Current through Reg. 49, No. 38; September 20, 2024
(a) The state trustees may utilize any
reliable incident-specific methods and procedures including, but not limited
to, those listed in this section to determine and quantify injury to and loss
of services of natural resources. In selecting the appropriate assessment
procedures and protocols, the state trustees shall consider the unique
characteristics and the location of the natural resources affected by the
unauthorized discharge of oil, including adverse impacts caused by response
activities, if any. The methods identified in this section shall be designed to
ensure that the cost of any restoration, rehabilitation, replacement or
acquisition project shall not be disproportionate to the value of the natural
resource before the injury. Any assessment generated by the state trustees
shall be reasonable and the costs of conducting the assessment shall have a
rational connection to the value of the injured resources.
(b) The state trustees may find injury to a
natural resource when:
(1) the natural
resource was exposed to oil from an unauthorized discharge; and
(2) there was a pathway between the natural
resource and the discharged oil; and
(3) reliable methodologies indicate adverse
effects on natural resources resulting from exposure to discharged oil;
or
(4) the natural resource was
adversely impacted by response activities.
(c) The state trustees may find a loss of
services when:
(1) the ability of the natural
resource to provide ecological services has been reduced as the result of an
unauthorized discharge of oil; or
(2) the ability of the natural resource to
provide public uses has been reduced as the result of an unauthorized discharge
of oil.
(d) The
procedures and protocols to determine and quantify injury and loss of services
of natural resources may include:
(1)
sampling of surface waters for temperature, pH, total suspended solids,
salinity, dispersion and other parameters relevant to the fate and effects of
oil and its degradation constituents;
(2) sampling of sediments and shoreline
materials for reference and for oil and its degradation constituents;
(3) sampling of biota to determine
bioaccumulation, acute toxicity, chronic toxicity, reproductive effects,
community structure, and other relevant parameters;
(4) analysis of the properties of the
discharged oil;
(5) an evaluation
of the observable mortality and the potential for acute and chronic
effects;
(6) surveys of special
protection or management areas, state and federal wildlife refuges, parks,
habitats of threatened and endangered species, and other relevant natural
areas;
(7) photography, ground
truthing, and other appropriate methods to delineate the assessment
area;
(8) reviews of relevant and
reliable prior studies in scientific and economic literature and appropriate
extrapolations therefrom;
(9)
studies to determine the actual and potential mortality, and biological and
behavioral impacts of the unauthorized discharge of oil on biota;
(10) collection of data and surveys to
measure the loss of ecological and public uses;
(11) toxicity testing of the discharged oil
to measure impacts on biota actually located in the assessment area;
(12) studies to determine the natural rate of
recovery of injured resources considering seasonality, cumulative impacts and
natural variations;
(13) techniques
to identify functions and values of injured natural resources and their public
uses and ecological services;
(14)
reliable cost estimates of alternative restoration plans; and
(15) any other reliable techniques to
determine injury and damages to natural resources and appropriate assessment
methods.
(e) The state
trustees shall value the injury to natural resources and any loss of services
as a result of an unauthorized discharge of oil utilizing the following
valuation methods and criteria:
(1) state
trustees shall ensure that no double counting of damages for injuries or loss
of services results from the valuation methodology or methodologies
employed;
(2) where more than one
valuation method is used, the state trustees shall document each natural
resource injury and loss of services that each valuation methodology
measures;
(3) valuation shall be
conducted on an incident-specific basis for the unauthorized discharge of oil.
The state trustees shall utilize methods that provide appropriate, valid and
reliable resource values for the injuries associated with the unauthorized
discharge of oil.
(f)
The incident-specific valuation methods utilized by the state trustees may
include, but are not limited to, the following:
(1) Fish and wildlife. The Texas Parks and
Wildlife Department's guidelines for measuring the monetary value of fish and
wildlife resources (as defined in §§
69.20-69.31 of this
title (relating to Fish and Wildlife Values)) may be used to value the loss of
fish and wildlife resources.
(2)
Recreational services. The travel cost method may be used to estimate the value
of recreational services provided by natural resources affected by the
unauthorized discharge of oil. The valuation shall be based on information on
the number and costs of recreational visits to or near the site.
