclides, including groundwater, surface water, biotic, and airborne. Disposal sites shall be preferred where exposure to humans will be minimized; where the environment will be minimally impacted; and where remediation of an unanticipated release will be enhanced.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7020(a), and 7021(b)(4)

1-404 PUBLIC HEALTH - TRANSPORTATION

The disposal site selection process shall consider issues related to the transportation of wastes to the facility, including, but not limited to, proximity to waste generators, roadway classification and safety records, and potential impacts on population in the event of transportation accidents.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(b)(4)

CATEGORY 5 - DEMOGRAPHY AND LAND USE REGULATIONS

1-501 DEMOGRAPHY AND LAND USE - PRESENT POPULATION AND LAND USE
1-501.a The disposal site selection process shall consider whether existing population and land use in the vicinity of the disposal site are likely to affect the ability of the site to meet performance objectives. A disposal site location shall be preferred which will limit the disruption of existing population and land use.

1-501.b Sites shall be preferred which minimize site acquisition problems.

1-501.c Sites shall be preferred which have the greatest potential for public acceptance.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(b)(3)

1-502 DEMOGRAPHY AND LAND USE - PROJECTED POPULATION AND LAND USE

The disposal site shall not be located in an area where projected population growth and future development are likely to affect the ability of the disposal site to meet the performance objectives.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(a)(2) and 10 CFR 61.50(a)(3)

1-503 DEMOGRAPHY AND LAND USE - SENSITIVE LAND USE

The disposal site selection process shall consider proximity to sensitive land uses existing or proposed by the date of promulgation of these rules, including but not limited to schools, day care centers, and other facilities which primarily affect children.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(b)(1)

1-504 DEMOGRAPHY AND LAND USE - CONFLICTING LAND USE

The disposal site shall not be located where nearby facilities or activities or any existing radioactive materials could adversely impact the ability of the site to meet the performance objectives or significantly mask the environmental monitoring system.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(a)(10) and 10 CFR 61.50(a)(11)

1-505 DEMOGRAPHY AND LAND USE - FAILURE OF DAMS AND IMPOUNDMENTS

The disposal site shall not be located in an area where the failure of a dam or impoundment could adversely affect the ability of the site to meet the performance objectives.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(a)(14)

1-506 DEMOGRAPHY AND LAND USE - SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACTS

The site selection process shall consider the likely impacts on local governmental units, including, but not limited to, municipal services and emergency response services.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(b)(3)

CATEGORY 6 - NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES REGULATIONS

1-601 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES - FEDERAL PROTECTED LANDS

The disposal site shall not be placed within federally excluded lands set aside for preservation and protection of natural resources. Federal lands specifically identified include, but are not limited to, National Parks, National Wildlife Refuges and Management Areas, federally designated Wild and Scenic Rivers, Wilderness Areas, and National Recreation Areas.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(b)(1)

1-602 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES - STATE PROTECTED LANDS
1-602.a The disposal site shall not be placed within state lands set aside for the preservation and protection of natural resources. State lands specifically identified include, but are not limited to, Camel's Hump State Park, Camel's Hump Forest Reserve, and other state forests, parks, and/or other natural areas.

1-602.b The disposal site shall not be located above 2500 feet (762 meters) mean sea level.

1-602.c The selection process shall consider all applicable state statutes, or regulations, that while not specifically excluding the siting of such a facility, may impact on the feasibility or desirability of siting the disposal facility within or in proximity to designated protected lands. Such lands include, but are not limited to: fragile areas, state and municipal park and forest lands, scenic and recreational areas, scenic and recreational rivers, and state natural areas.

1-602.d Sites that would not have to be removed from agricultural production or forestry production shall be preferred.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 2607, 10 V.S.A. 7021(b)(1), 10 V.S.A. 6086(a)(9)(b), 10 V.S.A. Chapters 77, 151, 155, and 158.

1-603 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES - LOCALLY PROTECTED LANDS

The site selection process shall consider effects of siting on locally protected lands set aside for the preservation and protection of natural and cultural resources.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(b)(1)

1-604 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES - ENDANGERED SPECIES

The disposal site shall not be located in an area that will adversely affect federally designated rare, threatened, or endangered species, or state designated endangered or threatened species, or critical fish and wildlife habitats.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 5401-5409, 10 V.S.A. 6086 (a)(8)(A), 10 V.S.A. 7021(b)(2), Endangered Species Act of 1973 , Public Law 93-205, 87 Stat. 884.

