Utah Administrative Code
Topic - Public Safety
Title R708 - Driver License
Rule R708-31 - Ignition Interlock Systems
Section R708-31-9 - Grounds for Refusal to Certify or Revocation of Certification
Universal Citation: UT Admin Code R 708-31-9
Current through Bulletin 2024-06, March 15, 2024
(1) The division may refuse to certify or may revoke an existing certification for any of the following reasons:
(a) failure to comply
with:
(i) Title 53, Chapter 3, Part 10,
Ignition Interlock System Program Act;
(ii) Section
41-6a-518;
(iii) Title 13, Commerce and Trade;
or
(iv) this rule or any other rule
of the Department of Public Safety;
(b) any omission, false statement, or any
falsification, with or without intent or knowledge of:
(i) an application; or
(ii) any records or other required
information relating to Title 53, Chapter 3, Part 10, Ignition Interlock System
Program Act;
(c)
interference or failure to permit the division or its representatives to
inspect records or any data collected from the camera or system;
(d) a defect in the design, materials, or
workmanship causing the system to fail to function as intended;
(e) notification of the denial, cancellation,
or revocation of certification from another state;
(f) false, incomplete, or inaccurate
information provided by the manufacturer, manufacturer representative, or
independent laboratory;
(g)
modification of the components or design of the system or modification that
causes the system to no longer satisfy the standards in Section
R708-31-4;
(h) the system fails the compliance testing
conducted by the division;
(i) the
system fails to meet the requirements for certification or is no longer in
compliance with the requirements in this rule;
(j) a manufacturer's liability insurance
coverage is terminated, canceled, or expired;
(k) the manufacturer, manufacturer
representative, provider, or installer fails to submit any reports in
accordance with any reporting requirement; or
(1) false or inaccurate information provided
by the manufacturer, manufacturer representative, or independent laboratory
relating to the performance, reliability, function, or capabilities of the
system.
(2) The division shall
forward the notice and order of revocation of the certification of a system to
the manufacturer representative and ensure the notice and order of revocation
specifies the basis for the revocation.
(3) A manufacturer of a previously
decertified system may apply to have the system certified in accordance with
this rule if changes to equipment, procedures, or practice correcting the
violation are submitted in writing to the division.
(4) The division will not consider
certification of a system from a manufacturer that fails to comply with this
subsection.
Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Utah may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
