Current through Reg. 50, No. 13; March 28, 2025
(a) Purpose. This memorandum of understanding
(MOU) is a non-financial, mutual agreement between the Texas School for the
Blind and Visually Impaired, hereafter referred to as "the School," and the
Texas Education Agency, hereafter referred to as "the Agency," established
pursuant to the Texas Education Code (TEC), §30.005. This MOU will
establish:
(1) the method for developing and
reevaluating a set of indicators of the quality of learning at the
School;
(2) the process for the
Agency to conduct and report on an annual evaluation of the School's
performance on the indicators;
(3)
the requirements for the School's Board to publish, discuss, and disseminate an
annual report describing the educational performance of the School;
and
(4) the type of information the
School shall be required to provide through the Public Education Information
Management System (PEIMS).
(b) Accountability compliance reviews.
(1) The Agency shall monitor the School's
compliance with federal and state laws and regulations related to services for
special populations by conducting a periodic on-site review. The Agency shall
determine the schedule for the review.
(2) The Agency, with input from the School,
shall develop a compliance monitoring instrument that itemizes compliance
indicators that are the responsibility of the School. The instrument will be
disseminated to the School and updated jointly as appropriate.
(c) Indicators of quality of
learning for the School.
(1) No later than
August 31, 1999, the Agency and the School shall jointly develop and agree upon
a set of quality indicators that are appropriate to the characteristics of
students served by the School.
(2)
Annually, the commissioner of education shall approve indicators of performance
that measure the quality of student learning at the School.
(3) The indicators shall include measures of
academic and/or developmental performance as well as other measures appropriate
to the characteristics of the student populations served.
(4) To the extent appropriate, the indicators
shall incorporate academic excellence indicators and alternative assessment
measures required under TEC, Chapter 39, Subchapter B.
(d) Annual performance evaluation.
(1) The School's annual performance
evaluation shall be based on quality indicators selected annually from among
the set of quality indicators developed and jointly agreed upon by the School
and the Agency to address the characteristics of the student groups
served.
(2) The selected quality
indicators used for the annual performance evaluation shall measure, as
appropriate, academic and/or non-academic performance on norm- or
criterion-referenced instruments; progress in the attainment of student
individualized education program goals and objectives; statewide
criterion-referenced assessments; completion of courses or credits; or
completion of graduation requirements. Additional non-academic indicators may
be selected that measure dropout rates, attendance, or other appropriate
measures of student success.
(3)
The method for evaluating the School's annual performance shall be as follows.
(A) Annually, by September 1, the School
shall submit to the commissioner an accountability proposal. The proposal shall
be developed with input from the School's planning and decision-making
committee and shall include the following information:
(ii) performance objectives within each
indicator; and
(iii) minimum
standards for determining achievement of performance objectives.
(B) By September 15, the
commissioner shall review the proposal and notify the School superintendent of
approval, or needed modifications to obtain approval, of the proposed
indicators and performance objectives.
(C) By November 1, the commissioner shall
provide notification of final approval of the proposal indicators and
performance objectives.
(D) By July
1 following the year for which the School's performance is being evaluated, the
School shall submit to the Agency all complete and accurate data necessary to
document performance with respect to the approved indicators and performance
objectives.
(4) The
schedule of activities related to the annual performance evaluation shall
include the following activities.
(A) During
the 1998-1999 school year, the School and the Agency shall determine methods of
evaluating student performance for determining achievement of performance
objectives.
(B) During the
1999-2000 school year, the School shall evaluate student performance in areas
addressed by the quality indicators.
(C) Beginning with the 2000-2001 school year,
the Agency shall perform an annual performance evaluation for the
School.
(e)
Annual performance report.
(1) The Governing
Board of the School shall publish an annual report describing the educational
performance of the School. The report shall include the School's performance
objectives and progress toward these objectives. Supplemental information to be
included in the report shall be determined by the School's Governing
Board.
(2) The Governing Board of
the School will disseminate the annual performance report to parents of
enrolled students, districts that have placed students at the School, and
regional education service centers (RESCs). Additionally, the Governing Board
will notify the parents of enrolled students, districts that have placed
students at the School, and RESCs of an opportunity for public discussion of
the annual performance report at a regularly scheduled board meeting. The
School's planning and decision-making committee will hold at least one public
meeting annually for the purpose of discussing the School's performance
report.
(3) By December 1, the
School shall disseminate the annual performance report.
(f) Reporting of data.
(1) The School will report PEIMS data
according to the following schedule.
(A) The
Agency and the School shall jointly develop separate action plans for the
possible collection of organization, student, staff, and financial data. The
action plan for organization and student data shall be completed by June 1998;
for staff data by June 1999; and for financial data by June 2000.
(B) The Agency and the School shall conduct
studies to determine the feasibility of collecting data for each information
category according to the following schedule: organization and student data
during the 1998-1999 school year; staff data during the 1999-2000 school year;
and financial data during the 2000-2001 school year.
(C) In each information category for which it
is determined that data collection is feasible, the Agency and the School shall
pilot the collection as follows: organization and student data during the
1999-2000 school year; staff data during the 2000-2001 school year; and
financial data during the 2001-2002 school year.
(D) Initial PEIMS collection shall be
contingent on resolution of feasibility issues and modifications indicated by
the pilot process.
(2)
To the extent possible, the Agency shall assist the School in accessing
available resources to implement this section of the MOU.
(g) Dispute resolution. Disputes between the
School and the Agency concerning implementation of this MOU shall be resolved
as follows.
(1) Staff of the School and the
Agency shall identify and attempt to resolve the specific issues involved in
the dispute.
(2) If staff of the
School and the Agency are unable to resolve the dispute after a reasonable time
period, the executive officers of the School and the Agency shall assist the
staff in identifying a mutually agreeable resolution to the dispute.
(3) If the executive officers (or either of
them) are unable to reach a mutually agreeable resolution, the School and the
Agency shall pursue resolution through the use of mediation pursuant to the
Governmental Dispute Resolution Act, Government Code, Chapter 2008. The
mediator shall make such arrangements and decisions respecting the conduct of
the proceedings as needed in the sole discretion of the mediator. The costs of
mediation shall be borne equally by the School and the Agency.
(4) If the School and the Agency fail to
reach agreement through mediation pursuant to the Governmental Dispute
Resolution Act, Government Code, Chapter 2008, the following procedure shall be
followed.
(A) The School and the Agency shall
each select one impartial third party pursuant to Government Code, §
2008.053.
(B) The impartial third parties selected by
the School and the Agency shall jointly select another impartial third party,
who must be a person eligible to serve as impartial third party pursuant to
Government Code, §
2008.053. The person
selected shall be the arbitrator of the dispute.
(C) The arbitrator selected by the impartial
third parties selected by the School and the Agency shall arbitrate the dispute
pursuant to Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, §
154.027.
The arbitrator shall make such arrangements and decisions respecting the
conduct of the proceedings as needed in the sole discretion of the arbitrator.
The costs of arbitration shall be borne equally by the School and the Agency.
The parties hereby stipulate in advance that the decision of the arbitrator
shall be binding and enforceable against both parties pursuant to Texas Civil
Practice and Remedies Code, §
154.027(b).
(h) Other terms.
(1) This MOU shall be signed by the executive
officers of the School and the Agency and shall be effective September 1,
1998.
(2) This MOU may be
considered for expansion, modification, or amendment upon mutual agreement of
the executive officers of the School and the Agency.
(3) In the event that federal and/or state
laws should be amended, federally interpreted, or judicially interpreted so as
to render continued implementation of this MOU unreasonable or impossible, the
School and the Agency may agree to amend or terminate this MOU.