Utah Administrative Code
Topic - Environmental Quality
Title R305 - Administration
Rule R305-7 - Administrative Procedures
Section R305-7-213 - Procedures for Determination on the Merits
Current through Bulletin 2024-18, September 15, 2024
(1) Requirements for briefs on the merits in a special adjudicative proceeding are as follows:
(2) A reply or a surreply brief may not raise any issue that was not raised in the responsive brief or the reply, respectively.
(3) Briefs must be concise, presented with accuracy, logically arranged with proper headings and free from burdensome, irrelevant, or immaterial matters. A brief not meeting these criteria may fail to meet that party's burden of persuasion.
(4) In cases involving more than one petitioner or respondent, including cases consolidated for purposes of the appeal, any number of either may join in a single brief, and any may adopt by reference any part of the brief of another. Parties may similarly join in reply briefs.
(5) The ALJ shall provide an opportunity for oral argument. Oral argument shall, at a minimum, be recorded at the agency's expense using audio recording devices. The agency may elect instead to use a court reporter. If the agency does not elect to use a court reporter, any participant may request that the agency use a court reporter for the oral argument, which request shall be granted by the ALJ provided the requesting person agrees to bear the cost associated with the request. Any such request shall be submitted to the ALJ at least 10 business days before the scheduled oral argument.
(6) The parties may submit comments on the ALJ's recommended decision to the Executive Director. Comments shall not exceed 15 pages, and shall be submitted within ten business days of the service of the recommended decision. A party may file a response to another party's comments, not to exceed five pages, within five business days of the date of the service of the comments.