Texas Administrative Code
Title 28 - INSURANCE
Part 1 - TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
Chapter 3 - LIFE, ACCIDENT, AND HEALTH INSURANCE AND ANNUITIES
Subchapter N - NONFORFEITURE STANDARDS FOR INDIVIDUAL LIFE INSURANCE IN EMPLOYER PENSION PLANS
Section 3.1304 - Alternate Rule
Current through Reg. 50, No. 13; March 28, 2025
(a) In determining minimum cash surrender value and amounts of paid-up nonforfeiture benefits for any policy of insurance on either a male or a female insured on a form of insurance with separate rates for smokers and nonsmokers delivered or issued for delivery in this state after the operative date of former Insurance Code Article 3.44a, §8 (recodified in Insurance Code Chapter 1105, Subchapter B, §§1105.051 - 1105.057), and before January 1, 2017, for that policy form, in addition to the mortality tables that may be used according to § 3.1303 of this title (relating to Standard), the tables in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection may be used. For policies issued on or after January 1, 2017, the valuation manual, adopted under Insurance Code Chapter 425, Subchapter B, provides the tables to be used.
(b) The following blended mortality tables are considered as the basis for acceptable tables according to subsection (a) of this section:
(c) The Texas Department of Insurance adopts and incorporates into this subchapter by reference the tables to which subsection (b) of this section refers as tables to be used in conjunction with the section adopted under this subchapter. Copies of these tables can be obtained from the Texas Department of Insurance, Life and Health Actuarial, MC-LH-ACT, P.O. Box 12030, Austin, Texas 78711-2030.
(d) The tables specified in subsection (b)(1), (7), (8), and (14) of this section may not be used except where the proportion of persons insured is anticipated to be 90% or more of one sex or the other.
(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, an insurer may not use the blended mortality tables in subsection (b) of this section unless the Norris decision is known to apply to the policies involved, or unless there exists a bona fide concern on the part of the insurer that the Norris decision might reasonably be construed to apply by a court having jurisdiction.