Texas Administrative Code
Title 31 - NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION
Part 10 - TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Chapter 357 - REGIONAL WATER PLANNING
Subchapter E - ADOPTION, SUBMITTAL, AND AMENDMENTS TO REGIONAL WATER PLANS
Section 357.51 - Amendments to Regional Water Plans
Current through Reg. 49, No. 38; September 20, 2024
(a) Local Water Planning Amendment Requests. A Political Subdivision in the RWPA may request an RWPG to consider specific changes to an adopted RWP based on changed conditions or new information. An RWPG must formally consider such request within 180 days after its receipt and shall amend its adopted RWP if it determines an amendment is warranted. If the Political Subdivision is not satisfied with the RWPG's decision on the issue, it may file a petition with the EA to request Board review the decision and consider changing the approved RWP. The Political Subdivision shall send a copy of the petition to the chair of the affected RWPG.
(b) Major Amendments to RWPs and State Water Plan. An RWPG may amend an adopted RWP at any meeting, after giving notice for a major amendment and holding a hearing according to § 357.21(g)(3) of this title (relating to Notice and Public Participation). An amendment is major if it does not meet the criteria of subsection (c), (d) or (e) of this section. An RWPG may propose amendments to an approved RWP by submitting proposed amendments to the Board for its consideration and possible approval under the standards and procedures of this section.
(c) Minor Amendments to RWPs and State Water Plan.
(d) Amendment for Water Planning for a Clean Coal Project. An amendment to an RWP or the State Water Plan to facilitate planning for water supplies reasonably required for a clean coal project, as defined by Texas Water Code § 5.001, relating to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, shall be adopted by the process described in this section. However, an RWPG may amend the RWP to accommodate planning for a clean coal project without a public meeting or hearing if the EA determines that:
(e) Substitution of Alternative WMSs. RWPGs may substitute one or more evaluated Alternative Water Management Strategies for a recommended strategy if the strategy originally recommended is no longer recommended and the substitution of the Alternative WMS is capable of meeting the same Water Need without over-allocating any source. Before substituting an Alternative WMS, the RWPG must provide public notice in accordance with § 357.21(g)(1) of this title and request written approval from the EA. If the EA approves the substitution, the RWPG must provide public notice in accordance with § 357.21(g)(2) of this title before taking action to substitute the Alternative WMS.
(f) In the instance of a substitution of an Alternative WMS or a proposed amendment with a recommended WMS to be supplied from a different RWPA, the RWPG recommending such strategy shall submit, concurrently with the submission of the substitution or proposed amendment to the EA, a copy of the substitution or proposed amendment to the RWPG for the location of such strategy. The provisions of sections §357.50(d), (e), (f), and (h) of this title (related to Adoption, Submittal, and Approval of Regional Water Plans) and § 357.62 of this title (related to Interregional Conflicts) shall apply to substitution or amendment to the RWP in the same manner as those subdivisions apply to an IPP.
(g) Amendment for Infeasible Recommended WMSs or WMSPs. Following the results of the analysis presented at a public meeting in accordance with § 357.12(b) of this title (relating to General Regional Water Planning Group Responsibilities and Procedures), an RWPG shall amend an adopted RWP to remove an infeasible recommended WMS or WMSP, as defined by Texas Water Code § 16.053(h)(10). The RWPG will follow the amendment processes in accordance with subsections (b), (c), or (e) of this section. An amendment for infeasible recommended WMSs or WMSPs shall be submitted to the Board by a date established by the EA. The amendment shall summarize the project components and address why they were determined to be infeasible. The amendment must also summarize any changes to unmet needs as a result of removing the infeasible WMS or WMSP. Subsequent amendments during the planning cycle for infeasible recommended WMS or WMSP may occur at the discretion of the RWPG based upon information presented to the RWPG by project sponsors.
(h) Amending the State Water Plan. Following amendments of RWPs, including substitutions of Alternative WMSs, the Board shall make any necessary amendments to the State Water Plan as outlined in § 358.4 of this title (relating to Guidelines).
(i) Errata to RWPs. RWPGs may adopt errata to the final RWP to correct minor, non-substantive errors identified after adoption of the final RWP but prior to adoption of the corresponding State Water Plan. Before adopting errata to a final RWP, the RWPG must provide public notice and receive comments in accordance with § 357.21(g)(1) of this title. Upon adoption of the errata, the RWPG shall submit to the EA an errata package containing revised pages of the RWP and public comments received. The EA will notify the RWPG within 60 days whether the errata are acceptable as errata or will need to be made through the amendment process.