Texas Administrative Code
Title 30 - ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Part 1 - TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Chapter 112 - CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION FROM SULFUR COMPOUNDS
Subchapter F - REQUIREMENTS IN THE HUTCHINSON COUNTY NONATTAINMENT AREA
Division 4 - REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PHILLIPS 66 BORGER REFINERY
Section 112.233 - Monitoring Requirements
Current through Reg. 50, No. 13; March 28, 2025
(a) Separately for 29 FCCU Stack (EPN 29P1) and 40 FCCU Stack (EPN 40P1), the owner or operator shall install, operate, calibrate, and maintain a continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) as specified in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §60.105a(g)(1), (2) and (5) regardless of whether these provisions otherwise apply or provide exemptions for certain activities; use an analyzer with a minimum analyzer accuracy of plus or minus (±)2.5%, a dedicated totalizing gas flow measurement system with a minimum measurement accuracy of ±5%, and temperature monitor with a minimum accuracy of ±1%; convert data from all monitoring devices to a common concentration, flow, pressure, and temperature measurement basis and calculate and record 15-minute and subsequent block one-hour average sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions.
(b) Separately for SRU Incinerator (EPN 34I1) and SCOT Unit Incinerator (EPN 43I1), the owner or operator shall install, operate, calibrate, and maintain a CEMS as specified in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §60.106a(a), regardless of whether these provisions otherwise apply; use an analyzer with an accuracy of plus or minus (±)2.5%, a dedicated totalizing gas flow measurement system with an accuracy of ±5%, and temperature monitor with an accuracy of ±1%; convert data from all monitoring devices to a common concentration, flow, pressure, and temperature measurement basis and calculate and record 15-minute and subsequent block one-hour average SO2 emissions.
(c) The owner or operator shall install, operate, calibrate, and maintain dedicated instrumentation according to the manufacturers' specifications to continuously and separately monitor the flow rate and the total sulfur concentration of the inlet gas streams of EPN 66FL1, EPN 66FL2, EPN 66FL3, and EPN 66FL12, in accordance with the 40 CFR § 60.107a(e) and (f)(1), regardless of whether these provisions otherwise apply or provide an exemption for any flare activities, as follows:
(d) The owner or operator shall continuously monitor the flow rate, temperature, and total sulfur or H2S concentration in the gases combusted by each affected EPN listed in § 112.230(b)(6) and (7) of this title (relating to Applicability), in accordance with 40 CFR § 60.107a(a), (e) and (f)(1), except for the SRU Incinerator (EPN 34I1) and SCOT SRU Incinerator (EPN 43I1) that must be monitored under §112.233(b), as follows:
(e) Continuous monitoring data collected in accordance with requirements in this section must undergo an appropriate quality assurance and quality control process and be validated for at least 95% of the time that the monitored emission point has emissions; an owner or operator must utilize an appropriate data substitution process based on the most accurate methodology available, which is at least equivalent to engineering judgement, to obtain all missing or invalidated monitoring data for the remaining period the monitored emission point has emissions.
(f) Minor modifications to monitoring methods may be approved by the executive director. Monitoring methods other than those specified in this section may be used if approved by the executive director and validated by 40 CFR Part 63, Appendix A, Test Method 301. For the purposes of this subsection, substitute "executive director" in each place that Test Method 301 references "administrator." These validation procedures may be waived by the executive director or a different protocol may be granted for site-specific applications. Minor modifications that may be approved under this subsection include increases in the frequency of monitoring and the replacement of parametric monitoring with direct emissions monitoring with a CEMS provided appropriate quality assurance control, accuracy specifications, and data validation requirements are specified and no less stringent than monitoring requirements for a comparable EPN in this division.