1-605 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES - HISTORIC PROPERTIES
1-605.a The disposal site shall not be located on lands listed in the National or State Register of Historic Places.

1-605.b Additionally, the disposal site selection process shall consider impacts on areas of historic, scenic, archeological, cultural, religious, or ethnic significance.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(b)(1)

1-606 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES - NATURAL RESOURCES

The disposal site shall not be located in areas having known natural resources which, if exploited, would result in the failure of the disposal site to meet the performance objectives.

REGULATORY BASIS: 10 V.S.A. 7021(a)(3) and 10 CFR 61.50(a)(4)

CHAPTER 2 SCREENING PROCEDURES

2-100 SCREENING PROCESS

The Authority shall implement a process for identifying potential alternative sites in accordance with the rules under this chapter. The sequence and schedule for implementing various phases, subphases, and tracts shall be established by the Authority as part of the screening plan.

2-200 ELEMENTS OF THE SCREENING PLAN

The Authority shall develop a Screening Plan to formalize the data sources and sequence of application to address each of the siting regulations and phases of the methodology. The Screening Plan shall be submitted to the Agency for review and comment prior to implementation. The Agency shall have twenty (20) days to review and respond to the Screening Plan. The Authority shall respond to Agency comments on the Screening Plan within 20 days of receipt of comments. The Screening Plan shall include the following elements:

2-201 Recommendation of minimum site size and configuration requirements

2-202 Identification of Screening Factors and Subfactors

2-203 Classification of Screening Factors and Subfactors

2-204 Identification of Data Sources for each Factor and Subfactor

2-205 Assignment of the phase of screening for each Factor and Subfactor

2-206 Definition of the application of Geographic Information System (GIS) technology

2 -207 Identification of public participation procedures which will occur during screening.

2-300 MINIMUM SITE SIZE AND CONFIGURATION REQUIREMENTS

The Authority shall establish the minimum width and minimum total acreage under consideration for the site, including the disposal units and the buffer zone, which shall be adequate to meet the capacity specifications of the Agency's design standards.

2-400 IDENTIFICATION OF SCREENING FACTORS AND SUBFACTORS

As part of the Screening Plan, the Authority shall, for each applicable regulation, develop a list of screening factors and subfactors to address the requirements and intent of the regulation.

2-500 CLASSIFICATION OF SCREENING FACTORS AND SUBFACTORS

As part of the Screening Plan, the Authority shall identify the classification of each screening factor or subfactor as exclusionary or preference. The classification of the factors and subfactors as exclusionary or preference shall in all cases be linked directly to the siting regulations, or any relevant statutes, codes, or regulations.

2-600 IDENTIFICATION AND USE OF DATA SOURCES
2-600.a For each of the factors and subfactors, the Authority shall, to the extent possible, identify the sources of the data sets to be used to implement that factor or subfactor.

2-600.b The Authority, as part of the Screening Plan, shall define the factors and subfactors mapped fully or in GIS format which will be useful in the screening process.

2-600.c GIS shall be used as a data format for any factors or subfactors as identified in 2-600.b.

2-700 ASSIGNMENT OF THE PHASE FOR EACH FACTOR AND SUBFACTOR

The Authority shall identify, for each factor and subfactor, the phase of the process where that factor or subfactor would most likely be applied.

2-800 PHASE 1 - IDENTIFICATION OF CANDIDATE AREAS
2-801 Subphase 1a Statewide Search
2-801.1 Statewide Exclusion

The Authority shall apply exclusionary factors that are preferably mapped statewide to the entire state of Vermont, with the exception of the Town of Vernon and any volunteered sites, to identify Potentially Suitable Areas. The elements of the Screening Plan which address this Subphase 1a screening shall incorporate, at a minimum, the following requirements:

2-801.1.a The factors to be applied at this phase shall be clearly exclusionary in nature based on existing legislation, siting requirements, and other applicable regulations.

2-801.1.b The factors to be applied shall reflect land areas that are of sufficient size and extent to be meaningfully mapped independently on a statewide scale.

2-801.1.c The specific mapping accuracy shall be commensurate with the map scales employed and the accuracy of data sets.

2-801.1.d The map scales employed shall be appropriate for statewide mapping. These scales are likely to be in the range of 1:100,000 to 1:250,000.

2-801.1.e All data sets used shall be from publicly available sources or derived from publicly available sources, preferably statewide in coverage, and of relatively consistent quality and format for the entire state.

