Texas Administrative Code
Title 28 - INSURANCE
Part 1 - TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
Chapter 21 - TRADE PRACTICES
Subchapter P - MENTAL HEALTH PARITY
Division 3 - COMPLIANCE ANALYSIS FOR MH/SUD PARITY
Section 21.2436 - Quantitative Parity Analysis: Covered Benefits
Current through Reg. 50, No. 13; March 28, 2025
(a) General information. Within each QTL template, in the worksheet titled "Covered Benefits," an issuer must identify:
(b) List of covered benefits. In the worksheet titled "Covered Benefits," an issuer must list each benefit covered by the plan or plan design, including all benefits listed in the schedule of benefits and the policy, certificate, evidence of coverage, or contract of insurance. Covered benefits must be repeated as needed to list each benefit on separate lines, based on:
(c) Combining covered benefits. Covered benefits that have the same QTLs may be combined for the purposes of the QTL analysis;
(d) Examples. The examples in this subsection illustrate the requirements of subsections (b) and (c) of this section.
(e) Categorization, classification, and subclassification of covered benefits. For each covered benefit, the issuer must:
(f) Methodology for categorizing covered benefits. Within the QTL template, in the worksheet titled "Categorization Methodology," an issuer must provide an explanation of the methodology used to categorize a covered benefit as a mental health benefit, medical/surgical benefit, or substance use disorder benefit. If a plan defines a condition as a mental health condition, substance use disorder, or medical or surgical condition, it must categorize benefits for those conditions in the same way for purposes of this rule. For example, if a plan defines unspecified dementia as a mental health condition, it must categorize benefits for unspecified dementia as mental health benefits. An issuer must apply the same categorization for both the QTL and NQTL analyses.
(g) Methodology for classifying and subclassifying covered benefits. Within the QTL template, in the worksheet titled "Classification Methodology," an issuer must provide an explanation of the methodology used to classify and subclassify covered benefits, consistent with § 21.2408(b)(2) and (c)(3) of this title. In determining the classification in which a particular benefit belongs, an issuer must apply the same standards to medical/surgical benefits as to MH/SUD benefits. Plans and issuers must assign covered intermediate MH/SUD benefits (such as residential treatment, partial hospitalization, and intensive outpatient treatment) to the existing six classifications in the same way that they assign intermediate medical/surgical benefits to these classifications. For example, if a plan classifies care in skilled nursing facilities and rehabilitation hospitals for medical/surgical benefits as inpatient benefits, it must classify covered care in residential treatment facilities for MH/SUD benefits as inpatient benefits. If a plan treats home health care as an outpatient benefit, then any covered intensive outpatient MH/SUD services and partial hospitalization must be considered outpatient benefits as well. An issuer must apply its methodology consistently when classifying covered benefits and use the same classification for both the QTL and NQTL analyses.