(1) Application. This Section contains
provisions applicable to the selection of the appropriate type of construction
contract management.
(2)
Flexibility. The executive director may devise an appropriate construction
contract management method for a particular project that will best meet the
needs of the board. The methods outlined in this rule are not an exclusive
list.
(3) Selection. The executive
director shall be expected to consider the results achieved on similar projects
in the past and the methods used, other appropriate and effective methods, and
how a method could be adapted or combined to meet the needs of the
state.
(4) Criteria. Before
choosing the construction contracting method, some factors that may be
considered include:
(a) when the facility must
be ready for occupancy;
(b) the
type of project, for example, housing, offices, labs, heavy or specialized
construction;
(c) the extent to
which the requirements of the occupants are known;
(d) the location of the project;
(e) the size, scope, complexity, and
economics of the project;
(f) the
amount and type of financing available for the project, including whether the
budget is fixed, the source of funding, general or special appropriation,
federal assistance moneys, general obligation bonds or revenue bonds;
(g) the availability, qualification,
experience, and available time of assigned State personnel to the
project;
(h) the availability,
experience and qualifications of outside consultants and contractors.
(5) General Descriptions.
(a) Application of Descriptions. The
following descriptions are provided for the more common contracting methods.
The methods described are not mutually exclusive and may be combined on a
project. These descriptions are not intended to be fixed for all construction
projects of the state. In each project, these descriptions may be adapted to
fit the circumstances of that project.
(b) Single Prime Contractor. The single prime
contractor method is typified by one business entity acting as a general
contractor with the state to complete an entire construction project in
accordance with drawings and specifications provided by the state within a
defined time period. Generally, the drawings and specifications are prepared by
an architectural or engineering firm under contract with the state. Further,
while the general contractor may take responsibility for successful completion
of the project, much of the work may be performed by specialty contractors with
whom the prime contractor has entered into subcontracts.
(c) Multiple Prime Contractors. Under this
method, the board or the board's agent shall contract directly with a number of
specialty contractors to complete portions of the project in accordance with
the board's drawings and specifications. The board or its agent may have
primary responsibility for successful completion of the entire project, or the
contracts may provide that one of the multiple prime contractors shall have
this responsibility.
(d)
Design-Build. The use of a design build provider is authorized if determined to
be used in accordance with this rule. In a design-build project, a business
entity shall contract directly with the board to meet requirements described in
a set of performance specifications. Both the design and construction
responsibilities are assumed by the design-build contractor. This method can
include instances where the design-build contractor supplies the site as part
of the package.
(e) Construction
Manager. The use of a construction manager, including a construction
manager/general contractor, is authorized if determined to be used in
accordance with this rule and shall be selected in accordance with R131-4. A
construction manager shall be experienced in construction, have the ability to
evaluate and to implement drawings and specifications as they affect time,
cost, and quality of construction and the ability to coordinate the
construction of the project, including the addition of change orders. A
contract with a construction manager may be issued early in a project to assist
in the development of a cost effective design. The construction manager may be
appointed the single prime contractor, or may be required to guarantee that the
project will be completed by a specified time, and not to exceed a specified
maximum price. The procurement of a construction manager may be based, among
other criteria, on proposals for a management fee which is either a lump sum or
a percentage of construction costs with a guaranteed maximum cost or, on
proposals for a lump sum or guaranteed maximum cost for the construction of the
project. The contract with the construction manager may also provide for a
sharing of any savings which are achieved below the guaranteed maximum cost.
When entering into any subcontract that was not specifically included in the
construction manager/general contractor's cost proposal, the construction
manager/general contractor shall procure that subcontractor in accordance with
R131-4 in the same manner as if the subcontract work was procured directly by
the board.
(f) Sequential Design
and Construction. Sequential design and construction is a method whereby design
of substantially the entire structure is completed prior to beginning the
construction process.
(g) Phased
Design and Construction. Phased design and construction is a method whereby
construction is begun when appropriate portions have been designed but before
design of the entire structure has been completed. This method is also known as
fast track construction.
(h) Design
Assist Contracting. Design assist contacting may be used when it is determined
by the executive director that a contractor (including a particular
subcontractor trade) is needed subject to the following:
(i) it is determined that the design assist
contractor (DAC) has a unique knowledge of a material or product that warrants
the interaction of the DAC early on with the designer;
(ii) the DAC will be providing construction
estimates, details and documents as well as the construction or installation of
materials or products into the project;
(iii) the DAC is selected through a
competitive sealed proposal process where qualifications are the main criteria
for selection;
(iv) the DAC will
provide information to the executive director and the designer of the project
as needed to define the scope of the work for a fee; and
(v) a contract may be entered with a DAC only
when the proposed cost for the work is equal to or less than the budget
established by the board for the project, provided that the board may increase
the budget, the board/executive director may use the information provided by
the DAC and initiate a procurement process for the construction or
installation; or the board/executive director may reduce the scope of the
work.