2-801.1.f At the completion of the Subphase 1a screening, the minimum size and configuration requirements shall be applied to exclude small or oddly shaped land areas remaining between the boundaries of excluded areas.

2-801.2 Regional Exclusion Screening

The elements of the Screening Plan which address this subphase of the screening shall incorporate, at a minimum, the following requirements:

2-801.2.a Factors shall be applied which are clearly exclusionary in nature.

2-801.2.b The factors to be applied shall refer to land areas large enough to be meaningfully mapped on a regional scale.

2-801.2.c The data sets applied shall be from publicly available sources or derived from publicly available sources, shall be regional or local in coverage, and of relatively consistent quality and format within the regions of interest.

2-801.2.d Mapping shall be done at larger scales than in the Subphase la Statewide Exclusion Screening.

2-801.2.e When larger mapping scales are employed, the borders of the Potentially Suitable Areas shall be refined correspondingly.

2-801.2.f Accuracy of mapped boundaries and other data shall be commensurate with the map scales employed.

2-801.3 Regional Preference Screening

Within the land areas remaining after the Regional Exclusion Screening, the Authority shall apply appropriate regional preference factors and subfactors. The elements of the Screening Plan which address this subphase of the screening shall incorporate, at a minimum, the following requirements:

2-801.3.a Factors shall be applied which clearly address preference regulations.

2-801.3.b The factors to be applied shall refer to land areas that are large enough to be meaningfully mapped on a regional scale.

2-801.3.c Mapping shall be done at larger scales than the statewide exclusion screening.

2-801.3.d When larger scales are employed, the borders of previously excluded areas shall be refined correspondingly.

2-801.3.e All data sets applied shall be from publicly available sources or derived from publicly available sources, shall be regional or local in coverage, and of relatively consistent quality and format within the regions of interest.

2-801.3.f Accuracy of mapped boundaries shall be commensurate with the map scales employed and other data. At the end of this subphase, the minimum site size and configuration requirements shall be applied.

2-801.4 Local Exclusion Screening

At the conclusion of the Regional Preference Screening described above, the remaining land areas shall be evaluated using available maps and data that are at more detailed scales. The elements of the Screening Plan which address this subphase of the screening shall incorporate, at a minimum, the following requirements:

2-801.4.a Mapping shall be completed at scales of 1:24,000 or larger.

2-801.4.b All clearly exclusionary factors having available data sets shall be applied.

2-801.4.c The accuracy of the mapping of all excluded areas shall be commensurate with the more detailed mapping scales used.

2-801.4.d Boundaries of excluded areas from Phase 1 shall be redefined as accurately as feasible, due to the more detailed mapping scales.

2-801.4.e Data used do not have to be statewide in nature, nor do they have to be from publicly available sources.

2-802 Subphase 1b - Evaluation of the Town of Vernon

Candidate Areas or Sites within the Town of Vernon shall be identified by the application of exclusionary factors. The elements of the Screening Plan which address this subphase of the screening shall incorporate, at a minimum, the following requirements:

2-802.1 Mapping shall be completed at scales of 1:24,000 or larger.

2-802.2 All clearly exclusionary factors that have available data sets shall be applied.

2-802.3 The accuracy of the mapping of all excluded areas shall be commensurate with the more detailed mapping scales used.

2-802.4 Data sets do not have to be statewide in nature, nor do they have to be from publicly available sources.

2-802.5 The plan shall incorporate, to the extent feasible, windshield surveys, walkovers, or other reconnaissance field investigations to identify obvious exclusion factors not shown on existing maps.

2-803 Subphase 1c - Evaluation of Volunteer Sites or Areas

Should lands be volunteered for consideration, the Authority shall evaluate the land areas proposed. The elements of the Screening Plan which address this subphase of the screening shall incorporate, at a minimum, the following requirements:

2-803.1 Mapping shall be completed at scales of 1:24,000 or larger.

2-803.2 All exclusionary factors that have available data sets shall be applied.

2-803.3 The accuracy of the mapping of all excluded areas shall be commensurate with the more detailed mapping scales used.

2-803.4 Data used do not have to be statewide in nature, nor do they have to be from publicly available sources.

2-803.5 The plan shall incorporate, to the extent feasible, windshield surveys, walkovers, or other reconnaissance field investigations to identify obvious exclusion factors not shown on existing maps.

