Current through Reg. 49, No. 38; September 20, 2024
(a) Establishment
or relocation by notice. A trust company may establish or relocate an
additional office pursuant to Finance Code, §
RSA 182.203,
by filing a written notice with the banking commissioner containing all
information required by subsection (b) of this section, accompanied by the
required filing fee pursuant to §
RSA
21.2 of this title (relating to Filing and
Investigation Fees), and notice of the submission must be published as required
by subsection (d) of this section. A trust company filing notice of an
additional office under this subsection may establish the additional office on
the 31st day after the date the required notice and fee are received by the
banking commissioner unless the banking commissioner gives notice in writing,
prior to the expiration of that time period, that an earlier or later date is
authorized or that additional information is required pursuant to subsection
(c) of this section.
(b) Contents
of notice. The notice filed under subsection (a) of this section must disclose:
(1) the name and home office location of the
trust company requesting the additional office;
(2) the street address of the trust company's
proposed additional office;
(3) a
description of the activities proposed to be conducted at the proposed
additional office;
(4) the desired
effective date for establishment of the additional office;
(5) a certified copy of the resolution
adopted by the trust company's board of directors authorizing the proposed
additional office;
(6) the cost to
be incurred in connection with the establishment of the additional office and a
statement of the impact of such cost on the trust company's ability to meet
liquidity requirements;
(7) a
description of any actual proposed, or contemplated financial involvement by
any officer, director, manager, managing participant, or principal shareholder
or participant of the trust company with respect to establishing the additional
office;
(8) evidence that the trust
company has considered applicable federal law, if any; and
(9) such other information as the banking
commissioner may require.
(c) Request for additional information. At
any time before the 31st day after the date the notice required by subsection
(a) of the section is filed, the banking commissioner may issue written notice
to the trust company specifying a later date for establishing or relocating an
additional office and requiring the submission of additional information and
additional time for analysis. Upon issuance of a notice requiring the
submission of additional information and additional time for analysis, the
trust company may establish or relocate the additional office only on written
approval of the banking commissioner.
(d) Public notice and participation.
(1) Within 14 days of the initial submission
of the notice required under subsection (a) of this section, the trust company
shall publish notice of the submission as required by §
RSA 21.5 of this
title (relating to Public Notice). Notice must be published in the community
where the proposed additional office will be located and must specifically
disclose the location of the proposed additional office.
(2) For a period of 14 days after publication
of notice or such longer period as the banking commissioner may allow for good
cause shown, the public may submit written comments or protests. Persons
submitting comments will not be charged fees or costs, but are not entitled to
further notice of or participation in the proceedings. Each protesting party
has the rights and responsibilities set forth in subsections (f) and (g) of
this section.
(e)
Criteria for determining significant supervisory or regulatory concern. The
banking commissioner may deny permission to establish or relocate an additional
office of a trust company if the commissioner has significant supervisory or
regulatory concern about the proposed transaction.
(1) In evaluating whether significant
supervisory concerns exist regarding a proposed additional office, the banking
commissioner shall consider the financial condition of the trust company, the
financial effect of the additional office on the trust company, the management
abilities of the trust company, and the history and prospects of the trust
company and its affiliates regarding fulfillment of responsibilities to
regulatory agencies and to the public. A request will ordinarily be denied if
the trust company is in less than satisfactory financial condition as of its
most recent examination.
(2) In
evaluating whether significant regulatory concerns exist regarding a proposed
additional office, the banking commissioner will consider the relevant
marketplace and the convenience of the public in accessing desired trust
services and preferred trustees. The banking commissioner will follow the
principles that the marketplace normally is the best regulator of economic
activity, and that healthy competition promotes a sound and more efficient
trust company system that serves customers well. Accordingly, absent
significant supervisory concerns, the general policy of the banking
commissioner is to approve applications, requests and notices to establish and
relocate additional offices, provided that approval would not otherwise violate
applicable provisions of federal or state law (including any requirements for
federal banking agency approval).
(3) In evaluating whether the banking
commissioner should have significant supervisory or regulatory concerns as set
forth in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection, the banking commissioner
will consider written material in the record, including the contents of the
application, notice or request, comments on file, the department's files as
they relate to the current financial condition of the trust company, and other
data that the banking commissioner may properly officially notice.
Specifically, the banking commissioner shall approve the establishment or
relocation of an additional office if the following considerations are met:
(A) the department's files do not indicate
significant supervisory concerns as they relate to the current financial
condition of the trust company, including but not limited to its capital, asset
quality, management, earnings and liquidity;
(B) the costs of establishing or relocating
the office, including costs of purchasing or leasing the office site, necessary
furnishings, staffing and equipment, do not significantly affect the operations
of the trust company as a whole;
(C) the projected earnings appear reasonable
and sufficient to support expenses attributable to the establishment and
relocation of the office without jeopardizing the safety and soundness of the
trust company;
(D) the depth and
quality of management of the trust company and of the proposed additional
office are sufficient to justify a belief that the trust company will operate
in compliance with law;
(E) the
trust company has demonstrated a responsiveness to recommendations made in past
state and federal regulatory examinations or other regulatory findings and the
trust company has generally been operated in substantial compliance with all
applicable state and federal laws; and
(F) no areas of general supervisory concern
exist as determined by the banking commissioner in the exercise of
discretion.