(3) Factor income method. When a lost or
injured resource and/or service is an input to a production process, the factor
income methodology may be used. This methodology may be used to estimate the
change in economic rent attributable to the injured natural resource or lost
service as the result of the unauthorized discharge of oil. When the price of
the good being produced is not affected by the injuries to natural resources or
the loss of their services, then the change in economic rent is simply the sum
of the changes in factor costs for each affected input.
(4) Hedonic price method. The hedonic method
relates the price of a marketed commodity, such as real property, to its
attributes, such as the quality of the surrounding environment or access to
environmental amenities. Where services provided by natural resources, such as
water quality or air quality, function as attributes of real property or other
market goods, the hedonic price method may be used to determine the value of
the change in services for the public.
(5) Market price.
(A) For natural resources traded in markets,
the state trustees may utilize the changes in market supply and demand for the
natural resource. The measure of damages to consumers of the natural resource
is the difference between the price of the marketed resource with and without
the injury.
(B) Where the supply of
the natural resources is fixed, then the observed change in market price may be
used as a proxy for damages per unit of affected natural resource. The measure
of damages is the difference between the market with and without the
injury.
(C) Appraisal prices may be
utilized when market price is not readily determinable. When this method is
used, the damages should be measured, to the extent possible, by uniform
generally acceptable appraisal standards, and any appropriate federal and state
appraisal manuals.
(6)
Habitat or species replacement cost method. The habitat or species replacement
cost method involves estimating the damages in terms of the cost of obtaining
from alternative sources the equivalent of the injured resources. As
appropriate, damages may be calculated as the cost of replacing entire habitats
that support multiple species and provide a variety of resource services. The
quality and the quantity of the resources replaced can be measured by the loss
of services occasioned from the onset of the unauthorized discharge of oil
through the full recovery of the injured resources and the restoration of the
services. In applying this method, the state trustees should:
(A) quantify a total discounted measure of
the lost services over the full duration of the injury, taking into account the
extent to which the resource and/or service will recover over time;
(B) determine the total discounted measure of
services provided by the restoration or replacement project over the full life
of the relevant species or habitat;
(C) calculate the appropriate scale of the
restoration or replacement project, such that the total discounted services
provided is equivalent to the total discounted value of interim lost services;
and
(D) estimate the cost of
implementing the restoration or replacement project.
(7) Benefit transfer method. The benefit
transfer method involves the application of existing valuation point estimates
or valuation function estimates and data that were developed in one context to
value a similar resource and/or service affected by the unauthorized discharge
of oil. When using benefits transfer, the state trustees should consider:
(A) the comparability of the users and of the
resource and/or services being valued in the initial studies and the changes
resulting from the discharge of concern;
(B) the comparability of the change in
quality or quantity of resources and/or services in the initial studies and the
ones affected by the unauthorized discharge of oil of concern; and
(C) the quality of the studies being used for
the transfer.
(8)
Contingent valuation method. The state trustees may use the contingent
valuation method to estimate loss in passive use values that result from an
unauthorized discharge of oil. The state trustees shall ensure that contingent
valuation instruments are designed and administered in accordance with the
recommendations and guidance provided in the Report of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Panel on Contingent Valuation, as published
in the Federal Register (58 FR 4601), January 15, 1993.
(g) When discounting or compounding, the
state trustees shall use the following methods:
(1) For costs of assessment and restoration
costs already incurred, the state trustees shall use the actual nominal United
States Treasury rates for the past periods over which the costs were incurred
to calculate the present value of these costs at the time the claim is
presented to the responsible person.
(2) For diminution in value of injured or
lost resources or lost resource function, the state trustees shall use a
discount rate equal to the real United States Treasury rate of comparable
maturity to the duration of the natural resource injury. These rates are
published in regular updates to Appendix C of the Office of Management and
Budget Circular A-94. The trustees shall use the most recent update to this
circular published prior to the date at which the claim is presented.
(3) For estimated restoration costs, the
state trustees shall use a discount rate equal to the United States Treasury
rate of comparable maturity to the period over which the restoration will be
carried out.
(h) The
state trustees are entitled to pre-judgement interest and post-judgement
interest on natural resource damage claims at a rate equal to the nominal
dealer commercial paper rate, as published in the Wall Street Journal, on the
date the claim is presented to the responsible person, compounded forward from
30 days from the date a damage claim is presented until the time of
payment.