2-900 PHASE 2 - IDENTIFICATION OF CANDIDATE SITES

From within these Candidate Areas obtained from the completion of Phase 1 the Authority shall select Candidate Sites. The elements of the Screening Plan which address this phase of the screening shall incorporate, at a minimum, the following requirements:

2 -901 Factors to be applied shall include all appropriate exclusionary factors and subfactors that, because of size, extent, or data availability, were not applied in earlier phases.

2-902 Factors to be applied shall include all preference factors and subfactors for which data are available.

2-903 Mapping shall be done at the largest scales feasible, given available data and maps.

2-904 Mapping accuracy shall be commensurate with the map scales employed and the accuracy of the available data sets.

2-905 Boundaries of excluded areas from earlier phases that impact these lands shall be redefined as accurately as feasible, due to the more detailed maps.

2-906 Data used can be statewide, regional, or local. Data sources do not necessarily have to be from publicly available sources. Data can be developed by the Authority on the basis of aerial photographs or other sources.

2-1000 PHASE 3 - IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL ALTERNATIVE SITES

From within the candidate sites obtained in Phase 2, the Authority shall select at least 3 Potential Alternative Sites which represent the best of the candidate sites as determined by the Authority. The elements of the Screening Plan which address this phase of the screening shall incorporate, at a minimum, the following requirements:

2 -1001 Definition of the basis by which Candidate Sites shall be compared.

2-1002 Involvement of the public, in order to request additional local information that was not accessible during the screening process.

2 -1003 Prior to the public comment period, the Authority shall provide prior notification to affected landowners that the parcels are being considered for certification.

2 -1004 Incorporation of public comment, pursuant to the requirements of 10 V.S.A. 7002(a)(6)(B).

CHAPTER 3 CERTIFICATION REGULATIONS

3-100 SUBMISSION OF POTENTIAL ALTERNATIVE SITES FOR CERTIFICATION

Under 10 V.S.A. 7002(a)(6)(B) and 7022(3), the Authority is required to select and submit to the Agency for certification at least three potential alternative sites, including one in the town of Vernon. The sites submitted shall represent the best of the candidate sites as determined by the Authority. The certification process shall take place in two phases.

3-101 In order to allow the Agency to make a determination as to whether a site meets applicable siting regulations, the Authority shall, as part of the certification request, submit a complete Phase 1 Certification Data Package for each site.

3-102 The Phase 1 Certification Data Package shall provide, at a minimum all existing information about a site relating to the ability of the site to meet the siting requirements.

3-103 When submitting potential alternative sites to the Agency for Phase 1 Certification, the Authority shall provide a summary of how the screening methodology was conducted to allow the Agency to determine that the siting regulations were applied according to the Screening Plan.

3-104 Following the submission of a Phase 1 Certification Data Package, Agency staff shall review the submitted information Upon decision that the Data Package is complete, the Agency shall, within 20 days of that decision, either.
3-104.1 declare that the site appears to meet all siting requirements at applicable at Phase 1 and is so certified; or

3-104.2 declare that, based on data submitted, the site fails to meet the applicable siting regulations, and is not certified.

3-105 If the Agency finds that a site submitted for certification does not appear to meet the exclusionary siting requirements, then the Authority shall eliminate the proposed site from consideration.

3 -106 If the Agency should find that preference regulations were not applied according to the screening plan, the Authority shall repeat portions of the screening process using amended preference screening methodology.

3-200

As Phase 2 certification, the Authority shall complete preliminary investigations on all Phase 1 certified sites as provided for in 10 VSA 7011(4)(B), 7011(4)(G), 7011(6), and 7022(2) These investigations shall be scoped to fulfill the requirements listed in 3-201 of these rules.

3-200.1 Prior to implementing preliminary investigations, the Authority shall develop site specific Preliminary Investigation Work Plans.

3-200.2 The Authority shall submit each Preliminary Investigation Work Plan to the Agency for review and comment.

3-200.3 The Agency shall respond within 20 working days of receiving the work plan.

3-200.4 Within 20 working days of receipt of Agency comments, the Authority shall respond to Agency comments on the adequacy of the work plan for that investigation.

3-200.5 At the completion of each Preliminary Investigation, the Authority shall submit to the Agency a report summarizing the Preliminary Investigation. This report shall include all data generated during the Preliminary Investigation. The Agency shall have 40 working days to either:
3-200.5.a declare that the site appears to meet all applicable siting requirements and is so certified; or

3-200.5.b declare that, based on data submitted, the site fails to meet the applicable siting requirements, and is not certified.