(4) The
banking commissioner shall direct the department to assemble, evaluate, and
make a recommendation regarding all relevant documentation and data as set
forth in this subsection on or before the 30th day after the date the
application is accepted for filing.
(5) The banking commissioner shall either
approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application, notice, or request on
or before the 30th day after the date of the department's
recommendation.
(f)
Protest.
(1) A protest may be initiated by
notifying the department in writing of the intent to protest the establishment
of an additional office at the specified location within the time period
allowed by subsection (d) of this section, accompanied by the filing fee as set
forth in §
RSA
21.2(c) of this title
(relating to Filing and Investigation Fees). If the protest is untimely, the
filing fee will be returned to the protesting party. If the protest is timely,
the department will notify the applicant of the protest and mail or deliver a
complete copy of the non-confidential sections of the application to the
protesting party on or before the 14th day after receipt of the protest or the
application, whichever occurs later.
(2) The protesting party shall file a
detailed protest responding to each substantive statement contained in the
notice on or before the 20th day after the date of receipt of the application.
The protesting party's response must indicate with regard to each such
statement whether it is admitted or denied. The applicant shall file a written
reply to the detailed response on or before the 10th day after the date the
response is filed. Both the detailed response and the reply thereto must be
verified by affidavit and must contain a certificate of service on the opposing
party. When applicable, statements in the response and in the reply may be
supported by references to data available in sources of which official notice
may properly be taken. Comments received by the department and any replies of
the applicant to such comments will also be made available to the protesting
party.
(3) The banking commissioner
may extend any time period set forth in this subsection for good cause shown.
Good cause includes, but is not limited to, failure of the department to
furnish required documentation, forms, or information within a reasonable time
to permit its effective use by the recipient, or failure of a party to timely
serve a filed document on an opposing party. The filing date is the date the
document is actually received by the department and not the date of mailing.
Failure to timely file a required document is considered an abandonment of the
application or protest, as applicable. Rule 21a, Texas Rules of Civil
Procedure, governs the methods and manner of authorized service and the
computation of time periods under this subsection.
(g) Hearing.
(1) The banking commissioner may not be
compelled to hold a hearing prior to allowing or not allowing an additional
office to be established. In the exercise of discretion, the banking
commissioner may consider granting a hearing on a notice of additional office
at the request of either the filing trust company or a protesting party. The
banking commissioner may order a hearing even if no hearing has been
requested.
(2) A party requesting a
hearing must indicate with specificity what issues are involved that cannot be
determined on the basis of the record compiled pursuant to subsection (e) of
this section and why the issues cannot be so determined. The request for
hearing and the banking commissioner's decision with regard to granting a
hearing will be made a part of the record. If a hearing is not requested or if
a request for hearing is denied, the banking commissioner will consider the
notice in the manner set forth in and solely on the basis of the written record
established pursuant to subsection (e) of this section.
(3) If a hearing is granted, the
administrative law judge shall enter appropriate order(s) and conduct the
hearing within 30 days after the date the hearing was granted, or as soon
thereafter as is reasonably possible, under Chapter 9 of this title (relating
to Rules of Procedure for Contested Case Hearings, Appeals, and Rulemakings)
and the Administrative Procedure Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 2001).
Issues will be limited to those on which testimony is absolutely necessary, and
the administrative law judge may require testimony to be submitted in written
form and prefiled. No evidence will be received on matters that are not in
dispute. No issues or evidence will be considered that are not relevant to the
standards set forth in subsection (e) of this section or that are not supported
by the notice, response, or reply. A proposal for decision, exceptions and
replies to such proposal for decision, the final decision of the banking
commissioner, and motions for rehearing are governed by Chapter 9 of this
title.
(h) Closing an
additional office.
(1) Subject to paragraph
(2) of this subsection, at least 30 days prior to the date a trust company
proposes to close an additional office, the trust company shall file written
notice with the banking commissioner disclosing:
(A) the name and home office location of the
trust company seeking to close the additional office location;
(B) the street address of the additional
office location to be closed;
(C)
the effective date of the proposed closing;
(D) evidence of distribution of written
notice of closing to all customers and account holders at least 45 days prior
to the proposed closing date.
(E)
the place and street address of location where records from the closed office
will be transferred;
(F) a copy of
the resolution adopted by the trust company's board of directors authorizing
the proposed closing of the additional location; and
(G) such other information as the banking
commissioner may require.
(2) If the trust company must comply with
notice requirements of federal banking law applicable to closing a branch
office, in lieu of compliance with paragraph (1) of this subsection, the trust
company may provide the banking commissioner with a copy of the closing notice
filed with the appropriate federal banking regulator simultaneously with its
filing.
(3) Once the additional
office has been closed, the trust company may not reopen the additional office
except upon notice or application for a new additional office in compliance
with this section.