Utah Administrative Code
Topic - Environmental Quality
Title R309 - Drinking Water
Rule R309-211 - Monitoring and Water Quality: Distribution System - Total Coliform Requirements
Section R309-211-8 - Coliform Treatment Technique Triggers and Assessment Requirements for Protection Against Potential Fecal Contamination

Universal Citation: UT Admin Code R 309-211-8

Current through Bulletin 2024-18, September 15, 2024

(1) Treatment technique triggers. Systems must conduct assessments in accordance with paragraph (2) of this section after exceeding treatment technique triggers in paragraphs (1)(a) and (1)(b) of this section.

(a) Level 1 treatment technique triggers.

(i) For systems taking 40 or more samples per month, the system exceeds 5.0% total coliform-positive samples for the month.

(ii) For systems taking fewer than 40 samples per month, the system has two or more total coliform-positive samples in the same month.

(iii) The system fails to take every required repeat sample after any single total coliform-positive sample.

(b) Level 2 treatment technique triggers.

(i) An E. coli MCL violation, as specified in R309-211-9(1).

(ii) A second Level 1 trigger as defined in paragraph (1)(a) of this section, within a rolling 12-month period, unless the Director has determined a likely reason that the samples that caused the first Level 1 treatment technique trigger were total coliform-positive and has established that the system has corrected the problem.

(2) Requirements for assessments.

(a) Systems must ensure that Level 1 and 2 assessments are conducted in order to identify the possible presence of sanitary defects and defects in distribution system coliform monitoring practices. Level 2 assessments must be conducted by parties approved by the Director.

(b) When conducting assessments, systems must ensure that the assessor evaluates minimum elements that include review and identification of inadequacies in sample sites; sampling protocol; sample processing; atypical events that could affect distributed water quality or indicate that distributed water quality was impaired; changes in distribution system maintenance and operation that could affect distributed water quality (including water storage); source and treatment considerations that bear on distributed water quality, where appropriate (e.g., small ground water systems); and existing water quality monitoring data. The system must conduct the assessment consistent with any Director directives that tailor specific assessment elements with respect to the size and type of the system and the size, type, and characteristics of the distribution system.

(c) Level 1 Assessments. A system must conduct a Level 1 assessment consistent with Director requirements if the system exceeds one of the treatment technique triggers in paragraph (1)(a) of this section.

(i) The system must complete a Level 1 assessment as soon as practical after any trigger in paragraph (1)(a) of this section. In the completed assessment form, the system must describe sanitary defects detected, corrective actions completed, and a proposed timetable for any corrective actions not already completed. The assessment form may also note that no sanitary defects were identified. The system must submit the completed Level 1 assessment form to the Director within 30 days after the system learns that it has exceeded a trigger.

(ii) If the Director reviews the completed Level 1 assessment and determines that the assessment is not sufficient (including any proposed timetable for any corrective actions not already completed), the Director must consult with the system. If the Director requires revisions after consultation, the system must submit a revised assessment form to the Director on an agreed-upon schedule not to exceed 30 days from the date of the consultation.

(iii) Upon completion and submission of the assessment form by the system, the Director must determine if the system has identified a likely cause for the Level 1 trigger and, if so, establish that the system has corrected the problem, or has included a schedule acceptable to the Director for correcting the problem.

(d) Level 2 Assessments. A system must ensure that a Level 2 assessment consistent with Director requirements is conducted if the system exceeds one of the treatment technique triggers in paragraph (1)(b) of this section. The system must comply with any expedited actions or additional actions required by the Director in the case of an E. coli MCL violation.

(i) The system must ensure that a Level 2 assessment is completed by the Director or by a party approved by the Director as soon as practical after any trigger in paragraph (1)(b) of this section. The system must submit a completed Level 2 assessment form to the Director within 30 days after the system learns that it has exceeded a trigger. The assessment form must describe sanitary defects detected, corrective actions completed, and a proposed timetable for any corrective actions not already completed. The assessment form may also note that no sanitary defects were identified.

(ii) The system may conduct Level 2 assessments if the system has staff or management with the certification or qualifications specified by the Director unless otherwise directed by the Director.

(iii) If the Director reviews the completed Level 2 assessment and determines that the assessment is not sufficient (including any proposed timetable for any corrective actions not already completed), the Director must consult with the system. If the Director requires revisions after consultation, the system must submit a revised assessment form to the Director on an agreed-upon schedule not to exceed 30 days.

(iv) Upon completion and submission of the assessment form by the system, the Director must determine if the system has identified a likely cause for the Level 2 trigger and determine whether the system has corrected the problem, or has included a schedule acceptable to the Director for correcting the problem.

(3) Corrective Action. Systems must correct sanitary defects found through either Level 1 or 2 assessments conducted under paragraph (2) of this section. For corrections not completed by the time of submission of the assessment form, the system must complete the corrective action(s) in compliance with a timetable approved by the Director in consultation with the system. The system must notify the Director when each scheduled corrective action is completed.

(4) Consultation. At any time during the assessment or corrective action phase, either the water system or the Director may request a consultation with the other party to determine the appropriate actions to be taken. The system may consult with the Director on all relevant information that may impact on its ability to comply with a requirement of this subpart, including the method of accomplishment, an appropriate timeframe, and other relevant information.

Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Utah may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.