3-201 The Authority shall scope the Preliminary Investigations to meet the following data requirements, which are designed to allow a comparison of the alternative sites.
3-201.1 The Authority shall provide geologic and hydrogeologic information on the site. In order to complete this requirement, the Authority shall consider:
3-201. 1.a: the relative simplicity and homogeneity of the site;

3-201. 1.b: the lateral and vertical variability of the unconsolidated materials;

3-201. 1.c: the hydrologic and hydrogeologic characteristics of the site;

3-201. 1.d: the site hydrogeologic system, including the estimated groundwater flow velocities, flow paths, travel times, and locations of recharge and discharge areas; and

3-201. 1.e: previous contamination of the site, including water quality.

3-201.2 For each site, the Authority shall provide evidence that no groundwater discharge occurs from any geological unit or zone as referenced in siting regulation 1-102.

3-201.3 The Authority shall consider depth to groundwater, including seasonal variations in the water table.

3-201.4 The Authority shall consider the site's capacity to retard/attenuate radionuclides. This can include discussions of redox potential, pH, organic carbon content, and attenuation factors.

3-201.5 The Authority shall:
3-201.5.a submit the results of an inspection of the site which documents the presence of any standing surface water or biota indicative of the presence of hydric soils; and

3-201.5.b consider evidence of active floodplains and terraces, past flooding and bank instability.

3-201.6 The Authority shall consider the effects of erosion and mass wasting on the site due to the probable maximum precipitation event.

3-201.7 The Authority shall consider surficial geomorphic processes as described in Siting Regulation 1-301 such as they may affect the ability of the site to meet performance objectives.

3-201.8 The Authority shall consider the potential susceptibility of site soils to liquefaction.

3-201.9 The Authority shall address the issue of whether any surface water or groundwater quality standards could be reasonably expected to be violated by a facility at the proposed site.

3-201.10 The Authority shall consider the effect of site size on the ability of the site to meet performance objectives.

3-201.11 The Authority shall identify and consider potential radionuclide pathways in comparing potential sites.

3-201.12 The Authority shall:
3-201.12.a consider the potential need to upgrade any existing roads or construct new roads to provide access to the proposed site; and

3-201.12.b consider the potential impacts to nearby population in the event of transportation accidents.

3-201.13 The Authority shall:
3-201.13.a consider the impact of any nearby or on-site facilities, structures, activities, materials, or existing conditions on the ability of the site to be monitored;

3-201.13.b if materials are present which could mask a monitoring system, demonstrate conceptually how a monitoring system could distinguish them from leaks from the waste facility; and

3-201.13.c consider current background levels of radioactivity within the site.

3-201.14 The Authority shall present the results of a preliminary survey, including a walkover of the site which indicates that no previously unidentified, threatened, or endangered species are present at the site.

3-201.15 The Authority shall provide a preliminary assessment that there are not exploitable natural resources in the site area.

3-202 If, prior to completion of the preliminary investigation, the Authority determines one site is obviously superior to the other sites being investigated, the Authority may stop the investigation and determine the Best Potential Alternative Site as described in 4-102

3-203 If, prior to the completion of a preliminary investigation, the Authority determines one site is obviously inferior to the other sites being investigated, the Authority may stop work on this site and continue the preliminary investigations on the other site.

CHAPTER 4 PROCEDURES TO DECIDE WHETHER TO CHARACTERIZE AN ALTERNATIVE SITE OR TO PREPARE A DRAFT LICENSE APPLICATION FOR A PREVIOUSLY CHARACTERIZED SITE

4-100 PROCEDURES FOR DECIDING, BY THE AUTHORITY, TO CHARACTERIZE A CERTIFIED ALTERNATIVE SITE OR TO PREPARE A DRAFT LICENSE APPLICATION FOR A DISPOSAL FACILITY AT A CHARACTERIZED SITE
4-101 The results of the preliminary investigations shall be used by the Authority in determining the "Best Potential Alternative Site" for the purpose of deciding to characterize a certified site or to petition the legislature for approval to develop a license application for a previously characterized site.

4-102 On the basis of the preliminary investigations and other appropriate factors, the Authority shall compare the alternative sites and issue a draft determination of the Best Potential Alternative Site. After public comment on the draft decision, the Authority shall make a final decision on the Best Potential Alternative Site.

4-103 The Authority shall submit to the Agency a report justifying the basis for its decision regarding the Best Potential Alternative Site. The Agency shall have twenty (20) working days from the submission of the report to review and comment on the findings.

4-104 The Authority shall then, after public comment, decide whether:
4-104.1 to characterize the Best Potential Alternative Site, or

4-104.2 to petition the legislature for approval to develop a draft license application for a previously characterized site.

4-105 Prior to a decision to characterize a certified site, the Authority must complete a report on the strengths and weaknesses of a previously characterized site. ( 10 V.S.A. 7012(h))

4-106 If the Authority's choice under 4-107 is to characterize the Best Potential Alternative Site, the Authority shall, within 30 days, petition the legislature for approval of its decision. ( 10 V.S.A. 7002(a)(9))

4 -107 Following characterization of an alternative site, the Authority must again decide whether to characterize another certified site, or petition the legislature for approval to develop a license application for a previously characterized site. ( 10 V.S.A. 7002(a)(10))

4-108 If the Authority's choice or the Legislature's directive under 4-104 is to petition the legislature to prepare a draft license application for a previously characterized site, then the Authority shall complete the requirements of 10 V.S.A. 7012(f). These requirements follow:
4-108.1 conduct a social and economic impacts study to determine the short-term and long-term effects from the proposed disposal facility on the Vermont municipalities which contain, or which are adjacent to municipalities containing, the proposed site and determine the appropriate impact fees to be paid;

4-108.2 prepare a report on the strengths and weaknesses of the site that has been characterized and comparing it to the best potential alternative site identified by the Authority;

4-108.3 negotiate with the local municipalities, or each municipality, where the proposed site is located, any impact fees, other payments, or conditions to be included in the proposal to be submitted to the voters and in the petition to be submitted to the legislature;

4-108.4 hold at least one public hearing near each site; and

4-108.5 obtain the consent of a majority of the voters, present and voting at a duly warned meeting, of the municipality, or of each municipality, where the proposed site is located.

4-109 The reports required by 4-103, 4-105, and 4-108.2 may be combined into a single report or may be submitted separately; the report(s) may be the petition to the legislature required under 4-108. Similarly the report in 4-105 may be the petition required in 4-106.

4-110 The reports to be prepared under 7012(f) shall be submitted to the Agency for review prior to their submission to the legislature. These may be combined into a single report or submitted separately. The Agency shall have 20 working days from the time of submission to review and comment on the findings of the reports.

4-111 The reports to be prepared under 7012(f)(1)&(2) shall be made available to the local municipality or municipalities in which the site is located at least 15 days prior to the initiation of negotiations, so they may have adequate time to review its findings prior to negotiations with the Authority under 7012(f)(3).

4-112 The report to be submitted under 7012(f)(2) shall be submitted to the legislature with the Agency's review comments in support of a petition to allow for preparation of a draft license application.

4-113 In accordance with 7012(f)(3), the Authority shall submit to the legislature with its petition a summary of the results of the negotiations with the local municipalities, and any impact fees or other payments or conditions it has agreed upon with the local municipality.

4 -114 In accordance with 7012(i):" A petition to the legislature to prepare a draft license application must be accompanied by a proposed financing plan for legislative enactment to cover the construction costs of the facility, unless the Authority has opted to raise construction funds under provision of Section 7015 of this chapter."

5-100 SITE CHARACTERIZATION PLANS AND PROCEDURES
5 -101 Procedures employed in the site characterization process shall be sufficient to allow collection of data required for Agency license review procedures and standards, and for preparation of a license application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Site characterization activities must be completed within 18 months of a legislative decision approving a petition to characterize an alternative site or sites.

5 -102 The Authority shall develop a site-specific Site Characterization Plan for each site to be characterized. The Site Characterization Plans shall describe in detail data collection activities, and be consistent with NRC guidance and state standards.

5 -103 For each technical discipline in the Site Characterization Plan, the Plan shall at a minimum present the following information:
5-103.1 objectives and assumptions;

5-103.2 scope, including issues to be addressed and parameters to be measured;

5-103.3 applicable regulatory requirements and guidance;

5-103.4 existing data and agencies to be contacted;

5-103.5 the detailed field sampling program and analytical procedures to quantify data collected;

5-103.6 the planned schedule of activities;

5-103.7 impacts associated with field work for the discipline;

5-103.8 organization of the technical specialists who will perform the work; and

5-103.9 Quality Assurance/Quality Control and reporting requirements.

5 -104 The Authority shall submit each Characterization Plan to the Agency for review and comment at least 20 working days prior to its implementation.

5 -105 The Authority shall respond within 20 working days to comments submitted by the Agency on the adequacy of each Characterization Plan.

Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Vermont may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.